Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (85)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = low-level laser therapy (LLLT)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 4472 KiB  
Article
Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Periodontal Host Cells and a Seven-Species Periodontitis Model Biofilm
by Selma Dervisbegovic, Susanne Bloch, Vera Maierhofer, Christian Behm, Xiaohui Rausch-Fan, Andreas Moritz, Christina Schäffer and Oleh Andrukhov
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(14), 6803; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146803 - 16 Jul 2025
Viewed by 328
Abstract
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is gaining attention as an effective adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment. This study evaluates the potential of LLLT to reduce bacterial load in a clinically relevant in vitro subgingival biofilm model and its impact on the inflammatory response. A [...] Read more.
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is gaining attention as an effective adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment. This study evaluates the potential of LLLT to reduce bacterial load in a clinically relevant in vitro subgingival biofilm model and its impact on the inflammatory response. A subgingival biofilm model consisting of seven bacterial species was established. Primary human gingival fibroblasts (GFs) and periodontal ligament cells (PDLs) were cultured. Both biofilms and host cells were treated with the DenLase Diode Laser (980 nm) under various clinically relevant settings. The composition and structure of the seven-species biofilms were evaluated using quantitative PCR and fluorescence microscopy, respectively. The inflammatory response in host cells was analyzed by measuring the gene and protein expression levels of various inflammatory mediators. Laser treatment at power outputs ranging from 0.3 to 2 W had no significant effect on biofilm composition or architecture. LLLT, particularly at higher power settings, reduced the viability in both GFs and PDLs up to 70%. Gene expression levels of inflammatory mediators were only minimally influenced by laser treatment. However, LLLT significantly decreased the secretion of all examined cytokines. These findings suggest that LLLT with a 980 nm diode laser, under clinically relevant conditions, exerts anti-inflammatory rather than antimicrobial effects. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 565 KiB  
Article
Efficacy of Manual Therapy and Electrophysical Modalities for Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Interventional Trial
by Michał Wieczorek and Tomasz Wolny
Life 2025, 15(7), 1059; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15071059 - 2 Jul 2025
Viewed by 515
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of manual therapy based on neurodynamic techniques and electrophysical modalities in the conservative treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). A total of 128 upper limbs affected by CuTS were initially enrolled in this [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of manual therapy based on neurodynamic techniques and electrophysical modalities in the conservative treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). A total of 128 upper limbs affected by CuTS were initially enrolled in this study, with 82 completing the full treatment protocol. The participants were divided into the following two intervention arms: the first arm (MT) (42 arms) received therapy based on sliding and tensioning neurodynamic techniques, while the second arm (EM) (40 arms) underwent physiotherapy based on electrophysical modalities, specifically low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and ultrasound therapy (US). Chi2 and Student’s t-test were used to compare the intervention arms, and no statistically significant differences were found. The evaluated outcomes included nerve conduction testing, ultrasound assessments (measuring cross-sectional area and shear modulus), pain levels, two-point discrimination, thresholds for cutaneous sensory perception, symptom severity, functional ability in specific tasks, and overall post-treatment improvement. Baseline comparisons indicated no statistically significant differences in any measured variables between the intervention groups (p > 0.05). Following treatment, each group exhibited significant improvements in their respective parameters (p < 0.01). Comparisons between groups post-intervention revealed statistically significant differences in nerve conduction results, ultrasound measurements (cross-sectional area and shear modulus), two-point discrimination, and sensory perception thresholds. These parameters improved more in the MT intervention arm. The use of neurodynamic techniques, ultrasound, and low-level laser therapy in the conservative treatment of mild to moderate forms of CuTS has a beneficial therapeutic effect. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physical Rehabilitation for Musculoskeletal Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1407 KiB  
Systematic Review
Low-Level Laser Therapy in the Management of Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw
by Vincenzo Bitonti, Rocco Franco, Lorenzo Cigni, Domenico Familiari, Gioele Gravili, Giuseppe Vazzana and Pietro di Michele
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4441; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134441 - 23 Jun 2025
Viewed by 558
Abstract
Background: Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (BRONJ) is a severe complication associated with bisphosphonate therapy, commonly used in the treatment of osteoporosis and metastatic bone diseases. Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) has been proposed as a potential treatment modality for BRONJ, with its [...] Read more.
Background: Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (BRONJ) is a severe complication associated with bisphosphonate therapy, commonly used in the treatment of osteoporosis and metastatic bone diseases. Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) has been proposed as a potential treatment modality for BRONJ, with its anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and regenerative effects being of particular interest. This systematic review aims to critically assess the current evidence regarding the efficacy of LLLT in the management of BRONJ. Methods: This review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, was performed to identify relevant studies published up to September 2024. The systematic review protocol has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the number 423003. All studies considered are observational. Studies were included if they investigated the application of LLLT in BRONJ treatment, reporting clinical outcomes such as pain reduction, lesion healing, and quality of life. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and the data were synthesized descriptively. Results: A total of four studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings indicate that LLLT, particularly when used in conjunction with surgical debridement and pharmacological therapy, significantly may reduce pain and promote soft tissue healing in patients with BRONJ. However, the heterogeneity of study designs, laser parameters, and outcome measures limits the generalizability of these results. Furthermore, most studies were small-scale, with moderate to high risk of bias. Conclusions: The current evidence suggests that LLLT may be a beneficial adjunctive therapy in the treatment of BRONJ. However, conclusions are limited by the lack of randomized controlled trials and methodological heterogeneity, particularly for pain management and soft tissue regeneration. However, further high-quality randomized controlled trials with standardized laser protocols are necessary to establish its efficacy and optimize clinical application. Therefore, one of the limitations of this literature review with meta-analysis is that only four studies were considered and, moreover, they were observational. The results of the meta-analysis showed that there is not enough evidence to declare a statistical correlation; this result will surely be due to the small number of studies and heterogeneity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 383 KiB  
Article
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy and Therapeutic Ultrasound in Patients with Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
by Şeyma Diyarbakır, Münevver Serdaroğlu Beyazal, Gül Devrimsel, Murat Yıldırım and Mehmet Serhat Topaloğlu
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4197; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124197 - 12 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1375
Abstract
Objectives: The aims of the presented study were to investigate and compare the effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) and therapeutic ultrasound (US) on pain, function, emotional status, and sleep disturbances in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT). Method: A total of 84 [...] Read more.
Objectives: The aims of the presented study were to investigate and compare the effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) and therapeutic ultrasound (US) on pain, function, emotional status, and sleep disturbances in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT). Method: A total of 84 patients with RCT were included in the study and randomly divided into the US group (n = 42) and the LLLT group (n = 42). Hot-pack, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and a home-based exercise program were also administered to patients in each group. The patients were evaluated at baseline, and at 1st, 4th, and 12th weeks after treatment by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Constant Murley Score (CMS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH), Hand Grip Strength (HGS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Results: Significant improvements in VAS, SPADI, CMS, DASH, BDI, BAI, PSQI, and SF-36 scores were observed over time in both groups (p < 0.05 for all). The improvements in HGS scores were significantly greater in the US group compared to the LLLT group (p < 0.05 for all). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in VAS, SPADI, CMS, DASH, BDI, BAI, PSQI, and SF-36 scores at each time point (p > 0.05 for all). Conclusions: Both therapeutic US and LLLT are effective and safe in the treatment of patients with RCT. However, our findings indicate no superiority of one treatment over the other in terms of pain relief or improvements in function, emotional status, sleep disturbances, or quality of life. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1249 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy to Reduce Pain Caused by Orthodontic Separators: A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled, Split-Mouth Study
by Alireza Khandan Dezfully, Márió Gajdács, Aliz Eperke Pató, Krisztina Kárpáti and Melinda Madléna
Dent. J. 2025, 13(5), 181; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13050181 - 22 Apr 2025
Viewed by 769
Abstract
Background: During the initiation of routine orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances, placing elastic separators (ESs) may lead to the patient experiencing considerable pain. Earlier studies evaluating the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on reducing pain caused by orthodontic ESs have reported contradictory [...] Read more.
Background: During the initiation of routine orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances, placing elastic separators (ESs) may lead to the patient experiencing considerable pain. Earlier studies evaluating the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on reducing pain caused by orthodontic ESs have reported contradictory results. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of a single application of LLLT on the experience of pain following ES placement. Methods: A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial was performed—with implementation of the split-mouth technique—where n = 33 volunteers (12 male and 21 female; aged between 19 and 36 years) were enrolled. ESs were placed at the mesial and distal surfaces of the first permanent molars in the upper or lower jaws. Jaws were divided into two quadrants; the treatment group received LLLT (using a GaAlAs diode laser, at a 980 nm wavelength, with 100 mW producing 6 J of energy; continuous wave), while the other quadrant served as the placebo side receiving a similar treatment, but without laser irradiation, immediately after separation. A questionnaire with a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0–100) was used for the assessment of pain (spontaneous pain and pain on mastication) scored for each first permanent molar directly after separation and after 6, 24, 48 and 72 h of both laser and placebo treatment application. Results: Mean VAS values were lower, but not significantly different, between the treatment vs. placebo groups for spontaneous pain at either measurement point (p > 0.05). Mean VAS values were significantly lower in the treatment groups for pain on mastication at the 6 (9.29 ± 12.65 vs. 19.07 ± 20.99; p = 0.025), 24 (21.96 ± 21.11 vs. 37.19 ± 26.35; p = 0.012) and 48 h (28.01 ± 21.40 vs. 42.60 ± 26.29; p = 0.016) measurement points. The analgetic effect of LLLT was most effective after 6 h, both in the resting position (−49% decrease) and during mastication (−51% decrease). Conclusions: A single application of LLLT with 6 J of energy may have beneficial effects on reducing the pain caused by orthodontic ESs used at the initiation of treatment with fixed appliances, especially during mastication, after 6–48 h following the separation procedure. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT06816537 (date of registration: 7 February 2025, retrospectively registered). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2842 KiB  
Article
Synergistic Effect of Polydeoxyribonucleotides with Low-Level Lasers on the Regeneration of Crush-Injured Facial Nerves
by Kyung Hoon Sun, Cheol Hee Choi and Chul Ho Jang
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(5), 1678; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051678 - 1 Mar 2025
Viewed by 859
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The regeneration of the facial nerve using low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been infrequently reported. Polydeoxyribonucleotides (PDRNs), a blend of short deoxyribonucleotide polymers known for their non-toxic and non-allergic properties, are recognized as a stimulator of cell growth that enhances cell [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The regeneration of the facial nerve using low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been infrequently reported. Polydeoxyribonucleotides (PDRNs), a blend of short deoxyribonucleotide polymers known for their non-toxic and non-allergic properties, are recognized as a stimulator of cell growth that enhances cell proliferation and supports wound healing. This study investigates the synergistic effect of the topical sustained release of PDRN/F-127 and LLLT on facial nerve regeneration following crush injury-induced paralysis in rats. Methods: The main trunk of the facial nerve was compressed for 1 min using a hemostat. Animals were divided into five groups: a control group (n = 4), group I (Pluronic F-127 only, n = 4), group II (Pluronic F-127/PDRN, n = 4), group III (Pluronic F-127 + LLLT, n = 4), and group IV (Pluronic F-127/PDRN + LLLT, n = 4). We measured the recovery of vibrissa fibrillation, action potential, and facial nerve blood flow (FNBF). Results: Group IV exhibited a comparatively faster development of vibrissa fibrillation over time than the other groups. After the intervention, significant differences in vibrissa fibrillation values were observed at all time points (p = 0.0028) according to the repeated one-way ANOVA. Regarding the threshold of action potential, all five groups revealed a significant difference (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.0001; multiple comparisons via Tukey’s test). Among the groups, group IV showed a significantly reduced threshold of action potential compared to the other groups. Group IV showed the most notable recovery in FNBF compared to the other groups. One-way ANOVA showed a significant difference (p < 0.0001; multiple comparisons by Dunnett’s test). Conclusions: These findings suggest that PDRN and LLLT may work together synergistically to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration. Future studies should investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms and evaluate the potential clinical applications of this combined treatment strategy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 565 KiB  
Review
Laser Application for Periodontal Surgical Therapy: A Literature Review
by Stefanos Zisis, Vasileios Zisis and Andreas Braun
Oral 2025, 5(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/oral5010011 - 8 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2023
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this article is to examine the effectiveness and capabilities of laser use in periodontal surgical therapy by analyzing the existing literature that focuses on laser use alone or as a supplement to the already existing periodontal surgical techniques, comparing [...] Read more.
Objectives: The aim of this article is to examine the effectiveness and capabilities of laser use in periodontal surgical therapy by analyzing the existing literature that focuses on laser use alone or as a supplement to the already existing periodontal surgical techniques, comparing it to conventional periodontal surgical therapy, with the intent to reach a better understanding of the efficiency and therapeutic potential of lasers in periodontal surgery. Methods: An electronic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed between October 2023 and December 2023 to identify all of the articles published in the last 15 years and investigate information about the application of Diode, Erbium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet (Er:YAG), Carbon Dioxide (CO2), and Neodymium yttrium–aluminum–garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers to surgical periodontal therapy in human trials. Results: The database search yielded 18 studies. All of the databases showed a clinical improvement in pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), and bleeding on probing (BOP) in both the test and control groups, with results from five articles showing statistically better PD reduction in the laser group compared to the control group. CAL gain was statistically higher in the laser group in six articles, while one study indicated better PD and CAL results in the control group. Improved GR reduction with a laser was noted in two articles, while one article reported a negative influence from a laser in GR. BOP was significantly better with laser in one study, while the remaining two studies reported the same results as the control group. Conclusions: Laser application in resective surgery exhibits additional benefits to the already established techniques, while in regenerative surgery, more investigation is needed. Diode laser use in periodontal surgery is already widespread and shows clinical efficacy, while low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has an exceptional potential for a variety of applications, promoting better wound healing and less post-surgical complications. However, more trials and studies are needed to further examine the maximum efficiency of each laser type in periodontal surgical therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lasers in Oral Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 5013 KiB  
Article
In Vitro Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on the Viability and Secretory Activity of Resting Macrophages
by Aleksandra Matuła, Amelia Lizak, Ewa Stodolak-Zych, Aneta Bac, Joanna Homa, Beata Stenka and Anna Ścisłowska-Czarnecka
Biomedicines 2025, 13(2), 403; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13020403 - 7 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1259
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) covers a wide range of parameters in terms of laser properties and dosage, which is important for its effects. It is important to select safe, optimal irradiation conditions to obtain the desired therapeutic effect of LLLT on [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) covers a wide range of parameters in terms of laser properties and dosage, which is important for its effects. It is important to select safe, optimal irradiation conditions to obtain the desired therapeutic effect of LLLT on cells. This article is focused on the selection of favourable (biostimulating) exposure conditions for LLLT, which are the beam application method (continuous [C] or pulsed [P] laser beam), radiation power and LLLT dose, on the viability and secretory activity regarding resting macrophages of the RAW 264.7 cell line. Methods: RAW 264.7 macrophages were seeded on 24-well tissue culture. ASTAR PhysioGo 400C apparatus with a spot applicator generating electromagnetic radiation in the infrared light range of 808 nm and power of 100 mW and 200 mW was used for laser irradiation of macrophages. Cells were treated with different doses of constant radiation 5 J/cm2/well or 10 J/cm2/well. Results: It was shown that the most beneficial radiation parameters for cells were obtained with a pulsed laser beam of 200 mW power and a dose of 5 J/cm2, which caused an increase in macrophage adhesion and viability, as well as an increase in NO secretion by macrophages and their TOS, with a simultaneous decrease in the secretion of TNF-α, MCP-1 and MMP-9 by cells. Conclusions: The research results presented above indicate that the effect of LLLT on resting macrophages modulates their biological activity, and the intensity of photobiostimulation depends on the irradiation parameters, including wavelength, power, dose and method of laser beam application. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wound Healing: From Basic to Clinical Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 978 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Short-Term Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, Low-Level Laser Therapy and Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Study
by Tugce Pasin and Bilinc Dogruoz Karatekin
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(2), 594; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14020594 - 17 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2834
Abstract
Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent form of osteoarthritis and a leading cause of chronic pain in adults. This study aimed to compare the short-term effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), low-level laser therapy (LLLT), and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy [...] Read more.
Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent form of osteoarthritis and a leading cause of chronic pain in adults. This study aimed to compare the short-term effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), low-level laser therapy (LLLT), and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) on pain, function, and quality of life in patients with knee OA. Methods: A hundred and twenty patients with Kellgren–Lawrence grade 2–3 knee OA were randomized into four groups: ESWT (once a week for three sessions), LLLT (twice a week for eight sessions), PEMF (twice a week for eight sessions), and a control group with 30 patients in each group. All participants were instructed in a daily exercise program, including knee joint range of motion, stretching, and strengthening exercises (3 × 10 repetitions). Outcome measures, including the visual analog scale (VAS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, were assessed at baseline after treatment and at the third month. Results: There were no significant differences between groups at baseline regarding VAS, WOMAC, SF-36, and TUG scores (p > 0.05). Significant improvements were observed in all parameters post-treatment for all groups (p < 0.001). However, the improvements in the PEMF group were significantly lower than in the ESWT and LLLT groups, particularly for VAS, WOMAC pain, and SF-36 physical function scores (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between ESWT and LLLT (p > 0.05). Conclusions: In the short-term, ESWT, LLLT, and PEMF effectively reduce pain, improve physical function, and enhance quality of life in patients with knee OA, though PEMF showed less pronounced improvements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic New Advances in Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1047 KiB  
Systematic Review
Photobiomodulation Therapy for Neurosensory Disturbances in Orthognathic Surgery Patients: A Systematic Review
by Aneta Olszewska, Mateusz Wolny, Julia Kensy, Agnieszka Kotela, Agata Czajka-Jakubowska and Jacek Matys
Life 2025, 15(1), 111; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15010111 - 16 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1833
Abstract
Background: Sensory disturbances and acquired paresthesia constitute a significant proportion of complications following orthognathic surgery. This systematic review examines the application of photobiomodulation (PBM) in managing these complications and its efficacy in promoting sensory recovery. Methods: In November 2024, a comprehensive digital search [...] Read more.
Background: Sensory disturbances and acquired paresthesia constitute a significant proportion of complications following orthognathic surgery. This systematic review examines the application of photobiomodulation (PBM) in managing these complications and its efficacy in promoting sensory recovery. Methods: In November 2024, a comprehensive digital search was performed across reputable databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, using carefully selected search terms: “orthognathic surgery” AND (physiotherapy OR physical therapy OR laser OR LLLT OR PBM OR light OR LED OR acupuncture) AND (nerve OR neurosensory OR paresthesia). The search adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Of the 424 articles initially identified, 14 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Results: The review focused on diode laser therapy for treating inferior alveolar nerve injuries, with most studies targeting this nerve and exploring diverse wavelengths, protocols, and surgical contexts, including orthognathic surgeries. Significant improvements were observed in tactile sensitivity, pain perception, and mechanical responsiveness. Factors such as earlier initiation of therapy, younger patient age, and higher treatment frequency were associated with improved outcomes. Conclusions: Low-level laser therapy emerges as a safe and effective intervention for enhancing neurosensory recovery following orthognathic surgery. However, the development of standardized treatment protocols and the conduct of larger-scale clinical trials are essential to optimize their clinical application. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 3020 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of the Low-Level Laser Therapy in Pain, Bite Force, and Mouth Opening Following Midfacial Trauma
by Mateus Diego Pavelski, Maicon Douglas Pavelski, Luana Ferreira Oliveira, Helio Doyle Pereira da Silva, Lucio Frigo and Osvaldo Magro-Filho
Life 2024, 14(12), 1626; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14121626 - 9 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1618
Abstract
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is known for its biostimulant properties, which can reduce inflammation and promote tissue regeneration. The present study is randomized, blinded, and placebo-controlled and aims to investigate the role of LLLT in the postoperative recovery of facial fractures. Patients with [...] Read more.
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is known for its biostimulant properties, which can reduce inflammation and promote tissue regeneration. The present study is randomized, blinded, and placebo-controlled and aims to investigate the role of LLLT in the postoperative recovery of facial fractures. Patients with fractures of the zygomatic bone are selected and divided into two groups: low-level laser and red placebo light. The patients are evaluated for bite force, pain, mouth opening, and paresthesia in the pre-operatory day, on days 1, 2, 7, and 14. The trismus data demonstrated better results in the laser with a significant difference in the periods 7 and 14 days, with p-values of 0.0442 and 0.026, respectively. Regarding the bite force analyzed, no statistically significant differences were observed. In the pain scale comparison, there was a difference between the PLACEBO group and the LASER group for day 1 (p = 0.011), day 2 (p = 0.001), 7 (p = 0.001), and 14 days (p = 0.010). In the evaluation of paresthesia, on days 7 and 14, there were better results in the LASER group with p = 0.012 and p = 0.001. The laser acted as a moderator of the healing process, having a considerable effect on the aspects of trismus, pain, postoperative paresthesia, and bite force. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 480 KiB  
Review
The Impact of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Spasticity in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review
by Amalio Jiménez, Frederick R. Carrick, Norman Hoffman and Monèm Jemni
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(12), 1179; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121179 - 25 Nov 2024
Viewed by 2832
Abstract
Context: Spastic cerebral palsy (SCP) is a condition characterized by muscle stiffness and involuntary movements, which greatly affect movement abilities and overall well-being. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has emerged as a treatment option for managing spasticity, though the current evidence varies. Objective: This [...] Read more.
Context: Spastic cerebral palsy (SCP) is a condition characterized by muscle stiffness and involuntary movements, which greatly affect movement abilities and overall well-being. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has emerged as a treatment option for managing spasticity, though the current evidence varies. Objective: This systematic review seeks to assess the efficacy of LLLT on spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. We hope it will pinpoint areas where more research is needed and suggest directions for future studies. Method: A search of the literature was performed across databases, such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Elicit. The search utilized keywords and the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. Only studies conducted in English that focused on children with cerebral palsy (CP) and explored the effects of LLLT on spasticity were considered. The quality of the selected studies was evaluated using assessment tools. Results: The search identified 534 references, out of which eight studies met the screening criteria for inclusion. All cited papers indicated reductions in spasticity with further mention of reduced pain and greater muscle strength by some authors. Conclusions: This review indicates that LLLT shows promise in decreasing spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. Nevertheless, a lack of treatment parameters, heterogeneity in research methods, and a lack of objective outcome measures weaken the results. This review underscores the importance of standardized procedures and carefully planned randomized controlled trials to establish conclusive findings on the effectiveness of LLLT in this population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurorehabilitation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2945 KiB  
Systematic Review
Efficacy of Invasive and Non-Invasive Methods in Orthodontic Tooth Movement Acceleration: A Systematic Review
by Laura Castillo-Montaño, Pedro Colino-Gallardo, Hugo Baptista-Sanchez, Isabel Drewling, Mario Alvarado-Lorenzo, Laura Antonio-Zancajo and Carlos Colino-Paniagua
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(22), 10700; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210700 - 19 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1594
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this review was to evaluate the currently available scientific evidence on the efficacy of different methods as accelerators of tooth movement during orthodontic treatment: corticotomies, piezocision, micro-osteoperforations (MOP), photobiomodulation (LLLT and LED laser) and microvibrations. Search Methods: A comprehensive [...] Read more.
Objective: The aim of this review was to evaluate the currently available scientific evidence on the efficacy of different methods as accelerators of tooth movement during orthodontic treatment: corticotomies, piezocision, micro-osteoperforations (MOP), photobiomodulation (LLLT and LED laser) and microvibrations. Search Methods: A comprehensive search was performed in the PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus and Medline databases in May 2024. Selection Criteria: We selected randomized controlled trials based on acceleration of tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. Articles that were not randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were not published in the last ten years or corresponded to animal trials as well as those dealing with orthognathic surgery, distraction osteogenesis, electric currents, pulsed electric fields and pharmacological approaches were excluded. Results: Twenty-three studies were included in this review. All trials show accelerated tooth movement after low-level laser application, and seven studies support the efficacy of surgically assisted orthodontic treatment with corticotomies, piezocision or MOP. No article indicates statistically significant differences between the application of microvibration during orthodontic treatment and conventional treatment. No negative effects on the periodontium, loss of dental vitality or serious root resorption were reported in any publication, except in a study carried out with MOP (with an increase in root resorption). Conclusions: There is some evidence that low-level laser therapy and surgical methods are effective techniques in accelerating tooth movement during orthodontic treatment, while the evidence is very weak for vibration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2669 KiB  
Article
Clinical Efficacy of Two Different Low-Level Laser Therapies for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
by İrem Karagözoğlu, Nermin Demirkol, Özge Parlar Öz, Gökçe Keçeci, Beste Çetin and Mutlu Özcan
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(22), 6890; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226890 - 15 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2060
Abstract
Background: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a disease that causes severe pain that can seriously affect the quality of life. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two different low-level laser therapies (LLLT) as alternatives to medical treatment to reduce pain and improve [...] Read more.
Background: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a disease that causes severe pain that can seriously affect the quality of life. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two different low-level laser therapies (LLLT) as alternatives to medical treatment to reduce pain and improve the quality of life in patients with TN. Methods: A total of 45 patients were randomly divided into 3 groups. In the first group, a new-generation diode laser (GRR laser) was applied at predetermined points in the trigeminal nerve line. In the second group, a low-level neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser was applied along the affected nerve line. The placebo group received the same protocol with a Nd:YAG laser without the device switched on. The scores were recorded pre- and post-treatment using the Brief Pain Inventory-Facial (BPI-facial) scale. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the pre- and post-treatment values of all four variables in the GRR laser, Nd:YAG laser, and placebo groups. When the post-treatment values were compared, statistically significant differences were found between the groups in pain frequency, pain intensity, and interference in facial-specific activities, but no differences were found in general activities. Conclusions: Both LLLTs can be considered alternative treatment modalities for TN, but the GRR laser treatment was more effective than the Nd:YAG laser treatment in reducing pain and improving the quality of life in patients with TN. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Advances in Dental Health)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

25 pages, 5097 KiB  
Review
Non-Pharmacological Therapies for Management of Temporomandibular Myofascial Pain Syndrome: Laser Photobiomodulation or Dry Needling? Meta-Analyses of Human Clinical Trials
by Jumana Alsarhan, Rita El Feghali, Thaer Alkhudari and Stefano Benedicenti
Photonics 2024, 11(10), 965; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11100965 - 14 Oct 2024
Viewed by 2658
Abstract
This review aims to compare the effect of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) using visible and near-infrared diode laser wavelengths to that of the dry needling technique (DNT) on the management of orofacial pain in patients with Temporomandibular Disorder Myofascial Pain Syndrome (TMD/MPS) in term [...] Read more.
This review aims to compare the effect of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) using visible and near-infrared diode laser wavelengths to that of the dry needling technique (DNT) on the management of orofacial pain in patients with Temporomandibular Disorder Myofascial Pain Syndrome (TMD/MPS) in term of effectiveness, speed of recovery, and lasting of treatment. A systematic search of multiple electronic databases was carried out to identify the relevant clinical trials published between 1 January 2010 and 1 January 2024. The included studies were limited to human subjects who had orofacial pain associated with Axis 1 of TMD/MPS, involving two genders with age >18 years and were treated either with photobiomodulation using diode laser with wavelengths ranging from 600 up to 1200 nanometer (nm), or with the dry needling (DN) technique (superficial SDN or deep DDN), as a non-pharmacological therapies to decrease the intensity of orofacial pain associated with TMD/MPS. The risk of bias for included studies was assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool (for randomized studies). Three distinct meta-analyses were performed to quantify the pooled effects of PBM and DN in the management of TMD/MPS myofascial pain and deactivation of myofascial trigger points (MTPs). The meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 from Cochrane. The confidence interval (CI) was established at 95% and p-values of less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) were considered statistically significant. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using I2. Qualitative data were extracted and summarized in tables for each group study, while quantitative data were reported as Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) values for assessment variables in each sub-group study. The results among groups were systematically evaluated to draw the final conclusion. A rigorous electronic and manual search revealed 4150 possible articles. Following the application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, twelve eligible studies were included in the analysis. Both PBMT and DNT were found to be effective in controlling the myalgia pain and primary symptoms associated with TMD/MPS, as well as deactivating the MTPs. DNT was statistically superior in terms of recovery time while PBMT was the more effective long-term therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biophotonics and Biomedical Optics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop