Search Results (58)

Background/Objectives: Biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) is one of the minimally invasive spine surgery techniques. BESS has several advantages, such as better visualization, less muscle injury, early rehabilitation, etc. Due to its clear visualization, delicate intraoperative hemostasis of the bleeding foci, including cancellous bone and small epidural vessels, can be achieved. Therefore, some authors have reported that BESS resulted in less intraoperative visible blood loss (VBL) compared to conventional open surgery. However, it is difficult to analyze the exact amount of intraoperative blood loss because of the continuous normal saline irrigation. In addition, hidden blood loss (HBL) tends to be overlooked, and the amount of HBL might be larger than expected. We aim to calculate the amount of HBL during BESS and to compare our findings with convention open surgery. Methods: We retrospectively obtained the clinical data of patients that underwent lumbar central decompression from July 2021 to June 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: the BESS group that underwent biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression, and the open surgery group that underwent open decompression. Both groups used unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression techniques. Total blood loss (TBL) using preoperative and postoperative change in hematocrit (Hct) was measured using Gross’s formula and the Nadler equation. Since TBL consists of VBL and HBL, HBL was calculated by subtracting the VBL measured intraoperatively from TBL. Results: A total of sixty-six patients in the BESS group and seventeen patients in the open surgery group were included in the study. The TBL was 247.16 ± 346.88 mL in the BESS group and 298.71 ± 256.65 mL in the open surgery group, without significant difference (p = 0.569). The calculated HBL values were 149.44 ± 344.08 mL in the BESS group and 171.42 ± 243.93 mL in the open surgery group. The HBL in the BESS group was lower than the HBL in the open surgery group, without significant difference (p = 0.764). Conclusions: The TBL and HBL during lumbar central decompression were smaller in patients who underwent BESS compared to those who underwent open surgery. While TBL was significantly lower in BESS, HBL did not show statistical significance between the two groups. HBL during BESS should not be neglected, and related hemodynamics should be considered postoperatively. Full article

Full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) offers an ultra-minimally invasive solution for addressing many different degenerative spine pathologies. While FESS has demonstrated strong evidence for faster recovery, reduced hospital stays, fewer complications, and potentially lower overall costs, FESS remains underutilized in low-income countries (LICs). This narrative review synthesizes the existing literature to evaluate access to FESS in LICs, highlighting challenges such as a lack of trained neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons, insufficient access to specialized equipment, capital costs, and limited representation in research. A systematic literature search identified only a handful of relevant studies, underscoring the scarcity of data on FESS in LICs. Findings reveal stark disparities in training opportunities and equipment availability, with less than 25% of LIC facilities equipped with the essential tools. This review advocates for international collaboration, increased funding, cost reduction, and targeted research to bridge these gaps. Innovative solutions such as virtual training platforms may help overcome current limitations. Addressing these challenges is essential to leveraging FESS’s potential to mitigate the burden of spinal disorders in LICs and advance global health equity. Full article

Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) has traditionally been employed for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Recent innovations in surgical methods and technologies have expanded its range to address other spinal pathologies, providing minimally invasive solutions with potential clinical benefits. Our review aims to summarize the applications, clinical outcomes, and limitations of ESS beyond LDH, focusing on its role in complex spinal conditions such as stenosis, thoracic disc herniation, spinal tumors, synovial cysts, and failed back surgery syndrome. A thorough review of the literature was conducted to assess and summarize the current evidence regarding ESS applications for spinal conditions beyond LDH surgery. Areas of focus included innovations in technology and technique, as well as comparisons with conventional open surgical methods. ESS shows notable potential across different spinal conditions by providing minimally invasive alternatives to traditional open surgery. Its use could be associated with reduced surgical morbidity, shorter recovery times, and improved patient outcomes. In particular, ESS is versatile in addressing both degenerative and neoplastic conditions of the spine. Despite this, challenges such as technical complexity, steep learning curves, and limited indications for certain pathologies remain as barriers to wider adoption. ESS is evolving in spine surgery, extending its utility beyond LDH surgery. While the current evidence largely supports its clinical efficacy, further studies are needed to address the present limitations and optimize its application. Future developments in surgical training and technology will likely enhance its adoption and broaden its clinical indications. Full article

Background/Objectives: One of the surgical treatments for lumbar foraminal stenosis, full endoscopic foraminotomy, is known for its numerous advantages and favourable clinical outcomes. While previous studies have analyzed preoperative radiological risk factors associated with recurrence within one year after endoscopic foraminal decompression, no research has investigated postoperative radiological changes. The aim of this study is to analyze the radiological changes occurring in cases of early recurrence within six months after endoscopic foraminal decompression. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients with unilateral lumbar foraminal stenosis who underwent full endoscopic foraminotomy at a single institution. The study included 11 recurrent patients who initially experienced symptomatic improvement and sufficient neural decompression on radiological evaluation, but exhibited recurrent radicular pain and radiological restenosis within six months postoperatively. Additionally, 33 control patients with favourable clinical outcomes and no evidence of restenosis were analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative plain X-ray imaging was used to evaluate sagittal and coronal parameters reflecting spinal anatomical characteristics, including disc height, foraminal height, disc wedging, coronal Cobb’s angle, total lumbar lordosis angle, segmental lumbar lordosis angle, and dynamic segmental lumbar lordosis angle. The study aimed to analyze postoperative changes in these parameters between the recurrent and control groups. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, sex distribution, presence of adjacent segment disease, or existence of Grade 1 spondylolisthesis. Analysis of preoperative and postoperative radiological changes revealed that, in the recurrent group, disc height and foraminal height showed a significant decrease postoperatively, while disc wedging and the coronal Cobb’s angle demonstrated a significant increase. In contrast, the control group exhibited a significant postoperative increase in the total lumbar lordosis angle and segmental lumbar lordosis angle. Conclusions: Progressive worsening of disc wedging and the coronal Cobb’s angle, and reductions in disc and foraminal height, along with minimal improvement in lumbar lordosis following TELF, suggest the presence of irreversible preoperative degenerative changes. Careful radiologic assessment and close postoperative monitoring are essential to identify patients at risk of early recurrence. Full article

Background/Objectives: Lumbar spine surgery has undergone significant technological transformation in recent years, driven by the goals of minimizing invasiveness, improving precision, and enhancing clinical outcomes. Emerging tools—including robotics, augmented reality, computer-assisted navigation, and artificial intelligence—have complemented the evolution of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches, such as endoscopic and lateral interbody fusions. Methods: This systematic review evaluates the literature from February 2020 to February 2025 on technological and procedural innovations in LSS. Eligible studies focused on degenerative lumbar pathologies, advanced surgical technologies, and reported clinical or perioperative outcomes. Randomized controlled trials, comparative studies, meta-analyses, and large case series were included. Results: A total of 32 studies met the inclusion criteria. Robotic-assisted surgery demonstrated high accuracy in pedicle screw placement (~92–94%) and reduced intraoperative blood loss and radiation exposure, although long-term clinical outcomes were comparable to conventional techniques. Intraoperative navigation improved instrumentation precision, while AR enhanced ergonomic workflow and reduced surgeon distraction. AI tools showed promise in surgical planning, guidance, and outcome prediction but lacked definitive evidence of clinical superiority. MIS techniques—including endoscopic discectomy and MIS-TLIF—offered reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery, with equivalent pain relief, fusion rates, and complication profiles compared to open procedures. Lateral and oblique approaches (XLIF/OLIF) further optimized alignment and indirect decompression, with favorable perioperative metrics. Conclusions: Recent innovations in lumbar spine surgery have enhanced technical precision and perioperative efficiency without compromising patient outcomes. While short-term benefits are clear, long-term clinical advantages and cost-effectiveness require further investigation. Integration of robotics, navigation, AI, and MIS into spine surgery reflects an ongoing shift toward personalized, data-driven, and less invasive care. Full article

Background/Objectives: This is a retrospective study. We aimed to identify an optimal biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) technique that maximizes facet joint preservation while achieving sufficient decompression for central to extraforaminal lumbar stenosis across all spinal levels. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 46 patients who underwent surgery and assessed clinical outcomes (visual analogue scale scores for pain; pregabalin usage) and radiological changes (using computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging) in the spinal canal; intervertebral foramen area expansion; facet joint preservation; and degenerative change. Results: Using interlaminar and transforaminal approaches (two-way BESS decompression technique), the mean facet joint volume preservation ratio was 87%, and the mean facet joint length maintenance ratio was 90%, indicating a successful anatomical preservation compared with previous studies. Radiological outcomes revealed effective decompression (178% in the spinal canal; 245% in intervertebral foramen expansion). Additionally, all clinical outcome parameters significantly improved (p < 0.001). Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to accurately estimate the degree of facet joint preservation using different methods after endoscopic surgery. The two-way BESS decompression technique maximized facet joint preservation with sufficient decompression and clinically improved central to extraforaminal stenosis across all lumbar levels. Therefore, this technique can sufficiently preserve facet joints to prevent rapid degenerative change after surgery. Full article

Objective: The totally endoscopic approach is on the rise to become the new standard in mitral valve surgery. The aim of this study was to develop a morphometric measurement tool for educational purposes to predict operability with low conversion and high repair rates. Methods: From January 2020 to March 2023, 64 patients underwent totally endoscopic mitral valve repair (TE-MVR). Of these, 15 patients were deemed to be unsuitable for TE-MVR due to narrow space and/or anticipated complex repair techniques and underwent repair through sternotomy (MVR-open). Angio-CT scanning was performed for preoperative planning and measurements of the following: the distance between the sternum and the spine (DSS), the distance between the skin incision and the anterior anulus of the mitral valve (DNM) and the intercostal space at the level of the skin incision (ICS). Results: The repair rate for all patients was 98.7%. In the TE-MVR group, the conversion rate to sternotomy was 3.1%. The 30-day survival was 100%. The DSS was 130.4 ± 18.8 mm and 108.1 ± 17.3 mm, and the DSM 70.7 ± 12.1 mm and 58.5 ± 13.6 mm in the TE-MVR and MVR-open, respectively (p < 0.001). Twenty-one TE-MVR patients were found to be technically demanding due to friction and less freedom to move the instruments. The composite morphometric parameter DSS plus 4xICS minus DNM was 53.3, 39.8 and 25.6 for TE-TMReasy, TE-TMRdemanding and MVR-open, respectively (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01). Conclusions: Surgical skills and a long history of expertise are mandatory to achieve excellent results with a low conversion and high repair rate. The composite morphometric parameter may be an easy tool for educational demands to predict the ease and feasibility of TE-MVR. Full article

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) remains a predominant cause of debilitating back and leg pain, affecting many aging populations. Traditional decompression surgeries can be invasive and pose significant risks and recovery time. This study elucidates the techniques and preliminary outcomes of endoscopic transfacet decompression in treating severe LSS. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 65 patients with severe LSS who underwent endoscopic transfacet decompression. The patient outcomes were analyzed using the VAS for leg pain and the modified Macnab criteria. Pre-operative and post-operative scores were compared, and any complications were analyzed. An online survey was administered to 868 surgeons using Likert-scale ratings to evaluate surgeons’ experience with endoscopic decompression in patients with painful spondylolisthesis. The survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Polytomous Rasch analysis to evaluate surgeon endorsement. Results: The study included 65 patients, of which 29 (44.6%) were female and 36 (55.4%) were male, with a mean age of 65.79 ranging from 38 to 84 years. The available mean post-operative follow-up period was 31.44 months, ranging from 24 to 39 months. The VAS score for leg pain reduced significantly from pre-operative 7.54 ± 1.67 to 2.20 ± 1.45 by 5.34 ± 2.03 (p < 0.001) with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 2.626). At the final follow-up, functional Macnab outcomes were reported as excellent by 20 (30.8%), good by 37 (56.9%), fair by 5 (7.7%), and poor by 3 (4.6%) of patients. There were no incidental durotomies, nerve root injuries, wound complications, or instances of post-operative instability. Only five patients (7.7%) developed post-operative dysesthesia. Incomplete decompression led to fair and poor outcomes in 8 (12.3%) patients. No revision surgeries were performed. post-operative instability was not observed. The surgeon survey corroborated these observations, where the polytomous Rasch analysis showed consensus on the effectiveness of the percutaneous endoscopic decompression of low-grade spondylolisthesis. Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis showed no significant bias in item responses between orthopaedic and neurosurgeons. Conclusions: The endoscopic transfacet decompression technique delineated herein showcased excellent Macnab outcomes in managing severe LSS, with a combined success rate of 87.7%. Patients also experienced a statistically significant reduction in leg pain. Dysesthesia rates were lower than with the transforaminal approach, likely because of limited exiting and traversing nerve root manipulation. This technique might represent a viable, less invasive alternative to open microsurgical dissection and decompression for patients with severe LSS, where fusion may be required. This approach was found to be highly accepted among endoscopic spine surgeons. Full article

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (sDAVFs) are rather uncommon lesions of the spine. In sDAVFs, which represent the most frequent form of vascular malformations of the spine, operative treatment remains the most common treatment modality. In operative surgery, visualization and pathology detection have a key impact on the results of the neurosurgical treatment of an sDAVF. The exoscope is one of the most recent imaging devices developed alongside the microscope and endoscope. The exoscope is being increasingly applied in neurosurgical procedures as an alternative to operative microscopes due to various advantages, such as its non-space-occupying camera, excellent visualization of the anatomical details and the perfect teaching possibilities it thus provides. In this publication, we present our experience in the treatment of a patient with an sDAVF, where surgery was performed exclusively with an ORBEYE-exoscope for the entire duration of the procedure. This report outlines the workflow and some of the technical pitfalls involved in managing this vascular pathology using the exoscopic technique. Full article

Background/Objectives: This study compares clinical and radiological outcomes of open microscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) and biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) PCF in multi-level cases. While BESS PCF is effective in single-level surgeries, its role in multi-level procedures remains unclear. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 60 patients treated for cervical radiculopathy from 2016 to 2023, divided into two groups, open microscopic PCF (Group M, n = 30) and BESS PCF (Group B, n = 30). Clinical outcomes were assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain and the neck disability index (NDI). Radiological parameters included cervical angle, segmental angle, range of motion (ROM), and the extent of facetectomy. Results: Both groups showed improvement in the arm pain VAS and the NDI. However, Group B exhibited significantly better neck pain on the VAS at the final follow-up (p = 0.03). Radiologically, Group B maintained lordotic cervical and segmental angles postoperatively, while Group M showed kyphotic changes (p < 0.01). Segmental ROM was larger in Group M, indicating greater instability (p < 0.01). Group B had less extensive facetectomy while achieving comparable foraminal enlargement. Operative time was longer for Group B (p < 0.001). Conclusions: BESS PCF preserves cervical stability and reduces postoperative neck pain compared to open microscopic PCF in multi-level procedures. Despite longer operative times, its benefits in minimizing instability make it a promising option for treating multi-level cervical radiculopathy. Further research with long-term follow-up is recommended. Full article

This review aims to explore the evolution, techniques, and outcomes of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) within the field of neurosurgery. We sought to address the increasing burden of spine degeneration in a rapidly aging population and the need for optimizing surgical management. This review explores various techniques in MISS, drawing upon evidence from retrospective studies, case series, systematic reviews, and technological advancements in neurosurgical spine treatment. Various approaches, including endonasal cervical, transoral cervical, transcervical, mini-open/percutaneous, tubular, and endoscopic techniques, provide alternatives for current approaches to a range of spinal pathologies. The main findings of this review highlight potential advantages of MISS over traditional open surgery, including reduced complications, shorter hospital stays, and improved patient outcomes. Our research underscores the importance of adopting MISS techniques to optimize patient care in neurosurgical spine treatment. Full article

Spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks can be caused by tears in the dura and are challenging to treat. Traditional methods of treating spinal CSF leakage include nonsurgical management, epidural blood patches (EBP), and direct surgical repair. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is rapidly progressing within neurosurgery due to its advantages for patient safety and comfort. Existing MIS techniques to spine surgery utilize a rigid endoscope, which has limitations when reaching smaller areas requiring greater degrees of visualization. The simultaneous use of a flexible endoscope and wearable heads-up display (wHUD) improves access and visualization in these small areas while allowing the surgeon to maintain optimal ergonomics. In this article, we review minimally invasive approaches to spine surgery and the management of spinal CSF leaks. We also demonstrate a novel minimally invasive technique utilizing flexible endoscopy and a wHUD to treat a case of recurrent CSF leak. We describe the successful utilization of this technology and provide the groundwork for future practitioners to incorporate this approach into their practice. Full article

Biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) is minimally invasive and therefore benefits both surgeons and patients. However, concerning complications include dural tears and neural tissue injuries. In this study, we aimed to develop a deep learning model for neural tissue segmentation to enhance the safety and efficacy of endoscopic spinal surgery. We used frames extracted from videos of 28 endoscopic spine surgeries, comprising 2307 images for training and 635 images for validation. A U-Net-like architecture is employed for neural tissue segmentation. Quantitative assessments include the Dice-Sorensen coefficient, Jaccard index, precision, recall, average precision, and image-processing time. Our findings revealed that the best-performing model achieved a Dice-Sorensen coefficient of 0.824 and a Jaccard index of 0.701. The precision and recall values were 0.810 and 0.839, respectively, with an average precision of 0.890. The model processed images at 43 ms per frame, equating to 23.3 frames per second. Qualitative evaluations indicated the effective identification of neural tissue features. Our U-Net-based model robustly performed neural tissue segmentation, indicating its potential to support spine surgeons, especially those with less experience, and improve surgical outcomes in endoscopic procedures. Therefore, further advancements may enhance the clinical applicability of this technique. Full article

Background/Objectives: Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) under local anesthesia is a promising minimally invasive surgical option for intractable lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, our understanding of access pain prediction during foraminal pathological procedures is limited. To our knowledge, no predictive rules for access pain have been established during TELD for foraminal or extraforaminal LDH. This study, with its potential for predicting access pain during TELD and discussing strategies for pain prevention and management, could significantly benefit the field of endoscopic spine surgery. Methods: This observational study included 73 consecutive patients who underwent TELD for foraminal or extraforaminal LDH between January 2017 and December 2022. Preoperative clinical and radiographic factors affecting significant access pain and the impact of access pain on clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: The rate of significant access pain was 13.70% (10 of 73 patients). Extraforaminal LDH tended to cause more severe pain than did foraminal LDH during TELD under local anesthesia (p < 0.05). Although the degree of access pain was not related to global clinical outcomes, increased pain was strongly associated with prolonged operative time and length of hospital stay (p < 0.05). Conclusions: TELD could be an effective surgical option for foraminal or extraforaminal LDH under local anesthesia. More access pain might develop during TELD for extraforaminal LDH. The extraforaminal component of LDH could narrow the safe working zone. Significant access pain might prolong the duration of surgery and hospitalization. Thus, a specialized technique is required for the clinical success of TELD. Full article

The advent of ultra-minimally invasive endoscopic spine surgery, characterized by significantly reduced surgery times, minimal blood loss, and minimal tissue trauma, has precipitated a paradigm shift in the preoperative management of patients with cardiac disease undergoing elective spine procedures. This perspective article explores how these advancements have influenced the requirements for preoperative cardiac workups and the protocols surrounding the cessation of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies. Traditionally, extensive cardiac evaluations and the need to stop anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents have posed challenges, increasing the risk of cardiac events and delaying surgical interventions. However, the reduced invasiveness of endoscopic spine surgery presents a safer profile for patients with cardiac comorbidities, potentially minimizing the necessity for rigorous cardiac clearance and allowing for more flexible anticoagulation management. This perspective article synthesizes current research and clinical practices to provide a comprehensive overview of these evolving protocols. It also discusses the implications of these changes for patient safety, surgical outcomes, and overall healthcare efficiency. Finally, the article suggests directions for future research, emphasizing the need for updated guidelines that reflect the reduced perioperative risk associated with these innovative surgical techniques. This discussion is pivotal for primary care physicians, surgeons, cardiologists, and the broader medical community in optimizing care for this high-risk patient population. Full article