Search Results (69)

Background/Objectives: Accurate determination of malignancy in pancreatic masses through endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is crucial for appropriate clinical management and prognostic assessment. However, the diagnostic sensitivity of conventional cytology using Papanicolaou (Pap) staining remains limited, often leading to inconclusive results. In this study, we investigated the diagnostic utility of methionyl-tRNA synthetase 1 (MARS1) through immunohistochemical (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) staining as a potential biomarker for pancreatic cancer. IHC analysis was conducted on resected tissue samples from 10 patients, including both pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and corresponding non-neoplastic pancreatic tissue. Additionally, cytologic samples were obtained from 198 patients with pancreatic masses who underwent EUS-FNA for diagnostic evaluation. Pap staining and MARS1 IF staining were performed on liquid-based cytology slides derived from EUS-FNA specimens. Results: MARS1 was detected by IHC staining in the 10 surgical specimens diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinomas. After Pap staining, 37 patients were excluded because of unsuitable specimens, leaving 161 patients who underwent both Pap and MARS1 IF staining. EUS-FNA specimens from the 151 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were classified by Pap staining as atypia (n = 36), suspicious for malignancy (n = 55), or malignancy (n = 60). MARS1 IF staining was positive in 147 of these patients and negative in 4. MARS1 IF staining distinguished pancreatic cancer in specimens with atypia on Pap staining. The sensitivity for detecting pancreatic cancer was significantly higher for MARS1 IF staining than for conventional Pap staining (97.4% vs. 79.1%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The high sensitivity of MARS1 IF staining improved malignancy detection in pancreatic masses. Further prospective studies are required to validate our findings. Full article

Background and Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (FNA/B) is widely used for solid pancreatic lesions; however, the optimal number of needle punctures required to achieve high diagnostic accuracy remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the ideal number of punctures required for solid pancreatic lesions using EUS-FNA/B. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 598 patients who underwent EUS-FNA/B for solid pancreatic lesions. We analyzed the cumulative tissue acquisition rates and diagnostic accuracy rates for cytology and histology, and identified the factors associated with diagnostic accuracy using univariate and multivariate analyses. Rapid on-site cytological evaluation was performed in all cases. Results: Cumulative tissue acquisition rates were 95.6% and 92.5% for cytology and histology, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy for cytology increased from 72.6% in the first puncture to 78.8% in the second puncture (p = 0.0233). In contrast, the diagnostic accuracy of histology increased from 72.0% at the first puncture to 83.2% at the third puncture (p = 0.0412). Statistically significant differences were noted between the first and second punctures for cytology, and between the first, second, and third punctures for histology. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with diagnostic accuracy. In cytology, sex was identified as a significant contributing factor, whereas no independent predictors were found in histology. Conclusions: These findings suggest that two-needle punctures are optimal for cytology, and three-needle punctures are optimal for the histological diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions using EUS-FNA/B. Full article

The intricate airway anatomy and poorly understood etiology of pediatric conditions render the diagnosis of mediastinal disorders particularly challenging. Traditional diagnostic methods, such as mediastinoscopy and thoracotomy, carry high risks and are often impractical in children. Endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) enables a minimally invasive, esophageal route to mediastinal lesions, providing a diagnostic approach that is new to pediatrics compared with conventional techniques. We review the technical characteristics, clinical benefits, and prospective role of EUS-B-FNA in pediatric diagnostic investigation. We also review the clinical applications of EUS-B-FNA to date and aim to promote its use as a novel adjunct for the evaluation of complex mediastinal pathology in pediatric medicine. Full article

Pancreatic cancer is a highly malignant digestive system tumor characterized by covert onset and rapid progression, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 10%. Most patients have already reached an advanced or metastatic stage at the time of diagnosis. Therefore, it is particularly important to study the occurrence, development, and drug resistance mechanisms of pancreatic cancer. In recent years, the development of 3D tumor cell culture technology has provided new avenues for pancreatic cancer research. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) are micro-organ structures that are obtained directly from the patient’s body and rapidly expand in vitro. PDOs have the ability to self-renew and self-organize and retain the genetic heterogeneity and molecular characteristics of the original tumor. However, the use of organoids is limited because most patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are inoperable. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) is an important method for obtaining tissue samples from non-surgical pancreatic cancer patients. This article reviews the factors that affect the formation of pancreatic cancer organoids using EUS-FNA/FNB. High-quality samples, sterile operations, and optimized culture media are key to successfully generating organoids. Additionally, individual patient differences and disease stages can impact the formation of organoids. Pancreatic cancer organoids constructed using EUS-FNA/FNB have significant potential, suggesting new approaches for research and treatment. Full article

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) represent a spectrum of non-neoplasms and neoplasms with varying malignant potential, posing significant challenges in diagnosis and management. While some PCLs are precursors to pancreatic cancer, others remain benign, necessitating accurate differentiation for optimal patient care. Conventional approaches to PCL management rely heavily on radiographic imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA), coupled with clinical and biochemical data. However, the observer-dependent nature of image interpretation and the complex morphology of PCLs can lead to diagnostic uncertainty and variability in patient management strategies. This review critically evaluates current PCL diagnosis and surveillance practices, showing features of the different lesions and highlighting the potential limitations of conventional methods. We then explore the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to transform PCL management. AI-driven strategies, including deep learning algorithms for automated pancreas and lesion segmentation, and radiomics for analyzing heterogeneity, can improve diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification. These advanced techniques can provide more objective and reproducible assessments, aiding clinicians in decision-making regarding follow-up intervals and surgical interventions. Early results suggest that AI-driven methods can significantly improve patient outcomes by enabling earlier detection of high-risk lesions and reducing unnecessary procedures for benign cysts. Finally, this review emphasizes that AI-driven approaches could potentially reshape the landscape of PCL management, ultimately leading to improved pancreatic cancer prevention. Full article

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue sampling includes the techniques of fine needle aspiration (FNA) and fine needle biopsy (FNB), and both procedures have revolutionized specimen collection from the gastrointestinal tract, especially from remote/inaccessible organs. EUS-FNB has replaced FNA as the procedure of choice for tissue acquisition in solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs) across various society guidelines. FNB specimens provide a larger histological tissue core (preserving tissue architecture) with fewer needle passes, and this is extremely relevant in today’s era of precision and personalized molecular medicine. Innovations in needle tip design are constantly under development to maximize diagnostic accuracy by enhancing histological sampling capabilities. But, apart from the basic framework of the needle, various other factors play a role that influence diagnostic outcomes, namely, sampling techniques (fanning, aspiration or suction, and number of passes), collection methods, on-site evaluation (rapid, macroscopic, or visual), and specimen processing. The choice taken depends strongly on the endoscopist’s preference, available resources at the disposal, and procedure objectives. Hence, in this review, we explicate in detail the concepts and available literature at our disposal on the topic of EUS-guided pancreatic tissue sampling to best guide any practicing gastroenterologist/endoscopist in a not-to-ideal set-up, which EUS-guided tissue acquisition technique is the “best” for their case to augment their diagnostic outcomes. Full article

Pancreatic cancer has one of the worst prognoses among all malignancies and few available treatment options. Patient-derived xenografts can be used to develop personalized therapy for pancreatic cancer. Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) may provide a powerful alternative to surgery for obtaining sufficient tissue for the establishment of patient-derived xenografts. In this study, EUS-FNA samples were obtained for 30 patients referred to the Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. These samples were used for xenotransplantation in NOD-SCID mice and for genetic analyses. The gene expression of pancreatic-cancer-relevant genes in xenograft tumors was examined by immunohistochemistry. Targeted sequencing of both the patient-derived tumors and xenograft tumors was performed. The xenografts’ susceptibility to oncolytic virus infection was studied by infecting xenograft-derived cells with VSV∆51-GFP. The xenograft take rate was found to be 75.9% for passage 1 and 100% for passage 2. Eighty percent of patient tumor samples were successfully sequenced to a high depth for 42 cancer genes. Xenograft histological characteristics and marker expression were maintained between passages. All tested xenograft samples were susceptible to oncoviral infection. We found that EUS-FNA is an accessible, minimally invasive technique that can be used to acquire adequate pancreatic cancer tissue for the generation of patient-derived xenografts and for genetic sequencing. Full article

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) pose a diagnostic challenge due to their increasing incidence and the limitations of cross-sectional imaging and endoscopic-ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). EUS-guided through the needle biopsy (EUS-TTNB) has emerged as a promising tool for improving the accuracy of cyst type determination and neoplastic risk stratification. EUS-TTNB demonstrates superior diagnostic performance over EUS-FNA, providing critical preoperative information that can significantly influence patient management and reduce unnecessary surgeries. However, the procedure has risks, with an overall adverse event rate of approximately 9%. Preventive measures and further prospective studies are essential to optimize its safety and efficacy. This review highlights the potential of EUS-TTNB to enhance the diagnostic and management approaches for patients with PCLs. It examines the current state of EUS-TTNB, including available devices, indications, procedural techniques, specimen handling, diagnostic yield, clinical impact, and associated adverse events. Full article

Background: Metastatic pancreatic lesions (MPLs) are relatively uncommon, constituting 2 to 5% of all pancreatic tumors. They often manifest as solitary lesions without distinct clinical symptoms, usually identified incidentally during radiologic imaging for the surveillance of prior malignancies. Differentiating these lesions from primary pancreatic tumors presents a significant challenge due to their nonspecific presentation. Methods: We aimed to prospectively assess the effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) in diagnosing MPLs in a carefully selected cohort of patients presenting with pancreatic masses. Additionally, we sought to examine the relevance of specific EUS findings in supporting the initial diagnosis of MPLs and their agreement with the definitive cytological diagnosis. This study retrospectively analyzed data from 41 patients diagnosed with MPLs between 2013 and 2023, focusing on their clinical and pathological characteristics, the echogenic features of the pancreatic lesions, and the techniques used for tissue acquisition. Results: The incidence of MPLs in our cohort was 3.53%, with the most frequent primary tumors originating in the kidney (43.90%), colorectum (9.76%), lung (9.76%), lymphoma (9.76%), and breast (4.88%). MPLs typically presented as hypoechoic, oval-shaped lesions with well-defined borders and were predominantly hypervascular. Interestingly, 68.29% of the cases were discovered incidentally during follow-up of the primary tumors, while the involvement of the common bile duct was uncommon (19.51%). Conclusions: EUS and EUS-FNA/B have been validated as valuable diagnostic tools for identifying MPLs. While our findings are promising, further multicenter studies are necessary to corroborate these results and elucidate the predictive value of specific EUS characteristics in determining the metastatic origin of pancreatic lesions. Full article

Clinicians often use endoscopic ultrasonography to survey pancreatic tumors. When endoscopists conduct this examination and find the tumor to be unresectable, a fine-needle biopsy is subsequently performed for tissue confirmation. However, if the tumor is deemed resectable, the necessity of a pre-operative fine-needle biopsy remains debatable. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis of a single-center cohort of patients with pancreatic tumors who underwent an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy or aspiration (EUS-FNB or FNA) between 2020 and 2022. This study focused on patients diagnosed with resectable malignant pancreatic tumors. The exclusion criteria included individuals diagnosed with benign pancreatic lesions and those with unresectable tumors. A total of 68 patients were enrolled in this study. Histological examination revealed that pancreatic adenocarcinoma was the predominant type of tumor (n = 42, 61.8%), followed by neuroendocrine tumors (n = 22, 32.3%), and metastasis (n = 4, 5.9%). Notably, 17 patients had a history of other cancers, with 23.5% being diagnosed with a metastatic tumor rather than primary pancreatic cancer. Therefore, EUS-FNA/FNB is crucial in patients with a resectable pancreatic tumor and a history of cancer to differentiate between a primary and a metastatic tumor. Full article

Introduction: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) are currently recommended for the pathologic diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions (PSLs). The application of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (ECEUS) could aid the endoscopist during an FNA and/or FNB procedure. CEUS is indeed able to better differentiate the pathologic tissue from the surrounding healthy pancreatic parenchyma and to detect necrotic areas and vessels. Objectives: Our objective was to evaluate if ECEUS could reduce the number of needle passes and side effects and increase the diagnostic efficacy of FNA and/or FNB. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of clinical studies was performed to explore if ECEUS-FNA or FNB could increase diagnostic accuracy and reduce the number of needle passes and adverse effects compared to standard EUS-FNA or FNB. In accordance with the study protocol, a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the evidence was planned. Results: The proportion of established diagnoses of ECEUS was 90.9% compared to 88.3% of EUS, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.14). The diagnosis was made through a single step in 70.9% of ECEUS patients and in 65.3% of EUS patients, without statistical significance (p = 0.24). The incidence of adverse reactions was substantially comparable across both groups (p = 0.89). Conclusion: ECEUS-FNA and FNB do not appear superior to standard EUS-FNA and FNB for the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. Full article

Background and Objectives: The pancreas, ensconced within the abdominal cavity, requires a plethora of sophisticated imaging modalities for its comprehensive evaluation, with ultrasonography serving as a primary investigative technique. A myriad of pancreatic pathologies, encompassing pancreatic neoplasia and a spectrum of inflammatory diseases, are detectable through these imaging strategies. Nevertheless, the intricate anatomical confluence and the pancreas’s deep-seated topography render the visualization and accurate diagnosis of its pathologies a formidable endeavor. The objective of our paper is to review the best diagnostic imagistic tools for the pancreas. Materials and Methods: we have gathered several articles using Prisma guidelines to determine the best imagistic methods. The imperative of pancreatic scanning transcends its diagnostic utility, proving to be a pivotal element in a multitude of clinical specialties, notably surgical oncology. Within this domain, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) of the pancreas holds the distinction of being the paramount imaging modality, endorsed for its unrivaled capacity to delineate the staging and progression of pancreatic carcinoma. In synergy with MDCT, there has been a notable advent of avant-garde imaging techniques in recent years. These advanced methodologies, including ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conjoined with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), have broadened the horizon of tumor characterization, offering unparalleled depth and precision in oncological assessment. Other emerging diagnostic techniques, such as elastography, also hold a lot of potential and promise for the future of pancreatic imaging. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a quick, minimally invasive procedure to evaluate lumps using a thin needle to extract tissue for analysis. It is less invasive than surgical biopsies and usually performed as an outpatient with quick recovery. Its accuracy depends on sample quality, and the risks include minimal bleeding or discomfort. Results, guiding further treatment, are typically available within a week. Elastography is a non-invasive medical imaging technique that maps the elastic properties and stiffness of soft tissue. This method, often used in conjunction with ultrasound or MRI, helps differentiate between hard and soft areas in tissue, providing valuable diagnostic information. It is particularly useful for assessing liver fibrosis, thyroid nodules, breast lumps, and musculoskeletal conditions. The technique is painless and involves applying gentle pressure to the area being examined. The resulting images show tissue stiffness, indicating potential abnormalities. Elastography is advantageous for its ability to detect diseases in early stages and monitor treatment effectiveness. The procedure is quick, safe, and requires no special preparation, with results typically available immediately. Results: The assembled and gathered data shows the efficacy of various techniques in discerning the nature and extent of neoplastic lesions within the pancreas. Conclusions: The most common imaging modalities currently used in diagnosing pancreatic neoplasms are multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), alongside new technologies, such as elastography. Full article

A small tumor size may impact the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs). We aimed to compare the diagnostic yield of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and biopsy (FNB) in SPLs with a diameter ≤ 15 mm. Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-TA for SPLs ≤ 15 mm between January 2015 and December 2022 in a tertiary referral center were retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint was diagnostic accuracy. The final diagnosis was based on surgical pathology or disease evolution after a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Inadequate samples were all considered false negatives for the study. Secondary outcomes included sample adequacy, factors impacting accuracy, and safety. We included 368 patients (52.4% male; mean age: 60.2 years) who underwent FNA in 72 cases and FNB in 296. The mean size of SPLs was 11.9 ± 2.6 mm. More than three passes were performed in 5.7% and 61.5% of patients in the FNB and FNA groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). FNB outperformed FNA in terms of diagnostic accuracy (89.8% vs. 79.1%, p = 0.013) and sample adequacy (95.9% vs. 86.1%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, using FNA (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.07–4.48) and a final diagnosis (OR: 3.56, 95% CI: 1.82–6.94) of benign conditions negatively impacted accuracy. Overall, the adverse event rate was 0.8%, including one pancreatitis in the FNA group and one pancreatitis and one bleeding in the FNB group, all mild and conservatively managed. EUS-TA for SPLs ≤ 15 mm has a high diagnostic yield and safety. This study suggests the superiority of FNB over FNA, with better performance even with fewer passes performed. Full article

Background and Aims: There is limited literature on sample adequacy for molecular testing in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma obtained via endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus EUS fine-needle biopsy (FNB). We aimed to compare these two modalities regarding sample adequacy for molecular and genomic sequencing. Methods: We reviewed all patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent EUS at Saint Luke’s Hospital from 2018 to 2021. The patients were categorized based on the method of EUS tissue acquisition, specifically FNA or FNB. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted for all cases by cytotechnologists. Results: Out of 132 patients who underwent EUS-guided biopsies, 76 opted for FNA, 48 opted for FNB, and 8 opted for a combination of both. The average number of passes required for FNB and FNA was 2.58 ± 1.06 and 2.49 ± 1.07, respectively (p = 0.704), indicating no significant difference. Interestingly, 71.4% (35) of FNB-obtained samples were deemed adequate for molecular testing, surpassing the 32.1% (26) adequacy observed with FNA (p < 0.001). Additionally, 46.4% (26) of FNB-obtained samples were considered adequate for genomic testing, a notable improvement over the 23.8% (20) adequacy observed with FNA (p = 0.005). Conclusion: Although the number of passes required for cytologic diagnosis did not differ significantly between EUS-FNB and EUS-FNA, the former demonstrated superiority in obtaining samples adequate for molecular testing. Tumor surface area and cellularity were crucial parameters in determining sample adequacy for molecular testing, irrespective of the chosen tissue acquisition modality. Full article

Gallbladder (GB) disease is classified into two broad categories: GB wall-thickening and protuberant lesions, which include various lesions, such as adenomyomatosis, cholecystitis, GB polyps, and GB carcinoma. This review summarizes recent advances in the differential diagnosis of GB lesions, focusing primarily on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and related technologies. Fundamental B-mode EUS and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) have been reported to be useful for the diagnosis of GB diseases because they can evaluate the thickening of the GB wall and protuberant lesions in detail. We also outline the current status of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for GB lesions, as there have been scattered reports on EUS-FNA in recent years. Furthermore, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, ranging from machine learning to deep learning, have become popular in healthcare for disease diagnosis, drug discovery, drug development, and patient risk identification. In this review, we outline the current status of AI in the diagnosis of GB. Full article