Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (14)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = familial intestinal gastric cancer

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 629 KiB  
Review
The Significance of Nectin Family Proteins in Various Cancerogenous Processes
by Wiktoria Romańczyk and Anna Pryczynicz
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(7), 3200; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073200 - 30 Mar 2025
Viewed by 864
Abstract
Nectins constitute a family of Ca(2+)-independent immunoglobulin-like adhesion molecules. They are involved in cell proliferation, morphogenesis, growth, development, and immune modulation. Due to their broad involvement in physiological processes, extensive research is being conducted on the expression of individual nectins in a variety [...] Read more.
Nectins constitute a family of Ca(2+)-independent immunoglobulin-like adhesion molecules. They are involved in cell proliferation, morphogenesis, growth, development, and immune modulation. Due to their broad involvement in physiological processes, extensive research is being conducted on the expression of individual nectins in a variety of cancers and their potential in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. The overexpression of nectin-1 may be a poor prognostic factor in gastrointestinal cancers (intestine and pancreas). Similarly, the overexpression of nectin-2 is a worse prognostic factor (greater tumor advancement and shorter patient survival) in cancers such as gallbladder, esophagus, and breast cancer. Changes in nectin-3 expression also affect the advancement of, e.g., colorectal cancer. Additionally, a significant factor here seems to be the change in the localization of nectin-3 expression within cellular structures. The most extensively studied nectin-4 also shows prognostic potential in many cancers. Most often, its high expression correlates with poor prognosis (e.g., gastric cancer), but it may also be a positive prognostic factor, e.g., in salivary gland cancer. Therapy based on nectin-4 is already known and used in the case of urothelial cancers. The expression of nectin-like protein 5 (necl-5) also shows prognostic and therapeutic potential in pancreatic and lung cancers, as well as in multiple myeloma. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 4868 KiB  
Article
Gut Microbiome Changes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery in Patients with Gastric Cancer
by Kristina Žukauskaitė, Bernardas Baušys, Angela Horvath, Rasa Sabaliauskaitė, Agnė Šeštokaitė, Agata Mlynska, Sonata Jarmalaitė, Vanessa Stadlbauer, Rimantas Baušys and Augustinas Baušys
Cancers 2024, 16(23), 4074; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16234074 - 5 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1583
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical gastrectomy is the current standard approach for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) in the West. Both NAC and gastrectomy can significantly influence the gut microbiome, potentially leading to clinically significant changes. However, no longitudinal studies to [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical gastrectomy is the current standard approach for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) in the West. Both NAC and gastrectomy can significantly influence the gut microbiome, potentially leading to clinically significant changes. However, no longitudinal studies to date support this hypothesis. This study investigates gut microbiome changes throughout GC treatment, including NAC and gastrectomy. Methods: This longitudinal observational study included GC patients undergoing NAC followed by gastrectomy. Fecal microbiome composition, intestinal inflammation (fecal calprotectin), and gut permeability (LBP, sCD14) markers were investigated at baseline, after NAC, and after gastrectomy. Results: A total of 38 patients were included in the study. The results showed that NAC did not affect the gut microbiome composition at the phylum level. In contrast, radical gastrectomy led to an increased abundance of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria and a decreased abundance of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria. Furthermore, NAC alone did not impact alpha or beta diversity, while a combination of NAC and gastrectomy significantly influenced both. After gastrectomy, the gut microbiome composition analysis also revealed enrichment of oralization-associated bacterial species such as Escherichia-Shigella, Streptococcus equinus, uncultured Streptococcus species, and species from the Enterobacteriaceae family. Intestinal inflammation and gut permeability markers did not significantly change throughout the treatment. Conclusions: The radical treatment of advanced GC with NAC and radical surgery has long-term effects on the gut microbiome, characterized by gut microbiome oralization. These sustained alterations primarily stem from the radical gastrectomy rather than the NAC. Since previous studies have linked oralization-associated dysbiosis to various gastrointestinal symptoms, this study highlights the gut microbiome as a potential therapeutic target to enhance the quality of life in long-term survivors following gastrectomy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Esophageal Cancer Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1094 KiB  
Article
Prevalence of Abnormalities at Tandem Endoscopy in Patients Referred for Colorectal Cancer Screening/Surveillance Colonoscopy
by George Triadafilopoulos
Cancers 2024, 16(23), 3998; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16233998 - 29 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1233
Abstract
Introduction: Performing a tandem endoscopy and colonoscopy in selected individuals has advantages, such as the early detection of benign and/or precancerous foregut diseases; it is efficient, and it may allow added therapies. It may also have disadvantages, such as generating anxiety from false-positive [...] Read more.
Introduction: Performing a tandem endoscopy and colonoscopy in selected individuals has advantages, such as the early detection of benign and/or precancerous foregut diseases; it is efficient, and it may allow added therapies. It may also have disadvantages, such as generating anxiety from false-positive screening, possible harm from further testing, and unproven cost-effectiveness. Aims: We aimed to examine the prevalence of foregut endoscopic and histologic abnormalities in subjects referred for screening/surveillance colonoscopy who also underwent a tandem endoscopy. We wanted to (1) assess implications for cancer detection, intervention, and surveillance of precancerous foregut abnormalities, (2) identify benign foregut lesions, and (3) generate data on the utilities of this tandem approach. Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive subjects referred for screening or surveillance colonoscopy who also underwent an endoscopy. Based on national screening guidelines, responses to prompting questions, personal or family history, or other risk factors, subjects were assigned to tandem endoscopy with biopsies (modified Seattle and Sydney protocols), under one anesthesia. Results: Of the 1004 patients referred for colonoscopy, 317 (32%) underwent tandem endoscopy. There were 214 women and 103 men. There were 237 Whites, 16 Asians, 40 Blacks, and 24 Hispanics. Median age was 59 (range 19–85). At endoscopy, we identified actionable benign (45%) peptic, inflammatory, and H. pylori-related abnormalities, and premalignant findings (i.e., intestinal metaplasia, 27%, dysplasia, 2%, and cancer 0.9%), comparable to the premalignant (40.3%) and malignant (0.6%) colonoscopy yield. Conclusions: When implemented based on national screening guidelines, tandem EGD and colonoscopy combines Barrett’s esophagus and gastric cancer screening in one examination, and it has a high yield in a diverse US population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Oncology: State-of-the-Art Research in the USA)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2165 KiB  
Article
Epidemiology, Risk Factors for Gastric Cancer and Surveillance of Premalignant Gastric Lesions: A Prospective Cohort Study of Central Saudi Arabia
by Georgios Zacharakis, Abdulaziz Almasoud, Omar Arahmane, Jamaan Alzahrani and Sameer Al-Ghamdi
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(9), 8338-8351; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090605 - 11 Sep 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3356
Abstract
(1) Background: Saudi Arabia (SA) is a country with a low incidence of gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we sought to assess the epidemiology of GC, its clinicopathological profiles, and its association with risk factors as well as to identify premalignant gastric [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Saudi Arabia (SA) is a country with a low incidence of gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we sought to assess the epidemiology of GC, its clinicopathological profiles, and its association with risk factors as well as to identify premalignant gastric lesions (PGL) and examine neoplastic progression. (2) Methods: This five-year prospective study screened for GC and PGL in asymptomatic Saudi patients, aged 45–75 years (n = 35,640) and living in Al Kharj, Riyadh province in central SA. Those who were positive in a high-sensitivity guaiac fecal occult blood test (HSgFOBT+) and had negative results in colonoscopy offered to undergo upper GI endoscopy (n = 1242). Factors associated with GC were examined. (3) Results: The five-year participation rate was 87% (1080/1242). The incidence rate of GC was 26.9 new cases per 100,000 population per year (9.6 new cases per year/total population at risk—35,640), and it was 8.9 cases per 1000 persons per year among the 1080 subjects with HSgFOBT+ and negative colonoscopy results. The five-year mortality rate was 67% among patients with GC (n = 48), 3.0% among participants in the gastric screening program (n = 1080) and 0.09% among the original population participating in the colorectal screening program (n = 35,640). Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma was the most frequent type (77%), with the tumor most commonly located in the antrum (41%). Overall, 334 participants had PGL, and seven of them (2.1%) showed neoplastic progression to GC during the follow-up. Factors associated with GC were age, Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection, obesity (body mass index BMI > 30), smoking, a diet of salty preserved foods, low income and a family history of GC. (4) Conclusions: The incidence of GC is low in central SA, but screening for PGL and GC among patients with HSgFOBT+ and negative colonoscopy may prevent or result in the early treatment of GC. HP eradication, normal body weight, not smoking and adhering to a healthy diet can reduce the risk of GC. The resulting data provide important input for the improvement of national guidelines. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Real-Time Monitoring for Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis)
(This article belongs to the Section Gastrointestinal Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2903 KiB  
Article
Helicobacter pylori Status May Differentiate Two Distinct Pathways of Gastric Adenocarcinoma Carcinogenesis
by Martin Tobi, Douglas Weinstein, Mijin Kim, James Hatfield, Paula Sochacki, Edi Levi, Teisa An, Merlin Hamre, Vasundhara Tolia, Suzanne Fligiel, Rama Marepally, Jason Hallman, Bharati Bapat, Mei Yuan, Benita McVicker and Steven Gallinger
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(9), 7950-7963; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090578 - 29 Aug 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2019
Abstract
Background: We evaluated the phenotype of sporadic gastric cancer based on HP status and binding of a tumor risk marker monoclonal, Adnab-9. Methods: We compared a familial GC kindred with an extremely aggressive phenotype to HP-positive (HP+) and -negative (HP−) sporadic gastric adenocarcinoma [...] Read more.
Background: We evaluated the phenotype of sporadic gastric cancer based on HP status and binding of a tumor risk marker monoclonal, Adnab-9. Methods: We compared a familial GC kindred with an extremely aggressive phenotype to HP-positive (HP+) and -negative (HP−) sporadic gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) patients in the same community to determine if similar phenotypes exist. This might facilitate gene discovery to understand the pathogenesis of aggressive GC phenotypes, particularly with publications implicating immune-related gene-based signatures, and the development of techniques to gauge the stance of the innate immune system (InImS), such as the FERAD ratio (blood ferritin:fecal Adnab-9 binding OD-background binding). Resection specimens for the sporadic and familial group were stained for HP and examined for intestinal metaplasia (IM) and immunostaining for Adnab-9. Familial kindred specimens were also tested for the E-cadherin mutation and APC (adenomatous polyposis coli). Survival was evaluated. Results: Of 40 GC patients, 25% were HP+ with a greater proportion of intestinal metaplasia (IM) and gastric atrophy than the HP− group. The proband of the familial GC kindred, a 32-year-old mother with fatal GC, was survived by 13-year-old identical twins. Twin #1 was HP− with IM and Twin #2 was HP+. Both twins subsequently died of GC within two years. The twins did not have APC or E-cadherin mutations. The mean overall survival in the HP+ sporadic GC group was 2.47 ± 2.58 years and was 0.57 ± 0.60 years in the HP− group (p = 0.01). Survival in the kindred was 0.22 ± 0.24 years. Adnab-9 labeling was positive in fixed tissues of 50% of non-familial GC patients and in gastric tissue extract from Twin #2. The FERAD ratio was determined separately in six prospectively followed patient groups (n = 458) and was significantly lower in the gastric cancer patients (n = 10) and patients with stomach conditions predisposing them to GC (n = 214), compared to controls (n = 234 patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer but without cancer), suggesting a failure of the InImS. Conclusion: The HP+ sporadic GC group appears to proceed through a sequence of HP infection, IM and atrophy before cancer supervenes, and the HP− phenotype appear to omit this sequence. The familial cases may represent a subset with both features, but the natural history strongly resembles that of the HP− group. Two different paths of carcinogenesis may exist locally for sporadic GC. The InImS may also be implicated in prognosis. Identifying these patients will allow for treatment stratification and early diagnosis to improve GC survival. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 642 KiB  
Article
Hereditary Gastric Cancer: Single-Gene or Multigene Panel Testing? A Mono-Institutional Experience
by Mariarosaria Calvello, Monica Marabelli, Sara Gandini, Elena Marino, Loris Bernard, Matteo Dal Molin, Giulia Di Cola, Cristina Zanzottera, Giovanni Corso, Nicola Fazio, Lorenzo Gervaso, Uberto Fumagalli Romario, Massimo Barberis, Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga, Lucio Bertario, Davide Serrano and Bernardo Bonanni
Genes 2023, 14(5), 1077; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14051077 - 13 May 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2776
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) has long been a ‘Cinderella’ among hereditary cancers. Until recently, single-gene testing (SGT) was the only approach to identify high-risk individuals. With the spread of multigene panel testing (MGPT), a debate arose on the involvement of other genes, particularly those [...] Read more.
Gastric cancer (GC) has long been a ‘Cinderella’ among hereditary cancers. Until recently, single-gene testing (SGT) was the only approach to identify high-risk individuals. With the spread of multigene panel testing (MGPT), a debate arose on the involvement of other genes, particularly those pertaining to homologous recombination (HR) repair. We report our mono-institutional experience in genetic counseling and SGT for 54 GC patients, with the detection of nine pathogenic variants (PVs) (9/54:16.7%). Seven out of fifty (14%) patients who underwent SGT for unknown mutations were carriers of a PV in CDH1 (n = 3), BRCA2 (n = 2), BRCA1 (n = 1), and MSH2 (n = 1), while one patient (2%) carried two variants of unknown significance (VUSs). CDH1 and MSH2 emerged as genes involved in early-onset diffuse and later-onset intestinal GCs, respectively. We additionally conducted MGPT on 37 patients, identifying five PVs (13.5%), including three (3/5:60%) in an HR gene (BRCA2, ATM, RAD51D) and at least one VUS in 13 patients (35.1%). Comparing PV carriers and non-carriers, we observed a statistically significant difference in PVs between patients with and without family history of GC (p-value: 0.045) or Lynch-related tumors (p-value: 0.036). Genetic counseling remains central to GC risk assessment. MGPT appeared advantageous in patients with unspecific phenotypes, although it led to challenging results. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 1028 KiB  
Review
Endoscopic Surveillance and Treatment of Upper GI Tract Lesions in Patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis—A New Perspective on an Old Disease
by Jacek Paszkowski, Paweł Samborski, Marcin Kucharski, Jarosław Cwaliński, Tomasz Banasiewicz and Andrzej Pławski
Genes 2022, 13(12), 2329; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122329 - 10 Dec 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4419
Abstract
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant disease caused by a germline mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene. Patients with FAP develop up to thousands of colorectal adenomas as well as lesions in the upper GI tract. In [...] Read more.
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant disease caused by a germline mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene. Patients with FAP develop up to thousands of colorectal adenomas as well as lesions in the upper GI tract. In FAP, the upper digestive lesions include gastric fundic gland polyps (FGPs), antrum adenomas, duodenal or small intestinal adenomas, and carcinoma. Patients, after colectomy, are still at significant risk for extracolonic malignancies. Advances in endoscope resolution and optical enhancement technologies allow endoscopists to provide assessments of benign and malignant polyps. For this reason, in the past decades, endoscopic resection techniques have become the first line of treatment in patients with polyps in the upper GI, whereby polyps and even early cancers can be successfully cured. In FAP patients, endoscopic ampullectomy appears to be a safe and effective way of treating patients with ampullary tumors. According to current indications, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and stenting of the main pancreatic duct follow ampullectomy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Predispositions to Tumors of the Digestive System)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2249 KiB  
Systematic Review
Dietary Polyphenol Intake and Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Marcela de Araújo Fagundes, Alex Richard Costa Silva, Gisele Aparecida Fernandes and Maria Paula Curado
Cancers 2022, 14(23), 5878; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235878 - 29 Nov 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4707
Abstract
Background: Phenolic compound consumption may have a protective effect against gastric cancer (GC). Most GC studies focus on the flavonoids class, but results are conflicting and knowledge gaps remain for other classes and total polyphenol intake. This study aimed to assess the association [...] Read more.
Background: Phenolic compound consumption may have a protective effect against gastric cancer (GC). Most GC studies focus on the flavonoids class, but results are conflicting and knowledge gaps remain for other classes and total polyphenol intake. This study aimed to assess the association between polyphenol intake (total, flavonoids, and other classes) and GC. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science, and OpenGrey databases were searched for studies published up to 20 March 2022. Case–control and cohort studies analyzing the association between polyphenol intake and GC were included. For the meta-analysis, pooled summary estimates were calculated using a random-effects model, and the estimates extracted adjusted for most variables. Subgroup analyses were performed for subclass (e.g., flavonoids and other classes), sex, geographical area, study design, anatomical subtype, histological subtype, family history of GC and fruit and/or vegetable intake. The study was registered with PROSPERO (#CRD42022306014). Findings: The search identified 2752 records, of which 19 studies published during the period 1999–2021 including a total of 1,197,857 subjects were eligible. Polyphenol consumption reduced GC risk by 29% (RR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.62–0.81; I2 = 60.5%); while flavonoid intake decreased GC risk by 28% (RR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61–0.85; I2 = 64.3%), similar to the reduction fort other classes (RR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.54–0.79; I2 = 72.0%). Protective effects against GC were observed in both sexes (male, RR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.67–0.94, I2 = 31.6%; female, RR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.48–0.87, I2 = 49.7%) and for intestinal subtype (RR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.52–0.82, I2 = 0.0%). By continent, polyphenol consumption reduced GC risk in both Europe (RR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.57–0.79, I2 = 44.2%) and Asia (RR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.51–0.89, I2 = 60.7%). Conclusions: Dietary polyphenol intake decreased GC risk. The reduction was greatest in females. Most previous studies were carried out in Europe and Asia. Further studies investigating polyphenol consumption and GC in Latin American populations are warranted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer and Nutrients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 297 KiB  
Article
Frequency of Positive Familial Criteria in Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Esophageal-Gastric Junction and Stomach: First Prospective Data in a Caucasian Cohort
by Jan Schölzchen, Christoph Treese, Peter Thuss-Patience, Alicja Mrózek, Beate Rau, Hendrik Seeliger, Dirk Hartmann, Lope Estevéz-Schwarz, Britta Siegmund, Denise Horn, Mani Nassir and Severin Daum
Cancers 2022, 14(15), 3590; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153590 - 23 Jul 2022
Viewed by 1563
Abstract
Objectives: Current prospective studies investigating the frequency of hereditary criteria in a Caucasian population for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) and stomach (GC) are missing. Genetic testing criteria (screening criteria) for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) were updated in 2020, but do [...] Read more.
Objectives: Current prospective studies investigating the frequency of hereditary criteria in a Caucasian population for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) and stomach (GC) are missing. Genetic testing criteria (screening criteria) for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) were updated in 2020, but do not address patients with intestinal histology (familial intestinal gastric cancer FIGC). Thus, we prospectively screened patients residing in Berlin newly diagnosed with AEG or GC for hereditary criteria to gain insights into the frequency of HDGC. Methods: Prospective documentation of familial/clinical parameters in patients residing in Berlin with AEG or GC over three years was conducted. Besides HDGC criteria from 2015 and revised 2020, we also documented patients fulfilling these criteria but with intestinal type gastric cancer (FIGC). Statistical analysis was performed using X2-test. Results: One hundred fifty-three patients were finally included (92 GC; male: 50 (n.s.); 61 AEG; male: 47; p = 0.007). Hereditary criteria for HDGC were detected in 9/92 (9.8%) (2015 criteria) and in 14/92 (15.2%) (2020 criteria) of GC patients (AEG: 2015 criteria 3/61 (4.9%) versus 4/61 according to 2020 criteria (6.5%)). Patients fulfilling hereditary criteria but with intestinal histology (FIGC) increased from 8.7% (2015) to 14.1%, respectively (2020) (AEG: 3.2% (2015) versus 6.6% (2020)). Hereditary criteria including intestinal histology were found in 29.3% (GC) and 13.1% (AEG) (p = 0.03) according to the 2020 criteria. Conclusions: HDGC criteria were found in 15.2% of GC patients according to the 2020 criteria. Percentage increased to 29.3% including patients with intestinal histology among the GC group, and was 13.1% in cases with AEG. These data indicate that family history seems to be of utmost importance in GC to further detect potential hereditary genetic risks. This equally applies for patients with intestinal subtype GC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 607 KiB  
Commentary
Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer—Update Based on the Current Consort Recommendations
by Christoph Treese, Britta Siegmund and Severin Daum
Curr. Oncol. 2022, 29(4), 2454-2460; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29040199 - 30 Mar 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4077
Abstract
Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is an autosomal dominant inherited cancer syndrome that has been associated with a mutation of the CDH1, and rarely the CTNNA1 gene, respectively. HDGC is characterized histologically by multifocal growth and signet ring cells in the gastric [...] Read more.
Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is an autosomal dominant inherited cancer syndrome that has been associated with a mutation of the CDH1, and rarely the CTNNA1 gene, respectively. HDGC is characterized histologically by multifocal growth and signet ring cells in the gastric mucosa and lobular type breast cancer. In cases of a proven pathogenic CDH1 mutation, a prophylactic gastrectomy, or alternatively, an annual surveillance gastroscopy in expert centers is recommended. Additionally, MR imaging of the breast should be performed annually starting from the age of 30, to detect lobular breast cancer. In 2020, the International Gastric Cancer Linkage Consortium (IGCLC) additionally defined new clinical groups with specific recommendations: (1) the group of patients with a proven mutation in the CDH1 gene, but exclusive manifestation as lobular breast cancer, was defined as hereditary lobular breast cancer (HLBC); (2) the group, which clinically fulfills familial HDGC criteria, in the absence of a relevant mutation, was designated as HDGC-like. This update summarizes relevant aspects of hereditary gastric cancer and the current recommendation criteria of the IGCLC published in 2020. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1904 KiB  
Article
Family History and Gastric Cancer Risk: A Pooled Investigation in the Stomach Cancer Pooling (STOP) Project Consortium
by Facundo Vitelli-Storelli, María Rubín-García, Claudio Pelucchi, Yolanda Benavente, Rossella Bonzi, Matteo Rota, Domenico Palli, Monica Ferraroni, Nuno Lunet, Samantha Morais, Weimin Ye, Amelie Plymoth, Reza Malekzadeh, Shoichiro Tsugane, Akihisa Hidaka, Nuria Aragonés, Gemma Castaño-Vinyals, David Georgievich Zaridze, Dmitry Maximovich, Jesus Vioque, Manuela García-de-la-Hera, Zuo-Feng Zhang, Gerson Shigueaki Hamada, Mohammadreza Pakseresht, Farhad Pourfarzi, Lina Mu, Stefania Boccia, Roberta Pastorino, Guo-Pei Yu, Areti Lagiou, Pagona Lagiou, Eva Negri, Carlo La Vecchia and Vicente Martínadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2021, 13(15), 3844; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153844 - 30 Jul 2021
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 4819
Abstract
Although there is a clear relationship between family history (FH) and the risk of gastric cancer (GC), quantification is still needed in relation to different histological types and anatomical sites, and in strata of covariates. The objective was to analyze the risk of [...] Read more.
Although there is a clear relationship between family history (FH) and the risk of gastric cancer (GC), quantification is still needed in relation to different histological types and anatomical sites, and in strata of covariates. The objective was to analyze the risk of GC according to first-degree FH in a uniquely large epidemiological consortium of GC. This investigation includes 5946 cases and 12,776 controls from 17 studies of the Stomach Cancer Pooling (StoP) Project consortium. Summary odds ratios (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by pooling study-specific ORs using fixed-effect model meta-analysis techniques. Stratified analyses were carried out by sex, age, tumor location and histological type, smoking habit, socioeconomic status, alcohol intake and fruit consumption. The pooled OR for GC was 1.84 (95% CI: 1.64–2.04; I2 = 6.1%, P heterogeneity = 0.383) in subjects with vs. those without first-degree relatives with GC. No significant differences were observed among subgroups of sex, age, geographic area or study period. Associations tended to be stronger for non-cardia (OR = 1.82; 95% CI: 1.59–2.05 for subjects with FH) than for cardia GC (OR = 1.38; 95% CI: 0.98–1.77), and for the intestinal (OR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.62–2.23) than for the diffuse histotype (OR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.28–1.96). This analysis confirms the effect of FH on the risk of GC, reporting an approximately doubled risk, and provides further quantification of the risk of GC according to the subsite and histotype. Considering these findings, accounting for the presence of FH to carry out correct prevention and diagnosis measures is of the utmost importance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 10667 KiB  
Article
The Transition from Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia to Gastric Cancer Involves POPDC1 and POPDC3 Downregulation
by Rachel Gingold-Belfer, Gania Kessler-Icekson, Sara Morgenstern, Lea Rath-Wolfson, Romy Zemel, Doron Boltin, Zohar Levi and Michal Herman-Edelstein
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(10), 5359; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105359 - 19 May 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3494
Abstract
Intestinal metaplasia (IM) is an intermediate step in the progression from premalignant to malignant stages of gastric cancer (GC). The Popeye domain containing (POPDC) gene family encodes three transmembrane proteins, POPDC1, POPDC2, and POPDC3, initially described in muscles and later in [...] Read more.
Intestinal metaplasia (IM) is an intermediate step in the progression from premalignant to malignant stages of gastric cancer (GC). The Popeye domain containing (POPDC) gene family encodes three transmembrane proteins, POPDC1, POPDC2, and POPDC3, initially described in muscles and later in epithelial and other cells, where they function in cell–cell interaction, and cell migration. POPDC1 and POPDC3 downregulation was described in several tumors, including colon and gastric cancers. We questioned whether IM-to-GC transition involves POPDC gene dysregulation. Gastric endoscopic biopsies of normal, IM, and GC patients were examined for expression levels of POPDC1-3 and several suggested IM biomarkers, using immunohistochemistry and qPCR. Immunostaining indicated lower POPDC1 and POPDC3 labeling in IM compared with normal tissues. Significantly lower POPDC1 and POPDC3 mRNA levels were measured in IM and GC biopsies and in GC-derived cell lines. The reduction in focal IM was smaller than in extensive IM that resembled GC tissues. POPDC1 and POPDC3 transcript levels were highly correlated with each other and inversely correlated with LGR5, OLFM4, CDX2, and several mucin transcripts. The association of POPDC1 and POPDC3 downregulation with IM-to-GC transition implicates a role in tumor suppression and highlights them as potential biomarkers for GC progression and prospective treatment targets. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 7341 KiB  
Article
Molecular Network Profiling in Intestinal- and Diffuse-Type Gastric Cancer
by Shihori Tanabe, Sabina Quader, Ryuichi Ono, Horacio Cabral, Kazuhiko Aoyagi, Akihiko Hirose, Hiroshi Yokozaki and Hiroki Sasaki
Cancers 2020, 12(12), 3833; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123833 - 18 Dec 2020
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 4947
Abstract
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays an important role in the acquisition of cancer stem cell (CSC) feature and drug resistance, which are the main hallmarks of cancer malignancy. Although previous findings have shown that several signaling pathways are activated in cancer progression, the precise [...] Read more.
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays an important role in the acquisition of cancer stem cell (CSC) feature and drug resistance, which are the main hallmarks of cancer malignancy. Although previous findings have shown that several signaling pathways are activated in cancer progression, the precise mechanism of signaling pathways in EMT and CSCs are not fully understood. In this study, we focused on the intestinal and diffuse-type gastric cancer (GC) and analyzed the gene expression of public RNAseq data to understand the molecular pathway regulation in different subtypes of gastric cancer. Network pathway analysis was performed by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). A total of 2815 probe set IDs were significantly different between intestinal- and diffuse-type GC data in cBioPortal Cancer Genomics. Our analysis uncovered 10 genes including male-specific lethal 3 homolog (Drosophila) pseudogene 1 (MSL3P1), CDC28 protein kinase regulatory subunit 1B (CKS1B), DEAD-box helicase 27 (DDX27), golgi to ER traffic protein 4 (GET4), chromosome segregation 1 like (CSE1L), translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 34 (TOMM34), YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA binding protein 1 (YTHDF1), ribonucleic acid export 1 (RAE1), par-6 family cell polarity regulator beta (PARD6B), and MRG domain binding protein (MRGBP), which have differences in gene expression between intestinal- and diffuse-type GC. A total of 463 direct relationships with three molecules (MYC, NTRK1, UBE2M) were found in the biomarker-filtered network generated by network pathway analysis. The networks and features in intestinal- and diffuse-type GC have been investigated and profiled in bioinformatics. Our results revealed the signaling pathway networks in intestinal- and diffuse-type GC, bringing new light for the elucidation of drug resistance mechanisms in CSCs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gene Expression and Molecular Profiling of Human Cancer Stem Cells)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 4714 KiB  
Article
Toxicity, Pharmacokinetics, and Gut Microbiome of Oral Administration of Sesterterpene MHO7 Derived from a Marine Fungus
by Wei Tian, Liang Yang, Di Wu, Zixin Deng and Kui Hong
Mar. Drugs 2019, 17(12), 667; https://doi.org/10.3390/md17120667 - 26 Nov 2019
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3670
Abstract
Sesterterpene MHO7 derived from mangrove fungus is a novel estrogen receptor degrader for the treatment of breast cancer. To explore its safety and pharmacokinetics in vivo, Log P/D values, stability in simulated gastric/intestinal (SGF/SIF), toxicity, and pharmacokinetics studies were carried mainly by liquid [...] Read more.
Sesterterpene MHO7 derived from mangrove fungus is a novel estrogen receptor degrader for the treatment of breast cancer. To explore its safety and pharmacokinetics in vivo, Log P/D values, stability in simulated gastric/intestinal (SGF/SIF), toxicity, and pharmacokinetics studies were carried mainly by liquid chromatography technique coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) method in mice, and the effect of MHO7 on mice gut microbiota at different time points was revealed by 16S rRNA sequencing. Log P/D values ranged 0.93–2.48, and the compound in SGF and SIF is stable under the concentration of 5 mM·L−1. The maximum tolerance dose (MTD) of oral administration in mice was 2400 mg·kg−1. The main pharmacokinetics parameters were as following: Cmax of 1.38 μg·mL−1, Tmax of 8 h, a half-life (t1/2) of 6.97 h, an apparent volume of mean residual time (MRT) of 8.76 h, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 10.50 h·μg·mL−1. MHO7 displayed a wide tissue distribution in mice, with most of the compound in liver (3.01 ± 1.53 μg·g−1) at 1 h, then in fat (5.20 ± 3.47 μg·g−1) at 4 h, and followed by reproductive organs with the concentrations of 23.90 ± 11.33 μg·g−1,13.69 ± 10.29 μg·g−1, 1.46 ± 1.23 μg·g−1, and 0.36 ± 0.46 μg·g−1 at 8, 12, 20 and 30 h, respectively. The most influenced genera of gut microbiome belonged to phylum Firmicutes (21 of 28), among which 18 genera originated from the order Clostridiales, class Clostridia, and families of Ruminococcaceae (11 of 18) and Lachnospiraceae (4 of 18). These results provide that MHO7 is suitable for oral administration in the treatment of breast cancer with the target organs of reproductive organs and regulation on Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacokinetic Research of Marine Drugs)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop