Search Results (195)

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic posed additional challenges for this vulnerable population, such as Sjögren’s disease (SjD), underscoring the need for effective and safe vaccination strategies. Objective: To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with SjD. Methods: This prospective, observational, longitudinal study included SjD patients from the SAFER cohort. Immunogenicity was assessed via anti-spike IgG (IgG-S) titers using chemiluminescence reported as geometric mean titers (GMT) and fold increase in GMT (FI-GMT). Disease activity was evaluated using the ESSDAI score. Adverse events and COVID-19 infections were also monitored. Assessments were conducted at four time points: pre-first dose (T1), pre-second dose (T2), pre-booster (T3), and four weeks post-booster (T4). Primary vaccination involved ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac), and boosters were either homologous (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) or heterologous (BNT162b2). Results: Among 51 participants (mean age 46 years; 90% female), 41% had comorbidities and 27% (n = 14/51) were highly immunosuppressed. Among those 73% (n = 37/51) under low immunosuppression, n = 8/51 (13%) were not using any medication. At baseline, 11% (n = 4/35) showed moderate/high disease activity, which decreased to 6.5% (n = 2/31) at T4. Primary vaccination was ChAdOx1 in 94% (n = 48/51) and CoronaVac in 6% (n = 3/51); 73% (n = 37/51) received heterologous and 27% (n = 14/51) homologous boosters. COVID-19 infection post-booster occurred in 20% (n = 10/51). Seroconversion rates reached nearly 100% across all medication subgroups except for biologic users, who showed delayed but stable seroconversion by T4. IgG-S titers increased progressively through T4. Primary immunization induced an ascending GMT in both vaccine types. At T4, the GMT was significantly higher in the BNT162b2 group (2148.03 [1452.05–3155.84]; p < 0.001; 95% CI) than in the ChAdOx1 group (324.29 [107.92–974.48]; p < 0.001; 95% CI); the fold-increase in immune response was six times greater with BNT162b2 (5.98 [2.97–12.03]; p = 0.001; 95% CI). Seroconversion was 100% in the heterologous group versus 83% in the homologous group (p > 0.01). Those with prior infection showed significantly higher titers, particularly at T2 and T3 (p < 0.001 for T1–T3). Adverse events were mild and not statistically significant. Multivariate regression confirmed BNT162b2 as an independent factor for higher antibody titers. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccination in patients with SjD was safe and induced high anti-spike antibody titers and seropositivity. Heterologous boosting, particularly with BNT162b2, demonstrated superior immunogenicity. No association was found between vaccination and SjD disease flares or worsening activity. Full article

Background: Numerous studies have proved the efficacy of vaccination in reducing Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission and the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) burden. However, even though the COVID-19 vaccination coverage is high for primary doses, a booster dose is needed to sustain protection. Continuing our previous research, this study evaluates the immunogenicity and safety of full and half doses of two COVID-19 booster vaccines, ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), in individuals primed with ChAdOx1-S. Methods: This study was an observer-blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of half and full doses of two COVID-19 booster vaccine types, BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1-S, among fully vaccinated, ChAdOx1-S-primed individuals in Jakarta, Indonesia. A total of 329 participants were randomized to receive either full or half doses of the booster vaccines, namely the ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines. Immunogenicity was assessed through SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) at 28 days post-booster, while safety was monitored via adverse event reporting. Results: The results showed that both vaccines demonstrated increased geometric mean titers (GMTs) post-booster. In the ChAdOx1-S booster group, at the baseline visit (day 0) and third visit (day 28), no statistically significant differences in GMT between the half- and full-dose groups were observed (p = 0.970 and 0.539, respectively). In the BNT162b2 group, no statistically significant difference was noted at the baseline visit, while the full dose was higher than the half dose at 28 days (Day 28, p = 0.011). Surrogate virus neutralization tests (sVNTs) and NAbs assays also revealed no significant differences between the half and full dose groups for both the Wuhan strain and the Delta variant. The BNT162b2 group compared to the ChAdOx1-S group revealed a statistically significant increase in IgG levels compared to ChAdOx1-S, with p-values of <0.001 and <0.001 for the half dose and full dose, respectively. This was also reflected in the NAbs test results, where BNT162b2 showed significantly higher levels against both the Wuhan strain and Delta variant. Adverse events were predominantly mild: 79.6% (n = 86/108) in the ChAdOx1-S full-dose group, 75.4% (n = 43/57) in the ChAdOx1-S half-dose group, 84.2% (n = 101/120) in the BNT162b2 full-dose group, and 92.6% (n = 88/95) in the BNT162b2 half-dose group, with pain at the injection site being the most common local reaction and myalgia and headache the most frequent systemic reactions. One serious adverse event was reported, assessed as unrelated to the vaccine. Conclusions: This study confirms that half doses of ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2 are as immunogenic and safe as full doses, and a heterologous booster is more immunogenic than a homologous booster. Full article

Background: Dose-sparing approaches can be effective in maintaining immunogenicity and safety while expanding vaccine coverage. We previously demonstrated that a half dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 is as effective and immunogenic for primary vaccination. Methods: This non-inferiority, non-randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, humoral, and cellular immune responses of a third booster dose—comparing half-dose and full-dose regimens—in individuals aged 18–49 years, with a 1-year follow-up. Results: A total of 2801 participants were enrolled: 2352 received half doses and 449 received full doses. The incidence rate of COVID-19 was 225.0 per 1000 person-years in the half-dose group and 173.8 in the full-dose group, with no significant difference in effectiveness (β = −0.05; 95% CrI: −0.24 to 0.15). No deaths occurred, and hospitalization rates were similar. In a subsample (n = 558), anti-S IgG levels peaked 28 days post-dose and declined by day 180 after the primary series [175 (121–252) vs. 121 (71–208) GMT, p < 0.001], but remained elevated after the booster [192.1 (124–297) vs. 550 (380–797) GMT, p < 0.001]. Booster antibody levels were similar between groups [592.4 (318–1140) vs. 550 (380–797) GMT]. The half-dose group showed high titers against Omicron and robust T/B-cell responses (e.g., EMCD4, EMCD8, IFN⁺CD4⁺, CD19⁺TNF⁺). Conclusions: Fractional half dose of ChAdOx nCov-19 was effective and non-inferior to a full booster dose. Homologous regimen with 3 half doses or 3 full doses induced a similar increase in antibody titers and robust cellular response. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05059106). Full article

Background: In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, various COVID-19 vaccines were administered during the pandemic. However, region-specific real-word comparative data on their immunogenicity remain limited. This study aimed to assess the serological responses to Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), Moderna (mRNA-1273), and AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccines in a diverse population living in KSA. Methods: This observational study included 236 adults recruited from vaccination sites in Riyadh. Participants provided serum samples at predefined intervals: before the first dose, after the first dose, after the second dose, and post-vaccination infection (if applicable). IgG and neutralising antibodies were quantified using ELISA assays. Demographic and vaccination data, and their associations with antibody responses, were evaluated. Results: At baseline, 75.4% of participants were positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG, suggesting high prior exposure. Marked incremental increases in IgG levels were observed after each vaccine dose. Both Moderna and Pfizer elicited stronger responses, with Pfizer inducing the strongest early response and Moderna achieving the highest overall titres. Among IgG-positive individuals, neutralising antibodies were detected in 98.1%. There were no statistically significant differences by age or gender, although males tended to show higher mean titres. Heterologous vaccine schedules induced comparable or enhanced immunogenicity relative to homologous schedules, supporting their use in flexible immunisation strategies. Conclusions: All COVID-19 vaccines administered in Saudi Arabia elicited robust antibody responses, particularly the mRNA-based vaccines. Our findings support their continued use and justify varied vaccination approaches, including mix-and-match booster strategies, to enhance community immunity. Full article

Vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 is an important countermeasure to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. This vaccine enhances human immunoprotection against SARS-CoV-2 by inducing an immune response against the SARS-CoV-2 S protein. However, the immune-related genes induced by vaccination remain to be identified. This study employs feature ranking algorithms, an incremental feature selection method, and classification algorithms to analyze transcriptomic data from an experimental group vaccinated with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and a control group vaccinated with the MenACWY meningococcal vaccine. According to different time points, vaccination status, and SARS-CoV-2 infection status, the transcriptomic data was divided into five groups, including a pre-vaccination group, ChAdOx1-onset group, MenACWY-onset group, ChAdOx1-7D group, and MenACWY-7D group. Each group contained samples with 13,383 RNA features and 1662 small RNA features. The results identified key genes that could indicate the efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, and a classifier was developed to classify samples into the above groups. Additionally, effective classification rules were established to distinguish between different vaccination statuses. It was found that subjects vaccinated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and infected with SARS-CoV-2 were characterized by up-regulation of HIST1H3G expression and down-regulation of CASP10 expression. In addition, IGHG1, FOXM1, and CASP10 genes were strongly associated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine efficacy. Compared with previous omics-driven studies, the machine learning algorithms used in this study were able to analyze transcriptome data faster and more comprehensively to identify potential markers associated with vaccine effect and investigate ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine-induced gene expression changes. These observations contribute to an understanding of the immune protection and inflammatory responses induced by the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine during symptomatic episodes and provide a rationale for improving vaccine efficacy. Full article

Background/Objectives: To evaluate how immune responses compare among ethnic groups approximately 2 years after receiving a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1or BBIBP-CorV), we tested T cell responses and Spike-specific RBD-antibody titer, and neutralized antibody titer levels utilizing Spectral Flow cytometry, ELISA, and SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped-based neutralization assays, respectively. Methods: Forty-four individuals from January–December 2023 were identified within the cohort and were classified into different ethnic backgrounds; Black (N = 13), Asian (N = 14), Caucasian (N = 17). We recognize that the “Asian” group includes diverse subpopulations with distinct genetic and environmental backgrounds, which could not be further stratified due to sample-size limitations. Spike-specific AIM+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cell responses were assessed and evaluated against SARS-CoV-2 variants, including the ancestral Wuhan, Delta, and multiple Omicron subvariants (B1.1529, BA2.86, BA.4/5, and XBB.1). Alongside we tested the RBD-IgG and neutralizing antibody titers against the ancestral Wuhan. Spearman’s correlation analysis was utilized to determine corelative relationships among the AIM+ and CD4+ T cell responses, as well as the RBD-IgG and neutralizing antibody titers. Results: Our results show robust and comparable RBD-IgG and neutralizing antibody titers across all groups, with a significant positive correlation between these two measurements. Significant differences were observed in T-cell activation, with Asian participants exhibiting lower frequencies of Spike-specific CD4+ T cells against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants and higher frequencies of cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-2) as compared to the Caucasian group. Breakthrough infection status was not fully controlled and may influence these findings. Conclusion: Despite a small sample size and potential confounding by natural infections within our long-time-span sampling, our data suggest persistent cellular and humoral immunity 2 years after vaccination across ethnicities, with notable differences in T cell activation and cytokine profile. These preliminary observations highlight the need for larger, more detailed studies that consider intra-ethnic diversity and hybrid immunity to better understand ethnic differences in COVID-19 vaccine responses. Full article

Background/Objectives: Although the COVID-19 pandemic has largely concluded, the varied trajectories it has followed in different regions of the world remain incompletely understood. Intensive research is needed to fully grasp its course and the implications for future global health challenges. Notably, the milder trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic in Sub-Saharan Africa has defied initial predictions. An emerging body of evidence suggests that, in addition to the continent’s younger average age and the lower prevalence of relevant comorbidities, co-infections with helminths may have also impressively shaped the pandemic’s milder trajectory in the region. Indeed, helminths are renowned for their ability to modulate human immune responses, which, while potentially beneficial in limiting excessive inflammation, could also diminish vaccine efficacy and impede viral clearance. This study investigated different aspects of the intricate interactions between COVID-19 and Lymphatic Filariasis (LF), a helminth infection caused by parasitic worms such as Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi, and Brugia timori and endemic to various regions in Sub-Saharan Africa and the tropics. Methods: For this purpose, samples of a larger and ongoing clinical trial (ethical approval codes: CHRPE/AP/525/17 and 325/21; trial registration number ISRCTN14042737) were collected from 222 individuals from endemic areas of Ghana, along with comprehensive clinical and demographic data. The samples include LF patients (n = 222) grouped according to their Lymphoedema (LE) stages, as well as COVID-19 vaccinated (n = 81) and non-vaccinated individuals (n = 141). All vaccinated participants received the COVID-19 vaccine ChAdOx1-S (also known as Vaxzevria) developed by the University of Oxford and AstraZenca. The expressions of SARS-CoV-2 and filarial-specific antibodies (IgG, IgA) were accessed using ELISA, while Luminex-based immunoassays were employed to measure the expression of SARS-CoV-2 variant-specific neutralizing antibodies. The interplay between vaccine responses and demographic factors was analyzed using group comparisons with the Kruskal-Wallis or Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: The results indicate that a remarkable portion of unvaccinated individuals (56% IgA seropositive, 39% IgG seropositive) developed antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 despite no confirmed infection. Notably, the study identified a robust antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination, which was independent of the degree of LF pathology or parasitic status. An important observation was the reduced SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in individuals seropositive for Ascaris lumbricoides (p = 0.0264), highlighting an interaction between roundworm infection and COVID-19. Conclusions: The study concludes that the ChAdOx1-S COVID-19 vaccine (AstraZeneca) triggers a strong immune response in LF patients; however, filarial and/or soil-transmitted helminth seropositivity might influence the COVID-19 infection-induced response. These findings emphasize the complexity of infectious disease dynamics in co-infected populations and the need to decipher parasite-induced immunomodulatory mechanisms on COVID-19 vaccination. Full article

Background/Objectives: Understanding the behavior of B cells during infection and vaccination is important for determining protective humoral immunity. We evaluated the profile of humoral immunity and B cell pool in individuals who were acutely infected with SARS-CoV-2, recovered from COVID-19, or received two doses of the AZD1222 vaccine. Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from these individuals were subjected to in vitro stimulation to promote the differentiation of B cells into antibody-secreting cells (ASCs), and the ELISpot evaluated the abundance of pan and SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1-reactive IgG+ ASC. Stimulated PBMCs were characterized using flow cytometry. Culture supernatants were assessed for soluble B-cell-activating factors. The IgA and IgG for the S1 were evaluated through ELISA. Results: The recovered individuals displayed a robust S1 ASC compared to acute and vaccinated individuals. Although the frequency of total B cells or B cell subsets did not vary among the groups, plasmablast cells were increased in naïve and double-negative B cells in the acute, recovered, and vaccinated individuals. Similar IgA and IgG production appeared to be present in the acute and recovered individuals. During vaccination, more IgG is produced than IgA. In acute patients, BAFF levels were positively correlated with total B cells and IgG+ plasmablast cells but negatively correlated with IgA+ plasmablast cells. Conclusions: Vaccination and natural infection with COVID-19 induce a differential profile and functionality of B cells. We suggest that new vaccines against COVID-19 incorporate molecular adjuvants that regulate B lymphocyte functionality and consider the beneficial aspects of the IgA response in addition to IgG. Full article

Background/Objectives: The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) depends on the underlying disease, immunosuppression degree and the vaccine regimens. We evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of different COVID-19 vaccine schedules. Methods: The SAFER study: “Safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Disease”, is a Brazilian multicentric prospective observational phase IV study in the real-life. Data were analyzed after 2 or 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccines: adenoviral vectored vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Astrazeneca), mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2, Pfizer–BioNTech) or inactivated SARS-COV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac, Sinovac Biotech). IgG antibody against SARS-CoV-2 spike (IgG-S) receptor-binding domain level were quantified at baseline (T1) and 28 days after the first (T2), 2nd (T3) and 3rd (T4) doses by chemiluminescence (SARS-CoV-2-IgG-II Quant-assay, Abbott-Laboratories). Results: 721 patients with IMID were included in the analysis. The median titers of IgG-S (BAU/mL) increased progressively over the times: at baseline was 6.26 (5.41–7.24), T2: 73.01 (61.53–86.62), T3: 200.0 (174.36–229.41) and T4: 904.92 (800.49–1022.97). The multivariate linear regression showed that greater IgG-S titers were associated with pre-exposure to COVID-19 (p < 0.001) and BNT162b2 booster vaccine (p < 0.001). Rituximab and immunosuppressant drugs were independent factors for low titers (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, respectively). No serious adverse event was reported. Conclusions: All platforms were safe and induced an increase in IgG-S antibodies. COVID-19 pre-exposure and BNT162b2 booster regimens were predictors of higher humoral immune responses, which is relevant in immunosuppressed populations. Immunosuppressants (mainly rituximab) predicted the lowest antibodies. Full article

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the rapid development of vaccines, including the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (AstraZeneca) vaccine. While effective, adverse effects have been reported, including cutaneous manifestations. Kaposi sarcoma (KS), a vascular tumor linked to Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus/human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8), has seen increased detection during the pandemic. This study reports a case of classic cutaneous KS in a 79-year-old male following the first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine, without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. The patient developed multiple reddish-blue papules on his legs and feet, confirmed as KS through histopathology. Treatment included radiotherapy and sequential chemotherapy with Doxorubicin. The potential reactivation of latent HHV-8 by the vaccine is explored through mechanisms involving the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and adenovirus vector, which may induce immune responses and inflammatory pathways. Although establishing a direct causal link remains challenging, the case highlights the need for vigilance regarding KS reactivation post-vaccination. Further large-scale studies are warranted to elucidate the relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and latent virus reactivation, ensuring comprehensive safety assessments and informed public health decisions. Full article

Background: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare but severe complication following vaccination with adenovirus vector-based COVID-19 vaccines. Antibodies directed against platelet factor 4 (PF4) are thought to be responsible for platelet activation and subsequent thromboembolic events in these patients. Since a single vaccination does not lead to sufficient immunization, subsequent vaccinations against COVID-19 have been recommended. However, concerns exist regarding the possible development of a new thromboembolic episode after subsequent vaccinations in VITT patients. Methods: We prospectively analyzed follow-up data from four VITT patients (three women and one man; median age, 44 years [range, 22 to 62 years]) who subsequently received additional COVID-19 vaccines. Platelet counts, anti-PF4/heparin antibody level measurements, and a functional platelet activation assay were performed at each follow-up visit. Additionally, we conducted a literature review and summarized similar reports on the outcome of subsequent vaccinations in patients with VITT. Results: The patients had developed thrombocytopenia and thrombosis 4 to 17 days after the first vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. The optical densities (ODs) of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies decreased with time, and three out of four patients tested negative within 4 months. One patient remained positive even after 10 months post first vaccination. All four patients received an mRNA-based vaccine as a second vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. No significant drop in platelet count or new thromboembolic complications were observed during follow-up. We identified seven publications reporting subsequent COVID-19 vaccination in VITT patients. None of the patients developed thrombocytopenia or thrombosis after the subsequent vaccination. Conclusion: Subsequent vaccination with an mRNA vaccine appears to be safe in VITT patients. Full article

Breakthrough COVID-19 (occurring in fully vaccinated people) has been described. Data on its characteristics among immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) patients are scarce. This study describes breakthrough COVID-19 occurring in IMRD patients participating in the SAFER-study, a Brazilian multicentric cohort evaluating the safety, effectiveness, and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with autoimmune diseases. A descriptive analysis of the population and a binary logistic regression model were performed to evaluate the predictors of COVID-19-related hospitalization. A p-value < 0.05 was significant. The included 160 patients were predominantly females (83.1%), with a mean (SD) age of 40.23 (13.19) years. The patients received two (19%), three (70%), or four (11%) vaccine doses. The initial two-dose series was mainly with ChAdOx1 (Oxford/AstraZeneca) (58%) or BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm-Beijing) (34%). The first booster (n = 150) was with BNT162b2 (BioNtech/Fosun Pharma/Pfizer) (63%) or ChAdOx1 (29%). The second booster (n = 112) was with BNT162b2 (40%) or ChAdOx1 (26%). The COVID-19 hospitalization rate was 17.5%. IMRD moderate/high activity (OR: 5.84; CI: 1.9–18.5; p = 0.002) and treatment with corticosteroids (OR: 2.94; CI: 1.02–8.49; p = 0.0043) were associated with higher odds of hospitalization, while increasing the number of vaccine doses was protective (OR: 0.37; CI: 0.15–0.9; p = 0.032). These findings, along with previous reassuring results about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines, argue in favor of booster vaccination in IMRD patients. Full article

During the COVID-19 pandemic, antibody-based vaccines targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein were the focus for development because neutralizing antibodies were associated with protection against the SARS-CoV-2 infection pre-clinically and in humans. While deploying these spike-based vaccines saved millions of lives worldwide, it has become clear that the immunological mechanisms of protection against severe disease are multifaceted and involve non-neutralizing antibody components. Here, we describe a novel pan-sarbecovirus T-cell vaccine, ChAdOx1.COVconsv12, designed to complement and broaden the protection of spike vaccines. The vaccine immunogen COVconsv12 employs the two regions in the viral proteome most conserved among sarbecoviruses, which are delivered by replication-deficient vector ChAdOx1. It directs T cells towards epitopes shared among sarbecoviruses including evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants. Here, we show that ChAdOx1.COVconsv12 induced broad T-cell responses in the BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. In the Syrian hamster challenge model, ChAdOx1.COVconsv12 alone did not protect against the SARS-CoV-2 infection, but when co-administered with 1/50th of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 spike vaccine protective dose, faster recovery and lower oral swab viral load were observed. Induction of CD8⁺ T cells may decrease COVID-19 severity and extend the T-cell response coverage of variants to match the known (and as yet unknown) members of the β-coronavirus family. Full article

A better understanding of the long-term safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines is needed. This phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study for AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) primary-series vaccination enrolled 32,450 participants in the USA, Chile, and Peru between August 2020 and January 2021 (NCT04516746). Endpoints included the 2-year follow-up assessment of safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity. After 2 years, no emergent safety signals were observed for AZD1222, and no cases of thrombotic thrombocytopenia syndrome were reported. The assessment of anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibody titers confirmed the durability of AZD1222 efficacy for up to 6 months, after which infection rates in the AZD1222 group increased over time. Despite this, all-cause and COVID-19-related mortality remained low through the study end, potentially reflecting the post-Omicron decoupling of SARS-CoV-2 infection rates and severe COVID-19 outcomes. Geometric mean titers were elevated for anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies at the 1-year study visit and the anti-spike antibodies were elevated at year 2, providing further evidence of increasing SARS-CoV-2 infections over long-term follow-up. Overall, this 2-year follow-up of the AZD1222 phase 3 study confirms that the long-term safety profile remains consistent with previous findings and supports the continued need for COVID-19 booster vaccinations due to waning efficacy and humoral immunity. Full article

There are varying data concerning the effect of prior anti-vector immunity on the T-cell response induced by immunisation with an identical vectored vaccine containing a heterologous antigen insert. To determine whether prior exposure to ChAdOx1-SARS-CoV2 immunisation (Vaxzevria^®) impacts magnitudes of antigen-specific T-cell responses elicited by subsequent administration of the same viral vector (encoding HBV antigens, ChAdOx1-HBV), healthy volunteers that had received Vaxzevria^® (n = 15) or the Pfizer or Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (n = 11) between 10 and 18 weeks prior were recruited to receive a single intramuscular injection of ChAdOx1-HBV. Anti-ChAdOx1-neutralising antibody titers were determined, and vector or insert-specific T-cell responses were measured by a gamma-interferon ELISpot and intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay using multiparameter flow cytometry. Participants were followed for three months after the ChAdOx1-HBV injection, which was well-tolerated, and no dropouts occurred. The baseline ChAdOx1 neutralisation titers were higher in the Vaxzevria^® cohort (median of 848) than in the mRNA cohort (median of 25). T-cell responses to HBV antigens, measured by ELISpot, were higher on day 28 in the mRNA group (p = 0.013) but were similar between groups on day 84 (p = 0.441). By ICS, these differences persisted at the last time point. There was no clear correlation between the baseline responses to the adenoviral hexon and the subsequent ELISpot responses. As vaccination within 3 months using the same viral vector backbone affected the insert-specific T-cell responses, a greater interval after prior adenoviral immunisation using heterologous antigens may be warranted in settings in which these cells play critical roles. Full article