Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Marco Padovani ORCID = 0000-0003-2303-0096

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 1725 KiB  
Communication
Onabotulinumtoxin-A: Previous Prophylactic Treatment Might Improve Subsequent Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies Response in Patients with Chronic Migraine
by Giulia Ceccardi, Francesca Schiano di Cola, Salvatore Caratozzolo, Michele Di Pasquale, Marco Bolchini, Alessandro Padovani and Renata Rao
Toxins 2023, 15(12), 677; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15120677 - 30 Nov 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2430
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether previous preventive treatment with onabotulinumtoxin-A might influence subsequent clinical response following a switch to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The present retrospective study was conducted at the Headache Centre—Neurology Clinic at the Spedali Civili [...] Read more.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether previous preventive treatment with onabotulinumtoxin-A might influence subsequent clinical response following a switch to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The present retrospective study was conducted at the Headache Centre—Neurology Clinic at the Spedali Civili Hospital of Brescia between November 2018 and May 2023. The primary objective was to assess clinical outcome (monthly headache days (MHDs), monthly migraine days (MMDs), mean analgesics consumption, and clinical disability according to Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS)) following three months (T3) of preventive treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs comparing patients who did and those who did not previously receive treatment with Onabotulinumtoxin-A. Moreover, we aimed to evaluate whether the clinical response to anti-CGRP mAbs was affected by the number of previous Onabotulinumtoxin-A administrations. At T3, compared to Onabotulinumtoxin-A naïve patients, patients who previously received Onabotulinumtoxin-A documented fewer MMDs (3.3 ± 3.7 versus 5.2 ± 5.0; p = 0.017) and a lower MIDAS score (23.2 ± 20.9 versus 37.4 ± 39.6; p = 0.013). Patients who received at least 3 onabotulinumtoxin-A administrations documented, at T3, lower MMDs compared to those who received fewer cycles (respectively, 2.1 ± 2.7 vs. 6.5 ± 4.4; p = 0.024). In conclusion, according to our data, previous treatment with onabotulinumtoxin-A might improve subsequent response to anti-CGRP mAbs preventive treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Botulinum Toxin and Migraine: Goals and Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1127 KiB  
Article
Migraine Disability Improvement during Treatment with Galcanezumab in Patients with Chronic and High Frequency Episodic Migraine
by Francesca Schiano di Cola, Marco Bolchini, Salvatore Caratozzolo, Giulia Ceccardi, Matteo Cortinovis, Paolo Liberini, Renata Rao and Alessandro Padovani
Neurol. Int. 2023, 15(1), 273-284; https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint15010017 - 13 Feb 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2959
Abstract
Background: The aim of the present study was to assess the migraine outcome, in particular migraine disability, in chronic (CM) and high frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) patients in treatment with galcanezumab. Methods: The present study was conducted at the Headache Centre of Spedali [...] Read more.
Background: The aim of the present study was to assess the migraine outcome, in particular migraine disability, in chronic (CM) and high frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) patients in treatment with galcanezumab. Methods: The present study was conducted at the Headache Centre of Spedali Civili of Brescia. Patients were treated with galcanezumab 120 mg monthly. Clinical and demographical information were collected at the baseline (T0). Data about outcome, analgesics consumption and disability (MIDAS and HIT-6 scores) were collected quarterly. Results: Fifty-four consecutive patients were enrolled. Thirty-seven patients had a diagnosis of CM, 17 of HFEM. During treatment, patients reported a significant reduction in terms of mean headache/migraine days (p < 0.001), the attacks’ pain intensity (p = 0.001) and monthly consumed analgesics (p < 0.001). The MIDAS and HIT-6 scores also documented a significant improvement (p < 0.001). At the baseline, all patients documented a severe degree of disability (MIDAS score ≥ 21). Following six months of treatment, only 29.2% of patients still documented a MIDAS score ≥ 21, with one third of patients documenting little or no disability. A > 50% MIDAS reduction, compared to baseline, was observed in up to 94.6% of patients, following the first three months of treatment. A similar outcome was found for HIT-6 scores. A significant positive correlation was found between headache days and MIDAS at T3 and T6 (T6 > T3), but not baseline. Discussion: Monthly prophylactic treatment with galcanezumab was found to be effective in both CM and HFEM, especially in reducing migraine burden and disability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Advances in Neurodegenerative Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 555 KiB  
Article
Magnetism Science with the Square Kilometre Array
by George Heald, Sui Ann Mao, Valentina Vacca, Takuya Akahori, Ancor Damas-Segovia, B. M. Gaensler, Matthias Hoeft, Ivan Agudo, Aritra Basu, Rainer Beck, Mark Birkinshaw, Annalisa Bonafede, Tyler L. Bourke, Andrea Bracco, Ettore Carretti, Luigina Feretti, J. M. Girart, Federica Govoni, James A. Green, JinLin Han, Marijke Haverkorn, Cathy Horellou, Melanie Johnston-Hollitt, Roland Kothes, Tom Landecker, Błażej Nikiel-Wroczyński, Shane P. O’Sullivan, Marco Padovani, Frédérick Poidevin, Luke Pratley, Marco Regis, Christopher John Riseley, Tim Robishaw, Lawrence Rudnick, Charlotte Sobey, Jeroen M. Stil, Xiaohui Sun, Sharanya Sur, A. Russ Taylor, Alec Thomson, Cameron L. Van Eck, Franco Vazza, Jennifer L. West and the SKA Magnetism Science Working Groupadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Galaxies 2020, 8(3), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies8030053 - 6 Jul 2020
Cited by 67 | Viewed by 7841
Abstract
The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) will answer fundamental questions about the origin, evolution, properties, and influence of magnetic fields throughout the Universe. Magnetic fields can illuminate and influence phenomena as diverse as star formation, galactic dynamics, fast radio bursts, active galactic nuclei, large-scale [...] Read more.
The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) will answer fundamental questions about the origin, evolution, properties, and influence of magnetic fields throughout the Universe. Magnetic fields can illuminate and influence phenomena as diverse as star formation, galactic dynamics, fast radio bursts, active galactic nuclei, large-scale structure, and dark matter annihilation. Preparations for the SKA are swiftly continuing worldwide, and the community is making tremendous observational progress in the field of cosmic magnetism using data from a powerful international suite of SKA pathfinder and precursor telescopes. In this contribution, we revisit community plans for magnetism research using the SKA, in light of these recent rapid developments. We focus in particular on the impact that new radio telescope instrumentation is generating, thus advancing our understanding of key SKA magnetism science areas, as well as the new techniques that are required for processing and interpreting the data. We discuss these recent developments in the context of the ultimate scientific goals for the SKA era. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Galactic Magnetism)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1406 KiB  
Review
Legislation for the Reuse of Biosolids on Agricultural Land in Europe: Overview
by Maria Cristina Collivignarelli, Alessandro Abbà, Andrea Frattarola, Marco Carnevale Miino, Sergio Padovani, Ioannis Katsoyiannis and Vincenzo Torretta
Sustainability 2019, 11(21), 6015; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216015 - 29 Oct 2019
Cited by 243 | Viewed by 15763
Abstract
The issues concerning the management of sewage sludge produced in wastewater treatment plants are becoming more important in Europe due to: (i) the modification of sludge quality (biological and chemical sludge are often mixed with negative impacts on sludge management, especially for land [...] Read more.
The issues concerning the management of sewage sludge produced in wastewater treatment plants are becoming more important in Europe due to: (i) the modification of sludge quality (biological and chemical sludge are often mixed with negative impacts on sludge management, especially for land application); (ii) the evolution of legislation (landfill disposal is banned in many European countries); and (iii) the technologies for energy and material recovery from sludge not being fully applied in all European Member States. Furthermore, Directive 2018/851/EC introduced the waste hierarchy that involved a new strategy with the prevention in waste production and the minimization of landfill disposal. In this context, biological sewage sludge can be treated in order to produce more stabilized residues: the biosolids. In some European countries, the reuse of biosolids as soil improver/fertilizer in arable crops represents the most used option. In order to control the quality of biosolids used for land application, every Member State has issued a national regulation based on the European directive. The aim of this work is to compare the different approaches provided by European Member States for the reuse of biosolids in agricultural soils. A focus on the regulation of countries that reuse significant amount of biosolids for land application was performed. Finally, a detailed study on Italian legislation both at national and regional levels is reported. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop