Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (661)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = lumbar surgery

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 810 KB  
Article
Dural Sac Cross-Sectional Area Measurement as an Indicator of Cauda Equina Syndrome Risk in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation
by Weonmin Cho, Soo-Bin Lee, Young-Seo Park and Kyung-Yil Kang
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(10), 3906; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103906 - 19 May 2026
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare but severe complication of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of the dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCSA) in predicting CES in affected patients. Methods: In this retrospective [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare but severe complication of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of the dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCSA) in predicting CES in affected patients. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed 99 patients who underwent surgery for LDH, including cases with CES, between 2014 and 2023. The DSCSA was measured at the narrowest level of the dural sac using axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed on DSCSA and other candidate risk factors. Results: Among the patients with LDH, nine (9.1%) had CES. In multivariable logistic regression, DSCSA was associated with CES, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62–0.90, p = 0.011). Exploratory receiver operating characteristic analysis identified an optimal DSCSA cut-off of 31.16 mm2, yielding 100% sensitivity, 92.2% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.974 (95% CI: 0.944–1.000, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Smaller DSCSA was associated with CES in patients with LDH. Patients with a DSCSA of approximately 30 mm2 or less may require closer monitoring for the development of CES symptoms. Given the limited number of CES cases, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and validated in larger studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 896 KB  
Systematic Review
Radiation Exposure in Minimally Invasive Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
by Dong Hun Kim, Jung-Woo Hur and Jae Taek Hong
Medicina 2026, 62(5), 977; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62050977 (registering DOI) - 17 May 2026
Viewed by 106
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Minimally invasive cervical spine surgery (MIS-CSS) relies heavily on intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, raising concerns about radiation exposure to patients and surgical staff. Unlike lumbar MIS, cervical-specific radiation exposure has not been systematically reviewed, despite distinct anatomical considerations, including proximity [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Minimally invasive cervical spine surgery (MIS-CSS) relies heavily on intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, raising concerns about radiation exposure to patients and surgical staff. Unlike lumbar MIS, cervical-specific radiation exposure has not been systematically reviewed, despite distinct anatomical considerations, including proximity to the thyroid gland and lens of the eye. This review aims to quantify intraoperative radiation exposure during MIS cervical spine procedures and evaluate available dose-reduction strategies. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar in April 2026 following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies reporting original quantitative radiation data during minimally invasive cervical spine procedures in adult patients (≥10 patients) were included. Quality was assessed using the MINORS tool and the JBI checklist. Results: Seven studies encompassing 380 patients were included. Procedures comprised ACDF (four studies), minimally invasive posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy (two studies), and CT-navigated cervical instrumentation (one study). Patient effective doses during ACDF ranged from 0.015 to 1.3 mSv, with thyroid doses of 0.194–0.290 mGy. Standalone ACDF reduced patient dose by 36–58% compared to plated ACDF (p < 0.001). Navigation-assisted posterior cervical foraminotomy achieved a median fluoroscopy time of 10 s with negligible staff exposure. Surgeon per-procedure exposure during cervical discectomy (chest 0.122 µSv, lens 3.1 µSv, hands 7.1 µSv) was approximately half that of lumbar discectomy. Conclusions: Radiation doses during individual MIS cervical procedures appear to be within occupational safety limits, though the current evidence is insufficient to establish definitive dose thresholds. Standalone implant designs and intraoperative navigation represent effective, complementary dose-reduction strategies. Standardized prospective research is needed to establish cervical-specific radiation safety benchmarks. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2418 KB  
Article
Neurological Phenotype and MRI Severity as Predictors of Duloxetine Response in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
by Kazuya Honjoh, Arisa Kubota, Shuji Watanabe, Mikiko Kamitani, Yumiko Watanabe and Hideaki Nakajima
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(10), 3708; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103708 - 12 May 2026
Viewed by 231
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) is a major cause of neurological disability and is frequently accompanied by neuropathic pain (NeP). Duloxetine is widely used for NeP, but its clinical role in LSS and the determinants of treatment response remain unclear. This study [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) is a major cause of neurological disability and is frequently accompanied by neuropathic pain (NeP). Duloxetine is widely used for NeP, but its clinical role in LSS and the determinants of treatment response remain unclear. This study aimed to identify predictors of duloxetine efficacy in LSS. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 145 patients with LSS who received duloxetine for ≥3 months (median dose 40 mg) with at least 1-year follow-up. Patients were classified into those with radicular pain or cauda equina syndrome. Treatment response was assessed at 3 months. Stenosis severity was evaluated using the Schizas classification. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of duloxetine response in patients with cauda equina syndrome. Results: Duloxetine was effective in 29.4% vs. 52.3% in radicular pain and cauda equina syndrome, respectively. Among patients with cauda equina syndrome, Schizas Grade D was more frequent in responders than non-responders and independently predicted duloxetine response. Nearly 90% of responders had been unresponsive to other NeP medications. A subset of patients with severe stenosis avoided surgery following duloxetine treatment. Conclusions: Duloxetine showed greater efficacy in cauda equina-dominant LSS compared with radicular pain. Paradoxically, more severe spinal canal stenosis tended to be associated with a higher likelihood of response. These findings suggest that neurological phenotype and radiological severity may influence duloxetine responsiveness and support a symptom- and imaging-guided pharmacological management for LSS, although these findings should be interpreted with caution and considered hypothesis-generating given the retrospective study design. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Outcomes in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3340 KB  
Technical Note
Exoscopic Extraforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: Technical Considerations and Clinical Outcomes During the Early Learning Curve
by Kentaro Yamane, Shinichiro Takao, Kanji Sasaki, Wataru Narita, Hisakazu Shitozawa, Kazuhiro Takeuchi and Shinnosuke Nakahara
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(9), 3516; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093516 - 4 May 2026
Viewed by 273
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion provides indirect decompression without entering the spinal canal, but its uptake has been limited by poor visualization and risk of exiting nerve root injury. We describe a minimally invasive exoscopic extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (exELIF) technique and [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion provides indirect decompression without entering the spinal canal, but its uptake has been limited by poor visualization and risk of exiting nerve root injury. We describe a minimally invasive exoscopic extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (exELIF) technique and evaluate its clinical and radiological outcomes. This study aims to describe the exELIF technique and report its early clinical and radiological outcomes. Methods: Twenty-six patients with lumbar degenerative diseases underwent exELIF using a 3D exoscope (ORBEYE). The procedure was performed through bilateral 30–40 mm posterior incisions. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association score preoperatively and at 1-year follow-up. Postoperative computed tomography evaluated interbody fusion. Operative time, blood loss, and complications were recorded. Results: Mean operative time was 131 ± 51 min, and mean estimated blood loss was 82 ± 99 mL. The mean JOA score improved from 15.2 ± 2.2 to 24.3 ± 2.6, with a mean recovery rate of 66% at 1 year. Interbody fusion was achieved in 96%. In an exploratory CUSUM analysis of 18 single-level fluoroscopy-guided cases, a transition in operative time was observed at approximately the 10th case; operative time and estimated blood loss decreased from 141.5 ± 39.2 min and 89.0 ± 77.8 mL in cases 1–10 to 80.1 ± 6.7 min and 21.2 ± 18.1 mL in cases 11–18 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.035, respectively), indicating a reduction of operative time with accumulated experience rather than a formally established learning curve. Three patients developed transient exiting nerve root symptoms that resolved spontaneously during follow-up. One patient at the L5/S level required revision surgery due to left L5 nerve root palsy caused by posterior migration of the bone graft; this complication led to a modification of the technique, with posterior bone grafting no longer performed at L5/S. Partial screw loosening was observed in 5 patients (19%), all of which were asymptomatic and required no additional intervention. Conclusions: ExELIF provides excellent visualization in deep surgical fields, allowing the use of conventional surgical instruments through minimally invasive incisions. This is an early feasibility report of a single-institution retrospective case series with a heterogeneous cohort and no control group; the present data therefore do not establish superiority over conventional or endoscopic ELIF. Within these limits, exELIF was associated with acceptable early clinical improvement and a high interbody fusion rate, and progressive reduction in operative time with experience suggests that it may be a technically feasible minimally invasive option for selected patients with lumbar degenerative disease and for revision surgery after lumbar decompression. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Minimally Invasive Spinal Treatment: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 835 KB  
Article
Patient-Related Factors Associated with Mechanical Failure After Hemilaminectomy with Posterolateral Fusion: An Exploratory Retrospective Cohort Study
by Oğuzhan Çiçek, Burak Keklikçioğlu, Hakan Uslu, İsmail Akçay, Ziya Çay, Osman Çiloğlu, Fırat Seyfettinoğlu and Evren Karaali
Healthcare 2026, 14(9), 1199; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14091199 - 29 Apr 2026
Viewed by 204
Abstract
Background: Implant-related mechanical failure remains a clinically relevant concern following posterior decompression and fusion in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The relative contribution of host-related versus construct-related factors to failure risk requires further clarification. Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort [...] Read more.
Background: Implant-related mechanical failure remains a clinically relevant concern following posterior decompression and fusion in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The relative contribution of host-related versus construct-related factors to failure risk requires further clarification. Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included 118 patients aged ≥65 years who underwent single-level hemilaminectomy with posterolateral fusion (PLF) for isolated L4–5 central LSS, with a minimum follow-up of 48 months (mean 51.0 ± 2.0 months). All procedures were performed using a standardized posterior technique with uniform 6.5-mm titanium rods and 6.5-mm pedicle screws. Mechanical failure was defined as revision surgery due to radiographically and clinically confirmed hardware-related complications in the absence of infection. Exploratory univariable analyses were conducted to evaluate associations between baseline variables and mechanical failure. Clinical outcomes were assessed using validated patient-reported outcome measures. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain were recorded. Results: Overall revision rate was 13.6% (16/118), including 14 cases (11.9%) of implant-related mechanical failure and 2 cases (1.7%) of infection-related revision. Higher age (p = 0.005), higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.005), lower bone mineral density (BMD) (p < 0.001), active smoking (p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (DM) (p = 0.023) were significantly associated with mechanical failure. Functional outcomes (ODI, RMDQ, VAS) improved significantly at final follow-up (all p < 0.001). Conclusions: Mechanical failure following hemilaminectomy with PLF appears to be predominantly influenced by host-related factors rather than construct characteristics when a standardized surgical technique is applied. Bone quality and modifiable systemic risk factors may play a critical role in long-term construct durability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Care)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 19143 KB  
Article
Revealing the Dynamic Association Between Lymphatic Endothelial Cell Markers and Intervertebral Disk Degeneration
by Qiang Zhang, Maoqiang Lin, Shishun Yan, Fei Huang and Haiyu Zhou
Biomedicines 2026, 14(5), 993; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14050993 - 27 Apr 2026
Viewed by 491
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to analyze the dynamic changes in lymphatic endothelial cell (LEC) markers during the progression of intervertebral disk degeneration (IDD) and to investigate their association with the progression of IDD. Method: In this study, intervertebral disk (IVD) specimens were first [...] Read more.
Objective: This study aims to analyze the dynamic changes in lymphatic endothelial cell (LEC) markers during the progression of intervertebral disk degeneration (IDD) and to investigate their association with the progression of IDD. Method: In this study, intervertebral disk (IVD) specimens were first collected from patients who underwent open lumbar fusion surgery for spinal fractures (control group, n = 10) and lumbar disk herniation (IDD group, n = 10). Concurrently, a mouse IDD model was established, and IVD specimens were collected from mouse in the Sham group and the IDD group 1, 3, and 6 weeks after modeling (n = 5 per group at each time point). Pathological morphological changes in human and mouse IVD specimens were observed using Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) and Masson’s Trichrome staining. The degree of degeneration in the mouse IVD specimens was quantified using a histopathological scoring system. Subsequently, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and immunofluorescence (IF) staining were employed to examine LEC markers in IVD tissue, including lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (LYVE-1), podoplanin (PDPN), prospero homeobox protein 1 (PROX-1), and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (VEGFR-3), as well as matrix metabolism-related markers such as matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP-13) and collagen II (Col II). Finally, we performed Spearman’s rank correlation analysis between the histopathological scores of all mouse IVD specimens and the corresponding expression levels of LEC markers. Results: In human IVD tissue, expression levels of LYVE-1, PDPN, PROX-1, and VEGFR-3 were extremely low in the normal group. In contrast, expression of these markers was significantly upregulated in the IDD group. In the mouse IDD model, compared with the Sham group at the same time point, the IDD group exhibited higher histopathological scores in IVD tissue, accompanied by upregulation of LYVE-1, PDPN, PROX-1, and MMP-13, as well as downregulation of Col II. In-depth analysis revealed that these differences between the Sham and IDD groups were not static but exhibited a dynamic pattern of increasing magnitude over time. Concurrently, as the modeling period progressed, the histopathological scores of mouse IVD in the IDD group, as well as the expression levels of LYVE-1, PDPN, PROX-1, and MMP-13, showed a progressive upward trend, while Col II expression progressively decreased. In addition, Spearman’s rank correlation analysis revealed that the expression levels of LYVE-1, PDPN, and PROX-1 in mouse IVD tissue were all significantly positively correlated with histopathological scores. Conclusions: In the process of IDD, the dynamic upregulation of LEC markers is highly consistent with its severity in the time dimension. At the same time, there was also a significant positive correlation between the expression level of LEC markers and the severity of IDD. Taken together, these findings suggest that the dynamic upregulation of LEC markers may be potentially associated with the pathological progression of IDD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 745 KB  
Article
Mid- to Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Lumbar Microdiscectomy in Adolescent Patients: A Descriptive Study
by Lawrence Sanchez, Johanna Austeen Gjestland, Per-Henrik Randsborg and Ole Kristian Alhaug
Children 2026, 13(4), 578; https://doi.org/10.3390/children13040578 - 21 Apr 2026
Viewed by 477
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Adolescent lumbar disc herniation (ALDH) is rare. Evidence on long-term surgical outcomes remains limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate mid- and long-term clinical outcomes following lumbar microdiscectomy in adolescents with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods: A single-institution [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Adolescent lumbar disc herniation (ALDH) is rare. Evidence on long-term surgical outcomes remains limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate mid- and long-term clinical outcomes following lumbar microdiscectomy in adolescents with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods: A single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients under 19 years who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy over a ten-year period. Baseline clinical and radiological data were obtained from electronic patient records (EPR) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Patient-reported outcomes were collected at follow-up using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) as the primary outcome and Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for back and leg pain and Global Perceived Effect (GPE) as secondary outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize results. Results: Seventeen of 27 patients (63%) participated. Mean age at surgery was 16.9 years, and mean symptom duration prior to surgery was 11.3 months. All patients underwent disc-preserving microdiscectomy. At a mean follow-up of 67.7 months, mean ODI was 9.5, mean NRS back pain was 2.8, and mean NRS leg pain was 2.3. Fourteen patients (82%) reported being completely recovered or much improved. Conclusions: Lumbar microdiscectomy in adolescents with LDH showed acceptable mid- to long-term outcomes, low disability, and low pain levels at more than five years of follow-up. Clinical and imaging findings resembled those seen in adults, though symptom duration before surgery was prolonged. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Orthopedics & Sports Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 28243 KB  
Technical Note
Surgical Correction of Thoracolumbar Kyphosis in Achondroplasia: Complications, Pitfalls, and Reflections on the Pursuit of Maximal Realignment in View of Correction Leading to Functional Disability
by Justyna Walczak, Emilia Nowosławska, Krzysztof Zakrzewski and Paweł Grabala
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(8), 3142; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15083142 - 20 Apr 2026
Viewed by 362
Abstract
Background: Achondroplasia, the most common genetic dwarfism caused by the FGFR3 mutation (autosomal dominant, 80% de novo), results in a disproportionately short stature. Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), combined with characteristic spinal canal stenosis, increases the risk of symptomatic compression, yet the literature lacks clear [...] Read more.
Background: Achondroplasia, the most common genetic dwarfism caused by the FGFR3 mutation (autosomal dominant, 80% de novo), results in a disproportionately short stature. Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), combined with characteristic spinal canal stenosis, increases the risk of symptomatic compression, yet the literature lacks clear thresholds for symptom onset or progressive deformity angles. Methods: A 16-year-old female with achondroplasia presented with rapidly progressive kyphosis despite conservative management (bracing and therapy). Over six months, she developed neurogenic claudication; bilateral leg pain; weakness; and paresthesia that worsened with standing/walking, which was relieved by flexion/sitting. Imaging demonstrated surgical-threshold kyphosis with progressive spinal misalignment. Her symptoms indicated compressive myeloradiculopathy from lumbar stenosis, critical given achondroplasia’s congenitally narrowed canal and heightened neurologic vulnerability. Results: Staged surgery planned: Posterior fusion T6-L4 with pedicle screws and then extensive decompression (laminectomy/foraminotomy T11-L3), L1 corpectomy with expandable titanium cage, and Ponte osteotomies. Intraoperative complications included a malpositioned left T10 screw breaching the anterior/lateral cortex near the aorta, requiring urgent revision. Postoperatively: Neurogenic bladder, wound leakage, and E. coli urinary tract infection (UTI) with fever (treated with IV antibiotics). After infection resolution, definitive surgery removed the malpositioned screw and completed decompression, corpectomy, cage placement, bone grafting, and osteotomies, successfully resolving neurological symptoms. However, 13 cm trunk lengthening caused severe functional impairment—disproportionately short arms prevented independent toileting and dressing. Left arm lengthening via external fixation restored partial function. At 2.5-year follow-up, there was solid fusion, no neurological deficits, and improved quality of life. Conclusions: Surgery addresses severe TLK, vertebral wedging, and neurogenic claudication in achondroplasia. Vertebral column resection effectively corrects TLK and neurological deficits but carries a high complication risk. This should be reserved for severe TLK with hypoplastic vertebrae, performed by experienced surgeons. Critically, correction magnitude must preserve limb–trunk proportions to prevent functional disability, as excessive lengthening may necessitate additional limb procedures for independence restoration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 539 KB  
Article
Minimally Invasive Robotic-Assisted Complex Adult Spinal Deformity Correction in a Surgical Specialty Hospital: Bringing Adult Spinal Deformity Care Closer to Home
by Roland Kent
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(8), 2913; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15082913 - 11 Apr 2026
Viewed by 457
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction is a complex surgery to restore spinal alignment and relieve patients’ symptoms. Modern techniques and technologies allow for aggressive surgical correction in tissue-friendly ways that preserve anatomy and may enable faster recovery. Robotic-assisted posterior spinal stabilization [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction is a complex surgery to restore spinal alignment and relieve patients’ symptoms. Modern techniques and technologies allow for aggressive surgical correction in tissue-friendly ways that preserve anatomy and may enable faster recovery. Robotic-assisted posterior spinal stabilization may be used as an adjunct to complex ASD reconstruction to facilitate a minimally invasive approach, reduce perioperative morbidity and physiological insult, and allow for the performance of procedures traditionally reserved for large academic centers to be effectively performed by qualified surgeons in optimized patients at smaller hospitals with fewer resources. The objective of this study is to assess realignment, perioperative complications, and patient-reported outcomes of complex, minimally invasive, robotic-assisted adult spinal deformity correction in a surgical specialty hospital. Methods: Demographic, surgical, and perioperative data were collected from the medical record. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain scores were collected preoperatively and at regular post-op visits. X-rays were captured preoperatively before hospital discharge and at follow-up visits. Results: Fifty consecutive deformity patients were corrected with a two-stage approach (anterior column reconstruction followed by posterior stabilization with robotic-assisted screw placement on the next day) at a 48-bed (eight operating rooms), surgeon-owned, subspecialty hospital. The average patient age was 70 years, and 64% were female. The average estimated blood loss (EBL) values for the first and second stages were 62 mL and 205 mL, respectively. The average operative time was 172 min during the first stage and 210 min for the second stage. Three interbody spacers (first stage) and 16 screws (second stage) were inserted on average in each procedure. The average length of stay (LOS) in the hospital was 5 days, and the average follow-up period was 10.6 months. No patients required a transfer to another facility with intensive care unit (ICU) capabilities, and none required a revision of hardware placement. There was an average reduction in the lumbar coronal scoliotic curve of 14.5° and an increase in lumbar lordosis of 14.8° at the latest follow-up (p < 0.01). The average mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) preoperatively was 17.6°, which was reduced to 9.6° at the latest postoperative follow-up (p < 0.01). Mean ODI (%) and NRS scores were significantly improved by 33.8% (46.7 ± 13.3 to 30.9 ± 19.8; p < 0.01) and 55% (6.0 ± 2.2 to 2.7 ± 2.6; p < 0.01), respectively, at last follow-up. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of performing complex, robotic-assisted ASD corrective surgery in a surgical specialty hospital, achieving significant correction of sagittal and coronal deformities, relieving patients’ symptoms, and offering efficiency and consistency to pedicle screw placement. This study demonstrates that a minimally invasive approach to complex deformity reconstruction reduces perioperative morbidity with decreased operative times, EBL, and LOS when compared to historic controls. This approach allows for the democratization of deformity care in that procedures typically reserved for large academic centers can be successfully accomplished at smaller institutions in optimized patients by qualified surgeons with appropriate perioperative support staff. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Concepts in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1790 KB  
Review
Advancements, Challenges, and Innovations in Mechanical and Animal Testing of Lumbar Spine Implants
by Zachary Comella, Raydeep Kainth, Yosuf Arab, Elizabeth Beaulieu, Maohua Lin, Rudy Paul, Richard Sharp, Talha S. Cheema and Frank D. Vrionis
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(8), 3662; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16083662 - 9 Apr 2026
Viewed by 629
Abstract
Lumbar spine disorders often require surgical intervention using medical implants to stabilize or replace damaged structures. As the prevalence of these surgeries increases due to an aging population, rigorous preclinical evaluation is critical. This narrative review aims to summarize current testing methods, identify [...] Read more.
Lumbar spine disorders often require surgical intervention using medical implants to stabilize or replace damaged structures. As the prevalence of these surgeries increases due to an aging population, rigorous preclinical evaluation is critical. This narrative review aims to summarize current testing methods, identify gaps in clinical translatability, and explore the role of emerging computational technologies. Mechanical testing protocols established by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) provide essential standardized data on structural integrity but fail to replicate the complex biological interactions of the human spine. Similarly, animal models offer insights into biological responses like osseointegration but are limited by quadrupedal biomechanics and anatomical differences. Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) enable rapid, patient-specific modeling and high-throughput screening, significantly reducing the time and cost of physical testing. Future innovations include 3D-printed personalized implants, bio-responsive materials, and genetically modified animal models to bridge existing translatability gaps. In conclusion, improving the clinical success of lumbar spine implants requires an integrated framework that combines mechanical, biological, and computational approaches. This interdisciplinary collaboration is vital for developing safer and more effective treatments for patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Computing and Artificial Intelligence)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 1814 KB  
Article
Endplate Bone Quality Assessment for Preoperative Planning and Patient-Specific Implementation in Lumbar Spine Surgery
by Wesley P. Jameson, Bailey D. Lupo, Andrew M. Schwartz, Andrew Daigle, Ahmed Anwar, Smith Surendran, Huy Tran, Christian Quinones, Deepak Kumbhare, Bharat Guthikonda and Stanley Hoang
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(7), 2800; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15072800 - 7 Apr 2026
Viewed by 535
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Poor bone quality is strongly associated with adverse surgical events. Although dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains the gold standard for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment, logistical barriers may limit its preoperative application. The Endplate Bone Quality (EBQ) score is an MRI-derived [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Poor bone quality is strongly associated with adverse surgical events. Although dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains the gold standard for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment, logistical barriers may limit its preoperative application. The Endplate Bone Quality (EBQ) score is an MRI-derived metric quantifying subchondral bone quality at the vertebral endplate with demonstrated predictive value for cage subsidence following lumbar interbody fusion. However, EBQ has been measured exclusively at the operative level in surgical cohorts. This study aimed to assess level-specific EBQ scores across the entire lumbar spine and compare distributions across age, sex and osteoporosis subgroups. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review of T1-weighted lumbar MRI studies from patients evaluated for lower back pain from 2020 to 2025 was performed. EBQ was independently scored by two blinded raters at each disc space from L1–L2 to L5–S1 using 3 mm endplate ROIs normalized to a CSF ROI at L3. Interrater reliability was assessed via ICC, Pearson correlation, and RMSE. Patients were stratified by age (≤60 vs. >60 years), sex, and osteoporosis status, and subgroup comparisons were performed for overall and level-specific EBQ score. Results: A total of 96 patients with an average age of 61.0 ± 9.42 years were included in this study. The majority of patients included were female (87.5%), and 18.8% had been diagnosed with osteoporosis. EBQ scores demonstrated a progressive caudal increase across all subgroups from L2–L3 to L5–S1. Overall interrater reliability was acceptable (ICC = 0.76), with level-specific ICCs ranging from 0.70 to 0.83. No significant differences were observed between age or sex subgroups. Osteoporotic patients demonstrated significantly higher EBQ at L1–L2, L2–L3, and overall (all p < 0.05), with no significant differences at L3–L4 through L5–S1. Conclusions: This study provides normative, level-specific EBQ reference data throughout all levels of the lumbar spine. The increase in EBQ scores seen among caudal levels and reduced osteoporotic discriminatory power support the importance of level-specific context when interpreting EBQ thresholds. These findings may support future studies evaluating threshold development for EBQ. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advancements in Spine Surgery: Best Practices and Outcomes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 504 KB  
Article
The Influence of Lumbar and Lumbosacral Segmental Fusion as a Predictor of Sacroiliac Joint Pain
by Fouad Qupti, Mohammad Walid Al-Smadi, Árpád Viola, Kamal Haider, Jeries Hakim, Mokbil Shalah and Khaled Aslan
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(7), 2696; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15072696 - 2 Apr 2026
Viewed by 332
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the influence of lumbar and lumbo-sacral spinal fusion surgery on the incidence of postoperative sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 154 patients who underwent lumbar or lumbo-sacral spinal fusion between 2015 and 2019 at EMMS [...] Read more.
Objective: To evaluate the influence of lumbar and lumbo-sacral spinal fusion surgery on the incidence of postoperative sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 154 patients who underwent lumbar or lumbo-sacral spinal fusion between 2015 and 2019 at EMMS Nazareth Hospital, Israel. Clinical data, surgical details, and demographic factors were collected. Postoperative SIJ pain was diagnosed primarily through the FABER test and confirmed by selective injections and imaging when clinically indicated. Statistical analyses included Chi-square and Student’s t-tests. Results: Postoperative SIJ pain was observed in 28.5% of patients. The incidence significantly correlated with the number of fused segments (p = 0.048) and the involvement of sacral segments (36.1% with sacral involvement vs. 16.7% without; p = 0.009). Demographic factors (age, gender, ethnicity) were not significant predictors. Conclusions: Lumbar and lumbo-sacral spinal fusions substantially increase the risk of postoperative SIJ pain, particularly with multi-segment and sacral-involved surgeries. Careful preoperative surgical planning is essential to minimize SIJ-related complications and improve patient outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1902 KB  
Article
Beyond Histology: Tensiomyography as an Integrated Measure of Muscle Function in Osteoporotic and Osteoarthritic Patients
by Chiara Greggi, Caterina Scaminaci, Manuela Montanaro, Pierpaolo Talarico, Antonio Matticari, Marco Albanese, Jure Jemec, Sergej Rozman, Alessandro Mauriello, Riccardo Iundusi, Elena Gasbarra and Umberto Tarantino
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(7), 2583; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15072583 - 27 Mar 2026
Viewed by 1039
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Osteoporosis and osteoarthritis are age-related musculoskeletal disorders with a high socio-health burden, affecting both healthcare systems and individuals’ quality of life. Both conditions are generally accompanied by a concomitant decline in muscle mass and strength, referred to as sarcopenia. In this context, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Osteoporosis and osteoarthritis are age-related musculoskeletal disorders with a high socio-health burden, affecting both healthcare systems and individuals’ quality of life. Both conditions are generally accompanied by a concomitant decline in muscle mass and strength, referred to as sarcopenia. In this context, tensiomyography emerges as a novel, non-invasive potential diagnostic strategy for assessing muscle quality, as this parameter influences the progression of both conditions. Methods: Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyses were performed on vastus lateralis muscle tissue obtained from patients undergoing surgery for femoral fracture affected by osteoporosis or osteopenia, patients operated for hip osteoarthritis, and patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, concomitantly affected by osteoporosis or osteopenia. In addition, muscle function was assessed in these patients using tensiomyographic analysis. Results: In osteoarthritic, osteoporotic, and osteopenic patients, a reduction in muscle quality and function was observed compared with the other two experimental groups, indicating an unfavorable effect of the coexistence of the two conditions on the muscular component. Furthermore, contraction time (Tc) measured by tensiomyography was negatively correlated with lumbar spine bone mineral density values and positively correlated with the percentage of type II muscle fibers. Conclusions: This study highlights how tensiomyography may represent a valuable non-invasive diagnostic strategy for assessing muscle status in osteoporotic and osteoarthritic patients, as it is able to detect muscle alterations that parallel the worsening of bone status and that cannot be inferred from simple biopsy analysis. Thus, tensiomyography could be considered a practical adjunct tool in the clinical assessment of musculoskeletal frailty. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 887 KB  
Review
A Review of Finite Element Analysis in Spine Surgery Decision-Making
by Elizabeth Beaulieu, Jaden Wise, Isabella Merem, Zachary Comella, Rosstin Afsahi, Joshua Roemer, Maohua Lin, Richard Sharp, Talha S. Cheema and Frank D. Vrionis
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(7), 2584; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15072584 - 27 Mar 2026
Viewed by 889
Abstract
Finite element analysis is widely used to study spinal biomechanics and to compare surgical strategies under controlled loading conditions. By allowing variation in alignment, fixation, and implant design, these models provide insight into stress redistribution and motion changes that are difficult to isolate [...] Read more.
Finite element analysis is widely used to study spinal biomechanics and to compare surgical strategies under controlled loading conditions. By allowing variation in alignment, fixation, and implant design, these models provide insight into stress redistribution and motion changes that are difficult to isolate experimentally. This review examines spine surgery-focused finite element studies published between 2018 and 2024, with emphasis on interbody fusion techniques, adjacent segment mechanics, and implant-related stress behavior. Across lumbar fusion models, constructs incorporating anterior column support demonstrate lower posterior instrumentation stress than posterior-only approaches, with lateral lumbar interbody techniques showing reduced rod and screw stresses across multiple loading conditions compared with posterior lumbar interbody or posterolateral fusion constructs. In the cervical spine, comparisons of plated and zero-profile anterior cervical discectomy and fusion devices show smaller increases in adjacent-level motion and intradiscal pressure with zero-profile constructs, alongside higher localized stress at fixation interfaces. More recent studies apply finite element methods to implant optimization, alignment planning, and patient-specific modeling. Together, these findings suggest that finite element analysis is increasingly used to support surgical planning and implant design, with continued advances in validation and patient-specific simulation likely to strengthen its clinical relevance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

20 pages, 2909 KB  
Article
Combining Engineering Precision with Clinical Relevance: A Novel Dual Framework for Assessing Pedicle Screw Accuracy in Spine Surgery
by Arnaud Delafontaine, Olivier Cartiaux, Bernard G. Francq and Virginie Cordemans
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(6), 2328; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15062328 - 18 Mar 2026
Viewed by 360
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Accurate pedicle screw placement is critical in spine surgery, as malposition can cause neurological, vascular, or visceral injuries and compromise construct stability. The primary objective of this study was to develop and experimentally validate a dual quantitative framework for assessing pedicle screw [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Accurate pedicle screw placement is critical in spine surgery, as malposition can cause neurological, vascular, or visceral injuries and compromise construct stability. The primary objective of this study was to develop and experimentally validate a dual quantitative framework for assessing pedicle screw placement accuracy, combining (1) coaxiality, a standardized geometric metric of trajectory alignment, and (2) pedicle wall distance (dpw), a novel parameter defined as the minimal distance between the screw axis and the pedicle cortex providing surgeons with direct, millimetric, clinically actionable feedback. A secondary objective was to compare these parameters: dpw, coaxiality, entry point errors and orientation angle errors between senior surgeons and residents to evaluate the influence of surgical experience. We hypothesized that this framework would provide reproducible quantitative measurements, demonstrate strong agreement with established CBCT-based grading systems, and allow meaningful subgroup comparisons by experience level. Methods: Eight operators (four senior surgeons, four residents) performed 240 pedicle screw insertions on synthetic polyurethane lumbar spine models using freehand, CBCT-assisted, and navigation-assisted techniques. Predefined 3D trajectories were compared with actual screw positions digitized with sub-millimetric precision. Errors, coaxiality, and dpw were computed, and dpw was validated against CBCT-based Gertzbein and Heary classifications. Agreement and diagnostic performance metrics (Kappa, sensitivity, specificity) were calculated. Results: Of 236 analyzable screws, coaxiality correlated with entry point errors (ρ = 0.41), target point errors (ρ = 0.85), and orientation angle errors (ρ = 0.48), confirming its robustness as an engineering metric. dpw provided immediate, interpretable feedback and demonstrated near-perfect agreement with CBCT grading (Kappa = 0.86; sensitivity = 0.96; specificity = 0.97), detecting breaches missed by qualitative classifications. Subgroup analyses indicated small but significant differences between senior and junior surgeons for target point errors (p = 0.006), orientation angle errors (p = 0.025), and coaxiality (p = 0.023), whereas entry point errors (p = 0.201) and dpw (p = 0.163) did not differ significantly. Conclusions: This dual-metric framework bridges engineering rigor and intraoperative applicability. Coaxiality supports reproducible research assessment, while dpw enables actionable surgical feedback. The framework allows objective comparison across operators of different experience levels. Together, these metrics offer a standardized, clinically relevant, and quantitative method for evaluating pedicle screw placement, with potential to enhance surgical safety, education, and patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Spine Surgery: Current Innovations and Future Directions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop