Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (11)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = longwall top coal caving (LTCC)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 3659 KiB  
Article
Application of an Automated Top Coal Caving Control System: The Case of Wangjialing Coal Mine
by Yuming Huo, Dangwei Zhao, Defu Zhu and Zhonglun Wang
Sustainability 2024, 16(10), 4261; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104261 - 18 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1467
Abstract
China has made notable advancements in the intelligent construction of coal mines. However, for longwall top coal caving (LTCC) mining faces, a key obstacle impeding the intelligent transition of the coal-cutting process is automated control. This paper focuses on the aforementioned issue and [...] Read more.
China has made notable advancements in the intelligent construction of coal mines. However, for longwall top coal caving (LTCC) mining faces, a key obstacle impeding the intelligent transition of the coal-cutting process is automated control. This paper focuses on the aforementioned issue and comprehensively considers the pre-, intra-, and post-coal-caving stages. In this work, diverse detection and monitoring technologies are integrated at various stages through a computer platform, facilitating the construction of an automated coal caving control system with self-perception, self-learning, self-decision-making, and self-execution capabilities. Key technologies include ground-penetrating radar-based top coal thickness detection, inertial navigation-based shearer positioning, tail beam vibration-based identification of coal and gangue, and magnetostrictive sensor-based monitoring of the tail beam and insert plate attitude. In this study, the 12309 working face of the Wangjialing Coal Mine was experimentally validated, and the efficacy of the aforementioned key technologies was assessed. The results demonstrated that the control requirements for automated coal caving are satisfied by the maximum errors. Automatic regulation of coal caving was realized through the implementation of this system, thereby facilitating initiation and cessation and yielding promising experimental outcomes. Overall, this system offers practical insights for intelligent construction in current LTCC mining faces and the sustainable development of coal resources. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 11954 KiB  
Article
Study on Roof Instability Effect and Bearing Characteristics of Hydraulic Support in Longwall Top Coal Caving
by Qingliang Zeng, Zhaoji Li, Lirong Wan and Dejian Ma
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(14), 8102; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13148102 - 11 Jul 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 1561
Abstract
In longwall top coal caving (LTCC), due to the fracture and migration of top coal, the roof will break and collapse, which causes serious impact damage to hydraulic support. Therefore, we aimed to reveal the relationship between the roof instability effect and the [...] Read more.
In longwall top coal caving (LTCC), due to the fracture and migration of top coal, the roof will break and collapse, which causes serious impact damage to hydraulic support. Therefore, we aimed to reveal the relationship between the roof instability effect and the bearing characteristics of hydraulic support in the LTCC face. Based on the occurrence conditions of the 08 mining area in the Shilawusu Coal Mine, the instability model of the upper immediate roof was established, and the working resistance of hydraulic support was derived. Secondly, the dynamic coupling model of roof-top coal-hydraulic support was established in LS-DYNA, and the crushing degree of top coal and the bearing characteristics of the hydraulic support in different roof instability fields were analyzed. The results show that the main factors affecting the working resistance of hydraulic support are the fracture position of the upper immediate roof, the acting force of the lower immediate roof, and the distribution of the gangue in the goaf. The rotary instability of the upper immediate roof at the coal wall brings serious impact effects, resulting in fractures in front of the coal wall and a large amount of crushed coal concentrated at the front end of the canopy. The crushing degree of top coal significantly impacts the canopy, especially the back end of the canopy and the hinged pin shaft, which is prone to bending fracture. The research results can provide references and experience for the stability control of roof strata and the structural optimization of hydraulic support. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Slope Erosion Monitoring and Anti-erosion)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 12735 KiB  
Article
Techno-Economic Feasibility of the Longwall Top Coal Caving Method Based on the FTCD Index: A Parametric Case Study in India
by Nasina Balasubrahmanyam and Gnananandh Budi
Energies 2021, 14(19), 6115; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196115 - 26 Sep 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2794
Abstract
An extraction method for deep-seated thick seam deposits by underground mining with high resource recovery has remained a great challenge for Indian mining engineers, whereas the longwall top coal caving (LTCC) method has evolved as an effective method for various geo mining conditions [...] Read more.
An extraction method for deep-seated thick seam deposits by underground mining with high resource recovery has remained a great challenge for Indian mining engineers, whereas the longwall top coal caving (LTCC) method has evolved as an effective method for various geo mining conditions in China and other counties. The percentage of top coal recovery (TCR) plays a predominant role in determining the feasibility of LTCC, which relies on the First Top Coal Caving Distance (FTCD). In this paper, the critical geotechnical parameters are identified, numerically simulated, and statistically analyzed, and the FTCD for Indian geo-mining conditions is developed and validated. A financial assessment is conducted, considering 70% top coal recovery at 85% performance level, cost of production escalated by 20% and fall in coal grade by two grades. The internal rate of return (IRR) for LTCC is 30.24% as per the sensitivity analysis where it is only 18% in single pass longwall method. This study contributes to evaluating both the technical and economic feasibility of introducing LTCC in Indian geo-mining conditions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 10760 KiB  
Article
Longwall Top-Coal Caving Mechanism and Cavability Optimization with Hydraulic Fracturing in Thick Coal Seam: A Case Study
by Zhaohui Wang, Yuesong Tang and Hao Gong
Energies 2021, 14(16), 4832; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164832 - 8 Aug 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2763
Abstract
Longwall top-coal caving mechanisms and cavability optimization with hydraulic fracturing are analysed in this study. Based on the geological and geotechnical conditions of the Dongzhouyao coal mine, it is revealed that top-coal failure mechanisms are dominated by both compressive and tensile stresses. Ahead [...] Read more.
Longwall top-coal caving mechanisms and cavability optimization with hydraulic fracturing are analysed in this study. Based on the geological and geotechnical conditions of the Dongzhouyao coal mine, it is revealed that top-coal failure mechanisms are dominated by both compressive and tensile stresses. Ahead of the face line, shear failure initiates at the lower level of the top-coal and propagates to the upper level. Compressive stress-induced damage leads to obvious deterioration in tensile strength, causing the onset of tensile failure in the top-coal behind the face line. Accumulated plastic strain (APS) is selected as a top-coal cavability indicator. The cavability degrades gradually at the higher elevation of the top-coal while it is greatly strengthened as the top-coal approaches closer to the face line. In a thick coal seam without hydraulic fractures, the maximum APS occurs at the middle section of the face length in the Longwall top-coal caving (LTCC) panel. After hydraulic fracturing, top-coal cavability is significantly enhanced. But the spatial distribution of the APS transitions from uniform to non-uniform type due to the existence of hydraulic fractures, causing great variety in the cavability along the panel width. With increasing fracture intensity and fracture size, the failure zone expands significantly ahead of the longwall face, which means the cavability becomes increasingly favourable. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rock Burst Disasters in Coal Mines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 10214 KiB  
Article
Analysis of the Geomechanical Phenomena That Led to the Appearance of Sinkholes at the Lupeni Mine, Romania, in the Conditions of Thick Coal Seams Mining with Longwall Top Coal Caving
by Dacian-Paul Marian and Ilie Onica
Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 6449; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116449 - 6 Jun 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3091
Abstract
Thick coal seam no. 3, block V, Lupeni mine was mined by longwall top coal caving (LTCC). After the coal mining, the ground surface underwent continuous subsidence, but since 2008, three sinkholes have appeared on the surface with important dimensions, atypical for the [...] Read more.
Thick coal seam no. 3, block V, Lupeni mine was mined by longwall top coal caving (LTCC). After the coal mining, the ground surface underwent continuous subsidence, but since 2008, three sinkholes have appeared on the surface with important dimensions, atypical for the geo-mining conditions in this coal basin. This article is a synthesis of the study meant to decipher the geo-mechanical phenomenon that led to the emergence of these sinkholes and highlighting the main factors that contributed to the development of this phenomenon. For this purpose, measurements were made on the terrain deformations using photogrammetric methods and aerial laser scanning, when modeling with 3D finite elements, in elasto-plasticity and with the help of the Knothe–Budrik influence function. The factors that contributed to the occurrence of discontinuous subsidence phenomena are shallow mining depth, the LTCC mining method, and the presence of faults in the vicinity of the mining panels. Additionally, the geo-mechanical phenomena of subsidence terrace development and sinkholes in the mining subsidence troughs at the Lupeni mine were described. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Sustainability and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 8643 KiB  
Article
Numerical Investigation of Top Coal Drawing Evolution in Longwall Top Coal Caving by the Coupled Finite Difference Method-Discrete Element Method
by Yuming Huo, Defu Zhu, Zhonglun Wang and Xuanmin Song
Energies 2021, 14(1), 219; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14010219 - 4 Jan 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2340
Abstract
In longwall top coal caving (LTCC), the resource recovery ratio of the working face is directly determined by the top coal recovery ratio. An investigation of the evolution of top coal drawing characteristics and revealing the evolution of top coal drawing parameters is [...] Read more.
In longwall top coal caving (LTCC), the resource recovery ratio of the working face is directly determined by the top coal recovery ratio. An investigation of the evolution of top coal drawing characteristics and revealing the evolution of top coal drawing parameters is necessary when providing guidance for caving parameter selection and improving the top coal recovery ratio. Based on in-situ measurements of the size distribution of caved top coal blocks in Wangjialing coal mine, a finite difference method (FDM)–discrete element method (DEM) coupled method was applied to establish a “continuous–discontinuous” numerical model and the process from the first coal drawing to the common coal drawing was simulated with 17 separate working face advances. The evolution of the drawing body (DB), loose body (LB), and top coal boundary (TCB) was obtained. The results show that, the evolution of parameters of DB such as shape and size, drawing amount, length and deflection angle of the long axis of the profile ellipsoid tended to decrease first, then increase, decrease again, and finally stabilise; the increment of the LB advance coal wall distance and the coal pillar distance was close to 0 m in the common coal drawing stage, while width increment of the LB was close to the drawing interval (0.865 m). The TCB formed after each coal drawing round was fitted based on the improved “Hook” function. The evolution of height and radius of curvature of TCB’s stagnation point was analysed. This was divided into three stages: the first (first to third drawing rounds) was the initial mining influence stage, the second (fourth to ninth drawing rounds) was the transitional caving stage, and the third (after tenth drawing round) was the common coal drawing stage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section L: Energy Sources)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 14883 KiB  
Article
Numerical Investigation of Top-Coal Migration in the First Coal-Drawing Process by an FDM–DEM Coupling Method
by Yuming Huo, Xuanmin Song and Defu Zhu
Energies 2020, 13(20), 5493; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13205493 - 20 Oct 2020
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 2033
Abstract
In Longwall Top-Coal Caving (LTCC), the shape of the loose body (LB) and top-coal boundary (TCB) formed after the first coal-drawing are the initial conditions for the common coal-drawing period. Taking the Panel 12309 in Wangjialing coal mine as the research object, the [...] Read more.
In Longwall Top-Coal Caving (LTCC), the shape of the loose body (LB) and top-coal boundary (TCB) formed after the first coal-drawing are the initial conditions for the common coal-drawing period. Taking the Panel 12309 in Wangjialing coal mine as the research object, the weight of the blocks of caved top coal was measured on-site, and the distribution of their equivalent diameter was calculated. By using a coupled numerical method, the “Finite difference method (FDM)–Discrete element method (DEM)” numerical model was established, and the evolutions of the drawing body (DB), LB, and TCB were obtained. The results show that, in the initial stage of first coal-drawing (0–8.09 s), the amount of DB reached its maximum of 7.18 m3 (0.89 m3/s) and then decreased to a stable value of 0.44 m3/s. The relationships between the characteristic parameters of DB, LB, and TCB and the drawing time were fitted. Taking the second derivative of each parameter with respect to time as its sensitivity (η), it was concluded that due to the large coal-drawing volume in the initial stage (0–8.09 s), the values of the above parameters increased, and the sensitivities reached 6.02 × 10−3, 3.09 × 10−3, and 6.99 × 10−3, respectively. Here, the top-coal migration rule in the first coal-drawing process was revealed from the perspectives of DB, LB, and TCB, thus providing a theoretical basis for the further study of common coal-drawing processes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section L: Energy Sources)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 4087 KiB  
Article
In Situ Studies on the Characteristics of Strata Structures and Behaviors in Mining of a Thick Coal Seam with Hard Roofs
by Yiwen Lan, Rui Gao, Bin Yu and Xiangbin Meng
Energies 2018, 11(9), 2470; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092470 - 17 Sep 2018
Cited by 33 | Viewed by 3522
Abstract
The movements of overburden induced by mining a thick coal seam with a hard roof extend widely. The effects of breakages in the hard strata on the strata behaviors might vary with the overlying strata layers. For this reason, we applied a test [...] Read more.
The movements of overburden induced by mining a thick coal seam with a hard roof extend widely. The effects of breakages in the hard strata on the strata behaviors might vary with the overlying strata layers. For this reason, we applied a test method that integrated a borehole TV tester, borehole-based monitoring of strata movement, and monitoring of support resistance for an in situ investigation of a super-thick, 14–20 m coal seam mining in the Datong mining area in China. The results showed that the range of the overburden movement was significantly high, which could reach to more than 300 m. The key strata (KS) in the lower layer main roof were broken into a ‘cantilever beam and voussoir beam’ structure. This structure accounted for the ‘long duration and short duration’ strata behaviors in the working face. On the other hand, the hard KS in the upper layer broke into a ‘high layer structure’. The structural instability induced intensive and wide-ranging strata behaviors that lasted for a long time (two to three days). Support in the working face were over-pressured by large dynamic factors and were widely crushed, while the roadways were violently deformed. Hence, the structure of a thick coal seam with a hard roof after mining will form a ‘cantilever beam and voussoir beam and high layer structure’, which is unique to a large space stope. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 14272 KiB  
Article
A New Gob-Side Entry Layout for Longwall Top Coal Caving
by Guorui Feng, Pengfei Wang and Yoginder P. Chugh
Energies 2018, 11(5), 1292; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051292 - 18 May 2018
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 3233
Abstract
In China, gob-side entry is typically located one pillar-width (less than 5 m) away from the previously mined-out panel in a conventional longwall panel using top coal caving (LTCC). Design of gob-side entries is a challenge due to the complex dynamic loading process [...] Read more.
In China, gob-side entry is typically located one pillar-width (less than 5 m) away from the previously mined-out panel in a conventional longwall panel using top coal caving (LTCC). Design of gob-side entries is a challenge due to the complex dynamic loading process during their service life. A new gob-side entry (NGE) design practice is presented here for Zhenchengdi Colliery, which has many advantages. A theoretical analysis is presented followed by numerical modeling. The modeling included the double-yield constitutive model for gob behavior to analyze the stress environment for the gob-side entry with validation through field observations. The results indicate that pre-mining stress within gob occurred 51 m away from the gob edge. The NGE is located within a destressed zone in the entire panel system, which results in lower side abutment pressure for the adjacent panel to be mined. The stress concentration around the gob edge near the gob-side entry is relatively low (less than 0.1) compared with the other side of the gob. Field observations indicate that: (1) a simple support design, i.e., steel sets with wire mesh on the top, can maintain ground control and ventilation during active mining; (2) the periodic weighting interval is 9–12 m; (3) the length of the block “B” which “protects” the gob-side entry is 10–13 m; (4) stress distribution formula for the elevating section is derived; and (5) the roof pressure of the gob-side entry is much smaller than non-gob side entry and is smaller than the pre-mining stress. Deformation data of the gob-side entry shows that both roof-to-floor and rib-to-rib convergences are smaller than for the non-gob-side entry with an improved overall stress environment. Theoretical analysis, numerical modeling, and field observation are consistent, which validates the scientific foundations of the new technology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section L: Energy Sources)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 6011 KiB  
Article
Roof Strata Behavior and Support Resistance Determination for Ultra-Thick Longwall Top Coal Caving Panel: A Case Study of the Tashan Coal Mine
by Jun Guo, Guorui Feng, Pengfei Wang, Tingye Qi, Xiaorong Zhang and Yonggan Yan
Energies 2018, 11(5), 1041; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051041 - 24 Apr 2018
Cited by 42 | Viewed by 4617
Abstract
The Longwall Top Coal Caving (LTCC) method has greatly improved the production of ultra-thick underground coal resources. However, face fall and support closure have been becoming highly frequent accidents at the working face, and seriously threaten the safety of miners. The key to [...] Read more.
The Longwall Top Coal Caving (LTCC) method has greatly improved the production of ultra-thick underground coal resources. However, face fall and support closure have been becoming highly frequent accidents at the working face, and seriously threaten the safety of miners. The key to avoiding these problems is to reveal the structural evolution of the roof strata and then choose a reasonable working resistance for the hydraulic supports. According to physical modeling, theoretical analysis and field observation of the LTCC panel, four kinds of structural models can be found and defined, in consideration of the coincident movement of key strata (KS) and the mining activities of upper face in overburden strata. The KS are performed as cantilever structures, hinged structures and voussoir beam structures at three different positions in roof strata. The structural characteristics of the KS and its movement laws are shown in the four structural modes. The loads acting on the support in the four typical structural models are also analyzed. The structural instability of the broken roof strata on the upper caving panel caused by the lower ultra-thick coal seam mining is considered to be the main reason for its face’s falls and support failures. Consequently, a method is proposed for calculating the working resistance of the support in the LTCC face, which is verified by the mining pressure monitoring in practice. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 6594 KiB  
Article
Mechanism and Prevention of a Chock Support Failure in the Longwall Top-Coal Caving Faces: A Case Study in Datong Coalfield, China
by Zhu Li, Jialin Xu, Shengchao Yu, Jinfeng Ju and Jingmin Xu
Energies 2018, 11(2), 288; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11020288 - 24 Jan 2018
Cited by 36 | Viewed by 4866
Abstract
Longwall chock support failures seriously restrain the safety and high-efficiency of mining of extra thick coal seams, as well as causing a great waste of coal resources. During longwall top-coal caving (LTCC), the influential effect of the properties and the movement regulation of [...] Read more.
Longwall chock support failures seriously restrain the safety and high-efficiency of mining of extra thick coal seams, as well as causing a great waste of coal resources. During longwall top-coal caving (LTCC), the influential effect of the properties and the movement regulation of top-coal on strata behavior cannot be ignored, since the top-coal is the medium through which the load of the overlying strata is transferred to the chock supports. Taking Datong coalfield as an example, the mechanism of a chock support failure in the LTCC face was investigated. Research findings indicated that the hard top-coal and insufficient chock support capacity were primary reasons for chock support failure accidents. On account of the field-measured results, a new method to determine support capacity was proposed, which fully took the impact of the top-coal strength into consideration. The calculation revealed that the required support capacity had exceeded the existing production maximum, at about 22,000 KN. Since it was unrealistic to simply increase chock support capacity, other approaches, according to the theoretical analysis, were proposed, such as lowering the integrity and strength of the top-coal, and upgrading its crushing effect to weaken the support load effectively during the weighting period, which reduces the likelihood of chock support accidents occurring. Based on this, hydraulic fracturing for hard top-coal and optimization of the caving process (chock supports raised up and down repeatedly by manual operation before moving forward) were presented. The proposed solutions were successfully applied in LTCC-west8101 for subsequent mining and achieved substantial benefits. The above research provides valuable references and ideas for the control of strata behavior to ensure safe and highly efficient mining in extremely thick and hard coal seams with the LTCC method. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section L: Energy Sources)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop