Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (600)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = anesthesia control

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 501 KiB  
Article
Nurse-Led Binaural Beat Intervention for Anxiety Reduction in Pterygium Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
by Punchiga Ratanalerdnawee, Mart Maiprasert, Jakkrit Klaphajone, Pongsiri Khunngam and Phawit Norchai
Nurs. Rep. 2025, 15(8), 282; https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080282 (registering DOI) - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 145
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Anxiety before ophthalmic surgery under local anesthesia may hinder patient cooperation and surgical outcomes. Nurse-led auditory interventions offer a promising non-pharmacological approach to perioperative anxiety management. This study evaluated the effectiveness of superimposed binaural beats (SBBs)—classical music layered with frequency differentials—in [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Anxiety before ophthalmic surgery under local anesthesia may hinder patient cooperation and surgical outcomes. Nurse-led auditory interventions offer a promising non-pharmacological approach to perioperative anxiety management. This study evaluated the effectiveness of superimposed binaural beats (SBBs)—classical music layered with frequency differentials—in reducing anxiety during pterygium surgery with conjunctival autografting. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 111 adult patients scheduled for elective pterygium excision with conjunctival autografting under local anesthesia were allocated to one of three groups: SBBs, plain music (PM), or silence (control). A trained perioperative nurse administered all auditory interventions. The patients’ anxiety was assessed using the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory—State (STAI-S), and physiological parameters (blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation) were recorded before and after surgery. Results: The SBB group showed significantly greater reductions in their STAI-S scores (p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.011), heart rate (p = 0.003), and respiratory rate (p = 0.009) compared to the PM and control groups. No adverse events occurred. Conclusions: SBBs are a safe, nurse-delivered auditory intervention that significantly reduces perioperative anxiety and supports physiological stability. Their integration into routine nursing care for minor ophthalmic surgeries is both feasible and beneficial. Trial Registration: This study was registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) under registration number TCTR20250125002 on 25 January 2025. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mental Health Nursing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2048 KiB  
Article
Ultrasound-Guided PECS II Block Reduces Periprocedural Pain in Cardiac Device Implantation: A Prospective Controlled Study
by Mihaela Butiulca, Florin Stoica Buracinschi and Alexandra Lazar
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1389; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081389 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 178
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasingly performed in elderly and comorbid patients, for whom minimizing perioperative complications—including pain and systemic drug use—is critical. Traditional local infiltration often provides insufficient analgesia. The ultrasound-guided PECS II block, an [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasingly performed in elderly and comorbid patients, for whom minimizing perioperative complications—including pain and systemic drug use—is critical. Traditional local infiltration often provides insufficient analgesia. The ultrasound-guided PECS II block, an interfascial regional technique, offers promising analgesic benefits in thoracic wall procedures but remains underutilized in cardiac electrophysiology. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective, controlled, non-randomized clinical study including 106 patients undergoing de novo CIED implantation. Patients were assigned to receive either a PECS II block (n = 53) or standard lidocaine-based local anesthesia (n = 53). Pain intensity was assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS) intraoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the need for rescue analgesia, procedural duration, length of hospitalization, and patient satisfaction. Results: Patients in the PECS II group reported significantly lower NRS scores at all time points (mean intraoperative score: 2.1 ± 1.2 vs. 5.7 ± 1.6, p < 0.001; at 1 h: 2.5 ± 1.5 vs. 6.1 ± 1.7, p < 0.001). Rescue analgesia (metamizole sodium) was required in only four PECS II patients (7.5%) vs. 100% in the control group within 1 h. Hospital stay and procedural time were also modestly reduced in the PECS II group. Patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the intervention group. Conclusions: The ultrasound-guided PECS II block significantly reduces perioperative pain and the need for additional analgesia during CIED implantation, offering an effective, safe, and opioid-sparing alternative to conventional local infiltration. Its integration into clinical protocols for device implantation may enhance procedural comfort and recovery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regional and Local Anesthesia for Enhancing Recovery After Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 220 KiB  
Review
Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Occipital Craniotomies: A Narrative Review
by Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Bennett M. Ford, Alex V. Hollander, Mary Kathleen Luetkemeier, Tomasina Q. Parker-Actlis and Sahar Shekoohi
Med. Sci. 2025, 13(3), 101; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030101 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 349
Abstract
Post-craniotomy pain is common yet often sub-optimally managed because systemic opioids can obscure postoperative neurologic examinations. The superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) has, therefore, emerged as a targeted regional anesthesia option for occipital craniotomies. The SCPB targets the C2–C4 nerves to anesthetize the [...] Read more.
Post-craniotomy pain is common yet often sub-optimally managed because systemic opioids can obscure postoperative neurologic examinations. The superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) has, therefore, emerged as a targeted regional anesthesia option for occipital craniotomies. The SCPB targets the C2–C4 nerves to anesthetize the occipital scalp region, covering the lesser occipital nerve territory that lies within typical posterior scalp incisions. Clinical evidence shows the block is effective in reducing acute postoperative pain after occipital craniotomy and diminishes opioid requirements. Studies have demonstrated successful and long-lasting analgesia, reductions in 24-h opioid consumption, and a lower incidence of severe pain. Moreover, the technique exhibits a low complication rate and is safer than a deep cervical plexus block because the injection remains superficial and avoids critical vascular and neural structures. When delivered under ultrasound guidance, major adverse events are exceedingly rare. By reducing opioid use, the SCPB can help reduce postoperative complications, allowing earlier neurological assessments and fewer opioid-related side effects. Incorporation of the SCPB into multimodal analgesia regimens can, therefore, accelerate postoperative recovery by providing regionally focused, opioid-sparing pain control without clinically significant sedation. Overall, current data support the SCPB as a dependable, well-tolerated, and clinically practical approach for managing post-craniotomy pain in patients undergoing occipital approaches. In this narrative review, we will discuss the mechanism of action and anatomy, the clinical application, safety and tolerability, patient outcomes, and emerging future directions of the superficial cervical plexus block and how it mitigates post-occipital craniotomy pain. Full article
12 pages, 1159 KiB  
Article
The Protective Effect of Thiamine and Thiamine Pyrophosphate Against Linezolid-Induced Oxidative Liver Damage and Lactic Acidosis in Rats
by Bahar Isik, Irem Ates, Nurinisa Yucel, Bahadir Suleyman, Ali Sefa Mendil, Esra Tuba Sezgin and Halis Suleyman
Antioxidants 2025, 14(8), 920; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14080920 - 27 Jul 2025
Viewed by 416
Abstract
Linezolid, an antimicrobial agent, has been linked to lactic acidosis, oxidative stress, and liver damage. Oxidative stress is considered to play a key role in this damage. Thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP), the active form of thiamine, may prevent lactate accumulation and enhance aerobic capacity. [...] Read more.
Linezolid, an antimicrobial agent, has been linked to lactic acidosis, oxidative stress, and liver damage. Oxidative stress is considered to play a key role in this damage. Thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP), the active form of thiamine, may prevent lactate accumulation and enhance aerobic capacity. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the protective effect of TPP against possible linezolid-induced liver damage and lactic acidosis in rats. Twenty-four male Wistar albino rats were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 6): healthy control (HG), linezolid (LZD), thiamine plus linezolid (TLZD), and TPP plus linezolid (TPLZD). Thiamine and TPP (20 mg/kg, intraperitoneal (i.p.)) were administered once daily, while linezolid (125 mg/kg, per os (p.o.)) was given twice daily (250 mg/kg/day) for 28 days. Animals were euthanized under high-dose anesthesia (with 50 mg/kg, i.p. thiopental sodium). Liver tissues were analyzed for MDA, tGSH, SOD, and CAT, and examined histopathologically. Blood samples were collected prior to euthanasia to assess lactate, LDH, ALT, AST, and TPP levels. In the LZD group, MDA, lactate, ALT, AST, and LDH levels significantly increased, while tGSH, SOD, CAT, and TPP decreased (p < 0.001). Histopathology showed hydropic degeneration, necrosis, and mononuclear cell infiltration (p < 0.05). Thiamine did not prevent these alterations (p > 0.05), whereas TPP significantly prevented both biochemical and histopathological changes (p < 0.05), indicating its protective efficacy. TPP may offer significant protection against linezolid-induced hepatotoxicity and lactic acidosis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 234 KiB  
Review
Endovascular Treatment of Stroke and Anesthesia Technique: What Is the Best Approach, According to the Literature?
by Federica Arturi, Gabriele Melegari, Fabio Gazzotti, Elisabetta Bertellini and Alberto Barbieri
Neurol. Int. 2025, 17(8), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17080115 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 270
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Endovascular thrombectomy has become a mainstay in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion. Among the multiple factors that influence outcomes, the choice of anesthetic technique—general anesthesia (GA), conscious sedation (CS), or local anesthesia (LA)—remains controversial. This narrative [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Endovascular thrombectomy has become a mainstay in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion. Among the multiple factors that influence outcomes, the choice of anesthetic technique—general anesthesia (GA), conscious sedation (CS), or local anesthesia (LA)—remains controversial. This narrative review aims to critically examine and synthesize current evidence comparing the efficacy and safety of different anesthetic strategies in endovascular stroke treatment. Methods: A structured search of the PubMed® database was conducted using the terms “stroke treatment”, “endovascular stroke treatment”, “anesthesia”, “general anesthesia”, “conscious sedation”, and “local anesthesia”. The search focused on clinical trials involving human subjects published in English. Studies were included if they compared at least two anesthetic techniques during thrombectomy and reported outcomes such as neurological recovery, mortality, or complication rates. Reviews, case reports, and animal studies were excluded. Results: Several randomized controlled trials and observational studies show comparable functional outcomes between GA and CS, though CS may confer advantages in early neurological recovery and reduced complications. Local anesthesia, though less studied, may offer favorable outcomes in selected patients. General anesthesia appears to be associated with greater hemodynamic variability and a higher risk of post-procedural infections, particularly in unsuccessful interventions. Maintaining stable blood pressure and minimizing ventilation duration are crucial to improving patient prognosis. Conclusions: While both GA and CS are viable options during thrombectomy, CS and LA may provide a safer profile in selected patients by preserving hemodynamic stability and reducing infectious risk. Personalized anesthetic strategies and further high-quality trials are warranted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Movement Disorders and Neurodegenerative Diseases)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

12 pages, 236 KiB  
Article
Should an Anesthesiologist Be Interested in the Patient’s Personality? Relationship Between Personality Traits and Preoperative Anesthesia Scales of Patients Enrolled for a Hip Replacement Surgery
by Jakub Grabowski, Agnieszka Maryniak, Dariusz Kosson and Marcin Kolacz
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5227; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155227 - 24 Jul 2025
Viewed by 252
Abstract
Background: Preparing patients for surgery considers assessing the patient’s somatic health, for example by the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scale or the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), known as the Lee index. This process usually ignores mental functioning (personality and anxiety), which [...] Read more.
Background: Preparing patients for surgery considers assessing the patient’s somatic health, for example by the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scale or the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), known as the Lee index. This process usually ignores mental functioning (personality and anxiety), which is known to influence health. The purpose of this study is to analyze the existence of a relationship between personality traits (the Big Five model and trait-anxiety) and anesthesia scales (ASA scale, Lee index) used for the preoperative evaluation of patients. Methods: The study group comprised 102 patients (59 women, 43 men) scheduled for hip replacement surgery. Patients completed two psychological questionnaires: the NEO-FFI (NEO Five Factors Inventory) and the X-2 STAI (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) sheet. Next, the presence and possible strength of the relationship between personality traits and demographic and medical variables were analyzed using Spearman’s rho rank correlation coefficient. Results: Patients with a high severity of trait anxiety are classified higher on the ASA scale (rs = 0.359; p < 0.001). Neuroticism, defined according to the Big Five model, significantly correlates with scales of preoperative patient assessment: the ASA classification (rs = 0.264; p < 0.001) and the Lee index (rs = 0.202; p = 0.044). A hierarchical regression model was created to test the possibility of predicting ASA scores based on personality. It explained more than 34% of the variance and was a good fit to the data (p < 0.05). The controlled variables of age and gender accounted for more than 23% of the variance. Personality indicators (trait anxiety, neuroticism) additionally accounted for slightly more than 11% of the variance. Trait anxiety (Beta = 0.293) proved to be a better predictor than neuroticism (Beta = 0.054). Conclusions: These results indicate that inclusion of personality screening in the preoperative patient evaluation might help to introduce a more individualized approach to patients, which could result in better surgical outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Perioperative Anesthesia: State of the Art and the Perspectives)
10 pages, 842 KiB  
Review
Comparison of Intraosseous and Conventional Dental Anesthesia in Children—A Scoping Review
by Anastasia Dermata, Sotiria Davidopoulou, Aristidis Arhakis, Nikolaos Dabarakis, Konstantinos N. Arapostathis and Sotirios Kalfas
Dent. J. 2025, 13(7), 326; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13070326 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 264
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The main purpose of the present scoping review was to map and explore the efficacy of computer-controlled intraosseous anesthesia (CCIA) in comparison with conventional dental anesthesia in pediatric dental patients. Secondarily, this study aimed to compare the acceptance and preference factors [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The main purpose of the present scoping review was to map and explore the efficacy of computer-controlled intraosseous anesthesia (CCIA) in comparison with conventional dental anesthesia in pediatric dental patients. Secondarily, this study aimed to compare the acceptance and preference factors between CCIA and conventional dental anesthesia in children. Given the limited and heterogeneous nature of the available literature, this review aimed to identify gaps and scope the extent of research conducted in this area, providing a foundation for future, more targeted studies. Methods: The search was conducted in 19 electronic databases, and the appropriate studies were identified according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Only split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trials that reported on the clinical outcomes of CCIA in children were included. Two reviewers worked independently on the screening and selection of the studies. The same two reviewers carried out the data extraction and the risk of bias assessment, using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Due to the exploratory nature, this review focused on mapping the characteristics, outcomes, and research trends rather than synthesizing effect sizes. Results: Out of 841 papers, 2 randomized clinical trials were ultimately included in the scoping review. The outcomes were categorized as primary (including results that answered the focus question) and secondary (relating to additional quality characteristics). Regarding the primary outcomes, in both studies, intraosseous anesthesia was efficacious in achieving the adequate level of anesthesia. One of the secondary outcomes was the acceptance and preference of CCIA in comparison with conventional dental anesthesia in children. The limited number and the high risk of bias in existing studies highlight the necessity for more comprehensive and high-quality research. Conclusions: The selected studies support the assertion that CCIA is a promising technique since it results in less pain perception and is preferred by patients compared to conventional local anesthesia. However, the existing literature is limited and at high risk of bias. Thus, further targeted investigations are needed to evaluate and yield more definitive results regarding the superiority of CCIA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Advances in Pediatric Odontology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2247 KiB  
Article
Feasibility of Hypotension Prediction Index-Guided Monitoring for Epidural Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
by Okechukwu Aloziem, Hsing-Hua Sylvia Lin, Kourtney Kelly, Alexandra Nicholas, Ryan C. Romeo, C. Tyler Smith, Ximiao Yu and Grace Lim
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 5037; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14145037 - 16 Jul 2025
Viewed by 445
Abstract
Background: Hypotension following epidural labor analgesia (ELA) is its most common complication, affecting approximately 20% of patients and posing risks to both maternal and fetal health. As digital tools and predictive analytics increasingly shape perioperative and obstetric anesthesia practices, real-world implementation data are [...] Read more.
Background: Hypotension following epidural labor analgesia (ELA) is its most common complication, affecting approximately 20% of patients and posing risks to both maternal and fetal health. As digital tools and predictive analytics increasingly shape perioperative and obstetric anesthesia practices, real-world implementation data are needed to guide their integration into clinical care. Current monitoring practices rely on intermittent non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements, which may delay recognition and treatment of hypotension. The Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) algorithm uses continuous arterial waveform monitoring to predict hypotension for potentially earlier intervention. This clinical trial evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of continuous HPI-guided treatment in reducing time-to-treatment for ELA-associated hypotension and improving maternal hemodynamics. Methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial design involving healthy pregnant individuals receiving ELA. Participants were randomized into two groups: Group CM (conventional monitoring with NIBP) and Group HPI (continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring). In Group HPI, hypotension treatment was guided by HPI output; in Group CM, treatment was based on NIBP readings. Feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability outcomes were assessed among subjects and their bedside nurse using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) instruments. The primary efficacy outcome was time-to-treatment of hypotension, defined as the duration between onset of hypotension and administration of a vasopressor or fluid therapy. This outcome was chosen to evaluate the clinical responsiveness enabled by HPI monitoring. Hypotension is defined as a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg for more than 1 min in Group CM and an HPI threshold < 75 for more than 1 min in Group HPI. Secondary outcomes included total time in hypotension, vasopressor doses, and hemodynamic parameters. Results: There were 30 patients (Group HPI, n = 16; Group CM, n = 14) included in the final analysis. Subjects and clinicians alike rated the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the continuous monitoring device highly, with median scores ≥ 4 across all domains, indicating favorable perceptions of the intervention. The cumulative probability of time-to-treatment of hypotension was lower by 75 min after ELA initiation in Group HPI (65%) than Group CM (71%), although this difference was not statistically significant (log-rank p = 0.66). Mixed models indicated trends that Group HPI had higher cardiac output (β = 0.58, 95% confidence interval −0.18 to 1.34, p = 0.13) and lower systemic vascular resistance (β = −97.22, 95% confidence interval −200.84 to 6.40, p = 0.07) throughout the monitoring period. No differences were found in total vasopressor use or intravenous fluid administration. Conclusions: Continuous monitoring and precision hypotension treatment is feasible, appropriate, and acceptable to both patients and clinicians in a labor and delivery setting. These hypothesis-generating results support that HPI-guided treatment may be associated with hemodynamic trends that warrant further investigation to determine definitive efficacy in labor analgesia contexts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Anesthesiology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 1773 KiB  
Systematic Review
Immunomodulatory Effects of Anesthetic Techniques in Lung Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Georgios Konstantis, Ilias Katsadouros, Georgia Tsaousi, Vasileios Grosomanidis and Chryssa Pourzitaki
Medicina 2025, 61(7), 1263; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071263 - 12 Jul 2025
Viewed by 249
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Lung cancer represents one of the principal causes of cancer-associated mortality worldwide. Despite the numerous novel therapeutic agents, surgical resection remains, in many cases, the mainstay treatment. A growing body of evidence indicates that the anesthetic technique of choice [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Lung cancer represents one of the principal causes of cancer-associated mortality worldwide. Despite the numerous novel therapeutic agents, surgical resection remains, in many cases, the mainstay treatment. A growing body of evidence indicates that the anesthetic technique of choice contributes to perioperative immunosuppression, thus having an impact on cancer recurrence and prognosis. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a thorough summary of the current literature regarding the modulation of the immune response induced by the various anesthetic techniques that are used in lung cancer surgery, with a particular emphasis on cellular immunity. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane databases were systematically searched from November 2023 up to March 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the eligibility criteria. Results: A total of seven RCTs were included. Four of the RCTs compared the administration of general anesthesia alone versus general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia. The subsequent meta-analysis showed that the combination of general and epidural anesthesia exerted a positive impact on the cell counts of the CD3+ cells (SMD −0.42, 95% Cl −0.70 to −0.13 24 h postoperatively and SMD −0.86 95% Cl −1.48 to −0.23 72 h postoperatively), the CD4+ cells (SMD −0.41 95% Cl −0.69 to −0.12 at the end of surgery and SMD −0.56 95% Cl −0.85 to −0.27 72 h later), and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio (SMD −0.31 95% Cl −0.59 to −0.02 immediately after surgery, SMD −0.50 95% Cl −0.86 to −0.14 24 h postoperatively, and SMD −0.60 95% Cl −0.89 to −0.31 72 h later). The pooled results regarding CD8+ and NK cell counts were inconclusive. The remaining three studies compared volatile-based anesthesia with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Due to disparities between these studies, qualitative analysis was inconclusive, whereas quantitative analysis was not feasible. Conclusions: The supplementation of general anesthesia with epidural anesthesia favorably impacts CD3+ and CD4+ cell counts, as well as the CD4+/CD8+ ratio. The present results and the effects of anesthetic technique on other immune cells must be consolidated with further high-quality studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 886 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Two Initial Effect-Site Concentrations of Remifentanil with Propofol During Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Under Monitored Anesthesia Care: A Randomized Controlled Study with Titration-Based Adjustment
by Shih-Syuan Lin, Zhi-Fu Wu, Hou-Chuan Lai, Ching-Lung Ko, Ting-Yi Sun, Kun-Ting Hong, Kai-Li Lo, Tzu-Hsuan Yeh and Wei-Cheng Tseng
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4669; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134669 - 1 Jul 2025
Viewed by 352
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is often performed under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) using a combination of propofol and remifentanil. However, the effects of different remifentanil effect-site concentrations (Ce) combined with propofol on perioperative outcomes in this procedure have not been reported. Methods: In [...] Read more.
Background: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is often performed under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) using a combination of propofol and remifentanil. However, the effects of different remifentanil effect-site concentrations (Ce) combined with propofol on perioperative outcomes in this procedure have not been reported. Methods: In this prospective, randomized controlled study, 80 patients scheduled for single-level PVP under MAC were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to receive propofol (Ce: 2.0 mcg/mL) combined with either a low (1.0 ng/mL; Group 1) or high (2.0 ng/mL; Group 2) remifentanil Ce. The primary outcome was the incidence of intraoperative patient movement; secondary outcomes included hemodynamic stability, perioperative adverse events, anesthetic consumption, frequency of dose adjustments, postoperative recovery, and anesthesia satisfaction. Results: Group 2 exhibited significantly fewer episodes of patient movement during the procedure and better intraoperative hemodynamic stability. Additionally, fewer upward adjustments in remifentanil infusion were observed in Group 2. Although the total propofol consumption was similar between the groups, Group 2 required a significantly lower propofol Ce to achieve adequate sedation. Surgeon satisfaction with anesthesia was also significantly higher in Group 2. Conclusions: Using a higher remifentanil Ce (2.0 ng/mL) in combination with propofol during PVP under MAC reduces patient movement and improves intraoperative hemodynamic stability without increasing adverse events. This regimen may thereby enhance procedural efficiency and surgeon satisfaction during vertebral interventions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Anesthesiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 941 KiB  
Article
Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs. Facemask on Arterial Oxygenation During Liver Radiofrequency Ablation: Randomized Controlled Trial
by Jung-Pil Yoon, Go Wun Kim, Ji-Uk Yoon, Hyeonsoo Park and Kyoung-woon Joung
Medicina 2025, 61(7), 1130; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071130 - 23 Jun 2025
Viewed by 371
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Percutaneous liver radiofrequency ablation (RFA) under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) carries a risk of hypoxia due to respiratory depression. Ensuring adequate oxygenation during such procedures is essential for patient safety. This study aimed to evaluate whether a high-flow nasal [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Percutaneous liver radiofrequency ablation (RFA) under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) carries a risk of hypoxia due to respiratory depression. Ensuring adequate oxygenation during such procedures is essential for patient safety. This study aimed to evaluate whether a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) improves oxygenation compared to a simple facemask during RFA. Materials and Methods: In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 51 patients undergoing ultrasound-guided RFA under MAC were allocated to receive oxygen via an HFNC (30 L/min) or a facemask (6 L/min). Arterial blood gases were collected at the baseline and 5 min after oxygenation. The primary outcome was the arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2). Secondary outcomes included hypoxia incidence (SpO2 < 95%), the difference in the ratio of the arterial partial pressure of oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen concentration (ΔP/F ratio), the difference in the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (ΔPaCO2), respiratory rate (RR) changes, and patient satisfaction. Results: After adjustment for the baseline PaO2, the HFNC group showed significantly higher intra-procedural PaO2 compared to the facemask group (299 ± 18.6 vs. 194 ± 19.0 mmHg, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the ΔP/F ratio, ΔPaCO2, or patient satisfaction. Among the secondary outcomes, RR was more stable in the HFNC group throughout the procedure (Group × Time interaction, p = 0.003). Conclusions: The HFNC significantly improved intra-procedural PaO2 during RFA under MAC but did not reduce hypoxia incidence or improve other clinical outcomes compared to facemask oxygenation. The stability of RR observed with the HFNC may reflect a physiological advantage, though further studies are needed to determine its clinical relevance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Intensive Care/ Anesthesiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 2427 KiB  
Review
Procedural Pain Management in Patients with Cerebral Palsy Undergoing Botulinum Toxin Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Silvia Faccioli, Alessandro Ehsani, Shaniko Kaleci, Giulia Tonini, Ilaria Tagliani, Mario Vetrano and Silvia Sassi
Toxins 2025, 17(7), 317; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17070317 - 22 Jun 2025
Viewed by 576
Abstract
Background: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate effectiveness and safety of sedation–analgesia techniques in controlling pain during botulinum injections in patients with cerebral palsy (CP). Methods: The Pubmed, Cinahl, and Scopus databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were as follows: cerebral [...] Read more.
Background: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate effectiveness and safety of sedation–analgesia techniques in controlling pain during botulinum injections in patients with cerebral palsy (CP). Methods: The Pubmed, Cinahl, and Scopus databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were as follows: cerebral palsy; any type of outcome measure regarding pain and side effects assessment; any type of studies; and English language. RoB2 and Robins-I were applied to assess the risk of bias. Tables and forest plots synthetized the findings. Results: Seventeen reports were included; most regarded pain control, and ten investigated side effects. Three were RCTs, three were controlled, and twelve were observational studies. Several techniques were used, often in combination, such as non-pharmacological approaches (clown care or virtual reality); topical anesthesia with Emla®®, vapocoolant spray, or ice; and light-to-deep sedation with inhaled nitrous oxide, intranasal fentanyl, rectal, enteral, or intravenous midazolam, or intravenous ketamine or propofol. Vomiting and oxygen desaturation were uncommon complications. Conversely, the pooled incidence of other minor side effects was 6.39% (95% CI: 1.47–14.42%) under the random-effects model, with considerable heterogeneity. Conclusions: All the techniques are safe, if administered in an appropriate setting. Deep sedation is more effective in pain control but requires an anesthetist. A combined individualized approach is preferrable. PROSPERO CRD42025639999. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 555 KiB  
Review
Comprehensive Approaches to Pain Management in Postoperative Spinal Surgery Patients: Advanced Strategies and Future Directions
by Dhruba Podder, Olivia Stala, Rahim Hirani, Adam M. Karp and Mill Etienne
Neurol. Int. 2025, 17(6), 94; https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17060094 - 18 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1242
Abstract
Effective postoperative pain management remains a major clinical challenge in spinal surgery, with poorly controlled pain affecting up to 50% of patients and contributing to delayed mobilization, prolonged hospitalization, and risk of chronic postsurgical pain. This review synthesizes current and emerging strategies in [...] Read more.
Effective postoperative pain management remains a major clinical challenge in spinal surgery, with poorly controlled pain affecting up to 50% of patients and contributing to delayed mobilization, prolonged hospitalization, and risk of chronic postsurgical pain. This review synthesizes current and emerging strategies in postoperative spinal pain management, tracing the evolution from opioid-centric paradigms to individualized, multimodal approaches. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) has become the cornerstone of contemporary care, combining pharmacologic agents, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, and gabapentinoids, with regional anesthesia techniques, including erector spinae plane blocks and liposomal bupivacaine. Adjunctive nonpharmacologic modalities like early mobilization, cognitive behavioral therapy, and mindfulness-based interventions further optimize recovery and address the biopsychosocial dimensions of pain. For patients with refractory pain, neuromodulation techniques such as spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulation offer promising results. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), biomarker discovery, and nanotechnology are poised to enhance personalized pain protocols through predictive modeling and targeted drug delivery. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, which integrate many of these strategies, have been shown to reduce opioid use, hospital length of stay, and complication rates. Nevertheless, variability in implementation and the need for individualized protocols remain key challenges. Future directions include AI-guided analytics, regenerative therapies, and expanded research on long-term functional outcomes. This review provides an evidence-based framework for pain control following spinal surgery, emphasizing integration of multimodal and innovative approaches tailored to diverse patient populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pain Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1140 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Propofol and Dexmedetomidine Infused Overnight to Treat Hyperactive and Mixed ICU Delirium: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial
by Stefan Zimmermann, Alexa Hollinger, Rita Achermann, Stefanie von Felten, Raoul Sutter, Stephan Rüegg, Salim Abdelhamid, Simon Glatz, Luzius A. Steiner and Martin Siegemund
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4348; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124348 - 18 Jun 2025
Viewed by 777
Abstract
Background: Delirium is a frequent yet pathophysiologically still poorly understood complication in the intensive care unit (ICU) and is associated with adverse outcomes for the patients. Currently, guidelines give several recommendations for treating delirium in the ICU, but to date no sufficient drug [...] Read more.
Background: Delirium is a frequent yet pathophysiologically still poorly understood complication in the intensive care unit (ICU) and is associated with adverse outcomes for the patients. Currently, guidelines give several recommendations for treating delirium in the ICU, but to date no sufficient drug treatment exists. Dexmedetomidine, primarily used for anesthesia and sedation in ICUs has shown a preventive effect of delirium compared to other sedatives, such as propofol. We hypothesize that overnight administration of dexmedetomidine may prevent and/or shorten the duration of delirium in ICU patients. Methods: The Basel propofol dexmedetomidine (BaProDex) Study was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial. We included adult ICU patients with hyperactive or mixed delirium. Patients with delirium prior to ICU admission, advanced heart block, uncontrolled hypotension, or status epilepticus were excluded. The participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to either receive dexmedetomidine (study group) or propofol (control group) as a continuous infusion overnight. The Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) was applied at least three times per day. Delirium was defined as an ICDSC ≥ 4. The study drug was administered until the end of delirium or ICU discharge. The primary endpoint was the time to delirium episode end, which was analyzed using cumulative incidence curves and a cause specific Cox proportional hazards regression with death as a competing risk. Secondary endpoints included recurrence of delirium until 28 days after ICU discharge, death until day 28, severity of ICU delirium, number of ventilation days, ICU length of stay (LOS) in hours, hospital length of stay in days and survival after three and twelve months after ICU discharge. Due to insufficient recruitment the trial needed to be stopped prematurely. Results: In total, 38 patients were enrolled and randomized in the two groups. The median duration of delirium was shorter in the dexmedetomidine group as compared to the propofol group (ITT: 34 vs. 66 h; PP: 31 vs. 66 h), resulting in a hazard ratio of 1.92 (95% CI 0.89–4.15, p = 0.097) in the ITT and 2.95 (95% CI 1.27–6.86, p = 0.012) in the PP analysis. In the PP analysis, the 28-day mortality was lower in the dexmedetomidine group (1 vs. 5 deaths) and fewer patients needed ventilation (7 vs. 15 patients). Both ICU and hospital LOS were shorter in the dexmedetomidine group (ICU LOS: median 43 vs. 128 h; hospital LOS: median 12 vs. 22 days). Further, mortality up to three and twelve months was lower in the dexmedetomidine group compared to the propofol group (PP: 2 vs. 8 patients died within twelve months, 2 vs. 7 patients died within three months). The recurrence of delirium until 28 days after ICU discharge and severity of delirium were similar in both groups. Conclusions: Despite premature termination, BaProDex provides preliminary evidence for a reduction in the duration of delirium by nocturnal infusion of dexmedetomidine compared to propofol. Therefore, dexmedetomidine may be considered an option to treat hyperactive or mixed delirium in ICU patients. However, due to the small sample size, the study is rather of exploratory nature due to the premature termination, and we cannot rule out that the observed treatment effect is overly optimistic or by chance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Intensive Care)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 414 KiB  
Article
Fast-Track Protocol for Carotid Surgery
by Noemi Baronetto, Stefano Brizzi, Arianna Pignataro, Fulvio Nisi, Enrico Giustiniano, David Barillà and Efrem Civilini
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4294; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124294 - 17 Jun 2025
Viewed by 680
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Fast-track (FT) protocols have been developed to reduce the surgical burden and enhance recovery, but they still need to be established for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). In this scenario, carotid stenting has gained momentum by answering the need for a less invasive treatment, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Fast-track (FT) protocols have been developed to reduce the surgical burden and enhance recovery, but they still need to be established for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). In this scenario, carotid stenting has gained momentum by answering the need for a less invasive treatment, despite a still debated clinical advantage. We aim to propose a FT protocol for CEA and to analyze its clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective, monocentric study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent CEA for asymptomatic carotid stenosis using an FT protocol between January 2016 and December 2024. Patients undergoing CEA for symptomatic carotid stenosis, carotid bypass procedures, and combined interventions were excluded. Our FT protocol comprises same-day hospital admission, exclusive use of local anesthesia, non-invasive assessment of cardiac and neurological status, and selective utilization of cervical drainage. Discharge criteria were goal-directed and included the absence of pain, electrocardiographic abnormalities, hemodynamic instability, neck hematoma, or cranial nerve injury, with a structured plan for rapid readmission if required. Postoperative pain was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS), administered to all patients. The perioperative clinical impact of the protocol was evaluated based on complication rates, pain control, length of hospital stay, and early readmission rates. Results: Among 1051 patients who underwent CEA, 853 met the inclusion criteria. General anesthesia was required in 17 cases (2%), while a cervical drain was placed in 83 patients (10%). The eversion technique was employed in 765 cases (90%). Postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring was necessary for 7 patients (1%). The mean length of hospital stay was 1.17 days. Postoperatively, 17 patients (2%) required surgical revision. Minor stroke occurred in three patients (0.4%), and acute myocardial infarction requiring angioplasty in two patients (0.2%). Inadequate postoperative pain control (NRS > 4) was reported by five patients (0.6%). Hospital readmission was required for one patient due to a neck hematoma. Conclusions: The reported fast-track protocol for elective carotid surgery was associated with a low rate of postoperative complications. These findings support its clinical value and highlight the need for further validation through controlled comparative studies. Furthermore, the implementation of fast-track protocols in carotid surgery should prompt comparative medico-economic research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop