Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (63)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = diabetic foot osteomyelitis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 680 KB  
Article
Clinical Audit of Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix with Local Antibiotic Therapy for Refractory Diabetic Foot Ulcers: 12-Month Outcomes from a Single Centre
by Upamanyu Nath, Iulia Valeria Rusu and Anand Pillai
BioMed 2026, 6(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomed6010005 - 21 Jan 2026
Viewed by 188
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Diabetic Foot Ulceration (DFU) is one of the most debilitating and costly complications of diabetes mellitus, representing a significant cause of morbidity, disability, and healthcare burden worldwide. Refractory non-healing ulcers that fail to respond to conventional therapies require novel adjuvant treatment modalities. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Diabetic Foot Ulceration (DFU) is one of the most debilitating and costly complications of diabetes mellitus, representing a significant cause of morbidity, disability, and healthcare burden worldwide. Refractory non-healing ulcers that fail to respond to conventional therapies require novel adjuvant treatment modalities. This clinical audit aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of an autologous, bioactive platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) matrix combined with topical gentamicin in patients with chronic, non-healing DFUs. Methods: A retrospective observational audit was conducted, involving eleven patients with refractory DFUs who underwent adjunctive treatment with a PRF matrix (Arthrozheal®) and co-applied gentamicin. Patients were followed at three-week intervals using standardised wound imaging (Silhouette® 3D) to assess healing parameters. Long-term follow-up data, evaluating healing durability and complications, is presented. Results: All patients completed the treatment protocol, with significant reductions in mean wound area (87.9%), perimeter, depth, and volume (all p < 0.05). Epithelialised tissue increased from 24.7% to 82.8%. At 12 months, 81.8% of patients maintained complete ulcer healing. Two patients experienced complications: one ulcer recurrence requiring surgical debridement and one unrelated amputation due to osteomyelitis. Conclusions: The combination of autologous PRF matrix and gentamicin demonstrated promising results in promoting sustained healing of refractory DFUs with minimal complications. These findings support further investigation in larger, controlled studies to validate this biologic-antimicrobial approach as a safe, effective, and durable therapy for complex diabetic wounds. Full article
11 pages, 765 KB  
Article
Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Probe-to-Bone Test, Plain Radiography, and Serum Biomarkers in Detecting Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis
by María Herrera-Casamayor, Irene Sanz-Corbalán, Aroa Tardáguila-García, Mateo López-Moral, José Luis Lázaro-Martínez and Yolanda García-Álvarez
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(2), 500; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020500 - 8 Jan 2026
Viewed by 336
Abstract
Background/Objectives: diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a serious complication characterized by bone infection that can involve cortical structures, bone marrow, and surrounding soft tissues. Its prevalence ranges from 20% in moderate diabetic foot infections to over 50% in severe cases, making accurate diagnosis [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a serious complication characterized by bone infection that can involve cortical structures, bone marrow, and surrounding soft tissues. Its prevalence ranges from 20% in moderate diabetic foot infections to over 50% in severe cases, making accurate diagnosis essential in guiding timely and effective management. in this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy achieved by combining the probe-to-bone (PTB) test, plain radiography, and blood biomarkers—including the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP)—in the diagnosis of DFO. Methods: we conducted a diagnostic accuracy study involving 128 patients with diabetic foot ulcers and clinical suspicion of DFO. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for individual tests and for their diagnostic combinations. Results: the combination of PTB and biomarkers yielded a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 24%, a positive predictive value of 69%, and a negative predictive value of 29%. Similarly, the combination of PTB and plain radiography showed a sensitivity of 76%, a specificity of 23%, a positive predictive value of 62%, and a negative predictive value of 38%. When the three diagnostic modalities were analyzed together, the sensitivity reached 75%, and the specificity reached 23%. Conclusions: the combination of PTB and inflammatory biomarkers demonstrated moderate effectiveness and diagnostic performance comparable to PTB combined with radiography. These findings suggest that biomarkers may serve as a practical and accessible diagnostic adjunct in settings where imaging availability is limited or radiographic interpretation is challenging. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Therapies for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1035 KB  
Article
Quantitative Bone SPECT/CT in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Diagnostic Performance Within-Patient Lesion–Contralateral Separation and Associations with Inflammatory Burden
by Hulya Peker Yalcin, Pınar Akkus Gunduz, Mehmet Samsum, Emel Colak Samsum, Aysenur Erol, Umut Mert Turan, Gulsah Gedikli Turgut, Aysun Yalci, Nihal Yesildag, Musa Fatih Yalcin and Nesibe Zeynep Eryavuz
Diagnostics 2025, 15(22), 2907; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15222907 - 17 Nov 2025
Viewed by 758
Abstract
Objective: We sought to assess the diagnostic performance of quantitative bone SPECT/CT standardized uptake values (SUVs) in diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) and their associations with inflammatory biomarkers. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 150 consecutive patients who underwent three-phase bone scintigraphy and foot [...] Read more.
Objective: We sought to assess the diagnostic performance of quantitative bone SPECT/CT standardized uptake values (SUVs) in diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) and their associations with inflammatory biomarkers. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 150 consecutive patients who underwent three-phase bone scintigraphy and foot SPECT/CT (November 2016–December 2024) for DFO before antibiotic treatment; 117 with complete imaging and laboratory data were analyzed. Lesion and contralateral SUVs (SUVmax, SUVmean) were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine discrimination and optimal cut-offs (Youden index). Associations with biomarkers (C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), CRP/albumin (ESR × CRP) and hematologic/coagulation indices including mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were evaluated using Spearman correlations. Results: Lesion uptake and contralateral uptake were SUVmax 10.94 ± 7.36 vs. 3.62 ± 1.70; SUVmean 4.38 ± 3.63 vs. 0.93 ± 0.50. Discrimination was excellent; SUVmax was AUC 0.921 (cut-off 4.47; sensitivity 0.93; specificity 0.75) and SUVmean was AUC 0.961 (cut-off 1.49; sensitivity 0.91; specificity 0.89). CRP and ESR showed weak but consistent positive correlations with SUVs (ρ ≈ 0.25–0.30). The ESR × CRP value correlated most strongly (e.g., with SUVmean ρ = 0.35), and CRP/albumin showed a modest positive association. MCH (ρ ≈ −0.20) and aPTT (ρ ≈ −0.37) were inversely related. Conclusions: Quantitative SPECT/CT provides excellent lesion–contralateral discrimination in DFO. SUVs—particularly SUVmean—track inflammatory burden, supporting their use as practical quantitative adjuncts to clinical and laboratory assessment. Study-specific cut-offs are promising but require local validation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 678 KB  
Systematic Review
Factors Influencing Major Amputation and Death Following Limb Salvage Surgery in a Diabetic Population: Systematic Review and Real-World Comparison
by Kit Ferguson, Sifat M. Alam, Connor Phillips, Lia Spencer, Michelle Goodeve, Selina Begum, Harrison Travis, Jade Tang, Richard Feinn, Douglas McHugh and Ewan Kannegieter
Complications 2025, 2(4), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/complications2040026 - 22 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3262
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers drive non-traumatic lower-limb amputation; limb salvage surgery is often pursued to preserve function and survival. Predictors of adverse outcomes remain incompletely defined, and evidence for multidisciplinary team (MDT) care is heterogeneous. We aimed to clarify risk factors for major amputation [...] Read more.
Diabetic foot ulcers drive non-traumatic lower-limb amputation; limb salvage surgery is often pursued to preserve function and survival. Predictors of adverse outcomes remain incompletely defined, and evidence for multidisciplinary team (MDT) care is heterogeneous. We aimed to clarify risk factors for major amputation and death after diabetic limb salvage and evaluate MDT impact. We systematically reviewed 49 studies (2020–2025) reporting major amputation or mortality after limb salvage in diabetes (PROSPERO CRD420251044859). Risk factors spanned demographic, clinical, and surgical domains (e.g., older age, male sex, renal/cardiovascular disease, ischemia, osteomyelitis, advanced ulcer classification). MDT models generally showed lower amputation rates and improved wound healing, with occasional survival benefits; heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. As a real-world comparator, the Mid Essex Diabetes Amputation Reduction Plan (MEDARP) treated 72 high-risk patients using a “toe and flow” MDT. Major amputation occurred in 6.9% and mortality in 12.5%, both at or below published ranges, with gains in patient-reported outcomes. Findings support MDT-based strategies, but conclusions should be interpreted cautiously given the predominantly observational evidence, and highlight the need for standardized outcome definitions and reporting. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2265 KB  
Systematic Review
Multifaceted Antibiotic Resistance in Diabetic Foot Infections: A Systematic Review
by Weiqi Li, Oren Sadeh, Jina Chakraborty, Emily Yang, Paramita Basu and Priyank Kumar
Microorganisms 2025, 13(10), 2311; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13102311 - 6 Oct 2025
Viewed by 2462
Abstract
Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are a significant complication in patients with diabetes, often leading to severe clinical complications including amputation and increased mortality rates. The effective management of these infections is complicated by the rise in antibiotic resistance among the microbial populations involved. [...] Read more.
Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are a significant complication in patients with diabetes, often leading to severe clinical complications including amputation and increased mortality rates. The effective management of these infections is complicated by the rise in antibiotic resistance among the microbial populations involved. In this paper, we undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the bacterial profiles, as well as their antibiotic resistance patterns in DFIs, encompassing studies published between 2014 and 2024. A total of 28 studies were selected from several databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, EBSCOhost, and ScienceDirect, published from 2014 to 2024, specifically focusing on diabetic foot infections and antibiotic resistance. Diabetic foot infections arise from a combination of factors, including peripheral neuropathy, poor circulation, and immune system impairment, making diabetic patients prone to unnoticed injuries, impaired wound healing, and a higher risk of infections. The severity of DFIs often depends on the size and depth of the ulcers, with larger, deeper ulcers posing additional risks of infection and complications, such as osteomyelitis and sepsis. Our study synthesizes information on the total isolates of microbes, their resistance to one or more groups of antibiotics, and resistance panel results across multiple antibiotics, including amoxicillin/clavulanate, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, and others. We meticulously catalog the resistance of key bacterial strains—Escherichia coli, Enterobacter spp., Proteus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Staphylococcus aureus, and others—highlighting patterns of resistance to single and multiple antibiotic groups. This systematic review also analyzes the correlations of various comorbidities reported by the diabetic foot infection patient populations in the included studies with multiple antibiotic resistance patterns. Subsequently, this analytical review study addresses the rising prevalence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens and underscores the need for antibiotic stewardship programs to promote judicious use of antibiotics, reduce the spread of resistant strains, and enhance therapeutic outcomes. In addition, the review discusses the implications of resistance to empirical antibiotic treatments, underscoring the necessity for tailored antibiotic therapy based on culture and sensitivity results to optimize treatment outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Antimicrobial Agents and Resistance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 243 KB  
Article
Real-World Use of Dalbavancin in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: PEDDAL Study
by Leonor Moreno Núñez, Ana Rueda Benito, Elena Bereciartua, Laura Morata, Rosa Escudero-Sánchez, Julia Sellares Nadal, Joan Gómez-Junyent, Alejandro Salinas Botrán, Ana María Arnáiz García, María Dolores del Toro López, Diana Ruiz-Cabrera, José Miguel Ramos Andrino, Fatma Alidrous, Marina Torío-Salvador, Miguel Ángel Verdejo and María Velasco Arribas
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(19), 6705; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196705 - 23 Sep 2025
Viewed by 933
Abstract
Background: Data on antibiotic treatment for diabetic foot osteomyelitis are limited. This study aims to describe the real-world effectiveness and safety of dalbavancin in treating deep diabetic foot infections. Methods: A retrospective, observational, multicenter study was conducted in nine Spanish hospitals and one [...] Read more.
Background: Data on antibiotic treatment for diabetic foot osteomyelitis are limited. This study aims to describe the real-world effectiveness and safety of dalbavancin in treating deep diabetic foot infections. Methods: A retrospective, observational, multicenter study was conducted in nine Spanish hospitals and one Irish hospital. Patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis treated with dalbavancin were included. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, microbiology, antibiotic regimens, adverse events, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Among 136 patients, 76% were male, with a mean age of 69 ± 12 years. Renal insufficiency was observed in 32%, and 6% required renal replacement therapy. Based on the McCabe scale, 70% of patients had a rapidly or ultimately fatal disease. Polypharmacy was noted in 83%, and 60% of infections were moderate. Dalbavancin was primarily used as second-line therapy (92%). The cure rate was 80.9% (95% CI: 73.5–86.6%), achieved after a median of two doses. Patients receiving dalbavancin as first-line therapy had a cure rate of 86%, comparable to 80% in second-line therapy, with no significant differences. Surgical interventions were required in 72% of cases, with minor amputations performed in 40% of patients. Polymicrobial infections were common (55%), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was identified in 26% of cases. Adverse events occurred in 5% of patients. Chronic kidney disease was the sole independent risk factor for therapeutic failure (IRR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.64–1.00, p = 0.045). Conclusions: Dalbavancin is effective and safe for treating diabetic foot osteomyelitis, including in complex patients with resistant microorganisms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)
29 pages, 4778 KB  
Article
In Silico Development of a Chimeric Multi-Epitope Vaccine Targeting Helcococcus kunzii: Coupling Subtractive Proteomics and Reverse Vaccinology for Vaccine Target Discovery
by Khaled S. Allemailem
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(9), 1258; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18091258 - 25 Aug 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2224
Abstract
Background: Helcococcus kunzii, a facultative anaerobe and Gram-positive coccus, has been documented as a cunning pathogen, mainly in immunocompromised individuals, as evidenced by recent clinical and microbiological reports. It has been associated with a variety of polymicrobial infections, comprising diabetic foot [...] Read more.
Background: Helcococcus kunzii, a facultative anaerobe and Gram-positive coccus, has been documented as a cunning pathogen, mainly in immunocompromised individuals, as evidenced by recent clinical and microbiological reports. It has been associated with a variety of polymicrobial infections, comprising diabetic foot ulcers, prosthetic joint infections, osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and bloodstream infections. Despite its emerging clinical relevance, no licensed vaccine or targeted immunotherapy currently exists for H. kunzii, and its rising resistance to conventional antibiotics presents a growing public health concern. Objectives: In this study, we employed an integrated subtractive proteomics and immunoinformatics pipeline to design a multi-epitope subunit vaccine (MEV) candidate against H. kunzii. Initially, pan-proteome analysis identified non-redundant, essential, non-homologous, and virulent proteins suitable for therapeutic targeting. Methods/Results: From these, two highly conserved and surface-accessible proteins, cell division protein FtsZ and peptidoglycan glycosyltransferase FtsW, were selected as promising vaccine targets. Comprehensive epitope prediction identified nine cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL), five helper T-lymphocyte (HTL), and two linear B-cell (LBL) epitopes, which were rationally assembled into a 397-amino-acid-long chimeric construct. The construct was designed using appropriate linkers and adjuvanted with the cholera toxin B (CTB) subunit (NCBI accession: AND74811.1) to enhance immunogenicity. Molecular docking and dynamics simulations revealed persistent and high-affinity ties amongst the MEV and essential immune receptors, indicating a durable ability to elicit an immune reaction. In silico immune dynamic simulations predicted vigorous B- and T-cell-mediated immune responses. Codon optimization and computer-aided cloning into the E. coli K12 host employing the pET-28a(+) vector suggested high translational efficiency and suitability for bacterial expression. Conclusions: Overall, this computationally designed MEV demonstrates favorable immunological and physicochemical properties, and presents a durable candidate for subsequent in vitro and in vivo validation against H. kunzii-associated infections. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1099 KB  
Article
Using Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Validation of Deep Learning Model for Plain Radiograph Interpretation
by Francisco Javier Álvaro-Afonso, Aroa Tardáguila-García, Mateo López-Moral, Irene Sanz-Corbalán, Esther García-Morales and José Luis Lázaro-Martínez
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(15), 8583; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158583 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1945
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a ResNet-50-based deep learning model for automatic detection of osteomyelitis (DFO) in plain radiographs of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Research Design and Methods: This retrospective study included 168 patients with type one or type two diabetes [...] Read more.
Objective: To develop and validate a ResNet-50-based deep learning model for automatic detection of osteomyelitis (DFO) in plain radiographs of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Research Design and Methods: This retrospective study included 168 patients with type one or type two diabetes and clinical suspicion of DFO confirmed via a surgical bone biopsy. An experienced clinician and a pretrained ResNet-50 model independently interpreted the radiographs. The model was developed using Python-based frameworks with ChatGPT assistance for coding. The diagnostic performance was assessed against the histopathological findings, calculating sensitivity, specificity, the positive predictive value (PPV), the negative predictive value (NPV), and the likelihood ratios. Agreement between the AI model and the clinician was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa coefficient. Results: The AI model demonstrated high sensitivity (92.8%) and PPV (0.97), but low-level specificity (4.4%). The clinician showed 90.2% sensitivity and 37.8% specificity. The Cohen’s kappa coefficient between the AI model and the clinician was −0.105 (p = 0.117), indicating weak agreement. Both the methods tended to classify many cases as DFO-positive, with 81.5% agreement in the positive cases. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of IA to support the radiographic diagnosis of DFO using a ResNet-50-based deep learning model. AI-assisted radiographic interpretation could enhance early DFO detection, particularly in high-prevalence settings. However, further validation is necessary to improve its specificity and assess its utility in primary care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Sensors in Biomechanics and Biomedicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1265 KB  
Review
Novel Treatments for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Narrative Review
by Crystal Jing, Julia E. Ralph, Jamie Lim, Jackson M. Cathey, Conor N. O'Neill and Albert T. Anastasio
Microorganisms 2025, 13(7), 1639; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13071639 - 11 Jul 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4516
Abstract
Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a severe complication of diabetes mellitus and a leading cause of non-traumatic lower extremity amputation. Treatment remains clinically challenging with high recurrence rates despite standard antibiotic therapy and surgical debridement. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on novel [...] Read more.
Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a severe complication of diabetes mellitus and a leading cause of non-traumatic lower extremity amputation. Treatment remains clinically challenging with high recurrence rates despite standard antibiotic therapy and surgical debridement. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on novel operative and nonoperative therapies for DFO, focusing on emerging biomaterials, local antibiotic delivery systems, innovative surgical techniques, and adjunctive topical agents. Studies examining bioabsorbable and nonabsorbable antibiotic carriers, such as calcium sulfate beads, collagen sponges, and bioactive glass, demonstrate promising infection resolution rates and a potential to reduce the surgical burden, though most are limited by small cohorts and observational designs. Similarly, alternative surgical approaches (i.e., cancelloplasty, conservative bone excision, and tibial cortex distraction) have shown early success in limb preservation. Nonoperative strategies, including adjunct antimicrobials, antimicrobial peptides, and topical oxygen, offer additional options, particularly for patients unfit for surgery. While initial outcomes are encouraging, the supporting evidence is heterogeneous and primarily limited to case series and small, noncomparative trials. Overall, these novel therapies show potential as adjuncts to established DFO management, but further prospective research is indicated to define their long-term efficacy, safety, and role in clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Microbiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 910 KB  
Article
5-Year Follow-Up of Advanced Therapy Use in High-Risk Diabetic Foot Ulcers
by Margaret Doucette, Stephanie Seabolt, Kattie Payne and Jeremy Boyd
Diabetology 2025, 6(7), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology6070061 - 1 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1734
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Advanced wound healing biologics for diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) are typically withheld from persons who are at high risk for amputation. However, a prospective, single-center cohort study evaluated the use of an advanced biologic, dehydrated amniotic (DAMA) tissue as early treatment for [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Advanced wound healing biologics for diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) are typically withheld from persons who are at high risk for amputation. However, a prospective, single-center cohort study evaluated the use of an advanced biologic, dehydrated amniotic (DAMA) tissue as early treatment for DFUs in patients with a high risk for amputation, demonstrating benefit for a small sample. This is the report of the five-year follow-up of those high-risk participants. Methods: This chart review provides a 5-year follow-up of 18 of 20 participants in the original study. The data were collected by medical record review. Specific data points included mortality, re-ulceration and additional ulceration, amputation (minor and major), end-stage renal disease with dialysis dependence, hospitalization, and limb-threatening ischemia. Results: The 5-year mortality rate from the time of wound healing was 50% (9/18 deceased). Four of the eighteen participants (22.2%) underwent major amputation within 5 years of study completion. Two had amputations of the study limb and two had amputations of the contralateral limb. Fifty percent (2/4) of those who had amputations died within 5 years after the major amputation. Over fifty percent (55.5% or 10 out of 18) of the participants experienced the re-ulceration of the original study ulcer and 94% (17 out of 18) developed a new site ulceration. A total of 25% of the hospitalizations over the 5 years were related to DFU (infection, osteomyelitis, and sepsis). Conclusions: This small-sample 5-year follow-up shows that early treatment with dehydrated amniotic (DAMA) tissue in patients with diabetic foot ulcers of moderate-to-high amputation risk results in similar outcomes as noted in the current research on patients with low risk for amputation. In fact, this paper may suggest that advanced biologics can safely be used for early treatment in moderate-to-high amputation risk without increasing mortality and amputation over 5 years. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1478 KB  
Article
Reconstructive Arthrodesis for Advanced Ankle and Subtalar Joint Destruction in Neuropathic and Infected Feet
by Martin Korbel, Jaromír Šrot and Pavel Šponer
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4516; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134516 - 25 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1062
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Advanced destruction of the ankle and subtalar joints due to neuropathy, chronic infection, or inflammatory conditions presents a major surgical challenge, often resulting in limb amputation. This descriptive retrospective study aims to evaluate outcomes of reconstructive surgery in patients, in whom [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Advanced destruction of the ankle and subtalar joints due to neuropathy, chronic infection, or inflammatory conditions presents a major surgical challenge, often resulting in limb amputation. This descriptive retrospective study aims to evaluate outcomes of reconstructive surgery in patients, in whom limb preservation was prioritized over amputation despite significant soft tissue and osseous involvement. Methods: Between January 2013 and December 2022, 31 reconstructive procedures were performed on 29 patients (16 women and 13 men) with severe hindfoot deformities. Etiologies included Charcot arthropathy (55%), osteomyelitis (25%), combined pathology (10%), and rheumatoid deformity with skin defect (10%). Surgical procedures included tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (39%), astragalectomy with tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis (32%), tibiotalar arthrodesis (23%), and multistage procedures (6%). Fixation methods varied based on the extent of deformity and infection. The union was assessed via radiographs and CT imaging, and outcomes were statistically analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Successful arthrodesis was achieved in 74% of cases (23/31). The union rate was significantly influenced by the type and level of fixation (p = 0.0199), with the lowest rate observed in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using external fixation (17%). Complications included surgical site infection or abscess in 42% of cases, requiring reoperation in 35%. Limb amputation was ultimately necessary in five patients (16%). Conclusions: Despite high complication rates, limb-preserving reconstructive surgery remains a viable alternative to amputation in selected high-risk patients with severe hindfoot pathology. Appropriate preoperative planning, tailored surgical strategy, and patient compliance are essential to achieving functional limb salvage and restoring weight-bearing capacity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Foot and Ankle Surgery: State of the Art and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2017 KB  
Article
Antibiotic-Loaded Hydroxyapatite Ceramic in the Management of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: An Investigation of Factors That Determine Patient Outcomes
by Ken Meng Tai, Justin Mooteeram, Sara Metaoy and Anand Pillai
BioMed 2025, 5(2), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomed5020011 - 29 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2223
Abstract
Background: Diabetic foot osteomyelitis is a complex condition to manage, with substantial risk of treatment failure, which could necessitate major amputations. Surgical debridement and prolonged systemic antibiotic therapy have been the mainstay of treatment, but recurrence rates remain high. The use of [...] Read more.
Background: Diabetic foot osteomyelitis is a complex condition to manage, with substantial risk of treatment failure, which could necessitate major amputations. Surgical debridement and prolonged systemic antibiotic therapy have been the mainstay of treatment, but recurrence rates remain high. The use of adjuvant local antibiotic therapy has been proposed as a potential adjunct to improve outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study involved 113 patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis, who underwent debridement and application of antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite ceramic from the year 2018 to 2023. Clinical outcomes of interest were eradication of infection, ulcer healing, recurrence of infection, prevention of major amputation and mortality rate. Patient-associated factors were identified and analysed. Results: Eradication of infection was achieved in 96%, healing of ulcer in 93% and limb salvage in 95% of patients. The mortality rate at 1 year was 5.4%. Peripheral arterial disease, HbA1c and CRP levels were statistically significant in affecting treatment outcomes. Other factors had no impact on the treatment success. Conclusions: This is the largest single-centre study involving Cerament G and V in the management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis and the first investigating the specific factors associated with outcome goals. The use of these antibiotic-loaded carriers demonstrated excellent eradication of infection, healing of ulcer and limb salvage and prevention of recurrence of infection. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 798 KB  
Article
Bone Substitute in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis Treatment
by Roberto Da Ros, Roberta Assaloni, Andrea Michelli, Barbara Brunato, Enrica Barro and Cesare Miranda
Diabetology 2025, 6(4), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology6040030 - 14 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1520
Abstract
Background: Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) constitutes a severe and prevalent complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). Individuals afflicted with DM exhibit an elevated risk for DFO development, attributable to a confluence of factors, including peripheral neuropathy, compromised circulation, and impaired immune function. Timely [...] Read more.
Background: Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) constitutes a severe and prevalent complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). Individuals afflicted with DM exhibit an elevated risk for DFO development, attributable to a confluence of factors, including peripheral neuropathy, compromised circulation, and impaired immune function. Timely diagnosis and appropriate therapeutic intervention are paramount. In recent years, alongside the ablative approach, the feasibility of substituting compromised bone with a bone substitute has emerged. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed resorbable bone grafting procedures performed at our third-level center for the care of people with diabetes between 2019 and 2024. Forty-nine patients were included in this. The median follow-up period was 13 months (Q1 7, Q3 20). Results: At follow-up, 34 patients (69%) had achieved healing, with a median healing time of 2.3 months (Q1 1.5, Q3 5). Lesion location significantly influenced healing outcomes, with forefoot and midfoot lesions demonstrating an 86% healing rate compared to 50% for hindfoot lesions. Eleven patients (22%) experienced infectious relapse after a median of 1 month (Q1 0.7, Q3 2.9). An analysis of different bone substitutes did not reveal significant differences in terms of healing among the various products and between the presence or absence of a local antibiotic. Conclusions: Bone substitute implantation offers an additional conservative strategy for managing DFO. Healing rates are significantly higher for forefoot and midfoot lesions, suggesting that further research is needed to improve outcomes in hindfoot osteomyelitis. Selection of the most effective bone substitute requires further studies. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 1208 KB  
Article
Are Deep Tissue Cultures a Reliable Alternative to Bone Biopsy for Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis? A Comparative Diagnostic Study
by Serap Ulusoy, İbrahim Kılınç, Belgin Coşkun and Müge Ayhan
Diagnostics 2025, 15(7), 880; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15070880 - 1 Apr 2025
Viewed by 2319
Abstract
Background: Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a serious complication of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) that contributes to high morbidity and an increased risk of lower extremity amputation. While bone biopsy cultures are considered the gold standard for identifying causative pathogens, their invasive nature [...] Read more.
Background: Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a serious complication of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) that contributes to high morbidity and an increased risk of lower extremity amputation. While bone biopsy cultures are considered the gold standard for identifying causative pathogens, their invasive nature limits widespread clinical use. This study evaluates the microbiological concordance between deep tissue and bone cultures in diagnosing DFO. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 107 patients with DFO who underwent simultaneous deep tissue and bone biopsy cultures. Patient demographics, ulcer classification, and microbiological culture results were recorded. The agreement between deep tissue and bone cultures was assessed to determine the diagnostic utility of deep tissue sampling. Results: The overall concordance between deep tissue and bone cultures was 51.8%. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated pathogen in both culture types and had the highest agreement rate (44.4%). Concordance rates were lower for Gram-negative bacteria (31.9%) and other Gram-positive microorganisms (24.2%). In 21.2% of the cases, pathogens were isolated only from deep tissue cultures, while 16.5% had positive bone cultures but negative deep tissue cultures. Conclusions: Deep tissue cultures demonstrate moderate microbiological concordance with bone biopsy in the diagnosis of DFO, particularly in cases with monomicrobial Staphylococcus aureus infection. While bone biopsy remains the gold standard, deep tissue cultures may be a practical alternative when bone sampling is not feasible or for patients unsuitable for surgery. However, their limited reliability in detecting Gram-negative and polymicrobial infections underscores the need for more accurate, less invasive diagnostic tools. Future research should focus on validating molecular and advanced diagnostic methods to improve clinical decision-making and patient outcomes in DFO. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 258 KB  
Review
Not All in Vein: Oral Antibiotics for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Narrative Review
by Benoit Gachet, Marcos C. Schechter, David G. Armstrong, Olivier Robineau and Eric Senneville
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(5), 1405; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051405 - 20 Feb 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 5665
Abstract
Introduction: Osteomyelitis is a severe complication of diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFUs) often managed with antibiotic therapy and surgical resection of the infected bone. Areas of research: While intravenous (IV) antibiotics have been the traditional approach for bone and joint infections in general, randomized [...] Read more.
Introduction: Osteomyelitis is a severe complication of diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFUs) often managed with antibiotic therapy and surgical resection of the infected bone. Areas of research: While intravenous (IV) antibiotics have been the traditional approach for bone and joint infections in general, randomized clinical trials have shown that, overall, oral antibiotics are non-inferior to IV antibiotics. While comparisons between oral antibiotics are generally lacking, the data suggest that oral antibiotics with high bioavailability and bone penetration ratios should be prioritized for osteomyelitis treatment, including diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). Oral regimens reduce hospital stays, avert catheter-related complications, and decrease treatment costs while improving patient satisfaction and quality of life. Despite these advantages, IV antibiotics remain widely used, partly due to clinical tradition and concerns about oral absorption in individuals with diabetes. Current guidelines recommend transitioning to oral therapy once systemic signs improve, but robust data supporting oral-only regimens for DFO treated non-surgically remain limited. Conclusions: Oral antibiotics represent a safe and effective alternative to IV therapy for many patients with DFO, particularly when high-bioavailability agents are used. Further well-designed studies are needed to validate their efficacy in non-surgical DFO management and inform clinical guidelines. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)
Back to TopTop