Search Results (16)

Background/Objectives: We aimed to determine safe and immunogenic RSVpreF vaccine dose levels for further clinical development in 2–<18 year olds. Methods: The phase 1, age-descending, open-label Picasso trial evaluated different RSVpreF dose levels in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-seropositive 2–<5 year olds and 5–<18 year olds who were either healthy or had chronic medical conditions with increased RSV illness risk. Participants received a single dose of RSVpreF (60 µg or 120 µg dose level). The primary objective was to describe safety and tolerability at each dose level and age group, including frequencies of reactogenicity and adverse events (AEs). The secondary objective was to describe RSV neutralizing antibody responses at each dose level and age group 1 month after vaccination. Results: Overall, 127 participants received RSVpreF 60 µg (2–<5 year olds, n = 20; 5–<18 year olds, n = 35) or 120 µg (n = 24 and n = 48, respectively); 54% were male and 69% were White. Local reactions and systemic events were reported in 17–20% and 33–45% of 2–<5 year olds, respectively, and 49–56% and 52–60% of 5–<18 year olds; most were mild or moderate in severity. AEs were reported in 13–15% of 2–<5 year olds and 8–14% of 5–<18 year olds. No AEs leading to withdrawal or vaccine-related serious AEs were reported. RSV-A and RSV-B neutralizing titer geometric mean fold rises from before to 1 month after vaccination with RSVpreF 60 and 120 µg, which were 17.7–20.6 and 42.8–39.8, respectively, in 2–<5 year olds, and 19.0–23.5 and 20.3–20.3, respectively, in 5–<18 year olds. Conclusions: RSVpreF was safe, well tolerated, and elicited immune responses in RSV-seropositive 2–<18-year-old participants, supporting further clinical development in this pediatric population, including those with chronic conditions. Full article

Background/objectives: RSV is a major cause of mortality in infants, and despite recent progress to prevent RSV in the very young, an RSV vaccine for this population is still highly warranted. Clinical studies in infants in the 1960s using formalin-inactivated RSV (FI-RSV) led to life-threatening enhanced respiratory disease (ERD). Therefore, a thorough safety assessment of RSV vaccine candidates intended for RSV seronegative infants is crucial. Methods: Prior to clinical pediatric development of Ad26.RSV.preF, an adenovirus type 26 vector-encoding RSV F protein stabilized in its prefusion conformation, predisposition to ERD was extensively assessed in cotton rat and mouse models. Results: Cotton rats intramuscularly immunized with a wide dose range of Ad26.RSV.preF, including low and sub-protective vaccine doses, and challenged with vaccine homologous RSV A2 or heterologous RSV B Wash 18537, did not show signs of predisposition to ERD. Histopathology scores for alveolitis, peribronchiolitis, interstitial pneumonia, and perivasculitis after challenge were significantly lower for Ad26.RSV.preF-immunized cotton rats compared to FI-RSV-immunized cotton rats and comparable to or lower than scores in cotton rats intranasally pre-exposed to RSV prior to challenge to mimic natural repeated infection. These results were observed in animals with or without viral replication in the lung after RSV challenge, in the presence or absence of vaccine-induced antibodies. Similar results were observed in mice, where more extensive assessment of mono- and polymorphonuclear cell alveolitis, mucus cell hyperplasia, and mucus accumulation was performed. Conclusions: Based on these extensive analyses, we conclude that there are no indications of ERD predisposition after Ad26.RSV.preF vaccination in rodent models, irrespective of the vaccine dose, challenge virus strain, or presence of viral replication in the lung. These results are crucial for the pediatric development of this vaccine. Full article

Background/Objectives: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of lower respiratory tract infection in young children, especially during infancy, resulting in substantial morbidity and mortality. Methods: Acknowledging the real-world evidence on RSV immunization, the College of Pediatrics, Academy of Medicine of Malaysia, has appointed an expert panel to develop a position paper on recommendations for infant and/or maternal vaccination against childhood RSV, specifically in the Malaysian context with year-round RSV activity. Results: Recognizing the potential constraints and limitations in the implementation process, the expert panel recommends targeted immunization with long-acting RSV monoclonal antibody (mAb) for high-risk infants as a pragmatic first step, with subsequent scale-up to universal immunization of infants when resources permit. Conclusions: Immunization is the most effective strategy to prevent RSV-related lower respiratory tract infection in childhood. Year-round maternal vaccination between 28 and 36 weeks’ gestation, combined with immunization at six months for all infants, may potentially circumvent the unclear seasonality. Full article

Background/Objectives: HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) infants experience increased severe respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract illness (RSV-LRTI) rates compared with HIV-unexposed infants. Maternal bivalent RSVpreF vaccination can prevent infant RSV-LRTI but data from HEU infants are lacking. Methods: This phase 3 randomized, double-blinded trial assessed RSVpreF safety and immunogenicity in pregnant participants from South Africa living with HIV and their infants. Maternal participants with stable HIV disease taking antiretroviral therapy received RSVpreF or placebo (24–36 weeks’ gestation). Primary safety endpoints included reactogenicity through 7 days after vaccination (maternal participants), adverse events (AEs) through 1 month after vaccination (maternal participants) or birth (infants), and serious AEs (SAEs) throughout the study (maternal participants) or through 6 months after birth (infants). Immune responses were evaluated by 50% RSV-A and RSV-B neutralizing titers prevaccination and at delivery (maternal participants) or birth (infants). Results: Overall, 343 maternal participants received RSVpreF (n = 172) or placebo (n = 171). Most reactogenicity events were mild/moderate. AEs and SAEs were generally reported at similar frequencies in maternal RSVpreF and placebo groups including percentages of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. There were no safety concerns in infants; percentages of reported AEs and SAEs were generally similar between RSVpreF and placebo groups and no difference in preterm birth. RSVpreF elicited high maternal neutralizing RSV-A and RSV-B immune responses, with efficient RSV antibody transplacental transfer to infants demonstrated by levels greater than the placebo group at birth (geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of RSVpreF to placebo were 7.8 for RSV-A and 6.8 for RSV-B) and by comparison with a cohort of HIV-unexposed infants from the pivotal phase 3 efficacy trial (GMRs of HEU to HIV-unexposed infants were 0.86 for RSV-A and 0.72 for RSV-B). Conclusions: These results support maternal RSVpreF vaccination among those living with stable HIV for preventing RSV-LRTI in HEU infants. (NCT06325657). Full article

Background/Objectives: Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a common respiratory tract infection that accounts for significant morbidity and mortality, particularly among older adults. From 1 August 2024, the bivalent RSVpreF vaccine (Abrysvo^®) was introduced in Scotland for eligible older adults. While clinical trials and post-licensure studies showed a good safety profile of the vaccine, post-marketing observational studies in the United States reported a small increased risk of Guillain–Barré Syndrome (GBS) among older adult populations. Methods: We conducted observed versus expected (OE) and self-controlled case series (SCCS) analyses to retrospectively monitor the incidence of hospital admission for 39 conditions, including GBS. This was undertaken in post-RSV-vaccination periods from 1 August to 31 December 2024, among eligible adults aged 74 to 80 years in Scotland. Results: Observed versus expected analyses identified an increased risk of hospitalisation with GBS in the 1–28-day post-vaccination period. From SCCS analyses, six conditions showed an increased risk in post-vaccination periods (acute coronary syndrome, acute myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, GBS, heart failure and stroke (haemorrhagic)). After temporal adjustment, only GBS remained significant. All 10 hospitalised GBS cases occurred in the 10 to 16 days post-vaccination. Excess risk of GBS was estimated to be 46.1 cases per one million doses. Conclusions: Study results indicated a good safety profile of the RSV vaccine for older eligible adults aged 75 to 79 years, although a small increased risk of GBS was identified in both analyses. Excess risk levels of GBS from vaccination align with other studies. Full article

Background/objectives: This was a post hoc analysis of safety data across the bivalent respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F (RSVpreF) vaccine clinical trial development program. Methods: Data from eight clinical trials in 46,913 immunocompetent adults who received RSVpreF or placebo were analyzed. Local reactions and systemic events were assessed among non-pregnant ≥18-year-olds (n = 9517); adverse events (AEs) among pregnant and non-pregnant 18–59-year-olds (n = 9238); and vaccine-related AEs among non-pregnant ≥18-year-olds (n = 39,314). Post-marketing data in non-pregnant adults were considered. Results: Local reactions and systemic events were reported more frequently in RSVpreF versus placebo recipients; injection site pain was the most common local reaction (RSVpreF, 18.9%; placebo, 7.4%), and fatigue (23.5%; 18.4%) and headache (19.5%; 15.0%) were the most common systemic events. Percentages of AEs within 1 month after vaccination were similar across groups (RSVpreF, 12.8%; placebo, 13.1%); severe AEs were reported in ≤1.5% of participants. Differences in percentages of individuals reporting vaccine-related AEs between the RSVpreF and placebo groups were <0.2% for all related AEs. Serious AEs throughout the study were reported in ≤14.0% (RSVpreF, 12.6%; placebo, 14.0%). No atrial fibrillation, Guillain-Barré syndrome, or acute polyneuropathy cases were reported. The AE data from post-marketing data sources were consistent with the safety profile from the clinical trial program, with no new safety concerns. Conclusions: Integrated data demonstrated that RSVpreF was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile in non-pregnant and pregnant adults. Ongoing surveillance through real-world use and clinical trial experience continue to support the safety profile of RSVpreF. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03529773/NCT04071158/NCT04785612/NCT05035212/NCT05096208/NCT05842967/NCT04032093/NCT04424316. Full article

Background: Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among lung transplant (LTx) recipients. Therapeutic options are limited, emphasizing the importance of prevention. The Arexvy^® vaccine (RSVPreF3) showed promising efficacy among immunocompetent adults; however, data on its immunogenicity in solid organ transplant recipients remain unclear. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study, including all LTx recipients who were vaccinated with Arexvy in February 2024. Baseline and follow-up serum samples (1, 3, and 6 months post-vaccination) were analyzed for antibody responses using a commercial RSV ELISA kit and micro-neutralization assays against historical reference RSV A/B ATCC strains and seasonal RSV strains. Adverse events were documented. Results: A total of 28 recipients received the vaccine. Twenty-one (75%) were male, and the median age was 62 years (interquartile range [IQR], 53–67). The median time from transplant was 486 days (IQR, 243–966). Vaccination elicited strong immunogenic responses, demonstrating a twofold increase in ELISA-determined antibody levels at one month post-vaccination, which were sustained for six months. At one month, 67% of recipients had antibody levels exceeding the cutoff threshold. Micro-neutralization assays showed a significant increase in neutralizing antibodies against all tested variants (RSV A/B ATCC and seasonal RSV A/B), with titers remaining at least twofold higher than pre-vaccination levels. No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate a sustained antibody response to the Arexvy^® vaccine in a cohort of LTx recipients, with antibody titers sustained over six months. Further research is needed to assess the long-term durability of the immune response and the potential immunogenicity of this vaccine in LTx populations. Full article

Background/Objectives: Individuals with immunocompromising conditions are at high risk of developing severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) illness. This phase 3, single-arm study assessed the safety and immunogenicity of the bivalent RSV prefusion F protein−based (RSVpreF) 120-µg vaccine in immunocompromised and renally impaired adults. Methods: Participants were stratified by age group (18−<60-year-olds; ≥60-year-olds) and received two RSVpreF doses 1 month apart (i.e., Dose 1 and Dose 2, respectively). Reactogenicity events were collected for 7 days after each dose; adverse events through 1 month after the last dose; and serious adverse events, adverse events of special interest, and newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions throughout the study. Results: One month after Dose 1, RSVpreF elicited robust immune responses overall and across age and immunocompromised subgroups. Overall, geometric mean fold rises from before to 1 month after Dose 1 were high for RSV A and RSV B (8.3 and 9.0, respectively); no additional increases 1 month after Dose 2 (7.5 and 7.8) were observed. The most frequent local reaction was pain at the injection site, which was more common after Dose 2 than after Dose 1. The most frequent systemic event after any dose was fatigue. Most local reactions and systemic events were mild or moderate in severity. Adverse event and serious adverse event rates were 13.5% and 7.3% among 18−<60-year-olds and 22.4% and 14.0% among ≥60-year-olds, respectively. Conclusions: A single dose of the RSVpreF vaccine conferred robust immune responses in immunocompromised and renally impaired adults with no safety concerns. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05842967). Full article

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common cause of acute respiratory infection (ARI). The risk of severe RSV outcomes is higher among older adults (OAs) and individuals with chronic diseases (high risk, HR). AS01_E-adjuvanted RSV preFusion protein 3 OA vaccine (adjuvanted RSVPreF3 OA is approved for the prevention of lower respiratory tract disease [LRTD] due to RSV in OAs). The objective of this study was to assess the potential public health impact of an RSV vaccination program using adjuvanted RSVPreF3 OA in adults ≥75 years (y) and HR adults ≥60 y in Italy. Methods: A static multi-cohort Markov model was used to estimate the number of RSV cases and associated health outcomes projected in adults ≥75 y and HR adults ≥60 y with no RSV vaccination or with a single dose of adjuvanted RSVPreF3 OA. Epidemiological, healthcare resource use and cost data were obtained from the scientific literature. Vaccine efficacy and waning inputs were based on results from the AReSVi-006 phase III clinical trial. Several scenarios for vaccine coverage were explored. Results: Assuming the target vaccination rate for influenza vaccination in Italy (75%), the model predicted that vaccinating Italian adults ≥75 y and the HR population ≥ 60 y with adjuvanted RSVPreF3 OA would reduce the number of RSV-LRTD events by 43%, leading to a reduction in associated emergency department visits, hospitalizations, complications, deaths, and direct healthcare costs over a 3-year period. Conclusions: The vaccination of Italians aged ≥ 75 y and HR individuals aged ≥ 60 y using the adjuvanted RSVPreF3 OA vaccine has the potential to offer substantial public health benefits by reducing the burden of RSV disease. Full article

Concomitant administration may improve vaccination rates. This analysis of a phase 1/2 randomized study included 1073 healthy ≥65-year-olds who previously received ≥3 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses. Participants received concomitantly administered RSVpreF and bivalent BA.4/BA.5-adapted BNT162b2 vaccine (concomitant administration) with or without quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV), admixed combined RSVpreF + BNT162b2 vaccine (combined vaccine) with or without QIV, RSVpreF, BNT162b2, or QIV. Immunogenicity objectives included demonstrating the noninferiority of neutralizing antibody titers elicited by concomitant administration and combined vaccine compared with RSVpreF or BNT162b2 administered alone, and by concomitant administration and combined vaccine given with QIV compared with RSVpreF, BNT162b2, and QIV alone. Reactogenicity (≤7 days) and safety ≤1 month (adverse events (AEs)) and ≤6 months (serious AEs (SAEs)) after vaccination were assessed. Noninferiority for all immunogenicity comparisons was demonstrated. All vaccine groups were well tolerated; no new safety concerns were identified. Reactogenicity was mostly mild/moderate with rates generally similar across groups, except injection site pain and fatigue, which were less frequent with RSVpreF + placebo vs. other groups. AEs were infrequent, mostly mild/moderate, occurring at similar frequencies across groups. No AEs leading to study withdrawal or vaccine-related SAEs were reported. Favorable safety and tolerability alongside similar immunogenicity provide support for concomitant or combined use of RSVpreF and BNT162b2, with or without QIV, to help protect older adults from these important respiratory pathogens (NCT05886777). Full article

Background/Objectives: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of respiratory infections in children. A novel RSVpreF vaccine for use among pregnant women for the prevention of RSV in infants is expected to be licensed in Mexico. Hence, the clinical and economic burden of RSV among infants in Mexico, with and without a year-round RSVpreF maternal vaccination program, was estimated. Methods: A cohort model was developed to project clinical and economic outcomes of RSV from birth to 1 year of age for maternal vaccination and no intervention. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated from direct cost outcomes, life years, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The value per dose of the RSVpreF for which the program would be cost-effective was explored. Analyses were conducted from the healthcare system perspective, with direct costs (2024 Mexican Pesos [MXN]) and outcomes discounted at 5% annually; scenario and sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of model settings and inputs. Results: Compared to no intervention, a year-round RSVpreF vaccine administered to 1891 M pregnant women would prevent 15,768 hospitalizations, 5505 emergency department cases, and 5505 physician office visits annually, averting MXN 1754 M in direct medical costs with an increase of 3402 life years or 3666 QALYs. The RSVpreF vaccine would be cost-saving up to MXN 1301/dose and cost-effective up to MXN 2105–MXN 3715/dose under an assumed cost-effectiveness threshold range of 1–3× the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita (MXN 247,310) per QALY gained. Conclusions: Year-round RSVpreF maternal vaccination would substantially reduce RSV’s clinical and economic burden among infants in Mexico and likely be a cost-effective program. Full article

Background and Objectives: Three respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines have been recently made available for older adults. Understanding the principal characteristics of the first vaccine-takers can pave the way for a successful vaccination campaign. The objective of this study was to explore the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the first Italian users of an adjuvanted RSV vaccine and their attitudes towards RSV and vaccination. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2024 in Liguria (Italy). Individuals aged ≥60 years with no contraindications to the adjuvanted vaccine RSVPreF3 OA were eligible. Following vaccination, subjects filled in a questionnaire, which comprised items on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, attitudes towards RSV and RSV vaccination and a vaccination trust indicator (VTI). Results: A total of 453 vaccinees completed the survey. Their mean age was 74.9 ± 8.0 years, and 50.6% were males. Nine of ten (89.2%) individuals had ≥1 co-morbidity, of which cardiovascular conditions (70.4%), respiratory diseases (27.6%) and diabetes (18.5%) were the most common. Uptake of the routine vaccines was high: 91.2% and 98.7% received the 2023/2024 season influenza and ≥2 COVID-19 vaccines, respectively. The most common reasons for the current RSV vaccination were general practitioner advice (43.9%), followed by the willingness to be protected against (20.8%) and feelings of being at risk (16.6%) of RSV. The average VTI score was 91.5%, suggesting high trust in vaccines. More positive attitudes towards RSV vaccination were observed (p < 0.01) among subjects who received more COVID-19 vaccine doses, whose reasons for the current RSV vaccination were the willingness to be protected or to be in good health and the feeling of being at risk for RSV. Conclusions: The first Italian users of the novel RSVPreF3 OA vaccine were represented by high-risk individuals with a comparatively high prevalence of co-morbidities, high uptake of the seasonal respiratory vaccines and high trust in immunization. Full article

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections usually cause mild, cold-like symptoms in most people, but are a leading infectious disease causing infant death and hospitalization and can result in increased morbidity and mortality in older adults and at-risk individuals. Pfizer has developed Abrysvo^®, an unadjuvanted bivalent recombinant protein subunit vaccine containing prefusion-stabilized fusion (F) proteins representing RSV A and RSV B subgroups (RSVpreF). It is the only RSV vaccine approved for both maternal immunization to protect infants and active immunization of older adults (≥60 years) and 18–59-year-old individuals with high-risk conditions for prevention of RSV disease. Methods: Nonclinical safety studies, including a repeat-dose toxicity (RDT) study in rats and a combined developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) study in rabbits, were conducted to support early clinical development. Study designs and parameters evaluated in these studies were consistent with principles and practices as outlined in relevant regulatory guidelines. RSVpreF bivalent vaccine, with or without Al(OH)₃, was administered intramuscularly (IM) at 2× the human dose to animals in both studies. Results: Locally tolerated, reversible, inflammatory responses at the injection sites and the draining lymph nodes were observed as typical findings following vaccination. No effect of RSVpreF, with or without Al(OH)₃, was observed on female fertility or on embryo–fetal or postnatal survival, growth, or development in the DART study. In both studies, robust immune responses to both RSV A and B antigens were observed, especially with the Al(OH)₃ formulation. Conclusions: RSVpreF was well-tolerated both locally and systemically without any adverse effects on reproductive and developmental endpoints. Full article

Background/Objectives: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of respiratory infections, particularly affecting young infants, older adults, and individuals with comorbidities. Methods: This document, developed as a consensus by an international group of experts affiliated with the World Association of Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAidid), focuses on recent advancements in RSV prevention, highlighting the introduction of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and vaccines. Results: Historically, RSV treatment options were limited to supportive care and the monoclonal antibody palivizumab, which required multiple doses. Recent innovations have led to the development of long-acting mAbs, such as nirsevimab, which provide season-long protection with a single dose. Nirsevimab has shown high efficacy in preventing severe RSV-related lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in infants, reducing hospitalizations and ICU admissions. Additionally, new vaccines, such as RSVpreF and RSVpreF3, target older adults and have demonstrated significant efficacy in preventing LRTIs in clinical trials. Maternal vaccination strategies also show promise in providing passive immunity to newborns, protecting them during the most vulnerable early months of life. This document further discusses the global burden of RSV, its economic impact, and the challenges of implementing these preventative strategies in different healthcare settings. Conclusions: The evidence supports the integration of both passive (mAbs) and active (vaccines) immunization approaches as effective tools to mitigate the public health impact of RSV. The combined use of these interventions could substantially reduce RSV-related morbidity and mortality across various age groups and populations, emphasizing the importance of widespread immunization efforts. Full article

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the health benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of vaccination with bivalent respiratory syncytial virus stabilized prefusion F vaccine (RSVpreF) for the prevention of lower respiratory tract disease caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in Greek adults 60 years of age and older. Methods: A Markov model was adapted to simulate lifetime risk of health and economic outcomes from the public payer’s perspective over a lifetime horizon. Epidemiology, vaccine effectiveness, utilities, and direct medical costs (EUR, 2024) were obtained from published studies, official sources, and local experts. Model outcomes included the number of medically attended RSV cases, stratified by care setting (i.e., hospital, emergency department [ED], outpatient visits [OV]), and attributable RSV-related deaths, costs, life years (LY), quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of RSVpreF vaccination compared with no vaccination. Results: The model projected 258,170 hospitalizations, 112,248 ED encounters, 1,201,604 OV, and 25,463 deaths related to RSV in Greek older adults resulting in direct medical costs of EUR 1.6 billion over the lifetime horizon. Assuming RSV vaccination would reach the same coverage rates as pneumococcal and influenza programmes, 18,118 hospitalizations, 7874 ED encounters, 48,079 OV, and 1706 deaths could be prevented over the modelled time horizon. The health benefits associated with RSVpreF contributed to an incremental gain of 10,976 LYs and 7230 QALYs compared with no vaccination. The incremental analysis reported that vaccination with RSVpreF was estimated to be a cost-effective strategy resulting in ICERs of EUR 12,991 per LY gained, EUR 19,723 per QALY gained, and EUR 7870 per hospitalized RSV case avoided compared with no vaccination. Conclusions: Vaccination with RSVpreF was a cost-effective strategy for the prevention of RSV disease in Greek adults over 60 years of age. The introduction of RSV vaccination can improve public health by averting RSV cases and deaths and has the potential to fulfil an unmet medical need. Full article