Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (9)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = ice-jam flood forecasting

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 16666 KiB  
Review
Requirements for the Development and Operation of a Freeze-Up Ice-Jam Flood Forecasting System
by Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt, Robert Briggs, Amir Ali Khan and Thomas Puestow
Water 2024, 16(18), 2648; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182648 - 18 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1239
Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive overview of ice-jam flood forecasting methodologies applicable to rivers during freezing. It emphasizes the importance of understanding river ice processes and fluvial geomorphology for developing a freeze-up ice-jam flood forecasting system. The article showcases a stochastic modelling approach, [...] Read more.
This article provides a comprehensive overview of ice-jam flood forecasting methodologies applicable to rivers during freezing. It emphasizes the importance of understanding river ice processes and fluvial geomorphology for developing a freeze-up ice-jam flood forecasting system. The article showcases a stochastic modelling approach, which involves simulating a deterministic river ice model multiple times with varying parameters and boundary conditions. This approach has been applied to the Exploits River at Badger in Newfoundland, Canada, a river that has experienced several freeze-up ice-jam floods. The forecasting involves two approaches: predicting the extent of the ice cover during river freezing and using an ensemble method to determine backwater flood level elevations. Other examples of current ice-jam flood forecasting systems for the Kokemäenjoki River (Pori, Finland), Saint John River (Edmundston, NB, Canada), and Churchill River (Mud Lake, NL, Canada) that are operational are also presented. The text provides a detailed explanation of the processes involved in river freeze-up and ice-jam formation, as well as the methodologies used for freeze-up ice-jam flood forecasting. Ice-jam flood forecasting systems used for freeze-up were compared to those employed for spring breakup. Spring breakup and freeze-up ice-jam flood forecasting systems differ in their driving factors and methodologies. Spring breakup, driven by snowmelt runoff, typically relies on deterministic and probabilistic approaches to predict peak flows. Freeze-up, driven by cold temperatures, focuses on the complex interactions between atmospheric conditions, river flow, and ice dynamics. Both systems require air temperature forecasts, but snowpack data are more crucial for spring breakup forecasting. To account for uncertainty, both approaches may employ ensemble forecasting techniques, generating multiple forecasts using slightly different initial conditions or model parameters. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the current state-of-the-art in ice-jam flood forecasting systems and to identify gaps and areas for improvement in existing ice-jam flood forecasting approaches, with a focus on enhancing their accuracy, reliability, and decision-making potential. In conclusion, an effective freeze-up ice-jam flood forecasting system requires real-time data collection and analysis, historical data analysis, ice jam modeling, user interface design, alert systems, and integration with other relevant systems. This combination allows operators to better understand ice jam behavior and make informed decisions about potential risks or mitigation measures to protect people and property along rivers. The key findings of this review are as follows: (i) Ice-jam flood forecasting systems are often based on simple, empirical models that rely heavily on historical data and limited real-time monitoring information. (ii) There is a need for more sophisticated modeling techniques that can better capture the complex interactions between ice cover, water levels, and channel geometry. (iii) Combining data from multiple sources such as satellite imagery, ground-based sensors, numerical models, and machine learning algorithms can significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of ice-jam flood forecasts. (iv) Effective decision-support tools are crucial for integrating ice-jam flood forecasts into emergency response and mitigation strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 7046 KiB  
Review
Elements and Processes Required for the Development of a Spring-Breakup Ice-Jam Flood Forecasting System (Churchill River, Atlantic Canada)
by Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt, Robert Briggs, Amir Ali Khan and Thomas Puestow
Water 2024, 16(11), 1557; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16111557 - 29 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1380
Abstract
Spring-breakup ice-jam floods are a major hazard for many rivers in cold regions. They can cause severe damage to infrastructure, property, and ecosystems along riverbanks. To reduce the risk and impact of these events, it is essential to develop reliable and timely forecasting [...] Read more.
Spring-breakup ice-jam floods are a major hazard for many rivers in cold regions. They can cause severe damage to infrastructure, property, and ecosystems along riverbanks. To reduce the risk and impact of these events, it is essential to develop reliable and timely forecasting systems that can provide early warning and guidance for mitigation actions. In this paper, we highlight the elements and processes required for the successful development of a spring-breakup ice-jam flood forecasting system, using the lower Churchill River in Labrador, Canada as a case study. We review the existing forecasting methodologies and systems for spring-breakup ice-jam floods and discuss their strengths and limitations. We then describe the case study of the lower Churchill River, where a large ice-jam flood occurred in May 2017, triggering an independent review and a series of recommendations for improving the flood preparedness and response. We present the main components and features of the forecasting system that was developed for the lower Churchill River, based on the recommendations from the independent review. We also discuss the improvements that were made to the forecasting system, such as parallelization, adaptation, and determination of ice-jam prone areas. Finally, we provide some conclusions and recommendations for future research and development of spring-breakup ice-jam flood forecasting systems, focusing on the requirements for a technical framework that incorporates community engagement and special considerations for regulated rivers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 7130 KiB  
Article
Study on Forecasting Break-Up Date of River Ice in Heilongjiang Province Based on LSTM and CEEMDAN
by Mingyang Liu, Yinan Wang, Zhenxiang Xing, Xinlei Wang and Qiang Fu
Water 2023, 15(3), 496; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15030496 - 26 Jan 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2307
Abstract
In spring, rivers at middle and high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere are prone to ice jams, which threaten the safety of hydraulic structures in rivers. Heilongjiang Province is located on the highest latitude in China, starting at 43°26′ N and reaching 53°33′ [...] Read more.
In spring, rivers at middle and high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere are prone to ice jams, which threaten the safety of hydraulic structures in rivers. Heilongjiang Province is located on the highest latitude in China, starting at 43°26′ N and reaching 53°33′ N. Rivers in Heilongjiang Province freeze in winter and break up in spring. Forecasting the break-up date of river ice accurately can provide an important reference for the command, dispatch, and decision-making of ice flood preventing and shipping. Based on the observed break-up date series of river ice from seven representative hydrological stations in Heilongjiang Province, the complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN) was used to decompose the observed break-up date series of river ice into several subsequences, and the long-short term memory neural network (LSTM) was used to forecast the subsequences decomposed by CEEDMAN. Then, the forecast results of each subsequence were summed to obtain the forecasting value for the break-up date of river ice proceeded by CEEMDAN-LSTM. Compared with the LSTM, the forecast accuracy of CEEMDAN-LSTM for the break-up date of river ice had been significantly improved, with the mean absolute error reduced from 0.80–6.40 to 0.75–3.40, the qualification rate increased from 60–100% to 80–100%, the root-mean-square difference reduced from 1.37–5.97 to 0.95–1.69, the correlation coefficient increased from 0.51–0.97 to 0.97–0.98, and the Taylor skill score increased from 0.87–0.99 to 0.99. CEEMDAN-LSTM performed well in forecasting the break-up date of river ice in the Heilongjiang Province, which can provide important information for command, dispatch, and decision-making of ice flood control. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Using Artificial Intelligence for Smart Water Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 11776 KiB  
Commentary
Assessing and Mitigating Ice-Jam Flood Hazards and Risks: A European Perspective
by Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt, Knut Alfredsen, Dirk Carstensen, Adam Choryński, David Gustafsson, Michał Halicki, Bernd Hentschel, Niina Karjalainen, Michael Kögel, Tomasz Kolerski, Marika Kornaś-Dynia, Michał Kubicki, Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz, Cornelia Lauschke, Albert Malinger, Włodzimierz Marszelewski, Fabian Möldner, Barbro Näslund-Landenmark, Tomasz Niedzielski, Antti Parjanne, Bogusław Pawłowski, Iwona Pińskwar, Joanna Remisz, Maik Renner, Michael Roers, Maksymilian Rybacki, Ewelina Szałkiewicz, Michał Szydłowski, Grzegorz Walusiak, Matylda Witek, Mateusz Zagata and Maciej Zdralewiczadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Water 2023, 15(1), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010076 - 26 Dec 2022
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 5164
Abstract
The assessment and mapping of riverine flood hazards and risks is recognized by many countries as an important tool for characterizing floods and developing flood management plans. Often, however, these management plans give attention primarily to open-water floods, with ice-jam floods being mostly [...] Read more.
The assessment and mapping of riverine flood hazards and risks is recognized by many countries as an important tool for characterizing floods and developing flood management plans. Often, however, these management plans give attention primarily to open-water floods, with ice-jam floods being mostly an afterthought once these plans have been drafted. In some Nordic regions, ice-jam floods can be more severe than open-water floods, with floodwater levels of ice-jam floods often exceeding levels of open-water floods for the same return periods. Hence, it is imperative that flooding due to river ice processes be considered in flood management plans. This also pertains to European member states who are required to submit renewed flood management plans every six years to the European governance authorities. On 19 and 20 October 2022, a workshop entitled “Assessing and mitigating ice-jam flood hazard and risk” was hosted in Poznań, Poland to explore the necessity of incorporating ice-jam flood hazard and risk assessments in the European Union’s Flood Directive. The presentations given at the workshop provided a good overview of flood risk assessments in Europe and how they may change due to the climate in the future. Perspectives from Norway, Sweden, Finland, Germany, and Poland were presented. Mitigation measures, particularly the artificial breakage of river ice covers and ice-jam flood forecasting, were shared. Advances in ice processes were also presented at the workshop, including state-of-the-art developments in tracking ice-floe velocities using particle tracking velocimetry, characterizing hanging dam ice, designing new ice-control structures, detecting, and monitoring river ice covers using composite imagery from both radar and optical satellite sensors, and calculating ice-jam flood hazards using a stochastic modelling approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surface Water Quality Modelling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 34027 KiB  
Article
Short-Term River Flood Forecasting Using Composite Models and Automated Machine Learning: The Case Study of Lena River
by Mikhail Sarafanov, Yulia Borisova, Mikhail Maslyaev, Ilia Revin, Gleb Maximov and Nikolay O. Nikitin
Water 2021, 13(24), 3482; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13243482 - 7 Dec 2021
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 6466
Abstract
The paper presents a hybrid approach for short-term river flood forecasting. It is based on multi-modal data fusion from different sources (weather stations, water height sensors, remote sensing data). To improve the forecasting efficiency, the machine learning methods and the Snowmelt-Runoff physical model [...] Read more.
The paper presents a hybrid approach for short-term river flood forecasting. It is based on multi-modal data fusion from different sources (weather stations, water height sensors, remote sensing data). To improve the forecasting efficiency, the machine learning methods and the Snowmelt-Runoff physical model are combined in a composite modeling pipeline using automated machine learning techniques. The novelty of the study is based on the application of automated machine learning to identify the individual blocks of a composite pipeline without involving an expert. It makes it possible to adapt the approach to various river basins and different types of floods. Lena River basin was used as a case study since its modeling during spring high water is complicated by the high probability of ice-jam flooding events. Experimental comparison with the existing methods confirms that the proposed approach reduces the error at each analyzed level gauging station. The value of Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient for the ten stations chosen for comparison is 0.80. The other approaches based on statistical and physical models could not surpass the threshold of 0.74. Validation for a high-water period also confirms that a composite pipeline designed using automated machine learning is much more efficient than stand-alone models. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 10525 KiB  
Letter
Mapping, Monitoring, and Prediction of Floods Due to Ice Jam and Snowmelt with Operational Weather Satellites
by Mitchell D. Goldberg, Sanmei Li, Daniel T. Lindsey, William Sjoberg, Lihang Zhou and Donglian Sun
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(11), 1865; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111865 - 9 Jun 2020
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4580
Abstract
Among all the natural hazards throughout the world, floods occur most frequently. They occur in high latitude regions, such as: 82% of the area of North America; most of Russia; Norway, Finland, and Sweden in North Europe; China and Japan in Asia. River [...] Read more.
Among all the natural hazards throughout the world, floods occur most frequently. They occur in high latitude regions, such as: 82% of the area of North America; most of Russia; Norway, Finland, and Sweden in North Europe; China and Japan in Asia. River flooding due to ice jams may happen during the spring breakup season. The Northeast and North Central region, and some areas of the western United States, are especially harmed by floods due to ice jams and snowmelt. In this study, observations from operational satellites are used to map and monitor floods due to ice jams and snowmelt. For a coarse-to-moderate resolution sensor on board the operational satellites, like the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) on board the National Polar-orbiting Partnership (NPP) and the Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) series, and the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) on board the GOES-R series, a pixel is usually composed of a mix of water and land. Water fraction can provide more information and can be estimated through mixed-pixel decomposition. The flood map can be derived from the water fraction difference after and before flooding. In high latitude areas, while conventional observations are usually sparse, multiple observations can be available from polar-orbiting satellites during a single day, and river forecasters can observe ice movement, snowmelt status and flood water evolution from satellite-based flood maps, which is very helpful in ice jam determination and flood prediction. The high temporal resolution of geostationary satellite imagery, like that of the ABI, can provide the greatest extent of flood signals, and multi-day composite flood products from higher spatial resolution imagery, such as VIIRS, can pinpoint areas of interest to uncover more details. One unique feature of our JPSS and GOES-R flood products is that they include not only normal flood type, but also a special flood type as the supra-snow/ice flood, and moreover, snow and ice masks. Following the demonstrations in this study, it is expected that the JPSS and GOES-R flood products, with ice and snow information, can allow dynamic monitoring and prediction of floods due to ice jams and snowmelt for wide-end users. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Natural Hazards)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 5354 KiB  
Technical Note
Radar Scatter Decomposition to Differentiate between Running Ice Accumulations and Intact Ice Covers along Rivers
by Karl–Erich Lindenschmidt and Zhaoqin Li
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(3), 307; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030307 - 3 Feb 2019
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 4343
Abstract
For ice-jam flood forecasting it is important to differentiate between intact ice covers and ice runs. Ice runs consist of long accumulations of rubble ice that stem from broken up ice covers or ice-jams that have released. A water wave generally travels ahead [...] Read more.
For ice-jam flood forecasting it is important to differentiate between intact ice covers and ice runs. Ice runs consist of long accumulations of rubble ice that stem from broken up ice covers or ice-jams that have released. A water wave generally travels ahead of the ice run at a faster celerity, arriving at the potentially high flood–risk area much sooner than the ice accumulation. Hence, a rapid detection of the ice run is necessary to lengthen response times for flood mitigation. Intact ice covers are stationary and hence are not an immediate threat to a downstream flood situation, allowing more time for flood preparedness. However, once ice accumulations are moving and potentially pose imminent impacts to flooding, flood response may have to switch from a mitigation to an evacuation mode of the flood management plan. Ice runs are generally observed, often by chance, through ground observations or airborne surveys. In this technical note, we introduce a novel method of differentiating ice runs from intact ice covers using imagery acquired from space-borne radar backscatter signals. The signals are decomposed into different scatter components—surface scattering, volume scattering and double-bounce—the ratios of one to another allow differentiation between intact and running ice. The method is demonstrated for the breakup season of spring 2018 along the Athabasca River, when an ice run shoved into an intact ice cover which led to some flooding in Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Environmental Changes in Cold Regions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 8296 KiB  
Commentary
Development of an Ice Jam Flood Forecasting System for the Lower Oder River—Requirements for Real-Time Predictions of Water, Ice and Sediment Transport
by Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt, Dirk Carstensen, Wolfgang Fröhlich, Bernd Hentschel, Stefan Iwicki, Michael Kögel, Michał Kubicki, Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz, Cornelia Lauschke, Adam Łazarów, Helena Łoś, Włodzimierz Marszelewski, Tomasz Niedzielski, Marcin Nowak, Bogusław Pawłowski, Michael Roers, Stefan Schlaffer and Beata Weintrit
Water 2019, 11(1), 95; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010095 - 8 Jan 2019
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 8576
Abstract
Despite ubiquitous warming, the lower Oder River typically freezes over almost every year. Ice jams may occur during freeze-up and ice cover breakup phases, particularly in the middle and lower reaches of the river, with weirs and piers. The slush ice and ice [...] Read more.
Despite ubiquitous warming, the lower Oder River typically freezes over almost every year. Ice jams may occur during freeze-up and ice cover breakup phases, particularly in the middle and lower reaches of the river, with weirs and piers. The slush ice and ice blocks may accumulate to form ice jams, leading to backwater effects and substantial water level rise. The small bottom slope of the lower Oder and the tidal backflow from the Baltic Sea enhance the formation of ice jams during cold weather conditions, jeopardizing the dikes. Therefore, development of an ice jam flood forecasting system for the Oder River is much needed. This commentary presents selected results from an international workshop that took place in Wrocław (Poland) on 26–27 November 2018 that brought together an international team of experts to explore the requirements and research opportunities in the field of ice jam flood forecasting and risk assessment for the Oder River section along the German–Polish border. The workshop launched a platform for collaboration amongst Canadian, German and Polish scientists, government officials and water managers to pave a way forward for joint research focused on achieving the long-term goal of forecasting, assessing and mitigating ice jam impacts along the lower Oder. German and Polish government agencies are in need of new tools to forecast ice jams and assess their subsequent consequences and risks to communities and ship navigation along a river. Addressing these issues will also help research and ice flood management in a Canadian context. A research program would aim to develop a modelling system by addressing fundamental issues that impede the prediction of ice jam events and their consequences in cold regions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 4080 KiB  
Article
Time Series Regression for Forecasting Flood Events in Schenectady, New York
by Thomas A. Plitnick, Antonios E. Marsellos and Katerina G. Tsakiri
Geosciences 2018, 8(9), 317; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8090317 - 24 Aug 2018
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 5162
Abstract
Floods typically occur due to ice jams in the winter or extended periods of precipitation in the spring and summer seasons. An increase in the rate of water discharge in the river coincides with a flood event. This research combines the time series [...] Read more.
Floods typically occur due to ice jams in the winter or extended periods of precipitation in the spring and summer seasons. An increase in the rate of water discharge in the river coincides with a flood event. This research combines the time series decomposition and the time series regression model for the flood prediction in Mohawk River at Schenectady, New York. The time series decomposition has been applied to separate the different frequencies in hydrogeological and climatic data. The time series data have been decomposed into the long-term, seasonal-term, and short-term components using the Kolmogorov-Zurbenko filter. For the application of the time series regression model, we determine the lags of the hydrogeological and climatic variables that provide the maximum performance for the model. The lags applied in the predictor variables of the model have been used for the physical interpretation of the model to strengthen the relationship between the water discharge and the climatic and hydrogeological variables. The overall model accuracy has been increased up to 73%. The results show that using the lags of the variables in the time regression model, and the forecasting accuracy has been increased compared to the raw data by two times. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Hazards)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop