Search Results (123)

The Yizhuan constructs a temporal ethics centered on “time” (shi 時), bridging the Will of Heaven and human affairs. This ethical paradigm is primarily manifested in the tripartite conceptual framework: First, as the transcendent source of temporal ethics, “The Will of Heaven” (tianming 天命) endows the ever-changing processes of cosmic existence with a moral teleological dimension. Secondly, “Heaven’s Timing” (tianshi 天時) manifests as the Will of Heaven within specific time and spatial contexts, guiding actors to discern the operational principles of fortune and opportunity. Finally, “the Timely Mean” (shizhong 時中), as the fundamental principle of practical life, refers to the practice of acting in harmony with the times, based on the agent’s insight into the Will of Heaven and grasp of Heaven’s Timing. Its essence lies in adapting to the times to achieve the supreme realm of morality, as outlined in the Way of the Mean (zhongdao 中道). The core purpose of the temporal ethics in the Yizhuan is to emphasize understanding moral practice within the dimension of time, opposing the abstract application of moral principles divorced from specific contexts. It requires the agent to make choices aligned with the Will of Heaven at the appropriate moment, cultivating moral character and addressing complex practical matters within the flow of time. Full article

Electric vehicle(EV) diffusion exhibits nonlinear, path-dependent dynamics shaped by interacting economic, technological, and social constraints. This paper develops a unified hybrid systems framework that captures these complexities by integrating microfounded household choice, capacity-constrained firm behavior, local network spillovers, and multi-level policy intervention within a Filippov differential-inclusion structure. Households face heterogeneous preferences, liquidity limits, and network-mediated moral and informational influences; firms invest irreversibly under learning-by-doing and profitability thresholds; and national and local governments implement distinct financial and infrastructure policies subject to budget constraints. The resulting aggregate adoption dynamics feature endogenous switching, sliding modes at economic bottlenecks, network-amplified tipping, and hysteresis arising from irreversible investment. We establish conditions for the existence of Filippov solutions, derive network-dependent tipping thresholds, characterize sliding regimes at capacity and liquidity constraints, and show how network structure magnifies hysteresis and shapes the effectiveness of local versus national policy. Optimal-control analysis further demonstrates that national subsidies follow bang–bang patterns and that network-targeted local interventions minimize the fiscal cost of achieving regional tipping. Beyond theoretical characterization, the framework is structurally calibrated to match the order-of-magnitude effects reported in leading empirical and simulation-based studies, including network diffusion models, agent-based simulations, bass-type specifications, and fuel-price shock analyses. The hybrid formulation reproduces short-run percentage-point subsidy effects, long-run forecast dispersion under alternative network assumptions, and policy-induced equilibrium shifts observed in the applied literature while providing a unified geometric interpretation of these heterogeneous results through explicit basin boundaries and regime switching. The framework provides a complex systems perspective on sustainable mobility transitions and clarifies why identical national policies can generate asynchronous regional outcomes. These results offer theoretical foundations for designing coordinated, cost-effective, and network-aware EV transition strategies. Full article

Recent advancements in AI have enabled autonomous agents to interact within complex environments, with deliberative BDI (Belief–Desire–Intention) agents standing out for their human-inspired reasoning capabilities. However, defining the initial beliefs that constitute an agent’s cognitive profile remains a significant challenge. This process often relies on manual approaches that limit scalability and validation. This study proposes the Personality–Role–Belief (P–R–B) Model for BDI agents, introducing a novel architecture for generating cognitive profiles applicable to domains such as social simulation and non-player characters (NPCs). The model translates Five-Factor Model (FFM) scores into specific social roles, assigning base beliefs to each. A key contribution is a weighting mechanism designed to resolve conflicts between beliefs when multiple roles coexist. Inspired by Cohen’s effect size conventions, this mechanism establishes an influence hierarchy that quantifies belief strength based on social roles. Consequently, this approach not only enables agents to exhibit coherent behavior consistent with their personality but also establishes a foundation for modeling ethical decision-making through role–trait alignment, thereby facilitating the creation of agents capable of navigating morally complex social contexts. Full article

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as decision-support systems across linguistically diverse populations, yet whether they reason consistently across languages remains underexplored. We investigate whether LLMs exhibit language-dependent preferences in distributive justice scenarios and whether domain persona prompting can reduce cross-linguistic inconsistencies. Using six behavioral economics scenarios adapted from canonical social preferences research, we evaluate Gemini 2.0 Flash across English and Korean in both baseline and persona-injected conditions, yielding 1,201,200 observations across ten professional domains. Results reveal substantial baseline cross-linguistic divergence: five of six scenarios exhibit significant language effects (9–56 percentage point gaps), including complete preference reversals. Domain persona injection reduces these gaps by 62.7% on average, with normative disciplines (sociology, economics, law, philosophy, and history) demonstrating greater effectiveness than technical domains. Systematic boundary conditions emerge: scenarios presenting isolated ethical conflict resist intervention. These findings parallel human foreign-language effects in moral psychology while demonstrating that computational agents are more amenable to alignment interventions. We propose a compensatory integration framework explaining when professional framing succeeds or fails, providing practical guidance for multilingual LLM deployment, and establishing cross-linguistic consistency as a critical alignment metric. Full article

Since the 1990s, but especially in the early 21st century, a new family of right-wing populist parties has become a stable feature of Western European party systems. These parties, linked by several studies to new cleavages related to globalization processes and values changes which have happened since the late 20th century, are also marked by a new use of religion. In their worldview, this latter is indeed mainly an identity and civilization marker, related to the belonging, rather than believing or behaving, dimension. As a consequence, while they promote Christian symbols in the public sphere and are actively engaged in debates related to morality politics and multicultural society, they also contribute to processes of banalization and culturalization of faith, and to the delegitimization of religious leaders and institutions. For this reason, the scholarly community is divided about their role as promoters of religion, or, rather, as (maybe unintentional) agents of secularization. This article will try to contribute to this discussion by analyzing the Italian case. Italy is indeed an interesting laboratory for the study of right-wing populism, with the development over the past few decades of two state-wide parties belonging to the right-wing populist family, the League and Brothers of Italy, both currently part of the Meloni cabinet. The article will analyze the historical roots of the parties and their developments, their manifestos, their policy proposals, and their relations with religious institutions and symbols to reflect on the two parties’ uses of religion for political aims, and their meaning in relation to the above-mentioned theoretical debates. Full article

Background/Objectives: Persuasive communication in moral decision-making contexts involves complex emotional and cognitive processes. This study aimed to investigate electrophysiological (EEG) dissimilarity between individuals during a persuasive interaction on a moral dilemma. Methods: Participants were paired into 14 dyads in which a member assumed the role of Persuasive Agent (PA) and the other of Persuasion Target (PT), discussing a moral decision-making scenario while their neural activity was recorded through an EEG hyperscanning paradigm. Dyads were later categorized based on perceived viewpoint change (high, mixed, low), and dissimilarity within dyads in EEG bands was analyzed across frontal, temporo-central, and parieto-occipital regions in left and right hemispheres. Results: Results showed a significant increase in frontal delta-band dissimilarity in mixed dyads, compared to temporo-central and parieto-occipital areas. The greater frontal delta dissimilarity in mixed dyads likely reflects divergent emotional and motivational engagement during persuasion. Specifically, individuals who changed their viewpoint may have exhibited stronger emotional resonance and attentional engagement compared to their partner. Conclusions: The study advances understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying persuasion in morally charged contexts and offers new insights into dyadic brain dynamics during complex social exchanges. Full article

This entry delineates artificial intelligence (AI) ethics and the field’s core ethical challenges, surveys the principal normative frameworks in the literature, and offers a historical analysis that traces and explains the shift from ethical monism to ethical pluralism. In particular, it (i) situates the field within the trajectory of AI’s technical development, (ii) organizes the field’s rationale around challenges regarding alignment, opacity, human oversight, bias and noise, accountability, and questions of agency and patiency, and (iii) compares leading theoretical approaches to address these challenges. We show that AI’s development has brought escalating ethical challenges along with a maturation of frameworks proposed to address them. We map an arc from early monisms (e.g., deontology, consequentialism) to a variety of pluralist ethical frameworks (e.g., pluralistic deontology, augmented utilitarianism, moral foundation theory, and the agent-deed-consequence model) alongside pluralist governance regimes (e.g., principles from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), and the Asilomar AI principles). We find that pluralism is both normatively and operationally compelling: it mirrors the multidimensional problem space of AI ethics, guards against failures (e.g., reward hacking, emergency exceptions), supports legitimacy across diverse sociotechnical contexts, and coheres with extant principles of AI engineering and governance. Although pluralist models vary in structure and exhibit distinct limitations, when applied with due methodological care, each can furnish a valuable foundation for AI ethics. Full article

From the late seventeenth century onward, the central aim of missionary Christianity in the British Atlantic was to Christianize slavery; that is, to render the institution morally and theologically acceptable within a Christian framework. This work of “amelioration” was envisioned as a gradual process, with missionaries from both the established Church of England and a host of dissenting denominations playing a central role in its advancement. Collectively, they promoted a discourse of Christian slavery that aimed both to reassure slaveowners of the compatibility between slavery and Christianity and to frame the conversion of enslaved people as a means of producing a more obedient, industrious, and morally disciplined labor force. To be sure, in promoting a Christianized vision of slavery, missionary societies were deeply complicit in the exploitation of enslaved Africans. Yet, ironically, the very tools they employed to pacify and discipline (biblical instruction and literacy) were repurposed to articulate a platform of resistance, ultimately contributing to slavery’s undoing. This essay employs critical discourse analysis to examine how these dynamics unfolded in two pivotal uprisings in the British Atlantic world: the Demerara Rebellion of 1823 and the Christmas Rebellion of 1831 in Jamaica. In both cases, missionary endeavors contributed to the counter-discursive appropriation of biblical theology that played a critical role in transforming enslaved people into agents of political change. Still, reimagining scripture was only part of the story. Crucially, it was the alignment of a new religious consciousness with unfolding political events, that transformed simmering discontent into open revolt. Full article

Public transit subsidization often suffers from a double (or bilateral) moral hazard problem, where both regulators and operators may reduce their efforts due to information asymmetry, thereby compromising service quality despite significant public investment. This paper develops a continuous-time principal-agent model to investigate optimal subsidy contract design under such conditions, where both parties exert costly, unobservable efforts that jointly determine stochastic service outcomes. Using stochastic dynamic programming and exponential utility functions, we derive closed-form solutions for the optimal contracts. Our analysis yields three key findings. First, under standard technical assumptions, the optimal subsidy contract takes a simple linear form based on final service quality, facilitating practical implementation. Second, the contract’s incentive intensity decreases with environmental uncertainty, highlighting a fundamental trade-off between risk-sharing and effort inducement. Third, a unique and mutually agreeable contract emerges as the parties’ risk preferences and productivity levels converge. This study extends the classic principal-agent framework by incorporating bilateral moral hazard in a dynamic setting, offering new theoretical insights into public-sector contract design. For policymakers, the results suggest that performance-based subsidies should be calibrated to account for operational uncertainty, and that regulators are active co-producers of service quality whose own unobservable efforts—distinct from the subsidy itself—are critical to outcomes.The proposed framework provides actionable guidance for designing effective, incentive-compatible subsidies to enhance public transit service delivery. Full article

This article illuminates the cosmology of Raa Haqi (often called Dersim Alevism or Kurdish Alevism), a rarely examined strand within Alevi Studies. Existing scholarship’s emphasis on identity politics and sparse ethnography has left Raa Haqi’s mythological and cosmological dimensions underexplored. This paper approaches Raa Haqi through a dual authority framework: (1) Ocak lineages and Ocak–talip relations—sustained by kinship institutions like kirvelik, musahiplik, and communal rites such as the cem—and (2) jiares, non-human agents from the Batın realm that manifest in Zahir as sacred places, objects, and animals. Methodologically, I conduct a close, motif-based reading of folktales compiled by Caner Canerik (2019, Dersim Masalları I), treating them as ethnographic windows into living theology. The analysis shows that tales encode core principles—rızalık (mutual consent), ikrar (vow), sır (the secret knowledge), fasting and calendrical rites, ritual kinship, and moral economies involving humans, animals, and Batın beings. Dreams, metamorphosis, and jiare-centered orientations structure time–space, ethics, and authority beyond the Ocak, including in individual re-sacralizations of objects and sites. I conclude that these narratives do not merely reflect belief; they actively transmit, test, and renew Raa Haqi’s cosmological order, offering Alevi Studies a theory-grounded, source-proximate account of Kurdish Alevi mythic thought. Full article

In this article, we explain how Kant upends the terms of the debate concerning the relationship between God’s existence and an objective morality by looking at his moral-teleological argument for God’s existence in the third Critique. We explain Kant’s rejection of external sources of moral normativity and his method of grounding moral authority in the normativity of practical reason. We then turn to Kant’s argument justifying a practical belief in God as the moral author of nature. Kant’s claims about how we must conceptualize organisms teleologically and, as a result, how reason seeks an unconditioned end of nature, brings together our moral purpose with a conception of nature as an organized whole. Since our teleological concepts of organisms seem to require that human beings serve as the final, unconditioned end of nature, but morality and nature might be incompatible and divergent, we must also believe in a moral author of nature. This belief guards against demoralization and creates a unified view of the human moral agent and the world she inhabits, which Kant thinks of as indispensable for our practical lives. Kant notoriously blurs the lines between theology and ethics in nonstandard ways. Although he rejects many traditional approaches to grounding ethics in a conception of divine commands or eternal law, he still devotes a considerable amount of time to discussing the role of religion as a bulwark of the moral life. The goal of this paper is to defend Kant’s relevance to a discussion of the relationship between an objective ethics and the existence of God; his contribution deserves our notice precisely for the ways in which it promises to shift the terms of the contemporary debate and complicate possible answers to the question of whether there can be an objective morality without God. In contemporary philosophical literature, Kant’s argument contending that we must hope in God from a practical point of view on pain of irrationality of acting from duty has enjoyed substantial discussion. Here, however, we focus on a lesser-known suite of arguments that in order to so much as cognize ourselves and other species as the sorts of natural beings they are, we must believe in a supersensible moral author of these natures. This set of arguments ultimately dovetail with the more well-known argument for theistic hope and operate in much the same way. But they touch on facets of Kant’s whole philosophical system, such as his account of teleological judgment and the unity and final end of all of nature. Our goal is to explicate these arguments and illuminate their relevance of these Kantian arguments to the debate about the relevance of God to objective morality. We will argue that while an objective ethics is possible without God due to the active role of practical reason in rational agents, belief in God’s existence strengthens the claims of morality, both for psychological reasons but also by providing a more unified conception of moral and natural reality. Full article

Smart cities are an emerging technology that is receiving new ethical attention due to recent advancements in artificial intelligence. This paper provides an overview of smart city ethics while simultaneously performing novel theorization about the definition of smart cities and the complicated relationship between (smart) cities, ethics, and politics. We respond to these ethical issues by providing an innovative representation of the agent-deed-consequence (ADC) model in symbolic terms through deontic logic. The ADC model operationalizes human moral intuitions underpinning virtue ethics, deontology, and utilitarianism. With the ADC model made symbolically representable, human moral intuitions can be built into the algorithms that govern autonomous vehicles, social robots in healthcare settings, and smart city projects. Once the paper has introduced the ADC model and its symbolic representation through deontic logic, it demonstrates the ADC model’s promise for algorithmic ethical decision-making in four dimensions of smart city ethics, using examples relating to public safety and waste management. We particularly emphasize ADC-enhanced ethical decision-making in (economic and social) sustainability by advancing an understanding of smart cities and human-AI teams (HAIT) as group agents. The ADC model has significant merit in algorithmic ethical decision-making, especially through its elucidation in deontic logic. Algorithmic ethical decision-making, if structured by the ADC model, successfully addresses a significant portion of the perennial questions in smart city ethics, and smart cities built with the ADC model may in fact be a significant step toward resolving important social dilemmas of our time. Full article

Today, the impact of information technologies (IT) on humanity in this artificial intelligence (AI) era is vast, transformative, and remarkable, especially on human beliefs, practices, and truth discovery. Modern IT advancements like AI, particularly generative models, offer unprecedented opportunities to influence human thoughts and to challenge our entrenched worldviews. This paper seeks to study the evolving relationship between humans and non-human agents, such as AI systems, and to examine how generative technologies are reshaping the dynamics of knowledge, authority, and societal interaction, particularly in contexts where technology intersects with deeply held social values. In the study, the broader implications for societal practices and ethical questions will be zoomed in for investigation and discussed in the context of moral value as the focus. The paper also seeks to list out the various generative models developed for AI to reason and think logically, reviewed and evaluated for their potential impacts on humanity and social values. Two main research contributions, namely the (1) Virtue Ethics-Based Character Modeling for Artificial Moral Advisor (AMA) and the (2) Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), have been proposed to align contemporary large language models (LLMs) with moral values. The construction approach of the moral dataset that focused on virtue ethics for training the proposed LLM will be presented and discussed. The implementation of the AI moral character representation will be demonstrated in future research work. Full article

In the era of the “super-individual”, companion robots (or sex robots), as novel agents for intimate relationships, have provoked profound ethical controversies. This article responds to Fang Xudong’s defense of companion robots in terms of the “instrumentalization of womanhood” and further explores the possible stance of Confucian ethics towards companion robots. Companion robots risk fostering emotional self-deception, which violates the Confucian self-cultivation requirement of “sincerity within, manifesting outwardly” 诚于中，形于外. They also fail to fulfill the “generative virtue” 生生之德 encompassing biological reproduction and moral education through kinship and may even undermine the family’s function as a carrier of ethical practice. From a Confucian perspective, the “pseudo-intimacy” facilitated by companion robots might alleviate symptoms of social isolation in an atomized age, but it cannot replace the familial warmth characterized by “affection between father and son, distinct roles between husband and wife” 父子有亲，夫妇有别. Only in the ethical practice of facing the other and taking responsibility can one truly realize the ideal of “cultivating oneself and bringing all things to their ideal state” 成己成物. Full article

The question of whether a God is needed to justify or ground moral facts is mooted by the fact that true moral facts exist in all possible universes that contain rational agents. This can be demonstrated in three stages. First, it is necessarily the case that true moral facts can only be described as the imperatives that supersede all other imperatives. Second, it is necessarily the case that for any rational agent there will always be true hypothetical imperatives that supersede all other imperatives. And third, if there are true hypothetical imperatives that supersede all other imperatives, they are then, necessarily, the only true moral facts. As this follows for any rational agent in any possible universe, the presence of God is irrelevant to the existence of moral facts. God could be more capable of identifying those true moral facts, but he cannot author or ground them. And though a God could casuistically alter moral imperatives by altering the corresponding physics, he is constrained in what he can make true this way by moral fundamentals that are always necessarily true. God is therefore not necessary for there to be moral facts. Full article