Search Results (62)

Human societies depend on prestige hierarchies that confer status on demonstrated competence, alongside the dominance hierarchies that rely on coercion and that humans share with other primates. The same neural processes that support cooperative learning under prestige are hypothesized to participate in rivalry, polarization, and ideological hostility when their operating environments depart from those in which they evolved. This selective narrative review proposes a candidate integrative framework, the Hypothesized Neural Integration Model of Prestige and Pride, drawing on converging but largely indirect evidence from affective neuroscience, neuroeconomics, evolutionary psychology, and social neuroscience. The framework groups five categories of functionally pluripotent processing, each understood as engaging nodes within overlapping large-scale brain networks rather than as a localized regional mechanism: valuation-related processing implicating orbitofrontal and ventromedial prefrontal cortex, reward-learning signals indexed in the ventral striatum, self-referential and identity-relevant processing engaging medial prefrontal cortex within the default-mode network, threat- and salience-related processing involving the amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex within the salience network, and neuroendocrine output regulated through the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and modulated by gonadal and neuropeptide systems. Consistent with Poldrack on reverse inference and with Marr on levels of analysis, the framework is presented at an integrative implementational level with candidate algorithmic mappings specified for each category, not as a computational specification of the constructs themselves, and treats high-level constructs such as prestige, status, and sacred value as emergent phenomena arising from dynamic network interactions, bodily states, cultural contexts, and historical contingencies rather than as properties localized to single regions. Because few neuroimaging paradigms isolate freely conferred deference from generic social rank, claims specific to prestige are deliberately restricted throughout, and the evidence base is presented as one concerning social rank unless a paradigm operationalizes prestige directly. Material ownership, sacred values, religious belief, and digital prestige metrics are treated as candidate domains of application, with explicit separation of direct neural evidence, behavioral evidence, and theoretical extrapolation. Symbolic escalation in consumer markets, sacred-value absolutism, and amplified social feedback on digital platforms are interpreted as candidate environmental amplifiers of ancestral status mechanisms rather than demonstrated causal pathways. Nine operational study designs are proposed to guide future preregistered tests, including one designed to establish whether a prestige-specific neural claim can be made at all. Intervention strategies are mapped to candidate processing and network targets using an explicit evidence-grading scheme, with structural and institutional measures weighted equally alongside cognitive and contemplative ones. The framework relies on correlational neuroimaging subject to reverse-inference constraints, draws primarily from samples from Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic populations, and should be evaluated as a hypothesis-generating account rather than as a confirmed neural architecture. Full article

We present a review on the application of the mathematical models for research on social processes, social structures, and actors in social systems. The scope of the review is not restricted to the classical applications of mathematics such as theory of probability, statistics, stochastic processes, differential equations, and game theory. We also discuss applications of the theory of networks for social network analysis and the numerical research on dynamics of social systems. The number of these applications has increased very fast in recent years. Special attention is given to the results from the area of sociophysics, where mathematical methodology is used to analyze social systems in cooperation with the models and concepts of physics. Another special topic in his review is connected to the results from econophysics, where the mathematical methodology and theories and methods of physics are used in the studies on the dynamics of economic systems. In addition, we give several examples for the application of mathematical methods to social systems: (a) application of difference equations to model the flow of substances in channels of networks; (b) analytical solution of nonlinear equations connected to the model of waves of popularity; (c) numerical results of the waves of popularity in a model that accounts for the change in the opinion of the supporters of the ideas for positive or negative popularity of a person, material item, or a piece of information (idea, theory, ideology, etc.) In the last case, we illustrate the effectiveness of the numerical analysis to discover new effects on the studied social system. The review ends with a large list of references. These references can be used as a guide of the way of new researchers to the large field of mathematical social dynamics. Full article

This paper argues that English translations of the Qur’ān play a pivotal role in shaping interfaith dialogue, either fostering mutual understanding or reinforcing religious division, depending on the translator’s ideological stance. While interreligious relations have historically been marred by conflict, the 1893 Parliament of the World’s Religions marked a turning point toward more inclusive and dialogical engagement. In this context, translating the Qur’ān emerged as a crucial medium through which Islamic teachings could be made accessible to non-Muslim audiences. Several scholars, including Kidwai and Elmarsafy, have explored the Orientalist framing of Qur’ān translation; however, few researchers have examined how modern renderings consciously reposition the text as a site of interfaith ethics. This study critically examines whether George Sale’s influential translation of the Qur’ān—reprinted nearly 200 times—contributes to or hinders interfaith dialogue between Muslims and Christians. It compares Sale’s Qur’ān rendition into English with five contemporary translations. The paper analyzes the translations of five Qur’ānic verses promoting coexistence, with particular attention to key terms such as إِكْرَاهَ ikrah (compulsion), الدِّينِ ad-dīn (religion), تَّقْوَىٰ taqwā (piety), and مُسْلِمُونَ muslimūn (submitters). Guided by Munday’s theory of ideology in translation, the analysis demonstrates that Sale’s rendering adopts a distinctly polemical tone intended to assert Christian superiority. The findings indicate a clear shift from polemical to dialogical translation strategies. Sale’s Orientalist approach—evident in his footnote on Q.4:157, where he characterizes Muslim exegesis as intellectually deficient—ultimately constrains meaningful interfaith engagement. In contrast, Khattab employs an inclusive and ethically grounded approach that actively fosters interreligious dialogue. By positioning Qur’ān translation at the intersection of theology, linguistics, and interfaith relations, this paper demonstrates that translation choices hold significant power: they can either bridge divides or exacerbate tensions between religious communities. Full article

This study investigates how the title of Ghassan Kenefânî’s Umm Saʿd functions as a conduit for the novel’s religious symbolism. It addresses the question of whether a literary title can symbolically mirror the sacred imagery embedded within a narrative. In Umm Saʿd, the main and subordinate titles form a meaningful intersection where the sacred, the resilience of struggle, and the preservation of identity converge. Through a semiotic approach, the study argues that the title surpasses its nominal role and operates as a multilayered sign that conveys the narrative’s ideological and thematic depth. Employing Saussure’s dyadic and Peirce’s triadic sign models, the analysis demonstrates how the title reveals the spiritual codes and sacred motifs woven into the text. The findings indicate that the title not only encapsulates the thematic core of the novel but also guides readers toward its social, cultural and religious dimensions. By remaining detached from political framings, the study underscores how the title brings together the worldly and the sacred within a unified interpretive space. Ultimately, this research uncovers the hidden religious layers of Umm Saʿd, offering an original perspective on the role of titles in mediating and transmitting religious themes in twentieth- and twenty-first-century fictional narratives. Full article

This article explores how ideologies and discourses of school safety and policing operate within the U.S. educational system and shape broader understandings of safety, punishment, and mass incarceration. Guided by corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS) and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), it examines three questions: how different educational community members define safety (and for whom), how policing is constructed as safe or unsafe, and how these narratives position certain students as threats. Analyzing school board meetings, online public comments, and conversations with students within the context of a 2020 local decision to remove School Resource Officers from Eugene, Oregon, public schools, the study identifies common and contested discursive strategies about policing and youth across social and historical contexts. A central finding is the role of adultism in sustaining links between schools and prisons, normalizing compliance, silence, and the disappearance of youth who challenge adult authority. These adultist discourses position students as belonging to adults and construct dissent as danger, enabling surveillance, policing, and incarceration to circulate as commonsense approaches to “community safety.” From these findings, the article introduces YouthCrit as an emergent conceptual framework grounded in youth analyses of adultism. In turn, YouthCrit offers a framework for scholars, educators, and practitioners to challenge deficit narratives about students while centering youth presence and perspectives in school-based research and within social movements for community safety. Full article

This article examines Daniel 10 as a key witness to the formation of early Jewish apocalyptic literature. The chapter portrays Daniel as a sage whose encounter with a celestial messenger prepares him to guide his community. Narratively, this scene introduces the final revelation of Daniel 11–12; ideologically, it expresses the authors’ conviction that access to the heavenly realm is achieved through scribal discipline and engagement with inherited traditions. The study advances two related contributions. Drawing on recent reassessments of apocalyptic origins—especially insights from Aramaic texts at Qumran—the study offers a new analysis of intertextuality in Daniel 10, highlighting how apocalyptic writing predates the persecutions of Antiochus IV and is developed through the reinterpretation of authoritative Scriptures in the Persian and Hellenistic periods. Daniel’s profile aligns with elite temple-based scribes who operated across imperial and cultic settings and used apocalyptic discourse in intra-Judean power struggles. In addition, the reference to the Tigris in Dan 10:4 is reinterpreted in light of Seleucia-on-Tigris, whose culturally hybrid environment illuminates the cosmopolitan backdrop of the maśkîlîm traditions. Full article

This article examines the relationship between jihād and the protection of non-Muslim places of worship in early Islam. Drawing primarily on Qurʾānic verses 22:39–41 and the Covenants of the Prophet, it employs a synchronically comparative framework that analyzes a broad corpus of textual sources, seeking to reconstruct how the early Muslim worldview understood the justification for jihād. It also examines the norms governing conduct after conflict, particularly in relation to treaty-making. The article attempts to make sense of Q22:39–41 within the broader landscape of late antiquity, which was marked by religious persecution and the destruction of sanctuaries under Byzantine and Sasanian rule. The study highlights how clear rules of engagement were articulated in early Islam, including limits on violence and the consequences of treaty violation. It argues that the motivations behind the early conquests cannot be reduced to material interests but rather were guided by a theological and ideological vision linking conquest with the establishment of a just peace, one grounded in the protection of communities, faith, and places of worship through a covenantal paradigm. Full article

Currently, the debate over whether the State’s relationship with religion should be regulated by common law or special law is being reconsidered in somewhat different terms. On the one hand, regardless of the State–religion relationship models divided into virtually watertight categories. On the other hand, this shift is driven by two key elements that blur the boundaries of the debate. Firstly, by the recent jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which gives greater relevance to the principle of cooperation. This cooperation must be understood in light of the State’s duty of neutrality and the effective application of the principle of equality and non-discrimination of religious groups. Secondly, by the importance the European Union attaches to establishing an open, transparent, and regular dialogue with religious and philosophical organizations. In any case, the fact that cooperation is gaining relevance as a principle that must guide the actions of public authorities at the national level necessitates an analysis of the most adequate strategies to understand how these relations are implemented and evaluate the concrete consequences on the guarantee and effective exercise of religious and ideological freedom. Full article

Intensive mothering is a widespread cultural ideology positioning mothers as uniquely responsible for their children’s optimal development through emotionally and cognitively intensive caregiving. A key belief within this framework is maternal essentialism, which asserts that mothers are biologically and morally best suited for parenting young children. Guided by the Family Stress–Proximal Process (FSPP) model, this study examined whether maternal essentialist beliefs act as distal sociocultural stressors influencing children’s executive functioning indirectly through parenting stress and positive parenting behaviors. Data were collected via self-report from 255 U.S. mothers of 3- to 5-year-old children. Path analyses showed that stronger maternal essentialism was associated with increased parenting stress, which predicted lower engagement in positive parenting and greater reported difficulties in children’s executive functioning. The indirect effect of maternal essentialism on children’s executive functioning was statistically significant. These findings suggest that internalized cultural ideologies, often viewed as aspirational, may inadvertently increase parenting stress and reduce caregiving quality, which is associated with diminished child cognitive outcomes. This study extends prior research by linking maternal essentialist beliefs to child developmental outcomes through specified psychological and relational processes, supporting the usefulness of the FSPP framework in understanding how sociocultural pressures influence family dynamics and child development. Full article

This article critiques penal philosophy and practice in contemporary society through the lens of historical–ecclesial tradition. The article opens with a discussion of the penitential rituals in the first Christian monasteries and the eventual adoption of some of these rituals in the earliest state penitentiaries in the U.S. It is argued that a nonviolent and coherent penal ideology was advocated from the inception of Christian monasticism and subsequently maintained over the centuries due to three paradigmatic values and commitments. These values and commitments, which form the basis of the critique, are a theological metanarrative, a moral ontology, and a belief in sin as an existential fact. These tenets are used to interrogate the traditional justifications of punishment that have guided government policy throughout modern history, in the U.S. and abroad. Full article

This article investigates the (im)possibilities of Peace Education as a critical pedagogical practice in contexts marked by liberal ideologies. The question that guides the text is: has Peace Education ‘gone out of style’ in times marked by wars, democratic crises, deepening social inequalities, and the rise of authoritarian discourses? Based on a literature review, the study points out chronological advances and setbacks, highlighting the role of international organizations, such as the UN and UNESCO, in the affirmation, boom, and subsequent decline of the theme. The study also examines educational scenarios in Brazil and Portugal, highlighting their convergences and specificities. It emphasizes, however, that despite liberal pressures, Peace Education, even if not properly named, remains essential for the formation of autonomous and critical individuals, committed to questioning and confronting structural and cultural inequalities, and defending social justice, human rights, and historical memory. Full article

The systematic attacks against the civilian population in Gaza, including educational institutions, constitute war crimes that violate the right to education and affect not only children but also an entire culture’s ability to recover post-conflict and maintain its identity. This document review analysed the reports issued by Nations agencies to identify the types of violence that occur in educational contexts, the victims of such violence, the impact on the rights to and within education, and the educational measures implemented in response. A thematic analysis guided by Karma Nabulsi’s concept of “scholasticide”, Rita Segato’s “pedagogy of cruelty”, and Sara Ahmed’s “witness” was conducted. The findings reveal that the attacks on educational spaces can be interpreted as ideological strategies against the Palestinian culture due to their critical role in cultural resilience and the recovery of the Palestinian people. The reports highlight significant limitations in recognising education as a priority dimension within the framework of international humanitarian aid. Finally, the analysed documents show that children in Gaza experience feelings of abandonment based on the inaction of the international community to guarantee their right to be free from all kinds of violence. Full article

The rise of algorithm-driven virtual museums presents a philosophical challenge for how cultural meaning is constructed and critiqued in digital curation. Prevailing approaches highlight important but partial aspects: the loss of aura and authenticity in digital reproductions, efforts to maintain semiotic continuity with physical exhibits, optimistic narratives of technological democratisation, and critical technopessimist warnings about commodification and bias. Yet none provides a unified theoretical model of meaning-making under algorithmic curation. This paper proposes a dialectical-semiotic framework to synthesise and transcend these positions. The Dialectical Modelling Nexus (DMN) is a new conceptual structure that views meaning in virtual museums as emerging from the dynamic interplay of original and reproduced contexts, human and algorithmic sign systems, personal interpretation, and ideological framing. Through a critique of prior theories and a synthesis of their insights, the DMN offers a comprehensive model to diagnose how algorithms mediate museum content and to guide critical curatorial practice. The framework illuminates the dialectical tensions at the heart of algorithmic cultural mediation and suggests principles for preserving authentic, multi-layered meaning in the digital museum milieu. Full article

Background/Objectives: This paper introduces a pedagogically grounded framework for transforming canonical literary texts in primary education through generative AI. Guided by multiliteracies theory, Vygotskian pedagogy, and epistemic justice, the system aims to enhance interpretive literacy, developmental alignment, and cultural responsiveness among learners aged 7–12. Methods: The proposed system enables educators to perform age-specific text simplification, visual re-narration, lexical reinvention, and multilingual augmentation through a suite of modular tools. Central to the design is the Ethical–Pedagogical Validation Layer (EPVL), a GPT-powered auditing module that evaluates AI-generated content across four normative dimensions: developmental appropriateness, cultural sensitivity, semantic fidelity, and ethical transparency. Results: The framework was fully implemented and piloted with primary educators (N = 8). The pilot demonstrated high usability, curricular alignment, and perceived value for classroom application. Unlike commercial Large Language Models (LLMs), the system requires no prompt engineering and supports editable, policy-aligned controls for normative localization. Conclusions: By embedding ethical evaluation within the generative loop, the framework fosters calibrated trust in human–AI collaboration and mitigates cultural stereotyping and ideological distortion. It advances a scalable, inclusive model for educator-centered AI integration, offering a new pathway for explainable and developmentally appropriate AI use in literary education. Full article

Contemporary scientific consensus recognizes forests as vital to the global carbon cycle and essential for mitigating climate change and biodiversity loss. Several internationally coordinated forest conservation initiatives were established in the late twentieth century. Market- and rights-based strategies and community-driven participatory reforms have evolved in the fortress forests of the Global South. However, there remains a gap in understanding how these overlapping conservation ideologies—particularly neoliberal, participatory, and fortress conservation—have evolved and interacted within specific geographies. This study investigates the nexus of three conservation ideologies in Myanmar since the 1990s. Using a Marxist materialism perspective and poststructuralist political ecology, we explore how power dynamics in forestry are shifting under neoliberal political philosophy. We show how hegemonic neoliberalism influences the roles of state and non-state actors in Myanmar, where new governance approaches to forest conservation have emerged. New ways of governing forest conservation have emerged in Myanmar, where numerous conservation philosophies have guided the state through global programs, leading to skeletal forest conservation governance. However, these approaches have downplayed Myanmar’s historical and geographical characteristics, both of which are progenitors of its problems in forestry. Our study critiques the contrasting tenets of forest conservation theories to inform future policies. Full article