Search Results (293)

Integrating BIM curriculum into traditional construction management (CM) programs is essential to meet the increasing industry demand for BIM-ready graduates. However, academia struggles with BIM curriculum integration due to unfamiliar emerging BIM technologies, and the increased workload associated with curriculum transformation. Disciplines including nursing, health science, and medical overcame the same challenges using the ability-desire-knowledge-ability-reinforcement (ADKAR) change management model, while CM programs have not explored this model for BIM curriculum development. Thus, this research introduces the ADKAR change management lens to BIM curriculum development by proposing a practically modified and replicable ADKAR model for CM programs. Focus group interviews with 14 academics from the UK, USA, Korea, and Australia, revealed establishing a sense of urgency by appointing a BIM champion is the most critical step before the BIM curriculum development. Instant advice demystifying uncertain BIM concepts is recognised the most effective motivation among academia. Well-balanced BIM concept integrations is ‘sine qua non’ since excessively saturating BIM aspects across the program can dilute students’ essential domain knowledge. Students’ evaluation over the BIM curriculum were collected through a six-year longitudinal focus group interviews, revealing that progressive BIM learnings scaffolded from foundational concepts to advanced applications throughout their coursework is the most valuable. Full article

Introduction: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs), especially those from underserved communities, often face barriers to sexual and reproductive health (SRH). This pilot study evaluated the implementation of mobile health technologies to promote SRH care, including the integration of the Rapid Adolescent Prevention Screening^TM (RAAPS) and the Health-E You/Salud iTu^TM (Health-E You) app at a School-Based Health Center (SBHC) in Los Angeles using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework. Methods: This multi-method pilot study included the implementation of an integrated tool with two components, the RAAPS electronic health screening tool and the Health-E You app, which delivers tailored SRH education and contraceptive decision support to patients (who were sex-assigned as female at birth) and provides an electronic summary to clinicians to better prepare them for the visit with their patient. Quantitative data on tool usage were collected directly from the back-end data storage for the apps, and qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews and in-clinic observations. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify implementation barriers and facilitators. Results: Between April 2024 and June 2024, 60 unique patients (14–19 years of age) had a healthcare visit. Of these, 35.00% used the integrated RAAPS/Health-E You app, and 88.33% completed the Health-E You app only. All five clinic staff were interviewed and expressed that they valued the tools for their educational impact, noting that they enhanced SRH discussions and helped uncover sensitive information that students might not disclose face-to-face. However, the tools affected clinic workflows and caused rooming delays due to the time-intensive setup process and lack of integration with the clinic’s primary electronic medical record system. In addition, they also reported that the time to complete the screener and app within the context of a 30-min appointment limited the time available for direct patient care. Additionally, staff reported that some students struggled with the two-step process and did not complete all components of the tool. Despite these challenges, clinic staff strongly supported renewing the RAAPS license and continued use of the Health-E You app, emphasizing the platform’s potential for improving SRH care and its educational value. Conclusions: The integrated RAAPS and Health-E You app platform demonstrated educational value and improved SRH care but faced operational and technical barriers in implementing the tool. These findings emphasize the potential of such tools to address SRH disparities among vulnerable AYAs while providing a framework for future implementations in SBHCs. Full article

Background/Objectives: Generating real-world data on the efficacy of multidisciplinary care in cardiometabolic risk management is essential to ensure that guidelines are both applicable and effective, especially in public healthcare settings, where organizational structures may impede healthcare professionals’ agility. This study aimed to generate data on patient follow-up and cardiometabolic risk management during the early years of a public university family medicine group in Québec (Canada) that provides multidisciplinary care to adults with cardiometabolic conditions, in order to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of its care model. Methods: This was a retrospective longitudinal study. Patients treated at the clinic from 31 January 2020 (clinic opening) to 8 May 2024 (n = 96) were invited to consent to the use of their medical data for research. Results: A total of 52 patients consented and were included in the study. Upon entry at the clinic, >90% of patients had anthropometry and blood pressure (BP) measured, but plasma glucose and lipids were assessed among 50% and 79% of patients, respectively. A total of 36 patients completed the personalized multidisciplinary care program. No evidence of associations between the total number of appointments or appointments with the registered dietitian specifically with changes in BMI, waist circumference, and BP was found. However, each pharmaceutical intervention was associated with a −0.51 cm (95%CI: −1.03, 0.02; p = 0.06) change in waist circumference and a −1.49 mm Hg (95%CI: −2.56, −0.43, p = 0.01) change in diastolic BP. Conclusions: These data highlight the challenges of implementing a research-oriented clinic within Québec’s public healthcare system. Full article

Background/Objectives: In Germany, the provision of healthcare for post-COVID patients primarily lies with general practitioners (GPs), who often lack the necessary knowledge and skills. As part of the PostCovidCare pilot study (PCC), case management software incorporating a symptom diary was introduced and piloted in n = 10 GP practices with n = 33 included patients involved (September 2022–March 2023). This study aimed to explore patients’ experiences. Methods: Semi-structured telephone interviews were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. A total of n = 10 patient interviews were conducted (July–September 2023). Results: Patients’ experiences were heterogeneous. The service was largely structured, involving an extensive initial assessment, follow-up appointments, questionnaires, and support from medical assistants, but technical problems with the symptom diary occurred. The GP consultation played a prominent role. Positive aspects included being actively asked about their symptoms, being given a lot of time, initiating diagnostic and therapeutic measures, and having a closer relationship with their GP. Negative aspects included the time taken, resulting exhaustion, duplication of efforts, and insufficient involvement in the consultation process. Conclusions: The pilot study conducted at an early stage of the post-COVID era demonstrated the basic feasibility of case management in primary care from patients’ perspectives. In addition, for future projects, it is important to integrate patients into the design from the outset, adapt the software to users’ needs, and consider care providers’ perspectives. Full article

Background: Understanding patient perceptions of cancer care is crucial for improving treatment experiences and health outcomes. This study explores female patient-reported experiences with cancer care. Our aim was to identify areas for improvement and enhance patient-centered approaches in specialty and primary care settings. Methods: This was a prospective observational study using ResearchMatch. Our eligibility criteria were 40 years or older adult cancer diagnosis, female, and treated for cancer in the United States. Results: Among the eligible participants (n = 1224), 64 responded to the invitation and 57 completed the survey (89% participation proportion). The majority of the respondents were not receiving treatment during the study period (68%). Of those, 89% completed the recommended treatment, and 10% stopped the treatment before completion. Nearly 80% of respondents saw the same oncologist during the treatment at every appointment, and only 8% reported changing clinicians during their primary cancer treatment. Over 63% of respondents were not seeing the same primary care clinician as they did when they were first diagnosed. Respondents reported facing challenges with employment and ability to return to work (26%), being able to afford medication (21%), and paying medical bills (15%). Discussion: This study, albeit for a small number of participants (n = 57) identified strengths and challenges in cancer care. Consistent oncologist involvement and proximity to care centers was consistently reported during active treatment. Discontinuity with primary care, however, may warrant further inquiry. Reported financial, employment and access issues support previous studies that identified these as major challenges during and after active cancer treatment. Our study underscored the need to enhance patient-centered coordination and support to improve cancer and survivorship care outcomes. Full article

Background: With advancements in Generative Artificial Intelligence, various industries have made substantial efforts to integrate this technology to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of existing processes or identify potential weaknesses. Context, however, remains a crucial factor in leveraging intelligence, especially in high-stakes sectors such as healthcare, where contextual understanding can lead to life-changing outcomes. Objective: This research aims to develop a practical medical multi-agent system framework capable of automating appointment scheduling and triage classification, thus improving operational efficiency in healthcare settings. Methods: We present MedScrubCrew, a multi-agent framework integrating established technologies: Gale-Shapley stable matching algorithm for optimal patient-provider allocation, knowledge graphs for semantic compatibility profiling, and specialized large language model-based agents. The framework is designed to emulate the collaborative decision making processes typical of medical teams. Results: Our evaluation demonstrates that combining these components within a cohesive multi-agent architecture substantially enhances operational efficiency, task completeness, and contextual relevance in healthcare scheduling workflows. Conclusions:MedScrubCrew provides a practical, implementable blueprint for healthcare automation, addressing significant inefficiencies in real-world appointment scheduling and patient triage scenarios. Full article

Background and Objectives: In Germany, access to medical care is often hindered by long wait times for specialist appointments and emergency department care. Inappropriate utilization of emergency services further exacerbates delays for truly urgent cases. To evaluate the utilization of the statutory ophthalmic emergency service in Freiburg and identify patient- and system-level factors contributing to inappropriate use. Materials and Methods: A paper-based, anonymous questionnaire was distributed to patients attending the ophthalmologic emergency practice (Notfallpraxis) of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (Kassenärztliche Vereinigung), which is located within the premises of the Eye Center of the University Hospital Freiburg, Germany, at selected periods between July and September 2020, alongside a short physician assessment. Standardized instruments were used to assess symptom severity, urgency perception, and healthcare-seeking behavior. Statistical analyses were performed using R and Excel. Results: A total of 157 questionnaires were included (response rate: 63%). Most visits occurred on weekends (47%) and before 10 p.m. (83%). While 68% of patients believed their symptoms required same-day treatment, physicians assessed only 30% of cases as clinically urgent. A total of 60% of patients did not attempt to contact an outpatient ophthalmologist beforehand, and only 38% reported having a regular ophthalmologist. Patients’ perceived urgency was significantly associated with symptom severity and older age, whereas physician-assessed urgency was strongly linked to symptom duration. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of ophthalmic emergency visits in Freiburg are for non-urgent conditions. These findings underscore the need for improved coordination with outpatient care providers, better patient education, and structural reforms to reduce inappropriate utilization and ensure timely access for truly urgent cases. Full article

Background/Objectives: Missed outpatient appointments contribute to care discontinuity and emergency department (ED) overcrowding. This study investigated the association between missed appointments and ED visits, identifying predictors such as patient characteristics, distance from the hospital, and waiting time. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using a dataset of 749,450 scheduled outpatient appointments from adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years). Patients under 18 were excluded. We identified missed appointments and assessed their association with ED visits occurring in the same period. Descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, and logistic and linear regression models were applied to examine predictors such as age, sex, distance from the hospital, waiting time, the type of service, and medical specialty. Results: The overall no-show rate was 3.85%. Among patients with missed appointments, 37.3% also visited the ED. An older age (OR = 1.007; p = 0.006) and the male gender (OR = 1.498; p < 0.001) were significant predictors of having a scheduled appointment before an ED visit. No significant associations were found for distance or specialty branch. Conclusions: Missed appointments are associated with ED utilization. Predictive factors can inform targeted interventions, such as via improved scheduling systems and personalized reminders. Distance alone may not be a barrier, but system-level solutions are needed to address no-show rates and optimize healthcare resource use. Full article

Background: This study evaluates one of the five regions of the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, as part of a broader research project examining users’ perceptions of the Unified Health System (SUS), which has already generated publications in previous phases. The aim was to assess users’ perceptions of the SUS regarding access to and the quality of public health services, including pharmaceutical services, in the Metropolitan Region of Rio de Janeiro State. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted between January and August 2024 with 200 participants, using a 66-item survey addressing access to and the quality of SUS services, appointment scheduling, medication acquisition, and the pharmacist’s role. Associations between variables were investigated using the Pearson Chi-Square Test in R software. Results: Frequent SUS users rated access as very good/good (p = 0.002) and overall quality as very good/good (p = 0.045). Reported challenges included the need for improved infrastructure (48.5%), better professional qualifications (30.6%), and easier access to medicines (16.8%). Higher ratings were given by those who used the SUS more frequently, and, in general, there was a tendency for participants with lower socioeconomic conditions to provide more favorable assessments of access to public health services (p = 0.024). Conclusions: A universal health system should cover diverse regions with unique needs. However, 49.4% of participants stated they never received information on how to store their medicines, and 42.3% reported never encountering a pharmacist in public pharmacies. Further ongoing studies assessing user perceptions are essential to ensure users play a central role in health decision-making, contributing to the system’s strengthening and improvement. Full article

Introduction: The rapid growth of mobile health (mHealth) applications has revolutionized healthcare delivery worldwide. These digital tools encompass a broad array of functionalities, including telemedicine, appointment scheduling, medication management, and health data tracking, all of which contribute to enhanced healthcare accessibility, increased patient engagement, and improved operational efficiency. However, despite their increasing prominence, the design, deployment, and use of mHealth applications continue to face several challenges, such as usability issues and overall sustained adoption. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate mHealth applications in Saudi Arabia, focusing on their design characteristics, usability features, and current feature gaps. Method: A total of 21 mHealth applications were selected and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. The apps were selected based on usage popularity in the Saudi market and relevance to national digital health strategies. Data were drawn from publicly available app store information, official app documentation, and expert evaluations. Results: The findings reveal that while mHealth applications excel in areas such as telemedicine, appointment booking, and health education, there are notable gaps in features such as behavior modification, patient monitoring, and health management. Conclusions: This study contributes to the growing body of research on mHealth by offering grounded insights into the functional landscape of digital health tools in Saudi Arabia. It also outlines practical recommendations to enhance usability, feature diversity, and alignment with evolving healthcare needs in Saudi Arabia and beyond. Full article

Sensory processing disorder (SPD) involves difficulties in receiving and responding to sensory information from the environment. Their development is influenced by various factors during the perinatal period and early childhood. Children with sensory integration disorders often struggle with everyday situations and stress, typically experiencing either sensory hypersensitivity or hyposensitivity. Their visit to a doctor’s office presents challenges for both the child and the medical practitioner, requiring active cooperation from parents. This review aims to analyze the challenges faced by clinicians in managing pediatric patients with SPD during healthcare visits, with a specific focus on dental settings and to propose effective communication and management strategies. Proper preparation of the child before the visit and the use of appropriate communication techniques during the appointment play a crucial role in ensuring a smooth experience. Strategies such as minimizing visual and auditory stimuli, applying recommended touch techniques, and opting for the least invasive treatment methods can help create a child-friendly environment and improve the overall quality of care. Full article

Background/Objectives: Although there is a general consensus that patients should have dental evaluation before heart valve surgery, data on the extent and complications of this evaluation are scarce. The objective was to analyze safety and feasibility of dental evaluation in patients undergoing heart valve surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients referred for dental evaluation prior to heart valve surgery in 2021–2023 was conducted. Demographic, medical, and dental data were recorded. The number and type of dental procedures and their complications were recorded, along with the number of appointments and the time required to achieve dental clearance for heart valve surgery. Results: One hundred and fifty-three patients were referred in the observed period. The predominant procedure was tooth extraction, accounting for 76 (49.7%) cases. Complications were recorded in 3 (1.9%) patients, with delayed bleeding being the most prevalent issue, occurring in 2 (1.3%) patients. The median time required to obtain dental clearance for cardiosurgical procedure was 1 day, with 124 (81%) patients obtaining clearance in a single appointment. No dental emergencies were observed during hospital admission for the cardiosurgical procedure. Conclusions: Our results suggest that dental evaluation before heart valve surgery can be conducted in a reasonable amount of time with a low complication rate and without the need to delay cardiosurgical procedures. Full article

In the current clinical psychiatric practice in most of the world, treatment decisions are based on a person’s capacity to make these decisions. When a person lacks the capacity to understand and appreciate treatment decisions, in many jurisdictions a third-party substitute decision maker (SDM) is appointed on his or her behalf in order to promote safety and optimal clinical outcome. In Ontario, Canada, for example, family members (typically) or public guardians are appointed as SDMs, and they form an integral part of the medical–legal system in psychiatric care. Clinicians working with both patients and their SDMs in these circumstances encounter unique challenges and deliver care in specialized ways, though little research has focused on their experiences and reflections. Based on focus group data, this qualitative study uses a descriptive and interpretative phenomenological approach through thematic analysis to examine these aspects from clinicians working in both inpatient and outpatient settings of an urban teaching hospital’s psychiatric services in Toronto, Canada. Seven key themes emerged: Clinicians (1) appreciate hardships and challenges in lives of SDMs and patients—including the challenging emotions and experiences on both sides, and the risks and relational changes from being an SDM; (2) have an understanding of the patient’s situation and respect for patient autonomy and wishes—they are promoter of autonomy and mindful of patients’ prior wishes amidst patients’ fluctuating capacity, facilitating communication, keeping patients informed and promoting transitioning from SDM to self-determination; (3) have a special working relationship with family SDMs—including supporting SDMs, avoiding harm from delayed or denied treatment, and educating and collaborating with SDMs while maintaining professional boundaries; (4) at times find it difficult working with SDMs—stemming from working with over-involved or uninterested family SDMs, coping with perceived poor SDM decisions, and they sometimes ponder if SDMs are necessary; (5) delineate differences between family and Public Guardian and Trustee (PGT) SDMs—they see PGT as closely aligned with medical decision makers, while family SDMs are more intimately involved and more likely to disagree with a physician’s recommendation; (6) recognize the importance of the SDM role in various contexts—through seeing social values in having SDMs, and acknowledging that having SDMS help them to feel better about their actions as they work to protect the patients; and (7) express ideas on how to improve the current system—at public, societal, and family SDM levels. We conclude that clinicians have unique mediating roles, with privilege and responsibility in understanding the different roles and challenges patients and SDMs face, and have opportunities to improve patient and SDM experiences, clinical outcomes, carry out education, and advocate for ethically just decisions. These clinical roles also come with frustration, discomfort, moral distress and at times vicarious trauma. Clinicians’ unique understanding of this complex and nuanced intersection of patient care provides insight into the core issues of autonomy, duty to care and protect, advocacy, and emotional dynamics involved in this sector as a larger philosophical and social movement to abolish SDMs, as advocated by the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disability (CRPD), is taking place. We briefly discuss the role of supported decision making as an alternative as. Full article

Background: We recently reported that the transcutaneous bilirubinometer (TCB) tends to underestimate the severity of neonatal jaundice (NJ). We hypothesize that the cumulative ambient light exposure contributes to the discrepancy. Objectives: This study aimed to identify factors that affect the TCB underestimation. Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected data over a twenty-month period at a level III medical facility. Neonates at risk for NJ who couldn’t secure an appointment with the primary practitioner were followed by the nursery team. Neonates who had phototherapy or forehead bruises were excluded. Concurrently collected total serum bilirubin (TSB) was determined by the diazo method. The primary endpoint was the discrepancy between TCB and the corresponding TSB (TCB-TSB). A mixed-effects model was used to assess the correlation between (TCB-TSB) and potential contributors, including visit age (in hours), gestational age (GA), sex, TSB, season, birth weight, and race. Results: There were 795 visits for 559 neonates, including 341 males, 179 white, 235 black, 103 Hispanic, 41 Asian, and one unrecorded race. The TSB ranged between 1.8 and 33.9 mg/dL. The (TCB-TSB) ranged between −20.0 and 6.4 mg/dL. The median GA and birth weight were 38.7 weeks and 3214.5 g. The visits occurred between 48 and 381 h of age. 133, 148, 132, and 146 visits were in Spring, Summer, Autumn, and Winter, respectively. Fifty-four neonates (9.7%) were admitted for management. 500 sternum TCB readings were also collected from 350 neonates together with the corresponding forehead TCBs. We found that the forehead (TCB-TSB) was significantly less in winter than in spring and summer (p = 0.0014 and 0.0003, respectively). There was a negative correlation between forehead (TCB-TSB) and visit age in hours (p = 0.0006). After adjusting for visit age and season, the (TCB-TSB) is significantly correlated with TSB (p < 0.0001). Similar findings were also seen in the sternum (TCB-TSB) except for the season (p = 0.0808). Conclusions: Cumulative ambient light exposure and the severity of NJ may contribute to (TCB-TSB). Full article

Patients represent the primary stakeholders in health systems, making it crucial to enhance their level of satisfaction. The relationship between physician and patient is crucial during treatment, especially for patients dealing with long-term issues. Generally, every illness has the potential to cause high levels of stress, leading to varying reactions from individuals, influenced by factors such as age, personality, relationships with caregivers, treatment environment, and specific disease characteristics. As the healthcare provider acquires a more profound insight into how the disease affects the patient’s quality of life, the relationship between the patient and the physician evolves. In this study, we analyzed information from hospital clinics that took part in the survey for the same timeframe, from July 2019 to December 2020. Correlated data were derived from two separate surveys. The initial survey, created by Spector, focused on gathering feedback from health professionals in hospitals, with 3278 responses collected. A second survey was designed to gather feedback from patients in hospitals, with 2851 responses collected. The survey revealed a total of 97 common observations among physicians and patients in the hospital clinics. According to the findings from the two-stage least squares (2SLS) regression analysis, an essential method for researchers addressing endogeneity challenges in structural equation modeling, an increase of 1 point in the job satisfaction of physicians is associated with a corresponding positive increase of 1.12 points in patient satisfaction. At the heart of effective healthcare is the relationship between physicians and patients. Positive attitudes from patients during medical appointments help improve health outcomes, especially for those with long-term illnesses. In order to encourage patients to take an active role, physicians need to focus on enhancing the physician-patient bond, humaneness, creating trust and stable communication, encouraging the sharing of information, and empowering patients to participate in decision-making. Full article