Social Environmental Factors of anti/Prosocial Behaviour Development: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges

A special issue of Societies (ISSN 2075-4698).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2025) | Viewed by 5261

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal
Interests: positive and negative life experiences; lifespan development; protective factors; physical and psychological health; anti and prosocial behavior; coping strategies
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Research has shown that both anti- and prosocial behavior may be highly impacted by social and environmental factors that contribute to both as a risk or protective factor. Most research until now has focused on social environmental variables as risk factors, analyzing different levels, such as family, peers, intimate relationships, and communities, and especially how they are related to antisocial behavior. Less attention has been paid to the protective role of social environmental factors and their implications for prosocial behavior development. Both risk and protective factors must be considered while designing primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention programs. This research area impacts all levels of Bronfenbrenner’s biopsychosocial ecological model, with implications for physical and mental health, education/job performance, offending and victimization, and economics.

Thus, the aim of this Special Issue is to compile original and emerging works in the field of social environment factors of anti/prosocial behavior development, allowing for a comprehensive and deeper understanding of the topic. Relying on multidisciplinary perspectives, this Special Issue of Societies will enhance the knowledge about challenges, risks, and opportunities for antisocial or prosocial behavior development, inspiring future studies and providing insights for different professionals (e.g., health professionals, school professionals, justice system professionals) and policymakers.

Research on these topics is welcomed:

  • Social environmental factors as a risk factor for the development of antisocial behavior development;
  • Social environmental factors as a protective factor for the development of prosocial behavior development;
  • The presentation and assessment of intervention programs targeted to promote prosocial behavior and minimize/decrease antisocial behaviors, including social environmental factors;
  • The interplay between antisocial and prosocial behavior development in a life-course perspective;
  • Development, validation, and/or cultural adaptation of measures of antisocial and prosocial behavior and/or social environmental factors.

In this Special Issue, contributions must fall under one of three paper categories of this journal—article, conceptual paper, or review—and must address the topic of the Special Issue.

Dr. Vanessa Azevedo
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as conceptual papers are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Societies is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • social environmental factors
  • risk factors
  • protective factors
  • antisocial behavior development
  • prosocial behavior development
  • lifespan perspective
  • family
  • peers
  • intimate partners
  • community

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 288 KB  
Article
Beyond Parental Behavioral Control: The Mediating Role of Child Disclosure in Adolescent Externalizing Problems
by Annis Lai Chu Fung and Han Yu Liu
Societies 2026, 16(2), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16020062 - 13 Feb 2026
Viewed by 670
Abstract
Externalizing problems are influenced by family dynamics, yet the specific mechanisms linking parental control to distinct externalizing problem behaviors remain unclear. This study examined the effects of parental behavioral control on proactive aggression, reactive aggression, and delinquent behavior, focusing on the mediating role [...] Read more.
Externalizing problems are influenced by family dynamics, yet the specific mechanisms linking parental control to distinct externalizing problem behaviors remain unclear. This study examined the effects of parental behavioral control on proactive aggression, reactive aggression, and delinquent behavior, focusing on the mediating role of child disclosure. Data were collected from 3818 adolescents (aged 10–18) and their parents in Hong Kong. Results revealed that child disclosure served as a robust mediator. For mothers, full mediation was observed across all three outcomes. For fathers, full mediation was found for both subtypes of aggression, whereas partial mediation was observed for delinquent behavior. The indirect pathways were invariant across gender, suggesting the mechanism is universal. Notably, the model significantly predicted reactive aggression through a full mediation model from both mother and father. The study highlights the unique dual-pathway role of fathers—combining structural deterrence for delinquent behavior with relational communication for aggression and supports the efficacy of trust-based interventions for diverse externalizing problems. These findings suggest that effective parenting operates primarily by fostering a disclosure-promoting context rather than mere surveillance. Full article
19 pages, 792 KB  
Article
Reimagining Professional Associations in Disrupted Research Systems: A Hybrid Governance Model and Lessons from Indonesia
by Syahrir Ika, Badrun Susantyo, Agus Fanar Syukri, Abdul Wachid Syamroni, Destika Cahyana, Sari Intan Kailaku, Sri Djangkung Sumbogo Murti, R. Siti Zuhro, Haznan Abimanyu, Deni Shidqi Khaerudini, Ahyar Ahyar, Irma Himmatul Aliyyah and Anggita Tresliyana Suryana
Societies 2026, 16(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16010017 - 5 Jan 2026
Viewed by 1914
Abstract
This study investigates the institutional transformations within Indonesia’s research ecosystem, focusing on the impacts of the National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) establishment and the subsequent Work From Office (WFO) policy on the Association of Indonesian Researchers (PPI). The research aims to evaluate [...] Read more.
This study investigates the institutional transformations within Indonesia’s research ecosystem, focusing on the impacts of the National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) establishment and the subsequent Work From Office (WFO) policy on the Association of Indonesian Researchers (PPI). The research aims to evaluate these impacts and propose an adaptive institutional revitalization model. Employing a mixed-methods approach, a total of 150 online questionnaires were distributed across 21 regional branches of PPI between February and March 2025. Of these, 87 were completed and valid for analysis, representing a 58% response rate. Findings reveal that the WFO policy has led to a significant decline in member participation, coordination difficulties across regions, and weakened collaboration with local partners such as regional governments and universities. A SWOT analysis of three revitalization options—full agglomeration, bounded agglomeration, and non-BRIN integration—identified a hybrid model as the most adaptive and widely supported alternative (41.5%). This hybrid model combines selective structural efficiency with inclusive membership expansion, aiming to preserve regional identity, enhance collaboration, and strengthen organizational legitimacy. The study offers key insights for developing adaptive governance frameworks rooted in epistemic justice, digital accountability, and cross-sectoral collaboration, applicable to professional organizations navigating decentralization and institutional disruption. The proposed hybrid model serves as a strategic reference for achieving organizational resilience and fostering a more inclusive national innovation ecosystem. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 549 KB  
Article
Effect of the Perception of Others’ Status on Prosocial Behavior Prestige and Domination in Trust
by Edwin Oswaldo Gil-Mateus, Milton Samuel Camelo-Rincón and Jaime Edison Rojas-Mora
Societies 2025, 15(11), 311; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15110311 - 11 Nov 2025
Viewed by 1929
Abstract
This study examines the link between how people perceive others’ social status and prosocial behavior, viewing the latter as a key aspect of social and cooperative interactions. Due to conflicting findings in previous research, this study investigates how status acquisition strategies—such as prestige [...] Read more.
This study examines the link between how people perceive others’ social status and prosocial behavior, viewing the latter as a key aspect of social and cooperative interactions. Due to conflicting findings in previous research, this study investigates how status acquisition strategies—such as prestige or dominance—impact prosocial choices, particularly when perceptions of others’ status vary. To achieve this, a pre-experimental study was conducted with 261 university students, who participated in a modified trust game where they decided whether to give and expect money back from individuals they perceived as higher, equal, or lower in status. The study also measured perceptions of dominance, prestige, and exposure to life shocks. The main result shows that, unexpectedly, prestige does not directly predict prosocial behavior, while dominance does when interacting with lower-status individuals. Additionally, external shocks have mixed effects on prosocial behavior. These findings suggest that prosocial behavior is not solely determined by status but also depends on strategic perceptions, relational context, and past experiences, which have important implications for understanding leadership, cooperation, and social cohesion. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop