Religious Institutions in the Mediterranean: A Comparative Perspective

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Health/Psychology/Social Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2025) | Viewed by 6639

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Political and International Sciences – DiSPI, University of Genoa, 16126 Genova, GE, Italy
Interests: law and religion; sacred art and heritage preservation; interreligious dialogue and peace-building; regulation of religious worship; migration and religion; religious rights and legal systems; socio-legal studies of religion
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent years, the history of relations between the two shores of the Mediterranean has been enriched by the study of a series of phenomena that have made comparison a tool for investigating the forms in which the conflicts and convergences between the political, social, and cultural systems that developed in the countries bordering the Mare Nostrum and, following the Spanish imperial system, in the countries of the New World, manifested themselves. This Special Issue is part of this line of research, which focuses on the events, dynamics, and forms of religious expression in the contemporary period, allowing us to identify the changes that have taken place both at the cultural level and at the level of the institutions responsible for managing interreligious relations. Through comparative analysis, the relevant literature is as follows: E. G. López, M. Ciravegna, P. Valenti, G, Maestri, R. Villares, J. Casanova, J.-Martínez Torrón, F. J. Figueroa, R, Grosfoguel, M. J. Ruiz-Rico, A. Ruiz Miguel, M. Cuenva Cabeza, A. González García, J. M. Castillo, E. Infante, S. Muñoz Macho, A. García Yuste, J. L. Rodíiguez-Jiménez, D. Milani, A. Negri, R. Benato, A. Bozzetti, M. P. Marín, E. Loncón, F. J. Huenchumil, M. E. Valenzuela, O. de la Fuente, R. Lira, A. M. Stuven, and F. Pairican. Comparative studies of religious institutions in the area of interest are important for several reasons, ranging from strengthening our cultural and political understanding to formulating more inclusive social policies and legal systems. Analyzing similarities and differences can provide important insights for resolving conflicts, fostering social cohesion, activating best practices, as well as developing models for managing religious plurality more effectively.

This Special Issue aims to analyze the religious phenomenon in law through the models of comparison and relationship between religions, culture, and legal systems in the Euro-Mediterranean area and, following the Spanish imperial system, in the countries of the New World, with particular reference to specific problem areas concerning the following: conscientious objection in health and sports, systems of government in the management of multi-religious societies, the teaching of religion in public schools, the fight against fundamentalism, and the role of law and ethics in the indigenous worldview. In this regard, the focus of this Special Issue will be on the public space of comparison between Italian, Spanish, and Chilean cultures, delving into analogies and antinomies concerning the religious institutions examined and casting a glance at the meaning of the law of religions, the main sources of religious rights, and the relative methodologies of study.

The objectives of this Special Issue are as follows: (1) the study of the religious phenomenon both in its inter-ornamental dimension and in its dimension at the institutional level in order to deepen the theme of the sacralization of politics and the nationalization of religion in secular legal systems from a comparative perspective; and (2) the critical in-depth study of the relationship between religions, culture, and law in the Mediterranean area and in the New World, with particular reference to specific common institutions in order to identify, through a comparative analysis on a historical–legal basis, the analogies, differences, problematic aspects, and methods of development.

The impact of this Special Issue in interdisciplinary scientific terms will be that of the understanding, development, and strengthening of research strands inherent to the dynamics between the religious factor and political communities and the manifestation of the religious phenomenon in law through the models of comparison and relations between religions, cultures, and legal systems in the geographical area of interest.

This Special Issue fits fully into the journal's thematic areas, and will effectively complement the existing literature.

In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome. Research areas may include (but not limited to) the following:

  • Understanding religious and cultural plurality.
  • Study of the relationship between the state legal system and religious factors.
  • Managing religious plurality and civil rights.
  • Ethical and social perspectives on religious institutions.
  • Reflections on possible policies and strategies for inclusion and integration.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 200–250 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the Guest Editor, Dr. Daniela Tarantino (Daniela.Tarantino@unige.it) and CC the Special Issue Editor, Ms. Joyce Xi (joyce.xi@mdpi.com). Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editor for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the special issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer review.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Daniela Tarantino
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • religious institutions
  • law
  • society
  • Mediterranean
  • New World

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

25 pages, 339 KB  
Article
Religious Freedom and Neutrality in Belgian Education: About the Ban on Islamic Headscarves in Flanders
by Rafael Valencia Candalija
Religions 2026, 17(1), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17010082 - 11 Jan 2026
Viewed by 973
Abstract
The Belgian constitution establishes that communities shall dispense neutral teaching that also respects both religious convictions and non-denominational philosophical choices. The application of this article has led to several conflicts with the religiosity of parents and students, among which one stands out eminently: [...] Read more.
The Belgian constitution establishes that communities shall dispense neutral teaching that also respects both religious convictions and non-denominational philosophical choices. The application of this article has led to several conflicts with the religiosity of parents and students, among which one stands out eminently: the prohibition of the Islamic headscarf in schools in Flanders and Wallonia. It is precisely in the first of these communities, Flanders, where the collisions between the principle of neutrality and the religious freedom of Muslim women who intend to continue wearing this religious symbol continue to be reproduced, not only for reasons of religiosity, but also of identity. Signally, one of the main problems lies in the difficulties in delimiting the extension of the concept of neutrality as a limit to religious freedom, a task in which there does not seem to be agreement, neither among the main agents of the education system nor even among the courts of justice of the community. The best proof of this are the last two developments in the matter, the European Court of Human Right judgment in the Mykias case and the unsuccessful attempt to ban the Islamic veil in the province of Flanders. Full article
21 pages, 306 KB  
Article
Governance Systems in the Management of Multireligious Societies: The Spanish Model
by Jaime Rossell
Religions 2026, 17(1), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17010034 - 29 Dec 2025
Viewed by 602
Abstract
This article addresses the need to rethink models for managing religious diversity in Europe, which, among other causes, has transformed into a multi-religious society, breaking with Christian hegemony as a result of the migration processes of the last century. The author proposes governance [...] Read more.
This article addresses the need to rethink models for managing religious diversity in Europe, which, among other causes, has transformed into a multi-religious society, breaking with Christian hegemony as a result of the migration processes of the last century. The author proposes governance as an essential tool for managing religious diversity, understood as a style of government that promotes interaction and cooperation between the State and non-state actors, including religious denominations, in decision-making processes to regulate this phenomenon and enable individuals and the groups they belong to, to exercise their fundamental right to religious freedom. This approach seeks the social inclusion and effective participation of religious minorities to combat their marginalization and radicalization. To this end, we propose moving away from laicism positions that seek to exclude religion from the public sphere or from those that defend the political use of religion as an element of national identity, proposing instead a model of positive secularism like the Spanish one. Analysing the Spanish model, the article argues how the political participation of religious minorities through a model of religious governance in the management of religious diversity is crucial for building inclusive and safe societies where social cohesion and the full observance of religious freedom and other fundamental rights are achieved. Full article
20 pages, 300 KB  
Article
Informed Consent vs. Refusal of Treatment from a Legal Perspective: Spain and the Case of Adult Jehovah’s Witnesses
by Mar Leal-Adorna
Religions 2026, 17(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17010007 - 20 Dec 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2500
Abstract
The principal objective of this paper is to analyse the treatment that Spanish law gives to the refusal to receive blood transfusions on religious grounds, with special reference to the case of Jehovah’s Witnesses. The aim is to determine how different fundamental rights [...] Read more.
The principal objective of this paper is to analyse the treatment that Spanish law gives to the refusal to receive blood transfusions on religious grounds, with special reference to the case of Jehovah’s Witnesses. The aim is to determine how different fundamental rights are reconciled with other constitutionally protected legal rights. To this end, the position of patient autonomy, informed consent, the right to refuse treatment, and advance directives will be examined. Following this analysis, there are suggestions which aim to achieve an appropriate balance between these conflicting rights. In summary, this study seeks to establish a framework of legal and ethical protection for cases when patient autonomy and the duty to protect life come into conflict. Full article
19 pages, 338 KB  
Article
Structural Violence and Religious Freedom: Towards a Legal Principle of Structural Justice in the Chilean Experience
by Alessia Baghino
Religions 2025, 16(12), 1566; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16121566 - 12 Dec 2025
Viewed by 817
Abstract
Recent Chilean jurisprudence on Indigenous religious freedom has revealed a profound dissonance between the legal categories applied by the courts and the spiritual conceptions of Indigenous peoples. This gap between formal recognition and the effective protection of sacred sites generates a form of [...] Read more.
Recent Chilean jurisprudence on Indigenous religious freedom has revealed a profound dissonance between the legal categories applied by the courts and the spiritual conceptions of Indigenous peoples. This gap between formal recognition and the effective protection of sacred sites generates a form of structural violence, understood as the institutional reproduction of inequality under the guise of neutrality. This study proposes to reformulate the notion of structural violence as an operative legal principle capable of activating heightened judicial scrutiny. Through a qualitative approach, it develops a doctrinal and jurisprudential analysis aimed at identifying normative patterns of exclusion and assessing the hermeneutic, normative, and diagnostic functions of the proposed principle. The results show that Chilean law, by translating spiritual practices into liberal categories of property or procedure, neutralizes their religious content and perpetuates relations of subordination. The study concludes that incorporating the principle prohibiting structural violence enables the reinterpretation of legal norms and the correction of historical asymmetries, orienting the law toward a form of structural justice sensitive to the ontological, cultural, and spiritual plurality of Indigenous peoples. Full article
16 pages, 305 KB  
Article
Religion in State Schools: Questioning, Rationale and Challenges in Spanish Law
by Zoila Combalía
Religions 2025, 16(12), 1489; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16121489 - 25 Nov 2025
Viewed by 1164
Abstract
In recent decades, Spain has witnessed a social and political debate regarding the justification and/or appropriateness of religious education in state schools. In this paper, after providing a brief description of the current situation, I will refer to the doubts and questions that [...] Read more.
In recent decades, Spain has witnessed a social and political debate regarding the justification and/or appropriateness of religious education in state schools. In this paper, after providing a brief description of the current situation, I will refer to the doubts and questions that have been raised about this area of teaching, as well as its legal basis and the social function it can perform. Finally, I will address some of the aspects or difficulties involved in its provision. Full article
Back to TopTop