Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (49)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = acute rhinosinusitis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 1070 KiB  
Review
Nasal Irrigations: A 360-Degree View in Clinical Practice
by Luca Pecoraro, Elisabetta Di Muri, Gianluca Lezzi, Silvia Picciolo, Marta De Musso, Michele Piazza, Mariangela Bosoni and Flavia Indrio
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1402; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081402 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 439
Abstract
Nasal irrigation (NI) is an effective, safe, low-cost strategy for treating and preventing upper respiratory tract diseases. High-volume, low-pressure saline irrigations are the most efficient method for removing infectious agents, allergens, and inflammatory mediators. This article reviews clinical evidence supporting NI use in [...] Read more.
Nasal irrigation (NI) is an effective, safe, low-cost strategy for treating and preventing upper respiratory tract diseases. High-volume, low-pressure saline irrigations are the most efficient method for removing infectious agents, allergens, and inflammatory mediators. This article reviews clinical evidence supporting NI use in various conditions: nasal congestion in infants, recurrent respiratory infections, acute and chronic rhinosinusitis, allergic and gestational rhinitis, empty nose syndrome, and post-endoscopic sinus surgery care. NI improves symptoms, reduces recurrence, enhances the efficacy of topical drugs, and decreases the need for antibiotics and decongestants. During the COVID-19 pandemic, NI has also been explored as a complementary measure to reduce viral load. Due to the safe profile and mechanical cleansing action on inflammatory mucus, nasal irrigations represent a valuable adjunctive treatment across a wide range of sinonasal conditions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 829 KiB  
Article
Medication Recommendation, Counseling, and Pricing for Nasal Sprays in German Community Pharmacies: A Simulated Patient Investigation
by Bernhard Langer, Christian Kunow, Tim Dethloff and Sarah George
Adv. Respir. Med. 2025, 93(3), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/arm93030018 - 13 Jun 2025
Viewed by 736
Abstract
For the self-medication of nasal congestion following a common cold, decongestant nasal sprays can be recommended according to the medicine guidelines. In Germany, these are only available in community pharmacies (CPs) with free pricing. The aim was to analyze the medication recommendation, counseling, [...] Read more.
For the self-medication of nasal congestion following a common cold, decongestant nasal sprays can be recommended according to the medicine guidelines. In Germany, these are only available in community pharmacies (CPs) with free pricing. The aim was to analyze the medication recommendation, counseling, and pricing. A covert simulated patient study, internationally recognized as the “gold standard”, was conducted in all CPs of two medium-sized cities in north-eastern Germany. Each CP was visited twice (86 visits) with the identical scenario by one female and one male simulated patient. At the beginning, they asked for a nasal spray and, when asked, stated that they had had nasal congestion for three days. Slightly more than half (54.7%, 47/86) of the recommended nasal sprays were free of preservatives. The median counseling score was 2.0 out of 8 points, with a significantly higher score observed for the female SP (p = 0.004). Information on the maximum intake duration of five days recommended in the German pharmacy guideline was not provided during any visits. The prices varied in total from EUR 1.95 to EUR 6.22. Therefore, measures by the legislator and the chambers of pharmacists are necessary to sustainably improve the medication recommendation, the counseling, and the price transparency. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 668 KiB  
Article
Clinical Evaluation of NESOSPRAY HE-C, a Nasal Spray, for Rhinopharyngitis and Rhinosinusitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
by Fatima-Zahra El Barche, Manon D’almeida, Séverine Dameron and Rémi Shrivastava
Medicina 2025, 61(6), 1071; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61061071 - 11 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 867
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The common cold (acute rhinopharyngitis) and acute rhinosinusitis are highly prevalent conditions that significantly impact quality of life, often leading to nasal congestion, inflammation, and discomfort. Given the growing demand for non-pharmacological treatment options, particularly for vulnerable populations such [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The common cold (acute rhinopharyngitis) and acute rhinosinusitis are highly prevalent conditions that significantly impact quality of life, often leading to nasal congestion, inflammation, and discomfort. Given the growing demand for non-pharmacological treatment options, particularly for vulnerable populations such as children and pregnant women, alternative therapies are increasingly being explored. NESOSPRAY HE-C, a nasal spray formulated with a glycerol-based filmogenic solution, acts by forming a protective osmotic film on the nasal mucosa. This mechanism facilitates mechanical cleansing, enhances decongestion, and reduces inflammation while preserving mucosal integrity. Its purely topical and mechanical mode of action provides a non-systemic alternative for symptom management. Materials and Methods: This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of NESOSPRAY HE-C (n = 29) compared to a placebo nasal spray (n = 26) in patients aged ≥ 3 years diagnosed with the common cold or acute rhinosinusitis. Participants had a baseline Rhinosinusitis Symptom Severity Score (RSSS) of ≥25/50. Treatment consisted of administering 2–3 sprays per nostril, four times daily, every 4 to 6 h, for up to 8 days or until symptom resolution. The primary outcomes included changes in total RSSS, Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey (WURSS) score, and individual symptom scores (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, cough, poor sleep, facial pain, and fever). Safety assessments included adverse event monitoring and treatment tolerability, with subgroup analyses performed for children and pregnant women. Results: Baseline demographics were comparable between the treatment groups. NESOSPRAY HE-C demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in total RSSS from Day 3 onward (p = 0.0008), with sustained superiority through Day 8 (p < 0.0001). Significant improvements in rhinorrhea and nasal congestion were observed within 2 h of administration (p = 0.0089), while reductions in cough (p = 0.0052), poor sleep (p = 0.0005), and facial pain (p = 0.0111) emerged by Day 3. Fever reduction was most pronounced on Days 6 (p = 0.0001) and 8 (p = 0.0312), indicating a delayed but significant effect. In terms of the WURSS score, NESOSPRAY HE-C showed a significant improvement from Day 1, with a greater reduction in symptom severity compared to placebo. This trend of greater improvement continued through Day 8. The treatment was well tolerated, with no reports of serious adverse events or allergic reactions. Efficacy was consistent across all subgroups, including children, pregnant women, and adults. Conclusions: NESOSPRAY HE-C provides rapid and sustained symptom relief for the common cold and acute rhinosinusitis, serving as a safe and effective non-pharmacological alternative to conventional treatments. By leveraging its osmotic action and barrier-forming properties, it facilitates mechanical cleansing, enhances decongestion, and reduces inflammation while preserving mucosal integrity. Additionally, by forming a protective film on the nasal mucosa, it protects against future irritations, further supporting its role as a valuable therapeutic option, particularly for individuals seeking non-systemic symptom management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2371 KiB  
Systematic Review
Pott’s Puffy Tumor in the Adult Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case Reports
by Klaudia Kokot, Justyna Małgorzata Fercho, Konrad Duszyński, Weronika Jagieło, Jakub Miller, Oskar Gerald Chasles, Rami Yuser, Martyna Klecha, Rafał Matuszczak, Eryk Nowiński, Kaja Klein-Awerjanow, Tomasz Nowicki, Maciej Mielczarek, Jacek Szypenbejl, Mariusz Siemiński and Tomasz Szmuda
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4062; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124062 - 8 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1094
Abstract
Objectives: Pott’s puffy tumor (PPT) is a rare and life-threatening infection of the frontal sinuses, predominantly affecting children but with less frequent reports in adults. Therefore, we present an analysis of one hundred and eighty-one cases of adult patients diagnosed with PPT, [...] Read more.
Objectives: Pott’s puffy tumor (PPT) is a rare and life-threatening infection of the frontal sinuses, predominantly affecting children but with less frequent reports in adults. Therefore, we present an analysis of one hundred and eighty-one cases of adult patients diagnosed with PPT, along with a description of one of our cases. The purpose of this research is to identify the most common symptoms, predisposing medical history, predominant microorganisms, commonly used antibiotics, treatment options, long-term outcomes, and possible complications in adults. Despite its rarity, PPT has a dynamic course, necessitating familiarization with appropriate treatment methods to improve patient well-being. Methods: Methods involved a systematic search of PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Scopus, following PRISMA guidelines. A total of 122 articles were screened, providing 180 adult patients aged 18 to 86, alongside 1 additional patient treated at our institution, bringing the total to 181 patients. Results: The results showed that the patients ranged from 18 to 86 years of age (mean age of 47 years), with 72.2% being males. The most common symptoms were forehead swelling (74.7%), frontal headache (67%), fever (59.3%), and acute/chronic rhinosinusitis (39.6%). The risk factors associated with its development include sinusitis (49.5%) and previous head trauma (12.6%). Intracranial involvement was found in 38.1% of patients. Streptococcus spp. (19.3%) and Staphylococcus spp. (16.6%) were the most commonly identified pathogens. Surgical intervention was employed in 87.3% of cases, with a mean hospital stay of 23 days. There was no significant difference in hospital stay or rehospitalization rates between those with and without intracranial involvement. Antibiotic therapy was used in 87.3% of cases, with a mean duration of 61 days. A combination of Cephalosporin, Metronidazole, and Nafcillin was the most common empirical antibiotic therapy. The mean follow-up period was 14 months, with a mortality rate of 1.6%. Conclusions: The conclusion highlights the importance of the prompt initiation of empirical antibiotic therapy, followed by targeted treatment based on microbiological cultures. Recognizing that PPT symptoms are not exclusive to pediatric patients but can also affect adults is crucial. PPT warrants further research to optimize its management and outcomes. It is believed that PPT may be more treatable in adults when identified early, which emphasizes the need for PPT recognition among adults. Timely empirical antibiotics based on microbiological results, along with appropriate surgical intervention, are critical for improving outcomes. Multidisciplinary care involving otolaryngologists, neurologists, and infectious disease specialists is essential. Further studies should be developed for the evaluation of diagnostic protocols and long-term management strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Otolaryngology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1290 KiB  
Case Report
Unilateral Palpebral Edema as a Central Sign of Acute Enterobacter-Associated Rhinosinusitis in a 5-Year-Old: A Rare Pediatric Case
by Andrei Osman, Irina Enache, Alice Elena Ghenea, Alexandra Bucătaru, Sidonia Cătălina Vrabie and Ovidiu Mircea Zlatian
Reports 2025, 8(2), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8020066 - 14 May 2025
Viewed by 463
Abstract
Background and Clinical Significance: Acute pediatric rhinosinusitis is most commonly caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. The involvement of Enterobacter species is rare and typically linked to chronic or nosocomial infections. Typical cases of acute rhinosinusitis [...] Read more.
Background and Clinical Significance: Acute pediatric rhinosinusitis is most commonly caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. The involvement of Enterobacter species is rare and typically linked to chronic or nosocomial infections. Typical cases of acute rhinosinusitis in children present with abundant nasal discharge, headache, and fever and are generally managed with systemic antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), mucolytics, and topical intranasal treatment. Atypical presentations prompt heightened clinical attention, and depending on the symptoms and patient status, surgical interventions might be considered. Case Presentation: We report the case of a previously healthy 5-year-old boy presenting with painful unilateral palpebral edema, minimal ipsilateral nasal discharge, and persistent headache despite standard rhinosinusitis therapy. Imaging tests revealed complete right maxillary sinus opacification. As the clinical response to ceftriaxone and dexamethasone was minimal, we opted for endoscopic sinus surgery. A nasal swab culture identified Enterobacter spp. in the nasal discharge. Conclusions: Unusual pathogens like Enterobacter spp. can cause acute sinusitis in children without prior risk factors. Early surgical intervention and culture-adjusted antimicrobial therapy remain critical for favorable outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complex Cases in Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 973 KiB  
Article
Impact of Chronic Rhinosinusitis on Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis Exacerbations
by Trisha Shang, David C. Kaelber and Mohamad R. Chaaban
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(9), 2962; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14092962 - 25 Apr 2025
Viewed by 461
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is an autoimmune vasculitis, often presenting first with sinonasal symptoms diagnosed as vasculitis chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Patients with limited (L) GPA do not have renal involvement and often have more local sinonasal disease. Few studies have examined systemic [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is an autoimmune vasculitis, often presenting first with sinonasal symptoms diagnosed as vasculitis chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Patients with limited (L) GPA do not have renal involvement and often have more local sinonasal disease. Few studies have examined systemic progression in LGPA patients presenting with local sinonasal disease. Our objective was to compare GPA disease progression and activity in LGPA patients with and without CRS. Methods: Using the US Collaborative Network of the TriNetX platform, we conducted a retrospective study of adults with LGPA and CRS versus those without CRS. Outcomes were measured 1 month-5 years after patients met inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were acute sinusitis, end-organ damage, and major GPA disease activity. Secondary outcomes were end-organ damage and major disease activity for each organ system and mortality. Results: There were n = 1097 in the LGPA with CRS cohort and n = 3331 in the LGPA without CRS cohort, with n = 1023 in each cohort after 1:1 propensity matching on age, gender, ethnicity, and race. We found a significantly greater risk of acute sinusitis (risk ratio: 4.80, 95% confidence interval: [2.89,7.99]), end-organ damage (2.99 [2.41, 3.70]), and major disease activity (2.41 [1.73, 3.35]) comparing patients with CRS to those without. LGPA patients with CRS had no significant difference in mortality compared to those without CRS (0.94, [0.64,1.38]). Conclusions: Patients with LGPA and CRS have greater risk of developing disease progression and increased organ system disease activity compared to LGPA without CRS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Otolaryngology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 6684 KiB  
Review
The Importance of MRI in the Early Diagnosis of Acute Invasive Fungal Rhinosinusitis
by François Voruz, Dionysios Neofytos, Christian Van Delden, Johannes Lobrinus, Claudio De Vito, Sonia Macario, Dimitrios Daskalou, Julien W. Hsieh, Minerva Becker and Basile N. Landis
Diagnostics 2025, 15(3), 311; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15030311 - 28 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1509
Abstract
Acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFR) is a rare, severe, and life-threatening opportunistic infection associated with high mortality and morbidity. Rapid and accurate diagnosis and treatment are crucial for survival and effective disease management. Diagnosing AIFR is challenging because no single pathognomonic feature exists [...] Read more.
Acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFR) is a rare, severe, and life-threatening opportunistic infection associated with high mortality and morbidity. Rapid and accurate diagnosis and treatment are crucial for survival and effective disease management. Diagnosing AIFR is challenging because no single pathognomonic feature exists other than surgical biopsy showing fungal angioinvasion and necrosis. This narrative review focuses on the diagnostic challenges and pitfalls, emphasizing the critical clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for early diagnosis of AIFR. It includes selected cases that illustrate the significance of MRI. When AIFR is suspected, clinical symptoms, nasal endoscopy, blood samples, and facial computed tomography all provide non-specific information. In contrast, MRI can identify signs of devitalized sinonasal mucosa consistent with AIFR. The absence of mucosal enhancement on T1-weighted images, combined with restricted diffusivity, are characteristic MRI features of AIFR. The cases presented underscore the usefulness of MRI in supporting clinical suspicion of AIFR and accurately determining its topography, thereby guiding early surgical biopsies and debridement. In suspected cases of AIFR, MRI serves as a valuable supplementary, non-invasive tool to help determine whether prompt surgical biopsy or debridement is necessary, thereby enhancing early diagnosis and improving survival rates. Therefore, the threshold for conducting an MRI in these cases should be low. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 533 KiB  
Brief Report
Impact of Education on Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescription for Respiratory Tract Infection Based on Physicians’ Justifications: A Web-Based Survey in Japan
by Ryohei Kudoh, Kosaku Komiya, Norihito Kaku, Yuichiro Shindo, Tatsuya Hayashi, Kei Kasahara, Tomohiro Oishi, Naruhiko Ishiwada, Makoto Ito, Hiroshi Yotsuyanagi, Naoki Hasegawa, Kazuhiro Tateda, Muneki Hotomi and Katsunori Yanagihara
Antibiotics 2024, 13(11), 1022; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13111022 - 30 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1358
Abstract
Background: Antibiotics are inappropriately prescribed for respiratory tract infections for various reasons. The differences of the effects of education based on these reasons has not been fully elucidated. This study assessed the impact of an educational film on antibiotic prescription patterns according [...] Read more.
Background: Antibiotics are inappropriately prescribed for respiratory tract infections for various reasons. The differences of the effects of education based on these reasons has not been fully elucidated. This study assessed the impact of an educational film on antibiotic prescription patterns according to physicians’ prescribing justifications. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a nationwide web-based survey involving 1100 physicians. The physicians were required to view a short educational film and determine the need for prescribing antibiotics in simulated scenarios of different acute respiratory tract infectious diseases. The associations between the reasons for antibiotic prescription to patients not requiring antibiotics before viewing the educational film and the positive effects of the intervention were analyzed. Results: The educational intervention positively affected prescribing trends among physicians who prescribed antibiotics for “fever” in mild acute rhinosinusitis (prescription rates from 100% to 25.9%), “pus in the laryngopharynx” in mild acute pharyngitis (prescription rates from 100% to 29.6%), and “purulent sputum” in acute bronchitis without chronic lung disease (prescription rates from 100% to 29.9%) before viewing the film. In contrast, no benefits were observed when the justification was “patient’s desire for antibiotics” in mild acute pharyngitis (prescription rates from 100% to 48.5%) and acute bronchitis without chronic lung disease (prescription rates from 100% to 44.0%) or “parents’ desire for antibiotics” in narrowly defined common cold in children (prescription rates from 100% to 45.7%). Conclusions: although educational interventions might reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescription by providing accurate knowledge about respiratory tract infections, they appear ineffective for physicians who prescribe antibiotics based on patients’ or parents’ desires for antibiotic treatment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1544 KiB  
Systematic Review
Pott’s Puffy Tumor in Young Age: A Systematic Review and Our Experience
by Antonio Daloiso, Tiziana Mondello, Francesco Boaria, Enrico Savietto, Giacomo Spinato, Diego Cazzador and Enzo Emanuelli
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(21), 6428; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216428 - 26 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3130
Abstract
Background: Pott’s Puffy Tumor (PPT) in young-age patients is a rare clinical entity characterized by osteomyelitis of the frontal bone with a subperiosteal abscess collection. Previous reviews primarily consist of small, retrospective case series and anecdotal reports. This study aims to present [...] Read more.
Background: Pott’s Puffy Tumor (PPT) in young-age patients is a rare clinical entity characterized by osteomyelitis of the frontal bone with a subperiosteal abscess collection. Previous reviews primarily consist of small, retrospective case series and anecdotal reports. This study aims to present the largest, most up-to-date systematic review of essential clinical findings, diagnostic modalities, microbiologic considerations, and treatment approaches for managing PPT in pediatric and adolescent populations. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systematically screened until 3 January 2024. The protocol of this investigation was registered on PROSPERO in January 2024, and the systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The study included 184 patients from 109 articles and an additional case from the authors’ institution. Results: PPT commonly stems from untreated rhinosinusitis, respectively, acute pansinusitis, frontal acute rhinosinusitis and chronic rhinosinusitis, and direct head trauma. Infections typically involve a polymicrobial anaerobe-predominant microbiome. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are routinely used for presurgical assessment and posttreatment surveillance. Intracranial complications were significantly associated with the type of surgical treatment (p value < 0.0001). Conclusions: PPT is a significant and relatively morbid disease often under-recognized and misdiagnosed due to its variable clinical presentation. Management includes both antimicrobial therapy and surgical intervention, emphasizing the importance of an interdisciplinary approach. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1724 KiB  
Article
Impact of Educational Films on Antibiotic Prescription among Physicians: A Web-Based Survey in Japan
by Kosaku Komiya, Ryohei Kudoh, Norihito Kaku, Yuichiro Shindo, Tatsuya Hayashi, Kei Kasahara, Tomohiro Oishi, Naruhiko Ishiwada, Makoto Ito, Hiroshi Yotsuyanagi, Naoki Hasegawa, Kazuhiro Tateda, Muneki Hotomi and Katsunori Yanagihara
Antibiotics 2024, 13(8), 724; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13080724 - 1 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2091
Abstract
Although antibiotics are most frequently prescribed for respiratory tract infections, effective interventions for their proper use by physicians have not been fully established. We assessed the impact of educational films on the rates of antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory tract infections using fictitious scenarios. [...] Read more.
Although antibiotics are most frequently prescribed for respiratory tract infections, effective interventions for their proper use by physicians have not been fully established. We assessed the impact of educational films on the rates of antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory tract infections using fictitious scenarios. In this nationwide web-based survey prospective study, a total of 1100 physicians were included. The physicians were required to view educational short films and determine the need for prescribing antibiotics in 10 fictitious scenarios involving adults diagnosed with different acute respiratory tract infectious diseases. The antibiotic prescription rates for each scenario were compared before and after viewing the educational short film. The rates of antibiotic prescription significantly decreased after viewing the educational film, especially in cases with a narrowly defined common cold (from 51% to 15%), mild pharyngolaryngitis (from 71% to 25%), and acute bronchitis without chronic respiratory underlying diseases (from 63% to 23%). Alternatively, a slight decrease in rates was observed in cases with moderate or severe rhinosinusitis (from 94% to 79%), moderate or severe acute pharyngitis (from 88% to 69%), and acute bronchitis with chronic lung disease (from 70% to 58%), for which antibiotics are recommended. Educational short films may encourage the proper use of antibiotics for respiratory tract infections; however, the possibility of undertreatment in patients requiring antibiotics must be considered. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Use and Stewardship in Primary Care)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 208 KiB  
Article
Contemporary Update on the Microbiology of Paranasal Sinusitis
by Margaret B. Mitchell, Alan D. Workman, Richard Lu and Neil Bhattacharyya
Sinusitis 2024, 8(2), 13-19; https://doi.org/10.3390/sinusitis8020003 - 16 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1876
Abstract
Background: Sinusitis, whether acute or chronic, is likely due at least in part to disruptions in the microbiota of the paranasal sinuses. Sinus cultures are often employed to guide medical treatment. Objective: To quantify the contemporary microbiology of the paranasal sinuses and better [...] Read more.
Background: Sinusitis, whether acute or chronic, is likely due at least in part to disruptions in the microbiota of the paranasal sinuses. Sinus cultures are often employed to guide medical treatment. Objective: To quantify the contemporary microbiology of the paranasal sinuses and better understand the utility of paranasal sinus cultures. Methods: We identified patients from 2018 to 2019 with sinus cultures taken by an otolaryngologist in the outpatient setting in our healthcare system with a concurrent diagnosis of acute or chronic rhinosinusitis. These cultures were analyzed based on their culture type and result. The most commonly isolated bacteria were further analyzed by species; Staphylococcus resistance patterns were analyzed as well. Results: A total of 2302 culture samples were collected: 2012 (87%) bacterial, 287 (13%) fungal, and 3 (0.1%) mycobacterial cultures. The results of more than half (1142, 57%) of these bacterial cultures were positive for a named genus, while those of 592 (29%) were positive for normal sinus flora and 16 (0.8%) for normal oral flora, and those of 183 (9%) showed no growth. The results of another 79 (4%) bacterial cultures were positive for unnamed bacteria, which were not further classified (e.g., Gram-negative rods). Of the positive bacterial cultures with named genera, the most common genera identified was Staphylococcus (383, 34%). Of these, the most common species of Staphylococcus was S. aureus (311, 81%), 42 of which (14%) showed methicillin resistance (MRSA). Of the fungal cultures, 265 (92%) resulted in no growth, and all three mycobacterial cultures showed no growth. Conclusions: In contrast to fungal cultures, the majority (57%) of sinus bacterial cultures showed positive results, with the identification of a named genus, highlighting the potential utility of this assay in guiding medical therapy. Full article
12 pages, 1444 KiB  
Article
Clinical Outcomes of Severe Rhinosinusitis Complicated with Cavernous Sinus Syndrome
by Jin-Yi Lin, Chien-Lin Liu, Zheng-Yan Dai, Yu-Ting Li, Yung-An Tsou, Chia-Der Lin, Chih-Jaan Tai and Liang-Chun Shih
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(8), 2420; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082420 - 21 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2339
Abstract
Background: Various diseases involving the cavernous sinus can cause a condition called cavernous sinus syndrome (CSS), which is characterized by ophthalmoplegia or sensory deficits over the face resulting from the compression effect of internal structure. While tumor compression is the most reported cause [...] Read more.
Background: Various diseases involving the cavernous sinus can cause a condition called cavernous sinus syndrome (CSS), which is characterized by ophthalmoplegia or sensory deficits over the face resulting from the compression effect of internal structure. While tumor compression is the most reported cause of CSS, statistical data on CSS caused by infections are limited. Its risk factors, treatment methods, and clinical outcomes are not well-documented. Methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the data of patients admitted to a tertiary medical center from 2015 to 2022 with a diagnosis of acute and chronic sinusitis and at least one diagnostic code for CSS symptoms. We manually reviewed whether patients were involved in two or more of the following cranial nerves (CN): CN III, CN IV, CN V, or CN VI, or at least one of these nerves with a neuroimaging-confirmed lesion in the cavernous sinus. Results: Nine patients were diagnosed with rhinosinusitis-related CSS. The most common comorbidity was type 2 diabetes, and the most common clinical manifestations were diplopia and blurred vision. The sphenoid sinus was the most affected sinus. One patient expired due to a severe brain abscess infection without surgery. The remaining patients underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery, and 50% of the pathology reports indicated fungal infections. Staphylococcus spp. was the most cultured bacteria, and Amoxycillin/Clavulanate was the most used antibiotic. Only four patients had total recovery during the follow-up one year later. Conclusions: CSS is a rare but serious complication of rhinosinusitis. Patients with diabetes and the elderly may be at a higher risk for this complication. Even after treatment, some patients may still have neurological symptoms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Otolaryngology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2258 KiB  
Article
Enhancing Frontal Sinus Surgery: Assessing the Long-Term Impact of Free Grafts and Flaps in Draf III Procedures
by Argyro Leventi, Vasileios Chatzinakis, Georgia Evangelia Papargyriou and Christos Georgalas
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(4), 396; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14040396 - 9 Apr 2024
Viewed by 2478
Abstract
The frontal sinus medial drainage —Draf Type III (modified endoscopic Lothrop) procedure, has become a cornerstone in frontal sinus surgery over the last three decades. Despite its widespread acceptance, challenges such as restenosis and neo-ostium closure persist, prompting the exploration of various preventive [...] Read more.
The frontal sinus medial drainage —Draf Type III (modified endoscopic Lothrop) procedure, has become a cornerstone in frontal sinus surgery over the last three decades. Despite its widespread acceptance, challenges such as restenosis and neo-ostium closure persist, prompting the exploration of various preventive techniques. In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from 111 patients who underwent the Draf III procedure between November 2015 and November 2023, with a mean follow-up period of 3 years and 11 months. Approximately two-thirds of patients (64%) had undergone previous sinus surgery and 16% a previous Draf III. Over half of the patients had inflammatory conditions, with the majority being chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) (46%), while 15% were diagnosed with malignant sinonasal tumors, and 23% with benign sinonasal tumors, of which the commonest was osteoma, accounting for 14 cases. The mean follow-up period was 3 years and 11 months. We focused on evaluating the efficacy of mucosal flaps and free grafts in preventing neo-ostium closure. Although it appears that there is no statistically significant correlation between flap usage and the need for revision surgery or ostium patency maintenance overall, subgroup analysis highlighted the benefits of flap reconstruction in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. In this subgroup, the use of flaps or grafts reduced the rate of neo-ostium stenosis from 20% to 0% (p < 0.05). Overall revision rate was 11.7%—however this was 8% in patients without acute inflammation at the time of surgery and went up to 31% in the presence of pus in the frontal recess (p = 0.02). This study contributes to the existing literature by providing insights into long-term outcomes, the enduring effectiveness of interventions in frontal sinus surgery, and especially the importance of taking into account the underlying pathology when assessing long-term outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 2452 KiB  
Review
Chronic Rhinosinusitis—Microbiological Etiology, Potential Genetic Markers, and Diagnosis
by Michał Michalik and Beata Krawczyk
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(6), 3201; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063201 - 11 Mar 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 5948
Abstract
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a significant public health problem. Bacterial colonization and impaired mucociliary clearance play a significant role in the inflammatory process. Several inflammatory pathways and host defense elements are altered in CRS, which may contribute to observed differences in the microbiome. [...] Read more.
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a significant public health problem. Bacterial colonization and impaired mucociliary clearance play a significant role in the inflammatory process. Several inflammatory pathways and host defense elements are altered in CRS, which may contribute to observed differences in the microbiome. To date, researching CRS has been difficult due to limited access to the studied tissue and a lack of available biomarkers. Ongoing scientific research is increasingly based on simple and objective analytical methods, including sensors, detection with PCR, and sequencing. Future research on microbiota and human factors should also include genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics approaches. This report analyzes the changes that occur in the paranasal sinuses of people with acute and chronic rhinosinusitis, the composition of the microbiota, the human genetic markers that may shed light on the predisposition to CRS, and the advantages and disadvantages of classical and molecular diagnostic methods, as well as addressing the difficulties of sinusitis treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Aetiology, Immunology and Treatment 2.0)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 1644 KiB  
Article
The Effectiveness of Biological Agents on Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis in Patients with Comorbid Asthma: A Multicenter Real-Life Study from Türkiye
by Meryem Demir, Ceyda Tunakan Dalgic, Emine Nihal Mete Gokmen, Recep Savas, Suleyman Eroglu, Guzin Ozden, Cihan Orcen, Gulden Pacaci Cetin, Bahar Arslan, Ferda Bilgir, Gokten Bulut, Nurullah Yekta Akcam, Semiha Ozgul, Pamir Cerci, Raif Coskun, Sercan Gode, Insu Yilmaz and Aytul Zerrin Sin
Medicina 2024, 60(3), 448; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60030448 - 8 Mar 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2226
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Real-life data on the efficacy of biologic agents (BAs) on asthma-comorbid CRSwNP are needed. Our primary goal is to investigate the effects of BAs on CRSwNP symptoms, as well as endoscopic and tomography scores. Our secondary goal is to [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Real-life data on the efficacy of biologic agents (BAs) on asthma-comorbid CRSwNP are needed. Our primary goal is to investigate the effects of BAs on CRSwNP symptoms, as well as endoscopic and tomography scores. Our secondary goal is to show a reduction in the frequency of acute sinusitis exacerbations and the need for surgery. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, real-life study. We screened the patients with asthma-comorbid CRSwNP treated with omalizumab or mepolizumab. A total of 69 patients (40 F/29 M; omalizumab n = 55, mepolizumab n = 14) were enrolled. We compared the visual analog scale (VAS), sinonasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22), nasal congestion score (NCS), Lund–Mackay computed tomography score (LMS), and total endoscopic polyp scores (TPS) before and after BAs. We evaluated the endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) frequencies separately, according to the BAs. Results: The overall median (min–max) age was 43 (21–69) years. The median (min–max) of biologic therapy duration was 35 (4–113) months for omalizumab and 13.5 (6–32) for mepolizumab. Significant improvements were seen in VAS, SNOT-22, and NCS with omalizumab and mepolizumab. A significant decrease was observed in TPS with omalizumab [95% CI: 0–4] (p < 0.001), but not with mepolizumab [95% CI: −0.5–2] (p = 0.335). The frequency of ESS and AECRS were significantly reduced with omalizumab [95% CI: 2–3] (p < 0.001) and [95% CI: 2–5] (p < 0.001); and mepolizumab [95% CI: 0–2] (p = 0.002) and [95% CI: 2–8.5] (p < 0.001), respectively. There was no significant difference in LMS with either of the BAs. Conclusions: Omalizumab and mepolizumab can provide a significant improvement in the sinonasal symptom scores. BAs are promising agents for CRSwNP patients with frequent exacerbations and multiple surgeries. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop