Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (23)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = coronary endarterectomy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 1105 KiB  
Article
Comorbidity Burden in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Implications and Outcome
by Burcak Kilickiran Avci, Ibrahim Basarici, Mehmet Akbulut, Halil Atas, Yalin Tolga Yaylali, Umit Yasar Sinan, Ersan Atahan, Murat Meric, Baris Kaya, Kardelen Ohtaroglu Tokdil, Ozden Calay, Hasan Tokdil, Bulent Mutlu, Mehmet Serdar Kucukoglu and Zeki Ongen
Medicina 2025, 61(5), 827; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61050827 - 30 Apr 2025
Viewed by 558
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Comorbidities, the coexistence of additional conditions with a primary disease, are increasingly prevalent, complicating disease management and clinical outcomes. While CTEPH is a well-studied condition in terms of risk factors and outcomes, the specific impact of comorbidity burden on [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Comorbidities, the coexistence of additional conditions with a primary disease, are increasingly prevalent, complicating disease management and clinical outcomes. While CTEPH is a well-studied condition in terms of risk factors and outcomes, the specific impact of comorbidity burden on clinical presentation, treatment decisions, and survival remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to assess the prevalence and burden of comorbidities in CTEPH and to examine their associations with initial clinical characteristics, treatment allocation, and survival, stratified by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) status. Materials and Methods: We included 187 CTEPH patients from eight tertiary PH centers (2009–2020). Cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities were identified and categorized as 0, 1–2, or ≥3. Their impact on baseline six-minute walk distance (6MWD), hemodynamic parameters, operability decision, and survival was assessed. Results: Comorbidities were prevalent (90%), with 49% of patients having three or more. Hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) were associated with lower 6MWD. Hypertension, atrial fibrillation, left heart failure, and CKD were linked to elevated right atrial and pulmonary arterial wedge pressures. Comorbidities rendered 39% of anatomically operable patients ineligible for surgery. No single comorbidity predicted survival. Among PEA patients, those with ≥3 cardiovascular comorbidities had worse survival (p = 0.010). In contrast, the comorbidity burden did not impact survival in non-PEA patients. PEA surgery (HR 0.342, 95% CI 0.130–0.899, p = 0.030) and baseline 6MWD (HR 0.997, 95% CI 0.994–1.000, p = 0.036) were identified as independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions: A high comorbidity burden is common in CTEPH and influences functional status, hemodynamics, and operability decisions. It may worsen long-term outcomes after PEA but appears to be less prognostic in non-operated patients, where disease severity seems to be the primary determinant of outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of careful operability assessment and proactive comorbidity management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 2812 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Impact of Elevated Lipoprotein (a) Levels on Postoperative Outcomes in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review
by João Carvalheiras Marques, Mariana Fragão Marques, Hugo Ribeiro, António Pereira Neves, Peter Zlatanovic and João Rocha Neves
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(7), 2253; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072253 - 26 Mar 2025
Viewed by 670
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Numerous studies have highlighted lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) as a significant, independent risk factor for the development and progression of cardiovascular diseases, including carotid artery disease, which is strongly correlated with an elevated risk of ischemic events and stroke. This systematic review aims [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Numerous studies have highlighted lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) as a significant, independent risk factor for the development and progression of cardiovascular diseases, including carotid artery disease, which is strongly correlated with an elevated risk of ischemic events and stroke. This systematic review aims to determine the impact of elevated Lp(a) levels on the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods: Four electronic databases—PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library—were employed to search for studies assessing the association between elevated Lp(a) levels and the postoperative outcomes following CEA. The effect of elevated Lp(a) levels was systematically reviewed, and the outcomes reported in each study were evaluated. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tool for observational cohorts and cross-sectional studies. Results: A total of five observational studies were included, with 1450 patients. The mean age of the participants in the studies ranged from 57 to 74 years, and the percentage of males ranged from 37.22% to 68.96%. One study showed that elevated Lp(a) levels were significantly associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) after CEA, particularly periprocedural stroke, with another manuscript suggesting a long-term predictive value for acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) within 24 months following surgery. There was no association in the included studies with carotid plaque instability, inflammation biomarkers, or restenosis. Conclusions: This systematic review suggests an association of Lp(a) levels with MACEs and ACSs after CEA although no association with restenosis and carotid plaque inflammation and/or instability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1006 KiB  
Article
The VEGFA rs2010963 Gene Polymorphism Is a Potential Genetic Risk Factor for Myocardial Infarction in Slovenian Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
by Emin Grbić, Jernej Letonja and Danijel Petrovič
Biomolecules 2024, 14(12), 1584; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14121584 - 11 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1094
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a life-threatening condition caused by the chronic gradual narrowing of the lumen of the blood vessels of the heart by atherosclerotic plaque with a strong genetic component. The aim of our study was to investigate the association between [...] Read more.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a life-threatening condition caused by the chronic gradual narrowing of the lumen of the blood vessels of the heart by atherosclerotic plaque with a strong genetic component. The aim of our study was to investigate the association between the VEGFA polymorphism rs2010963 and myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes, as well as the expression of VEGFA. A total of 1589 unrelated Caucasians with T2DM lasting longer than 10 years were divided into two groups: case group subjects with MI (484) and a control group without a history of CAD (1105). A total of 25 endarterectomy sequesters were immunohistochemically stained to assess VEGFA expression. The rs2010963 polymorphism of the VEGFA gene was genotyped using a KBioscience Ltd. competitive allele-specific fluorescence-based PCR (KASPar) assay. The C allele was significantly more common in the case group according to the dominant model of inheritance (CC + CG vs. GG) (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.05–1.66; p = 0.0197). A statistically significantly higher numerical areal density of VEGFA-positive cells was found in subjects with the C allele (CC + CG genotypes) in comparison to the GG genotype (117 ± 35/mm2 vs. 58 ± 21/mm2; p < 0.001). To conclude, the rs2010963 polymorphism is a potential genetic risk factor for myocardial infarction in Slovenian patients with T2DM. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 249 KiB  
Article
Operative Factors Associated with Severe Hypotension in the Postoperative Setting in Patients with Carotid Artery Endarterectomy
by Mircea Robu, Irina-Maria Margarint, Ovidiu Stiru, Andreea Raluca Hanganu, Bogdan Radulescu, Vlad Ichim, Gabriel-Petre Gorecki, Miruna Guzu, Claudia Mazilu, Vlad Anton Iliescu and Horatiu Moldovan
Life 2024, 14(11), 1435; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14111435 - 6 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1193
Abstract
Background: Carotid endarterectomy is a recognized method for preventing stroke for both symptomatic and asymptomatic hemodynamically carotid artery stenosis. Hemodynamic depression is more frequently associated with carotid artery stenting, while postoperative hypertension and cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome are known frequent complications after carotid endarterectomy. [...] Read more.
Background: Carotid endarterectomy is a recognized method for preventing stroke for both symptomatic and asymptomatic hemodynamically carotid artery stenosis. Hemodynamic depression is more frequently associated with carotid artery stenting, while postoperative hypertension and cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome are known frequent complications after carotid endarterectomy. Severe hypotension after carotid revascularization is associated with a higher risk of perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction, and death, with limited data existing regarding risk factors. This study aims to investigate intraoperative risk factors for severe hypotension after carotid endarterectomy. Methods: A total of 160 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy were included in this study. Patients with other cardiac conditions that required concomitant cardiac surgery, patients with incomplete medical records, and patients considered high risk for surgery were excluded. Results: The incidence of severe hypotension was 30.6%. Patients with severe hypotension after carotid endarterectomy had a higher incidence of diabetes, moderate mitral valve regurgitation, a history of percutaneous coronary intervention, and higher operative times. Using logistic regression, temporary shunt insertion was independently associated with severe postoperative hypotension (OR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.09–4.71, p = 0.029). Conclusions: This result favors the selective shunting strategy when performing carotid endarterectomies, especially for those patients with comorbidities predisposing to postoperative complications. Full article
15 pages, 602 KiB  
Article
A Routine Coronary Angiography before Carotid Endarterectomy as an Example of Interdisciplinary Work: The Immediate Results of the Surgery
by Alexey N. Sumin, Anna V. Shcheglova, Olesya V. Adyakova, Darina N. Fedorova, Denis D. Yakovlev, Natalia A. Svinolupova, Svetlana V. Kabanova, Anastasia V. Malysheva, Marina Yu Karachenko, Vasily V. Kashtalap and Olga L. Barbarash
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(18), 5495; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185495 - 17 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1220
Abstract
The aim: to evaluate the incidence of obstructive lesions of the coronary arteries during routine coronary angiography (CAG) before carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and the incidence of perioperative complications. Materials and Methods: We examined a continuous sample of 498 patients before CEA [...] Read more.
The aim: to evaluate the incidence of obstructive lesions of the coronary arteries during routine coronary angiography (CAG) before carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and the incidence of perioperative complications. Materials and Methods: We examined a continuous sample of 498 patients before CEA who underwent an invasive evaluation of the coronary bed during CAG. Depending on the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery lesions, the patients were divided into three groups: group I—obstructive coronary artery disease (≥70%) (n = 309, 62.0%); group II—non-obstructive lesions of the coronary arteries (<70%) (n = 118, 23.7%); group III—intact coronary arteries (n = 71, 14.3%). The groups were compared with each other according to the data of the preoperative examination (clinical and anamnestic parameters, laboratory data and results of echocardiography), as well as according to the immediate results of the operation. In the hospital period, adverse cardiovascular events were assessed: death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF/AFL) and combined endpoint. Results: The groups differed significantly in the presence of symptoms of angina pectoris, myocardial infarction and myocardial revascularization procedures in their medical history and in the presence of chronic ischemia of the lower extremities. However, in the group of intact coronary arteries, the symptoms of angina were in 14.1% of patients, and a history of myocardial infarction was in 12.7%. Myocardial revascularization before CEA or simultaneously with it was performed in 43.0% of patients. As a result, it was possible to reduce the number of perioperative cardiac complications (mortality 0.7%, perioperative myocardial infarction 1.96%). Conclusions: The high incidence of obstructive lesions in the coronary arteries in our patients and the minimum number of perioperative complications favor routine CAG before CEA. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2403 KiB  
Review
Management of Severe Bilateral Symptomatic Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis: Case Report and Literature Review
by Mircea Robu, Bogdan Radulescu, Irina-Maria Margarint, Anca Dragan, Ovidiu Stiru, Gabriel-Petre Gorecki, Cristian Voica, Vlad Anton Iliescu and Horatiu Moldovan
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(9), 893; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14090893 - 23 Aug 2024
Viewed by 2137
Abstract
Multiple strategies for tandem severe carotid artery stenosis are reported: bilateral carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA), bilateral carotid artery stenting (CAS), and hybrid procedures (CEA and CAS). The management is controversial, considering the reported high risk of periprocedural stroke, hemodynamic distress, and cerebral hyperperfusion [...] Read more.
Multiple strategies for tandem severe carotid artery stenosis are reported: bilateral carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA), bilateral carotid artery stenting (CAS), and hybrid procedures (CEA and CAS). The management is controversial, considering the reported high risk of periprocedural stroke, hemodynamic distress, and cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. We present the case of a 64-year-old patient with severe symptomatic bilateral internal carotid artery stenosis (95% stenosis on the left internal carotid artery with recent ipsilateral watershed anterior cerebral artery–medial cerebral artery (ACA-MCA) and medial cerebral artery–posterior cerebral artery (MCA-PCA) ischemic strokes and 90% stenosis on the right internal carotid artery with chronic ipsilateral frontal ischemic stroke) managed successfully with staged CEA within a 3-day interval. The patient had a history of coronary angioplasty and stenting. Strategies for brain protection included shunt placement after the evaluation of carotid stump pressure, internal carotid backflow, and near-infrared spectroscopy. A collagen and silver-coated polyester patch was used to complete the endarterectomy using a 6.0 polypropylene continuous suture in both instances. Management also included neurological consults after extubation, dual antiplatelet therapy, head CT between the two surgeries, myocardial ischemia monitoring, and general anesthesia. Staged CEA with a small time interval between surgeries can be an option to treat tandem symptomatic carotid artery stenosis in highly selected patients. The decision should be tailored according to the patient’s characteristics and should also be made by a cardiology specialist, a neurology specialist, and an anesthesia and intensive care physician. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Review Special Issue: Recent Advances in Personalized Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1872 KiB  
Review
Carotid Interventions in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Narrative Review
by Andrea Xodo, Alessandro Gregio, Fabio Pilon, Domenico Milite, Tommaso Hinna Danesi, Giovanni Badalamenti, Sandro Lepidi and Mario D’Oria
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(11), 3019; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113019 - 21 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2005
Abstract
Simultaneous carotid artery stenosis (CS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common condition among patients with several cardiovascular risk factors; however, its optimal management still remains under investigation, such as the assumption that carotid disease is causally related to perioperative stroke and [...] Read more.
Simultaneous carotid artery stenosis (CS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common condition among patients with several cardiovascular risk factors; however, its optimal management still remains under investigation, such as the assumption that carotid disease is causally related to perioperative stroke and that preventive carotid revascularization decrease the risk of this complication. Synchronous surgical approach to both conditions, performing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) before coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) during the same procedure, should still be considered in selective patients, in order to reduce the risk of perioperative stroke during coronary cardiac surgery. For the same purpose, staged approaches, such as CEA followed by CABG or CABG followed by CEA during the same hospitalization or a few weeks later have been described. Hybrid approach with carotid artery stenting (CAS) and CABG can also be an option in selected cases, offering a minimally invasive procedure to treat CS among patients whom CABG cannot be postponed. When carotid intervention is indicated in patients with concomitant CAD requiring CABG, a personalized and tailored approach is mandatory, especially in asymptomatic patients, in order to define the ideal surgical strategy. The aim of this paper is to summarize the current “state of the art” of the different approaches to carotid artery diseases in patients undergoing CABG. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State of the Art in Invasive Vascular Interventions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1415 KiB  
Article
Early and Long-Term Results of Simultaneous and Staged Revascularization of Coronary and Carotid Arteries
by Elena Golukhova, Igor Sigaev, Milena Keren, Inessa Slivneva, Bektur Berdibekov, Nina Sheikina, Olga Kozlova, Valery Arakelyan, Irina Volkovskaya, Tatiana Zavalikhina and Susanna Avakova
Pathophysiology 2024, 31(2), 210-224; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathophysiology31020017 - 13 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1441
Abstract
Background: Carotid artery disease is prevalent among patients with coronary heart disease. The concomitant severe lesions in the carotid and coronary arteries may necessitate either simultaneous or staged revascularization involving coronary bypass and carotid endarterectomy. However, there is presently a lack of consensus [...] Read more.
Background: Carotid artery disease is prevalent among patients with coronary heart disease. The concomitant severe lesions in the carotid and coronary arteries may necessitate either simultaneous or staged revascularization involving coronary bypass and carotid endarterectomy. However, there is presently a lack of consensus on the optimal choice of surgical treatment tactics for patients with significant stenoses in both carotid and coronary arteries. The aim of the current study was to compare the 30-day and long-term outcomes of coronary and carotid artery revascularization surgery based on the simultaneous or staged surgical tactics. Material and Methods: This single-center retrospective study involved 192 patients with concurrent coronary artery disease and carotid artery stenosis ≥ 70%, of whom 106 patients underwent simultaneous intervention (CABG + CEA) and 86 patients underwent staged CABG/CEA. The mean time between stages ranged from 1 to 4 months (mean 1.88 ± 0.9 months). The endpoints included death from any cause, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (death + non-fatal MI + non-fatal stroke) within 30 days after the last intervention and in the long-term follow-up period (median follow-up—6 years). Results: The 30-day all-cause mortality, incidence of postoperative non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, and MACEs did not exhibit differences between the groups after single-stage and staged interventions. However, the overall risk of postoperative complications (adjusted for the risk of any complication per patient) (OR 2.214, 95% CI 1.048–4.674, p = 0.035), as well as the duration of ventilatory support (p = 0.004), was elevated in the group after simultaneous interventions compared with the staged intervention group. This difference did not result in an increased incidence of death and MACEs in the group after simultaneous interventions. In the long-term follow-up period, there were no significant differences observed when comparing simultaneous or staged surgical tactics in terms of overall survival (54.9% and 62.6% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively, P log-rank = 0.068), non-fatal stroke-free survival (45.6% and 33.6% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively, P log-rank = 0.364), non-fatal MI-survival (57.6% and 73.5% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively, P log-rank = 0.169), and MACE-free survival (7.1% and 30.2% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively, P log-rank = 0.060). The risk factors associated with an unfavorable outcome included age, smoking, BMI, LV EF, and atherosclerosis of the lower extremity arteries. Conclusions: This study revealed no significant difference in the impact of simultaneous CABG + CEA or staged CABG/CEA on the incidence of death, stroke, MI, and MACEs over a 30-day and long-term follow-up period. Although the immediate results indicated an increased risk of a complicated course (attributable to overall complications) and more prolonged ventilation after simultaneous CABG + CEA compared with staged CABG/CEA, this did not lead to an increase in fatal complications. Therefore, the implementation of either tactic is considered eligible and appropriate following a thorough operative risk assessment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 735 KiB  
Article
Early-Staged Carotid Artery Stenting Prior to Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Analysis of the Early and Mid-Term Results in Comparison with a Consecutive Cohort of Isolated Coronary Artery Surgery Patients
by Paolo Nardi, Claudia Altieri, Calogera Pisano, Fabio Massimo Oddi, Alessandro Ranucci, Mauro Fresilli, Alessandro Cristian Salvati, Dario Buioni, Mattia Scognamiglio, Valentina Ajello, Carlo Bassano, Andrea Ascoli Marchetti, Arnaldo Ippoliti and Giovanni Ruvolo
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(2), 480; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020480 - 15 Jan 2024
Viewed by 1640
Abstract
Aim: The aim of the present study was to analyze retrospectively the results of patients who underwent early-staged, i.e., within 24–48 h, carotid artery stenting (e-s CAS) before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: Between December 2014 and December 2022, 1046 consecutive patients [...] Read more.
Aim: The aim of the present study was to analyze retrospectively the results of patients who underwent early-staged, i.e., within 24–48 h, carotid artery stenting (e-s CAS) before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: Between December 2014 and December 2022, 1046 consecutive patients underwent CABG; 31 of these patients (3%) were subjected to e-s CAS prior to CABG (e-s CAS + CABG group). Preoperative and intraoperative variables and early and mid-term results of the e-s CAS + CABG group were compared with those of patients who underwent isolated CABG (CABG group). Results: As compared with the CABG group, the e-s CAS + CABG group showed a worse clinical risk profile due to higher Euroscore-2 values and incidence of obstructive pulmonary disease and bilateral carotid artery and peripheral artery diseases (p < 0.05, for all comparisons). The combined end point of operative mortality, periprocedural myocardial infarction, and stroke was 3.2% (0%/0%/3.2%) in the e-s CAS + CABG group vs. 5.9% (2.2%/2.8%/0.9%) in the CABG group (p > 0.5, for all measurements). At 5 years, actuarial survival was 74% ± 16% in the e-s CAS + CABG group vs. 93% ± 4.0% in the CABG group, freedom from cardiac death was 100% vs. 98% ± 1.0% (p = 0.6), and freedom from MACCEs was 85% ± 15% vs. 97% ± 2.5% (p > 0.1, for all comparisons). Independent predictors of all-causes death were advanced age at the operation (p < 0.0001), a lower value for left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.05), and a high Euroscore-2 (p = 0.04). Conclusions: CABG preceded by e-s CAS appears to be associated with satisfactory early outcomes while limiting the risk of myocardial infarction to a very short time interval between the two procedures. Freedom from late all-causes death, cardiac death, and MACCEs were comparable and equally satisfactory, underscoring the positive protective effects of CAS and CABG on the carotid and coronary territories over time. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 266 KiB  
Article
Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Simultaneous Heart Surgery and Carotid Endarterectomy
by Stephen Gerfer, Walid Bennour, Alina Chigri, Ahmed Elderia, Ihor Krasivskyi, Clara Großmann, Christopher Gaisendrees, Borko Ivanov, Soi Avgeridou, Kaveh Eghbalzadeh, Parwis Rahmanian, Ferdinand Kuhn-Régnier, Navid Mader, Ilija Djordjevic, Anton Sabashnikov and Thorsten Wahlers
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2023, 10(8), 330; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10080330 - 2 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2058
Abstract
Background. Patients with simultaneous relevant internal carotid artery stenosis and coronary artery heart or valve disease represent a high-risk collective with respect to cerebral or cardiovascular severe events when undergoing surgery. There exist several concepts regarding the timing and modality of carotid revascularization, [...] Read more.
Background. Patients with simultaneous relevant internal carotid artery stenosis and coronary artery heart or valve disease represent a high-risk collective with respect to cerebral or cardiovascular severe events when undergoing surgery. There exist several concepts regarding the timing and modality of carotid revascularization, which are controversially discussed in patients with heart disease. More data regarding outcome predictors and measures are needed to gain a better understanding of the best treatment option of the discussed patient collective. Methods. This single-center study retrospectively analyzed n = 111 patients undergoing heart surgery with coronary artery bypass grafting or heart-valve surgery and concomitant carotid surgery due to significant internal carotid artery stenosis. In order to do so, patients were divided into two groups with respect to postoperative major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) with thirty-day all-cause mortality, valve related mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and transitory ischemic attack. Results. Preoperative patient’s characteristic in the no-MACCE and MACCE group were mainly balanced, other than higher rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, instable angina pectoris and prior transitory ischemic attack in the MACCE cohort. The analysis of intraoperative characteristics revealed a higher number of intra-aortic balloon pump implantation, which is in line for a higher number of postoperative supports. Besides MACCE, patients suffered significantly more often from postoperative bleeding events and re-thoracotomy, cardiopulmonary reanimation, new onset postoperative dialysis and prolonged intensive care unit stay related complications. Conclusions. Within the reported patient population suffering from MACCE after a simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and heart surgery, a preoperative history of transitory ischemic attack and kidney disease might account for worse outcomes, as severe events were not only neurologically driven but also associated with postoperative cardiovascular complications following heart surgical procedures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiac Surgery)
12 pages, 1127 KiB  
Article
Soluble ST2 in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis—Association with Plaque Morphology and Long-Term Outcome
by Stefan Stojkovic, Stephanie Kampf, Olesya Harkot, Maja Nackenhorst, Mira Brekalo, Kurt Huber, Christian Hengstenberg, Christoph Neumayer, Johann Wojta and Svitlana Demyanets
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(10), 9007; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24109007 - 19 May 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1879
Abstract
Interleukin (IL-33) and the ST2 receptor are implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Soluble ST2 (sST2), which negatively regulates IL-33 signaling, is an established biomarker in coronary artery disease and heart failure. Here we aimed to investigate the association of sST2 with carotid [...] Read more.
Interleukin (IL-33) and the ST2 receptor are implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Soluble ST2 (sST2), which negatively regulates IL-33 signaling, is an established biomarker in coronary artery disease and heart failure. Here we aimed to investigate the association of sST2 with carotid atherosclerotic plaque morphology, symptom presentation, and the prognostic value of sST2 in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. A total of 170 consecutive patients with high-grade asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid artery stenosis undergoing carotid endarterectomy were included in the study. The patients were followed up for 10 years, and the primary endpoint was defined as a composite of adverse cardiovascular events and cardiovascular mortality, with all-cause mortality as the secondary endpoint. The baseline sST2 showed no association with carotid plaque morphology assessed using carotid duplex ultrasound (B 0.051, 95% CI −0.145–0.248, p = 0.609), nor with modified histological AHA classification based on morphological description following surgery (B −0.032, 95% CI −0.194–0.130, p = 0.698). Furthermore, sST2 was not associated with baseline clinical symptoms (B −0.105, 95% CI −0.432–0.214, p = 0.517). On the other hand, sST2 was an independent predictor for long-term adverse cardiovascular events after adjustment for age, sex, and coronary artery disease (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0–2.4, p = 0.048), but not for all-cause mortality (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.8–1.7, p = 0.301). Patients with high baseline sST2 levels had a significantly higher adverse cardiovascular event rate as compared to patients with lower sST2 (log-rank p < 0.001). Although IL-33 and ST2 play a role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, sST2 is not associated with carotid plaque morphology. However, sST2 is an excellent prognostic marker for long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Applications in the Diagnosis and Therapy of Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2401 KiB  
Article
Role of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Severe Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Coronary Artery Endarterectomy within Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
by Ilir Balaj, Heinz Jakob, Ali Haddad, Fanar Mourad, Assad Haneya, Ebrahim Ali, Noura Ryadi, Matthias Thielmann, Arjang Ruhparwar and Sharaf-Eldin Shehada
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2023, 10(3), 112; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10030112 - 7 Mar 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3679
Abstract
Background—Coronary endarterectomy (CEA) has been introduced to allow revascularization in end-stage coronary artery disease (CAD). After CEA, the injured remnants of the vessel’s media could result in fast neo intimal tissue ingrowth, which require an anti-proliferation agent (antiplatelet therapy (APT). We aimed [...] Read more.
Background—Coronary endarterectomy (CEA) has been introduced to allow revascularization in end-stage coronary artery disease (CAD). After CEA, the injured remnants of the vessel’s media could result in fast neo intimal tissue ingrowth, which require an anti-proliferation agent (antiplatelet therapy (APT). We aimed to review outcomes of patients undergoing CEA within bypass surgery who received either single-APT (SAPT) or dual-APT (DAPT). Methods—We retrospectively evaluated 353 consecutive patients undergoing CEA within isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the period 01/2000–07/2019. After surgery, patients received either SAPT (n = 153), or DAPT (n = 200) for six months then lifelong SAPT. Endpoints included early, late survival, and freedom from major-adverse-cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which were defined as incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, need for coronary intervention (PCI or CABG) or death for any cause. Results—Patients’ mean age was 67 ± 9.3 years; they were predominantly male 88.1%. Both DAPT- and SAPT-groups had the same extent of CAD (mean SYNTAX-Score-II: 34.1 ± 11.6 vs. 34.4 ± 17.2, p = 0.91). Postoperatively, no difference between DAPT- and SAPT-groups was reported in the incidence of low-cardiac-output syndrome (5% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.16), revision for bleeding (5% vs. 6.5% p = 0.64), 30-day mortality (4.5% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.8) or MACCE (7.5% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.19). Imaging follow-up reported significantly higher CEA and total grafts patency (90% vs. 81.5% and 95% vs. 81%, p = 0.017) in DAPT patients. Late outcomes within 97.4 ± 67.4 months show lower incidence of overall mortality (19 vs. 51%, p < 0.001) and MACCE (24.5 vs. 58.2%, p < 0.001) in the DAPT patients when compared with SAPT patients. Conclusions—Coronary endarterectomy allows revascularization in end-stage CAD when the myocardium is still viable. The use of dual APT after CEA for at least six months seems to improve mid-to-long-term patency rates and survival, and reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Therapies and Management in Coronary Artery Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2109 KiB  
Article
Effect of Carotid Stenosis Severity on Patterns of Brain Activity in Patients after Cardiac Surgery
by Irina Tarasova, Olga Trubnikova, Darya Kupriyanova, Irina Kukhareva, Irina Syrova, Anastasia Sosnina, Olga Maleva and Olga Barbarash
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010020 - 20 Dec 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1832
Abstract
Background: The negative effects of high-grade carotid stenosis on the brain are widely known. However, there are still insufficient data on the brain state in patients with small carotid stenosis and after isolated or combined coronary and carotid surgery. This EEG-based study aimed [...] Read more.
Background: The negative effects of high-grade carotid stenosis on the brain are widely known. However, there are still insufficient data on the brain state in patients with small carotid stenosis and after isolated or combined coronary and carotid surgery. This EEG-based study aimed to analyze the effect of carotid stenosis severity on associated brain activity changes and the neurophysiological test results in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with or without carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods: One hundred and forty cardiac surgery patients underwent a clinical and neuropsychological examination and a multichannel EEG before surgery and 7–10 days after surgery. Results: The patients with CA stenoses of less than 50% demonstrated higher values of theta2- and alpha-rhythm power compared to the patients without CA stenoses both before and after CABG. In addition, the patients who underwent right-sided CABG+CEA had generalized EEG “slowdown” compared with isolated CABG and left-sided CABG+CEA patients. Conclusions: The on-pump cardiac surgery accompanied by specific re-arrangements of frequency–spatial patterns of electrical brain activity are dependent on the degree of carotid stenoses. The information obtained can be used to optimize the process of preoperative and postoperative management, as well as the search for neuroprotection and safe surgical strategies for this category of patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1650 KiB  
Article
Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Closed Traction Coronary Endarterectomy: A Long-Term Single Center Study
by Sharaf-Eldin Shehada, Fanar Mourad, Ali Haddad, Belal Darwish, Noura Ryadi, Ilir Balaj, Heinz Jakob and Arjang Ruhparwar
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(23), 7026; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237026 - 28 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2172
Abstract
Background—Coronary endarterectomy (CEA) is an option for treating severely diffused coronary artery diseases; however, many surgeons avoid performing it due to its complexity and reported controversial results. Therefore, we aimed to review the results of patients undergoing CEA within coronary artery bypass grafting [...] Read more.
Background—Coronary endarterectomy (CEA) is an option for treating severely diffused coronary artery diseases; however, many surgeons avoid performing it due to its complexity and reported controversial results. Therefore, we aimed to review the results of patients undergoing CEA within coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods—This is a retrospective observational study evaluating the results of patients undergoing CEA within CABG surgery between March 2003 and February 2018. Follow-up via active personal and/or telephone interviews was performed to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes. The study endpoints included early postoperative incidence of myocardial infarction or cardiac mortality, long-term survival, and freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Results—A total of 326 patients were included in this study for evaluation. The patients’ mean age was 67 years; 88% were male, and most presented with three-vessel disease, reporting a mean SYNTAX score of 33.1 ± 12. Approximately 5.5% (n = 18) of the patients had undergone previous CABG surgery. A total of 394 CEAs within a mean of 4.3 ± 1.1 grafts per patient were performed. The indication for CEA was either totally (n = 111, 28.2%) or sub-totally (n = 283, 71.8%) occluded coronary arteries. Early results included perioperative myocardial infarction in eight (2.4%), stroke in eight (2.4%), and in-hospital mortality in thirteen (4.0%) patients. Long-term clinical follow-up reported mortality in 27.6% and overall incidence of MACCE in 41.4% of the patients at the ten-year follow-up. Conclusions—Patients with severe and diffuse CAD are difficult candidates for surgical revascularization. CEA offers an option to allow complete revascularization, even in the case of chronic occlusion, when the myocardium is still viable. The closed traction CEA technique presented here is our preferred method; it achieves satisfactory short- and long-term results. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 946 KiB  
Article
Sex Differences in Ischemic Cerebral Infarction: A Nationwide German Real-Life Analysis from 2014 to 2019
by Claudia Lappe, Holger Reinecke, Jannik Feld and Jeanette Köppe
Clin. Transl. Neurosci. 2022, 6(3), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/ctn6030023 - 12 Sep 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2543
Abstract
Female sex has been shown to be associated with an unfavorable outcome after ischemic stroke. In this nationwide analysis, we evaluate a large dataset of patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke to elucidate the factors associated with an increased risk of mortality after [...] Read more.
Female sex has been shown to be associated with an unfavorable outcome after ischemic stroke. In this nationwide analysis, we evaluate a large dataset of patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke to elucidate the factors associated with an increased risk of mortality after stroke in women. We analyzed a nationwide dataset from the German Federal Bureau of Statistics including 1,577,884 (761,537 female sex, 48.3%) in-hospital cases admitted between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019 with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic cerebral infarction. Patients were analyzed regarding morbidity, treatments and in-hospital mortality. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed, adjusted by patients’ risk profile including age, to evaluate the association of sex and in-hospital mortality. According to the median, women were older than men (79 years vs. 73 years). The multiple logistic regression analysis however revealed female sex remained an independent factor for an increased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–1.14; p < 0.001). Women had a higher prevalence of relevant risk factors, namely arterial hypertension (77.0% vs. 74.7%), arterial fibrillation (33.3% vs. 25.6%), chronic heart failure (12.3% vs. 9.7%), chronic kidney disease (15.6% vs. 12.9%) and dementia (6.6% vs. 4.1%), but were less affected with respect to other relevant co-morbidities such as cerebrovascular disease (11.7% vs. 15.1%), coronary heart disease (11.7% vs. 18.8%), diabetes mellitus (26.4% vs. 29.6%), dyslipidemia (38.1% vs. 42.0%), ischemic heart disease (12.3% vs. 19.3%) and previous coronary artery bypass grafting (1.1% vs. 3.2%). Overall, therapeutic interventions were performed less frequently in women such as carotid endarterectomy (1.1% vs. 2.3%), carotid stent (0.7% vs. 1.4%), as well as hematoma drainage (0.1% vs. 0.2%), and renal replacement therapy (0.4% vs. 0.6%). Conclusions: Our nationwide analysis revealed a higher mortality rate after stroke in women. Nevertheless, women had fewer in-hospital complications and were also less likely to experience the severe effects of some important co-morbidities. The dataset, however, showed that women received surgical or interventional carotid treatments after stroke less often. It is important for research on sex disparities in stroke to keep these treatment frequency differences in mind. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neuroscience/translational neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop