Search Results (117)

The capacity of the United Kingdom (UK) to prosecute technology-enabled financial and economic crime (FEC) is increasingly shaped by the Collingridge dilemma. Even though the dilemma was broadly conceptualized in technology governance, its application to prosecutorial and enforcement practice, evidentiary standards, and criminal liability attribution represents uncharted scholarly territory. Through socio-legal mixed methods combining doctrinal analysis, case studies, and comparative analysis, the paper shows how the dilemma’s two horns or pillars (i.e., early epistemic uncertainty and late institutional inertia) manifest in criminal law and regulatory contexts. The paper finds that just like the European Union and United States, the UK criminal enforcement ecosystem exhibits both horns across cryptocurrency, algorithmic trading, artificial intelligence (AI), and fintech domains. By integrating supplementary theories such as responsive regulation, precautionary principles and technological momentum, the study advances a socio-legal framework that explains enforcement inertia and doctrinal gaps in liability attribution for emerging technologies. The paper demonstrates how epistemic uncertainty and institutional entrenchment shape enforcement outcomes and proposes adaptive strategies for anticipatory governance including technology-literate capacity building, anticipatory legal reform, and data-driven public-private coordination. These recommendations balance ex-ante legal clarity (reducing uncertainty) with ex-post enforcement agility (overcoming entrenchment) to provide a normative framework for navigating the Collingridge dilemma in FEC prosecution. Full article

Historically, the number of United Kingdom (UK) emigrants has exceeded the number of immigrants, but this trend began to change in the early 1970s. The UK government has been enforcing strict immigration controls to reduce the number of immigrants, especially asylum seekers. The country even left the European Union to better control its borders and consider new arrivals based on their skills. However, despite tighter immigration policies, long-term international migration to the UK has continued to grow. The ongoing, and to some extent gendered and racialised, migration fix has not provided a sustainable solution for the country. Instead, it has increased the vulnerability and anxiety of refugees, asylum seekers, and other migrants. Informed by a scoping review and the concept migration fix, this article examines UK immigration policies since World War II. This article is important for understanding the migration fix in UK immigration and asylum policies and their effects on asylum seekers, refugees, and other migrants. Full article

The Isles of Scilly are an archipelago of islands in the far southwest of the UK which contain numerous beds of wild bivalve molluscs which are recreationally harvested for local consumption. However, the islands have never previously been assessed for the presence of harmful algae and their shellfish toxin metabolites which can cause serious human health impacts. This study sought to address these knowledge gaps through the analysis of seawater and shellfish tissues for microalgae and toxins utilizing portable and lab-based microscopy, nanopore sequencing, chemical analysis and immunoassay kits. The study design was affected by the national COVID-19 lockdown which enforced implementation of citizen-led sampling and in-field microscopy. Microscopy and sequencing approaches led to the confirmation of multiple HAB species of concern, including those potentially responsible for production of neurotoxic and diarrhetic shellfish toxins. A portable microscope was successfully utilized in the field for recognition of microalgae and for early warning of potential shellfish toxicity events. Chemical analysis of cockle, clam and mussel samples confirmed the detection of paralytic, diarrhetic and amnesic shellfish toxins, with an unusual okadaic acid group toxin profile reaching a maximum toxicity of approximately half the regulatory limit as defined by EU law. The Sensoreal Alert Lateral Flow Assay was used to screen and highlight samples containing higher concentrations of DSP toxins. Furthermore, Tetrodotoxin was detected for the first time in the UK in cockle and grooved carpet shells. Multiple saxitoxin analogues were also detected in two echinoderm species, with this providing the first ever report of paralytic shellfish toxins in the spiny starfish, Marthasterias glacialis. The toxin profiles in the two species varied significantly with a dominance of GTX4 in Luidia ciliaris as opposed to a dominance of STX in Marthasterias glacialis. Overall, the study showed that a multi-method assessment of a previously unexplored region within the UK territory contained microalgae and toxins of concern to human health, and that a citizen-led programme could be instigated using portable microscopy and rapid toxin testing to assess the early warning for potentially harmful microalgae and toxins in the region, with confirmatory analysis being conducted to establish actual levels of risk for local consumers of seafood. Full article

Background: Medical mediation offers a patient-centered, collaborative alternative to traditional resolution methods for healthcare conflicts that is gaining international traction in an increasingly complex environment of advancing technology and diverse patient populations. This systematic review aims to synthesize the literature on medical mediation and analyze its clinical applications, conflict typologies, involved actors, mediation methodologies, legal frameworks, and theoretical underpinnings. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus for English-language articles published between 1984 and 2025. Results: Of 656 initial records, 152 studies met the inclusion criteria and were categorized across six domains: clinical context, actors involved, conflict type, mediation framework, legal/policy structure, and theoretical foundations. Most studies originated from high-income countries, particularly the U.S. and U.K., with notable expansion after 2010. Medical mediation was most frequently applied in bedside care, end-of-life decision-making, and managed-care disputes. While ethics consultants were the primary mediators, increasing involvement of trained clinicians and institutional actors was also observed. Most studies emphasized generic bioethical mediation frameworks, with some focused on formalized models and training. Legal frameworks varied, and an increasing number of countries have been adopting institutional or national programs to support mediation. Conclusions: Medical mediation is an efficient tool for resolving complex clinical conflicts, enhancing communication, and preserving therapeutic relationships. Its institutionalization, through law and training, is key to the promotion of justice, transparency, and ethical integrity in modern healthcare systems. Full article

The durability of Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysers (PEMWEs) under intermittent renewable power is a critical challenge for scaling green hydrogen. This study investigates the influence of solar intermittency on PEMWE performance and degradation in direct-coupled photovoltaic (PV) systems by comparing two contrasting climates: Muscat, Oman (hot-arid, high irradiance) and Brighton, UK (temperate, variable irradiance). A validated physics-based model, incorporating reversible, activation, ohmic, and concentration overpotentials along with empirical degradation laws for catalyst decay, membrane thinning, and interfacial resistance growth, was applied to hourly PV-generation data. The results indicate that Muscat’s high irradiance (985 MWh year⁻¹) produced nearly double Brighton’s hydrogen yield (14,018 kg vs. 7566 kg) and longer operational hours (3269 h vs. 2244 h), but at the cost of accelerated degradation (359.8 μV h⁻¹ vs. 231.4 μV h⁻¹). In contrast, Brighton’s cooler and more humid climate preserved efficiency (65.8% vs. 59.8%) and reduced degradation, although higher daily cycling and seasonal variability constrained total output. The findings reveal a climate-dependent trade-off: hot, stable regions maximise hydrogen productivity at the expense of lifespan, whereas variable, cooler climates extend durability but limit yield. By explicitly linking intermittency to performance and ageing, this work provides a location-specific assessment of PEMWE feasibility, supporting design and operation strategies for renewable hydrogen deployment. Full article

Racialised minority populations were disproportionately affected by COVID-19 and saw the highest rate of COVID-19 infections and mortality. Low socioeconomic status, working as frontline workers, temporary employment, precarious immigration status and pre-existing medical conditions were factors that contributed to disadvantaged experiences. This systematic review looked at the impact of COVID-19 on racialised minority populations globally, recognising their experiences, perspectives and the effects on their physical and mental health. Eight electronic databases were searched (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Social Policy and Practice (SPP), Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), MedRxiv and Research Square) for English language qualitative studies. Reference lists of relevant literature reviews and reference lists of articles were hand-searched for additional potentially relevant articles. Duplicates were removed, and articles were screened for titles and abstracts, followed by full-text screening. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess the quality of the included studies (n = 70). Data were synthesised using thematic synthesis. Seven major and three minor themes were identified. The major themes related to (i) children and young people’s experiences of COVID-19; (ii) exacerbated pre-existing disparities relating to income, employment and housing security, health insurance and immigration status; (iii) lack of knowledge and information about COVID-19 and COVID-19 misinformation; (iv) racial history of medicine and treatment of racialised populations; (v) contemporary experiences of racism; (vi) impact on physical and mental health and wellbeing; (vii) concerns about safety at work. Minor themes related to (a) experiences of intercommunity mutual aid; (b) adherence to preventative guidance/COVID-19 restrictions; (c) the role of faith. Research needs to focus on developing and testing interventions that support transformation of social, cultural and economic systems towards equity of access to healthcare and healthcare knowledge. Research should be cognisant of interventions that have worked in shifting the equity dial in the past, implement these and use them to inform new approaches. Policy and practice should be mechanisms for enabling the implementation of interventions. Full article

The United Kingdom (UK) government continues exploring ways to externalise its border controls to deter people from travelling to its shores. States, including the UK, use externalised border controls to reduce responsibility and avoid legal obligations through distance-creation in a manifestation of ‘irresponsibilisation’. They argue that extraterritorial border controls do not trigger their obligations under international refugee and human rights law, which are primarily territorial in scope. Were such claims true, they would create accountability gaps, allowing states to evade responsibility through cooperation and offshoring their legal duties. This paper challenges this view. It introduces a ‘responsibility spectrum’ applicable to the UK and other states’ actions involving externalised border controls, especially offshore processing of asylum claims or returns. The argument demonstrates that responsibility can arise for breaches of negative obligations, aiding and assisting a state, or violations of positive obligations. It emphasises that, despite the difficulties posed by ‘irresponsibilisation’, international law will ensure the UK is held accountable for any breaches it facilitates through any future externalisation policies. Full article

Background: This article presents an international comparative review of involuntary psychiatric care, Community Treatment Orders (CTOs), and forensic mental health services, with operational implications for Italy. Italy has a community-based model inspired by the “Basaglia Law” (Law No. 180/1978), emphasizing deinstitutionalization and continuity of care. Nevertheless, risk governance gaps persist for high-complexity patients, imposing a disproportionate legal and clinical burden on mental health professionals. This group includes individuals who refuse treatment despite meeting criteria for compulsory admission, patients at elevated risk with substantial management complexity, and offenders with a current or suspected psychiatric disorder. Methods: We conducted a comparative legal and policy review across seven jurisdictions (Italy, England and Wales (UK), France, Germany, Spain, the United States, and Canada) to map frameworks for involuntary treatment, forensic services, CTOs (or equivalents), and community-based risk management. We also extracted procedural safeguards, duration and renewal limits, and interfaces with forensic services. Results: CTOs are available in five of the seven jurisdictions (England and Wales, France, Spain, the United States, and Canada) but are absent in Italy and Germany. We propose a three-pillar framework: (1) enforceable outpatient measures, including CTOs; (2) Forensic Psychiatry Units within Local Health Authorities; and (3) oversight boards with judicial, clinical, and social representatives. These components aim to redistribute responsibility, ensure continuity of care, and provide proportional oversight within a least restrictive, graduated system. Conclusions: When narrowly targeted, time limited, and paired with robust safeguards and service-quality standards, CTOs can support adherence and continuity for patients who repeatedly disengage from care. For Italy, integrating this instrument within the three-pillar framework and under independent oversight could strengthen patient rights and public safety, reduce revolving-door admissions, and improve outcomes. Full article

Case order effects, where decision-makers resolve dilemmas differently depending on the order in which cases are presented, are well established in the psychology of moral decision-making. Yet this type of order effect has rarely been studied in a legal context. Given the integral importance of consistency and precedent to the law, we sought to test for the existence of case order effects in legal decisions. Participants across five studies (total n = 1023) were given pairs of life-or-death legal cases to decide, consisting of one decision generally viewed positively in isolation, and one decision negatively viewed, with the order of presentation being varied (positive before negative vs. negative before positive). Studies included civil and criminal cases and individual and group decision-making. Results demonstrated that the case order effects previously seen in the moral context also held in the legal context. Order effects were asymmetric, with responses to one case remaining stable while responses to the other being labile, depending on the order presented. A particularly novel finding was of responses to labile cases becoming less, rather than more, similar to responses to preceding cases. Order effects can be readily triggered in the context of legal decision-making, suggesting legal precedent may be partially dependent on the order in which cases are determined. The asymmetric and previously undiscovered direction of these order effects is not consistent with existing consistency-type theories which predict effects to be symmetrical and more similar to previous cases and the findings are only partially consistent with salience-type theories. Full article

In this article, I argue that the state creates legal advice deserts in immigration and asylum by designing law and policy which drive up legal need, driving down provision through unfavourable conditions for providers, and by placing people in need into areas from which they have no realistic prospect of accessing legal advice and representation. I draw on frameworks of spatial justice and of demand to analyse the impact of the legislative and policy developments in the Special Issue’s focal period of 2022–24 on legal aid in each of the UK’s three legal aid systems: England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. The legislative changes included introducing new stages into asylum law, which created new legal needs. Policy changes drove a wholesale geographical shift in demand as all local authorities in the UK (except Scilly) now host people in the asylum process. The changes depended upon the involvement of legal aid lawyers in order to be workable, but the marketised model of legal aid provision in England and Wales, and the low-paid laissez faire model in Northern Ireland, are fundamentally incompatible with that demand. I conclude by arguing that legal aid cannot be an afterthought. Asylum policy should be shaped to reduce failure demand, while legal aid policy should be funded and designed so as to pay for the necessary provision, with interventions to remove the spatial inequalities in access to (legal) justice. Full article

This article argues that the asylum policy and legislative changes introduced by the UK government in the years 2022–2024 altered the original meaning of the concept ‘safe country’ as understood in international and EU law. The UK modified this concept, which from a solidarity concept became a means of exclusion, and which negatively affects the lives and rights of people seeking asylum in the UK. Using a doctrinal approach, the first part of this article sets the legal and historical context of the concept ‘safe country’. Departing from the analysis of the Refugee Convention, the article discusses how this mechanism was used by the EU legislation. From an idea of solidarity among EU Member States, it shifted from responsibility-sharing to burden-sharing while still allowing some guarantees to people seeking asylum. Using content analysis, the second part of this article evaluates the legal requirements set by the UK legislation together with implications of applying the ‘safe country’ concept to the asylum claims. It argues that, in recent years, the UK Government used the term ‘safe country’ as synonym of two (possibly three) different concepts, such as ‘first safe country’ and ‘safe third country’. It also shifted and pushed its meaning beyond the current commonly agreed interpretation of the term because it eroded the requirement of a link between the person seeking asylum and the ‘safe country’. Thus, the UK legislation deviated even further from the rationale underlying the Refugee Convention, international human rights standards and EU legislation because it passed the obligation to assess asylum claims to states with no link to people seeking asylum and without adequate risk assessment. The final part of this article discusses the limit to this policy and analyses the legal battle between the UK Parliament, the Government’s executive power, the UK Supreme Court and the Belfast High Court, which barred the UK Government from deporting people seeking asylum to a third country. This article concludes that there is some irony in the fact the term ‘safe country’ has been weaponised as a bordering tool by the UK Government, but ‘a border’ between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland is limiting the negative effect of the concept ‘safe country’ on the very same people that is attempting to exclude from protection. Full article

Utilising Arendt’s ‘right to have rights’ thesis not only as an observation on citizenship but as an intrinsic eligibility and political opportunity for the stateless, this paper outlines how the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 and Illegal Migration Act 2023 do not merely continue the general trend of criminalising migrants but take the further step of socially distancing the securitised migrant object. The recent legislation provides that those who arrive in the UK via ‘irregular means’ (i.e., small boats) will likely have their asylum claims deemed ‘inadmissible’. The lack of a ‘negotiated settlement’ in the asylum complex has been well noted; however, the systematic prejudgement and consequent bureaucratic social distancing inherent in the new legislation now threatens to remove even the prospect of negotiation. The means of arrival instantly proving decisive precludes the possibility for asylum seekers to present evidence that they are genuine refugees, and, with it, the politico-legal space and opportunity for the ‘irregular’ person to generally make themselves seen and heard is maliciously obstructed. The result is not just the denial of humanity and concomitant human dues (rights), but a distinct move towards denial of even the possibility of humanity (the right to have rights). Such works to distance system administrators from issues of vulnerability, assuredly direful consequences, and humanness itself, as is essential for the expansion of a system where basic human rights are so lacking. Full article

Durian is a major tropical crop in Southeast Asia, but its yield and quality are severely impacted by a range of pests and diseases. Manual inspection remains the dominant detection method but suffers from high labor intensity, low accuracy, and difficulty in scaling. To address these challenges, this paper proposes EN-YOLO, a novel enhanced YOLO-based deep learning model that integrates the EfficientNet backbone and multimodal attention mechanisms for precise detection of durian pests and diseases. The model removes redundant feature layers and introduces a large-span residual edge to preserve key spatial information. Furthermore, a multimodal input strategy—incorporating RGB, near-infrared and thermal imaging—is used to enhance robustness under variable lighting and occlusion. Experimental results on real orchard datasets demonstrate that EN-YOLO outperforms YOLOv8 (You Only Look Once version 8), YOLOv5-EB (You Only Look Once version 5—Efficient Backbone), and Fieldsentinel-YOLO in detection accuracy, generalization, and small-object recognition. It achieves a 95.3% counting accuracy and shows superior performance in ablation and cross-scene tests. The proposed system also supports real-time drone deployment and integrates an expert knowledge base for intelligent decision support. This work provides an efficient, interpretable, and scalable solution for automated pest and disease management in smart agriculture. Full article

The welfare of decapod crustaceans held in captivity, whether in aquariums, holding facilities, seafood restaurants, supermarkets, or fishmongers, is attracting growing attention and concern. This review focuses on three species that are commonly found in European commercial environments: the European spiny lobster (Palinurus elephas), the European lobster (Homarus gammarus), and the American lobster (Homarus americanus). We examine the biology and behavioural ecology of these decapods, emphasising their natural habits and environmental requirements. Based on current scientific knowledge, we propose conditions for their confinement that better align with their biological and behavioural needs. These crustaceans are commonly subjected to stressful captive environments characterised by overcrowding, claw immobilisation through banding, an absence of shelter or hiding spaces, and continuous exposure to direct lighting. Such practices contrast starkly with the animals’ innate behaviours and natural habitats, likely compromising their physical health and psychological welfare. It is thereby recommended that spiny lobsters and lobsters be kept separated and stocked at an appropriate density, that each animal should be provided with a shelter and have enough space to turn around, that true lobsters should never have their claws tied, that no direct light should be placed above the aquaria, and that water quality should be routinely monitored. By exploring the welfare challenges associated with confining these species, this review aims to promote a more ethical and humane approach to their care in commercial settings, and to encourage practices that enhance their quality of life in captivity. Full article

Background: The provision of education, health, and social care for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) in England has long been criticised for its inequities and chronic underfunding. These systemic issues were further exacerbated by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the accompanying restrictions, which disrupted essential services and resulted in widespread unmet needs and infringements on the rights of many children with SEND. This study aimed to use a three-phase consensus-building approach with 1353 participants across five stakeholder groups to collaboratively develop evidence-informed priorities for policy and practice. The priorities sought to help address the longstanding disparities and respond to the intensified challenges brought about by the pandemic. Methods: A total of 55 children with SEND (aged 5–16), 893 parents/carers, and 307 professionals working in SEND-related services participated in the first phase through online surveys. This was followed by semi-structured interviews with four children and young people, ten parents/carers, and 15 professionals, allowing for deeper exploration of lived experiences and priorities. The data were analysed, synthesised, and structured into five overarching areas of priority. These were subsequently discussed and refined in a series of activity-based group workshops involving 20 children with SEND, 11 parents/carers, and 38 professionals. Results and Conclusions: The consensus-building process led to the identification of key priorities for both pandemic response and longer-term recovery, highlighting the responsibilities of central Government and statutory services to consider and meet the needs of children with SEND. These priorities are framed within a children’s rights context and considered against the rights and duties set out in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989). Priorities include protecting and promoting children with SEND’s rights to (1) play, socialise, and be part of a community, (2) receive support for their social and emotional wellbeing and mental health, (3) feel safe, belong, and learn in school, (4) “access health and social care services and therapies”, and (5) receive support for their parents/carers and families. Together, they highlight the urgent need for structural reform to ensure that children with SEND receive the support they are entitled to—not only in times of crisis but as a matter of routine practice and policy. Full article