Search Results (12)

Background/Objectives: Colonoscopies have some limitations that result in a miss rate detection of polyps. Microwave imaging has been demonstrated to detect colorectal polyps based on their dielectric properties in synthetic phantoms, ex vivo tissues and in vivo animal models. This study aims to evaluate, for the first time, the feasibility, safety and performance of microwave-based colonoscopy for diagnosis of polyps in real-time explorations in humans. Methods: This was a single-center, prospective, observational study. Patients referred for diagnostic colonoscopy were explored with a device with microwave antennas which was attached to the tip of a standard colonoscope. The primary outcomes were rate of cecal intubation, adverse events, mural injuries and performance metrics for the detection of polyps. Secondary outcomes were the following: patients’ subjective feedback, procedural time and perception of difficulty according to the endoscopist. Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled. Cecal intubation rate was 100%, with a mean time of 12.7 ± 4.9 min (range 4–22). Use of the device did not affect the endoscopic image, and polypectomy was successfully performed in all cases. In on scale from zero (not difficult) to four (very difficult), the maneuverability during the insertion was considered ≤2 in the 86.7% (13/15) of colonoscopies. Only 16 incidents were reported in 14 patients: 11 (67%) superficial hematomas, 2 minor rectal bleedings, 1 anal fissure, 1 rhinorrhea and 1 headache. Most of the patients (94%) reported no discomfort or minimal discomfort before discharge (Gloucester score 1 and 2, respectively). In the six patients with 23 polyps used for the performance analysis, the sensitivity and specificity were 86.9% and 72.0%, respectively. Conclusions: microwave-based colonoscopy is safe and feasible and has the potential to detect polyps in real colonoscopies. Full article

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in Kuwait. The effectiveness of colonoscopy in preventing CRC is dependent on a high adenoma detection rate (ADR). Computer-aided detection can identify (CADe) and characterize polyps in real time and differentiate benign from neoplastic polyps, but its role remains unclear in screening colonoscopy. Methods: This was a randomized-controlled trial (RCT) enrolling patients 45 years of age or older presenting for outpatient screening or surveillance colonoscopy (Kuwait clinical trial registration number 2047/2022). Patients with a history of inflammatory bowel disease, alarm symptoms, familial polyposis syndrome, colon resection, or poor bowel preparation were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned to either high-definition white-light (HD-WL) colonoscopy (standard of care) or HD-WL colonoscopy with the CADe system. The primary outcome was ADR. The secondary outcomes included polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma per colonoscopy (APC), polyp per colonoscopy (PPC), and accuracy of polyp characterization. Results: From 1 September 2022 to 1 March 2023, 102 patients were included and allocated to either the HD-WL colonoscopy group (n = 51) or CADe group (n = 51). The mean age was 52.8 years (SD 8.2), and males represented 50% of the cohort. Screening for CRC accounted for 94.1% of all examinations, while the remaining patients underwent surveillance colonoscopy. A total of 121 polyps were detected with an average size of 4.18 mm (SD 5.1), the majority being tubular adenomas with low-grade dysplasia (47.1%) and hyperplastic polyps (46.3%). There was no difference in the overall bowel preparation, insertion and withdrawal times, and adverse events between the two arms. ADR (primary outcome) was non-significantly higher in the CADe group compared to the HD colonoscopy group (47.1% vs. 37.3%, p = 0.3). Among the secondary outcomes, PDR (78.4% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.02) and PPC (1.35 vs. 0.96, p = 0.04) were significantly higher in the CADe group, but APC was not (0.75 vs. 0.51, p = 0.09). Accuracy in characterizing polyp histology was similar in both groups. Conclusions: In this RCT, the artificial intelligence system showed a non-significant trend towards improving ADR among Kuwaiti patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy compared to HD-WL colonoscopy alone, while it significantly improved the detection of diminutive polyps. A larger multicenter study is required to detect the true effect of CADe on the detection of adenomas. Full article

Background/Aims: A longer cecal intubation time (CIT) occurs during colonoscopy under difficult insertion conditions, which may hinder meticulous mucosal observation. However, whether a longer CIT has detrimental effects on the detection of adenomas remains unclear. We evaluated the effects of CIT on the detection and miss rates of colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic participants. Methods: Healthy examinees who underwent colonoscopy between March and July 2011, August 2015, and December 2016 were retrospectively enrolled. The primary outcome was the adenoma detection rate (ADR) across CIT quartiles, while the secondary outcomes included the mean number of adenomas, advanced ADR (AADR), clinically significant serrated lesion (CSSP) detection, adenoma miss rate (AMR), miss rate of CSSPs and any colorectal neoplasms, and the mean number of missed colorectal neoplasms in relation to CIT. Results: Overall, 12,402 participants were classified into quartiles according to the CIT. The longer the CIT, the lower the ADR (p < 0.001), AADR (p = 0.004), and mean number of adenomas (p < 0.001). The CSSP detection rate was not associated with CIT. On follow-up colonoscopy, AMR showed marginal increase with longer CIT (p = 0.065). The missed rates of CSSPs (p = 0.002) and colorectal neoplasms (p = 0.001) also increased with longer CIT. In the multivariate analysis, CIT was significantly associated with ADR, AADR, and AMR. Conclusions: Longer CIT was associated with lower ADR and higher AMR. Meticulous inspection is important for high-quality colonoscopy, particularly in patients requiring a longer CIT. Full article

Background: By using optimal insertion techniques with water infusion and dynamic position changes, pain during colonoscopy is greatly reduced and the procedures can usually be performed without sedation. We investigated whether the excellent results with water-aided colonoscopy reported by experts are reproducible in daily practice in a regional hospital. Methods: During the year 2023, 500 consecutive outpatients 50–75 years old presenting for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance could choose between unsedated or on-demand minimally sedated colonoscopy, moderate sedation with midazolam, or deep sedation with propofol. A total of 57% opted for unsedated colonoscopy, and of those patients, 250 consecutive patients were included. The primary outcome was the feasibility of the procedure. Cecal intubation rate (CIR), pain scores, use of midazolam, and willingness to repeat future procedures in the same way were registered periprocedural. Additional outcomes were cecal intubation time (CIT), detection rate of lesions, polyp resection rate, rate of adequate bowel preparation, and volume of water aspirated during insertion. Results: 250 consecutive sedation-free or on-demand minimally sedated water-based colonoscopies were analyzed. The CIR was 98%. A total of 96.5% completed without sedation and 5% of the procedures were perceived as moderately painful, but none had severe pain. The willingness to repeat was 97%. The mean CIT was 8.2 min. Conclusions: Using water-aided insertion techniques, comfortable sedation-free, or on-demand minimally sedated colonoscopy in daily practice in a regional hospital is feasible in the vast majority of patients presenting for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance, and the willingness to repeat is very high. Full article

Colonoscopy has a limited field of view because it relies solely on a small camera attached to the end of the scope and a screen displayed on a monitor. Consequently, the quality and safety of diagnosis and treatment depend on the experience and skills of the gastroenterologist. When a novice attempts to insert the colonoscope during the procedure, excessive pressure can sometimes be applied to the colon wall. This pressure can cause a medical accident known as colonic perforation, which the physician should prevent. We propose an assisting device that senses the pressure applied to the colon wall, analyzes the risk of perforation, and warns the physician in real time. Flexible pressure sensors are attached to the surface of the colonoscope shaft. These sensors measure pressure signals during a colonoscopy procedure. A simple signal processor is used to collect and process the pressure signals. In the experiment, a colonoscope equipped with the proposed device was inserted into a simulated colon made from a colon extracted from a pig. The processed data were visually communicated to the gastroenterologist via displays and light-emitting diodes (LEDs). The device helps the physician continuously monitor and prevent excessive pressure on the colon wall. In this experiment, the device appropriately generated and delivered warnings to help the physicians prevent colonic perforation. In the future, the device is to be improved, and more experiments will be performed in live swine models or humans to confirm its efficacy and safety. Full article

With the increasing prevalence of obesity and morbid obesity, this subgroup’s contribution to patients presenting for elective procedures requiring sedation is significant. Gastrointestinal (GI) procedures clearly form the largest group of such procedures. These procedures may be intended to treat obesity such as the insertion of an intragastric balloon or one or more unrelated procedures such as a screening colonoscopy and (or) diagnostic/therapeutic endoscopy. Regardless of the procedure, these patients pose significant challenges in terms of choice of sedatives, dosing, airway management, ventilation, and oxygenation. An understanding of dissimilarity in the handling of different groups of medications used by an anesthesia provider and alterations in airway anatomy is critical for providing safe sedation. Administration of sedative medications and conduct of anesthesia requires dose modifications and airway adjuncts. In this review, we discuss the above issues in detail, with a particular focus on GI endoscopy. Full article

Background: The one-person technique (OPT) for colonoscope insertion is recommended by professional societies and regarded as standard practice. However, the two-person technique (TPT) has shown several advantages over the OPT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the TPT compared to the OPT. Methods: In this prospective study, consecutive individuals presenting for outpatient colonoscopy were randomized to undergo colonoscopy by OPT or by TPT. The colonoscopies were performed by six endoscopists, two of whom were beginners, two with intermediate skills, and two who were experts. The primary endpoints were quality indicators for colonoscopy, including adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, cecal insertion time, and total colonoscopy time. A secondary outcome was procedure tolerability, as assessed by both the patients and the endoscopists. Results: Two hundred and four subjects (117 males, mean age 54.3) were randomized to either one- (n = 102) or two-person (n = 102) colonoscopy. The adenoma detection rate was 30.4% in OPT group and 34.3% in TPT group. (p = 0.55). No significant differences between the two groups were found in terms of cecal intubation rate (98/102 vs. 98/102), insertion time (411 vs. 381 s), and total examination time (1426 vs. 1296 s). However, patients receiving the TPT had lower pain scores than patients receiving the OPT. Endoscopist fatigue measured with the FACIT-F was also significantly lower in the TPT group. Conclusion: The two-person colonoscopy method was not shown to be technically or clinically inferior. Rather, the TPT can improve patient tolerance and reduce endoscopist fatigue. Full article

Small bowel tumors are relatively rare, representing only around 5% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms, with a progressively increasing incidence. Currently, there are no established guidelines for diagnostic approaches, screening procedures, or management strategies for small bowel tumors. We present here the case of a patient with a rare type of metastatic tumor of the small bowel originating from primary lung adenocarcinoma who presented with abdominal pain, severe iron-deficiency anemia, and melena. The initial investigations, gastroscopy and colonoscopy, failed to identify the bleeding source. The obscure bleeding source and diagnosis were achieved through power motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE), which allowed the visualization and biopsy of the tumor. Histopathological examination established the presence of a poorly differentiated non-mucinous adenocarcinoma originating from the lung. This case is reported to provide evidence of the efficiency of MSE in the diagnosis of small bowel tumors, with the method providing higher insertion depth in a reduced amount of time. Full article

Pneumatosis cystoid intestinalis (PCI) is a rare condition, with a worldwide incidence of 0.3–1.2%. PCI is classified into primary (idiopathic) and secondary forms, with 15% and 85% of presentations, respectively. This pathology was associated with a wide variety of underlining etiologies to explain the abnormal accumulation of gas within the submucosa (69.9%), subserosa (25.5%), or both layers (4.6%). Many patients endure misdiagnosis, mistreatment, or even inadequate surgical exploration. In this case, a patient presented acute diverticulitis, after treatment, a control colonoscopy was performed that found multiple rounds and elevated lesions. To further study the subepithelial lesion (SEL), a colorectal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was performed with an overtube in the same procedure. For safe insertion of the curvilinear array EUS, an overtube with colonoscopy was positioned through the sigmoid as described by Cheng et al. The EUS evaluation evidenced air reverberation in the submucosal layer. The pathological analysis was consistent with PCI’s diagnosis. The diagnosis of PCI is usually made by colonoscopy (51.9%), surgery (40.6%), and radiological findings (10.9%). Although the diagnosis can be made by radiological studies, a colorectal EUS and colonoscopy can be made in the same section without radiation and with high precision. As it is a rare disease, there are not enough studies to define the best approach, although colorectal EUS should be preferred for a reliable diagnosis. Full article

Background: The use of an endoscopic position detection unit (UPD) enables better and more objective understanding of the shape and position of the colonoscope. Here, we investigated the reproducibility of the insertion of a colonoscope with UPD. Materials and Methods: Study participants were 122 patients who received a colonoscopy with UPD twice for the purpose of large bowel screening and surveillance. The mean age of participants was 69.7 ± 10.4 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 9.2:1. The colonoscope insertion technique was primarily based on the shaft-holding, shortening insertion method. The cecal intubation time was recorded; the method used for passing through the sigmoid/descending colon junction (SDJ) and the hepatic flexure. Results: The mean cecal intubation time was 990 ± 511 s. The cecal intubation time and the patterns for passing through the SDJ and hepatic flexure were significantly correlated between the first and second colonoscopies. Conclusion: Use of a UPD revealed good reproducibility of colonoscope insertion. This is the first time we have proved that both time and pattern are inserted in much the same way for the first and second times. In patients’ conducted UPD combination TCS after the second time, it was suggested that individual tailor-made insertions are possible based on the information from the first time. Full article

Randomized control trials and meta-analyses comparing colonoscopies with and without computer-aided detection (CADe) assistance showed significant increases in adenoma detection rates (ADRs) with CADe. A major limitation of CADe is its false positives (FPs), ranked 3rd in importance among 59 research questions in a modified Delphi consensus review. The definition of FPs varies. One commonly used definition defines an FP as an activation of the CADe system, irrespective of the number of frames or duration of time, not due to any polypoid or nonpolypoid lesions. Although only 0.07 to 0.2 FPs were observed per colonoscopy, video analysis studies using FPs as the primary outcome showed much higher numbers of 26 to 27 per colonoscopy. Most FPs were of short duration (91% < 0.5 s). A higher number of FPs was also associated with suboptimal bowel preparation. The appearance of FPs can lead to user fatigue. The polypectomy of FPs results in increased procedure time and added use of resources. Re-training the CADe algorithms is one way to reduce FPs but is not practical in the clinical setting during colonoscopy. Water exchange (WE) is an emerging method that the colonoscopist can use to provide salvage cleaning during insertion. We discuss the potential of WE for reducing FPs as well as the augmentation of ADRs through CADe. Full article

Solid tumors shed DNA into circulation, and there is growing evidence that the detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has broad clinical utility, including monitoring of disease, prognosis, response to chemotherapy and tracking tumor heterogeneity. The appearance of ctDNA in the circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) isolated from plasma or serum is commonly detected by identifying tumor-specific features such as insertions, deletions, mutations and/or aberrant methylation. Methylation is a normal cell regulatory event, and since the majority of ccfDNA is derived from white blood cells (WBC), it is important that tumour-specific DNA methylation markers show rare to no methylation events in WBC DNA. We have used a novel approach for assessment of low levels of DNA methylation in WBC DNA. DNA methylation in 29 previously identified regions (residing in 17 genes) was analyzed in WBC DNA and eight differentially-methylated regions (DMRs) were taken through to testing in clinical samples using methylation specific PCR assays. DMRs residing in four genes, BCAT1, GRASP, IKZF1 and IRF4, exhibited low positivity, 3.5% to 7%, in the plasma of colonoscopy-confirmed healthy subjects, with the sensitivity for detection of ctDNA in colonoscopy-confirmed patients with colorectal cancer being 65%, 54.5%, 67.6% and 59% respectively. Full article