Reshaping Social Reality: Digital Societies and the Data-Based Approach

A special issue of Societies (ISSN 2075-4698).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 28 February 2026 | Viewed by 3373

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Political Science and Communication, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
Interests: social research methodology; digital social research; innovative approaches in social research methods; digital inequalities; digital addictions

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Social Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Napoli, Italy
Interests: social research methodology; digital social research; innovative approaches in social research methods; communication analysis
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Digital technologies and data-driven approaches are reshaping the landscape of modern societies. From social interactions to policy-making, the influence of big data and algorithmic decision-making has penetrated nearly all facets of human life. This special issue, Reshaping Social Reality: Digital Societies and the Data-Based Approach, explores the deep changes in social structures, behaviours, and realities brought about by the emergence of the so-called digital age.

The purpose of this issue is to critically examine how Data-Based methodologies and digital technologies are transforming traditional social science domains such as sociology, social statistics, anthropology, social psychology, economy, marketing, organization, history, philosophy, social engineering, STS studies, and related disciplines. By engaging with both theoretical and empirical work, this issue will explore the consequences of data-driven technologies on social research, governance, public discourse, and everyday life. We welcome contributions that address the opportunities, challenges, and biases that accompany the rise of digital societies from a social science perspective.

We invite submissions on a wide range of topics related to digital societies and the data-based approach, including but not limited to:

  • Digital Data and Social Theory: Examining how big data and algorithms reshape foundational social theories and concepts.
  • Algorithmic Governance and Social Control: Investigating how algorithms are used in governance, from social media moderation to public policy and surveillance.
  • The Role of Digital Platforms in Shaping Social Identities and Choices: Exploring how online platforms shape identities.
  • Ethics of Data-Driven Research: Addressing the ethical challenges posed by the widespread use of digital data in social research.
  • Digital Inequalities and Access to Technology: Analyzing how digital tools exacerbate or mitigate social inequalities.
  • Data Quality and Bias in Digital Social Research: Investigating methodological challenges in ensuring data quality and reducing bias in digital social research.
  • Big Data and Public Opinion: Exploring how data-driven processes shape public opinion, misinformation, and polarization in digital societies.
  • The Impact of AI and Machine Learning on Social Dynamics: Examining how AI-driven tools affect interpersonal relationships, communities, and institutions.
  • Digital Labor and the Data Economy: Assessing the implications of digital technologies for labor markets, gig work, and the commodification of data.
  • Data-Driven Policy for Sustainable Development: Exploring the role of digital data in fostering more sustainable, equitable policy-making across sectors like tourism and urban development.

We welcome papers from a broad range of disciplines, including sociology, social statistics, political science, digital humanities, and related fields. Submissions should offer original research or theoretical contributions that critically engage with the theme of digital societies and the data-based approach.

  1. The digital transformation of society has generated an unprecedented amount of data, offering new opportunities and challenges for social research. As we move into an era where data-driven methodologies influence not only scientific inquiry but also social realities themselves, it becomes crucial to critically assess the intersection of data, technology, and society. This special issue aims at exploring the scientific background of this intersection, with a focus on how digital societies reshape traditional social science concepts like identity, inequality, and governance.
  2. The goal of this special issue is to bring together diverse perspectives from sociology, social statistics, and related fields to analyze the impact of data-based approaches on social research. By focusing on both theoretical insights and empirical studies, we hope to highlight the significance of this topic for understanding contemporary social dynamics and for advancing the methodological tools used in social research.
  3. We encourage submissions on the following themes:
    • Epistemological and methodological challenges in data-driven social research;
    • The ethics of digital data usage in social sciences;
    • Digital inequalities and the societal impact of new technologies;
    • Algorithmic governance and its implications for democracy;
    • Data quality and bias in social statistics.

We look forward to your contributions that will help deepen our understanding of how digital societies and data-driven methodologies are reshaping the social world.

In this Special Issue, Contributions have to follow one of the three categories of papers, article, conceptual paper or review, of the journal and address the topic of the special issue.

Prof. Dr. Felice Addeo
Dr. Gabriella Punziano
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as conceptual papers are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Societies is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • digital society
  • innovative approaches in social research methods
  • digital social research
  • data-based approach
  • algorithmic governance
  • social inequalities
  • digital inequalities
  • ethics in digital research
  • digital addictions

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

20 pages, 472 KiB  
Article
Popular Habitus: Updating the Concept of “Habitus” as a Guide for the Selection of Cases of Analysis in Qualitative Digital Research
by Roberto Graziano
Societies 2025, 15(6), 150; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15060150 - 28 May 2025
Viewed by 1088
Abstract
This research proposes an update of the use of the concept of “habitus”. In continuity with Wacquant, I suggest using habitus not only as an object of investigation, but also as a methodological tool, reintroducing it for qualitative studies of digital sociology. Additionally, [...] Read more.
This research proposes an update of the use of the concept of “habitus”. In continuity with Wacquant, I suggest using habitus not only as an object of investigation, but also as a methodological tool, reintroducing it for qualitative studies of digital sociology. Additionally, it can be used as an analytical tool to guide the selection of cases of analysis in empirical research. The aim of this study is to provide researchers with a methodological tool in their toolbox that can apply categorizations that can guide the entire research process to interpret social differences and, consequently, the positions that subjects occupy in the social field through critical reconstruction. This study intends to use the concept of habitus, taking the following scheme into account: [(habitus)·(capital) + Field] = practice. However, the scheme is updated through the use of new indicators that are suitable for describing and categorizing subjects and their hybrid interaction in digital platforms, as well as in autochthonous contexts. For this reason, this study has provided an integration of new forms of capital with the classic ones identified by Bourdieu. In this study, habitus will be defined as “popular habitus”, i.e., a rigorous effort that is useful for finding the tools capable of determining which subjects are symbolically categorized in a “popular” representation of the self and in their practical predispositions, as well as which are not. Furthermore, through empirical examples, the capacity of the tool to understand the interaction between digital platforms and social subjects is highlighted, as well as the way in which this interaction contributes to shaping identities and social choices. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1910 KiB  
Article
AI Response Quality in Public Services: Temperature Settings and Contextual Factors
by Domenico Trezza, Giuseppe Luca De Luca Picione and Carmine Sergianni
Societies 2025, 15(5), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15050127 - 6 May 2025
Viewed by 528
Abstract
This study investigated how generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems—now increasingly integrated into public services—respond to different technical configurations, and how these configurations affect the perceived quality of the outputs. Drawing on an experimental evaluation of Govern-AI, a chatbot designed for professionals in [...] Read more.
This study investigated how generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems—now increasingly integrated into public services—respond to different technical configurations, and how these configurations affect the perceived quality of the outputs. Drawing on an experimental evaluation of Govern-AI, a chatbot designed for professionals in the social, educational, and labor sectors, we analyzed the impact of the temperature parameter—which controls the degree of creativity and variability in the responses—on two key dimensions: accuracy and comprehensibility. This analysis was based on 8880 individual evaluations collected from five professional profiles. The findings revealed the following: (1) the high-temperature responses were generally more comprehensible and appreciated, yet less accurate in strategically sensitive contexts; (2) professional groups differed significantly in their assessments, where trade union representatives and regional policy staff expressed more critical views than the others; (3) the type of question—whether operational or informational—significantly influenced the perceived output quality. This study demonstrated that the AI performance was far from neutral: it depended on technical settings, usage contexts, and the profiles of the end users. Investigating these “behind-the-scenes” dynamics is essential for fostering the informed governance of AI in public services, and for avoiding the risk of technology functioning as an opaque black box within decision-making processes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

12 pages, 214 KiB  
Review
User Spatial Content in Social Research: Approaches, Opportunities, and Challenges
by Ciro Clemente De Falco
Societies 2025, 15(4), 96; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15040096 - 8 Apr 2025
Viewed by 433
Abstract
The availability of user-generated spatial data (user spatial content, USC) has transformed social science research, enabling the real-time, large-scale exploration of socio-spatial dynamics. This article traces the evolution from volunteered geographic information (VGI) to USC, highlighting their multidimensional nature and epistemological significance. Brief [...] Read more.
The availability of user-generated spatial data (user spatial content, USC) has transformed social science research, enabling the real-time, large-scale exploration of socio-spatial dynamics. This article traces the evolution from volunteered geographic information (VGI) to USC, highlighting their multidimensional nature and epistemological significance. Brief examples underscore USC’s potential for capturing the interplay between territorial factors, digital activity, and social phenomena, ranging from mapping urban vitality to tracking large-scale crises. However, the recent tightening of data access in the post-API era demands a rethinking of research approaches. Alternatives such as data donation, dedicated applications, and geoparsing can maintain the viability of USC-driven analyses. Overall, this article underlines the need for diversified, ethical, and methodologically sound strategies to harness USC’s value in understanding the digitally intertwined realities of contemporary society. Full article
Back to TopTop