Search Results (61)

Herein we reply to the commentary of Cowman et al. on our Review of Coral Taxonomy, Evolution, and Diversity. We demonstrate that many of their central criticisms are mischaracterisations, contain factual errors, or extend beyond the evidentiary scope of available molecular datasets. Our Review did not dismiss the legitimacy or importance of molecular approaches, nor the value of integrative taxonomy. Rather, it emphasised the evidentiary thresholds required for formal species-level revision in morphologically variable and geographically widespread coral taxa. Genetic differentiation should not, without comprehensive sampling and contextualisation, be treated as sufficient grounds for immediate species-level restructuring. We reiterate that the concept of reticulate evolution in corals is supported by a growing body of molecular and other evidence. Furthermore, the “biological entities” discussed in our Review are not subjective impressions or non-reproducible opinions but are empirically documented, repeatedly recognisable, and diagnosable, characterised by coherent suites of morphological, ecological and geographic traits. These constitute structured, testable species hypotheses within an integrative framework. Our Reply addresses issues of field variability, type specimens, sampling design, molecular and morphological incongruence, and the taxonomic and conservation implications of premature rank assignment. Where multiple, independent lines of evidence converge, taxonomic revision is warranted; where sampling remains limited, geographically restricted, or analytically unstable, and where different lines of evidence conflict, nomenclatural stability and biological coherence are better served by restraint. Full article

Aquavoltaics, which integrates solar photovoltaic infrastructure with aquaculture production, has increasingly been promoted as a possible pathway for supporting low-carbon energy transition and multifunctional land use in coastal regions. In Taiwan, aquavoltaics has been framed as a policy approach that may contribute to renewable energy development, aquaculture continuity, and rural revitalisation. However, its implementation has also raised governance concerns related to land use, environmental uncertainty, and local participation in coastal aquaculture communities. This study examines the governance trade-offs and institutional development of aquavoltaics policy in southern Taiwan through an analytical framework that combines political ecology and the extended explanatory chain model (EECM). Drawing on policy document analysis, field observations, administrative records, and in-depth interviews with 24 stakeholders, the study traces aquavoltaics governance across five interrelated stages: policy discourse, institutional design, local implementation and community response, policy feedback, and institutional diffusion. The findings indicate that Taiwan’s aquavoltaics governance has been shaped by tensions between centralised energy-policy objectives and diverse local aquaculture conditions. Technical requirements, including the 40% shading threshold and the 70% production maintenance requirement, provide administrative clarity but may not fully reflect species-specific practices, pond-management needs, or existing land-tenure arrangements. In the cases examined, aquavoltaics development was associated with changes in land-use relations, spatial competition, and concerns over environmental uncertainty and governance legitimacy. The study also suggests that local stakeholders were not only recipients of top–down policy implementation but also participated in governance adjustment through review procedures, administrative negotiation, adaptive practices, and the mobilisation of local ecological knowledge. By integrating political ecology with the EECM, this study offers a process-oriented perspective for examining aquavoltaics as a socioecological governance issue rather than only a technical energy arrangement. The findings suggest that future aquavoltaics governance may benefit from more context-sensitive assessment, clearer institutional coordination, and greater attention to local knowledge and long-term monitoring. Full article

Southern Chinese lion dance (nanshi) in Bangkok moves between temple ritual, community representation, school training, public festival display, and judged competition. This article foregrounds the diasporic and minority position of Teochew lion dance in Thailand. It examines codification as cultural negotiation, asking how a temple-linked Chinese ritual practice is made legible to Thai educational, civic, and sporting publics while remaining tied to community ritual authority and lineage memory. The study draws on public documentary traces from the 2000s–2020s and field-based evidence centred on Bangkok. Sources include temple and association commemorative publications, municipal school records, Thai cultural and competition reporting, heritage registers, transnational rule texts, interviews, observations, and community archival/display materials. The article first shows how huiguan, temples, and schools stabilize calendars, resources, and authority; second, how competition rules translate embodied repertoires into auditable norms of time, team composition, safety, difficulty, and scoring; and third, how trophies, certificates, lion heads, photographs, videos, and anniversary volumes turn evaluated performances into community archives of continuity, merit, and public legitimacy. The Bangkok case shows a diasporic minority practice being reshaped through the combined work of ritual governance, competitive codification, and community archiving within a Teochew-centred institutional ecology. Full article

This paper addresses a persistent divide in water governance: critical frameworks reveal power dynamics and ontological diversity but lack operational guidance, while operational frameworks prioritize technical management at the expense of ontological plurality and social legitimacy. We introduce Water-Important Socioecological Systems (WISe) as a prescriptive framework that integrates political ontology with hydrosocial territory analysis to inform more reflexive and inclusive water governance. WISe designates specific zones where ecological functions for water sustainability are concentrated and where social practices, productive livelihoods, and symbolic meanings coexist inseparably with biophysical processes. Unlike Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM), which treats social and ecological dimensions as separate pillars, and the Ostrom Social-Ecological Systems framework, which undertheorizes ontological plurality, WISe explicitly centers the coexistence of multiple ways of understanding and relating to water as a governance principle. The framework was developed through a five-phase mixed-methods conceptual inquiry combining a systematic literature review (202 documents), an exploratory stakeholder survey of 223 participants across six Colombian hydrographic basins, and an analysis of designated water-strategic ecosystems. The findings reveal that ontological diversity is distributed across all stakeholder groups: hydrological supply framings predominate (36.4–45.8%), yet territorial-integrated perspectives appear in all groups, with government actors (22.9%) showing the highest proportion. The majority (56.1%) perceive WISe as exclusively state-managed, revealing a dominant ontological position that reduces socioecological territories to objects of administrative control. This article presents WISe as a conceptual and prescriptive framework informed by exploratory empirical evidence. Rather than offering a definitive empirical validation of the model, this study provides initial analytical grounding for its development and identifies indicative patterns that warrant further testing across other geographical and institutional contexts. WISe offers a framework comprising six defining characteristics and five operational dimensions that bridge theoretical understandings with governance-oriented analysis, treating ontological difference not as an obstacle but as essential knowledge for more reflexive and equitable water governance. Full article

School physical education (PE) has often relied on linear progressions in which teachers demonstrate, pupils practise prescribed techniques, and achievement is judged through visible reproduction of preferred movement forms. Non-linear pedagogy (NLP) and the constraints-led approach (CLA) offer an alternative ecological-dynamics rationale for supporting pupils’ integral development, including motor competence, adaptable movement capability, and dispositions for lifelong physical activity and physical literacy. However, existing review work has not sufficiently explained why principled NLP/CLA designs remain unevenly enacted across ordinary school PE systems. We conducted a theory-informed interpretive synthesis drawing on critical interpretive synthesis and thematic synthesis. A structured English-language search of ERIC, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, and Google Scholar (2010–2025) was combined with title-and-abstract screening, full-text assessment, backward and forward citation chaining, and purposive retention of foundational or Singapore-context records, and reporting was strengthened through PRISMA-like transparency aids adapted to interpretive synthesis. The final coded corpus comprised 36 included sources: 9 empirical studies, 3 reviews, 9 conceptual or practitioner texts, 6 theoretical or critical sources, 4 review-method papers, and 5 Singapore policy, context, or professional-learning documents used as an illustrative policy lens. Through iterative coding, descriptive theme development, and analytical integration, we identified six coherence domains shaping enactment: teacher beliefs and knowledge; curriculum and lesson structure; assessment and accountability; systemic and resource constraints; professional development ecosystems; and stakeholder and cultural factors. These domains informed a Systemic Coherence Framework spanning micro, meso, and macro levels. The synthesis suggests that assessment coherence may be a high-leverage condition because it links curriculum legitimacy, reporting, and teacher defensibility, but its comparative influence across domains remains a hypothesis for future empirical testing. The framework is offered as an analytic heuristic rather than a prescriptive model and is intended to help researchers, teacher educators, school leaders, and policy actors diagnose where curriculum intent, assessment language, professional learning, and organisational routines support or inhibit ecologically informed practice. Full article

Yacuri National Park (YNP) is a Ramsar site located within Ecuador’s Podocarpus-El Cóndor Biosphere Reserve. The Park faces critical threats from illegal mining, livestock grazing, wildfires and the harvesting of wax palms. This study employed participatory action research to co-design a Communication, Education and Public Engagement (CEPA) plan with park managers and local communities as equal partners. Moving beyond traditional, top-down information campaigns, the CEPA framework establishes a co-governance model that integrates indigenous knowledge with local socio-economic realities. The plan implements four targeted interventions: (1) strengthening community fire brigades (BRICOM); (2) promoting culturally appropriate alternatives to Holy Week wax palm harvesting; (3) establishing participatory waste management; and (4) engaging tourists as conservation allies through experiential learning. Strategic alliances with municipalities, universities, and civil society organizations provide institutional backing and secure resources, while a participatory monitoring system using SMART indicators tracks behavioral and ecological outcomes. Ultimately, the findings demonstrate that conserving culturally complex, biodiverse landscapes requires social legitimacy, environmental justice and equitable power-sharing. Recognizing local communities as co-managers is essential to ensuring the long-term protection of Andean ecosystems. Full article

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in how cities are governed, shaping decisions on mobility, land use, public services, and environmental management. Yet urban AI is predominantly governed through fragmented frameworks designed at national or corporate scales, offering limited guidance for municipal decision-making and overlooking place-specific social and ecological consequences. As the level of government closest to everyday urban life, cities are uniquely positioned to steer AI toward public value, but face persistent tensions between efficiency, equity, accountability, and sustainability. This paper argues that responsible urban AI cannot be governed through top-down or one-size-fits-all approaches. To address this, the study aims to conceptualise and advance a ground-up model of responsible urban AI governance that places cities and local governments at the centre of decision-making. It addresses the following research question: How can municipal authorities translate high-level ethical principles into practical, context-sensitive governance arrangements that respond to local capacities, risks, and public values? Drawing on global governance principles and illustrative city experiences, we propose a locally grounded, stage-based framework for municipal AI governance. The framework addresses institutional capacity gaps, fragmented responsibilities, and algorithmic externalities, advancing a participatory, place-sensitive, and adaptive model that aligns urban AI innovation with democratic legitimacy, social justice, and sustainable urban futures. Full article

This paper analyses seven project deliverables from the Interreg Euro-MED “MAST” project to examine its sustainability protocol as a sociotechnical boundary object facilitating ISO 21401:2018 adoption among Mediterranean tourism SMEs. Using Science and Technology Studies (STS) and boundary object theory, we conducted qualitative content analysis (QCA) to map how the protocol translates global standards into SME roadmaps addressing implementation costs, skill gaps, and legitimacy barriers. Results reveal a tension between managerial scripting (actionable tables and KPIs) and relational openings (peer learning and stakeholder prompts). While enabling SME access to certification, the protocol risks “smart compliance” by prioritising formal verification over substantive transformation. Universities emerge as key boundary brokers, potentially translating technical standards into entrepreneurial competencies and curricula. Limited to pre-implementation project documents, the analysis identifies discursive conditions under which standardised tools could support regenerative governance. Findings suggest university–SME partnerships as promising mechanisms for aligning certification with Mediterranean socio-ecological priorities, warranting empirical testing through SME implementation studies. Full article

While national agencies increasingly adopt ‘sustainable’ rhetoric, their policies frequently prioritize bureaucratic legitimacy over local landscape realities. This research examines how Thailand’s development policies shape water and spatial governance in riverine landscapes, focusing on Chiang Mai Province and the Phaya-Kham irrigation system. Despite ambitious sustainable development objectives, implementation is marked by institutional silos, overlapping mandates, and scalar misalignments, resulting in fragmented governance that favors short-term economic gains over long-term ecological health. These dynamics undermine water resource management and exacerbate socio-ecological inequalities. Drawing on archival reviews, policy analysis, mapping, and interviews, the study employs political ecology perspectives and David Mosse’s framework of policy performance to investigate the disjuncture between policy intentions and on-the-ground realities. The Phaya-Kham system illustrates how modernization pressures, urban expansion, and agricultural intensification destabilize community-based water governance. Findings underscore that governance challenges in Chiang Mai are fundamentally political, rooted in struggles over authority and resource control rather than technical shortcomings. Sustainability-oriented policy frameworks may reproduce socio-ecological degradation. Achieving fairer water and landscape governance requires confronting these dynamics, integrating local knowledge, and fostering inter-agency cooperation. By recognizing context-based hydrosocial territories, policies can move toward more socio-environmentally healthy frameworks supporting local riverine communities and landscape realities. Full article

The transformation of post-mining landscapes represents a critical challenge for structurally affected coal regions undergoing decarbonisation. This study examines land-use transformation in a former brown coal mining area in the north-west of the Czech Republic, focusing on the interplay between social legitimacy, territorial governance, and development trajectories. The research aims to assess (i) the level of public awareness of the transformation process, (ii) the alignment between residents’ and key local actors’ preferences regarding future land-use trajectories, and (iii) the acceptance of renewable energy as part of the area’s future development. The empirical analysis combines a CAWI survey of residents with structured CATI interviews conducted with local stakeholders. The findings reveal strong support for environmental and landscape restoration, alongside conditionally positive but more ambivalent attitudes towards renewable energy development. While ecological renewal is widely perceived as desirable, the long-term sustainability of the transformation process depends on social legitimacy, institutional trust, and the degree of alignment between strategic planning and local preferences. The results highlight that successful post-mining land-use transformation requires not only environmental and economic planning but also systematic engagement with social acceptance and territorially embedded governance. Full article

The Bees Quarter episode in Amish Tripathi’s Ram Chandra Series rearticulates dharma by relocating it from a transcendent cosmic mandate to a framework enacted through spatial and procedural ethics. Traditionally understood as a sustaining principle of moral and social order, dharma in Tripathi’s narrative is reconfigured through the spatial reorganization of Mithila, where environmental vulnerability and infrastructural design shape the conditions of ethical governance. Interpreting this transformation through the framework of just sustainabilities, the article argues that the episode reconfigures dharma not as a transcendent principle but as a practice grounded in resource equity, institutional responsibility, and the consistent application of law. The crisis surrounding the Battle of the Bees Quarter and Ram’s subsequent self-exile further dramatizes a dharmic dilemma between sovereign authority and procedural justice, foregrounding tensions between power and legitimacy. Read through this lens, Tripathi’s retelling situates dharma within contemporary debates on sustainability and justice, reframing it as a normative response to ecological precarity and institutional fragility. Full article

The rapid expansion of algorithmic systems has transformed cognition into an increasingly distributed and collective enterprise, giving rise to what can be described as cognitive assemblages, dynamic constellations of humans, institutions, data infrastructures, and artificial agents. This paper traces the historical and conceptual evolution that has led to this shift. First, we show how cognition, once conceived as the property of autonomous individuals, has progressively become embedded in socio-technical networks in which algorithmic processes participate as co-agents. Second, we revisit the progressive awareness of human cognitive limits, from bounded rationality to contemporary theories of extended mind. These frameworks anticipate and help explain today’s hybrid cognitive ecologies. Third, we assess the philosophical implications for Enlightenment ideals of autonomy, rationality, and self-governance, showing how these concepts must be reinterpreted in light of pervasive algorithmic intermediation. Finally, we examine global initiatives that seek to integrate augmented cognitive capacities into large-scale cybernetic forms of societal coordination, ranging from digital platforms and data spaces to AI-driven governance systems. These developments offer new opportunities for steering complex societies under conditions of globalization, environmental disruption, and the rise of autonomous intelligent systems, yet they also raise profound questions regarding control, accountability, and democratic legitimacy. We argue that understanding cognitive assemblages is essential to designing socio-technical systems capable of supporting collective intelligence while preserving human values in an era of accelerating complexity. Full article

Over the last three decades, architecture has undergone a sustained digital transformation that has progressively displaced the ontology of the geometric generator, understood here as the primary artefact through which form is produced, controlled, and legitimized. This paper argues that, within one extended digital epoch, three successive regimes have reconfigured architectural agency. First, a digital model regime, in which computer-generated 3D models become the main generators of geometry. Second, a parametric code regime, in which scripted relations and numerical parameters supersede the individual model as the core design object, defining a space of possibilities rather than a single instance. Third, an emerging latent regime, in which diffusion and transformer systems produce high plausibility synthetic images as image-first generators and subsequently impose a post hoc image-to-geometry translation requirement. To make this shifting paradigm comparable across time, the paper uses the blob as a stable morphological reference and develops a comparative reading of four blobs, Kiesler’s Endless House, Greg Lynn’s Embryological House, Marc Fornes’ Vaulted Willow, and an author-generated GenAI blob curated from a traceable AI image archive, to show how the geometric generator migrates from object, to model, to code, to latent image-space. As a pre-digital hinge case, Kiesler is selected not only for anticipating blob-like continuity, but for clarifying a recurrent disciplinary tension, “ form first generators” that precede tectonic and programmatic rationalization. The central hypothesis is that GenAI introduces an ontological shift not primarily at the level of style, but at the level of architectural judgement and evidentiary legitimacy. The project can begin with a predictive image that is visually convincing yet tectonically underdetermined. To name this condition, the paper proposes the plausibility gap, the mismatch between visual plausibility and tectonic intelligibility, as an operational criterion for evaluating image-first workflows, and for specifying the verification tasks required to stabilize them as architecture. Selection establishes evidentiary legitimacy, while a friction map and Gap Index externalize the translation pressure required to turn predictive imagery into accountable geometry, making the plausibility gap operational rather than merely asserted. The paper concludes by outlining implications for authorship, pedagogy, and disciplinary judgement in emerging multi-agent design ecologies. Full article

The socio-ecological transition requires not only technological innovation but also new ways of recognizing the social, environmental, and territorial value generated by collective action. Many of these positive externalities remain invisible in conventional assessment frameworks, limiting the legitimacy, financing, and scaling of local sustainability initiatives. This article presents a strategic framework designed to identify and structure positive externalities in collective self-consumption and other transformative projects. The method combines four components: (i) normative identification through the Sustainable Development Goals; (ii) balanced multi-stakeholder participation to surface diverse perspectives; (iii) perceptive mapping using an adapted Kano model; and (iv) strategic articulation. The framework was applied in two contrasting contexts: an energy community centered on shared renewable production, and a women’s empowerment program focused on capability-building and social innovation. These applications do not aim at empirical replication or the validation of results, but at examining how the framework supports collective recognition and strategic structuring in different organizational settings. Across these distinct settings, it led to the formulation of coherent and actionable strategic roadmaps, illustrating how positive externalities can inform governance choices, strengthen institutional legitimacy, and support long-term project consolidation. These results suggest that collective recognition enables externalities to structure strategic action beyond their original sector, demonstrating the potential transferability of the approach. Developed within a research program supported by the French Agency for Ecological Transition (ADEME) and the national urban-transition initiative (PUCA), the framework provides a practical decision architecture for structuring shared value within coordinated strategies. Full article

This article examines how the role of digital platforms is reshaping political communication and consensus-building in contemporary societies. It questions how algorithmic architectures are transforming the relationship between leadership, audiences, and power. Drawing on an empirical analysis of online interaction data, the study analyses Donald Trump’s political communication during the August 2025 summit with Putin in Alaska, presenting it as a paradigmatic example of networked leadership. The study focuses on the dynamics of mobilisation, polarisation, and identity construction within digital ecologies. The findings show that the leader’s centrality derives not only from traditional party structures, but also from the ability to coordinate heterogeneous communication flows as well as activate processes of affective and symbolic resonance. The article proposes a theoretical model that conceptualises Trump’s audience as a cognitive and emotional power device, highlighting the convergence of post-organisational populism, algorithmic mediatisation, and communicative governance. This leadership expresses forms of “algorithmic charisma” that redefine the modalities of political legitimacy. Methodologically, the study highlights the value of data-driven interpretive approaches, while also addressing their limitations related to algorithmic transparency and replicability. In conclusion, the article offers a critical reflection on emerging ecologies of consensus and the democratic implications of the ongoing “platformisation” of the public sphere. Full article