Vision

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance and safety of T2769 (Thealoz^® Total), a preservative-free eye drop combining 0.15% sodium hyaluronate, 3% trehalose, and 2.45% N-acetylaspartyl-glutamate (NAAGA), in contact lens wearers with dry eye symptoms and discomfort. This prospective, single-arm investigation enrolled 34 adult contact lens wearers with Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores ≥ 18 and Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8) scores ≥ 12. Patients instilled one drop of T2769 three to six times daily for 36 days. Performance assessments included CLDEQ-8, ocular discomfort and symptoms, OSDI, soothing sensation, and ocular signs. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), far BCVA, and ocular tolerance. CLDEQ-8 improved from the baseline at Day 36 (−12.6 ± 5.0; p < 0.001) and as early as D15, with similar improvements in ocular discomfort, OSDI, and total symptom score. Soothing sensation was judged important by 79.4% of patients at D36. Ocular surface staining, tear break-up time, and the Schirmer test improved at D15 and D36, while conjunctival hyperaemia improved in 82.4% of patients at D36. Two non-serious treatment-related AEs (photophobia and blurred vision) occurred in one patient. BCVA was unchanged, and tolerance was rated very satisfactory/satisfactory. In conclusion, T2769 was safe and effective for reducing contact lens-associated dry eyes and discomfort.

Background/Objectives: Early detection and timely treatment of amblyopia require reliable visual acuity testing in toddlers; however, conventional Landolt ring charts often show poor testability in 2–3-year-old children. Therefore, we aimed to verify the practicality of a new Child-Friendly Minimum-Separable (CFMS) chart for 2–3-year-old children by comparing cooperation rates with the standard Landolt ring visual acuity chart. Methods: A prospective pilot study was conducted on 20 children aged 2 years (30.6 ± 3.2 months) and 20 children aged 3 years (41.8 ± 3.9 months). Right-eye visual acuity was tested in random order using the Landolt ring (four options, 3/5 considered correct) and the CFMS chart (two options, 3/3 considered correct). Test cooperation rates and visual acuity were analyzed. Results: In the 2-year-olds, the cooperation rate was 15% and 75% for the Landolt ring and CFMS chart, respectively (p = 0.0005). Twelve children refused to cooperate with the Landolt ring but cooperated with the CFMS chart; the reverse did not occur. In the 3-year-olds, the cooperation rate was 60% and 90% for the Landolt ring and CFMS chart, respectively (p = 0.031); six children cooperated only with the CFMS chart. The odds ratio for cooperation per additional month of age was 1.34 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12–1.59; p = 0.001) and 1.24 (95% CI: 1.03–1.50; p = 0.026) for the Landolt ring and CFMS chart, respectively. Conclusions: Compared to the Landolt ring, the CFMS chart significantly improves cooperation rates for visual acuity testing in 2−3-year-old children, especially among 2-year-olds.

This study investigated the functional visual impact of simulated astigmatic blur using cylindrical powers of 0.50 D, 1.00 D, and 2.00 D, applied in against-the-rule (ATR), with-the-rule (WTR), and oblique (OBL) axes, in adults aged 18 to 35 years with no known ocular disease. Forty-five young adults were randomly divided into three groups (n = 15). Binocular best-corrected visual acuity (distance and near) was recorded in logMAR using the ETDRS acuity chart at 5 m and 40 cm, supported by acuity optotypes displayed in a Bailey–Lovie chart format. Depth-fusion and disparity discrimination were measured using polarized stereopsis thresholds with the Randot^® Stereo Test from Stereo Optical Company, Inc. Reading performance was quantified as a continuous binocular rate metric (words per minute) using the validated Portuguese digital reading curve provided by the MNREAD iPad App by Precision Vision at 40 cm. The results were preserved verbatim as follows: Distance and near BCVA were significantly affected by ATR astigmatisms (−0.50 + 1.00 90°, −1.00 + 2.00 90°), WTR astigmatisms (−0.25 + 0.50 180°, −0.50 + 1.00 180°, −1.00 + 2.00 180°), and OBL astigmatisms (OD: −0.25 + 0.50 45°, OS: −0.25 + 0.50 135°; OD: −0.50 + 1.00 45°, OS: −0.50 + 1.00 135°; OD: −1.00 + 2.00 45°, OS: −1.00 + 2.00 135°). Stereopsis was significantly influenced by high-power OBL astigmatism (−1.00 + 2.00). Reading rate was also negatively impacted by OBL astigmatisms ≥1.00 D. Simulated astigmatism of different powers and axes reduced high-contrast distance and near BCVA, stereopsis, and reading speed in adults aged 18–35 years. Higher-power astigmatism, particularly along oblique axes, caused the most significant functional impairment.