Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (206)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = adjuvant immune-checkpoint inhibitors

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 328 KiB  
Review
Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Stage IIB/IIC Melanoma: Current Evidence and Future Directions
by Ivana Prkačin, Ana Brkić, Nives Pondeljak, Mislav Mokos, Klara Gaćina and Mirna Šitum
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 1894; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081894 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 51
Abstract
Background: Patients with resected stage IIB and IIC melanoma are at high risk of recurrence and distant metastasis, despite surgical treatment. The recent emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to their evaluation in the adjuvant setting for early-stage disease. This [...] Read more.
Background: Patients with resected stage IIB and IIC melanoma are at high risk of recurrence and distant metastasis, despite surgical treatment. The recent emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to their evaluation in the adjuvant setting for early-stage disease. This review aims to synthesize current evidence regarding adjuvant immunotherapy for stage IIB/IIC melanoma, explore emerging strategies, and highlight key challenges and future directions. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature review of randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and relevant mechanistic and biomarker research on adjuvant therapy in stage IIB/IIC melanoma. Particular focus was placed on pivotal trials evaluating PD-1 inhibitors (KEYNOTE-716 and CheckMate 76K), novel vaccine and targeted therapy trials, mechanisms of resistance, immune-related toxicity, and biomarker development. Results: KEYNOTE-716 and CheckMate 76K demonstrated significant improvements in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) with pembrolizumab and nivolumab, respectively, compared to placebo. However, no definitive overall survival benefit has yet been shown. Adjuvant immunotherapy is linked to immune-related adverse events, including permanent endocrinopathies. Emerging personalized approaches, such as circulating tumor DNA monitoring and gene expression profiling, may enhance patient selection, but remain investigational. Conclusions: Adjuvant PD-1 blockade offers clear RFS benefits in high-risk stage II melanoma, but optimal patient selection remains challenging, due to uncertain overall survival benefit and toxicity concerns. Future trials should integrate biomarker-driven approaches to refine therapeutic decisions and minimize overtreatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gene and Cell Therapy)
26 pages, 1037 KiB  
Review
From Spice to Survival: The Emerging Role of Curcumin in Cancer Immunotherapy
by Jacob M. Parker, Lei Zhao, Trenton G. Mayberry, Braydon C. Cowan, Mark R. Wakefield and Yujiang Fang
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2491; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152491 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 425
Abstract
Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatments but still faces challenges, particularly with response rates plateauing around 20–40%. This is primarily due to the immunosuppressive nature of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and the lack of required antigen availability. This emphasizes finding agents that can improve [...] Read more.
Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatments but still faces challenges, particularly with response rates plateauing around 20–40%. This is primarily due to the immunosuppressive nature of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and the lack of required antigen availability. This emphasizes finding agents that can improve these response rates, and curcumin has emerged as a promising natural compound with the potential to reengineer the TME by establishing its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, pro-apoptotic, and anti-angiogenic effects. This review synthesizes the mechanisms by which curcumin affects major oncogenic pathways to synergize with immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell therapies, and cancer vaccinations. Finally, we discuss future directions, current clinical trials, and bioavailability issues with utilizing curcumin clinically. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

36 pages, 5612 KiB  
Review
The Multifaceted Role of p53 in Cancer Molecular Biology: Insights for Precision Diagnosis and Therapeutic Breakthroughs
by Bolong Xu, Ayitila Maimaitijiang, Dawuti Nuerbiyamu, Zhengding Su and Wenfang Li
Biomolecules 2025, 15(8), 1088; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15081088 - 27 Jul 2025
Viewed by 525
Abstract
The protein p53, often referred to as the “guardian of the genome,” is essential for preserving cellular balance and preventing cancerous transformations. As one of the most commonly altered genes in human cancers, its impaired function is associated with tumor initiation, development, and [...] Read more.
The protein p53, often referred to as the “guardian of the genome,” is essential for preserving cellular balance and preventing cancerous transformations. As one of the most commonly altered genes in human cancers, its impaired function is associated with tumor initiation, development, and resistance to treatment. Exploring the diverse roles of p53, which include regulating the cell cycle, repairing DNA, inducing apoptosis, reprogramming metabolism, and modulating immunity, provides valuable insights into cancer mechanisms and potential treatments. This review integrates recent findings on p53′s dual nature, functioning as both a tumor suppressor and an oncogenic promoter, depending on the context. Wild-type p53 suppresses tumors by inducing cell cycle arrest or apoptosis in response to genotoxic stress, while mutated variants often lose these functions or gain novel pro-oncogenic activities. Emerging evidence highlights p53′s involvement in non-canonical pathways, such as regulating tumor microenvironment interactions, metabolic flexibility, and immune evasion mechanisms. For instance, p53 modulates immune checkpoint expression and influences the efficacy of immunotherapies, including PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Furthermore, advancements in precision diagnostics, such as liquid biopsy-based detection of p53 mutations and AI-driven bioinformatics tools, enable early cancer identification and stratification of patients likely to benefit from targeted therapies. Therapeutic strategies targeting p53 pathways are rapidly evolving. Small molecules restoring wild-type p53 activity or disrupting mutant p53 interactions, such as APR-246 and MDM2 inhibitors, show promise in clinical trials. Combination approaches integrating gene editing with synthetic lethal strategies aim to exploit p53-dependent vulnerabilities. Additionally, leveraging p53′s immunomodulatory effects through vaccine development or adjuvants may enhance immunotherapy responses. In conclusion, deciphering p53′s complex biology underscores its unparalleled potential as a biomarker and therapeutic target. Integrating multi-omics analyses, functional genomic screens, and real-world clinical data will accelerate the translation of p53-focused research into precision oncology breakthroughs, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue DNA Damage and Repair in Cancer Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 440 KiB  
Review
Diagnosis and Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Review
by Domenique Escobar, Christopher Wang, Noah Suboc, Anishka D’Souza and Varsha Tulpule
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2467; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152467 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 474
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and biologically distinct subset of urothelial malignancies, comprising approximately 5–10% of urothelial cancers. UTUC presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with both a higher likelihood of invasive disease at presentation and a less favorable [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and biologically distinct subset of urothelial malignancies, comprising approximately 5–10% of urothelial cancers. UTUC presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with both a higher likelihood of invasive disease at presentation and a less favorable prognosis compared to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Current treatment strategies for UTUC are largely derived from bladder cancer studies, underscoring the need for UTUC-directed research. This review provides a comprehensive overview of UTUC, encompassing diagnostic approaches, systemic and intraluminal therapies, surgical management, and future directions. Methods: A narrative review was conducted synthesizing evidence from guideline-based recommendations, retrospective and prospective clinical studies, and ongoing trials focused on UTUC. Results: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is increasingly preferred in UTUC due to the risk of postoperative renal impairment that may preclude adjuvant cisplatin use. Surgical management includes kidney-sparing approaches and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), with selection guided by tumor risk and patient comorbidities. While endoscopic management (EM) preserves renal function, it carries a higher recurrence and surveillance burden; RNU remains standard for high-risk cases. Systemic therapy for advanced and metastatic UTUC mirrors that of bladder urothelial carcinoma. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab showed superior efficacy over chemotherapy in the EV-302 trial, with improved response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival across subgroups, including UTUC. For patients ineligible for EV, the CheckMate-901 study supported first-line chemoimmunotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nivolumab. Further systemic therapy strategies include maintenance avelumab post-chemotherapy (JAVELIN Bladder 100), targeted therapies such as erdafitinib (THOR trial), and trastuzumab deruxtecan (DESTINY-PanTumor02) in FGFR2/3-altered and HER2-positive disease, respectively. Conclusions: Historically, the therapeutic landscape of UTUC has been extrapolated from bladder cancer; however, ongoing research specific to UTUC is deriving more precise regimens involving the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody–drug conjugates, and biomarker-driven therapies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Knowledge and Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 205 KiB  
Review
The Utility of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in the Management of Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
by Louis Filipiak, Koosha Paydary, Mary Jo Fidler and Helen J. Ross
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2462; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152462 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 242
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved in at least one line of therapy for most patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without EGFR/ALK alterations and have improved survival for a subset of patients. Adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and perioperative therapy for resectable NSCLC [...] Read more.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved in at least one line of therapy for most patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without EGFR/ALK alterations and have improved survival for a subset of patients. Adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and perioperative therapy for resectable NSCLC carries the hope of more broadly increased cure rates for patients with resectable lung cancers. This review summarizes the current state of multimodality management, including ICIs, for resectable NSCLC. A literature search of PubMed and Scopus identified phase II and III clinical trials including ICIs in patients with resectable NSCLC. No level 1 evidence guides the clinician in choosing between the available neoadjuvant and perioperative approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy)
13 pages, 1778 KiB  
Article
Rhinosinusitis as an Immune-Related Adverse Event: Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Prognostic Implications in Metastatic Melanoma Patients
by Amalia Anastasopoulou, Aikaterini Gkoufa, Panagiotis Kouzis, Georgios Kyriakakis, Michail Belivanis, Georgia Sypsa, Spyridon Bouros, Helen Gogas and Panagiotis T. Diamantopoulos
Cancers 2025, 17(14), 2297; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17142297 - 10 Jul 2025
Viewed by 205
Abstract
Background: Melanoma management has been revolutionized by the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, ICIs are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including rhinosinusitis, which remains underexplored. This study evaluated the incidence, characteristics, management, and prognostic implications of rhinosinusitis in patients [...] Read more.
Background: Melanoma management has been revolutionized by the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, ICIs are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including rhinosinusitis, which remains underexplored. This study evaluated the incidence, characteristics, management, and prognostic implications of rhinosinusitis in patients with melanoma under ICIs. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on adult patients with melanoma treated with ICIs. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, treatment, and survival data were collected. Rhinosinusitis was defined radiographically and graded using the Harvard scoring system. Associations between rhinosinusitis and survival outcomes were analyzed. Results: Among 304 patients, 64 (21.1%) developed imaging-confirmed rhinosinusitis during ICI treatment, with 9.4% symptomatic cases. Rhinosinusitis was the sole irAE in 11.8% of patients, and 9.2% experienced it alongside other irAEs. A significant correlation with eosinophilia was observed: 39.6% of eosinophilic patients developed rhinosinusitis versus 17.1% without eosinophilia (p < 0.001). Most cases occurred during the first ICI line (86.4%), particularly with nivolumab monotherapy (32.8%). Importantly, in metastatic melanoma, rhinosinusitis was associated with significantly longer overall survival since ICI initiation (OSICI) compared to patients without rhinosinusitis (33.3 vs. 15.4 months, p = 0.025). No survival benefit was observed in the adjuvant setting. The condition was predominantly aseptic, and corticosteroids were used in 7.8%. Conclusions: This study highlights rhinosinusitis as an irAE associated with improved OS in metastatic melanoma. Further research is required to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and assess the resolution of rhinosinusitis after ICI discontinuation. Additionally, rhinosinusitis may serve as a marker of favorable prognosis in metastatic melanoma patients receiving ICIs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Metastasis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 269 KiB  
Review
Perioperative Chemo/Immunotherapies in Lung Cancer: A Critical Review on the Value of Perioperative Sequences
by Thoma’ Dario Clementi, Francesca Colonese, Stefania Canova, Maria Ida Abbate, Luca Sala, Francesco Petrella, Gabriele Giuseppe Pagliari and Diego Luigi Cortinovis
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(7), 397; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32070397 - 10 Jul 2025
Viewed by 514
Abstract
Resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to pose significant challenges with high recurrence and mortality rates, despite traditional platinum-based chemotherapy yielding only an approximate 5% improvement in 5-year overall survival when administered preoperatively or postoperatively. In recent years, the integration of immune [...] Read more.
Resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to pose significant challenges with high recurrence and mortality rates, despite traditional platinum-based chemotherapy yielding only an approximate 5% improvement in 5-year overall survival when administered preoperatively or postoperatively. In recent years, the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as nivolumab, durvalumab and pembrolizumab, with platinum-based regimens in the perioperative setting has emerged as a transformative strategy. Our comprehensive review, based on a systematic bibliographic search of PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, targeting pivotal clinical trials from the past two decades, examines the impact of these neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy approaches on major pathological response rates and overall survival in early-stage NSCLC. Although these perioperative strategies represent a paradigm shift in treatment, promising durable responses are offset by persistent recurrence, emphasizing the necessity for optimized treatment sequencing, duration, and the identification of predictive biomarkers. Collectively, our findings underscore the critical role of the perioperative schema, particularly the neoadjuvant component, which enables the evaluation of novel biomarkers as surrogates for overall survival, in improving patient outcomes and delineating future research directions aimed at reducing mortality and enhancing the quality of life for patients with resectable NSCLC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Current Status of Lung Cancer Surgery)
12 pages, 1739 KiB  
Article
Local T-Cell Dysregulation and Immune Checkpoint Expression in Human Papillomavirus-Mediated Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis
by Hans N. C. Eckel, Su Ir Lyu, Frederik Faste, Shachi J. Sharma, Anne Nobis, Nora Wuerdemann, Maria Ziogas, Marcel Mayer, Malte C. Suchan, Kerstin Wennhold, Maria A. Garcia-Marquez, Martin Thelen, Elena Hagen, Julia Eßer, Charlotte Klasen, Oliver Siefer, Martin Otte, Hans A. Schloesser, Jens P. Klussmann, Alexander Quaas and Kevin K. Hansenadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cells 2025, 14(13), 985; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14130985 - 27 Jun 2025
Viewed by 519
Abstract
Human papillomavirus-mediated recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is a premalignant neoplasia of the upper airway characterized by significant dysphonia and respiratory obstruction. Immune checkpoint blockade has emerged as a potential alternative to repeated surgical interventions in RRP. Here, we investigated the intralesional T-cell composition [...] Read more.
Human papillomavirus-mediated recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is a premalignant neoplasia of the upper airway characterized by significant dysphonia and respiratory obstruction. Immune checkpoint blockade has emerged as a potential alternative to repeated surgical interventions in RRP. Here, we investigated the intralesional T-cell composition and expression of the immune checkpoints programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) in RRP. We analyzed tissue samples from 30 patients treated at a tertiary care center between 2009 and 2021, including paired samples from individual patients collected at different time points. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for CD4, CD8, CTLA-4, FoxP3, and PD-L1 and correlated with disease severity and previous adjuvant therapies. Overall disease burden and intervention-free survival were not associated with the abundance of CD4+, CD8+, or FoxP3+ T cells, nor with immune checkpoint expression. However, patients with aggressive disease exhibited a higher intralesional FoxP3/CD4 T-cell ratio. Prior intralesional cidofovir treatment was associated with reduced CD4+ T-cell infiltration. These findings suggest that a locally immunosuppressive microenvironment, reflected by an elevated FoxP3/CD4 ratio, contributes to disease severity in RRP. Consistent CTLA-4 expression across all evaluated samples supports further investigation of anti-CTLA-4 therapy, either alone or in combination with other checkpoint inhibitors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cellular Immunology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 571 KiB  
Review
The Role of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in the Management of High-Risk Stage III Resectable Melanoma: A Literature Review
by Jobran Mansour and Cecelia E. Schmalbach
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2152; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132152 - 26 Jun 2025
Viewed by 526
Abstract
Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is changing the treatment paradigm for patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma. This systemic approach leverages the presence of tumor antigens to generate a robust and durable antitumor immune response compared to traditional adjuvant therapy. The comprehensive review highlights contemporary clinical trials [...] Read more.
Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is changing the treatment paradigm for patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma. This systemic approach leverages the presence of tumor antigens to generate a robust and durable antitumor immune response compared to traditional adjuvant therapy. The comprehensive review highlights contemporary clinical trials shaping the landscape of melanoma treatment algorithms. Single-modality agents and combination regimens are outlined along with response-adapted strategies, which aim to balance efficacy and toxicity. These novel neoadjuvant immunotherapy strategies promise to further refine treatment in a personalized manner, ideally offering patients the opportunity for greater response, reduced treatment toxicity, and improved long-term survival. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Skin Cancers of the Head and Neck)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 566 KiB  
Review
Adjuvant Immunotherapy for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Advances and Future Perspectives
by Alice Ravasin, Lavinia Gatteschi, Valentina Massa, Mauro Iannopollo, Luca Voltolini and Alessandro Gonfiotti
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2099; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132099 - 23 Jun 2025
Viewed by 738
Abstract
Adjuvant treatment for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has seen significant advancements following the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). These therapies, which enhance the immune system’s ability to recognize and target cancer cells, have demonstrated substantial improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) [...] Read more.
Adjuvant treatment for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has seen significant advancements following the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). These therapies, which enhance the immune system’s ability to recognize and target cancer cells, have demonstrated substantial improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) following surgical resection. Recent studies have shown that ICIs can extend DFS, particularly for patients with high Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression but also for those with lower levels of PD-L1, suggesting a broader potential for their application. In the IMpower010 trial, atezolizumab improved DFS compared to best supportive care (BSC) in resected stage II–IIIA NSCLC, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.66 (95% CI 0.50–0.88) for patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1% and 0.79 (95% CI 0.64–0.96) for the overall stage II–IIIA population. In the PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091 trial, pembrolizumab also demonstrated a DFS benefit over a placebo for patients with stage IB–IIIA disease (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.63–0.91), with a median DFS of 53.6 months versus 42.0 months. Despite these promising results, challenges remain regarding the optimal selection of patients, particularly in identifying the most effective biomarkers and determining the ideal duration of treatment. While ICIs are generally well-tolerated, immune-related adverse events, although manageable, require careful monitoring, especially when ICIs are used in combination with chemotherapy. Ongoing research is focused on optimizing treatment duration and exploring combination therapies, with the objective of further improving long-term survival outcomes. The integration of immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting represents a significant advancement in the management of resectable NSCLC. This review aims to provide an overview of the current evidence supporting the use of ICIs in the adjuvant treatment of NSCLC, focusing on treatment efficacy, safety profiles, and ongoing research into biomarkers and combination therapies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

53 pages, 1094 KiB  
Review
Research and Clinical Progress of Therapeutic Tumor Vaccines
by Chunyan Dong, Zhuang Li, Dejiang Tan, Huimin Sun, Jinghui Liang, Dexian Wei, Yiyang Zheng, Linyu Zhang, Sihan Liu, Yu Zhang, Junzhi Wang and Qing He
Vaccines 2025, 13(7), 672; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13070672 - 23 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1594
Abstract
Therapeutic cancer vaccines are a new growth point of biomedicine with broad industrial prospects in the post-COVID-19 era. Many large international pharmaceutical companies and emerging biotechnology companies are deploying different tumor therapeutic cancer vaccine projects, focusing on promoting their clinical transformation, and the [...] Read more.
Therapeutic cancer vaccines are a new growth point of biomedicine with broad industrial prospects in the post-COVID-19 era. Many large international pharmaceutical companies and emerging biotechnology companies are deploying different tumor therapeutic cancer vaccine projects, focusing on promoting their clinical transformation, and the vaccine industry has strong momentum for development. Such vaccines are also the core engine and pilot site for the development of new vaccine targets, new vectors, new adjuvants, and new technologies, which play a key role in promoting the innovation and development of vaccines. Various therapeutic cancer vaccines, such as viral vector vaccines, bacterial vector vaccines, cell vector vaccines, peptide vaccines, and nucleic acid vaccines, have all been applied in clinical research. With the continuous development of technology, therapeutic cancer vaccines are evolving towards the trends of precise antigens, efficient carriers, diversified adjuvants, and combined applications. For instance, the rapidly advancing mRNA-4157 vaccine is a typical representative that combines personalized antigens with efficient delivery vectors (lipid nanoparticles, LNPs), and it also shows synergistic advantages in melanoma patients treated in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this article, we will systematically discuss the current research and development status and clinical research progress of various therapeutic cancer vaccines. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 649 KiB  
Review
Melanoma Vaccines: Comparing Novel Adjuvant Treatments in High-Risk Patients
by Joseph C. Broderick, Alexandra M. Adams, Elizabeth L. Barbera, Spencer Van Decar, Guy T. Clifton and George E. Peoples
Vaccines 2025, 13(6), 656; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13060656 - 19 Jun 2025
Viewed by 694
Abstract
Background: The emergence of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) has significantly improved survival outcomes in later-stage melanoma. However, the efficacy of these treatments remains limited, with around 50% of later-stage melanoma patients experiencing recurrence. As variable response rates to CPIs persist, the development of cancer [...] Read more.
Background: The emergence of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) has significantly improved survival outcomes in later-stage melanoma. However, the efficacy of these treatments remains limited, with around 50% of later-stage melanoma patients experiencing recurrence. As variable response rates to CPIs persist, the development of cancer vaccines has emerged as a potential strategy to augment antitumor immune responses. Results: This review compares two promising personalized therapeutic cancer vaccine trials in advanced melanoma: Elios Therapeutics’ Tumor Lysate (TL) vaccine and Moderna’s mRNA-4157 vaccine. The TL vaccine, which utilizes yeast cell wall particles (YCWPs) loaded with autologous tumor lysate, and the mRNA-4157 vaccine, which encodes up to 34 patient-specific neoantigens, both aim to stimulate robust tumor-specific immune responses. Both trials were phase 2b randomized studies, with Elios Therapeutics’ trial employing a double-blind, placebo-controlled design, while Moderna’s was open-label. Both trials had roughly equivalent sample sizes (n = 187 and n = 157, respectively) with similar demographics and disease characteristics. The TL trial reported improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.52 (p < 0.01) over 36 months, whereas the mRNA-4157 trial demonstrated improvements in recurrence-free survival (RFS) with an HR of 0.56 (p = 0.053) over 18 months. The TL vaccine exhibited lower rates of related grade 3 adverse events (<1%) compared to the mRNA vaccine (12%). Key differences between the two trials include the use of CPIs, with 100% of patients in the mRNA trial receiving pembrolizumab versus 37% of the patients in the TL trial receiving either an anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4. The production processes also varied significantly, with the mRNA vaccine requiring individualized sequencing and a 9-week production time, while the TL vaccine utilized tumor lysate with a 1–3-day production time. Conclusions: While both vaccines demonstrated promising efficacy, future phase 3 trials are needed to further evaluate their potential as adjuvant therapies for melanoma. This review highlights the comparative strengths and limitations of these vaccine platforms, providing insight into the evolving landscape of adjuvant cancer vaccines. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 316 KiB  
Perspective
Optimising Cancer Medicine in Clinical Practices: Are Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Immunotherapies Affordable for Cancer Patients in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?
by Rashidul Alam Mahumud
Cancers 2025, 17(10), 1722; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17101722 - 21 May 2025
Viewed by 652
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy, encompassing neoadjuvant and adjuvant interventions, has transformed treatment paradigms in multiple malignancies by leveraging the host immune system to combat tumour cells. While immunotherapies have demonstrated remarkable efficacy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, high treatment costs undermine their accessibility and affordability in [...] Read more.
Cancer immunotherapy, encompassing neoadjuvant and adjuvant interventions, has transformed treatment paradigms in multiple malignancies by leveraging the host immune system to combat tumour cells. While immunotherapies have demonstrated remarkable efficacy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, high treatment costs undermine their accessibility and affordability in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper provides a prospective overview of the clinical benefits of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapies, examines the barriers to implementing these treatments in LMICs, and suggests potential strategies to improve equitable access. Such interventions necessitate a combined effort from healthcare providers, policymakers, and stakeholders to ensure their sustainable integration into global cancer care. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 1400 KiB  
Review
Perspectives of Targeting Autophagy as an Adjuvant to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy for Colorectal Cancer Treatment
by Nasrah ALKhemeiri, Sahar Eljack and Maha Mohamed Saber-Ayad
Cells 2025, 14(10), 745; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14100745 - 20 May 2025
Viewed by 1162
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the world, with increasing incidence and mortality rates. Standard conventional treatments for CRC are surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Recently, immunotherapy has been introduced as a promising alternative to CRC treatment that utilizes patients’ [...] Read more.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the world, with increasing incidence and mortality rates. Standard conventional treatments for CRC are surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Recently, immunotherapy has been introduced as a promising alternative to CRC treatment that utilizes patients’ immune system to combat cancer cells. The beneficial effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors, specifically anti-PD-1/ PD-L1, has been ascribed to the abundance of DNA replication errors that result in the formation of neoantigens. Such neoantigens serve as distinct flags that amplify the immune response when checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are administered. DNA replication errors in CRC patients are expressed as two statuses: the first is the deficient mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR) with a higher overall immune response and survival rate than the second status of patients with proficient mismatch repair (MSS/pMMR). There is a limitation to using anti-PD-1/PD-L1 as it is only confined to MSI-H/dMMR, where there is an abundance of T-cell inhibitory ligands (PD-L1). This calls for investigating new therapeutic interventions to widen the scope of ICIs’ role in the treatment of CRC. Autophagy modulation provides a good example. Autophagy is a cellular process that plays a crucial role in maintaining cellular homeostasis and has been studied for its impact on tumor development, progression, and response to treatment. In this review, we aim to highlight autophagy as a potential determinant in tumor immune response and to study the impact of autophagy on the tumor immune microenvironment. Moreover, we aim to investigate the value of a combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents with autophagy modulators as an adjuvant therapeutic approach for CRC treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Autophagy and Tumor Microenvironment)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 1233 KiB  
Review
Vitamin D and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Cancer: A Synergistic Approach to Enhancing Treatment Efficacy
by Yu Zhang, Yan Xu, Wei Zhong, Jing Zhao, Xiaoyan Liu, Xiaoxing Gao, Minjiang Chen and Mengzhao Wang
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(10), 4511; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104511 - 9 May 2025
Viewed by 944
Abstract
Lung cancer, a malignant neoplasm that is globally prevalent and characterized by high incidence and mortality rates, has seen the rise of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as a crucial systemic treatment. However, a subset of patients exhibits suboptimal responses to ICIs. Recently, studies [...] Read more.
Lung cancer, a malignant neoplasm that is globally prevalent and characterized by high incidence and mortality rates, has seen the rise of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as a crucial systemic treatment. However, a subset of patients exhibits suboptimal responses to ICIs. Recently, studies revealed the role of vitamin D in inflammation modulation, cell differentiation, and cancer prevention. Vitamin D precisely modulates immune responses and inflammatory states within the tumor microenvironment (TME) by targeting both innate and adaptive immunity. These effects may reduce immune tolerance to ICIs and synergistically enhance their therapeutic efficacy. Here, we review vitamin D metabolism in lung cancer patients, as well as its anti-tumor mechanisms, immune regulation, and the significant promise of vitamin D in lung cancer immunotherapy and adjuvant therapeutic strategies. Further research is imperative to surmount these challenges and fully realize vitamin D’s potential in improving lung cancer immunotherapy outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Vitamin D in Human Health and Diseases 4.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop