Sexual Violence in University Settings

A Special Issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 12 December 2026 | Viewed by 2975

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Interests: violence among young couples and sexual violence; gender stereotypes; perception of abusive behaviour, consent, prevention through educational programmes

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Interests: violence in young people's relationships; educational proposals for the prevention of violence; education in values; socio-educational intervention in contexts of violence

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
Interests: family relations; family mediation; impact of ecological issues on family relationships; impact of family relationships on members’ pro-environmental behaviours
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Interests: intergenerational education; education for older people; violence; socio-educational intervention; qualitative methodology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The aim of this Special Issue is to analyse the complex subject of sexual violence in universities. Using different approaches and methodologies, we seek to deepen our knowledge and understanding of this phenomenon as a basis for designing public policies, programmes and projects for its prevention.

Since the 1980s, when Mary Koss revealed that up to one in four female university students had been the victim of rape or attempted rape—introducing the concept of “date rape” in her work on the topic—research on sexual violence in the university setting has advanced via use of various methodologies, behavioural questionnaires, qualitative interviews, and institutional analyses. Sexual violence has come to be recognised as a structural and cultural problem, and current lines of research include studies on prevalence and risk factors such as gender, LGBTIQ+ identity, disability, alcohol consumption, and membership in fraternities or sports teams. In addition, universities tend to have low reporting rates because victims feel fear, shame, or mistrust of the institution, not to mention they show more symptoms of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, school dropout, or decreased performance associated with this type of violence.

Given the persistence of a culture of silence and minimisation of violence, an intervention is needed that combines prevention, care, and justice focused on victims. Such an intervention would ideally involve using qualitative methods to collect subjective experiences, analysing the role of academic and administrative staff, including trans and non-binary people as a study population, and incorporating public health and human rights approaches.

Prof. Dr. Gracia González-Gijón
Prof. Dr. Andrés Soriano-Díaz
Dr. Claudia Chiarolanza
Dr. Nazaret Martínez-Heredia
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sexual violence
  • acquaintance rape
  • prevalence
  • consent
  • restorative justice
  • reparation for harm
  • university women
  • sexual assault
  • offender accountability

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 458 KB  
Article
When the Myth Justifies Violence: Acceptance of Sexual Aggression Myths and Ambivalent Sexism Among University Students
by José Jesús González Chía, Gracia González-Gijón, Andrés Soriano Díaz and Nazaret Martínez-Heredia
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15010016 - 29 Dec 2025
Viewed by 1863
Abstract
This study addresses the persistence of gender inequalities among university students by analysing the acceptance of modern myths about sexual assault and ambivalent sexism in the academic context. These beliefs, although subtle or socially accepted, contribute to the normalisation of sexual violence and [...] Read more.
This study addresses the persistence of gender inequalities among university students by analysing the acceptance of modern myths about sexual assault and ambivalent sexism in the academic context. These beliefs, although subtle or socially accepted, contribute to the normalisation of sexual violence and hinder progress towards real equality. The aim of this research was to analyse the presence of these attitudes among students at the University of Granada and to examine their relationship according to gender. A quantitative, descriptive and cross-sectional design was used with a sample of 210 students. Data were collected using the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) and the Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression Scale (AMMSA-21) and analysed using descriptive statistics, correlations and non-parametric tests. The results show greater acceptance of myths and sexist attitudes among men, as well as a positive correlation between ambivalent sexism (hostile and benevolent) and acceptance of myths. These findings confirm the persistence of symbolic justifications for sexual violence in the university setting. The study concludes by highlighting the need for preventive educational interventions and institutional strategies that promote equality and consent. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sexual Violence in University Settings)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

20 pages, 342 KB  
Review
Theorizing Campus Sexual Violence: Insights from the Evolution of Campus Responses
by Karma Rose Zavita and Gabriel Alvarez
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(9), 641; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15090641 (registering DOI) - 19 Sep 2026
Abstract
Campus sexual violence has been the subject of more than five decades of research, yet prevention on college campuses has repeatedly failed to reflect what feminist theory and scholarship offered as the causes of violence. This historically organized narrative review traces how feminist [...] Read more.
Campus sexual violence has been the subject of more than five decades of research, yet prevention on college campuses has repeatedly failed to reflect what feminist theory and scholarship offered as the causes of violence. This historically organized narrative review traces how feminist theory, empirical research, prevention programming, and institutional policy co-evolved from the 1970s to the early 2020s. We argue that a persistent pattern runs through this history. Feminist scholarship increasingly located sexual violence in power, patriarchy, intersectionality, and structural inequality, and empirical research increasingly examined perpetrators’ attitudes and the rape-supportive beliefs that sustain violence alongside prevalence and individual risk. Yet campus prevention rarely built on this work. As prevention strategies shifted from women’s self-defense to consent education, rape myth reduction, and bystander intervention, they continued to place responsibility on individual students rather than the beliefs and structural conditions that enable gendered violence. Given what both feminist theory and empirical research had already established, these represent missed opportunities for prevention capable of addressing the structural causes of campus sexual violence. We conclude by calling for a research and prevention agenda grounded in feminist criminology. This locates the causes of campus sexual violence in gendered power, institutional conditions, and structural inequality rather than in the behaviors of those most likely to be harmed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sexual Violence in University Settings)
Back to TopTop