Search Results (73)

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a progressive, multifactorial complication of diabetes and one of the major global causes of visual impairment. Its pathogenesis involves chronic hyperglycaemia-induced oxidative stress, inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, neurodegeneration, and pathological angiogenesis, as well as emerging systemic contributors such as gut microbiota dysregulation. While current treatments, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents, corticosteroids, and laser photocoagulation, have shown clinical efficacy, they are largely limited to advanced stages of DR, require repeated invasive procedures, and do not adequately address early neurovascular and metabolic abnormalities. Resveratrol (RSV), a naturally occurring polyphenol, has emerged as a promising candidate due to its potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, and anti-angiogenic properties. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the molecular mechanisms by which RSV exerts protective effects in DR, including modulation of oxidative stress pathways, suppression of inflammatory cytokines, enhancement of mitochondrial function, promotion of autophagy, and inhibition of pathological neovascularisation. Despite its promising pharmacological profile, the clinical application of RSV is limited by poor aqueous solubility, rapid systemic metabolism, and low ocular bioavailability. Various routes of administration, including intravitreal injection, topical instillation, and oral and sublingual delivery, have been investigated to enhance its therapeutic potential. Recent advances in drug delivery systems, including nanoformulations, liposomal carriers, and sustained-release intravitreal implants, offer potential strategies to address these challenges. This review also explores RSV’s role in combination therapies, its potential as a disease-modifying agent in early-stage DR, and the relevance of personalised medicine approaches guided by metabolic and genetic factors. Overall, the review highlights the therapeutic potential and the key translational challenges in positioning RSV as a multi-targeted treatment strategy for DR. Full article

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of sutureless scleral-fixated (SSF) Soleko Fil Carlevale intraocular lens (SC-IOL) implants associated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in patients with aphakia secondary to complicated cataract surgery or IOL luxation nationwide. Methods: A multicenter, national, retrospective study of 268 eyes (268 patients) which underwent simultaneous PPV and SC-IOL implantation was conducted. Demographics; ocular data; pre-surgical, surgical and post-surgical details; and refractive results were collected. Intra- and postoperative complications and management details were described. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were collected at 1 week and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed to assess the cumulative probability of postoperative BCVA, IOP levels, macular edema (ME) and corneal decompensation. Results: The cumulative probability of final VA ≤ 0.3 logMAR was 64.4% at 12 months follow-up. The probability of IOP > 21, ≥25 and ≥30 mmHg was 29.8%, 16.9% and 10.1%, respectively, and the cumulative probability of IOP-lowering treatment was 42.3% at 12 months. Glaucoma surgery was required in 3.7% of the eyes (10/268). The cumulative probability of postoperative ME development was 26.6% at 12 months, managed with topical treatment alone (73.5%) and intravitreal injections (26.5%). Corneal transplantation was required in 3.7% of the eyes (10/268). Conclusions: Sutureless scleral-fixated SC-IOL is an adequate therapeutic alternative in the management of aphakia with good visual results and an acceptable safety profile in routine clinical care. Longer-term studies are needed to evaluate its results and complications compared to other therapeutic alternatives. Full article

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) refractory to intravitreal injections (IVIs) and without vitreomacular traction. Methods: In this retrospective consecutive case series, we included patients that underwent PPV with ILM peeling for refractory DME. Examination was performed at baseline, and at the 1- and 6-month follow-up. Primary endpoints were best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). Results: A total of 15 eyes were included, and BCVA improved from 0.69 ± 0.27 logMAR preoperatively to 0.48 ± 0.28 logMAR at the 1-month (p = 0.013) follow-up and 0.42 ± 0.29 logMAR at the 6-month (p < 0.001) follow-up. At the 6-month follow-up, 10 eyes (66.6%) gained at least two lines of vision. The BCVA of pseudophakic eyes (nine eyes) improved from 0.64 ± 0.21 logMAR at baseline to 0.40 ± 0.26 logMAR at the 6-month follow-up (p = 0.02). CMT decreased from 457 ± 114 µm preoperatively to 336 ± 112 µm at the 1-month (p = 0.035) follow-up and 302 ± 68 µm at the 6-month (p = 0.001) follow-up. During follow-up, only two eyes received IVIs: one following vitreous hemorrhage and one for persistent DME. Conclusion: PPV with ILM peeling improves BCVA and reduces CMT in eyes with DME refractory to IVIs up to the 6-month follow-up. Full article

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of vision loss among diabetic patients. The first-line treatments for DME are anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-drugs, while intravitreal steroids are generally reserved for second-line treatment. Limited data exist on the role of optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers as predictors of success in non-responders to anti-VEGF treatment undergoing simultaneous cataract surgery and dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX-I). Methods: This study was designed as a retrospective analysis of patients with DME who were refractory to anti-VEGF treatment but underwent cataract surgery and received a DEX-I at the time of surgery. All procedures were performed between May 2021 and February 2024. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfoveal thickness (CST) were recorded at baseline and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. The following OCT-based biomarkers were also collected: ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity, disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL), CST, and hyperreflective foci (HRF). Correlations between the baseline biomarkers and the anatomical outcome were analyzed using linear mixed models (LMMs). Results: Eleven patients (eighteen eyes) met the inclusion criteria. The mean CST decreased significantly from 469.4 ± 53.8 µm at baseline, to 373.1 ± 34.7 µm at 1 week (p = 0.002) and 354.4 ± 24.1 µm at 1 month (p = 0.011). The mean BCVA improved significantly from 0.47 LogMAR to 0.33 LogMAR at 1 week (p = 0.001), 0.23 LogMAR at 1 month (p < 0.001), and 0.25 LogMAR at 3 months (p < 0.001). Baseline predictors significantly influencing CST included the presence of DRIL, a disrupted/absent EZ, and a higher CST. Conclusions: The administration of DEX-I for DME refractory to anti-VEGF treatment in patients undergoing cataract surgery promoted functional improvements persisting longer than the anatomical ones. Patients presenting with DRIL, disrupted EZ, and higher CST at baseline may be better candidates for the combination of DEX-I and cataract surgery. Full article

Complex anatomical and physiological barriers make the eye a challenging organ to treat from a drug delivery perspective. Currently available treatment methods (topical eyedrops) for anterior segment diseases pose several limitations in terms of bioavailability and patient compliance. Conventional drug delivery methods to treat posterior segment ocular diseases are primarily intravitreal injection (IVT) of solutions. IVT is highly invasive and leads to retinal toxicity, endophthalmitis, and intraocular inflammation, frequently requiring professional administration and frequent clinical visits. Advanced drug delivery treatment strategies could improve patient compliance and convenience. Long-acting drug delivery platforms (biodegradable or nonbiodegradable) provide sustained/controlled release of drugs for at least four to six months. Smart drug delivery alternatives, for instance, in situ forming implants, are injectable formulations that form semisolid-to-solid implants in response to the various stimuli of pH, light, osmolarity, and temperature. Additionally, nanoparticulate drug delivery systems, contact lenses, electrospun patches, and microneedle-based drug delivery systems provide minimally invasive treatment options for ocular disorders. This comprehensive review focuses on advanced drug delivery options for the management of ocular disorders. Full article

Background/Objectives: This case report presents a unique case of multiple postoperative complications, including sterile silicone implant extrusion, symblepharon formation, and the development of a giant cyst, following extensive multimodal chemotherapy for unilateral retinoblastoma in a pediatric patient. The case was further complicated by recurrent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization, which persisted despite multiple eradication attempts. Methods: A 5-year-old boy presented with right-sided proptosis one year after receiving a secondary dermis-fat orbital graft. He had undergone 12 cycles of intravitreal, intra-arterial, and systemic chemotherapy as well as thermotherapy and cryotherapy due to recurrent retinoblastoma in the right eye. Following a third relapse, secondary enucleation was performed with a primary silicone orbital implant. However, extrusion of the implant occurred, and an orbital swab confirmed MRSA colonization. A secondary dermis-fat graft was harvested and implanted after ensuring MRSA clearance. A year later, the child developed rapid right-sided proptosis. Ultrasound revealed a cyst within the dermis-fat graft measured 23.6 mm in anteroposterior diameter. Surgery was postponed due to chickenpox, and the cyst enlarged reaching an anteroposterior diameter of 26.7 mm over two months. A complete excision was performed. Results: The surgery was uneventful. Intraoperative orbital swab was sterile, but MRSA was detected in a conjunctival swab, leading to treatment with local moxifloxacin drops and oral rifampicin. Conclusions: Giant cyst formation in a dermis-fat graft is an extremely rare complication. Complete excision remains the treatment of choice. However, in this case, it resulted in persistent anophthalmic socket syndrome, posing further reconstructive challenges. Full article

Background and Objectives: To investigate anatomical and functional outcomes in different morphological subtypes of diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with an intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) over 6 months follow-up. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, comparative study on patients with DME who received an intravitreal dexamethasone implant. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfoveal thickness (CST) and maximum CST on optical coherence tomography (OCT) were measured. The recruits were divided into three groups based on the morphological patterns of DME: serous retinal detachment (SRD), cystic macular edema (CME) and diffuse retinal thickening (DRT). The presence or absence of previous treatment were considered as being previously treated with anti-VEGF (PT) vs. naïve eyes (TN). All subjects received a single injection of the dexamethasone implant. The primary outcomes included changes in BCVA, CST and CSTMax at 2-, 4- and 6-months of follow-up. Results: CST was significantly reduced following one dexamethasone injection in the whole cohort from a total mean value of 513.3 μm to 368.2 μm at 2 months, 447.2 μm at 4 months and 471.5 μm at 6 months. The change in CST was significantly greater in SRD as opposed to the DRT and CME group at all time points. Overall, BCVA improved from 0.82 at baseline to 0.75 and 0.76 LogMAR at 2 and 4 months, respectively, whilst showing an overall deterioration to 0.84 at 6 months. The CME group showed the best BCVA at 6 months. Concerning treatment status (TN vs. PT), there was no significant difference in CST at 2 and 4 months, while CST was reduced at 6 months for the PT group (p = 0.023). Similarly, BCVA was significantly better in the PT group at 6 months (p = 0.017). Conclusions: The dexamethasone implant was effective in reducing DME and providing short-term BCVA improvement. The presence of SRD was associated with more favorable anatomical results, while CME was associated with better visual acuity. Dexamethasone provided superior results in previously treated patients. Full article

Background/Objectives: Cystoid macular edema (CMO) is a common complication that follows cataract surgery, presenting management challenges due to the lack of standardized treatment guidelines and the potential for spontaneous resolution. This study aimed to evaluate various treatment modalities for post-operative CMO, including topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), periocular steroids, and intravitreal injections. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to assess the efficacy of different treatment approaches for post-operative CMO. Studies evaluating topical NSAIDs, periocular steroids, intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (TCA), dexamethasone implants (Ozurdex), and intravitreal bevacizumab were included. The main outcomes assessed included improvements in vision, resolution of CMO, recurrence rates, and safety profile. Results: Topical NSAIDs, particularly ketorolac and diclofenac, showed effectiveness in acute CMO, while their efficacy in chronic cases was variable. Periocular steroids, including retrobulbar TCA and sub-Tenon injections, demonstrated significant improvements in vision and the resolution of CMO, especially in cases resistant to topical therapy. Intravitreal TCA and dexamethasone implants exhibited variable effects on CMO resolution and recurrence rates, with some studies reporting sustained improvements over 12 months. The role of intravitreal bevacizumab as initial therapy remains unclear, although it may be considered in cases unresponsive to steroids. Conclusions: Topical NSAIDs, often combined with periocular steroids, serve as first-line therapy, with periocular steroids offering additional efficacy in resistant cases. Further research is needed to establish optimal treatment algorithms and improve outcomes for patients with post-operative CMO Full article

Background/Objectives: This study evaluated the outcomes of early versus late switching from intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy to dexamethasone (DEX) implants in patients with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). The critical role of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in guiding therapeutic decisions and monitoring treatment responses is emphasized. Methods: In this real-world, retrospective study, 61 treatment-naïve CRVO patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (early switch after three anti-VEGF injections) and Group 2 (late switch after six months of anti-VEGF therapy). High-resolution OCT was employed at all follow-ups to evaluate anatomical outcomes, specifically changes in central macular subfield thickness (CMST), while best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed using standardized ETDRS charts. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in BCVA and reductions in CMST over 52 weeks. Group 1 exhibited slightly greater gains in BCVA (+20.3 ETDRS letters) and a greater CMST reduction (−201.5 µm) compared to Group 2 (+18.5 ETDRS letters, −184.4 µm), although the differences were not statistically significant. The OCT findings enabled precise monitoring and individualized treatment adjustments, reducing the treatment burden in the early-switch group with fewer anti-VEGF injections. Conclusions: Early switching to DEX implants, guided by OCT findings, may optimize therapeutic outcomes and reduce the treatment burden, particularly in real-world settings with limited resources or adherence challenges. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating advanced imaging techniques into routine practice, and underscore the need for further research on OCT-guided therapeutic transitions in macular edema management. Full article

Background/Purpose: This study compared the effects of three induction doses of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) on diabetic macular edema (DME) with that of long-term treatment using biomarkers to find out the predictability potential of early response to anti-VEGF treatment for the long-term restorative effect. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and optical coherence tomography (OCT) data of 71 DME eyes treated with three monthly anti-VEGF doses and followed for 1 year. BCVA, central subfield thickness (CST), subretinal fluid (SRF), intraretinal cysts, hyperreflective foci (HF), disorganization of inner retinal layers (DRILs), ellipsoid zone/external limiting membrane (EZ/ELM) integrity, and vitreoretinal relationships were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: Patients (50.7% male) had a mean follow-up of 12 months. After three anti-VEGF doses, 19 eyes required no additional injections, 25 continued anti-VEGF, 20 switched to dexamethasone implants, and seven received combination therapy. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 0.52 to 0.40 logMAR at 3 months, 0.30 at 6 months, and stabilized at 0.40 at 12 months. CST decreased from 406 µm to 317 µm at 3 months and 307 µm at 12 months. Significant early improvements in BCVA, CST, SRF, and intraretinal cysts were sustained in the long-term follow-up. HF reduction became significant after 6 months, while DRIL and EZ/ELM integrity remained unchanged. Conclusions: The improvement of OCT biomarkers in DME patients supported that intravitreal anti-VEGF significantly restored the retinal microstructure, which was already evident at 3 months in the control after anti-VEGF induction. Full article

Objectives: to evaluate the efficacy of 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implant in the treatment of patients with diabetic macular edema through mean retinal sensitivity (MRS), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and fixation stability. Methods: patients (n = 50) with DME, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.1 logMAR, and central retinal thickness (CRT) of ≥300 μm determined by optical coherence tomography were treated with 0.7 mg slow-release dexamethasone, and endpoints were evaluated one and three months after the injection. Results: The best corrected visual acuity, BCVA, whose mean values at baseline were 0.42 logMAR, improved significantly post dexamethasone injection, with mean values of 0.20 logMAR at one month and 0.24 logMAR at three months. The mean central retinal thickness, CRT, was 463 µm at baseline increasing to 297 µm at one month, and 315 µm at three months. Mean retinal sensitivity (MRS) was 12.31 dB at baseline. In line with other parameters, MRS also showed significant improvement at one month after slow-release dexamethasone treatment, with a mean value of 15.35 Db and the improvement was sustained at three months after injection, with a mean value of 14.71 dB. Fixation stability was assessed using the area of the third BCEA ellipse. At baseline, patients had an ellipse area of 53.68 degrees. At one month after injection, patients showed an improvement, with a mean ellipse area of 5.23 degrees, which was maintained at three months, with a mean ellipse area of 4.13 degrees. Conclusions: The dexamethasone implant of 0.7 mg met the efficacy endpoint for improvement in MRS, BCVA, CRT and fixation stability. Full article

Background/Objectives: The fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAI) is an intravitreal corticosteroid implant designed to have a therapeutic effect lasting up to 3 years. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of the FAI (0.19 mg, releasing at 0.2 μg/day) in patients with non-infectious uveitis. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were last searched on 6 September 2024. Studies comparing FAI with sham injections were investigated. The primary outcome was the recurrence of uveitis. Secondary outcomes included visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and occurrence of cataracts. Results: Significantly more patients in the FAI group experienced no uveitis recurrence for up to 36 months compared to the sham group, with a relatively lower number of recurrences. Systemic adjuvant therapy was similar between groups, while fewer patients required local rescue injections in the FAI group (95% confidence interval (CI): −2.91 to −1.70). Visual acuity changes and the proportion of eyes with ≥15 letters gain were not significantly different between the groups. More patients needed cataract surgery in the FAI group (95% CI: 0.68–1.96). No differences were observed in IOP change, final IOP, or treatment-requiring events related to an increased IOP. However, more subjects experienced events of IOP > 25 mmHg with the FAI (95% CI: 0.73 to 2.14). Conclusions: The 0.19 mg FAI was effective in preventing uveitis recurrence, and reduced the need for local injections. No significant impacts were noted in terms of systemic therapy, visual improvement, or most IOP-related complications. Full article

Background: The PreserFlo™ MicroShunt (PFMS) is a bleb-forming device considered to be less invasive than traditional glaucoma surgery such as trabeculectomy. This study evaluates the 1-year success rates as well as safety profile of PFMS in patients having high intraocular pressure (IOP) and/or glaucoma refractory to drop therapy with a history of prior intravitreal dexamethasone therapy. Methods: A total of 16 eyes after PFMS implantation due to elevated IOP after intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX-I) administration were included in this retrospective cohort study. Success rates and secondary outcomes were evaluated. Results: Qualified and complete success rates at 12 months, respectively, were 14/16 and 12/16 eyes for criterion A, 13/16 and 11/16 eyes for B, 13/16 and 11/16 eyes for C, and 6/16 and 6/16 eyes for D. The overall mean (range) preoperative IOP decreased from 27 (16–38) mmHg to 13 (10–17) mmHg at 12 months. BCVA was not significantly different up to 12 months (p = 0.63). The preoperative mean (range) number of medications decreased from 3.56 (2–4) to 0.31 (0–3) at 12 months. One eye underwent needling twice, and two eyes were revised surgically. One patient needed replacement of the PFMS. There were no hypotony-related complications. Conclusions: The PFMS is an effective surgical option for patients with steroid-induced IOP elevation. It demonstrates satisfactory short-term success rates, a reduced need for pressure-lowering eye drops, an excellent safety profile with minimal postoperative care, and a low complication rate. Additional interventions such as needling or revisions were infrequently necessary. However, PFMS may not be the ideal choice for cases requiring a low target pressure (≤12 mmHg). Full article

Background: In this study, we evaluated the incidence of cystoid macular edema (CME) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for different retinal pathologies and assessed the role of optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers in guiding treatment decisions in post-surgical CME patients who were refractory to medical therapy over a follow-up period of 12 months. Methods: Medical records of consecutive pseudophakic patients, who underwent PPV for different retinal pathologies, were retrospectively evaluated in this single-center, uncontrolled study. The incidence of post-PPV CME was assessed. Eyes with post-PPV CME in the first 2 months after surgery, with available clinical and OCT data for 12 months after surgery, were included in the evaluation. The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; logMAR), mean central macular thickness (CMT; μm) change, and response to different treatments [medical therapy and intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant] were evaluated 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after PPV. The impact of OCT biomarkers on the exposure to DEX implants was assessed. Adverse events, potentially related to the treatment, were investigated as well. Results: Of the 346 pseudophakic patients (352 eyes) who participated in this study, 54 (54 eyes) developed CME within the first 2 months after PPV (incidence of 15.3%). Among them, 48 patients were deemed eligible for the 12-month analysis. Preoperative mean BCVA (1.44 ± 0.99 logMAR) significantly improved to 0.32 ± 0.37 logMAR after 12 months (p < 0.001). The mean baseline CMT of 347 (±123.5) μm significantly decreased to 290 μm (±80.4; p = 0.003) by the end of the follow-up. Twenty-five eyes (52%) required one or more DEX implants for CME, due to being refractory to topical therapy. Significant correlations were found between the mean CMT values at various time points. Additionally, patients who required DEX implants at months 3 and 9 were more likely to present intraretinal fluid (IRF), disorganization of inner retinal layers (DRIL), disorganization of outer retinal layers (DROL), and hyper-reflective foci (HRF) at 1-month OCT. Five patients experienced a slight increase in intraocular pressure (IOP), which was successfully managed with topical medication. Conclusions: Topical therapy alone can be a valuable option for post-PPV CME in approximately 50% of patients. Significant visual recovery and macular thickness reduction at 12 months demonstrated that DEX implants can be a safe and effective second-line treatment for pseudophakic patients with post-PPV CME and who are refractory to medical therapy. Early post-surgical OCT biomarkers may indicate a more severe CME that might benefit from the steroid implant. Full article

Background and Aim: Despite the abundant literature, internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling remains a controversial topic, especially in diabetic eyes. We compared the safety and effectiveness of intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT)-assisted selective epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling with dye-assisted ERM and ILM peeling, for the treatment of tractional diabetic macular edema (tDME). Material and Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we evaluated consecutive patients with tDME who underwent iOCT-assisted selective ERM peeling (Group A) or “dual blue” dye-assisted ERM and ILM peeling (Group B). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were compared over a 12-month follow-up. A linear mixed model analysis was performed. Results: At baseline, the two groups were comparable in terms of their demographic and clinical outcomes. No significant difference between BCVA and CMT was observed among the groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in outcomes at the last follow-up (p < 0.001), although only iOCT-assisted ERM peeling ensured significant visual gain and macular thinning (p < 0.001) one month after surgery. A significant effect of time on both outcomes (p < 0.001) and of time–treatment interaction on visual change (p = 0.02) were observed. In eight patients, macular edema recurred (Group A: two patients; Group B: six patients) and was managed with an intravitreal dexamethasone implant. In Group A, one patient developed a recurrence of ERM without the need for reoperation. Conclusions: iOCT-assisted ERM removal may be as effective as dye-assisted ERM and ILM peeling to treat tDME. Additionally, it ensures a quicker recovery of visual function and macular thickness. The observed ERM recurrence within the 1-year follow-up was mild and did not necessitate additional surgery. Full article