Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (9)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = flux-coupled SFCL

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 7358 KiB  
Article
Quenched Flux-Coupling Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Scheme and Its Electromagnetic Design Method
by Sinian Yan, Li Ren, Jinghong Zhao, Ying Xu, Shifeng Shen, Yiyong Xiong, Baolong Liu and Feiran Xiao
Materials 2023, 16(2), 754; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020754 - 12 Jan 2023
Viewed by 1984
Abstract
In order to solve the problem of excessive short-circuit current in the present power system, a fault current limiter has become a new type of power device with high demand and is one of the current research hotspots. The flux-coupling type superconducting fault [...] Read more.
In order to solve the problem of excessive short-circuit current in the present power system, a fault current limiter has become a new type of power device with high demand and is one of the current research hotspots. The flux-coupling type superconducting fault current limiter (FC-SFCL) generates a current-limiting impedance through decoupling superconducting parallel inductance based on the circuit breakers’ fractional interruption. The principle is simple, and the impedance is low during normal operation. It can directly use the existing circuit breaker to open a short circuit that is much higher than its own breaking capacity. Thus, it can be used for large-capacity fault current limiting and effective failure breaking. This paper focused on exploring and studying the implementation scheme of practical products of FC-SFCL. Considering that the quenched-type parallel inductance can limit the first peak value of the fault current, a quenched-type improvement scheme was proposed. Then, an electromagnetic design method based on the simplified calculation of the number of parallel tapes was proposed, which simplified the design process and reduced the design difficulty of the quenched FC-SFCL. Taking a 10 kV/500 A/5 kA quenched prototype as an example, its electromagnetic design was completed, and the performances of the non-quenched and quenched schemes were compared. The results showed that, compared to the non-quenched structure, the technical economics of the quenched one were more prominent, and it can be used preferentially for engineering prototypes. This study about the scheme of the quenched FC-SFCL and its electromagnetic design method is useful for promoting the implementation of the current limiter engineering prototype. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 9870 KiB  
Article
Utilizing Parallel Superconducting Element as a Novel Approach of Flux-Coupled Type SFCL to Limit DC Current in the System
by Muhammad Aurangzeb, Ai Xin, Sheeraz Iqbal, Flah Aymen, Michał Jasiński and Laura Jasińska
Electronics 2022, 11(22), 3785; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11223785 - 17 Nov 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2152
Abstract
To lessen the amount of energy lost during transmission, electricity is increasingly being sent using high-voltage lines. Transmission loss in a DC system is lower than in an AC system over long distances. The DC system can improve the efficiency of long-distance transmission [...] Read more.
To lessen the amount of energy lost during transmission, electricity is increasingly being sent using high-voltage lines. Transmission loss in a DC system is lower than in an AC system over long distances. The DC system can improve the efficiency of long-distance transmission by connecting power grids with different requirements. The DC method is becoming popular since it helps to keep the grid stable. Managing and blocking DC flow is crucial to system functionality. In this study, we explore the operation of a flux-coupled type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) in a DC system, where the two windings are connected in parallel to limit the fault current flow. A flux-coupled type SFCL is built by connecting two coils in parallel and a superconducting element (SE) in series with the secondary coil. The functions of an SFCL of the flux-coupled kind are equivalent in both direct and alternating current systems. Because of the opposing magnetic fluxes produced by the two coils, the voltage generated by the parallel connection of the coils is always zero. Inadequate SE leads to an increase in resistance, inhibiting the cancellation of opposing magnetic fluxes and hence a loss in power. Connecting the two coils in series allows voltage to be generated while the fault current is limited. To further validate the performance of SFCL with varying resistance and inductance, the system is additionally tested on the IEEE 39 bus system. The MATLAB/SIMULINK software suite is used to run the test system. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1761 KiB  
Article
DC Current Limiting Operation and Power Burden Characteristics of a Flux-Coupling Type SFCL Connected in Series between Two Windings
by Seok-Cheol Ko, Tae-Hee Han and Sung-Hun Lim
Electronics 2021, 10(9), 1087; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10091087 - 4 May 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2240
Abstract
In this paper, a DC fault short circuit was conducted to analyze the DC fault current limiting characteristics of a flux-coupling type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) that has two coils connected in series via one iron core. Similar to the AC power [...] Read more.
In this paper, a DC fault short circuit was conducted to analyze the DC fault current limiting characteristics of a flux-coupling type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) that has two coils connected in series via one iron core. Similar to the AC power system, the flux-coupling type SFCL in a DC system, which has the two coils connected with each other in series and the secondary coil connected with the superconducting element in parallel, remains in the superconducting state before a short-circuit accident occurs. This results in magnetic flux getting generated by the two windings connected in series offsetting each other and the induced voltage at the two windings remaining at zero. However, in the event of a short-circuit accident on the DC line, a resistance is generated on the superconducting element, so that the magnetic flux generated at the two windings no longer offsets each other. Therefore, a voltage is induced on the two windings, and the fault current is limited accordingly. As a result of configuring a DC short-circuit device and experimenting with this SFCL, we could confirm the DC fault current limiting effect of a flux-coupling type SFCL with two windings connected in series. In addition, we could establish performance conditions of the flux-coupling type SFCL in a DC system by inferring the fault current, operating current, and limited impedance equations according to the connection direction of the flux-coupling type SFCL with two windings connected in series and by analyzing fault current limiting degree, power burden, magnetic flux, and energy consumption for each element composing the SFCL. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2670 KiB  
Article
DC Current Limiting Characteristics of Flux-Coupled Type SFCL Using Superconducting Element Connected in Parallel in a DC System
by Young-Pil Kim and Seok-Cheol Ko
Energies 2021, 14(4), 1096; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14041096 - 19 Feb 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3062
Abstract
In this paper, the fault current limiting (FCL) characteristics of a flux-coupled type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) with parallel connection between two windings in a DC system were analyzed. The flux-coupled type SFCL was composed of two coils connected in parallel and [...] Read more.
In this paper, the fault current limiting (FCL) characteristics of a flux-coupled type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) with parallel connection between two windings in a DC system were analyzed. The flux-coupled type SFCL was composed of two coils connected in parallel and a superconducting element (SE), which was connected in series with the secondary coil. The flux-coupled type SFCL works in DC systems similar to those in AC systems. Before a fault occurs, the respective magnetic fluxes generated by the two coils connected in parallel offset each other, maintaining the voltage induced in the two coils at zero. In case of a fault, however, resistance is generated in the SE, preventing the magnetic fluxes generated by the two coils from offsetting each other. Thus, some voltage is induced in the two coils, and this starts to limit the fault current. DC short circuit tests were conducted, and the test results confirmed that the flux-coupled type SFCL with the two parallel connected coils was effective in limiting the fault current in a DC system. Additionally, the effect of the wiring direction of the two coils on the SFCL’s FCL performance and operating current, limiting impedance, and instantaneous power load was further analyzed, and as a result, the performance conditions of the SFCL in a DC system were determined. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1678 KiB  
Article
Magnetizing Characteristics of Bridge Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter (SFCL) with Simultaneous Quench Using Flux-Coupling
by Seok-Cheol Ko, Tae-Hee Han and Sung-Hun Lim
Energies 2020, 13(7), 1760; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13071760 - 7 Apr 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2158
Abstract
A bridge type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) with simultaneous quench using two high-temperature superconducting (HTSC) elements and two coils was fabricated to analyze the fault current limiting characteristics. Before and after the fault occurrence, the current limiting operation and the voltage waveforms [...] Read more.
A bridge type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) with simultaneous quench using two high-temperature superconducting (HTSC) elements and two coils was fabricated to analyze the fault current limiting characteristics. Before and after the fault occurrence, the current limiting operation and the voltage waveforms of each device were compared according to the change of the input voltage. We also analyzed flux linkages and instantaneous powers of the bridge type SFCL with simultaneous quench using flux-coupling composed of HTSC elements with different critical currents. During the fault period, the magnetization power area and the flux linkage’s operating range variation due to the magnetizing current were compared with each other. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section A1: Smart Grids and Microgrids)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1691 KiB  
Article
Fault Current Limiting Characteristics of a Small-Scale Bridge Type SFCL with Single HTSC Element Using Flux-Coupling
by Tae-Hee Han, Seok-Cheol Ko and Sung-Hun Lim
Electronics 2020, 9(4), 569; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9040569 - 28 Mar 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2578
Abstract
In this paper, a bridge type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) with a single high-temperature superconducting (HTSC) element is proposed to allow fault current limiting operation in direct current (DC) conditions. First, the principle of operation of the bridge type SFCL with a [...] Read more.
In this paper, a bridge type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) with a single high-temperature superconducting (HTSC) element is proposed to allow fault current limiting operation in direct current (DC) conditions. First, the principle of operation of the bridge type SFCL with a single HTSC element using flux-coupling was presented. After the fault occurrence, the fault current limiting operation and voltage characteristics, the power load characteristics of each device, and the energy consumption of the two coils and the HTSC element were analyzed in the proposed SFCL. As a result, it is confirmed that in the case of the additive polarity winding, the power consumption and the energy consumption of the HTSC element were lower than those in the subtractive polarity winding, and the fault current limiting characteristics were excellent. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Energy Systems with Superconductivity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 5791 KiB  
Article
Three-Phase Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter
by Haocong Shen, Fei Mei, Jianyong Zheng, Haoyuan Sha and Changjia She
Energies 2018, 11(12), 3471; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123471 - 12 Dec 2018
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4153
Abstract
The saturated-core fault current limiter (SFCL) is widely used to limit the fault current. However, in the conventional SFCL structure, alternating current (AC) and direct current (DC) coils are wound on different loosely coupled cores. Owing to the leakage inductance, the traditional structure [...] Read more.
The saturated-core fault current limiter (SFCL) is widely used to limit the fault current. However, in the conventional SFCL structure, alternating current (AC) and direct current (DC) coils are wound on different loosely coupled cores. Owing to the leakage inductance, the traditional structure demonstrates relatively large demand for DC excitation power and excessive impedance during saturation. In this study, a new structure for winding closely coupled DC and AC coils on the same core in three phases is proposed to reduce the influence of leakage reactance on the SFCL performance. The leakage magnetic flux generated by both structures is analyzed by performing finite element analysis simulations and utilizing a magnetic field division method. The impedance of the limiter is measured at different DC currents and air gaps to optimize its dynamic performance. A fabricated prototype of the proposed limiter exhibits smaller steady-state losses and high current-limiting capability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 6638 KiB  
Article
Coordinated Control of Superconducting Fault Current Limiter and Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage for Transient Performance Enhancement of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Generation System
by Lei Chen, Hongkun Chen, Jun Yang, Yanjuan Yu, Kaiwei Zhen, Yang Liu and Li Ren
Energies 2017, 10(1), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/en10010056 - 5 Jan 2017
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 7278
Abstract
In regard to the rapid development of renewable energy sources, more and more photovoltaic (PV) generation systems have been connected to main power networks, and it is critical to enhance their transient performance under short-circuit faults conditions. This paper proposes and studies the [...] Read more.
In regard to the rapid development of renewable energy sources, more and more photovoltaic (PV) generation systems have been connected to main power networks, and it is critical to enhance their transient performance under short-circuit faults conditions. This paper proposes and studies the coordinated control of a flux-coupling-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) and a superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES), to improve the fault ride through (FRT) capability and smooth the power fluctuation of a grid-connected PV generation system. Theoretical analyses of the device structure, operating principle and control strategy are conducted, and a detailed simulation model of 100 kW class PV generation system is built in MATLAB/SIMULINK. During the simulations of the symmetrical and asymmetrical faults, the maximum power point tracking (MPPT) control is disabled, and four different cases including without auxiliary, with SFCL, with SMES, and with SFCL-SMES, are compared. From the demonstrated results, the combination of without MPPT and with SFCL-SMES can more efficiently improve the point of common coupling (PCC) voltage sag, inhibit the DC-link overvoltage and alleviate the power fluctuation. Finally, a preliminary parameter optimization method is suggested for the SFCL and the SMES, and it is helpful to promote their future application in the real PV projects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 5785 KiB  
Article
Technical Evaluation of Superconducting Fault Current Limiters Used in a Micro-Grid by Considering the Fault Characteristics of Distributed Generation, Energy Storage and Power Loads
by Lei Chen, Xiude Tu, Hongkun Chen, Jun Yang, Yayi Wu, Xin Shu and Li Ren
Energies 2016, 9(10), 769; https://doi.org/10.3390/en9100769 - 23 Sep 2016
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 6176
Abstract
Concerning the development of a micro-grid integrated with multiple intermittent renewable energy resources, one of the main issues is related to the improvement of its robustness against short-circuit faults. In a sense, the superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) can be regarded as a [...] Read more.
Concerning the development of a micro-grid integrated with multiple intermittent renewable energy resources, one of the main issues is related to the improvement of its robustness against short-circuit faults. In a sense, the superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) can be regarded as a feasible approach to enhance the transient performance of a micro-grid under fault conditions. In this paper, the fault transient analysis of a micro-grid, including distributed generation, energy storage and power loads, is conducted, and regarding the application of one or more flux-coupling-type SFCLs in the micro-grid, an integrated technical evaluation method considering current-limiting performance, bus voltage stability and device cost is proposed. In order to assess the performance of the SFCLs and verify the effectiveness of the evaluation method, different fault cases of a 10-kV micro-grid with photovoltaic (PV), wind generator and energy storage are simulated in the MATLAB software. The results show that, the efficient use of the SFCLs for the micro-grid can contribute to reducing the fault current, improving the voltage sags and suppressing the frequency fluctuations. Moreover, there will be a compromise design to fully take advantage of the SFCL parameters, and thus, the transient performance of the micro-grid can be guaranteed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Distributed Renewable Generation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop