Search Results (201)

This article examines how laïcité (secularism) discourse regarding the need for neutrality in sport acts as an enabler of racialised governance in contemporary France. I first provide a brief contextual discussion of Republican political culture as a ‘perpetual civilising mission’, which is founded on an abstract universalist framing of the concepts of equality and liberty. The article subsequently discusses how the mobilisation of what I call a ‘civilising secularism’ in contemporary France has shifted from a primary fixation on schools, universities and the workplace to sports and sporting practices, thus illustrating how its ‘civilising’ work is never done. However, in the face of sustained efforts to mobilise laïcité as a civilising concept, I also demonstrate how Muslim women are resisting secularist calls for ‘neutrality’ through collective action against their exclusion, notably via campaign groups such as Les Hijabeuses and Basket Pour Toutes. Furthermore, I argue that their resistance needs to be understood not only empirically but also conceptually. My analysis of these two collective campaigns therefore illustrates how they are actively contributing to a re-evaluation of Republican conceptions of equality and liberty. I draw on the work of Étienne Balibar regarding ‘equaliberty’ in order to analyse the campaigns of Les Hijabeuses and Basket Pour Toutes before proposing an extension to his concept that more fully reflects their activism. I propose the concept of ‘sororal equaliberty’ to capture this contribution. Full article

The United States has long been a destination for immigrants seeking better economic opportunities and an improved quality of life, and among these populations, Muslim women represent a particularly vulnerable group facing unique challenges. First-generation Muslim immigrant women in America navigate a complex web of intersecting stressors that significantly impact their mental health and overall wellbeing. Despite the pervasiveness of mental health and heightened attention on mental health challenges post COVID-19, research on the mental health of the Muslim community—particularly immigrant Muslim women in the United States—is seldom studied. This qualitative study utilized a focus group among a purposive sample of immigrant Muslim women to explore the multifaceted mental health challenges with particular attention to how racism, Islamophobia, and acculturative stress create cumulative mental health burdens. Thematic analysis revealed five major themes highlighting the various mental health challenges faced by participants: experience encountering racism and discrimination, the importance of faith and Islamic practice in addressing mental health challenges, the role of family and peers in addressing mental health challenges, and mental health service utilization. These findings underscore the importance of culturally responsive mental health services and community-based interventions that recognize the intersection of migration, discrimination, and religious identity in shaping the mental health experiences of immigrant Muslim women. Full article

Background: The World Health Organization recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life, with continued breastfeeding alongside complementary feeding up to two years or beyond. However, many mothers are unable to meet their breastfeeding expectations, resulting in a significant emotional impact shaped by social, cultural, and occupational factors. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore mothers’ perceptions and experiences of desired but unattained breastfeeding, with particular attention to its cultural–religious dimension. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study within an interpretivist paradigm was conducted between September 2024 and February 2025. Thirty women (15 Christian and 15 Muslim) receiving care from a primary care midwife in a Spanish city in North Africa participated. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using inductive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke’s approach. Results: Four main themes were identified: (1) emotional experiences and feelings, (2) reasons for breastfeeding discontinuation, (3) contextual and structural barriers, and (4) the influence of the social environment and support networks. Although both groups shared emotions such as guilt, frustration, and sadness, some differences were observed in how breastfeeding discontinuation was interpreted and experienced within this sample. Several Muslim participants expressed distress in relation to maternal identity and perceived maternal inadequacy, whereas several Christian participants more frequently emphasised contextual factors such as perceived lack of support or social pressure. Conclusions: The experience of desired but unattained breastfeeding is complex and may be shaped by cultural–religious context alongside individual, social, and structural factors. Integrating a transcultural approach into healthcare provision may improve emotional support and help reduce the burden of guilt and distress associated with breastfeeding discontinuation. Full article

Religion is increasingly recognized as important for coping and resilience in contexts of forced migration, yet broad categories such as “religious coping” do not fully explain how specific Islamic concepts become experientially available and action-guiding in everyday life. This article examines sabr among Syrian refugee women living in Turkey as a situated moral–religious concept rather than a simple equivalent of “patience.” The analysis draws on 24 semi-structured interviews conducted in Hatay, Turkey, between 2017 and 2023 and uses reflexive thematic analysis informed by research on situated abstract concepts and cultural model theory. Across the interviews, sabr emerged as a core Islamic idiom through which women made hardship intelligible and organized accounts of endurance, restraint, dignity, and action under prolonged uncertainty. Sabr was described as learned through religious practice and prior adversity, enacted through emotional, bodily, and verbal restraint, sustained through Qur’anic language and exemplary narratives, and closely linked to motherhood, social responsibility, trust in God, and expectations of eventual relief or divine reward. Rather than presenting sabr as a discrete coping strategy or psychological mechanism, the findings show how it organized women’s accounts of endurance, responsibility, and action within a broader religious–moral framework. An emic understanding of resilience among Muslim refugees therefore requires attention to lived concepts through which suffering becomes meaningful, morally framed, and practically bearable. Full article

For over a century, the South African secular state refused to legally recognise Islamic marriages (nikah), primarily due to their potentially polygynous nature. This statutory exclusion left Muslim women without civil legal protections during marriage, upon divorce, and at the death of a spouse. This article examines the fifteen-year strategic litigation campaign led by the Women’s Legal Centre (WLCT), which culminated in the landmark 2022 Constitutional Court judgment. Utilising a qualitative analysis of public court filings, legal pleadings, and judicial decisions, the author explores how marginalised Muslim women used civil courts to bypass and challenge the exclusive authority of conservative male clerical councils (ulama). The article analyses this legal trajectory through two primary theoretical lenses: Robert Cover’s concept of jurispathy (the state’s suppression of a community’s laws) and Afro-feminist frameworks. The findings reveal a critical tension in state-led legal reform. While the 2022 judgment secured vital financial and proprietary protections for women, it simultaneously introduced the limitations of ‘state feminism’ by replacing informal religious control with a rigid state bureaucracy. The paper argues that developing an authentic decolonial family law requires a jurisprudence that enforces the material and financial rights of African Muslim women without forcing their religious unions to conform entirely to Western, secular concepts of civil marriage. Full article

Developing critical thinking is a central aim of contemporary higher education, yet conventional instructional approaches often underuse authentic, real-world materials that stimulate higher-order reasoning and reflective judgment. The study examines the effectiveness of case-based socio-legal pedagogy in fostering critical thinking within contexts of legal pluralism and social complexity. A quasi-experimental mixed-methods pre–post design was conducted with 62 undergraduate students enrolled in a course on Islamic law and society. Over a four-week intervention, students engaged with six socio-legal cases drawn from Muslim women’s legal experiences in Israel, focusing on divorce, maintenance (nafaka), and child custody. Quantitative data were collected using a validated Critical Thinking Rubric assessing argumentation, evaluation of multiple perspectives, and legal reasoning. Results showed significant improvement in overall critical thinking, with gains across all measured dimensions. Qualitative analysis of written assignments and student reflections revealed greater recognition of legal ambiguity, more structured and evidence-based argumentation, and deeper engagement with competing normative and social frameworks. Overall, the findings highlight the pedagogical value of integrating socio-legal complexity into case-based learning as an adaptable model for strengthening critical thinking across disciplines involving interpretive, contested, and context-dependent knowledge in higher education and other fields requiring careful judgment under conditions of uncertainty and change. Full article

This article examines how young Muslim women in contemporary France live, negotiate, and recalibrate the hijab within a differentiated secular order that distributes the conditions of public visibility unequally across institutional sites. Rather than treating the headscarf as a legal controversy or as a symbolic test of the compatibility of Islam with republican secularism, the analysis asks how visible Muslim femininity is rendered institutionally legible, conditionally tolerable, or professionally problematic across the ordinary spaces of school, work, leisure, and public life, and how women respond when the continuity between faith, body, and public presence is repeatedly subjected to regulation. Drawing on a reflexive thematic analysis of seven in-depth interviews with young Muslim-background women in Paris, the article shows that hijab emerges in the core narratives as an ethical form of composure, governed self-presence, and dignity; that schools, workplaces, and recreational sites act as visibility filters that classify which forms of Muslim femininity can appear as acceptable, neutral, and professionally credible; and that these pressures are negotiated aesthetically through ongoing acts of bodily calibration and respectable self-presentation. To capture this practical labor, the article develops the concept of embodied boundary-work and situates it explicitly in dialogue with Foucauldian accounts of disciplinary normalization and feminist scholarship on the ambivalence of agency under norm-governed conditions. The argument is that the French hijab question is most productively understood through the gendered management of Muslim visibility enacted through institutional norms of fit, neutrality, and appearance, whereby the female body becomes the site where secular governance, moral selfhood, professional sorting, and public belonging concretely intersect. Full article

The Abortion & Religion study has collected over 200 personal narratives of Jewish, Christian, and Muslim women having abortions in the United States in the midst of an increasingly hostile and stigmatizing sociopolitical climate. Rooted in feminist theoretical claims about the epistemological value of situated knowledge, the Abortion & Religion study seeks to center the voices and experiences of people having abortions as a corrective to dominant negative attitudes about abortion in US cultural spaces. In this paper, three of the principal investigators engage in a methodological analysis of the study design using Tone Stangland Kaufman’s five categories of reflexivity to demonstrate how our epistemic insight as researchers who have also had abortions is a critical aspect of the epistemological insight that is foundational to the Abortion & Religion study. Since one of the goals of the study is to address the fictive “abortion imaginary” that shapes how people in the US think and talk about abortion, this methodological discussion of the study’s design demonstrates the epistemological value of centering the experiences of people who have had abortions as a corrective to the abstract, disembodied knowledge that shapes the epistemic injustice of the abortion imaginary. Full article

This paper examines transformations of Islam in Europe through the lens of the feminisation of religion, drawing on evidence from an Italian context. It asks whether this category—traditionally applied to Christian contexts—can also illuminate gender dynamics within Muslim institutions. Focusing on those Italian mosques where generational change is underway, sustained by the active involvement of second-generation Muslims, it shows that generational change has been accompanied by both a quantitative and a qualitative feminisation: women now outnumber men in several of the associations studied and increasingly occupy public and leadership roles, while also contesting double standards and reinterpreting their participation through religious knowledge and piety. These developments express greater female autonomy and authority, challenging stereotypes of Muslim women’s subordination and echoing aims traditionally associated with secular feminist discourse. Yet, as in the historical Christian case, such transformations unfold within a religious framework, advancing women’s roles through faith-based reinterpretations rather than secular claims to emancipation. These developments point to a form of “feminisation without feminism,” a formulation that signals a theoretical stance: these transformations cannot be fully grasped through secular paradigms of emancipation alone but require attention to the ongoing interplay between religious and secular logics in shaping female agency. The article thus contributes to understanding the plurality of modernities and the post-secular reconfigurations of gender and religion in contemporary Europe. Full article

The Belgian constitution establishes that communities shall dispense neutral teaching that also respects both religious convictions and non-denominational philosophical choices. The application of this article has led to several conflicts with the religiosity of parents and students, among which one stands out eminently: the prohibition of the Islamic headscarf in schools in Flanders and Wallonia. It is precisely in the first of these communities, Flanders, where the collisions between the principle of neutrality and the religious freedom of Muslim women who intend to continue wearing this religious symbol continue to be reproduced, not only for reasons of religiosity, but also of identity. Signally, one of the main problems lies in the difficulties in delimiting the extension of the concept of neutrality as a limit to religious freedom, a task in which there does not seem to be agreement, neither among the main agents of the education system nor even among the courts of justice of the community. The best proof of this are the last two developments in the matter, the European Court of Human Right judgment in the Mykias case and the unsuccessful attempt to ban the Islamic veil in the province of Flanders. Full article

This study investigates how women at a Muslim island community-based tourism (CBT) site convert performed respectability and routine paperwork into everyday organizational authority. Drawing on four months of ethnographic fieldwork in Bang Rong, Phuket—supported by seventeen semi-structured interviews, three years of social-media observation (2023–2025), and analysis of rosters, ledgers, receipts, and LINE threads—the study examines how gendered norms and material devices structure authority in daily tourism practice. The analysis identifies an authorization stack (veil, uniform, tone) and a set of paperwork devices (ledgers, rosters, receipts, digital groups) that make women’s visibility both morally credible and institutionally legible. Using a poststructural feminist lens and Barriteau’s gender-system framework, the article develops an interpretive, case-derived Respectability-in-Action Conversion Model, showing that moral credit converts into procedural authority only when respectability cues align with control of at least one device. Conversion, however, remains partial and contingent: strategic levers stay largely male or mosque-adjacent unless women obtain rights-bearing tools, such as co-signature authority, petty-cash control, or platform access, along with institutional protection against sanction. Age, class, and endorsement shape these trajectories, enabling some women to consolidate authority while rendering others easily replaceable. The study contributes: (1) a case-specific, empirically grounded account of authority formation in island CBT; (2) an analytic lens for understanding how performance, devices, and rights interact in this setting; and (3) practice-oriented implications for small-island CBT contexts that emphasize shared device access, rotating administrative duties, co-signature and budget rights, and safeguards against organizational capture. Full article

Background: Emergency contraception (EC), also known as postcoital contraception, is a method used to prevent an unintended pregnancy following unprotected or inadequately protected sexual intercourse. The available options include emergency contraceptive pills or the insertion of an intrauterine device (IUD). Emergency contraception pills contain either levonorgestrel (a single 1.5 mg dose, effective within 72 h) or ulipristal acetate (a single 30 mg dose, effective within 120 h), both of which are most effective when taken as soon as possible after unprotected intercourse. Another highly effective option is the insertion of a copper or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device, although IUDs are not registered for EC use in all countries. The aims of this cross-sectional, comparative, observational study were to collect data on the emergency contraception methods used by adolescent girls and young women to examine their association with various factors, such as religious beliefs, and to evaluate the effectiveness of different emergency contraception methods, including hormonal options and intrauterine devices. Methods: Data were collected from 240 women who attended our Family Planning Clinic using a structured questionnaire that included items on their demographic characteristics, religious beliefs, medical history, lifestyle factors, contraceptive use and side effects, prior use of emergency contraception, method selected, and reasons for seeking emergency contraception. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, comparisons between religious groups were conducted using chi-square tests, and factors related to the timing of emergency contraceptive use were investigated using multinomial logistic regression analysis. Results: Most of the reasons for emergency contraception use did not differ significantly between Christian and Muslim participants. However, Christians were significantly more likely to use emergency contraception due to missed contraceptive doses (20.9% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.004) or the failure to take a progesterone-only pill (19.1% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.001). Levonorgestrel was the most frequently used method in both groups (48.9% of Christians vs. 60% of Muslims, p = 0.132), followed by ulipristal acetate (30.9% vs. 40%, p = 0.180). Notably, 18.5% of Christian participants used an intrauterine device (IUD) for emergency contraception, while no Muslim participants reported IUD use (p < 0.001), indicating a significant difference potentially influenced by cultural or religious factors. Conclusions: Both religious and individual sociodemographic factors affect not only the choice of emergency contraception but also the urgency with which the emergency contraception is used. Interventions aimed at improving contraception education, addressing partner-related challenges, and promoting timely access could improve reproductive health outcomes. Full article

This article explores the Rausyan Fikr Institute as a distinctive intellectual and philosophical movement within Indonesia’s Shia Muslim community, focusing on its role in mobilizing dissent narratives and fostering intellectual activism. Within the broader historical trajectory of Shi’ism in Indonesia—from its early cultural impact and political mobilization during the Iranian Revolution to its institutional development in the Reformasi era —the Rausyan Fikr Institute represents a unique approach to implementing Shia philosophical thought through grassroots mobilization. Using the framework of ideologically structured action (ISA), this article highlights how Rausyan Fikr articulates its identity through the transmission of philosophical frameworks, critical discourse on current social-political issues, and inclusive educational initiatives. It explores three elements: (i) the dissemination of Shia Islam-inspired thought through translation, publishing, and education, (ii) the development of dissent narratives on capitalism, feminism, and dominant political structure, and (iii) the engagement with wider communities and mobilization strategies for its members, which involve students, women, and families alike in establishing space for intellectual development. The article concludes by reflecting on the Rausyan Fikr Institute’s resilience in sustaining philosophical activism under sectarian pressures, its contribution to Indonesia’s broader intellectual and religious discourse, and the challenges it encounters in preserving both ideological identity and relevance in a contested socio-political landscape. Full article

Background: Musculoskeletal pain (MSP) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide and is frequently reported during the Muslim Hajj Pilgrimage; however, its prevalence and associated risk factors among Kuwaiti pilgrims have not been studied thus far. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of Kuwaiti pilgrims conducted during the year 2024. Pilgrims were contacted by phone before and after Hajj to answer a survey regarding MSP during their pilgrimage. Risk ratios were computed using binomial generalised linear models with a log link. Results: A total of 557 participants (Mean BMI 28.0 ± 8.0 kg/m²), comprising 340 women (61%) and 217 men (39%), participated in the study. Most were between 33 and 45 years of age (n = 173, 31%), with 24% of the sample (n = 136) reporting MSP. Our regression analysis revealed that female gender (aRR 1.49, 95% CI 1.08–2.06), short sleep duration (<6 h; aRR 1.37, 95% CI 1.02–1.84), and smoking (aRR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46–0.95) were significantly associated with MSP, while participants who did not report hypertension were also less likely to report MSP (aRR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46–0.89). Conclusions: This study, the first to focus on Kuwaiti pilgrims in this regard, showed that their reported prevalence of MSP during Hajj was lower than reported previously in studies of other nationalities. Several factors that increased the risk of MSP included smoking, hypertension, poor sleep, and female gender. The results of this study emphasise the necessity of both conducting a screening programme before Hajj and raising awareness of the factors that increase the prevalence of MSP, subsequently reducing the readiness of pilgrims. Full article

This study examined the associations between perceived Islamophobia and social well-being among Muslim women living in Italy, focusing on the potential mediating role of societal mattering and interpersonal mattering with respect to family and friends. Drawing from community and social psychology perspectives, we hypothesized that perceived Islamophobia would be negatively associated with social well-being, and that this relationship would be mediated by perceived mattering. In total, 120 Muslim women completed validated measures of perceived Islamophobia, mattering, and social well-being. Generalized Linear Modeling indicated that the direct association between perceived Islamophobia and social well-being was marginally significant. However, significant indirect associations emerged through societal mattering and mattering to friends. Higher perceived Islamophobia was associated with lower societal mattering and mattering to friends, which in turn were positively associated with social well-being, whereas mattering to family did not mediate the association. These findings underscore the role of different forms of mattering in shaping social well-being among women belonging to a minority religious group. Results have implications for the development of interventions aimed at promoting perception of being important to one’s society and significant others among Muslim women, particularly in national contexts where anti-Muslim sentiments may threaten their well-being. Full article