Search Results (4)

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs), IoT-enabled sensing, and mobile platforms are increasingly used in precision agriculture, but fixed stations cannot fully capture within-field or canopy-level variability. This study developed and greenhouse-tested a low-cost modular tracked robot as a wireless environmental-sensing and telemetry research node for future crop-monitoring applications, rather than as a fully validated autonomous field robot. An open-source tracked chassis was extended with Raspberry Pi edge computing, a Cube Orange autopilot, RTK-capable GNSS, 5G/VPN/MAVLink communication, and BME280, BH1750, MLX90614, RGB camera, and LiDAR-ready sensing. The platform measured 35 × 25 × 40 cm, weighed 6.4 kg, operated from a 12 V supply, and provided about 4 h of runtime under favorable conditions. Sensor data were logged locally and could be transmitted remotely, while telemetry was visualized in QGroundControl. The environmental sensing layer was compared with a calibrated Libelium Smart Agriculture Pro station in a greenhouse using 70 synchronized samples per variable across three sessions. Because the two nodes were placed close to one another but were not strictly co-located, the comparison quantifies operational sensing differences under greenhouse microclimatic gradients rather than pure laboratory sensor error. Regression was retained only as a trend-tracking metric, while method-comparison interpretation was added using bias and Bland–Altman limits of agreement. The pressure channel showed strong trend tracking (R² = 0.992, RMSE = 0.024 hPa), whereas air temperature (R² = 0.756, RMSE = 2.537 °C) and relative humidity (R² = 0.817, RMSE = 5.024%) were suitable mainly for exploratory microclimate mapping and relative trend monitoring unless local calibration is applied. The title, claims and conclusions were therefore narrowed to greenhouse sensing-layer validation and future crop-monitoring deployment. Full article

Interest in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) has been increasingly growing in recent years, especially for purposes other than those for which they were initially used (civil and military purposes). Currently, in fact, they are used for advanced monitoring and control purposes, for 3D reconstructions of the territory and cultural heritage, and for freight transport. The problem in using these systems consists of the limited flight autonomy. In fact, commercially used drones, today, are sold with a set of batteries of limited duration which do not allow flights over large areas and, therefore, detailed surveys. The present work seeks to overcome these limitations by proposing an intelligent automatic charging system (Intelligent Charging Network) created using PC Engines Alix and an experimental drone prototype using a Raspberry Pi 3 and a Navio 2 module. At the same time, an efficient Intelligent Charging Network–drone communication system and a data transmission system are proposed, which allow images acquired by the drone to be transferred directly to the server used for data storage for their subsequent processing as well as the transmission of the flight plan from the QGroundControl application to the drone. The proposed system represents technological innovation in the field of drones with potential future developments linked to the implementation of sustainable drones. Full article

Flight testing in a realistic three-dimensional virtual environment is increasingly being considered a safe and cost-effective way of evaluating aircraft models and their control systems. The paper starts by reviewing and comparing the most popular personal computer-based flight simulators that have been successfully interfaced to date with the MathWorks software. This co-simulation approach allows combining the strengths of Matlab toolboxes for functions including navigation, control, and sensor modeling with the advanced simulation and scene rendering capabilities of dedicated flight simulation software. This approach can then be used to validate aircraft models, control algorithms, flight handling chatacteristics, or perform model identification from flight data. There is, however, a lack of sufficiently detailed step-by-step flight co-simulation tutorials, and there have also been few attempts to evaluate more than one flight co-simulation approach at a time. We, therefore, demonstrate our own step-by-step co-simulation implementations using Simulink with three different flight simulators: Xplane, FlightGear, and Alphalink’s virtual flight test environment (VFTE). All three co-simulations employ a real-time user datagram protocol (UDP) for data communication, and each approach has advantages depending on the aircraft type. In the case of a Cessna-172 general aviation aircraft, a Simulink co-simulation with Xplane demonstrates successful virtual flight tests with accurate simultaneous tracking of altitude and speed reference changes while maintaining roll stability under arbitrary wind conditions that present challenges in the single propeller Cessna. For a medium endurance Rascal-110 unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), Simulink is interfaced with FlightGear and with QGroundControl using the MAVlink protocol, which allows to accurately follow the lateral UAV path on a map, and this setup is used to evaluate the validity of Matlab-based six degrees of freedom UAV models. For a smaller ZOHD Nano Talon miniature aerial vehicle (MAV), Simulink is interfaced with the VFTE, which was specifically designed for this MAV, and with QGroundControl for the testing of advanced H-infinity observer-based autopilots using a software-in-the-loop (SIL) simulation to achieve robust low altitude flight under windy conditions. This is then finally extended to hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) implementation on the Nano Talon MAV using a controller area network (CAN) databus and a Pixhawk-4 mini autopilot with simulated sensor models. Full article

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAVs) have become very popular in the last decade due to some advantages such as strong terrain adaptation, low cost, zero casualties, and so on. One of the most interesting advances in this field is the automation of mission planning (task allocation) and real-time replanning, which are highly useful to increase the autonomy of the vehicle and reduce the operator workload. These automated mission planning and replanning systems require a Human Computer Interface (HCI) that facilitates the visualization and selection of plans that will be executed by the vehicles. In addition, most missions should be assessed before their real-life execution. This paper extends QGroundControl, an open-source simulation environment for flight control of multiple vehicles, by adding a mission designer that permits the operator to build complex missions with tasks and other scenario items; an interface for automated mission planning and replanning, which works as a test bed for different algorithms, and a Decision Support System (DSS) that helps the operator in the selection of the plan. In this work, a complete guide of these systems and some practical use cases are provided. Full article