Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (26)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = injectable-platelet rich fibrin (i-PRF)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 280 KB  
Review
Biostimulation-Based Approaches for Gingival Tissue Augmentation in Thin Periodontal Phenotype: Potential Applications for Orthodontic Patients
by Amelia Rusiecka, Natalia Bielecka-Kowalska and Sebastian Kłosek
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(2), 576; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020576 - 11 Jan 2026
Viewed by 272
Abstract
Gingival recession, particularly in patients exhibiting a thin periodontal phenotype, is a prevalent and challenging complication associated with orthodontic treatment, among other factors. Recent advances in biostimulation therapies aim to support soft tissue augmentation by increasing gingival thickness (GT) and keratinized tissue width [...] Read more.
Gingival recession, particularly in patients exhibiting a thin periodontal phenotype, is a prevalent and challenging complication associated with orthodontic treatment, among other factors. Recent advances in biostimulation therapies aim to support soft tissue augmentation by increasing gingival thickness (GT) and keratinized tissue width (KTW) while minimizing the need for invasive surgical procedures. This narrative review explores the available clinical evidence regarding several biostimulation techniques, including injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF), microneedling (MN), concentrated growth factors (CGF), atelocollagen, hyaluronic acid (HA), and low-level laser therapy (LLLT), with a particular focus on their potential adjunctive role in orthodontic patients with a thin periodontal phenotype. While i-PRF and microneedling—used alone or in combination—have shown promising short-term soft tissue thickening and reduced patient morbidity when compared with conventional grafting procedures, the available evidence is largely derived from small, randomized trials, pilot studies, and non-orthodontic cohorts, limiting the strength of comparative conclusions. Minimally invasive biostimulation techniques may represent potential adjunctive strategies for soft tissue management in selected clinical scenarios. Nevertheless, current evidence remains limited and heterogeneous, and robust, long-term, orthodontic-specific clinical trials are required before these approaches can be considered reliable alternatives to established surgical protocols or validated preventive strategies against gingival recession. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine)
22 pages, 2246 KB  
Article
Comparative Evaluation of Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin with and Without Microneedling in Periodontal Regeneration: A Prospective Split-Mouth Clinical Study
by Iulia Muntean, Alexandra Roi, Lavinia Cosmina Ardelean and Laura-Cristina Rusu
Biomedicines 2026, 14(1), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14010135 - 9 Jan 2026
Viewed by 332
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Periodontal disease is a prevalent chronic inflammatory condition that often progresses to irreversible tissue destruction. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a combined minimally invasive periodontal therapeutic protocol scaling and root planing (SRP) with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) and [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Periodontal disease is a prevalent chronic inflammatory condition that often progresses to irreversible tissue destruction. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a combined minimally invasive periodontal therapeutic protocol scaling and root planing (SRP) with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) and microneedling (MN) compared to conventional SRP with i-PRF alone in patients with stage II–III periodontitis. Methods: A prospective split-mouth clinical study was conducted on 54 patients diagnosed according to the 2018 EFP/AAP classification. Each participant received SRP + i-PRF in the upper arch (control) and SRP + i-PRF + MN in the lower arch (test). Periodontal parameters clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing (BOP), and plaque index (PI) were measured at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Data were analyzed using Friedman and Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni correction. Results: Both treatment protocols produced significant longitudinal improvements in CAL, BOP, and PI (p < 0.001). The most pronounced BOP reduction occurred within the first month, while CAL improvement was progressive and stabilized after six months. The Combined protocol achieved slightly greater CAL gain at 6 months (mean difference ≈ 0.46 mm; p = 0.0013), indicating a modest yet statistically significant advantage in attachment recovery. Correlation analyses confirmed a coherent healing trajectory characterized by early inflammation resolution, plaque control, and later tissue stabilization. Conclusions: Both i-PRF-based regenerative approaches significantly improved periodontal parameters. The addition of MN enhanced CAL recovery and may favor early vascularization and collagen remodeling. Although the clinical difference was limited, the biological plausibility and sustained improvement suggest that MN could represent a valuable adjunct to non-surgical regenerative periodontal therapy. Longer-term studies are warranted to assess the durability of these effects. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 3323 KB  
Article
Comparative Outcomes of Delayed i-PRF Combination with Nanofracture in the Treatment of Large Chondral Defects in the Knee
by Özgür Başal, James G. Jefferies, Jure Serdar and Mahmut Nedim Doral
Medicina 2025, 61(10), 1849; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101849 - 15 Oct 2025
Viewed by 562
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether delayed intra-articular application of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) improves clinical and radiologic outcomes compared to nanofracture alone. Materials and Methods: A total of 76 patients with ICRS Grade III–IV femoral condyle or [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether delayed intra-articular application of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) improves clinical and radiologic outcomes compared to nanofracture alone. Materials and Methods: A total of 76 patients with ICRS Grade III–IV femoral condyle or trochlear cartilage defects larger than 2 cm2 were enrolled in this prospective controlled study. Patients were allocated into two groups: Group 1 (n = 40) underwent nanofracture followed by delayed intra-articular i-PRF injection at three weeks postoperatively, while Group 2 (n = 36) underwent nanofracture alone. Preoperative MRI was evaluated using the AMADEUS grading system. Clinical outcomes—including WOMAC and IKDC scores—were assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. MOCART 2.0 scoring was used to evaluate cartilage repair at ≥12 months follow-up. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant functional improvement according to the IKDC and WOMAC scores. However, Group 1 showed a significantly greater improvement in WOMAC total score at final follow-up (Group 1: 20.1 ± 4.3 vs. control: 23.2 ± 3.4; p = 0.0008). No statistically significant differences were found between groups in IKDC score (p = 0.238), Tegner score (p = 0.776), or time to return to daily activities (p = 0.401). Baseline demographic, radiological, and intraoperative variables were comparable between groups (p > 0.05 for all). Radiologic outcomes based on the mean MOCART 2.0 scores were 57.1 and 50, respectively, in group 1 and group 2 (p = 0.0316). These results showed significantly improved results in group 1 according to the MRI evaluation. Conclusions: In patients with large chondral defects (>2 cm2), delayed intra-articular i-PRF injection following nanofracture may improve mid-term functional and radiological outcomes, particularly in pain and symptom relief. This regenerative strategy enhances cartilage repair potential during the early healing phase without adding surgical complexity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1932 KB  
Article
Synergistic Effects of Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Bioactive Peptides on Dermal Fibroblast Viability and Extracellular Matrix Gene Expression: An In Vitro Study
by Ana Giulia Lenci Paccola, Thomas Marcelino Couto dos Santos, Maria Clara Minelo, Thais Francini Garbieri, Mariana Liessa Rovis Sanches, Thiago José Dionísio, Rodrigo Cardoso de Oliveira, Carlos Ferreira Santos and Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf
Molecules 2025, 30(16), 3415; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30163415 - 19 Aug 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2109
Abstract
Facial aging is a multifactorial process involving changes in bone, fat compartments, ligaments, muscles, and skin. Collagen biostimulators, including synthetic agents and autologous platelet concentrates, have gained attention for facial rejuvenation. Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF), a second-generation autologous concentrate, has shown promising regenerative [...] Read more.
Facial aging is a multifactorial process involving changes in bone, fat compartments, ligaments, muscles, and skin. Collagen biostimulators, including synthetic agents and autologous platelet concentrates, have gained attention for facial rejuvenation. Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF), a second-generation autologous concentrate, has shown promising regenerative properties due to its natural composition and growth factors. Cosmetic peptides, such as palmitoyl pentapeptide-4 (Matrixyl) and Tetrapeptide-21 (GEKG), are also studied for their ability to stimulate collagen synthesis and remodel the extracellular matrix. This in vitro study examined the potential synergistic effects of i-PRF combined with Matrixyl or GEKG on human dermal fibroblast viability, proliferation, and ECM-related gene expression. Fibroblasts were cultured under six conditions: control, i-PRF alone, Matrixyl alone, GEKG alone, i-PRF + Matrixyl, and i-PRF + GEKG. Viability and proliferation were assessed via MTT, crystal violet, and RealTime-Glo™ assays. Gene expression of COL1A1, FN1, and HAS1 was measured using RT-qPCR. The combinations, especially i-PRF + GEKG, led to increased cell viability and upregulated ECM-related genes at 72 h. These effects were stronger than the individual treatments, suggesting synergistic effects, especially with GEKG. These findings highlight the clinical potential of combining autologous platelet concentrates with bioactive peptides for dermal regeneration. Further preclinical and clinical studies are warranted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Biology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 434 KB  
Article
The Influence of Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin on the Clinical Parameters and the Levels of MMP-8 in the GCF in Non-Surgical Treatment of Periodontitis—Randomized Trial
by Anna Skurska, Marek Chwiedosik, Anna Justyna Milewska, Robert Milewski, Michał Pawłowski, Jennifer Alberichi, Violetta Dymicka-Piekarska and Martina Stefanini
J. Funct. Biomater. 2025, 16(6), 202; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16060202 - 1 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1588
Abstract
Background: This study evaluates non-surgical therapy combined with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) on the clinical parameters and the levels of matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) in patients with periodontitis. Methods: Forty subjects diagnosed with periodontitis were randomly divided into [...] Read more.
Background: This study evaluates non-surgical therapy combined with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) on the clinical parameters and the levels of matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) in patients with periodontitis. Methods: Forty subjects diagnosed with periodontitis were randomly divided into two groups. In the test group, scaling and root planing (SRP) was performed with the subsequent application of i-PRF into periodontal pockets, while in the control group SRP was performed alone. Clinical examination was performed before and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment. For MMP-8 level determination, the ELISA method was used. Results: In both groups, a statistically significant reduction in full mouth probing depth (FMPD), full mouth clinical attachment level (FMCAL), full mouth bleeding on probing (FMBOP), full mouth plaque index (FMPI) and full mouth marginal bleeding index FMMBI (p < 0.001) was observed. In the test group, the reduction in FMPD and FMBOP was statistically significantly greater than in the control group (p = 0.049 and p < 0.001, respectively). A significantly greater reduction of probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) in pockets > 5 mm between baseline and examination after 3 and 6 months was noted in the test group. The level of MMP-8 was statistically significantly reduced in both groups (p = 0.007 and p = 0.009). Conclusions: SRP significantly improves the clinical parameters and reduces MMP-8 levels in patients with periodontitis. Addition of i-PRF may further enhance the positive effects of periodontal treatment on clinical parameters, without significant influence on MMP-8 levels. The results of the research require confirmation in a more homogeneous group, taking into account the elimination of the specified limitations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dental Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 7466 KB  
Article
Analysis of the Expression and Activity of Cyclooxygenases COX-1 and COX-2 in THP-1 Monocytes and Macrophages Cultured with Xenogenic Collagen Matrices Biofunctionalized with the Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin
by Agnieszka Droździk, Katarzyna Barczak, Mateusz Bosiacki, Patrycja Kupnicka, Diana Cenariu, Willi Andrei Uriciuc, Dariusz Chlubek, Mariusz Lipski, Marek Droździk and Irena Baranowska-Bosiacka
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(9), 4386; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094386 - 5 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2913
Abstract
Xenogenic collagen matrices are used in clinical practice for soft tissue augmentation around teeth and implants, either alone or biofunctionalized with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (iPRF). Their direct interaction with inflammatory cells may influence both healing and destructive inflammation processes. Therefore, expression of cyclooxygenases [...] Read more.
Xenogenic collagen matrices are used in clinical practice for soft tissue augmentation around teeth and implants, either alone or biofunctionalized with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (iPRF). Their direct interaction with inflammatory cells may influence both healing and destructive inflammation processes. Therefore, expression of cyclooxygenases (COX-1 and COX-2) and prostanoids (PGE2 and TXB2) was studied in THP-1 monocyte/macrophage cultures exposed to porcine collagen matrices (a non-cross-linked monolayer scaffold composed of collagen type I, collagen type III, and elastin (MLCM), a bilayer scaffold made of collagen types I and III (BLCM), and a volume-stable cross-linked monolayer scaffold (VSCM)). The study showed that VSCM and MLCM significantly reduced PGE2 concentrations in THP-1 monocyte cultures. iPRF further reduced PGE2 concentrations when exposed to MLCM. In contrast, incubation of THP-1 monocytes with VSCM and BLCM resulted in a significant increase in TXB2 concentrations compared with control conditions. Incubation of macrophages with MLCM, VSCM, and BLCM increased PGE2 concentrations, with VSCM and BLCM additionally increasing TXB2 concentrations. iPRF in macrophage cultures with VSCM and BLCM also resulted in increased PGE2 and TXB2 concentrations compared with control conditions. Confocal microscopy revealed no visible differences in COX-1 immunoexpression in monocytes and macrophages cultured with collagen matrices, either with or without iPFR. Weak positive COX-2 immunofluorescence was observed in monocytes, while moderate positive immunofluorescence was detected in macrophages. In conclusion, it can be suggested that the studied collagen matrices interact with monocytes/macrophages, with MLCM exhibiting the highest compatibility. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeting Collagen-Related Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 471 KB  
Review
The Role of Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Orthopedics: Where Do We Stand?
by Fábio Ramos Costa, Sergio Augusto Lopes de Souza, Rubens Andrade Martins, Bruno Ramos Costa, Luyddy Pires, Alex Pontes de Macedo, Napoliane Santos, Stephany Cares Huber, Gabriel Silva Santos, André Kruel, Márcia Santos and José Fábio Lana
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47(4), 239; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47040239 - 29 Mar 2025
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 5459
Abstract
Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (i-PRF) has emerged as a promising tool in regenerative medicine, particularly in orthopedics, due to its unique biological properties and ease of preparation. i-PRF is an autologous platelet concentrate derived through a simple, anticoagulant-free centrifugation process, resulting in a liquid [...] Read more.
Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (i-PRF) has emerged as a promising tool in regenerative medicine, particularly in orthopedics, due to its unique biological properties and ease of preparation. i-PRF is an autologous platelet concentrate derived through a simple, anticoagulant-free centrifugation process, resulting in a liquid matrix enriched with fibrin, leukocytes, and growth factors. These components promote tissue regeneration, angiogenesis, and anti-inflammatory responses, making i-PRF suitable for bone and cartilage repair as well as drug delivery systems. This review discusses the history, biological mechanisms, and clinical applications of i-PRF in orthopedics, highlighting its potential advantages over traditional platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Furthermore, we address the challenges and limitations of i-PRF, including drug stability, release control, and bioactive interactions, underscoring the need for further research to optimize its therapeutic efficacy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 19739 KB  
Article
A Comparison of the Sticky Bone Obliteration Technique and Obliteration Using S53P4 Bioactive Glass After Canal Wall Down Ear Surgery: A Preliminary Study
by Aleksander Zwierz, Marta Staszak, Matthias Scheich, Krzysztof Domagalski, Stephan Hackenberg and Paweł Burduk
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(5), 1681; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051681 - 1 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1963
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to analyse the results of the mastoid obliteration technique with sticky bone (SB) and compare them with those obtained using bioactive glass S53P4 (BAG). Methods: This prospective preliminary study comprised 28 adults who underwent canal wall [...] Read more.
Background: The aim of this study was to analyse the results of the mastoid obliteration technique with sticky bone (SB) and compare them with those obtained using bioactive glass S53P4 (BAG). Methods: This prospective preliminary study comprised 28 adults who underwent canal wall down (CWD) surgery using two mastoid obliterative techniques: SB (n = 21) or BAG (n = 7). The SB group was treated with the patients’ own bone dust and injectable platelet rich fibrin (IPRF) (n = 13%) or bone dust, IPRF, and additionally allogenic lyophilised demineralised bone (n = 9%). Results: Nine months after the surgery, in the SB group, retroauricular depression was observed in three (14%) patients, temporary retroauricular fistula in one (5%), and a conical and smooth external auditory canal (EAC) was achieved in 15 (71%). Mean EAC capacity was 0.6 mL higher than in the contralateral ear. In the SB group, the tympanic membrane (TM) of nineteen (91%) patients was fully healed, one (5%) had TM perforation, and one (5%) developed a retraction pocket. In the BAG group, retroauricular depression was observed in four (57%) patients, temporary retroauricular fistula was present in one (14%), and a conical and smooth EAC was achieved in five (71%). Mean EAC capacity was 0.3 mL higher than on the opposite side. In the BAG group, we stated six (86%) patients with fully healed TM and one (14%) with a retraction pocket. One cholesteatoma was found in the BAG group and two in SB, (14% vs. 10%). After 9 months, all patients in both groups achieved a dry and self-cleaning cavity. Conclusions: Mastoid obliteration in CWD surgery using SB or BAG allows for reconstruction of the conical shape of the EAC with a volume similar to that of a healthy ear. Both techniques seem to have a minimal risk of complications and result in a dry, self-cleaning cavity. Further studies concerning a larger series of cases are necessary to confirm the findings of this preliminary analysis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in Otitis Media Diagnosis and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4508 KB  
Article
Effect of Patient Age on Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Fibrin Treatments for Skin Density and Thickness: A Single-Center Ultrasound Study
by Lidia Majewska, Jacek Kijowski and Karolina Dorosz
Life 2025, 15(2), 308; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15020308 - 17 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 8246
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to establish a reproducible protocol for obtaining four plasma fractions (autologous platelet-rich plasma (C-PRP, PRP LCC) and platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF, F-PRF)) from a single blood draw and to evaluate their effectiveness in enhancing skin density and thickness in facial [...] Read more.
Objective: This study aimed to establish a reproducible protocol for obtaining four plasma fractions (autologous platelet-rich plasma (C-PRP, PRP LCC) and platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF, F-PRF)) from a single blood draw and to evaluate their effectiveness in enhancing skin density and thickness in facial aesthetic treatments across different age groups. Methodology: Twenty participants aged 30–60 years received three treatments at 4–6 week intervals, with C-PRP, PRP LCC, I-PRF, and F-PRF injections in targeted facial areas. Ultrasound measurements provided an objective method to assess the outcomes, and statistical analysis evaluated the changes in skin density and thickness. A comprehensive literature review contextualized our findings within the broader scientific discourse on PRP and PRF applications in aesthetic medicine. Results: The protocol successfully yielded four distinct plasma fractions from a single blood draw. Ultrasound and statistical analyses demonstrated significant improvements in skin density and thickness, particularly in the lower eyelid area. These improvements were consistent across all the age groups, suggesting that the therapy’s effectiveness is independent of age. The findings also align with previous research, underscoring PRP’s and PRF’s roles in stimulating fibroblast activity, promoting collagen synthesis, and enhancing skin quality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 446 KB  
Systematic Review
Gingival Augmentation Using Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (i-PRF)—A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
by Jacek Żurek, Wojciech Niemczyk, Marzena Dominiak, Stanisław Niemczyk, Rafał Wiench and Dariusz Skaba
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(18), 5591; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185591 - 20 Sep 2024
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3809
Abstract
Background: In recent years, the utilization of blood concentrates in dentistry has become increasingly prevalent. In 2014, the development of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) was achieved. One of the key benefits of i-PRF is its ability to consistently release a range of growth [...] Read more.
Background: In recent years, the utilization of blood concentrates in dentistry has become increasingly prevalent. In 2014, the development of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) was achieved. One of the key benefits of i-PRF is its ability to consistently release a range of growth factors. This review aimed to determine whether i-PRF could be used for gingival augmentation. Methods: The research involved a search of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases using the following search terms: (“microneedling” or “micro needling” or “injectable platelet-rich fibrin” or “i-PRF”) and (“gingival augmentation” or “augmentation” or “attached gingiva” or “attached mucosa” or “soft tissue augmentation” or “KM” or “keratinized mucosa”). Results: Of the 668 results, 8 articles meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the article. The results of the studies analyzed indicated a significant increase in gingival thickness. Furthermore, some articles demonstrated an increase in keratinized tissue width. The augmentation of the gingival thickness with i-PRF yielded no inferior results in comparison to the free gingival graft, which is the current gold standard, resulting in a superior aesthetic outcome and a reduction in postoperative discomfort. Conclusions: This systematic review allowed the authors to conclude that the use of i-PRF or hyaluronic acid may be the first step towards developing a non-surgical method of gingival augmentation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Research of Novel Therapeutic Approaches in Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 662 KB  
Review
Update on Evidence and Directions in Temporomandibular Joint Injection Techniques: A Rapid Review of Primary Research
by Karolina Lubecka, Kamila Chęcińska, Filip Bliźniak, Maciej Chęciński, Natalia Turosz, Iwona Rąpalska, Adam Michcik, Dariusz Chlubek and Maciej Sikora
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(14), 4022; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144022 - 10 Jul 2024
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4813
Abstract
This rapid review summarizes the latest primary research in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) injection treatment. The final literature searches were conducted on 4 January 2024. Selection was performed systematically following predefined eligibility criteria. Randomized control trials concerning the treatment of TMJ disorders with intra-articular [...] Read more.
This rapid review summarizes the latest primary research in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) injection treatment. The final literature searches were conducted on 4 January 2024. Selection was performed systematically following predefined eligibility criteria. Randomized control trials concerning the treatment of TMJ disorders with intra-articular injections were included. Studies on more invasive interventions were excluded. Quality of life, joint pain and range of mandibular mobility were assessed. Ultimately, 12 studies covering a total of 603 patients qualified. They concerned: (1) arthrocentesis (AC) and the administration of, (2) injectable platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF), (3) platelet-rich plasma (PRP), (4) hyaluronic acid (HA), (5) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and (6) hypertonic dextrose (HD) with a local anesthetic. The dominant approach was to perform arthrocentesis before administering the appropriate injection substance (I-PRF, PRP, HA, or NSAID). Two current studies on the intra-articular administration of NSAIDs, specifically tenoxicam and piroxicam, are noteworthy. A mixture of PRP and HA was injected in another two trials. These two innovative approaches may prove to be significant directions for further research on injection treatment of TMJs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 425 KB  
Review
Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (i-PRF) in the Non-Surgical Treatment of Periodontitis—A Systematic Review
by Wojciech Niemczyk, Katarzyna Janik, Jacek Żurek, Dariusz Skaba and Rafał Wiench
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(12), 6319; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126319 - 7 Jun 2024
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 7970
Abstract
The gold standard in the non-surgical treatment of periodontitis is scaling and root planing (SRP). In recent years, the use of autogenous platelet concentrates has spread over many specialties in dentistry and, thus, has also been gaining popularity in periodontal treatment. Its two [...] Read more.
The gold standard in the non-surgical treatment of periodontitis is scaling and root planing (SRP). In recent years, the use of autogenous platelet concentrates has spread over many specialties in dentistry and, thus, has also been gaining popularity in periodontal treatment. Its two main fractions are platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), which, since 2014, can also be used via injection as injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF). The authors conducted a comprehensive systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. It involved searching PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases using the phrases (“Root Planing” OR “Subgingival Curettage” OR “Periodontal Debridement”) AND (“Platelet-Rich Plasma”). Based on the authors’ inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 results were included in the review, out of 1170 total results. The objective of this review was to ascertain the impact of utilizing PRP and i-PRF in SRP. The results revealed that both the incorporation of PRP and i-PRF were found to be significantly associated with are duction in gingival pocket depth and again in clinical attachment level; however, i-PRF demonstrated superiority in improving clinical parameters. Furthermore, i-PRF demonstrated notable bactericidal efficacy against Porphyromonas gingivalis. On the other hand, PRP proved inferior to an Nd:YAG laser in clinical parameter improvement; however, it demonstrated significant efficiency as well. This literature review led the authors to the conclusion that autologous platelet concentrates might be competent agents for improving the therapeutic outcomes of SRP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Soft Tissue Repair and Oral Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1075 KB  
Systematic Review
Does Liquid/Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Help in the Arthrocentesis Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorder Compared to Other Infusion Options? A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials
by Alexander Nemeth, Bruno Vasconcelos Gurgel, Adam Lowenstein, Luiz Juliasse, Rafael S. Siroma, Zoe Zhu, Jamil Awad Shibli and Carlos Fernando Mourão
Bioengineering 2024, 11(3), 247; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11030247 - 2 Mar 2024
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3573
Abstract
Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) are prevalent musculoskeletal conditions involving pain and dysfunction of jaw mobility and function, which have proven difficult to treat satisfactorily. The present study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a liquid platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) infusion during arthrocentesis versus other [...] Read more.
Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) are prevalent musculoskeletal conditions involving pain and dysfunction of jaw mobility and function, which have proven difficult to treat satisfactorily. The present study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a liquid platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) infusion during arthrocentesis versus other options using coadjuvant materials to reduce TMD symptoms. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov for RCTs published before January 2024, comparing i-PRF to any other TMD treatment. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023495364). The searches generated several recent RCTs that compared i-PRF injection combined with arthrocentesis (AC) to AC-only or AC with platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The outcomes analyzed included measures of pain (visual analog scale, VAS), maximum mouth opening, joint sounds, and MRI-verified changes in joint structure. Across the RCTs, the addition of i-PRF injection to AC resulted in significant improvements in pain relief, joint function, mouth opening, and structural changes compared to AC-only or with PRP over follow-up periods ranging from 6 to 12 months. Current clinical evidence favors using i-PRF as an adjunct to AC rather than AC-only or AC with PRP for the treatment of TMDs. The improvements in subjective and objective outcome measures are clinically meaningful. Still, additional high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes and longer follow-ups are required to strengthen the evidence base and better define the role of i-PRF in TMD management guidelines. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Regenerative Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 7876 KB  
Article
Renewed Concept of Mastoid Cavity Obliteration with the Use of Temporoparietal Fascial Flap Injected by Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin after Subtotal Petrosectomy for Cochlear Implant Patients
by Aleksander Zwierz, Krystyna Masna, Paweł Burduk, Stephan Hackenberg and Matthias Scheich
Audiol. Res. 2024, 14(2), 280-292; https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres14020025 - 1 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2855
Abstract
Background: The subtotal petrosectomy procedure may be useful for cochlear implantation in selected patient groups. Although it is highly effective, complications can arise, which may have economic implications for the patient due to the high cost of the device. Therefore, several authors have [...] Read more.
Background: The subtotal petrosectomy procedure may be useful for cochlear implantation in selected patient groups. Although it is highly effective, complications can arise, which may have economic implications for the patient due to the high cost of the device. Therefore, several authors have attempted to identify the most effective concept for obliteration. Methods: We present a pilot descriptive study of application techniques for obliterating cavities after subtotal petrosectomy using a temporoparietal fascial flap (TPFF) modified with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (IPRF+) for three cochlear implant (CI) patients. Results: Our concept preserves important anatomical structures, such as the temporalis muscle, which covers the CI receiver–stimulator. Injection of IPRF+ also increases the available tissue volume for obliteration and enhances its anti-inflammatory and regenerative potential. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, the use of TPFF for filling the cavity has not been adopted for CI with SP and for blind sac closure. Our literature review and our experience with this small group of patients suggest that this procedure, when combined with IPRF+ injections, may reduce the risk of potential infection in the obliterated cavity, particularly when used with CI. This technique is applicable only in cases when the surgeons are convinced that the middle ear cavity is purged of cholesteatoma. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hearing Loss: Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 7124 KB  
Article
Alveolar Bone Preservation Using a Combination of Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite and Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin: A Study in Rats
by Andries Pascawinata, Gusti Revilla, Roni Eka Sahputra and Syukri Arief
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45(7), 5967-5980; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45070377 - 17 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2445
Abstract
Alveolar bone resorption is a post-extraction complication wherein there is a reduction in the dimensions and quality of the alveolar bone. This study aimed to examine the effects of implantation of a combination of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (nHA) and injectable platelet-rich fibrin (IPRF) on [...] Read more.
Alveolar bone resorption is a post-extraction complication wherein there is a reduction in the dimensions and quality of the alveolar bone. This study aimed to examine the effects of implantation of a combination of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (nHA) and injectable platelet-rich fibrin (IPRF) on the expression of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteocalcin (OCN), and new bone formation. A total of 32 male rats had their upper right incisors extracted under general anesthesia and were then divided into a control group, nHA group, IPRF group, and nHA-IPRF group. Decapitation was carried out on day 14 and day 28 in each group and the jaws of each rat were subjected to immunohistochemical and histological analysis. The results showed a decrease in TRAP expression in the nHA-IPRF group compared with the control group on day 14 (p = 0.074) and day 28 (p = 0.017). The study also showed an increase in ALP and OCN in the HA-IPRF group on day 14 and day 28 compared with the control group. New bone formation suggested a significant increase in the nHA-IPRF group compared with the control group on day 14 (p = 0.001) and day 28 (p = 0.001). nHA-IPRF implantation can suppress alveolar bone resorption, which is indicated by decreased TRAP expression, and it can increase bone growth, as indicated by increased expression of ALP, OCN, and new bone formation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop