Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (14)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = intraoperative MRI (iMRI)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
9 pages, 1368 KiB  
Article
Comparing the Rates of Further Resection After Intraoperative MRI Visualisation of Residual Tumour Between Brain Tumour Subtypes: A 17-Year Single-Centre Experience
by Daniel Madani, R. Dineth Fonseka, Sihyong Jake Kim, Patrick Tang, Krishna Muralidharan, Nicholas Chang and Johnny Wong
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(1), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15010045 - 5 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 985
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maximal safe resection is the objective of most neuro-oncological operations. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) may guide the surgeon to improve the extent of safe resection. There is limited evidence comparing the impact of iMRI on the rates of further resection between [...] Read more.
BACKGROUND: Maximal safe resection is the objective of most neuro-oncological operations. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) may guide the surgeon to improve the extent of safe resection. There is limited evidence comparing the impact of iMRI on the rates of further resection between tumour types. AIM: To investigate the impact of iMRI on the rate of further resection following visualisation of residual tumour. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study identified all intracranial tumour operations performed in the 1.5 T iMRI machine of a single centre (2007–2023). Patients were identified using SurgiNet and were grouped according to their histopathological diagnosis in accordance with the WHO 2021 classification. The primary outcome was the rate of reoperation due to iMRI visualisation of residual tumours. RESULTS: A total of 574 cases were identified, including 152 low-grade gliomas (LGG), 108 high-grade gliomas (HGG), 194 pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs), 15 metastases, and 6 meningiomas. Further resection following iMRI visualisation occurred in 45% of LGG cases, 47% of HGG cases, 29% of PitNET cases, and no meningioma or metastasis cases. Chi-square analysis showed that the rate of further resection after iMRI use across 2018–2023 was significantly higher than that across 2007–2012 (46% versus 33%, p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative MRI for guiding further resection was most useful in cases of LGG and HGG, possibly reflecting the difficulty of differentiating these tumour types from normal brain tissue. In addition, there was increased reliance on iMRI over time, which may represent our surgeons becoming accustomed to its use. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neuro-oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2677 KiB  
Article
Role of Virtual iMRI in Glioblastoma Surgery: Advantages, Limitations, and Correlation with iCT and Brain Shift
by Erica Grasso, Francesco Certo, Mario Ganau, Giulio Bonomo, Giuseppa Fiumanò, Giovanni Buscema, Andrea Maugeri, Antonella Agodi and Giuseppe M. V. Barbagallo
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(1), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15010035 - 31 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1117
Abstract
Background: Elastic image fusion (EIF) using an intraoperative CT (iCT) scan may enhance neuronavigation accuracy and compensate for brain shift. Objective: To evaluate the safety and reliability of the EIF algorithm (Virtual iMRI Cranial 4.5, Brainlab AG, Munich Germany, for the [...] Read more.
Background: Elastic image fusion (EIF) using an intraoperative CT (iCT) scan may enhance neuronavigation accuracy and compensate for brain shift. Objective: To evaluate the safety and reliability of the EIF algorithm (Virtual iMRI Cranial 4.5, Brainlab AG, Munich Germany, for the identification of residual tumour in glioblastoma surgery. Moreover, the impact of brain shift on software reliability is assessed. Methods: This ambispective study included 80 patients with a diagnosis of glioblastoma. Pre-operative MRI was elastically fused with an intraoperative CT scan (BodyTom; Samsung-Neurologica, Danvers, MA, USA) acquired at the end of the resection. Diagnostic specificity and the sensitivity of each tool was determined. The impact of brain shift on residual tumour was statistically analysed. An analysis of accuracy was performed through Target Registration Error (TRE) measurement after rigid image fusion (RIF) and EIF. A qualitative evaluation of each Virtual MRI image (VMRI) was performed. Results: VMRI identified residual tumour in 26/80 patients (32.5%), confirmed by post-operative MRI (true positive). Of these, 5 cases were left intentionally due to DES-positive responses, 8 cases underwent near maximal or subtotal resection, and 13 cases were not detected by iCT. However, in the other 27/80 cases (33.8%), VMRI reported residual tumour that was present neither on iCT nor on post-operative MRI (false positive). i-CT showed a sensitivity of 56% and specificity of 100%; VMRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 50%. Spearman correlation analysis showed a moderate correlation between pre-operative volume and VMRI tumour residual. Moreover, tumour involving insula or infiltrating more than one lobe displayed higher median values (p = 0.023) of virtual residual tumour. A statistically significant reduction towards lower TRE values after EIF was observed for test structures. Conclusions: Virtual iMRI was proven to be a feasible option to detect residual tumour. Its integration within a multimodal imaging protocol may provide neurosurgeons with intraoperatively updated imaging. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Clinical Technologies in Treating Neurosurgical Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 615 KiB  
Article
Navigating Brain Metastases: Unveiling the Potential of 3-Tesla Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
by Ghaith Altawalbeh, Maria Goldberg, Michel Gustavo Mondragón-Soto, Chiara Negwer, Arthur Wagner, Jens Gempt, Bernhard Meyer and Amir Kaywan Aftahy
Cancers 2024, 16(16), 2774; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16162774 - 6 Aug 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1630
Abstract
Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) has witnessed significant growth in the field of neurosurgery, particularly in glioma surgery, enhancing image-guided neuronavigation and optimizing the extent of resection (EOR). Despite its extensive use in the treatment of gliomas, its utility in brain metastases (BMs) [...] Read more.
Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) has witnessed significant growth in the field of neurosurgery, particularly in glioma surgery, enhancing image-guided neuronavigation and optimizing the extent of resection (EOR). Despite its extensive use in the treatment of gliomas, its utility in brain metastases (BMs) remains unexplored. This study examined the effect of iMRI on BM resection. This retrospective study was conducted at the neurosurgical center of the University Hospital of the Technical University of Munich and involved 25 patients with BM who underwent resection using 3-Tesla iMRI between 2018 and 2022. Volumetric measurements of the resected contrast-enhancing metastases were performed using preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative MRI images. The Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) and neurological status of the patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Local recurrence and in-brain progression were reported in patients who underwent follow-up MRI at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. In this cohort (n = 25, mean age 63.6 years), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the most common origin (28%). The mean surgical duration was 219.9 min, and that of iMRI was 61.7 min. Indications for iMRI were primarily associated with preoperative imaging, suggesting an unclear entity that is often suspicious for glioma. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 21 patients (84%). Continued resection was pursued after iMRI in six cases (24%), resulting in an improved EOR of 100% in five cases and 97.6% in one case. Neurological status postoperatively remained stable in 60%, improved in 24%, and worsened in 16% of patients. No wound healing or postoperative complications were observed. Among the thirteen patients who underwent follow-up MRI 3 months postoperatively, one patient showed local recurrence at the site of resection, and seven patients showed in-brain progression. Of the eight patients who underwent a 6-month follow-up MRI, two showed local recurrence, while three exhibited in-brain progression. The observed favorable profiles of GTR, coupled with the notable absence of wound-healing problems and acute postoperative complications, affirm the safety and feasibility of incorporating iMRI into the neurosurgical workflow for resecting BM with specific indications. The real-time imaging capabilities of iMRI offer unparalleled precision, aiding meticulous tumor delineation and informed decision-making, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes. Although our experience suggests the potential benefits of iMRI as a safe tool for enhancing EOR, we acknowledge the need for larger prospective clinical trials. Comprehensive investigations on a broader scale are imperative to further elucidate the specific indications for iMRI in the context of BMs and to study its impact on survival. Rigorous prospective studies will refine our understanding of the clinical scenarios in which iMRI can maximize its impact, guiding neurosurgeons toward more informed and tailored decision-making. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain Metastases: Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 258 KiB  
Review
Critical Assessment of Cancer Characterization and Margin Evaluation Techniques in Brain Malignancies: From Fast Biopsy to Intraoperative Flow Cytometry
by Ioannis Liaropoulos, Alexandros Liaropoulos and Konstantinos Liaropoulos
Cancers 2023, 15(19), 4843; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15194843 - 3 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1779
Abstract
Brain malignancies, given their intricate nature and location, present significant challenges in both diagnosis and treatment. This review critically assesses a range of diagnostic and surgical techniques that have emerged as transformative tools in brain malignancy management. Fast biopsy techniques, prioritizing rapid and [...] Read more.
Brain malignancies, given their intricate nature and location, present significant challenges in both diagnosis and treatment. This review critically assesses a range of diagnostic and surgical techniques that have emerged as transformative tools in brain malignancy management. Fast biopsy techniques, prioritizing rapid and minimally invasive tissue sampling, have revolutionized initial diagnostic stages. Intraoperative flow cytometry (iFC) offers real-time cellular analysis during surgeries, ensuring optimal tumor resection. The advent of intraoperative MRI (iMRI) has seamlessly integrated imaging into surgical procedures, providing dynamic feedback and preserving critical brain structures. Additionally, 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) has enhanced surgical precision by inducing fluorescence in tumor cells, aiding in their complete resection. Several other techniques have been developed in recent years, including intraoperative mass spectrometry methodologies. While each technique boasts unique strengths, they also present potential limitations. As technology and research continue to evolve, these methods are set to undergo further refinement. Collaborative global efforts will be pivotal in driving these advancements, promising a future of improved patient outcomes in brain malignancy management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flow Cytometry in Cancer Research)
9 pages, 1895 KiB  
Article
Increasing Patient Safety and Treatment Quality by Using Intraoperative MRI for Organ-Preserving Tumor Resection and High-Dose Rate Brachytherapy in Children with Bladder/Prostate and Perianal Rhabdomyosarcoma
by Andreas Schmidt, Constantin Roder, Franziska Eckert, David Baumann, Maximilian Niyazi, Frank Fideler, Ulrike Ernemann, Marcos Tatagiba, Jürgen Schäfer, Cristian Urla, Simon Scherer, Jörg Fuchs, Frank Paulsen and Benjamin Bender
Cancers 2023, 15(13), 3505; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15133505 - 5 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1920
Abstract
In children with bladder/prostate (BP) and perianal rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), we use a hybrid treatment concept for those suitable, combining organ-preserving tumor resection and high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). This treatment concept has been shown to improve outcomes. However, it is associated with specific challenges [...] Read more.
In children with bladder/prostate (BP) and perianal rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), we use a hybrid treatment concept for those suitable, combining organ-preserving tumor resection and high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). This treatment concept has been shown to improve outcomes. However, it is associated with specific challenges for the clinicians. The exact position of the tubes for BT is a prerequisite for precise radiotherapy. It can finally be determined only with an MRI or CT scan. We evaluated the use of an intraoperative MRI (iMRI) to control the position of the BT tubes and for radiotherapy planning in all patients with BP and perianal RMS who received the above-mentioned combination therapy in our department since January 2021. iMRI was used in 12 children. All tubes were clearly localized. No adverse events occurred. In all 12 children, radiotherapy could be started on time. In a historical cohort without iMRI, this was not possible in 3 out of 20 children. The use of iMRI in children with BP and perianal RMS improved patient safety and treatment quality. This technology has proven to be successful for the patient population we have defined and has become a standard procedure in our institution. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Urological Cancer 2023-2025)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 16038 KiB  
Article
Mapping Resection Progress by Tool-Tip Tracking during Brain Tumor Surgery for Real-Time Estimation of Residual Tumor
by Parikshit Juvekar, Erickson Torio, Wenya Linda Bi, Dhiego Chaves De Almeida Bastos, Alexandra J. Golby and Sarah F. Frisken
Cancers 2023, 15(3), 825; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030825 - 29 Jan 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3390
Abstract
Surgical resection continues to be the primary initial therapeutic strategy in the treatment of patients with brain tumors. Computerized cranial neuronavigation based on preoperative imaging offers precision guidance during craniotomy and early tumor resection but progressively loses validity with brain shift. Intraoperative MRI [...] Read more.
Surgical resection continues to be the primary initial therapeutic strategy in the treatment of patients with brain tumors. Computerized cranial neuronavigation based on preoperative imaging offers precision guidance during craniotomy and early tumor resection but progressively loses validity with brain shift. Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) and intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) can update the imaging used for guidance and navigation but are limited in terms of temporal and spatial resolution, respectively. We present a system that uses time-stamped tool-tip positions of surgical instruments to generate a map of resection progress with high spatial and temporal accuracy. We evaluate this system and present results from 80 cranial tumor resections. Regions of the preoperative tumor segmentation that are covered by the resection map (True Positive Tracking) and regions of the preoperative tumor segmentation not covered by the resection map (True Negative Tracking) are determined for each case. We compare True Negative Tracking, which estimates the residual tumor, with the actual residual tumor identified using iMRI. We discuss factors that can cause False Positive Tracking and False Negative Tracking, which underestimate and overestimate the residual tumor, respectively. Our method provides good estimates of the residual tumor when there is minimal brain shift, and line-of-sight is maintained. When these conditions are not met, surgeons report that it is still useful for identifying regions of potential residual. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Precision Image-Guided Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 661 KiB  
Review
Review of Intraoperative Adjuncts for Maximal Safe Resection of Gliomas and Its Impact on Outcomes
by Hani Chanbour and Silky Chotai
Cancers 2022, 14(22), 5705; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225705 - 21 Nov 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3375
Abstract
Maximal safe resection is the mainstay of treatment in the neurosurgical management of gliomas, and preserving functional integrity is linked to favorable outcomes. How these modalities differ in their effectiveness on the extent of resection (EOR), survival, and complications remains unknown. A systematic [...] Read more.
Maximal safe resection is the mainstay of treatment in the neurosurgical management of gliomas, and preserving functional integrity is linked to favorable outcomes. How these modalities differ in their effectiveness on the extent of resection (EOR), survival, and complications remains unknown. A systematic literature search was performed with the following inclusion criteria: published between 2005 and 2022, involving brain glioma surgery, and including one or a combination of intraoperative modalities: intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI), awake/general anesthesia craniotomy mapping (AC/GA), fluorescence-guided imaging, or combined modalities. Of 525 articles, 464 were excluded and 61 articles were included, involving 5221 glioma patients, 7(11.4%) articles used iMRI, 21(36.8%) used cortical mapping, 15(24.5%) used 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) or fluorescein sodium, and 18(29.5%) used combined modalities. The heterogeneity in reporting the amount of surgical resection prevented further analysis. Progression-free survival/overall survival (PFS/OS) were reported in 18/61(29.5%) articles, while complications and permanent disability were reported in 38/61(62.2%) articles. The reviewed studies demonstrate that intraoperative adjuncts such as iMRI, AC/GA mapping, fluorescence-guided imaging, and a combination of these modalities improve EOR. However, PFS/OS were underreported. Combining multiple intraoperative modalities seems to have the highest effect compared to each adjunct alone. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Treatment of Glioma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 14545 KiB  
Review
Fluorescence-Guided Surgery and Novel Innovative Technologies for Improved Visualization in Pediatric Urology
by Irene Paraboschi, Guglielmo Mantica, Dario Guido Minoli, Erika Adalgisa De Marco, Michele Gnech, Carolina Bebi, Gianantonio Manzoni and Alfredo Berrettini
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11194; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811194 - 6 Sep 2022
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 2630
Abstract
Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS), three-dimensional (3D) imaging technologies, and other innovative devices are rapidly revolutionizing the field of urology, providing surgeons with powerful tools for a more complete understanding of patient-specific anatomy. Today, several new intraoperative imaging technologies and cutting-edge devices are available in [...] Read more.
Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS), three-dimensional (3D) imaging technologies, and other innovative devices are rapidly revolutionizing the field of urology, providing surgeons with powerful tools for a more complete understanding of patient-specific anatomy. Today, several new intraoperative imaging technologies and cutting-edge devices are available in adult urology to assist surgeons in delivering personalized interventions. Their applications are also gradually growing in general pediatric surgery, where the detailed visualization of normal and pathological structures has the potential to significantly minimize perioperative complications and improve surgical outcomes. In the field of pediatric urology, FGS, 3D reconstructions and printing technologies, augmented reality (AR) devices, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) have been increasingly adopted for a more realistic understanding of the normal and abnormal anatomy, providing a valuable insight to deliver customized treatments in real time. This narrative review aims to illustrate the main applications of these new technologies and imaging devices in the clinical setting of pediatric urology by selecting, with a strict methodology, the most promising articles published in the international scientific literature on this topic. The purpose is to favor early adoption and stimulate more research on this topic for the benefit of children. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Reproductive Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1473 KiB  
Article
The Benefit of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Endoscopic and Microscopic Transsphenoidal Resection of Recurrent Pituitary Adenomas
by Andrej Pala, Andreas Knoll, Max Schneider, Gwendolin Etzrodt-Walter, Georg Karpel-Massler, Christian Rainer Wirtz and Michal Hlavac
Curr. Oncol. 2022, 29(1), 392-401; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29010035 - 17 Jan 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3389
Abstract
The surgical treatment of recurrent adenomas can be challenging. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) can improve the orientation and increase the safe extent of resection. We conducted a quantitative and qualitative retrospective analysis of recurrent adenomas treated by endoscopic or microscopic iMRI-assisted transsphenoidal [...] Read more.
The surgical treatment of recurrent adenomas can be challenging. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) can improve the orientation and increase the safe extent of resection. We conducted a quantitative and qualitative retrospective analysis of recurrent adenomas treated by endoscopic or microscopic iMRI-assisted transsphenoidal surgery. A total number of 59 resections were selected. Detailed volumetric measurements, tumor characteristics, and MRI features of intraoperative remnants were evaluated. Intraoperative MRI increased the gross total resection (GTR) rate from 33.9% to 49.2%. Common locations of tumor remnants after iMRI were the clivus, the wall of the cavernous sinus or the perforation of the diaphragm. Increasing tumor volume and the microscopic technique were significantly associated with further resection after iMRI in the univariate analysis (p = 0.004, OR 1.6; p = 0.009, OR 4.4). Only the increasing tumor volume was an independent predictor for further resection (p = 0.007, OR 1.5). A significantly higher proportion of GTRs was achieved with the endoscopic technique (p = 0.001). Patients with a large recurrent pituitary adenoma who underwent microscopic transsphenoidal resection were the most likely to benefit from iMRI regarding the extent of resection. Occult invasions of the cavernous sinus and/or the clivus were the most common findings leading to further resection of tumor remnants after iMRI. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advancements in the Surgical Treatment of Brain Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 602 KiB  
Review
Surgically Induced Contrast Enhancements on Intraoperative and Early Postoperative MRI Following High-Grade Glioma Surgery: A Systematic Review
by Alexander Malcolm Rykkje, Dana Li, Jane Skjøth-Rasmussen, Vibeke Andrée Larsen, Michael Bachmann Nielsen, Adam Espe Hansen and Jonathan Frederik Carlsen
Diagnostics 2021, 11(8), 1344; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081344 - 26 Jul 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 2586
Abstract
For the radiological assessment of resection of high-grade gliomas, a 72-h diagnostic window is recommended to limit surgically induced contrast enhancements. However, such enhancements may occur earlier than 72 h post-surgery. This systematic review aimed to assess the evidence on the timing of [...] Read more.
For the radiological assessment of resection of high-grade gliomas, a 72-h diagnostic window is recommended to limit surgically induced contrast enhancements. However, such enhancements may occur earlier than 72 h post-surgery. This systematic review aimed to assess the evidence on the timing of the postsurgical MRI. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane were searched following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only original research articles describing surgically induced contrast enhancements on MRI after resection for high-grade gliomas were included and analysed. The frequency of different contrast enhancement patterns on intraoperative MRI (iMRI) and early postoperative MRI (epMRI) was recorded. The search resulted in 1443 studies after removing duplicates, and a total of 12 studies were chosen for final review. Surgically induced contrast enhancements were reported at all time points after surgery, including on iMRI, but their type and frequency vary. Thin linear contrast enhancements were commonly found to be surgically induced and were less frequently recorded on postoperative days 1 and 2. This suggests that the optimal time to scan may be at or before this time. However, the evidence is limited, and higher-quality studies using larger and consecutively sampled populations are needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 3084 KiB  
Article
The Impact of an Ultra-Early Postoperative MRI on Treatment of Lower Grade Glioma
by Andrej Pala, Gregor Durner, Michael Braun, Bernd Schmitz, Christian Rainer Wirtz and Jan Coburger
Cancers 2021, 13(12), 2914; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13122914 - 10 Jun 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2998
Abstract
The timing of MRI imaging after surgical resection may have an important role in assessing the extent of resection (EoR) and in determining further treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the time dependency of T2 and FLAIR changes after surgery [...] Read more.
The timing of MRI imaging after surgical resection may have an important role in assessing the extent of resection (EoR) and in determining further treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the time dependency of T2 and FLAIR changes after surgery for LGG. The Log-Glio database of patients treated at our hospital from 2016 to 2021 was searched for patients >18a and non-enhancing intra-axial lesion with complete MR-imaging protocol. A total of 16 patients matched the inclusion criteria and were thus selected for volumetric analysis. All patients received an intraoperative scan (iMRI) after complete tumor removal, an ultra-early postoperative scan after skin closure, an early MRI within 48 h and a late follow up MRI after 3–4 mo. Detailed volumetric analysis of FLAIR and T2 abnormalities was conducted. Demographic data and basic characteristics were also analyzed. An ultra-early postoperative MRI was performed within a median time of 30 min after skin closure and showed significantly lower FLAIR (p = 0.003) and T2 (p = 0.003) abnormalities when compared to early postoperative MRI (median 23.5 h), though no significant difference was found between ultra-early and late postoperative FLAIR (p = 0.422) and T2 (p = 0.575) images. A significant difference was calculated between early and late postoperative FLAIR (p = 0.005) and T2 (p = 0.019) MRI scans. Additionally, we found no significant difference between intraoperative and ultra-early FLAIR/T2 (p = 0.919 and 0.499), but we found a significant difference between iMRI and early MRI FLAIR/T2 (p = 0.027 and p = 0.035). Therefore, a postoperative MRI performed 24 h or 48 h might lead to false positive findings. An MRI scan in the first hour after surgery (ultra-early) correlated best with residual tumor at 3 months follow up. An iMRI with open skull, at the end of resection, was similar to an ultra-early MRI with regard to residual tumor. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Perioperative Imaging and Mapping Methods in Glioma Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1893 KiB  
Review
The Neurosurgeon’s Armamentarium for Gliomas: An Update on Intraoperative Technologies to Improve Extent of Resection
by Alexander J. Schupper, Raymund L. Yong and Constantinos G. Hadjipanayis
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(2), 236; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020236 - 11 Jan 2021
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 4839
Abstract
Maximal safe resection is the standard of care in the neurosurgical treatment of high-grade gliomas. To aid surgeons in the operating room, adjuvant techniques and technologies centered around improving intraoperative visualization of tumor tissue have been developed. In this review, we will discuss [...] Read more.
Maximal safe resection is the standard of care in the neurosurgical treatment of high-grade gliomas. To aid surgeons in the operating room, adjuvant techniques and technologies centered around improving intraoperative visualization of tumor tissue have been developed. In this review, we will discuss the most advanced technologies, specifically fluorescence-guided surgery, intraoperative imaging, neuromonitoring modalities, and microscopic imaging techniques. The goal of these technologies is to improve detection of tumor tissue beyond what conventional microsurgery has permitted. We describe the various advances, the current state of the literature that have tested the utility of the different adjuvants in clinical practice, and future directions for improving intraoperative technologies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gliomas: Implication for Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3135 KiB  
Article
Assessment of the Extent of Resection in Surgery of High-Grade Glioma—Evaluation of Black Blood Sequences for Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla
by Tom Finck, Jens Gempt, Sandro M. Krieg, Bernhard Meyer, Claus Zimmer, Benedikt Wiestler, Jan S. Kirschke and Nico Sollmann
Cancers 2020, 12(6), 1580; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061580 - 15 Jun 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2979
Abstract
Achieving an optimal extent of resection (EOR) whilst keeping lasting neurological decline to a minimum is paramount for modern neurosurgery in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG). To improve EOR assessment, this study introduces Black Blood (BB) imaging, which uses a selective saturation pulse [...] Read more.
Achieving an optimal extent of resection (EOR) whilst keeping lasting neurological decline to a minimum is paramount for modern neurosurgery in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG). To improve EOR assessment, this study introduces Black Blood (BB) imaging, which uses a selective saturation pulse to suppress the blood signal, to 3-Tesla intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI). Seventy-three patients (56.4 ± 13.9 years, 64.4% male) with contrast-enhancing HGGs underwent iMRI, including contrast-enhanced (CE) and non-CE 3D turbo field-echo imaging (TFE; acquisition time: 4:20 min per sequence) and CE and non-CE 3D BB imaging (acquisition time: 1:36 min per sequence). Two readers (R1 and R2) retrospectively evaluated the EOR and diagnostic confidence (1—very inconfident to 5—very confident) as well as the delineation of tumor boarders and spread of contrast-enhancing tumor components (in case of contrast-enhancing tumor residuals). Furthermore, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured for contrast-enhancing tumor residuals. Both BB and conventional TFE imaging allowed for the correct detection of all contrast-enhancing tumor residuals intraoperatively (considering postsurgical MRI and histopathological evaluation as the ground truth for determination of the lack/presence of contrast-enhancing tumor residuals), but BB imaging showed significantly higher diagnostic confidence (R1: 4.65 ± 0.53 vs. 3.88 ± 1.02, p < 0.0001; R2: 4.75 ± 0.50 vs. 4.25 ± 0.81, p < 0.0001). Delineation of contrast-enhancing tumor residuals and detection of their spread into adjacent brain parenchyma was better for BB imaging. Accordingly, significantly higher CNRs were noted for BB imaging (48.1 ± 32.1 vs. 24.4 ± 15.3, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, BB imaging is not inferior to conventional TFE imaging for EOR assessment, but may significantly reduce scanning time for iMRI whilst increasing diagnostic confidence. Furthermore, given the better depiction of contrast-enhancing tumor residual spread and borders, BB imaging could support achieving complete macroscopic resection in patients suffering from HGG, which is clinically relevant as an optimal EOR is correlated to prolonged survival. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 197 KiB  
Review
Awake versus Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: Technical Considerations and Critical Review of the Literature
by Ryan B. Kochanski and Sepehr Sani
Brain Sci. 2018, 8(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8010017 - 19 Jan 2018
Cited by 48 | Viewed by 6868
Abstract
Advancements in neuroimaging have led to a trend toward direct, image-based targeting under general anesthesia without the use of microelectrode recording (MER) or intraoperative test stimulation, also referred to as “asleep” deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. Asleep DBS, utilizing imaging in the form [...] Read more.
Advancements in neuroimaging have led to a trend toward direct, image-based targeting under general anesthesia without the use of microelectrode recording (MER) or intraoperative test stimulation, also referred to as “asleep” deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. Asleep DBS, utilizing imaging in the form of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) or magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI), has demonstrated reliable targeting accuracy of DBS leads implanted within the globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus while also improving clinical outcomes in patients with Parkinson’s disease. In lieu, of randomized control trials, retrospective comparisons between asleep and awake DBS with MER have shown similar short-term efficacy with the potential for decreased complications in asleep cohorts. In lieu of long-term outcome data, awake DBS using MER must demonstrate more durable outcomes with fewer stimulation-induced side effects and lead revisions in order for its use to remain justifiable; although patient-specific factors may also be used to guide the decision regarding which technique may be most appropriate and tolerable to the patient. Full article
Back to TopTop