Smart building services are increasingly realised through combinations of sensors, actuators, communication infrastructures, software platforms, analytics, and artificial intelligence-based functions. These configurations enable adaptive control, real-time monitoring, contextual automation, predictive support, user interaction, and cross-domain coordination across heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, energy
[...] Read more.
Smart building services are increasingly realised through combinations of sensors, actuators, communication infrastructures, software platforms, analytics, and artificial intelligence-based functions. These configurations enable adaptive control, real-time monitoring, contextual automation, predictive support, user interaction, and cross-domain coordination across heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, energy management, security and access control, water management, and user-centric comfort services. At the same time, the European Union Smart Readiness Indicator provides a formal basis for assessing building smartness through technical domains, service functionalities, and multidimensional impact criteria. A systematic basis for translating real-world descriptions of smart building services and their enabling technology stacks into Smart Readiness Indicator-aligned assessment inputs remains underdeveloped. A PRISMA ScR informed review was conducted to identify principal smart building service domains, synthesise their core functionalities, and reconstruct the digital technologies through which these functionalities are realised. The synthesis shows that heating, ventilation, and air conditioning and lighting provide comparatively direct translation pathways to formal Smart Readiness Indicator domains, while energy management operates mainly as a supervisory and cross-domain layer. Security and access control, water management, and several user-centric services contribute meaningfully to building smartness but often show partial or extended formal correspondence. Monitoring and control emerge as a central cross-cutting layer because many higher-order smart building capabilities are expressed through visibility, supervision, orchestration, and digital representation. Building on this review, a methodological framework is established for translating smart building services into Smart Readiness Indicator-aligned assessments. The procedure uses the smart building service instance as the unit of analysis and links service identification, functionality formulation, technology stack reconstruction, formal domain correspondence, impact profiling, maturity classification, and building-level aggregation. This enables heterogeneous service descriptions to be converted into structured readiness profiles while preserving the distinction between operational functionality, enabling technology, formal assessment correspondence, and multidimensional impact contribution. Application of the framework to the IoT Building Cloud platform shows that a substantial share of smart building capability may derive from supervisory digital infrastructure rather than from isolated end-use control alone. The resulting readiness profile is characterised by strong representation in monitoring and control, information to occupants and operators, and maintenance awareness, together with more selective contributions to indoor environmental control and limited flexibility-related capability. The proposed framework supports Smart Readiness Indicator-aligned pre-assessment, comparative analysis, design stage reasoning, and digital tool development by providing a transparent bridge between smart building service descriptions and formal assessment-oriented interpretation.
Full article