Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (38)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 910 KiB  
Article
Antimicrobial Effect of Gentamicin/Heparin and Gentamicin/Citrate Lock Solutions on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Strains
by Daniel Salas-Treviño, Arantxa N. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, María T. Ramírez-Elizondo, Magaly Padilla-Orozco, Edeer I. Montoya-Hinojosa, Paola Bocanegra-Ibarias, Samantha Flores-Treviño and Adrián Camacho-Ortiz
Infect. Dis. Rep. 2025, 17(4), 98; https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17040098 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infection (HD-CRBSIs) is a main cause of morbidity in hemodialysis. New preventive strategies have emerged, such as using lock solutions with antiseptic or antibiotic capacity. In this study, the antimicrobial effect was analyzed in vitro and with a catheter [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infection (HD-CRBSIs) is a main cause of morbidity in hemodialysis. New preventive strategies have emerged, such as using lock solutions with antiseptic or antibiotic capacity. In this study, the antimicrobial effect was analyzed in vitro and with a catheter model of lock solutions of gentamicin (LSG), gentamicin/heparin (LSG/H), and gentamicin/citrate (LSG/C) in clinical and ATCC strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Methods: The formation, minimum inhibitory concentration, and minimum inhibitory concentration of the biofilm and minimum biofilm eradication concentration of the lock solutions were determined. Additionally, colony-forming unit assays were performed to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of the lock solutions in a hemodialysis catheter inoculation model. Results: The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of planktonic cells of both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus for LSG/H and LSG/C was 4 µg/mL. In the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) tests, the LSG/H was less effective than LSG/C, requiring higher concentrations for inhibition, contrary to the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC), where LSG/H was more effective. All lock solutions eradicated P. aeruginosa biofilms in the HD catheter model under standard conditions. Nevertheless, under modified conditions, the lock solutions were not as effective versus ATCC and clinical strains of S. aureus. Conclusions: Our analysis shows that the lock solutions studied managed to eradicate intraluminal mature P. aeruginosa in non-tunneled HD catheters under standard conditions. Biofilm inhibition and eradication were observed at low gentamicin concentrations, which could optimize the gentamicin concentration in lock solutions used in HD catheters. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 235 KiB  
Article
Effectiveness of Vascular Catheter Removal Versus Retention in Non-ICU Patients with CRBSI or CABSI in Retrospective, Single-Center Study
by Giovanni De Capitani, Marta Colaneri, Claudia Conflitti, Fabio Borgonovo, Lucia Galli, Giovanni Scaglione, Camilla Genovese, Rebecca Fattore, Monica Schiavini, Beatrice Caloni, Daniele Zizzo, Nicola Busatto, Antonio Gidaro, Alba Taino, Maria Calloni, Francesco Casella, Arianna Bartoli, Chiara Cogliati, Emanuele Palomba, Spinello Antinori, Andrea Gori and Antonella Foschiadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Microorganisms 2025, 13(5), 1085; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13051085 - 7 May 2025
Viewed by 571
Abstract
Catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CABSIs) and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are significant causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The current practice favors the removal of vascular access devices (VADs); however, the evidence on this topic remains inconclusive. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes in [...] Read more.
Catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CABSIs) and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are significant causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The current practice favors the removal of vascular access devices (VADs); however, the evidence on this topic remains inconclusive. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes in terms of in-hospital mortality and catheter retention vs. removal in CABSI and CRBSI cases. A retrospective, observational, single-center study was conducted at Luigi Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy (May 2021–December 2023), and it analyzed non-ICU adult patients with VADs diagnosed with CRBSIs or CABSIs. Clinical and microbiological data were collected to assess the outcomes based on catheter management. Among 1874 patients with VADs, 147 were included, with 164 VAD infection events (92 CABSIs and 72 CRBSIs). Overall, 35 (23.8%) patients with CABSIs and CRBSIs died. Out of those who retained the catheter 19 (35.8%) patients died, while among removal patients 16 (17%) died (p = 0.018). A Candida spp. isolation was found to be significantly associated with a higher likelihood of catheter removal (p = 0.04). Our findings suggest that, in non-ICU CRBSI and CABSI cases, VAD removal may be associated with improved outcomes when feasible. Full article
11 pages, 683 KiB  
Article
Antimicrobial Lock Therapy: A Strategy for Managing Catheter-Related Bacteremia
by Firdevs Aksoy, Hanife Nur Karakoc Parlayan, Gulter Oncu Kurutas and Gurdal Yilmaz
Antibiotics 2025, 14(5), 461; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14050461 - 30 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1728
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the use and efficacy of antibiotic-lock therapy (ALT) in the management of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs), focusing on its impact on infection resolution, catheter retention, and clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with CRBSIs who [...] Read more.
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the use and efficacy of antibiotic-lock therapy (ALT) in the management of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs), focusing on its impact on infection resolution, catheter retention, and clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with CRBSIs who had long-term indwelling catheters and for whom catheter replacement posed clinical challenges were enrolled in the retrospective study from January 2019 to December 2024. Participants were divided into two groups based on treatment: Group 1 received intravenous (IV) antibiotics combined with antibiotic-lock therapy (ALT), while Group 2 received IV antibiotics alone. Patient demographics, pathogen distribution, administered antibiotic regimens, duration of treatment, laboratory parameters, clinical outcomes, and mortality rates were evaluated. Results: A total of 54 patients were included, of whom 42.6% were female, and the mean age was 66.3 ± 15.4 years. Group 1 comprised 50% of the study population. The median treatment duration was 14 days. The most common pathogen was Coagulase-negative staphylococci, and 33.3% of CRBSIs were caused by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). Group 1 demonstrated lower C-reactive protein levels at treatment 48/72 h of treatment (p = 0.013) and a reduced frequency of catheter revision (p < 0.0001) compared to Group 2. Overall, ALT achieved a success rate of 88.9%, with success rates of 86% for GNB infections and 90% for Gram-positive bacterial infections. Among patients receiving daily ALT, the success rate was 86%, while those receiving the therapy every three days had a success rate of 90%. Conclusions: Antimicrobial lock therapy can be considered a treatment option for managing CRBSIs, particularly in cases where removal of the implantable catheter is not feasible, allowing for salvage. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 2048 KiB  
Systematic Review
Antimicrobial Lock Therapy in Clinical Practice: A Scoping Review
by Aniello Alfieri, Sveva Di Franco, Maria Beatrice Passavanti, Maria Caterina Pace, Vittorio Simeon, Paolo Chiodini, Sebastiano Leone and Marco Fiore
Microorganisms 2025, 13(2), 406; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13020406 - 13 Feb 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3541
Abstract
Antimicrobial lock therapy (ALT) prevents microbial colonization in central vein catheters and treats existing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs); the ALT assessment involves several key considerations. First, identifying which patients are suitable candidates is crucial. Additionally, understanding the clinical contexts in which is utilised [...] Read more.
Antimicrobial lock therapy (ALT) prevents microbial colonization in central vein catheters and treats existing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs); the ALT assessment involves several key considerations. First, identifying which patients are suitable candidates is crucial. Additionally, understanding the clinical contexts in which is utilised provides insight into its applications. Examining when ALT has been employed and analyzing trends in its use over time can highlight its evolving role in patient care. Equally important is understanding how ALT is administered, including the specific agents used. Lastly, determining whether there is sufficient existing literature is essential to evaluate the feasibility of conducting future systematic reviews. This study is a scoping review adhered to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and followed a five-stage methodological framework. Of the 1024 studies identified, 336 were included in the analysis. Findings highlight the widespread use of ethanol and taurolidine for CRBSIs prevention and the concurrent use of ALT with systemic antimicrobials to treat CRBSIs without catheter removal. ALT improves clinical outcomes, including post-infection survival and catheter retention. From our analysis, we have concluded that both an umbrella review of systematic reviews and a network meta-analysis comparing lock solutions can provide clearer guidance for clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Medical Microbiology in Italy (2023, 2024))
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1682 KiB  
Article
Reusable Tourniquets as Potential Transmitters of Infection: A Microbiological Analysis
by Julia Szymczyk, Monika Kurpas, Bartosz Krasiński, Katarzyna Zorena and Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska
Microorganisms 2025, 13(1), 152; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13010152 - 13 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1865
Abstract
Introduction: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) pose a significant global challenge, resulting in prolonged hospital stays, higher healthcare costs, and increased morbidity and mortality rates. Reusable medical equipment, such as tourniquets, represents a potential vector for infection transmission. Despite frequent use and close contact with [...] Read more.
Introduction: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) pose a significant global challenge, resulting in prolonged hospital stays, higher healthcare costs, and increased morbidity and mortality rates. Reusable medical equipment, such as tourniquets, represents a potential vector for infection transmission. Despite frequent use and close contact with patients’ skin, infection control protocols often overlook these devices. This study examines microbial contamination on the surface of reusable tourniquets in both emergency department and operating theatre settings. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between March and September 2024 in Gdansk, Poland. Samples from tourniquets used in the emergency department and the operating theatre were collected after an indefinite period, 14 days, and 28 days. Bacterial contamination on the surfaces of the tourniquets was measured using Columbia agar blood medium and expressed as colony-forming units (CFUs) per cm2. Results: Significant bacterial loads were detected on reusable tourniquets, with contamination levels varying by location and duration of use. The average number of CFU/cm2 across all stages of this study was 545 CFU/cm2 for the emergency department and 101 CFU/cm2 for the operating theatre. Tourniquets used in the emergency department exhibited higher bacterial counts compared to those from the operating theatre, which showed a greater diversity of bacterial species. These findings underscore the need to revise infection control protocols for reusable tourniquets. Conclusion: This study provides critical data that may influence future policy changes aimed at reducing the risk of HAIs through the improved management of reusable medical devices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Public Health Microbiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 266 KiB  
Review
Central Vascular Access Devices: Current Standards and Future Implications
by Benito Baldauf, Roberto Cemin, Jana Hummel, Hendrik Bonnemeier and Ojan Assadian
J. Vasc. Dis. 2025, 4(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/jvd4010003 - 8 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2698
Abstract
Background: Central venous access devices (CVADs) are crucial for various medical conditions, but pose risks, including catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI). CRBSI increases comorbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Surveillance and evidence-based guidelines have successfully reduced CRBSI rates, although the COVID-19 pandemic has led to [...] Read more.
Background: Central venous access devices (CVADs) are crucial for various medical conditions, but pose risks, including catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI). CRBSI increases comorbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Surveillance and evidence-based guidelines have successfully reduced CRBSI rates, although the COVID-19 pandemic has led to increased infection rates. Main body: This review explores strategies for reducing the incidence of CRBSI and examines factors contributing to variations in reported rates across developed countries. Highlighting the significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare resource burden associated with CRBSI, the analysis delves into evidence-backed preventive measures. It discusses the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on infection rates and proposes resilient strategies in response to these challenges. The review emphasises the importance of understanding CRBSI pathogenesis, patient, procedure, and device-related risk factors, and the implementation of evidence-guided algorithms and surveillance measures. Recommendations include the use of all-inclusive procedure packs, ultrasound-guided placement, daily dressing changes with antimicrobial treatment, and the use of antimicrobial locks. Conclusions: The review underscores the need for clear, concise algorithms adaptable to various healthcare settings and the scalability of infection prevention systems to ensure resilience. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Peripheral Vascular Diseases)
12 pages, 578 KiB  
Article
Vascular Access Device Infections: Current Management Practices and the Role of Multidisciplinary Teams at a Large Hospital in Northern Italy
by Marta Colaneri, Lucia Galli, Martina Offer, Fabio Borgonovo, Giovanni Scaglione, Camilla Genovese, Rebecca Fattore, Monica Schiavini, Giovanni De Capitani, Maria Calloni, Arianna Bartoli, Antonio Gidaro, Chiara Cogliati, Spinello Antinori, Andrea Gori and Antonella Foschi
Antibiotics 2025, 14(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14010027 - 3 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1416
Abstract
Introduction: Vascular access device (VAD)-associated infections, including catheter-related (CRBSI) and catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CABSI), present significant challenges in patient care. While multidisciplinary VAD teams (VATs) are equipped with protocols for managing these infections, adherence to these guidelines in real-life practice is inconsistent. [...] Read more.
Introduction: Vascular access device (VAD)-associated infections, including catheter-related (CRBSI) and catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CABSI), present significant challenges in patient care. While multidisciplinary VAD teams (VATs) are equipped with protocols for managing these infections, adherence to these guidelines in real-life practice is inconsistent. This study aims to evaluate the alignment between actual VAD infection management practices and VAT-recommended protocols. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study at Luigi Sacco Hospital (May 2021–October 2023) involving non-ICU adult patients with diagnosed CRBSI or CABSI. VAT experts independently reviewed infection management choices, which were divided into eight specific procedural options. These options included variations in VAD removal, timing of repositioning, and combinations of antimicrobial lock therapy and systemic therapy. Concordance between real-life practices and VAT recommendations was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa coefficient. Results: Of 2419 VAD placements, 146 (6%) developed infections (84 CABSI, 62 CRBSI). Clinicians removed VADs in 66.4% of cases compared to 62.3% per VAT recommendations, with moderate overall agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.58). Analysis of the eight management categories revealed moderate to low alignment (unweighted kappa = 0.44, weighted kappa = 0.30) between real-life practices and VAT guidance, with slightly improved concordance in CRBSI cases. Conclusions: Our findings underscore a discrepancy between real-life VAD infection management and VAT-recommended protocols, suggesting a need for clearer, more accessible guidelines and increased multidisciplinary collaboration. Enhanced VAT consultation and simplified protocol dissemination may improve consistency in infection management and ultimately lead to better patient outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 697 KiB  
Systematic Review
Outcomes for Patients Receiving Multi-Chamber Bags for the Delivery of Parenteral Nutrition: A Systematic Review
by Debra Jones, Karen Allsopp, Anne Marie Sowerbutts, Simon Lal, Kirstine Farrer, Simon Harrison and Sorrel Burden
Nutrients 2024, 16(22), 3964; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16223964 - 20 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1619
Abstract
Background: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is required by people with intestinal failure and can be delivered as multi-chambered bags (MCBs) or individually compounded (COM) bags. This systematic review aimed to examine the evidence base for clinical outcomes and/or quality of life (QoL) in adults [...] Read more.
Background: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is required by people with intestinal failure and can be delivered as multi-chambered bags (MCBs) or individually compounded (COM) bags. This systematic review aimed to examine the evidence base for clinical outcomes and/or quality of life (QoL) in adults receiving PN as MCBs compared to COMs in hospital and community settings. Methods: A systematic database search was conducted between January 2015 and May 2024. Studies assessing adults in receipt of MCBs were included. Quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs appraisal tools. A narrative synthesis was performed due to study heterogeneity. PROSPERO: CRD42022352806. Results: Ten studies including 87,727 adults were included, with 20,192 receiving PN from MCBs and 67,535 from COMs. Eight studies reported on PN given in hospital and two in the home. Five hospital-based and one home-based study reported that MCBs were well tolerated and provided adequate nutrition. Three hospital-based studies reported that MCBs had lower post-operative infections and a lower mean risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Two home-based studies reported no difference in CRBSI. Five hospital-based studies reported no difference between groups in length of hospital stay. Three hospital-based studies reported the cost to be lower for MCBs than COMs, and no studies reported QoL. Conclusions: The studies included show that MCBs provided in hospital are safe and non-inferior to COMs and may be more cost-effective. There were few high-quality studies and no data on QoL; therefore, further work is required to improve the certainty of the evidence and to establish the level of QoL when using MCBs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutritional Support for Gastrointestinal Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 240 KiB  
Article
The Effectiveness of Taurolidine Antimicrobial Locks in Preventing Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections (CRBSIs) in Children Receiving Parenteral Nutrition: A Case Series
by Galina Ling, Shalom Ben-Shimol, Siham Elamour, Raouf Nassar, Eyal Kristal, Rotem Shalev, Gadi Howard, Baruch Yerushalmi, Slava Kogan and Moshe Shmueli
Antibiotics 2024, 13(9), 847; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090847 - 5 Sep 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1728
Abstract
Introduction: We assessed the efficacy of taurolidine lock (TL) in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) and related hospitalizations in children with parenteral nutrition (PN) in the home setting. Methods: This study is a retrospective case series study. All children with intestinal failure in [...] Read more.
Introduction: We assessed the efficacy of taurolidine lock (TL) in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) and related hospitalizations in children with parenteral nutrition (PN) in the home setting. Methods: This study is a retrospective case series study. All children with intestinal failure in a single center in southern Israel who were administered PN and treated with TL between 2017 and 2024 were included. The rates of CRBSI episodes, related hospitalizations and pathogen distribution in the pre-TL and post-TL periods were compared. Results: Overall, 14 patients were included. The median pre-TL and post-TL periods were 990 and 1260 days, respectively. The rate of CRBSI episodes due to bacterial infection per 1000 days declined by 45%, from 6.2 to 3.7, with p = 0.0008, while fungal CRBSI rates were low (<10% of all positive cultures) and did not decline significantly. Similarly, the hospitalization episode rate per 1000 days declined by 41%, from 7.6 to 4.5, with p = 0.001. Conclusions: Taurolidine lock treatment for children with central-line PN resulted in a substantial decrease in CRBSI episodes and related hospitalizations. Full article
12 pages, 252 KiB  
Article
A Local Experience of Antibiotic Lock Therapy as an Adjunctive Treatment for Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Pediatric Oncology and Hematology Patients
by Elena de Frutos Porras, Elvira Cobo-Vázquez, Alicia Hernanz Lobo, María del Mar Santos Sebastián, Elia Pérez Fernández, Carmen Garrido Colino, Elena Cela and María Luisa Navarro Gómez
Children 2024, 11(8), 983; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11080983 - 14 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1585
Abstract
Background: One of the main drawbacks of tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) is catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Antibiotic lock therapy (ALT) can be combined with systemic antibiotics to achieve catheter salvage. Our objectives are to describe cases of CRBSI and our experience with [...] Read more.
Background: One of the main drawbacks of tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) is catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Antibiotic lock therapy (ALT) can be combined with systemic antibiotics to achieve catheter salvage. Our objectives are to describe cases of CRBSI and our experience with ALT in a pediatric oncology–hematology ward. Methods: a retrospective descriptive study of pediatric CRBSI cases in a Spanish oncology–hematology unit from 2007 to 2017 was conducted. We collected demographic, clinical, and microbiological data from all patients. Results: fifty-eight CRBSIs were diagnosed in thirty-nine patients; 72.9% of these patients were male, with a median age of 42.1 months. The main underlying diseases were leukemia/lymphoma (51.7%) and solid tumors (32.7%). Thirty-five (60.3%) CRBSIs were caused by Gram-positive cocci, of which 70.6% were coagulase-negative Staphylococci, and sixteen (27.6%) were caused by Gram-negative bacilli. We treated 41/58 (71%) cases with ALT. A total of 12/17 (71%) CVCs that were not treated with adjunctive ALT were removed, compared with 13/41 (32%) that were treated with ALT (relative risk (RR), 0.449; confidence interval (CI), 95%: 0.259–0.778, p = 0.004). Major reasons to remove the CVC in the CRBSI-ALT group were local insertion/pocket site infection (23%), persistent symptoms (23%), and infectious’ relapses (15%). Conclusions: ALT was shown to be an effective approach to keeping the CVC in place, with no added adverse effects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Hematology & Oncology)
11 pages, 1173 KiB  
Article
Epidemiology and Clinical Insights of Catheter-Related Candidemia in Non-ICU Patients with Vascular Access Devices
by Giovanni Scaglione, Marta Colaneri, Martina Offer, Lucia Galli, Fabio Borgonovo, Camilla Genovese, Rebecca Fattore, Monica Schiavini, Alba Taino, Maria Calloni, Francesco Casella, Antonio Gidaro, Federico Fassio, Valentina Breschi, Jessica Leoni, Chiara Cogliati, Andrea Gori and Antonella Foschi
Microorganisms 2024, 12(8), 1597; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12081597 - 6 Aug 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2246
Abstract
Introduction: Vascular access devices (VADs), namely peripheral VADs (PVADs) and central venous VADs (CVADs), are crucial in both intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU settings. However, VAD placement carries risks, notably catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Candida spp. is a common pathogen in CRBSIs, [...] Read more.
Introduction: Vascular access devices (VADs), namely peripheral VADs (PVADs) and central venous VADs (CVADs), are crucial in both intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU settings. However, VAD placement carries risks, notably catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Candida spp. is a common pathogen in CRBSIs, yet its clinical and microbiological characteristics, especially in non-ICU settings, are underexplored. Methods: We conducted a monocentric, retrospective observational study at Luigi Sacco Hospital from 1 May 2021 to 1 September 2023. We reviewed medical records of non-ICU adult patients with CVADs and PVADs. Data on demographics, clinical and laboratory results, VAD placement, and CRBSI occurrences were collected. Statistical analysis compared Candida spp. CRBSI and bacterial CRBSI groups. Results: Out of 1802 VAD placements in 1518 patients, 54 cases of CRBSI were identified, and Candida spp. was isolated in 30.9% of episodes. The prevalence of CRBSI was 3.05%, with Candida spp. accounting for 0.94%. Incidence rates were 2.35 per 1000 catheter days for CRBSI, with Candida albicans and Candida non-albicans at 0.47 and 0.26 per 1000 catheter days, respectively—patients with Candida spp. CRBSI had more frequent SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 pneumonia, and hypoalbuminemia. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Candida spp. was a notable cause of CRBSIs in our center, underscoring the importance of considering Candida spp. in suspected CRBSI cases, including those in non-ICU settings and in those with PVADs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Infections and Antifungal Strategies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1122 KiB  
Review
Short Course Antibiotic Therapy for Catheter-Related Septic Thrombosis: “Caveat Emptor!”: Duration of Therapy Should Not Be Set a Priori
by Alberto Enrico Maraolo, Giancarlo Ceccarelli, Mario Venditti and Alessandra Oliva
Pathogens 2024, 13(7), 529; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13070529 - 22 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2150
Abstract
There is a growing body of evidence showing no significant difference in clinical outcomes in patients with uncomplicated Gram-negative bloodstream infections (BSIs) receiving 7 or 14 days of therapy. However, the scenario may differ when complicated forms of BSI, such as catheter-related BSIs [...] Read more.
There is a growing body of evidence showing no significant difference in clinical outcomes in patients with uncomplicated Gram-negative bloodstream infections (BSIs) receiving 7 or 14 days of therapy. However, the scenario may differ when complicated forms of BSI, such as catheter-related BSIs (CRBSIs) burdened by septic thrombosis (ST), are considered. A recent study showed that a short course of antimicrobial therapy (≤3 weeks) had similar outcomes to a prolonged course on CRBSI-ST. From this perspective, starting from the desirable goal of shortening the treatment duration, we discuss how the path to the correct diagnosis and management of CRBSI-ST may be paved with several challenges. Indeed, patients with ST due to Gram-negative bacteria display prolonged bacteremia despite an indolent clinical course, requiring an extended course of antibiotic treatment guided by negative FUBCs results, which should be considered the real driver of the decision-making process establishing the length of antibiotic therapy in CRBSI-ST. Shortening treatment of complicated CRBSIs burdened by ST is ambitious and advisable; however, a dynamic and tailored approach driven by a tangible outcome such as negative FUBCs rather than a fixed-duration paradigm should be implemented for the optimal antimicrobial duration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 234 KiB  
Communication
Clinical Outcome of Patients with Escherichia coli Isolated from Catheter Lumens and/or Peripheral Blood Cultures: A Retrospective Analysis
by Álvaro Irigoyen-von-Sierakowski, Marta Díaz-Navarro, Andrés Visedo, Mª Jesús Pérez-Granda, Pablo Martín-Rabadán, Patricia Muñoz and María Guembe
Pathogens 2024, 13(6), 446; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13060446 - 24 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1214
Abstract
Background. Escherichia coli commonly causes catheter-related bloodstream infection (C-RBSI) in specific populations. The differential time to positivity (DTTP) technique is the recommended conservative procedure for diagnosing C-RBSIs. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study of episodes in which E. coli was isolated from catheter [...] Read more.
Background. Escherichia coli commonly causes catheter-related bloodstream infection (C-RBSI) in specific populations. The differential time to positivity (DTTP) technique is the recommended conservative procedure for diagnosing C-RBSIs. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study of episodes in which E. coli was isolated from catheter lumens obtained using the DTTP technique. Microbiological and clinical data were obtained based on the DTTP technique as either catheter colonization, C-RBSI, or non-C-RBSI. Results. A total of 89 catheter blood cultures were included, classified as follows: catheter colonization, 33.7%; C-RBSI, 9.0%; and non-C-RBSI, 57.3%. Only 15.7% of the catheters were withdrawn, with no positive catheter-tip cultures. We found no statistically significant differences in catheter type, antibiotic treatment, or clinical outcome among the groups, except for the frequency of catheter lock therapy or in the frequency of successful treatment. Mortality was associated with C-RBSI in only one patient. Conclusion. E. coli bacteremia diagnosed by the DTTP technique was classified as non-catheter-related in most patients. As the majority of the catheters were retained, E. coli bacteremia could not be microbiologically confirmed as catheter-related by the catheter-tip culture. Future studies are needed to assess the profitability of the DTTP technique for diagnosing E. coli C-RBSIs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Pathogens)
11 pages, 728 KiB  
Article
Ready-to-Use Multichamber Bags in Home Parenteral Nutrition for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Single-Center Prospective Study
by María Fernández-Argüeso, Elena Gómez-Bayona, Beatriz Ugalde, Belén Vega-Piñero, Mayra Gil-Díaz, Federico Longo, Rosario Pintor and José I. Botella-Carretero
Nutrients 2024, 16(3), 457; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16030457 - 5 Feb 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2226
Abstract
Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is increasingly prescribed for patients with advanced cancer. This therapy improves free-fat mass, quality of life and survival, but it is not free from complications, especially catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). The use of commercial multichamber bags in HPN has [...] Read more.
Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is increasingly prescribed for patients with advanced cancer. This therapy improves free-fat mass, quality of life and survival, but it is not free from complications, especially catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). The use of commercial multichamber bags in HPN has not been extensively explored in oncologic patients and their association with complications is not well known. In this prospective cohort study, we included 130 patients with advanced cancer and HPN. We compared the effects of individual compounded bags (n = 87) vs. commercial multichamber bags (n = 43) on complications. There were no differences in any complication, including thrombosis (p > 0.05). There were 0.28 episodes of CRBSI per 1000 catheter days in the individual compounded bag group and 0.21 in the multichamber bag group (p > 0.05). A total of 34 patients were weaned off HPN, 22 with individual bags and 12 with multichamber bags (p = 0.749). Regarding survival when on HPN, the group with individual bags showed a median of 98 days (95% CI of 49–147), whereas those with multichamber bags showed a median of 88 days (95% CI of 43–133 (p = 0.913)). In conclusion, commercial multichamber bags for HPN in patients with advanced cancer are non-inferior when compared to individual compounded bags in terms of complications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer and Nutrition: From Epidemiology to Medical Nutrition Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 8043 KiB  
Article
Complications of Central Venous Access Devices Used in Palliative Care Settings for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Clement Chun-Him Wong, Horace Cheuk-Wai Choi and Victor Ho-Fun Lee
Cancers 2023, 15(19), 4712; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15194712 - 25 Sep 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2540
Abstract
(1) Background: Central venous access devices (CVADs) have been commonly employed during various courses of anticancer treatment. Currently, there are a few types of clinically available CVADs, which are associated with short-term and long-term complications. However, little is known about the complication rates [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Central venous access devices (CVADs) have been commonly employed during various courses of anticancer treatment. Currently, there are a few types of clinically available CVADs, which are associated with short-term and long-term complications. However, little is known about the complication rates when CVADs are used only in palliative care settings. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all the published literature to evaluate the complication rates of CVADs in this clinical setting. (2) Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to identify publications from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and trial registries. Publications reporting the complication rates of PICCs, central lines, and PORTs in palliative settings for terminally ill cancer patients were included, while those on the use of systemic anticancer therapy and peripheral venous catheters were excluded. The outcome measures included overall complication rate, rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), and rate of thromboembolism (TE). This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023404489). (3) Results: Five publications with 327 patients were analyzed, including four studies on PICCs and one study on central lines. No studies on PORTs were eligible for analysis. The overall complication rate for PICCs (pooled estimate 7.02%, 95% CI 0.27–19.10) was higher than that for central lines (1.44%, 95% CI 0.30–4.14, p = 0.002). The risk of CRBSI with PICCs (2.03%, 95% CI 0.00–9.62) was also higher than that with central lines (0.96%, 95% CI 0.12–3.41, p = 0.046). PICCs also had a trend of a higher risk of TE (2.10%, 95% CI 0.00–12.22) compared to central lines (0.48%, 95% CI 0.01–2.64, p = 0.061). (4) Conclusions: PICCs for palliative cancer care were found to have greater complications than central lines. This might aid in the formulation of future recommendation guidelines on the choice of CVAD in this setting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Supportive and Palliative Care in Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop