Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Iowa River Basin

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
27 pages, 7434 KiB  
Article
Baseflow Index Trends in Iowa Rivers and the Relationships to Other Hydrologic Metrics
by Elliot S. Anderson and Keith E. Schilling
Hydrology 2025, 12(5), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology12050116 - 10 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 838
Abstract
The US state of Iowa has experienced profound historical changes in its streamflow and baseflow. While several studies have noted increasing baseflow and baseflow index (BFI) values throughout the 20th century, analyses quantifying BFI trends in recent years or exploring spatial differences in [...] Read more.
The US state of Iowa has experienced profound historical changes in its streamflow and baseflow. While several studies have noted increasing baseflow and baseflow index (BFI) values throughout the 20th century, analyses quantifying BFI trends in recent years or exploring spatial differences in watersheds marked by varying land use and geologic properties have not been conducted. This study calculated annual values for BFI (and several other hydrologic metrics) using flow records from 42 Iowa stream gauges containing at least 50 years of uninterrupted measurements. While BFI overwhelmingly rose throughout the mid-1900s, circa 1990 it began to level off. In some areas of Iowa (e.g., the southwest), BFI has continued to rise over the past 30 years—albeit at a slower rate; in other regions, it has become stationary or declined. One site failed to follow this trend (Walnut Cr), the only basin to experience large-scale urbanization. Furthermore, BFI demonstrated a strong negative correlation to streamflow flashiness, indicating that rising baseflow has also made Iowa streams less dynamic. BFI was largely independent of overall streamflow. These results may suggest the increased influence of conservation practices and the diminishing impacts of tile drainage on the delivery of water to Iowa’s rivers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hydrological Processes in Agricultural Watersheds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 42266 KiB  
Article
An Approach for Prioritizing Natural Infrastructure Practices to Mitigate Flood and Nitrate Risks in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin
by Keith E. Schilling, Jerry Mount, Kelly M. Suttles, Eileen L. McLellan, Phillip W. Gassman, Michael J. White and Jeffrey G. Arnold
Land 2023, 12(2), 276; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020276 - 18 Jan 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4499
Abstract
Risks from flooding and poor water quality are evident at a range of spatial scales and climate change will exacerbate these risks in the future. Natural infrastructure (NI), consisting of structural or perennial vegetation, measures that provide multiple ecosystem benefits have the potential [...] Read more.
Risks from flooding and poor water quality are evident at a range of spatial scales and climate change will exacerbate these risks in the future. Natural infrastructure (NI), consisting of structural or perennial vegetation, measures that provide multiple ecosystem benefits have the potential to reduce flood and water quality risks. In this study, we intersected watershed-scale risks to flooding and nitrate export in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin (MARB) of the central U.S. with potential locations of seven NI practices (row crop conversion, water, and sediment control basins, depressional wetlands, nitrate-removal wetlands, riparian buffers, and floodplain levees and row crop change) to prioritize where NI can be most effective for combined risk reduction at watershed scales. Spatial data from a variety of publicly-available databases were analyzed at a 10 m grid cell to locate NI practices using a geographic information system (GIS). NI practices were presented at the regional basin scale and local Iowa-Cedar watershed in eastern Iowa to show individual practice locations. A prioritization scheme was developed to show the optimal watersheds for deploying NI practices to minimize flooding and water quality risks in the MARB. Among the 84 HUC4 basins in the MARB, 28 are located in the Upper Mississippi and Ohio Rivers basins. The Wabash and Iowa-Cedar basins (HUCs 0512 and 0708, respectively) within these basins were found to rank among the uppermost quintile for nearly all practices evaluated, indicating widespread opportunities for NI implementation. Study results are a launching point from which to improve the connections between watershed scale risks and the potential use of NI practices to reduce these risks. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2360 KiB  
Article
Effects of Weather on Iowa Nitrogen Export Estimated by Simulation-Based Decomposition
by Vishal Raul, Yen-Chen Liu, Leifur Leifsson and Amy Kaleita
Sustainability 2022, 14(3), 1060; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031060 - 18 Jan 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1767
Abstract
The state of Iowa is known for its high-yield agriculture, supporting rising demands for food and fuel production. But this productivity is also a significant contributor of nitrogen loading to the Mississippi River basin causing the hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico. [...] Read more.
The state of Iowa is known for its high-yield agriculture, supporting rising demands for food and fuel production. But this productivity is also a significant contributor of nitrogen loading to the Mississippi River basin causing the hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico. The delivery of nutrients, especially nitrogen, from the upper Mississippi River basin, is a function, not only of agricultural activity, but also of hydrology. Thus, it is important to consider extreme weather conditions, such as drought and flooding, and understand the effects of weather variability on Iowa’s food-energy-water (IFEW) system and nitrogen loading to the Mississippi River from Iowa. In this work, the simulation decomposition approach is implemented using the extended IFEW model with a crop-weather model to better understand the cause-and-effect relationships of weather parameters on the nitrogen export from the state of Iowa. July temperature and precipitation are used as varying input weather parameters with normal and log normal distributions, respectively, and subdivided to generate regular and dry weather conditions. It is observed that most variation in the soil nitrogen surplus lies in the regular condition, while the dry condition produces the highest soil nitrogen surplus for the state of Iowa. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 887 KiB  
Article
Drainage N Loads Under Climate Change with Winter Rye Cover Crop in a Northern Mississippi River Basin Corn-Soybean Rotation
by Robert Malone, Jurgen Garbrecht, Phillip Busteed, Jerry Hatfield, Dennis Todey, Jade Gerlitz, Quanxiao Fang, Matthew Sima, Anna Radke, Liwang Ma, Zhiming Qi, Huaiqing Wu, Dan Jaynes and Thomas Kaspar
Sustainability 2020, 12(18), 7630; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187630 - 16 Sep 2020
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3660
Abstract
To help reduce future N loads entering the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River 45%, Iowa set the goal of reducing non-point source N loads 41%. Studies show that implementing winter rye cover crops into agricultural systems reduces N loads from subsurface [...] Read more.
To help reduce future N loads entering the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River 45%, Iowa set the goal of reducing non-point source N loads 41%. Studies show that implementing winter rye cover crops into agricultural systems reduces N loads from subsurface drainage, but its effectiveness in the Mississippi River Basin under expected climate change is uncertain. We used the field-tested Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM) to estimate drainage N loads, crop yield, and rye growth in central Iowa corn-soybean rotations. RZWQM scenarios included baseline (BL) observed weather (1991–2011) and ambient CO2 with cover crop and no cover crop treatments (BL_CC and BL_NCC). Scenarios also included projected future temperature and precipitation change (2065–2085) from six general circulation models (GCMs) and elevated CO2 with cover crop and no cover crop treatments (CC and NCC). Average annual drainage N loads under NCC, BL_NCC, CC and BL_CC were 63.6, 47.5, 17.0, and 18.9 kg N ha−1. Winter rye cover crop was more effective at reducing drainage N losses under climate change than under baseline conditions (73 and 60% for future and baseline climate), mostly because the projected temperatures and atmospheric CO2 resulted in greater rye growth and crop N uptake. Annual CC drainage N loads were reduced compared with BL_NCC more than the targeted 41% for 18 to 20 years of the 21-year simulation, depending on the GCM. Under projected climate change, average annual simulated crop yield differences between scenarios with and without winter rye were approximately 0.1 Mg ha−1. These results suggest that implementing winter rye cover crop in a corn-soybean rotation effectively addresses the goal of drainage N load reduction under climate change in a northern Mississippi River Basin agricultural system without affecting cash crop production. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3411 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Spatial Nitrate Patterns in An Eastern Iowa Watershed Using Boat-Deployed Sensors
by Matthew J. Meulemans, Christopher S. Jones, Keith E. Schilling, Nathan C. Young and Larry J. Weber
Water 2020, 12(1), 146; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010146 - 3 Jan 2020
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3270
Abstract
Water quality sensors deployed on boats, buoys, and fixed monitoring stations along rivers allow high frequency monitoring at dense spatial and temporal resolutions. Research characterizing nitrate (NO3–N) delivery along extended reaches of navigable rivers, however, is sparse. Since land use and [...] Read more.
Water quality sensors deployed on boats, buoys, and fixed monitoring stations along rivers allow high frequency monitoring at dense spatial and temporal resolutions. Research characterizing nitrate (NO3–N) delivery along extended reaches of navigable rivers, however, is sparse. Since land use and stream biogeochemistry can vary within agricultural watersheds, identifying detailed spatial patterns of stream NO3–N can help identify source area contributions that can be used to develop strategies for water quality improvement. Identifying spatial patterns is especially critical in agricultural watersheds that span multiple landscapes and have dynamic hydrological regimes. We developed and tested a new method that quantifies NO3–N delivery to streams at a high spatial resolution by continuously measuring stream NO3–N using a boat-deployed sensor. Traveling up the Iowa and Cedar Rivers (located within agricultural Upper Mississippi River Basin) and their major tributaries with the system, we automatically measured NO3–N concentrations every 15 s during four excursions spanning the months of May to August, 2018, and characterized stream NO3–N both laterally and longitudinally in river flow. Iowa River NO3–N concentrations were highest nearest the headwaters and gradually declined as the river flowed toward the Mississippi River. Conversely, Cedar River NO3–N concentrations increased from the headwaters toward the mid-watershed areas due to elevated NO3–N delivery from tributaries of the Middle Cedar River; NO3–N concentrations declined in the lower reaches. Our results confirm that NO3–N mitigation efforts should focus on level and intensely-farmed subwatersheds. Data collected with our sensor system compliments permanently deployed sensors and provides an option to support NO3–N removal efforts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Water Quality and Contamination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4277 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Changes in Flood Frequency Due to the Effects of Climate Change: Implications for Engineering Design
by Felipe Quintero, Ricardo Mantilla, Christopher Anderson, David Claman and Witold Krajewski
Hydrology 2018, 5(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology5010019 - 3 Mar 2018
Cited by 41 | Viewed by 8654
Abstract
The authors explore the uncertainty implied in the estimation of changes in flood frequency due to climate change at the basins of the Cedar River and Skunk River in Iowa, United States. The study focuses on the influence of climate change on the [...] Read more.
The authors explore the uncertainty implied in the estimation of changes in flood frequency due to climate change at the basins of the Cedar River and Skunk River in Iowa, United States. The study focuses on the influence of climate change on the 100-year flood, used broadly as a reference flow for civil engineering design. Downscaled rainfall projections between 1960–2099 were used as forcing into a hydrological model for producing discharge projections at locations intersecting vulnerable transportation infrastructure. The annual maxima of the discharge projections were used to conduct flood frequency analyses over the periods 1960–2009 and 1960–2099. The analysis of the period 1960–2009 is a good predictor of the observed flood values for return periods between 2 and 200 years in the studied basins. The findings show that projected flood values could increase significantly in both basins. Between 2009 and 2099, 100-year flood could increase between 47% and 52% in Cedar River, and between 25% and 34% in South Skunk River. The study supports a recommendation for assessing vulnerability of infrastructure to climate change, and implementation of better resiliency and hydraulic design practices. It is recommended that engineers update existing design standards to account for climate change by using the upper-limit confidence interval of the flood frequency analyses that are currently in place. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climatic Change Impact on Hydrology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 14177 KiB  
Article
Recent Afforestation in the Iowa River and Vorskla River Basins: A Comparative Trends Analysis
by Yury G. Chendev, Jason A. Hubbart, Edgar A. Terekhin, Anthony R. Lupo, Tom J. Sauer and C. Lee Burras
Forests 2016, 7(11), 278; https://doi.org/10.3390/f7110278 - 15 Nov 2016
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 6958
Abstract
Afforestation trends were compared between two continentally-distinct, yet similar ecoregions to characterize similarities or differences in forest advancement due to natural and anthropogenic forcings. Temporal changes in forest cover were analyzed using high resolution aerial and satellite photographs for Southeast Iowa, USA, and [...] Read more.
Afforestation trends were compared between two continentally-distinct, yet similar ecoregions to characterize similarities or differences in forest advancement due to natural and anthropogenic forcings. Temporal changes in forest cover were analyzed using high resolution aerial and satellite photographs for Southeast Iowa, USA, and satellite photographs for the western Belgorod Oblast, Russia. An increase in forested area was shown to occur over a 44-year period from 1970–2014 in Iowa where afforestation was reflected by the aggregation of smaller forest units. In the Belgorod region the opposite occurred in that there was an increase in the number of smaller forested units. The rate of forest expansion into open grassland areas, previously used as haying lands and pastures, was 14 m decade−1 and 8 m decade−1 in Iowa and the Belgorod Oblast, respectively. Based on current trends, predicted times for complete forest coverage in the study areas was estimated to be 80 years in Iowa and 300 years in the Belgorod Oblast. In both the Iowa and Belgorod Oblast, there was an increase in annual precipitation at the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st centuries, thus providing a contributing mechanism to forest advancement in the study regions and implications for future management practices. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 265 KiB  
Article
Evaluating Hydrologic Response of an Agricultural Watershed for Watershed Analysis
by Manoj Kumar Jha
Water 2011, 3(2), 604-617; https://doi.org/10.3390/w3020604 - 3 Jun 2011
Cited by 42 | Viewed by 9829
Abstract
This paper describes the hydrological assessment of an agricultural watershed in the Midwestern United States through the use of a watershed scale hydrologic model. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was applied to the Maquoketa River watershed, located in northeast Iowa, [...] Read more.
This paper describes the hydrological assessment of an agricultural watershed in the Midwestern United States through the use of a watershed scale hydrologic model. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was applied to the Maquoketa River watershed, located in northeast Iowa, draining an agriculture intensive area of about 5,000 km2. The inputs to the model were obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency’s geographic information/database system called Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources (BASINS). Meteorological input, including precipitation and temperature from six weather stations located in and around the watershed, and measured streamflow data at the watershed outlet, were used in the simulation. A sensitivity analysis was performed using an influence coefficient method to evaluate surface runoff and baseflow variations in response to changes in model input hydrologic parameters. The curve number, evaporation compensation factor, and soil available water capacity were found to be the most sensitive parameters among eight selected parameters. Model calibration, facilitated by the sensitivity analysis, was performed for the period 1988 through 1993, and validation was performed for 1982 through 1987. The model was found to explain at least 86% and 69% of the variability in the measured streamflow data for calibration and validation periods, respectively. This initial hydrologic assessment will facilitate future modeling applications using SWAT to the Maquoketa River watershed for various watershed analyses, including watershed assessment for water quality management, such as total maximum daily loads, impacts of land use and climate change, and impacts of alternate management practices. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop