Search Results (14)

Background and Objectives: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the mainstay of treatment for symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) in patients over 70 years of age. It is also indicated for younger patients with significant comorbidities, for valve-in-valve interventions, and in selected patients with severe aortic insufficiency. We aimed to evaluate procedural and clinical outcomes of transfemoral TAVI performed over the course of 12 years by the same operators using different bioprosthetic valves. Materials and Methods: Between 2012 and 2023, 375 patients underwent TAVI in our clinic, with six types of bioprosthetic valves (Edwards Sapien XT, Medtronic Valves [CoreValve and Evolut R], Portico, Myval, Acurate Neo, and Direct Flow Medical). A transfemoral approach was used in all patients. The procedural and clinical outcomes were defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) criteria. Results: The mean age of the patients was 78.4 ± 7.3, and their median STS score was 4.2 (2.9–5.9). Of the 375 patients, 361 had severe AS, 4 had severe aortic insufficiency, 5 were valve-in-valve, and 5 were valve-in-TAVI. Seven patients required a second valve implantation: four due to embolization of the prosthetic valve and three due to deep implantation of the prosthetic valve. Based on the VARC-3 criteria, the rates of technical success and device success were 90.4% and 85.3%, respectively. Major vascular complications were observed in 18 (4.8%) patients. Also, 42 (11.2%) patients required permanent pacemaker implantation. The incidence of moderate or worse paravalvular leak was 2.9%. The peri-procedural, 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality rates were 5.1%, 4.3%, 15.2%, and 45.6%, respectively. STS scores (HR:1.129, 95%CI: 1.068–1.192, p < 0.001) and post-TAVI acute kidney injury (HR:3.993, 95%CI:1.629–9.785, p = 0.002) were detected as independent predictors of mortality in Cox regression analysis. Conclusions: This registry demonstrated the evolution of TAVI procedures at a single center over 12 years. A high level of collaboration between experienced operators and innovations in devices seem to be the key features for achieving high procedural success and low complication rates. Full article

Background: Self-expanding transcatheter heart valves (SEVs) are often used to treat Sievers type 1 bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis. It remains unclear, however, if different SEVs yield similar outcomes in BAV stenosis, a class effect, or if the unique design features of different SEVs produce disparate clinical results. Objectives: This is a “proof-of-concept” study that compares procedural and clinical outcomes of Acurate neo2 and Evolut Pro/Pro+/Fx platforms in Sievers type 1 BAV stenosis. Methods: The CLASS effect is a retrospective, multicenter registry that enrolls patients with raphe-type 1 BAV stenosis undergoing TAVI at 29 international centers, who received Acurate neo2 and Evolut Pro/Pro+/Fx devices. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to adjust for baseline imbalances. Primary endpoints included VARC-3 technical success, 30-day device success, and early safety according to VARC-3. Results: Among 389 eligible patients, 155 and 234 patients were treated with Acurate neo2 and Evolut platforms, respectively. A higher rate of technical success was observed in the Evolut group (Acurate neo2 vs. Evolut: 93.4% vs. 97.1%, OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19–0.83, and p = 0.017). At 30 days, device success was comparable (90.1% vs. 89.4%, OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.68–1.75, and p = 0.733), whereas Acurate neo2 was associated with a higher rate of early safety (84.1% vs. 70.4%, OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.56–3.17, and p < 0.001), which was mainly driven by a lower risk of new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) (6.3% vs. 19.5%, OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16–0.46, and p < 0.001). Conclusions: Acurate neo2 and Evolut Pro/Pro+/Fx platforms provide similarly effective procedural and short-term outcomes in Sievers type 1 BAV stenosis. However, Evolut was associated with a higher technical success, while Acurate neo2 demonstrated a lower incidence of new PPI. Full article

Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease, associated with poor outcomes if left untreated. Current guidelines recommend that transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures be performed in hospitals with an on-site cardiac surgery unit due to potential complications requiring surgical intervention. Objective: Based on our experience, we evaluated the feasibility and outcomes of implementing a TAVI program in a cardiology department without an on-site cardiac surgery unit, in collaboration with a remote hospital for surgical backup. Methods: The TAVI program involved pre- and post-procedural evaluations conducted at Meir Medical Center (Kfar Saba, Israel) with a remote surgical team available. The study population included 149 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis treated at the Meir valve clinic between November 2019 and December 2023. Procedures were performed by the center’s interventional cardiology team. Results: The mean age of the 149 patients was 80 ± 6 years, and 75 (50%) were female. The average STS score was 4.3, and the EuroSCORE II was 3.1. Among the patients, 68 (45%) were classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV. The valve types used included ACURATE neo2 (57 patients, 38%), Edwards SAPIEN 3 (43 patients, 28%), Evolut-PRO (41 patients, 27%), and Navitor (7 patients, 4%). There were no cases of moderate to severe paravalvular leak and no elevated post-implantation gradients, and there was no need for urgent cardiac surgery. One case of valve embolization was successfully managed percutaneously during the procedure. In-hospital follow-up revealed no deaths and only one major vascular complication. At one-year follow-up, six patients had died, with only one death attributed to cardiac causes. Conclusions: Our findings support the safe and effective performance of transfemoral TAVI in cardiology departments without on-site cardiac surgery, in collaboration with a remote surgical team. Further prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to confirm these results and guide broader clinical implementation of this practice. Full article

Background/Objectives: Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a key approach for treating degenerated surgical bioprosthetic valves. The ACURATE neo2 valve, with its advanced sealing technology and optimized coronary access, represents a promising solution for the challenges of ViV TAVI. This study evaluates the procedural and 30-day and 1-year follow-up outcomes of the ACURATE neo2 valve in ViV TAVI. Methods: This single-center, single-operator prospective study included patients with symptomatic bioprosthetic valve dysfunction, classified in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV, who underwent ViV TAVI with ACURATE neo2 at our center between July 2022 and February 2024. Outcomes were assessed using VARC-3 criteria. Results: Fifty-five patients (51% females, median (IQR) age 76 (8) years) were included. The technical success rate was 98.2%. No patients experienced in-hospital mortality, stroke, MI, bleeding, vascular complications, renal failure, or new pacemaker implantation. Three patients (5.5%) underwent elective chimney stenting for coronary protection. The postprocedural mean aortic gradient was 6.7 ± 1 mmHg, with a mean aortic valve area (AVA) of 2.0 ± 0.1 cm². Over a median follow-up period of 1.2 years, no deaths (0%) were observed, heart failure hospitalization rate was 3.6%, and NYHA class improved to ≤II in 100% of patients. Conclusions: ACURATE neo2 demonstrated excellent technical success, sustained hemodynamic performance, and significant clinical improvement in ViV TAVI. The absence of major adverse events reinforces its safety, efficacy, and durability as a treatment for degenerated surgical bioprostheses. Full article

Background/Objectives: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most prevalent valvular heart disease in developed countries and imposes an increasing burden on aging populations. Although transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has transformed the treatment of severe AS, current guidelines do not differentiate management based on gender. This study aimed to investigate gender-based differences in procedural complications and one-year clinical outcomes in patients treated with next-generation self-expandable TAVI devices. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter international registry included 3862 consecutive patients who received either the ACURATE neo or Evolut R/Pro valve. Patients were stratified by gender; propensity score matching (PSM) adjusted for baseline differences. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or stroke at one year. Secondary endpoints included major vascular complications, major or life-threatening bleeding and acute kidney injury (AKI). Results: Of 3353 patients included (64.5% female), women were older (82.3 ± 5.6 vs. 81.1 ± 6.2 years, p < 0.001) and had higher STS scores (5.2 ± 3.9 vs. 4.5 ± 3.4%, p < 0.001). In the unmatched population, major vascular complications occurred in 7.7% of females versus 4.1% of males (p < 0.001), life-threatening bleeding in 2.8% vs. 1.4% (p = 0.016) and AKI in 8.5% vs. 5.7% (p = 0.009). After PSM, the primary endpoint was more frequent in females (9.4% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.014), largely driven by stroke (2.8% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.024), while overall mortality was similar (11.3% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.264). Conclusions: Despite comparable long-term survival, female patients undergoing TAVI with self-expandable valves experience higher rates of procedural complications, notably stroke and major vascular events. These findings underscore the need for tailored procedural strategies to improve outcomes in female patients. Full article

Background: Precise implantation could play a crucial role in the technical success of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for some prostheses. The impact of an accidental implantation depth (ID) outside the recommended range has not been assessed for the ACURATE neo2 (NEO2). Methods: Data from 1839 patients with severe native aortic stenosis treated with the NEO2 prosthesis were evaluated. We compared the results of prostheses implanted in an ID both inside and outside the recommendations. The outcome assessment followed the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria. Results: Patients were retrospectively divided into high (<3 mm; n = 412), optimal (3–7 mm; n = 1236), and low (>7 mm; n = 169) implantations. Technical success (94.7% vs. 94.7% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.296) and device success were high (90.1% vs. 89.3% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.112) without differences between groups. Rates of relevant paravalvular regurgitation (PVL; >mild or VinV due to PVL) were comparable (1.2% vs. 1.8% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.759). Even when hemodynamics were superior in the high-implantation group, with greater iEOA (1.01 cm²/m² vs. 0.95 cm²/m² vs. 0.92 cm²/m², p < 0.001), spontaneous embolization or after post-dilatation was more common. Low implantation was associated with a higher rate of associated pacemaker implantation (PPI) (6.1% vs. 8.8% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Implantation with the ACURATE neo2 showed excellent hemodynamic results, including low gradients and a small number of relevant PVL, in line with a high technical success rate that was irrespective of the ID. A favorable outcome can also be achieved in accidental low or high positions. Low implantation was associated with a higher rate of associated pacemaker implantation. Deliberately high implantation should be avoided due to the risk of embolization. Full article

Background: Severe calcification of the ascending aorta increases the peri-operative risk for neurological complications in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) seems to be an optimal treatment option in these patients. However, the impact of the extent of aortic calcification on procedural and neurological outcomes during TAVI is unclear. Methods: Data from 3010 patients with severe native aortic valve stenosis treated with ACURATE neo/neo2 from May 2012 to July 2022 were evaluated and matched by 2-to-1 nearest-neighbor matching to identify one patient with porcelain aorta (PA) (n = 492) compared with two patients without PA (n = 984). PA was additionally subdivided into circumferential (classic PA) (n = 89; 3.0%) and non-circumferential (partial PA) (n = 403; 13.4%) calcification. We compared outcomes according to VARC-3 criteria among patients with and without PA and identified predictors for occurrence of stroke in the overall population. Results: Technical success (88.5% vs. 87.4%, p = 0.589) and device success at 30 days (82.3% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.755) after transcatheter ACURATE neo/neo2 implantation according to VARC-3 definition was high and did not differ between non-calcified aortas or PA. The rate of in-hospital complications according to VARC-3-definitions was low in both groups. Rates of all stroke (3.2% (n = 31) vs. 2.6% (n = 13), p = 0.705) or transitory ischemic attacks (1.1% vs. 1.2%, p = 1.000) did not differ significantly. Thirty-day all-cause mortality did not differ (3.0% vs. 3.2%, RR 1.1; p = 0.775). Overall device migration/embolization (OR 5.0 $\left[2.10;11.87\right]$), severe bleeding (OR 1.79 $\left[1.11;2.89\right]$), and major structural cardiac complications (OR 3.37 $\left[1.32;8.57\right]$) were identified as independent predictors for in-hospital stroke in a multivariate analysis after implantation of ACURATE neo/neo2. Conclusion: A porcelain aorta does not increase the risk of neurological complications after transfemoral ACURATE neo/neo2 implantation. Based on these findings, transfemoral ACURATE neo/neo2 implantation is safe in these particularly vulnerable patients. Full article

(1) Background: Hemodynamic assessment of prosthetic heart valves using conventional 2D transthoracic Echocardiography-Doppler (2D-TTE) has limitations. Of those, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area measurement is one of the major limitations of the continuity equation, which assumes a circular LVOT. (2) Methods: This study comprised 258 patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), who were treated with the ACURATE neo2. The LVOT area and its dependent Doppler-derived parameters, including effective orifice area (EOA) and stroke volume (SV), in addition to their indexed values, were calculated from post-TAVI 2D-TTE. In addition, the 3D-LVOT area from pre-procedural MDCT scans was obtained and used to calculate corrected Doppler-derived parameters. The incidence rates of prosthesis patient mismatch (PPM) were compared between the 2D-TTE and MDCT-based methods (3) Results: The main results show that the 2D-TTE measured LVOT is significantly smaller than 3D-MDCT (350.4 ± 62.04 mm² vs. 405.22 ± 81.32 mm²) (95% Credible interval (CrI) of differences: −55.15, −36.09), which resulted in smaller EOA (2.25 ± 0.59 vs. 2.58 ± 0.63 cm²) (Beta = −0.642 (95%CrI of differences: −0.85, −0.43), and lower SV (73.88 ± 21.41 vs. 84.47 ± 22.66 mL), (Beta = −7.29 (95% CrI: −14.45, −0.14)), respectively. PPM incidence appears more frequent with 2D-TTE- than 3D-MDCT-corrected measurements (based on the EOAi) 8.52% vs. 2.32%, respectively. In addition, significant differences regarding the EOA among the three valve sizes (S, M and L) were seen only with the MDCT, but not on 2D-TTE. (4) Conclusions: The corrected continuity equation by combining the 3D-LVOT area from MDCT with the TTE Doppler parameters might provide a more accurate assessment of hemodynamic parameters and PPM diagnosis in patients treated with TAVI. The ACURATE neo2 THV has a large EOA and low incidence of PPM using the 3D-corrected LVOT area than on 2D-TTE. These findings need further confirmation on long-term follow-up and in other studies. Full article

Background: Self-expanding transcatheter valves (THV) seem superior to balloon-expanding valves in regard to the incidence of prosthesis–patient mismatch (PPM). Data on the occurrence of PPM with the ACURATE neo/neo2 system as a representative of self-expanding prostheses in very small annuli, even below the applicable instructions for use (IFU), are scarce. Methods: Data from 654 patients with severe native aortic stenosis treated with the smallest size ACURATE neo/neo2 valve (size S, 23 mm) at two German high-volume centers from 06/2012 to 12/2021 were evaluated. We compared clinical and hemodynamic outcomes among patients with implantation in adherence to the recommended sizing (on-label n = 529) and below the recommended sizing range (off-label n = 125) and identified predictors for PPM in the overall population. BMI-adjusted PPM was defined according to VARC-3 recommendations. Results: Post-procedure, the mean gradient (10.0 mmHg vs. 9.0 mmHg, p = 0.834) and the rate of paravalvular leakage (PVL) ≥ moderate (3.2% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.770) were similar between on-label and off-label implantations. The rate of moderate to severe PPM (24%) was comparably low in ACURATE neo/neo2 S, with a very low proportion of severe PPM whether implanted off- or on-label (4.9% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.552). Thirty-day all-cause mortality was higher among patients with off-label implantations (6.5% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.036). In the subgroup of these patients, no device-related deaths occurred, and cardiac causes did not differ (each 5). Besides small annulus area and high BMI, a multivariate analysis identified a greater cover index (OR 3.26), deep implantation (OR 2.25) and severe calcification (OR 2.07) as independent predictors of PPM. Conclusions: The ACURATE neo/neo2 S subgroup shows a convincing hemodynamic outcome according to low mean gradient even outside the previous IFUs without a relevant increase in the rate of PVL or PPM. In addition to known factors such as annulus area and BMI, potential predictors for PPM are severe annulus calcification and implantation depth. Nevertheless, the ACURATE neo/neo2 system seems to be a reliable option in patients with very small annuli. Full article

Background: In recent years, trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an excellent alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Currently, there are several approved devices on the market, yet comparisons among them are scarce. We aimed to compare the various devices via a network meta-analysis. Methods: We performed a network meta-analysis including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-matched studies that provide comparisons of either a single TAVI with SAVR or two different TAVI devices and report clinical outcomes. Results: We included 12 RCT and 13 propensity-matched studies comprising 42,105 patients, among whom 27,134 underwent TAVI using various valve systems (Sapien & Sapien XT, Sapien 3, Corvalve, Evolut & Evolut Pro, Acurate Neo, Portico). The mean follow-up time was 23.4 months. Sapien 3 was superior over SAVR in the reduction of all-cause mortality (OR = 0.53; 95%CrI 0.31–0.91), while no significant difference existed between other devices and SAVR. Aortic regurgitation was more frequent among TAVI devices compared to SAVR. There was no significant difference between the various THVs and SAVR in cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, NYHA class III-IV, and endocarditis. Conclusions: Newer generation TAVI devices, especially Sapien 3 and Evolut R/Pro are associated with improved outcomes compared to SAVR and other devices of the older generation. Full article

Background: During the last years, several transcatheter aortic heart valves entered the clinical market and are commercially available. The prostheses differ regarding several technical and functional aspects. However, little is known regarding head-to-head comparative data of the ACURATE neo and the PORTICO valve prostheses. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare two self-expanding transcatheter aortic heart valves (THV), the ACURATE neo and the PORTICO, with regard to in-hospital and 30-day outcomes, as well as early device failures. Methods: A total of 1591 consecutive patients with severe native aortic valve stenosis from two centers were included in the analyses and matched by 1:1 nearest neighbor matching to identify one patient treated with PORTICO (n = 344) for each patient treated with ACURATE neo (n = 344). Results: In-hospital complications were comparable between both valves, including any kind of stroke (ACURATE neo = 3.5% vs. PORTICO = 3.8%; p = 1.0), major vascular complications (ACURATE neo = 4.5% vs. PORTICO = 5.4%; p = 0.99) or life-threatening bleeding (ACURATE neo = 1% vs. PORTICO = 2%; p = 0.68). The rate of device failure defined by the VARC-2 criteria were comparable, including elevated gradients and moderate-to-severe paravalvular leakage (ACURATE neo = 7.3% vs. PORTICO = 7.6%; p = 1.0). However, the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) was significantly more frequent after the use of PORTICO THV (9.5% vs. 18.7%; p = 0.002). Conclusions: In this two-center case-matched comparison, short-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes showed comparable results between PORTICO and ACURATE neo prostheses. However, PORTICO was associated with a significant higher incidence of PPI. Full article

The new-generation ACURATE neo2 system was commercially released in September 2020. In this study, we sought to compare the aortic regurgitation (AR) severity of the ACURATE neo2 versus the ACURATE neo transcatheter heart valve, using quantitative videodensitometric angiography (qAR). This is a retrospective, Corelab analysis of final post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) aortograms of patients treated with the ACURATE neo2 and ACURATE neo systems. The ACURATE neo2 cohort comprised consecutive patients treated between September 2020 and January 2021 at two centers. The ACURATE neo cohort included consecutive patients treated before September 2020. Our primary objective was to compare AR severity on qAR following TAVI with ACURATE neo2 and ACURATE neo. Out of 401 aortograms, 228 (56.9%) were analyzable, with 120 in the ACURATE neo2 cohort, and 108 in the ACURATE neo cohort. The mean AR fraction was 4.4 ± 4.8% in the neo2 cohort, and 9.9 ± 8.2% in the neo cohort (p < 0.001). Furthermore, moderate or severe AR (qAR > 17%) was detected in 2 aortograms (1.7%) in the neo2 cohort and 15 aortograms (13.9%) in the neo cohort (p < 0.001). Quantitative aortography shows a lower rate of moderate or severe paravalvular AR in what is the first European experience of the new-generation, self-expanding ACURATE neo2 when compared to the first-generation ACURATE neo. Moreover, aortographic data need to be correlated and compared to Core Laboratory-adjudicated 30-day echocardiographic data. Full article

Frequent occurrence of paravalvular leak (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was the main concern with earlier-generation devices. Current meta-analysis compared outcomes of TAVR with next-generation devices: ACURATE neo and SAPIEN 3. In random-effects meta-analysis, the pooled incidence rates of procedural, clinical and functional outcomes according to VARC-2 definitions were assessed. One randomized controlled trial and five observational studies including 2818 patients (ACURATE neo n = 1256 vs. SAPIEN 3 n = 1562) met inclusion criteria. ACURATE neo was associated with a 3.7-fold increase of moderate-to-severe PVL (RR (risk ratio): 3.70 (2.04–6.70); P < 0.0001), which was indirectly related to higher observed 30-day mortality with ACURATE valve (RR: 1.77 (1.03–3.04); P = 0.04). Major vascular complications, acute kidney injury, periprocedural myocardial infarction, stroke and serious bleeding events were similar between devices. ACURATE neo demonstrated lower transvalvular pressure gradients both at discharge (P < 0.00001) and at 30 days (P < 0.00001), along with lower risk of patient–prosthesis mismatch (RR: 0.29 (0.10–0.87); P = 0.03) and pacemaker implantation (RR: 0.64 (0.50–0.81); P = 0.0002), but no differences were observed regarding composite endpoints early safety and device success. In conclusion, ACURATE neo, as compared with SAPIEN 3, was associated with higher rates of moderate-to-severe PVL, which were indirectly linked with increased observed 30-day all-cause mortality. Full article