Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (14)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = microfluidic sperm sorting

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 1039 KB  
Article
Comparison of Swim-Up and Microfluidic Sperm Sorting Methods in Selection of Sperm for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection
by Michal Ješeta, Adéla Doubravská, Jana Antalíková, Lenka Mekiňová, Kateřina Franzová, Kateřina Remundová, Jan Hošek, Bartosz Kempisty and Robert Hudeček
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(11), 5374; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26115374 - 4 Jun 2025
Viewed by 3941
Abstract
The use of microfluidic sperm sorting (MFSS) systems in infertility treatment is increasing due to their practicality and ease of use. While often presented as highly effective, their efficacy in patients with varying sperm analysis results remains uncertain. In this study, we evaluated [...] Read more.
The use of microfluidic sperm sorting (MFSS) systems in infertility treatment is increasing due to their practicality and ease of use. While often presented as highly effective, their efficacy in patients with varying sperm analysis results remains uncertain. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of MFSS compared with the swim-up (SU) technique in terms of oxygen radical levels and spermiogram parameters. Samples from each patient were processed using both methods, followed by assessments of sperm concentration, motility, morphology, DNA integrity, acrosomal status, and mitochondrial membrane potential. Participants were selected based on sperm analysis and categorized as normozoospermic (n = 40) or non-normozoospermic (n = 28). An analysis of separation techniques revealed no significant differences, except for a lower percentage of DNA-fragmented sperm in the MFSS group compared with SU within the non-normozoospermic cohort (SU: 10.0% vs. MFSS: 5.69%, p = 0.027). No differences were observed between SU and MFSS in normozoospermic men. The MFSS method is a simple technique, frequently used in laboratories, that yields good results but does not offer a substantial advantage over SU. The primary benefit of MFSS appears to be a significant reduction in the proportion of sperm with DNA fragmentation compared with SU in patients with abnormal sperm analysis results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Spermatogenesis and Male Infertility)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 536 KB  
Article
Teratozoospermia and Embryo Development: The Significance of Sperm Selection in In Vitro Fertilization Success
by Petronela Naghi, Ioana Alexandra Zaha, Liana Stefan, Andrea Sorian, Adelin Marcu, Liliana Sachelarie and Anca Huniadi
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(11), 3763; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113763 - 27 May 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 5281
Abstract
Background: Sperm morphology is a key factor influencing fertilization and embryo development in assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, the predictive value of sperm deformity indices and selection techniques remains debated. This study evaluated the impact of teratozoospermia on fertilization, blastocyst formation, and embryo [...] Read more.
Background: Sperm morphology is a key factor influencing fertilization and embryo development in assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, the predictive value of sperm deformity indices and selection techniques remains debated. This study evaluated the impact of teratozoospermia on fertilization, blastocyst formation, and embryo quality, comparing conventional and microfluidic sperm selection methods. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on ART cycles involving patients with teratozoospermia. Sperm selection was performed using density gradient centrifugation (DGC) or microfluidic sperm sorting (MFSS). The correlations between the Sperm Deformity Index (SDI), Multiple Anomalies Index (MAI), and Teratozoopermia Index (TZI) with fertilization rates, blastocyst formation, and embryo quality were assessed. Statistical analysis included correlation tests, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and independent samples t-tests. Results: Patients with severe teratozoospermia exhibited lower fertilization rates (p < 0.01) and reduced blastocyst formation (p = 0.02). The SDI and MAI showed moderate negative correlations with fertilization (r = −0.15 and r = −0.25, respectively) and blastocyst development (r = −0.20 and r = −0.30, respectively), while the TZI had only weak associations (r = −0.10 and r = −0.15, respectively). ROC analysis demonstrated that the SDI and MAI were moderate predictors of embryo viability (AUC = 0.70 and 0.75, respectively). Patients who underwent microfluidic sperm selection had higher fertilization rates (p = 0.03) and improved blastocyst quality (p = 0.04) than those processed with DGC. Conclusions: Severe teratozoospermia negatively affects fertilization and blastocyst formation, with the SDI and MAI showing moderate predictive value for embryo development. The use of microfluidic sperm selection significantly improved embryo quality, supporting its clinical relevance in ART. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Male Fertility in the Modern Age: Challenges and Opportunities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 5549 KB  
Article
Microfluidic Sorting Can Be Applied for Assisted Reproduction Sperm Selection in Different Cases of Semen Abnormalities
by Giulia Traini, Maria Emanuela Ragosta, Lara Tamburrino, Alice Papini, Sarah Cipriani, Linda Vignozzi, Elisabetta Baldi and Sara Marchiani
Life 2025, 15(5), 790; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15050790 - 15 May 2025
Viewed by 4190
Abstract
Sperm preparation is a critical step in assisted reproduction, aiming to isolate spermatozoa with optimal characteristics and high fertilizing potential. Traditional sperm selection methods involve centrifugation, which may cause sperm damage. Microfluidic sperm sorting (MSS) offers an alternative approach, mimicking the female reproductive [...] Read more.
Sperm preparation is a critical step in assisted reproduction, aiming to isolate spermatozoa with optimal characteristics and high fertilizing potential. Traditional sperm selection methods involve centrifugation, which may cause sperm damage. Microfluidic sperm sorting (MSS) offers an alternative approach, mimicking the female reproductive tract environment, avoiding centrifugation, and reducing manipulation and processing time. This study aims to compare the performance of MSS and Swim-up (SU) in 26 normozoospermic, 31 hyperviscous normozoospermic, 15 oligozoospermic, and 9 asthenozoospermic subjects. Semen samples were collected from male subjects undergoing routine semen analysis at Careggi University Hospital, Florence. Sperm selection was carried out using both SU and MSS. The parameters assessed included sperm motility, viability, concentration, kinematics, DNA fragmentation (sDF), chromatin compaction, and oxidative status. Both SU and MSS improved sperm characteristics compared to unselected samples. MSS isolated high-quality spermatozoa with lower sDF and higher chromatin compaction than SU, not only in normozoospermic samples but also in samples with semen defects like hyperviscosity, low concentration and/or motility, and high sDF. In conclusion, the use of microfluidics may enhance the chances of successful fertilization and improve reproductive outcomes, especially for individuals with compromised semen quality where conventional methods may fail. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 2013 KB  
Review
A Narrative Review on the Sperm Selection Methods in Assisted Reproductive Technology: Out with the New, the Old Is Better?
by Angeliki Tiptiri-Kourpeti, Byron Asimakopoulos and Nikolaos Nikolettos
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(4), 1066; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041066 - 7 Feb 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 8939
Abstract
Background: Male infertility, accounting for nearly half of infertility cases worldwide, has spurred significant research into its causes, diagnosis, and treatment strategies. Genetic abnormalities, social causes, environmental exposures, lifestyle, and further health conditions are key contributors. Methods: Essential to improving the outcomes of [...] Read more.
Background: Male infertility, accounting for nearly half of infertility cases worldwide, has spurred significant research into its causes, diagnosis, and treatment strategies. Genetic abnormalities, social causes, environmental exposures, lifestyle, and further health conditions are key contributors. Methods: Essential to improving the outcomes of ART is, among other things, the selection of high-quality sperm, which requires methods that assess sperm motility, morphology, DNA integrity, and oxidative stress levels. Results: Traditional techniques such as semen analysis, swim-up, and density gradient centrifugation (DGC) are still widely used, but there is ongoing discussion regarding the limitations in detecting DNA damage and oxidative stress. Advanced methods like magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) and microfluidic sorting have emerged as more precise tools for selecting sperm with better genetic integrity, although they face challenges in terms of their standardization, cost, and clinical adoption. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and Raman spectroscopy offer the potential for more automated, accurate sperm selection, minimizing human error and variability. However, the integration of these methods into clinical practice requires further validation through large-scale studies, including assessments of their long-term safety and cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: Future research should focus on refining sperm selection techniques, tailoring them to personalized infertility approaches, and addressing the gaps in the evidence to improve ART outcomes and patient care. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1358 KB  
Article
Effect of Two Different Sperm Selection Methods on Boar Sperm Parameters and In Vitro Fertilisation Outcomes
by Maria Serrano-Albal, Marie Claire Aquilina, Lucas G. Kiazim, Louisa J. Zak, Darren K. Griffin and Peter J. Ellis
Animals 2024, 14(17), 2544; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172544 - 1 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2920
Abstract
Porcine in vitro embryo production (IVP) protocols have conventionally used density gradient selection (DGS) by centrifugation to prepare sperm samples and achieve successful fertilisation. However, the possible toxicity of the solutions used and the potential damage caused by the centrifugation step may have [...] Read more.
Porcine in vitro embryo production (IVP) protocols have conventionally used density gradient selection (DGS) by centrifugation to prepare sperm samples and achieve successful fertilisation. However, the possible toxicity of the solutions used and the potential damage caused by the centrifugation step may have a negative effect on the quality of the sample. Microfluidic chip-based sperm (MCS) sorting has been proposed as an alternative technique for the selection of high-quality sperm with the purpose of improving reproductive outcomes in IVF. This device does not require centrifugation or any toxic solution to prepare the sample for fertilisation. The sample is not subjected to unnecessary stress, and the process is less operator-dependent. In this study, we compared the sperm parameters of unselected extender-diluted boar semen samples with selected samples using DGS and MCS methods. The results show an expected reduction in sperm concentration after both methods. All the groups were significantly different from one another, with MCS being the group with the lowest concentration. Though the three groups had a similar overall motility, significant differences were found in progressive motility when comparing the unselected group (control, 19.5 ± 1.4%) with DGS and MCS. Progressive motility in DGS was also significantly higher than in MCS (65.2 ± 4.9% and 45.7% ± 5.3, respectively). However, MCS selection resulted in enriched sperm samples with a significantly lower proportion of morphologically abnormal sperm compared to DGS. After fertilisation, no statistical differences were found between the two methods for embryological parameters such as cleavage rates, blastulation rates, and embryo quality. The number of cells in blastocysts derived from MCS was significantly greater than those derived from DGS sperm. Thus, we demonstrate that MCS is at least as good as the standard DGS for most measures. As a more gentle and reproducible approach for sperm selection, however, it could improve consistency and improve IVP outcomes as mediated by a greater proportion of morphologically normal sperm and manifested by a higher cell count in blastocysts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research Advances in Pig Reproduction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3965 KB  
Article
Antibody-Conjugated Magnetic Beads for Sperm Sexing Using a Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotube Microfluidic Device
by Chalinee Phiphattanaphiphop, Komgrit Leksakul, Thananut Wanta, Trisadee Khamlor and Rungrueang Phattanakun
Micromachines 2022, 13(3), 426; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13030426 - 10 Mar 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 5275
Abstract
This study proposes a microfluidic device used for X-/Y-sperm separation based on monoclonal antibody-conjugated magnetic beads, which become positively charged in the flow system. Y-sperms were selectively captured via a monoclonal antibody and transferred onto the microfluidic device and were discarded, so that [...] Read more.
This study proposes a microfluidic device used for X-/Y-sperm separation based on monoclonal antibody-conjugated magnetic beads, which become positively charged in the flow system. Y-sperms were selectively captured via a monoclonal antibody and transferred onto the microfluidic device and were discarded, so that X-sperms can be isolated and commercially exploited for fertilization demands of female cattle in dairy industry. Therefore, the research team used monoclonal antibody-conjugated magnetic beads to increase the force that causes the Y-sperm to be pulled out of the system, leaving only the X-sperm for further use. The experimental design was divided into the following: Model 1, the microfluid system for sorting positive magnetic beads, which yielded 100% separation; Model 2, the sorting of monoclonal antibody-conjugated magnetic beads in the fluid system, yielding 98.84% microcirculation; Model 3, the sorting of monoclonal antibody-conjugated magnetic beads with sperm in the microfluid system, yielding 80.12% microcirculation. Moreover, the fabrication microfluidic system had thin film electrodes created via UV lithography and MWCNTs electrode structure capable of erecting an electrode wall 1500 µm above the floor with a flow channel width of only 100 µm. The system was tested using a constant flow rate of 2 µL/min and X-/Y-sperm were separated using carbon nanotube electrodes at 2.5 V. The structure created with the use of vertical electrodes and monoclonal antibody-conjugated magnetic beads technique produced a higher effective rejection effect and was able to remove a large number of unwanted sperm from the system with 80.12% efficiency. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Micro/Nano Fabrication for Life Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 23600 KB  
Article
Viscous Cervical Environment-on-a-Chip for Selecting High-Quality Sperm from Human Semen
by Manhee Lee, Jin Woo Park, Dongwon Kim, Hyojeong Kwon, Min Jeong Cho, Eun Ji Lee, Tai Eun Shin, Dae Keun Kim, Seungki Lee, Do Gyeung Byeun, Jung Jae Ko, Jae Ho Lee and Jung Kyu Choi
Biomedicines 2021, 9(10), 1439; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9101439 - 10 Oct 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4673
Abstract
When ejaculated sperm travels through the vagina to the uterus, mucus secreted by the cervical canal generally filters out sperm having low motility and poor morphology. To investigate this selection principle in vivo, we developed a microfluidic sperm-sorting chip with a viscous medium [...] Read more.
When ejaculated sperm travels through the vagina to the uterus, mucus secreted by the cervical canal generally filters out sperm having low motility and poor morphology. To investigate this selection principle in vivo, we developed a microfluidic sperm-sorting chip with a viscous medium (polyvinylpyrrolidone: PVP) to imitate the biophysical environment mimic system of the human cervical canal. The material property of the PVP solution was tuned to the range of viscosities of cervical mucus using micro-viscometry. The selection of high-quality human sperm was experimentally evaluated in vitro and theoretically analyzed by the convection-diffusion mechanism. The convection flow is shown to be dominant at low viscosity of the medium used in the sperm-sorting chip when seeded with raw semen; hence, the raw semen containing sperm and debris convectively flow together with suppressed relative dispersions. Also, it was observed that the sperm selected via the chip not only had high motilities but also normal morphologies and high DNA integrity. Therefore, the biomimetic sperm-sorting chip with PVP medium is expected to improve male fertility by enabling the selection of high-quality sperm as well as uncovering pathways and regulatory mechanisms involved in sperm transport through the female reproductive tract for egg fertilization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioengineered In Vitro Models for Biomedical Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 714 KB  
Article
Sperm Selection and Embryo Development: A Comparison of the Density Gradient Centrifugation and Microfluidic Chip Sperm Preparation Methods in Patients with Astheno-Teratozoospermia
by Cagla Guler, Sureyya Melil, Umit Ozekici, Yaprak Donmez Cakil, Belgin Selam and Mehmet Cincik
Life 2021, 11(9), 933; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11090933 - 7 Sep 2021
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 6775
Abstract
In recent years, microfluidic chip-based sperm sorting has emerged as an alternative tool to centrifugation-based conventional techniques for in vitro fertilization. This prospective study aims to compare the effects of density gradient centrifugation and microfluidic chip sperm preparation methods on embryo development in [...] Read more.
In recent years, microfluidic chip-based sperm sorting has emerged as an alternative tool to centrifugation-based conventional techniques for in vitro fertilization. This prospective study aims to compare the effects of density gradient centrifugation and microfluidic chip sperm preparation methods on embryo development in patient populations with astheno-teratozoospermia. In the study, the semen samples of the patients were divided into two groups for preparation with either the microfluidic or density gradient methods. Selected spermatozoa were then used to fertilize mature sibling oocytes and the semen parameters and embryo development on days 3 and 5 were assessed. While the density gradient group was associated with a higher sperm concentration, motility (progressive and total) was significantly higher in the microfluidic chip group. No significant differences were observed in the fertilization rates or grade 1 (G1) and grade 2 (G2) proportions of the third-day embryos. Furthermore, while the proportions of the poor, fair and good blastocysts on day 5 did not differ significantly, excellent blastocysts (indicating high-quality embryos) were observed in a significantly higher proportion of the microfluidic chip group. When compared to the classical density gradient method, the microfluidic chip sperm preparation yielded sperm with higher motility and higher quality blastocysts at day 5; in patients with astheno-teratozoospermia. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Male Infertility: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1831 KB  
Review
Microfluidic Systems for Isolation of Spermatozoa from Testicular Specimens of Non-Obstructive Azoospermic Men: Does/Can It Improve Sperm Yield?
by Gary D. Smith, Clementina Cantatore and Dana A. Ohl
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(16), 3667; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163667 - 19 Aug 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3218
Abstract
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has allowed reproduction options through assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) for men with no spermatozoa within the ejaculate (azoospermia). In men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), the options for spermatozoa retrieval are testicular sperm extraction (TESE), testicular sperm aspiration (TESA), or [...] Read more.
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has allowed reproduction options through assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) for men with no spermatozoa within the ejaculate (azoospermia). In men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), the options for spermatozoa retrieval are testicular sperm extraction (TESE), testicular sperm aspiration (TESA), or micro-surgical sperm extraction (microTESE). At the initial time of spermatozoa removal from the testis, spermatozoa are immobile. Independent of the means of spermatozoa retrieval, the subsequent steps of removing spermatozoa from seminiferous tubules, determining spermatozoa viability, identifying enough spermatozoa for oocyte injections, and isolating viable spermatozoa for injection are currently performed manually by laboratory microscopic dissection and collection. These laboratory techniques are highly labor-intensive, with yield unknown, have an unpredictable efficiency and/or success rate, and are subject to inter-laboratory personnel and intra-laboratory variability. Here, we consider the potential utility, benefits, and shortcomings of developing technologies such as motility induction/stimulants, microfluidics, dielectrophoresis, and cell sorting as andrological laboratory add-ons to reduce the technical burdens and variabilities in viable spermatozoa isolation from testicular samples in men with NOA. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 228 KB  
Communication
Effect of Microfluidic Sperm Separation vs. Standard Sperm Washing Processes on Laboratory Outcomes and Clinical Pregnancy Rates in an Unselected Patient Population
by Chelsey A. Leisinger, Glen Adaniya, Melanie R. Freeman, Erica J. Behnke, Martha Aguirre, Matthew D. VerMilyea and Mitchel C. Schiewe
Reprod. Med. 2021, 2(3), 125-130; https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed2030013 - 26 Jul 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 9820
Abstract
A prospective, multicenter, randomized, sibling oocyte study was conducted with 86 couples to evaluate if a microfluidic sperm separation device improved ICSI sperm selection and subsequent cycle outcomes of fertilization, blastocyst utilization, ploidy, and clinical pregnancy rate when applied to a general patient [...] Read more.
A prospective, multicenter, randomized, sibling oocyte study was conducted with 86 couples to evaluate if a microfluidic sperm separation device improved ICSI sperm selection and subsequent cycle outcomes of fertilization, blastocyst utilization, ploidy, and clinical pregnancy rate when applied to a general patient population. Patients with at least 10 metaphase II oocytes were enrolled in the study and sibling oocyte groups were split in half. One half of the oocytes underwent ICSI with the control processed sperm and the other half were injected with sperm sorted by the ZyMōt microfluidic sperm separation device. Fertilization rate was recorded and resulting blastocysts were biopsied and evaluated for ploidy status with NGS. Euploid, non-mosaic embryos were randomly selected for single embryo transfer. A total of 787 oocytes were evaluated in the ZyMōt group and 777 in the control group. No statistical differences were observed between ZyMōt and control processing methods in any of the study outcomes evaluated. It is possible that the selection of normal, progressive sperm for ICSI, and the repair capacity of oocytes are sufficient to promote normal embryonic development in the general infertility population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Embryo Technologies Management)
19 pages, 3389 KB  
Review
A Review on Microfluidics: An Aid to Assisted Reproductive Technology
by Anand Baby Alias, Hong-Yuan Huang and Da-Jeng Yao
Molecules 2021, 26(14), 4354; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144354 - 19 Jul 2021
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 8099
Abstract
Infertility is a state of the male or female reproductive system that is defined as the failure to achieve pregnancy even after 12 or more months of regular unprotected sexual intercourse. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) plays a crucial role in addressing infertility. Various [...] Read more.
Infertility is a state of the male or female reproductive system that is defined as the failure to achieve pregnancy even after 12 or more months of regular unprotected sexual intercourse. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) plays a crucial role in addressing infertility. Various ART are now available for infertile couples. Fertilization in vitro (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) are the most common techniques in this regard. Various microfluidic technologies can incorporate various ART procedures such as embryo and gamete (sperm and oocyte) analysis, sorting, manipulation, culture and monitoring. Hence, this review intends to summarize the current knowledge about the application of this approach towards cell biology to enhance ART. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4625 KB  
Review
Recent Microfluidic Innovations for Sperm Sorting
by Maedeh Khodamoradi, Saeed Rafizadeh Tafti, Seyed Ali Mousavi Shaegh, Behrouz Aflatoonian, Mostafa Azimzadeh and Patricia Khashayar
Chemosensors 2021, 9(6), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors9060126 - 1 Jun 2021
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 11213
Abstract
Sperm selection is a clinical need for guided fertilization in men with low-quality semen. In this regard, microfluidics can provide an enabling platform for the precise manipulation and separation of high-quality sperm cells through applying various stimuli, including chemical agents, mechanical forces, and [...] Read more.
Sperm selection is a clinical need for guided fertilization in men with low-quality semen. In this regard, microfluidics can provide an enabling platform for the precise manipulation and separation of high-quality sperm cells through applying various stimuli, including chemical agents, mechanical forces, and thermal gradients. In addition, microfluidic platforms can help to guide sperms and oocytes for controlled in vitro fertilization or sperm sorting using both passive and active methods. Herein, we present a detailed review of the use of various microfluidic methods for sorting and categorizing sperms for different applications. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are further discussed and future perspectives in the field are given. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microfluidic Biosensing Platform)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 802 KB  
Review
Game-Changing Approaches in Sperm Sex-Sorting: Microfluidics and Nanotechnology
by Andra-Sabina Neculai-Valeanu and Adina Mirela Ariton
Animals 2021, 11(4), 1182; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041182 - 20 Apr 2021
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 13150
Abstract
The utilization of sex-sorted sperm for artificial insemination and in-vitro fertilization is considered a valuable tool for improving production efficiency and optimizing reproductive management in farm animals, subsequently ensuring sufficient food resource for the growing human population. Despite the fact that sperm sex-sorting [...] Read more.
The utilization of sex-sorted sperm for artificial insemination and in-vitro fertilization is considered a valuable tool for improving production efficiency and optimizing reproductive management in farm animals, subsequently ensuring sufficient food resource for the growing human population. Despite the fact that sperm sex-sorting is one of the most intense studied technologies and notable progress have been made in the past three decades to optimize it, the conception rates when using sex-sorted semen are still under expectations. Assisted reproduction programs may benefit from the use of emergent nano and microfluidic-based technologies. This article addresses the currently used methods for sperm sex-sorting, as well as the emerging ones, based on nanotechnology and microfluidics emphasizing on their practical and economic applicability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biotechnologies Applied to Animal Reproduction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 4104 KB  
Article
Supervised Learning to Predict Sperm Sorting by Magnetophoresis
by James Boon Yong Koh, Xinhui Shen and Marcos
Magnetochemistry 2018, 4(3), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry4030031 - 2 Jul 2018
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 5153
Abstract
Machine learning is gaining popularity in the commercial world, but its benefits are yet to be well-utilised by many in the microfluidics community. There is immense potential in bridging the gap between applied engineering and artificial intelligence as well as statistics. We illustrate [...] Read more.
Machine learning is gaining popularity in the commercial world, but its benefits are yet to be well-utilised by many in the microfluidics community. There is immense potential in bridging the gap between applied engineering and artificial intelligence as well as statistics. We illustrate this by a case study investigating the sorting of sperm cells for assisted reproduction. Slender body theory (SBT) is applied to compute the behavior of sperm subjected to magnetophoresis, with due consideration given to statistical variations. By performing computations on a small subset of the generated data, we train an ensemble of four supervised learning algorithms and use it to make predictions on the velocity of each sperm. Our results suggest that magnetophoresis can magnify the difference between normal and abnormal cells, such that a sorted sample has over twice the proportion of desirable cells. In addition, we demonstrated that the predictions from machine learning gave comparable results with significantly lower computational costs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Magnetic Fields in Microfluidic Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop