Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (274)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = macrophage plasticity

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
39 pages, 2619 KB  
Review
Reprogramming Inflammatory Macrophages with Specialized Pro-Resolving Lipid Mediators: A Novel Immunotherapeutic Strategy for Asthma
by Ruchita Tanu, Ashraf A. Qurtam, Gagan Prakash, Anis Ahmad Chaudhary, Nadeem Raza, Pushpender K. Sharma, Sudarshan Singh Lakhawat, Tejpal Yadav, Monika Kaushik and Vikram Kumar
Biomedicines 2026, 14(7), 1432; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14071432 (registering DOI) - 24 Jun 2026
Abstract
Asthma is defined as a chronic airway inflammatory disorder with over-activation of the immune system accompanied by the inability to resolve inflammation. SPMs are novel potent lipid mediators that play an important role in maintaining inflammation homeostasis and macrophages’ functional plasticity. This review [...] Read more.
Asthma is defined as a chronic airway inflammatory disorder with over-activation of the immune system accompanied by the inability to resolve inflammation. SPMs are novel potent lipid mediators that play an important role in maintaining inflammation homeostasis and macrophages’ functional plasticity. This review will look into the potential function of SPM-programmed macrophage reprogramming as a novel therapeutic strategy for asthma. Unlike current anti-inflammatory treatments, which only focus on suppressing inflammation, SPMs can actively drive the inflammation resolution phase by promoting efferocytosis and wound healing while maintaining the defense against infection. In experimental asthma animal models, lipoxins, resolvins, protectins, and maresins have been demonstrated to alleviate inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness, shift macrophages towards pro-resolving phenotypes and thus facilitate the resolution process. Levels of some SPM subclasses were found to be reduced in severe or uncontrolled asthmatics, indicating defective resolution pathways may contribute to asthma persistence. The mechanisms include down-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, alteration of macrophage phenotype, improvement of immune homeostasis in the airway milieu, etc. These molecules have become highly promising therapeutic agents after the development of metabolically stable analogs, receptor-targeted agonists, and an improved delivery system. Multi-omics studies coupled with patient stratification based on biomarkers will potentially help in the future to develop personalized resolution-based therapy, in particular for those steroid-resistant and non-type 2 asthmatics. Nevertheless, the evidence provided so far is mainly preclinical; more challenges in terms of pharmacokinetics, formulation and formulation development, regulatory agency approval, and clinical validation remain and will be overcome through further studies, thus warranting investigation into SPM-mediated strategies for asthma and other chronic inflammatory diseases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

40 pages, 4494 KB  
Review
The Serpin Superfamily in Adipose Tissue Remodeling: Molecular Drivers of Immune–Metabolic Crosstalk and Insulin Sensitivity
by Nouran Alwisi, Alaa Abdelhamid, Amna Al-Quradaghi, Maha Talhami, Aldana M. Alkuwari, Nadia Alsharif, Jessica Saliba and Abdullah A. Shaito
Biology 2026, 15(13), 989; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15130989 (registering DOI) - 23 Jun 2026
Abstract
Adipose tissue remodeling is a dynamic process essential for metabolic homeostasis, enabling tissue expansion, extracellular matrix (ECM) turnover, angiogenesis, and coordinated immune adaptation. In obesity, however, maladaptive remodeling characterized by fibrosis, chronic low-grade inflammation, and hypoxia disrupts adipose plasticity and promotes systemic insulin [...] Read more.
Adipose tissue remodeling is a dynamic process essential for metabolic homeostasis, enabling tissue expansion, extracellular matrix (ECM) turnover, angiogenesis, and coordinated immune adaptation. In obesity, however, maladaptive remodeling characterized by fibrosis, chronic low-grade inflammation, and hypoxia disrupts adipose plasticity and promotes systemic insulin resistance. Central to these processes is the tightly regulated homeostasis between proteases and their inhibitors, in which the serine protease inhibitor (serpin) superfamily represents an important yet underappreciated regulatory axis. Beyond their classical roles in coagulation and fibrinolysis, serpins regulate ECM remodeling, macrophage recruitment and polarization, cytokine signaling, angiogenic responses, adipokine activity, and insulin sensitivity, thereby orchestrating immune–metabolic crosstalk within adipose depots. Emerging evidence indicates that individual serpins exert distinct and context-dependent effects, with some promoting fibrosis, inflammation, and metabolic dysfunction, whereas others preserve adipose tissue homeostasis and metabolic function. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the structural and functional diversity of the serpin superfamily and examines their mechanistic roles in adipose tissue remodeling during obesity, with particular emphasis on how adipose-associated serpins regulate adipose tissue homeostasis, depot-specific remodeling, and immune–metabolic crosstalk. The review further discusses the experimental and translational applications of emerging single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, multi-omics, and computational approaches that may advance the understanding of serpin biology, improve the investigation of human adipose tissue, and accelerate the identification of clinically relevant serpin-related biomarkers and therapeutic targets for obesity and related metabolic disorders. By positioning serpins as key regulators of adipose tissue remodeling and immune–metabolic integration, this review highlights protease–antiprotease balance as a central determinant of metabolic health and identifies serpins as promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets for obesity and related metabolic disorders. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Biology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

27 pages, 2393 KB  
Review
CAR-M Therapy: From Concept to Clinical Translation in Solid Tumors
by Chenxi Miao, Zhitao Chen, Juan Chen, Jiazeng Sun, Yanan Sun, Wenbiao Shi, Wentao Xu, Yixuan Li and Xingwang Zhao
Cells 2026, 15(12), 1113; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15121113 (registering DOI) - 19 Jun 2026
Viewed by 276
Abstract
While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapies have shown significant effectiveness in hematological malignancies, their efficacy in solid tumors remains limited by the hostile tumor microenvironment (TME) and antigen heterogeneity. Recently, CAR-Macrophage (CAR-M) therapy has emerged as a paradigm-shifting approach, leveraging the innate capability [...] Read more.
While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapies have shown significant effectiveness in hematological malignancies, their efficacy in solid tumors remains limited by the hostile tumor microenvironment (TME) and antigen heterogeneity. Recently, CAR-Macrophage (CAR-M) therapy has emerged as a paradigm-shifting approach, leveraging the innate capability of macrophages to deeply infiltrate tumors and their plasticity to reverse immunosuppression. Unlike T cells, CAR-Ms not only mediate direct phagocytosis but also initiate epitope spreading, effectively bridging innate and adaptive immunity. This review critically examines the trajectory of CAR-M therapy from biological rationale to clinical reality. We dissect the engineering evolution of CAR constructs, arguing for macrophage-specific signaling domains (e.g., FcRγ, Megf10) over traditional T-cell designs. Crucially, we address the major bottlenecks in clinical translation, including the manufacturing challenges of non-expanding primary macrophages and the emerging shift toward induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived platforms. Furthermore, we evaluate current clinical trial landscapes and discuss next-generation strategies such as in vivo programming via lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and synthetic logic-gating to enhance safety. Ultimately, overcoming manufacturing constraints and optimizing delivery systems will be pivotal for CAR-M to evolve from a niche therapy into a standard-of-care modality for solid tumors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 8837 KB  
Article
Single-Cell Transcriptomic Profiling Reveals Immunometabolic Reprogramming and Cell-Cell Communication in the Tumor Microenvironment of Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma
by Miguel Ángel Díaz-Campos and Enrique Hernández-Lemus
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(12), 5397; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27125397 - 15 Jun 2026
Viewed by 187
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is sustained by coordinated interactions among malignant hepatocytes, immune cells, and stromal populations that collectively drive tumor growth, immune evasion, and vascular remodeling. Using integrative single-cell transcriptomics on 93,032 cells from tumor and healthy human liver, we characterized cell-type-specific transcriptional [...] Read more.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is sustained by coordinated interactions among malignant hepatocytes, immune cells, and stromal populations that collectively drive tumor growth, immune evasion, and vascular remodeling. Using integrative single-cell transcriptomics on 93,032 cells from tumor and healthy human liver, we characterized cell-type-specific transcriptional programs underlying immunometabolic reprogramming and reconstructed the intercellular communication circuits that maintain the tumor microenvironment. Malignant hepatocytes displayed upregulation of genes encoding both glycolytic and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) metabolic enzymes, consistent with metabolic plasticity, while concurrently suppressing genes involved in antigen presentation—a transcriptional pattern indicative of coordinated metabolic and immune-evasive reprogramming. Tumor-associated macrophages acquired TREM2-enriched, lipid-handling phenotypes consistent with immunosuppressive polarization, and tumor endothelial cells upregulated angiocrine and extracellular matrix programs while silencing innate immune outputs. Ligand–receptor inference revealed a qualitative rewiring of intercellular communication: the antigen-presentation-centered network of the healthy liver was replaced by a tumor-driven architecture dominated by pro-angiogenic, ECM–integrin, inflammatory chemokine, and lipid-associated signaling circuits, with malignant hepatocytes, TAMs, and TECs collectively assuming the dominant signaling burden. These findings establish that HCC progression is an emergent property of a stabilized multicellular network, rather than the autonomous behavior of malignant cells, and define cooperative immunometabolic modules that constitute tractable targets for combinatorial therapeutic intervention. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

62 pages, 5991 KB  
Review
Macrophage Plasticity: Phenotypic and Functional Profiles Across Pathological Microenvironments
by Alessandra Falda
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(12), 5333; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27125333 - 12 Jun 2026
Viewed by 353
Abstract
Macrophages are highly plastic innate immune cells that adopt context-dependent phenotypes along a continuum, integrating developmental origin with local microenvironmental cues rather than conforming to discrete M1/M2 states. This review delineates the molecular circuits shaping macrophage identity—TLR/cytokine signaling, microRNA networks, metabolic rewiring, and [...] Read more.
Macrophages are highly plastic innate immune cells that adopt context-dependent phenotypes along a continuum, integrating developmental origin with local microenvironmental cues rather than conforming to discrete M1/M2 states. This review delineates the molecular circuits shaping macrophage identity—TLR/cytokine signaling, microRNA networks, metabolic rewiring, and epigenetic mechanisms including histone lactylation—and traces how circulating monocyte subsets contribute to tissue macrophage diversity. We examine macrophage plasticity across a broad disease spectrum—oncology, autoimmune and rheumatic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, infectious diseases, metabolic disorders, and neurological conditions—showing that the pathogenic phenotype is strikingly context-dependent: for instance, M2-like tumor-associated macrophages promote immune evasion in solid tumors, whereas M1-skewed programs drive tissue damage in autoimmunity. Soluble markers (sCD163, sCD14, soluble mannose receptor) are emerging biomarkers of disease activity and prognosis. High-dimensional flow cytometry and mass cytometry (CyTOF) bridge molecular biology and clinical phenotyping, enabling integrated readouts of surface phenotype, intracellular signaling, and metabolic state. Therapeutic strategies discussed include selective tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) reprogramming, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-M cell therapies, and biomaterial-based platforms. Future priorities encompass spatially resolved multi-omics, epigenetic and metabolic targeting, and macrophage-centered vaccine approaches. Standardized cytometry panels will be essential for biomarker-guided stratification and context-specific interventions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flow Cytometry: Applications and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 141239 KB  
Article
SIRT2 Alleviates Chronic Cold Stress-Induced Lung Injury by Regulating Lung Macrophage M1 Polarization
by Bin Xu, Shizhen Lu, Rongge Xia, Qi Han, Zhiqi Zhu, Xinpeng Chen, Huiying Shi, Wencong Wu, Wanqun Xing and Jingjing Lu
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2026, 48(6), 543; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48060543 - 22 May 2026
Viewed by 216
Abstract
SIRT2 (Sirtuin 2) is an NAD+-dependent deacetylase that exerts crucial regulatory effects on immune homeostasis and macrophage activation. While chronic cold exposure is a known predisposing factor for pulmonary dysfunction, the precise mechanisms by which SIRT2 potentially modulates lung macrophage polarization under cold [...] Read more.
SIRT2 (Sirtuin 2) is an NAD+-dependent deacetylase that exerts crucial regulatory effects on immune homeostasis and macrophage activation. While chronic cold exposure is a known predisposing factor for pulmonary dysfunction, the precise mechanisms by which SIRT2 potentially modulates lung macrophage polarization under cold stress remains poorly understood. In this study, we evaluated the protective capacity of SIRT2 using both wild-type (WT) and Sirt2-knockout (Sirt2−/−) murine models subjected to chronic cold exposure (4 °C for 3 h daily over 21 days). Our results demonstrated that Sirt2 deficiency significantly exacerbated cold-induced pulmonary histopathological damage and increased the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, chronic cold stress triggered a macrophage-centered inflammatory response, a process wherein SIRT2 was found to curtail M1 pro-inflammatory polarization. To further investigate these mechanisms, in vitro experiments were conducted using the mouse alveolar macrophage cell line MH-S. While LPS was utilized as a canonical inflammatory stimulus to mimic the injury environment, SIRT2 overexpression was found to reverse the LPS-induced increase in M1 markers and attenuate inflammatory cytokine secretion. These findings suggest that SIRT2 maintains intracellular homeostasis by modulating macrophage plasticity and plays a protective role in the development of chronic cold stimulus-induced lung injury. Consequently, SIRT2 activation may represent a potential therapeutic pathway for the treatment of environment-related respiratory diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

43 pages, 2048 KB  
Review
Organoids to Model Tumor Microenvironment in Progression of Pathogenesis and Treatment Resistance in Glioblastoma Multiforme
by Pranav Kalaga and Swapan K. Ray
Brain Sci. 2026, 16(5), 531; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16050531 - 18 May 2026
Viewed by 842
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains the most aggressive and therapeutically intractable primary brain tumor, with many patients experiencing rapid relapse despite maximal surgical resection followed by standard chemoradiation. This persistent failure reflects the convergence of profound tumor-intrinsic genetic heterogeneity and a highly dynamic, spatially [...] Read more.
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains the most aggressive and therapeutically intractable primary brain tumor, with many patients experiencing rapid relapse despite maximal surgical resection followed by standard chemoradiation. This persistent failure reflects the convergence of profound tumor-intrinsic genetic heterogeneity and a highly dynamic, spatially structured, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Together, these forces create strong selective pressures that fuel tumor evolution, intratumoral diversity, phenotype plasticity, diffuse invasion, and robust resistance to therapy. The TME of GBM is orchestrated through a complex interplay between diverse cellular constituents, including tumor-associated macrophages, reactive astrocytes, endothelial cells, pericytes, and GBM stem cells, and non-cellular components such as extracellular matrix remodeling, hypoxia, metabolic and nutrient gradients, and spatially patterned cytokine and chemokine signaling networks. Additionally, heterogeneity in blood–brain barrier (BBB) and blood–tumor barrier (BTB) complicates drug delivery and immune surveillance, reinforcing therapeutic resistance and regional tumor adaptation. Conventional two-dimensional cell cultures and animal models fail to sufficiently capture these multiscale, patient-specific interactions, limiting their translational predictive power. In this narrative review, we synthesize recent advances in GBM organoid technologies as physiologically relevant, three-dimensional platforms that more faithfully recapitulate TME for driving tumor evolution and treatment resistance. We compare complementary organoid strategies, including patient-derived GBM organoids that preserve native cytoarchitecture, cerebral organoid co-culture systems that reconstruct tumor–brain interactions, and advanced platforms incorporating immune and vascular features such as air–liquid interface cultures, microglia-enriched systems, and BBB/BTB-integrated models. Finally, we highlight emerging innovations such as spatial transcriptomics, organoid-on-a-chip systems, live imaging coupled with lineage tracing, genome engineering, and artificial intelligence integration that collectively position GBM organoids at the forefront of precision neuro-oncology, reproducing TME, enabling dynamic mapping of tumor evolution, and accelerating patient-specific therapeutic discovery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

23 pages, 1730 KB  
Review
Mitochondrial Hijacking and MicroRNA Crosstalk: Cancer Stem Cell-Mediated Immune Evasion and Metabolic Plasticity in the Tumor Microenvironment
by Maziar Ashrafian Bonab, Shahrzad Salehi, Amirreza Aghababaie, Ali Amini, Hoda Alizadeh and Babak Behnam
Cancers 2026, 18(10), 1611; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18101611 - 15 May 2026
Viewed by 751
Abstract
The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a highly adaptive and heterogeneous niche in which cancer stem cells (CSCs) promote immune evasion, metastatic dissemination, and therapy resistance. Among the mechanisms that support this phenotype, mitochondrial hijacking has emerged as a central strategy through which CSCs [...] Read more.
The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a highly adaptive and heterogeneous niche in which cancer stem cells (CSCs) promote immune evasion, metastatic dissemination, and therapy resistance. Among the mechanisms that support this phenotype, mitochondrial hijacking has emerged as a central strategy through which CSCs reprogram immune and stromal cells to favor tumor progression. This review synthesizes current evidence on how CSCs exploit mitochondrial transfer, particularly via tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) and extracellular vesicles (EVs), to impair antitumor immunity and remodel the metastatic niche. CSCs display marked metabolic plasticity, shifting between glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in response to environmental stress. They exploit this adaptability by transferring mitochondria and mitochondrial components to recipient cells, including tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and cytotoxic T cells, thereby disrupting ATP production, increasing oxidative stress, and skewing immune polarization. This mitochondrial hijacking contributes to an immunosuppressive milieu, stabilizes HIF-1α, and enhances PD-L1 expression, ultimately weakening T-cell activity and reinforcing CSC survival. EVs add another layer of regulation by transporting bioactive cargo, including oncogenic microRNAs (miRNAs) and mitomiRs such as miR-21, miR-210, and miR-34a. These molecules modulate mitochondrial gene expression, reshape immune signaling, and reinforce CSC phenotypes through autocrine and paracrine loops. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomic approaches have further revealed metabolic heterogeneity within CSC–immune synapses, identifying “metabolic hotspots” associated with profound immune dysfunction. Therapeutic strategies targeting OXPHOS, EV biogenesis, and miRNA activity are therefore being explored. In parallel, mitochondria-associated proteins such as TSGA10 may also contribute to CSC-driven immunometabolism regulation and deserve further investigation. Targeting downstream heterogeneity is like cutting the branches of a weed. Targeting the upstream mechanisms of mitochondrial hijacking and miRNA crosstalk aims to destroy the root (CSC plasticity) that generates the heterogeneity and drives therapy resistance in the first place. This review highlights mitochondrial hijacking and miRNA-mediated reprogramming as central determinants of CSC-driven immune escape and proposes a framework for precision interventions targeting CSC–immune interactions in metastatic cancer. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 3583 KB  
Review
Microglia Reprogramming in Glioblastoma: Stem Cell-Derived Factors as Emerging Immunomodulators
by Zahra Amiri, Beatrice Federica Tremonti, Alessandro Corsaro, Alessandra Pattarozzi, Adriana Bajetto, Federica Barbieri, Stefano Thellung and Tullio Florio
Cells 2026, 15(9), 840; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15090840 - 4 May 2026
Viewed by 1077
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) remains one of the most challenging forms of cancer to treat, despite that extensive molecular profiling is now available. Indeed, intratumoral cellular heterogeneity, receptor redundancy, and adaptive resistance through compensatory signaling limit the impact of targeted therapies. Moreover, immunotherapies also underperform: [...] Read more.
Glioblastoma (GBM) remains one of the most challenging forms of cancer to treat, despite that extensive molecular profiling is now available. Indeed, intratumoral cellular heterogeneity, receptor redundancy, and adaptive resistance through compensatory signaling limit the impact of targeted therapies. Moreover, immunotherapies also underperform: checkpoint blockade and vaccine strategies did not obtain consistent benefits in a low mutational burden, poorly immunogenic tumor microenvironment (TME) dominated by immunosuppressive myeloid cells. In this article, we provide evidence that tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), a form of CNS resident microglia and infiltrating macrophage, derived from bone marrow, adopt a spatially and transcriptionally distinct, non-binary continuum, shaped by tumor-derived signals and niche constraints, allowing glioma cells to resist to immune and pharmaceutical therapeutics. Metabolic rewiring, including hypoxia-linked glycolytic pressure, lactate signaling, and lipid-associated programs, determine immunosuppressive outputs and restrict plasticity, while epigenetic imprinting (DNA methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin regulators) stabilizes these programs and limits access to inflammatory loci. We discuss how stem cell secretome, and extracellular vesicles (EVs) and their cargo may act as tunable autocrine/paracrine inputs that may bias microglial regulatory control. Finally, we highlight major translational confounders, including EV operational definitions, blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability and regional exposure, inconsistent dosing units, mixed myeloid compartments, and manufacturing dependent variability. Therefore, an exposure-aware framework that integrates product identity, delivery evidence, state-sensitive potency assays, and functional endpoints would be highly desirable. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 529 KB  
Review
Micro/Nanoplastics and Periodontitis: An Environmental Microbiology Perspective on Oral Retention and Systemic Risk
by Mark Cannon, John Peldyak and Paul Reynolds
Microorganisms 2026, 14(5), 1014; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14051014 - 30 Apr 2026
Viewed by 565
Abstract
Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) have now been detected in human blood, placenta, and arterial tissue, yet the oral cavity has received strikingly little mechanistic attention despite serving as a primary portal of environmental exposure and a local site of polymer generation from dental [...] Read more.
Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) have now been detected in human blood, placenta, and arterial tissue, yet the oral cavity has received strikingly little mechanistic attention despite serving as a primary portal of environmental exposure and a local site of polymer generation from dental and oral-care materials. This narrative review addresses that gap from an environmental microbiology perspective, synthesizing recent literature on periodontal disease, chronic low-grade inflammation, oral biofilms, dental materials, microbial–plastic interactions, and systemic chronic disease risk. Unlike prior reviews, we apply an explicit three-tier evidentiary framework (established, plausible, unproven) that distinguishes what is directly demonstrated from what is biologically plausible but unproven, and we situate the periodontal environment specifically as a particle-retention and inflammatory-amplification niche. The strongest direct oral evidence shows that human dental calculus harbors at least 26 microplastic types, dominated by polyamide (41.4%), polyethylene (32.7%), and polyurethane (7.0%). Polyethylene isolated from calculus induces cytotoxicity, apoptosis, impaired migration, NF-κB activation, and upregulation of IL-1β and IL-6 in human gingival fibroblasts. From a microbiological standpoint, oral organisms actively degrade methacrylate dental polymers, and the degradation products of these polymers reciprocally modulate oral bacterial virulence gene expression. Across experimental systems, MNPs activate oxidative stress, inflammasome signaling, macrophage polarization, and barrier dysfunction, pathways that overlap extensively with periodontal pathobiology. Adjacent environmental microbiology demonstrates that plastic-associated biofilms enhance extracellular polymeric substance production, quorum sensing, pathogen persistence, and antibiotic resistance gene transfer, supporting a plausible but not yet validated oral plastisphere within plaque and calculus. We argue that periodontitis should be reconceptualized as a chronically inflamed particle-processing interface that may increase local MNP retention, cellular reactivity, and systemic inflammatory spillover, with implications for cardiovascular, metabolic, and other chronic disease risk pathways. Current evidence does not yet prove that environmental MNP exposure causes human periodontitis, and that evidentiary boundary is maintained throughout. A priority research agenda is proposed, centered on contamination-controlled subgingival biomonitoring stratified by periodontal status, spatially resolved multi-species biofilm models, polymer source attribution, and longitudinal clinical studies linking oral plastic burden to inflammatory and systemic outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Diseases and Microbiome)
Show Figures

Figure 1

45 pages, 2479 KB  
Review
Neurotrophins and Galectin-3: Hidden Keys in Neuroinflammation—A Narrative Review
by Bojana Simovic Markovic, Irfan Corovic, Marina Mitrovic, Nemanja Jovicic, Dragica Selakovic, Miodrag Sreckovic and Gvozden Rosic
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(9), 3742; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27093742 - 23 Apr 2026
Viewed by 459
Abstract
Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is a multifunctional molecule that exerts pleiotropic effects in inflammatory responses and contributes to the pathogenesis of numerous immune-mediated diseases. Although Gal-3 has been known for more than five decades, it remains a lectin with intriguing and not yet fully elucidated [...] Read more.
Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is a multifunctional molecule that exerts pleiotropic effects in inflammatory responses and contributes to the pathogenesis of numerous immune-mediated diseases. Although Gal-3 has been known for more than five decades, it remains a lectin with intriguing and not yet fully elucidated properties. The existing body of evidence underscores the importance of Gal-3 in the regulation of homeostatic and inflammatory processes. Neurotrophins are traditionally recognized as key regulators of neuronal development, survival, and synaptic plasticity; nevertheless, accumulating evidence indicates that they also play important roles in immune regulation and neuroimmune communication. Importantly, neurotrophins are also produced by immune cells, including monocytes, macrophages, lymphocytes, and basophils, which express functional neurotrophin receptors including tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA), tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkB), and p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR). In this narrative review, we synthesize current evidence on neuroinflammation, neurotrophins, and Gal-3, with a particular focus on the molecular mechanisms involved in the crosstalk between neurotrophins and Gal-3 or immune cells. We further examine how this neuroimmune–neurotrophic crosstalk contributes to the pathogenesis of psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders, as well as other neurological conditions. Finally, we discuss the emerging therapeutic potential of targeting neurotrophins and Gal-3 as modulators of neuroinflammation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Galectins (Gals), 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 4153 KB  
Review
Trained Immunity in Neutrophils and Mononuclear Phagocytes: Mechanisms and Pathophysiological Functions
by Wanying Li, Jialei Wei, Liyuan Li and Wei Sun
Cells 2026, 15(9), 752; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15090752 - 23 Apr 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1057
Abstract
Trained immunity refers to the enduring functional reprogramming of innate immune cells after particular stimuli, driven by epigenetic and metabolic alterations that augment non-specific responses upon subsequent exposure. Neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages, as essential innate effectors, are crucial for the induction and control of [...] Read more.
Trained immunity refers to the enduring functional reprogramming of innate immune cells after particular stimuli, driven by epigenetic and metabolic alterations that augment non-specific responses upon subsequent exposure. Neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages, as essential innate effectors, are crucial for the induction and control of trained immunity, which is the primary emphasis of this review. Neutrophils, the predominant circulating leukocytes, were historically considered incapable of memory owing to their brief lifespan. Emerging evidence indicates that trained immunity functions at the bone marrow progenitor level, influencing granulopoiesis to produce neutrophils with lasting functional modifications. This research offers new insights into neutrophil functions in infection, cancer, and inflammation. Monocytes and macrophages, characterized by phenotypic plasticity and tissue residence, function as conventional models of trained immunity. They experience direct peripheral reprogramming or emerge as primed descendants of trained bone marrow precursors, performing pro-inflammatory or reparative roles in malignancies, infections, and ischemia lesions. This study comprehensively outlines the regulatory mechanisms of trained immunity in these cells, clarifies their functions in various clinical situations, and examines therapeutic applications. Comprehending these pathways is crucial for elucidating the cellular foundation of innate immunological memory, uncovering its multiple functions in disease, and guiding innovative therapeutics aimed at granulopoiesis and monocyte-macrophage polarization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cellular Immunology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

35 pages, 8466 KB  
Review
Beyond M1/M2: The Pivotal Role of Macrophage Metabolic Reprogramming in Chronic Bone Disease and Targeted Intervention
by Qiao Wan, Zeling Fang, Jiarong Shi, Yu Jiang, Hua Jin, Chuangwei Sui, Xupeng Liu, Fangyu An, Yanxia Zhang, Zhendong Chen, Fan Ding and Chunlu Yan
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(9), 3731; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27093731 - 22 Apr 2026
Viewed by 557
Abstract
The progression of chronic bone diseases is intricately linked to dysregulated macrophage polarisation. However, a comprehensive understanding of the complex interplay between macrophage polarisation and metabolic reprogramming in the context of bone disorders remains elusive. Thus, this review conducted a systematic search of [...] Read more.
The progression of chronic bone diseases is intricately linked to dysregulated macrophage polarisation. However, a comprehensive understanding of the complex interplay between macrophage polarisation and metabolic reprogramming in the context of bone disorders remains elusive. Thus, this review conducted a systematic search of major databases, including PubMed, using combinations of keywords such as “macrophage polarisation,” “immunometabolism,” “metabolic reprogramming,” and “chronic bone diseases” (including “osteoporosis,” “osteoarthritis,” and “periodontitis”). Inclusion criteria prioritised original research published within the last five years to capture recent advances. Diverging from previous reviews constrained by the classical M1/M2 dichotomy, this article aims to delineate the heterogeneity and functional plasticity of macrophages within the bone microenvironment, emphasising metabolic reprogramming as a central mechanism driving the dynamic behaviour of macrophages across various skeletal pathologies. Furthermore, this review highlights the pivotal roles of specific metabolites—such as succinate, itaconate, and citrate—within the osseous microenvironment, underscoring their influence on macrophage phenotypic transitions and the regulation of bone metabolic homeostasis. Finally, this article envisages innovative therapeutic strategies targeting the “metabolism–immunity axis,” encompassing the design of nano-delivery systems to modulate macrophage metabolism, the utilisation of engineered extracellular vesicles, the development of immunometabolism-modulating biomaterials, and the exploration of naturally occurring bioactive molecules. Based on these findings, the present work proposes the “metabolism–immunity–skeleton” axis as a theoretical framework, thereby establishing a robust foundation for the development of precision metabolic immunotherapy tailored to a spectrum of chronic bone diseases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 6620 KB  
Article
The M1 Paradox: Pro-Tumorigenic Effect of Macrophage Cytotoxicity in Prostate Cancer
by Olga V. Kovaleva, Vasiliy V. Sinyov, Madina A. Rashidova, Olga S. Malashenko, Polina A. Podlesnaya, Pavel B. Kopnin, Maria V. Vasileva, Alexander S. Balkin, Andrey Plotnikov and Alexei Gratchev
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(8), 3655; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27083655 - 20 Apr 2026
Viewed by 608
Abstract
Macrophages are highly plastic cells of the tumor microenvironment, and although classically activated M1 macrophages are generally regarded as anti-tumor effectors, their prolonged cytotoxic activity may also promote tumor adaptation. In this study, we investigated whether sustained exposure of prostate cancer cells to [...] Read more.
Macrophages are highly plastic cells of the tumor microenvironment, and although classically activated M1 macrophages are generally regarded as anti-tumor effectors, their prolonged cytotoxic activity may also promote tumor adaptation. In this study, we investigated whether sustained exposure of prostate cancer cells to cytotoxic M1-like macrophages results in the selection of tumor cell populations with enhanced malignant properties. Macrophage-resistant derivatives of the human prostate cancer cell lines PC3 and DU145 were generated by repeated co-culture with cytotoxic THP-1-derived macrophages and characterized in vitro and in vivo. Macrophage-selected tumor cells showed increased proliferative activity and enhanced clonogenic survival. In vivo, these cells formed larger xenograft tumors with more aggressive histopathological features. At the same time, their migratory activity was not significantly increased, although they displayed partial epithelial–mesenchymal transition-like changes, including increased vimentin expression without a marked loss of epithelial markers. Transcriptomic profiling revealed coordinated inflammatory and adaptive reprogramming, characterized by the enrichment of cytokine- and immune-response pathways together with the suppression of metabolic and differentiation-associated programs. These changes were accompanied by the selective activation of p38 MAPK signaling, while sensitivity to paclitaxel remained unchanged. Taken together, the results indicate that macrophage cytotoxicity may act as a selective pressure promoting the emergence of inflammation-adapted tumor cell variants with increased malignant potential, supporting re-evaluation of the role of M1-like macrophages in tumor progression. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 757 KB  
Review
Neuroimmune Amplification and Resolution of Chronic Pain: A Systematically Searched Narrative Review
by Keren Grinberg
Immuno 2026, 6(2), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/immuno6020028 - 17 Apr 2026
Viewed by 1035
Abstract
Chronic pain is increasingly understood as a neuroimmune disorder rather than a purely neuronal condition, in which immune mediators and immune-like signaling within the nervous system regulate nociceptive gain across peripheral tissues, dorsal root ganglia (DRG), spinal cord, and supraspinal networks. Seminal and [...] Read more.
Chronic pain is increasingly understood as a neuroimmune disorder rather than a purely neuronal condition, in which immune mediators and immune-like signaling within the nervous system regulate nociceptive gain across peripheral tissues, dorsal root ganglia (DRG), spinal cord, and supraspinal networks. Seminal and recent syntheses show that microglia, macrophages, cytokines/chemokines, and innate immune sensors can initiate and maintain maladaptive plasticity and central sensitization, helping explain the frequent clinical dissociation between structural pathology, systemic inflammatory markers, and pain severity. However, immune biology is bidirectional: alongside pronociceptive pathways, a growing literature describes active “pain-resolving” programs that terminate sensitization and restore homeostasis, including regulatory T cell (Treg)–IL-10 signaling and specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs). A structured search of PubMed/MEDLINE, supplemented by Europe PMC and PubMed Central, was performed, and citation chasing through broad scholarly indices was used to identify high-impact reviews, meta-analyses, and translational mechanistic studies. Systematic biomarker syntheses in low back pain, neck pain, and fibromyalgia indicate modest and heterogeneous systemic inflammatory signals, underscoring the need for mechanistic endotyping and stage-specific interventions. Based on this evidence, a clinically oriented framework is presented that distinguishes immune-driven pain amplification from impaired resolution and outlines practical implications for assessment, biomarker interpretation, and precision-oriented trial design. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop