Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (28)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = flash glucose monitoring systems

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 738 KB  
Article
Effect of Atmospheric Temperature Variations on Glycemic Patterns of Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: Analysis as a Function of Different Therapeutic Treatments
by Alessandra Mascitelli, Stefano Tumini, Piero Chiacchiaretta, Eleonora Aruffo, Lorenza Sacrini, Maria Alessandra Saltarelli and Piero Di Carlo
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(12), 1850; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22121850 - 11 Dec 2025
Viewed by 215
Abstract
An overview of seasonal variations in glycaemic patterns in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes has been addressed in a previous work, which paved the way for an in-depth study involving not only traditional Multiple Dose Injection (MDI) therapy, but also [...] Read more.
An overview of seasonal variations in glycaemic patterns in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes has been addressed in a previous work, which paved the way for an in-depth study involving not only traditional Multiple Dose Injection (MDI) therapy, but also a comparative analysis with the use of Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop (AHCL) insulin pumps. The widespread use of Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM) and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) systems, as well as dedicated platforms for synchronizing and storing CGM reports, has facilitated an efficient approach to analyzing glycaemic patterns. The effect of environmental parameters on glycemic trends undoubtedly has a clinical relevance, which however can be appropriately managed by knowing the responses in patients treated with different therapeutic approaches. In this sense, it is possible to evaluate how the glycemic trend in diabetic patients, in relation to external temperatures, responds differently to therapies. In this work, the response, in terms of glucose level, in diabetic patients was analyzed, according to the different therapeutic approaches and in relation to variations in external temperature. For the same period of the previous work (one year: Autumn 2022–Summer 2023), seasonal variations in CGM metrics (i.e., Time In Range—TIR, Time Above Range—TAR, Time Below Range—TBR and Coefficient of Variation—CV) were analyzed. The results show a better metabolic control, linked to the effect of the algorithm on the trend of glycaemia. However, the analysis focused on the heatwave of July 2023 highlights the role of extreme temperatures as a stress factor in the insulin pumps performance. A further focus was carried out on the comparison of glycaemic patterns during the school and non-school period for all patients until 21 years old. Results suggest that during the school period, glycaemic patterns, in patients treated with MDI, show a greater onset of hyperglycaemia. From all that has emerged, it appears clear that structured education on diabetes self-management for patients and their families is fundamental and must take into account multiple factors (type of therapy, daily activities, atmospheric temperature) in order to keep their effects under control. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 265 KB  
Article
Flash Glucose Monitoring for Predicting Cardiogenic Shock Occurrence in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Pilot Study
by Velimir Altabas, Dorijan Babić, Anja Grulović, Tomislav Bulum and Zdravko Babić
Diagnostics 2025, 15(6), 685; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15060685 - 11 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1330
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Continuous and flash glucose monitoring (CGM and FGM) may enhance glucose management by providing real-time glucose data. Furthermore, growing evidence is linking altered blood glucose concentrations and worse short-term outcomes in critically ill patients. While hyperglycemia is more common in these patients [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Continuous and flash glucose monitoring (CGM and FGM) may enhance glucose management by providing real-time glucose data. Furthermore, growing evidence is linking altered blood glucose concentrations and worse short-term outcomes in critically ill patients. While hyperglycemia is more common in these patients and is associated with an increased risk of adverse events, hypoglycemia is particularly concerning and significantly raises the risk of fatal outcomes. This exploratory study investigated the link between FGM variables and cardiogenic shock in critically ill Coronary Care Unit (CCU) patients. Methods: Twenty-eight CCU patients (1 May 2021–31 January 2022) were monitored using a Libre FreeStyle system. Analyzed data included patient demographic and laboratory data, left ventricular ejection fraction, standard glucose monitoring, APACHE IV scores, and cardiogenic shock occurrence. Analysis was performed using the χ2 test, Mann–Whitney U test, and logistic regression. Results: Among the patients, 13 (46.43%) developed cardiogenic shock. FGM detected hypoglycemia in 18 (64.29%) patients, while standard methods in 6 (21.43%) patients. FGM-detected hypoglycemia was more frequent in patients who developed cardiogenic shock (p = 0.0129, χ2 test) with a significantly higher time below range reading (p = 0.0093, Mann Withney U test), despite no differences in mean glucose values. In addition, hypoglycemia detected by FGM was an independent predictor of shock (p = 0.0390, logistic regression). Conclusions: FGM identified more hypoglycemic events compared to standard glucose monitoring in the CCU. Frequent FGM-detected hypoglycemic events were associated with cardiogenic shock, regardless of a history of diabetes. Due to a limited sample size, these results should be interpreted cautiously and further research in this area is justified. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Modern Diabetes Diagnosis and Treatment Technology)
13 pages, 1065 KB  
Review
The History, Evolution and Future of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)
by Clara Bender, Peter Vestergaard and Simon Lebech Cichosz
Diabetology 2025, 6(3), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology6030017 - 3 Mar 2025
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 21542
Abstract
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and flash glucose monitoring (FGM) systems have revolutionized diabetes management by delivering real-time, dynamic insights into blood glucose levels. This article provides a concise overview of the evolution of CGM technology, highlights emerging innovations in the field and explores [...] Read more.
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and flash glucose monitoring (FGM) systems have revolutionized diabetes management by delivering real-time, dynamic insights into blood glucose levels. This article provides a concise overview of the evolution of CGM technology, highlights emerging innovations in the field and explores current and potential future applications (including insulin management, early diagnostics, predictive modeling, diabetes education and integration into automated insulin delivery (AID) systems) of CGM in healthcare. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2221 KB  
Article
Comparison between a Flash Glucose Monitoring System and a Portable Blood Glucose Meter for Monitoring of Cats with Diabetic Ketosis or Ketoacidosis
by Jennifer S. Eiermann, Katarina Hazuchova, Beatriz Vidondo, Miguel Campos, Simone Schuller and Yi Cui
Animals 2024, 14(19), 2787; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192787 - 26 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4394
Abstract
Cats with diabetic ketosis or ketoacidosis DK(A) require intensive glucose monitoring. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between a portable blood glucose meter (PBGM) and a flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS; FreeStyle Libre 2.0 Abbott®) measuring interstitial [...] Read more.
Cats with diabetic ketosis or ketoacidosis DK(A) require intensive glucose monitoring. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between a portable blood glucose meter (PBGM) and a flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS; FreeStyle Libre 2.0 Abbott®) measuring interstitial glucose in cats with DK(A). Ten client-owned cats with naturally occurring DK(A) were prospectively enrolled. Glucose concentrations were assessed with both methods every 1–3 h until resolution of DK(A), and every 4–8 h thereafter. While the median FGMS measured glucose concentration (14.3 mmol/L) was significantly lower than the median PBGM measured glucose concentration (19 mmol/L) (p < 0.001), the overall correlation between the FGMS and PBGM was high (r = 0.88; p < 0.001). In the Parkes error grid analysis, 98.3% of measurements fell in zones A and B. Bland–Altman plot analysis demonstrated that in the low glycaemic range (BG < 5.5 mmol/L), 50% of FGMS measurements deviated more than ±0.83 mmol/L, and in the high glycaemic range (BG > 5.5 mmol/L), 81% of results deviated >15% from the PBGM measurements. There was significant inter-individual variation in the difference between glucose concentrations measured by the FGMS and PBGM (p < 0.001). In spite of being more easily tolerated and easier to use, currently this method cannot be recommended for routine monitoring of cats with DK(A). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Veterinary Clinical Studies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 435 KB  
Article
The Interplay between Dietary Habits and Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes: A Comprehensive Prospective FGM Study
by Maja Gradinjan Centner, Daniela Čačić Kenjerić, Ema Schönberger, Hrvoje Centner, Daria Sladić Rimac, Kristina Steiner, Romana Marušić, Miro Bakula, Daniela Fabris Vitković, Ivica Mihaljević, Ines Bilić Ćurčić and Silvija Canecki Varžić
Life 2024, 14(9), 1153; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14091153 - 12 Sep 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3849
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes has become prevalent among the adult population, who have increasingly gained access to sensing technology. This study delved into the impact of diet, nutritional status, and the use of a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM) on glycemic regulation among adults [...] Read more.
Type 1 diabetes has become prevalent among the adult population, who have increasingly gained access to sensing technology. This study delved into the impact of diet, nutritional status, and the use of a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM) on glycemic regulation among adults diagnosed with T1D. Employing a prospective design, data were gathered from 151 participants aged 18–60 across multiple cycles. Participants utilized the FreeStyle Libre (FSL) Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM) System and provided dietary details via questionnaires and diaries. The findings unveiled correlations between dietary patterns and glycemic control, with higher protein intake associated with improved glycated hemoglobin A1C values (p = 0.019), yet elevated fat and protein consumption was linked to heightened rates of hyperglycemia. Conversely, no significant relationship was observed between dietary variables and hypoglycemia occurrence. Interestingly, subjects with more readings of glucose levels consumed fewer carbohydrates (p = 0.004) and more proteins (p = 0.000). Furthermore, physical activity and marital status correlated with glycemic stability, while higher education was associated with enhanced glycemic control (p = 0.021). This study confirmed the importance of structured education on glycemic regulation and the importance of dietary patterns in glucose management. Also, the educational role of the FGM system in changing dietary habits was confirmed, which is one of the key factors for improving glycemic regulation in continuous glucose monitoring system users. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 208 KB  
Communication
Impact of the FreeStyle Libre 2® System on Glycaemic Outcomes in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes—Preliminary Study
by Katarzyna Rutkowska, Agnieszka Łoś-Stegienta, Michał Bagiński, Ewa Zięba, Adrianna Baran, Monika Żurawska-Kliś, Marcin Kosiński and Katarzyna Cypryk
Diagnostics 2024, 14(16), 1777; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14161777 - 15 Aug 2024
Viewed by 2864
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes during the first three months of use of the flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system. Methods: We conducted a study of a cohort of 81 people with type 1 diabetes mellitus who [...] Read more.
We aimed to evaluate glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes during the first three months of use of the flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system. Methods: We conducted a study of a cohort of 81 people with type 1 diabetes mellitus who used the FreeStyle Libre 2 (FSL2) sensor continuously for 3 months. Patients had not used a CGM before. The effectiveness of using the FSL2 system was assessed using AGP reports at two time points (3–4 weeks and 11–12 weeks of system use). Results: Eight weeks after using FSL2, compared with results from 3–4 weeks of use, there were no differences in the glucose management indicator, time spent in range, above range and below range, or glucose variability. In the first month of FGM use, patients scanned the sensor significantly more often than in the following two months (p = 0.021). No significant differences were found in the change of the evaluated parameters when comparing patients by duration of diabetes and treatment method. Conclusions: Short-term use of FSL2 promotes a significant reduction in GMI in patients with more time spent in hyperglycaemia (especially > 250 mg/dL). In this short period of use, no other changes in glycaemic control parameters are observed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Point-of-Care Diagnostics and Devices)
11 pages, 2374 KB  
Article
The Impact of Atmospheric Temperature Variations on Glycaemic Patterns in Children and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes
by Piero Chiacchiaretta, Stefano Tumini, Alessandra Mascitelli, Lorenza Sacrini, Maria Alessandra Saltarelli, Maura Carabotta, Jacopo Osmelli, Piero Di Carlo and Eleonora Aruffo
Climate 2024, 12(8), 121; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12080121 - 12 Aug 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4490
Abstract
Seasonal variations in glycaemic patterns in children and young adults affected by type 1 diabetes are currently poorly studied. However, the spread of Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems and of dedicated platforms for the synchronization and conservation of [...] Read more.
Seasonal variations in glycaemic patterns in children and young adults affected by type 1 diabetes are currently poorly studied. However, the spread of Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems and of dedicated platforms for the synchronization and conservation of CGM reports allows an efficient approach to the comprehension of these phenomena. Moreover, the impact that environmental parameters may have on glycaemic control takes on clinical relevance, implying a need to properly educate patients and their families. In this context, it can be investigated how blood glucose patterns in diabetic patients may have a link to outdoor temperatures. Therefore, in this study, the relationship between outdoor temperatures and glucose levels in diabetic patients, aged between 4 and 21 years old, has been analysed. For a one-year period (Autumn 2022–Summer 2023), seasonal variations in their CGM metrics (i.e., time in range (TIR), Time Above Range (TAR), Time Below Range (TBR), and coefficient of variation (CV)) were analysed with respect to atmospheric temperature. The results highlight a negative correlation between glucose in diabetic patients and temperature patterns (R value computed considering data for the entire year; Ry = −0.49), behaviour which is strongly confirmed by the analysis focused on the July 2023 heatwave (R = −0.67), which shows that during heatwave events, the anticorrelation is accentuated. The diurnal analysis shows how glucose levels fluctuate throughout the day, potentially correlating with atmospheric diurnal temperature changes in addition to the standard trend. Data captured during the July 2023 heatwave (17–21 July 2023) highlight pronounced deviations from the long-term average, signalling the rapid effects of extreme temperatures on glucose regulation. Our findings underscore the need to integrate meteorological parameters into diabetes management and clinical trial designs. These results suggest that structured diabetes self-management education of patients and their families should include adequate warnings about the effects of atmospheric temperature variations on the risk of hypoglycaemia and about the negative effects of excessive therapeutic inertia in the adjustment of insulin doses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Change, Health and Multidisciplinary Approaches)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1953 KB  
Article
The Impact of Diabetes Education on Continuous Glucose Monitoring in SUS-Dependent Patients in a Northeastern Brazilian City
by Lysandro Pinto Borges, Pamela Chaves de Jesus, Jessiane Bispo de Souza, Deise Maria Rego Rodrigues Silva, Pedro Henrique Macedo Moura, Ronaldy Santana Santos, Marina dos Santos Barreto, Adriana Gibara Guimarães, Lucas Alves da Mota Santana, Dennyson Leandro Mathias da Fonseca, Ikaro Daniel de Carvalho Barreto, Breno de Mello Silva, Carla Raquel Pereira Oliveira, Karla Freire Rezende, Naira Horta Melo, Elenalda Ferreira dos Santos, Carmem Lúcia Matias de Queiroz, Lucia Helena Modesto Xavier, Otávio Cabral-Marques and Eloia Emanuelly Dias Silva
Life 2024, 14(3), 320; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14030320 - 28 Feb 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 5199
Abstract
Background: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is an important chronic disease that occurs worldwide. Aims: This study aims to investigate how the use of the FreeStyle® Libre system in Unified Health System (SUS) patients impacts diabetes parameters in patients who receive education on proper [...] Read more.
Background: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is an important chronic disease that occurs worldwide. Aims: This study aims to investigate how the use of the FreeStyle® Libre system in Unified Health System (SUS) patients impacts diabetes parameters in patients who receive education on proper insulin administration and the use of the continuous monitoring device, as well as how this affects patients without any concomitant multidisciplinary support in Sergipe, Brazil. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized study in a diabetes clinic in Sergipe, Brazil, using the flash method FreeStyle® Libre (Abbott). The participants were divided into two groups: one receiving diabetes education on CGM (continuous glucose monitoring), while the other did not. Before the intervention, the patient’s treatment motivation and quality of life were assessed using a questionnaire, and baseline levels of glycated hemoglobin were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and the point of care AlereTM Afinion with boronate fixation. We compared first- and second-phase data with respect to glycated hemoglobin, mean interstitial blood glucose, time on and above target for hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic events, and mean hypoglycemic duration. Results: In group A, which received the diabetes education intervention, there was a significant reduction in average HbA1c levels from 8.6% to 7.9% after 3 months (p = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in average glycemic values. Time above target decreased significantly from 50.62% to 29.43% (p = 0.0001), while time below target decreased from 22.90% to 20.21% (p = 0.002). There was no significant change in the number of hypoglycemic events, but the duration of hypoglycemia decreased significantly from 130.35 min to 121.18 min after 3 months (p = 0.0001). In Group B, there was no significant difference in mean HbA1c levels before (7.07%) and after (7.28%) sensor installation. This group maintained lower HbA1c levels compared to the other group. Average blood glucose levels also remained similar before (148.37 mg/dL) and after (154.65 mg/dL) the intervention. Although the time above the target glucose level increased significantly from 35.94% to 48.17%, the time at target decreased from 50.40% to 37.97%. No significant changes were observed in the time below target, the number of hypoglycemic events, or the duration of hypoglycemia. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that utilizing continuous glucose monitoring technology can enhance glycemic control, particularly in motivated, educated, low-income patients dependent on the SUS. To achieve positive results with FreeStyle Libre, it is imperative to allocate resources for multidisciplinary support. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 452 KB  
Article
Diabetes Technology in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes—Distribution and Effects on Glycemic Regulation and Perinatal Outcomes
by Sara Yalda Ghaur, Pernille Bundgaard Grinderslev, Magnus Leth-Møller, Per Glud Ovesen, Jens Fuglsang, Sanne Fisker, H. David McIntyre and Ulla Kampmann
Reprod. Med. 2024, 5(1), 12-22; https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed5010002 - 7 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4155
Abstract
Pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes (TID) are associated with an increased risk of obstetric and neonatal adverse outcomes. Optimal glycemic control prior to and through pregnancy is crucial to reduce complications. The use of diabetes technology is rapidly increasing. The aim of [...] Read more.
Pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes (TID) are associated with an increased risk of obstetric and neonatal adverse outcomes. Optimal glycemic control prior to and through pregnancy is crucial to reduce complications. The use of diabetes technology is rapidly increasing. The aim of the study was to investigate the use and effects of diabetes technology in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. A retrospective cohort study was conducted; 84 women were included in the analysis and were divided into subgroups according to their glucose monitoring method and insulin delivery method. HbA1c values declined during pregnancy in all subgroups with no significant difference between the subgroups. A difference was, however, found in birth weight z-scores. Women using a sensor and an insulin pump had larger babies compared to women without these treatment modalities. The results of the study indicate that diabetes technology, including insulin pumps and/or glucose sensors are not superior to self-monitoring blood glucose measurement and multiple daily injection insulin therapy, which is comforting in the light of the unequal access to health benefits. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 1484 KB  
Article
Analytical Performance of the Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System FreeStyle Libre2TM in Healthy Women
by Zhuoxiu Jin, Alice E. Thackray, James A. King, Kevin Deighton, Melanie J. Davies and David J. Stensel
Sensors 2023, 23(17), 7417; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23177417 - 25 Aug 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4622
Abstract
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is used clinically and for research purposes to capture glycaemic profiles. The accuracy of CGM among healthy populations has not been widely assessed. This study assessed agreement between glucose concentrations obtained from venous plasma and from CGM (FreeStyle Libre2 [...] Read more.
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is used clinically and for research purposes to capture glycaemic profiles. The accuracy of CGM among healthy populations has not been widely assessed. This study assessed agreement between glucose concentrations obtained from venous plasma and from CGM (FreeStyle Libre2TM, Abbott Diabetes Care, Witney, UK) in healthy women. Glucose concentrations were assessed after fasting and every 15 min after a standardized breakfast over a 4-h lab period. Accuracy of CGM was determined by Bland–Altman plot, 15/15% sensor agreement analysis, Clarke error grid analysis (EGA) and mean absolute relative difference (MARD). In all, 429 valid CGM readings with paired venous plasma glucose (VPG) values were obtained from 29 healthy women. Mean CGM readings were 1.14 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.97 to 1.30 mmol/L, p < 0.001) higher than VPG concentrations. Ratio 95% limits of agreement were from 0.68 to 2.20, and a proportional bias (slope: 0.22) was reported. Additionally, 45% of the CGM readings were within ±0.83 mmol/L (±15 mg/dL) or ±15% of VPG, while 85.3% were within EGA Zones A + B (clinically acceptable). MARD was 27.5% (95% CI: 20.8, 34.2%), with higher MARD values in the hypoglycaemia range and when VPG concentrations were falling. The FreeStyle Libre2TM CGM system tends to overestimate glucose concentrations compared to venous plasma samples in healthy women, especially during hypoglycaemia and during glycaemic swings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomedical Electronics and Wearable Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1618 KB  
Article
Metabolic Syndrome as a Factor of Impairment of Antioxidant Defense System in Youth with T1DM
by Monika Grabia, Katarzyna Socha, Artur Bossowski and Renata Markiewicz-Żukowska
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(11), 9428; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119428 - 29 May 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2473
Abstract
Research indicates that adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) may develop both metabolic syndrome (MetS) and oxidative stress. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that MetS could potentially affect antioxidant defense parameters. The study recruited adolescents aged 10–17 [...] Read more.
Research indicates that adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) may develop both metabolic syndrome (MetS) and oxidative stress. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that MetS could potentially affect antioxidant defense parameters. The study recruited adolescents aged 10–17 who had been diagnosed with T1DM, and divided them into two groups: “MetS+” (n = 22), who had been diagnosed with MetS, and “MetS−” (n = 81), who did not have metabolic syndrome. A control group consisting of 60 healthy peers without T1DM was included for comparison. The study examined cardiovascular parameters, such as complete lipid profile and estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), as well as markers of antioxidant defense. The results revealed a statistically significant difference between the MetS+ and the MetS− group in terms of total antioxidant status (TAS) (1.186 mmol/L vs. 1.330 mmol/L), and oxidative stress index (OSI) levels (0.666 vs. 0.533). Furthermore, multivariate correspondence analysis identified individuals with HbA1c < 8%; eGDR > 8 mg/kg/min, using either flash or continuous glucose monitoring systems, as MetS− patients. The study also found that eGDR (AUC 0.85, p < 0.001), OSI and HbA1c (AUC 0.71, p < 0.001) markers may be useful for diagnosing the onset of MetS in adolescents with T1DM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oxidative Stress and Metabolic Diseases)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 1667 KB  
Article
Performance of the FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System during an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and Exercise in Healthy Adolescents
by Sahar Afeef, Keith Tolfrey, Julia K. Zakrzewski-Fruer and Laura A. Barrett
Sensors 2023, 23(9), 4249; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23094249 - 25 Apr 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 5926
Abstract
This study’s aim was to assess FreeStyle Libre Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) performance during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and treadmill exercise in healthy adolescents. This should advance the feasibility and utility of user-friendly technologies for metabolic assessments in adolescents. Seventeen healthy [...] Read more.
This study’s aim was to assess FreeStyle Libre Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) performance during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and treadmill exercise in healthy adolescents. This should advance the feasibility and utility of user-friendly technologies for metabolic assessments in adolescents. Seventeen healthy adolescents (nine girls aged 12.8 ± 0.9 years) performed an OGTT and submaximal and maximal treadmill exercise tests in a laboratory setting. The scanned interstitial fluid glucose concentration ([ISFG]) obtained by FGM was compared against finger-prick capillary plasma glucose concentration ([CPG]) at 0 (pre-OGTT), −15, −30, −60, −120 min post-OGTT, pre-, mid-, post- submaximal exercise, and pre- and post- maximal exercise. Overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 13.1 ± 8.5%, and 68% (n = 113) of the paired glucose data met the ISO 15197:2013 criteria. For clinical accuracy, 84% and 16% of FGM readings were within zones A and B in the Consensus Error Grid (CEG), respectively, which met the ISO 15197:2013 criteria of having at least 99% of results within these zones. Scanned [ISFG] were statistically lower than [CPG] at 15 (−1.16 mmol∙L−1, p < 0.001) and 30 min (−0.74 mmol∙L−1, p = 0.041) post-OGTT. Yet, post-OGTT glycaemic responses assessed by total and incremental areas under the curve (AUCs) were not significantly different, with trivial to small effect sizes (p ≥ 0.084, d = 0.14–0.45). Further, [ISFGs] were not different from [CPGs] during submaximal and maximal exercise tests (interaction p ≥ 0.614). FGM can be a feasible alternative to reflect postprandial glycaemia (AUCs) in healthy adolescents who may not endure repeated finger pricks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensor Technologies for Human Health Monitoring)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2050 KB  
Article
Management of Glycemia during Acute Aerobic and Resistance Training in Patients with Diabetes Type 1: A Croatian Pilot Study
by Marul Ivandic, Maja Cigrovski Berkovic, Klara Ormanac, Dea Sabo, Tea Omanovic Kolaric, Lucija Kuna, Vjera Mihaljevic, Silvija Canecki Varzic, Martina Smolic and Ines Bilic-Curcic
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(6), 4966; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064966 - 11 Mar 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4097
Abstract
(1) Background: The increased risk of developing hypoglycemia and worsening of glycemic stability during exercise is a major cause of concern for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). (2) Aim: This pilot study aimed to assess glycemic stability and hypoglycemic episodes during [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The increased risk of developing hypoglycemia and worsening of glycemic stability during exercise is a major cause of concern for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). (2) Aim: This pilot study aimed to assess glycemic stability and hypoglycemic episodes during and after aerobic versus resistance exercises using a flash glucose monitoring system in patients with T1DM. (3) Participants and Methods: We conducted a randomized crossover prospective study including 14 adult patients with T1DM. Patients were randomized according to the type of exercise (aerobic vs. resistance) with a recovery period of three days between a change of groups. Glucose stability and hypoglycemic episodes were evaluated during and 24 h after the exercise. Growth hormone (GH), cortisol, and lactate levels were determined at rest, 0, 30, and 60 min post-exercise period. (4) Results: The median age of patients was 53 years, with a median HbA1c of 7.1% and a duration of diabetes of 30 years. During both training sessions, there was a drop in glucose levels immediately after the exercise (0′), followed by an increase at 30′ and 60′, although the difference was not statistically significant. However, glucose levels significantly decreased from 60′ to 24 h in the post-exercise period (p = 0.001) for both types of exercise. Glycemic stability was comparable prior to and after exercise for both training sessions. No differences in the number of hypoglycemic episodes, duration of hypoglycemia, and average glucose level in 24 h post-exercise period were observed between groups. Time to hypoglycemia onset was prolonged after the resistance as opposed to aerobic training (13 vs. 8 h, p = NS). There were no nocturnal hypoglycemic episodes (between 0 and 6 a.m.) after the resistance compared to aerobic exercise (4 vs. 0, p = NS). GH and cortisol responses were similar between the two sessions, while lactate levels were significantly more increased after resistance training. (5) Conclusion: Both exercise regimes induced similar blood glucose responses during and immediately following acute exercise. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sports Medicine and Physical Rehabilitation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1510 KB  
Article
Monitoring of Diabetes Mellitus Using the Flash Glucose Monitoring System: The Owners’ Point of View
by Mariachiara Re, Francesca Del Baldo, Antonio Maria Tardo and Federico Fracassi
Vet. Sci. 2023, 10(3), 203; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10030203 - 7 Mar 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4776
Abstract
The flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS) has recently become one of the most common monitoring methods in dogs and cats with diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of FGMS on the quality of life of diabetic pet [...] Read more.
The flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS) has recently become one of the most common monitoring methods in dogs and cats with diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of FGMS on the quality of life of diabetic pet owners (DPOs). Fifty DPOs were asked to answer a 30-question survey. More than 80% of DPOs considered FGMS easier to use and less stressful and painful for the animal compared to blood glucose curves (BGCs). Overall, 92% of DPOs reported that their pet had better diabetes control since using FGMS. The most challenging aspects of using the FGMS were ensuring proper sensor fixation during the wearing period (47%), preventing premature detachment (40%), and purchasing the sensor (34%). Moreover, 36% of DPOs reported that the device cost was difficult to afford in the long term. Comparing dogs and cats, a significantly higher number of dogs’ owners found the FGMS to be well-tolerated (79% vs. 40%), less invasive than BGCs (79% vs. 43%), and easier to maintain in situ (76% vs. 43%). In conclusion, FGMS is considered by DPOs to be easy to use and less stressful compared to BGCs, while enabling better glycemic control. Nevertheless, the costs related to its long-term use might be difficult to sustain. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Veterinary Internal Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 961 KB  
Review
What Nephrologists Should Know about the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis
by Faiza Lamine, Menno Pruijm, Virginie Bahon and Anne Zanchi
Kidney Dial. 2022, 2(3), 459-473; https://doi.org/10.3390/kidneydial2030042 - 11 Aug 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 9509
Abstract
Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on renal replacement therapy represent a specific population with high morbidity and mortality, an increased risk of hypoglycemic episodes and large intra- and interdialysis glycemic variability. Antidiabetic treatment adjustment is therefore challenging, [...] Read more.
Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on renal replacement therapy represent a specific population with high morbidity and mortality, an increased risk of hypoglycemic episodes and large intra- and interdialysis glycemic variability. Antidiabetic treatment adjustment is therefore challenging, especially in insulin-treated patients. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly proposed to T2D patients on hemodialysis (HD), although data regarding flash monitoring systems (FMSs) and real-time CGM (rtCGM) in HD patients are limited. Small CGM pilot studies of a short duration demonstrated improvements in glycemic control and decreased hypoglycemic events, despite a lower accuracy of CGM as compared to capillary blood glucose. Moreover, CGM–drug interactions with vitamin C, mannitol and paracetamol can occur in HD diabetic patients and need further study. Despite these shortcomings, professional CGM has the potential to become an integral part of glucose monitoring of HD patients treated with insulin. Personal CGM prescriptions can especially be useful in highly selected, motivated T2D HD patients on multiple daily insulin injections or experiencing frequent hypoglycemia with preserved diabetes self-management abilities or in whom diabetes is fully managed by medical providers. A close collaboration between the clinical staff working on HD units and diabetology teams, and ongoing patient education, are mandatory for optimal use of CGM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diabetic Kidney Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop