Embedding Public Participation in Planning, Governance and Climate Action: A Cross-Disciplinary Overview

A special issue of Societies (ISSN 2075-4698).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2024) | Viewed by 7590

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Center for Social Studies, Coimbra University, 3000-995 Coimbra, Portugal
Interests: citizens participation; democratic innovations; decentralization; city networks; platform economy; environmental changes; North-South and South-South Cooperation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Social Psychology, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain
Interests: educational effects of citizens participation; democratic innovations; the application of social psychology to the study and design of participation processes

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Over the last two decades, interest in processes of democratic renewal and innovation based on citizens’ involvement in public affairs has been growing among researchers, public decision-makers, activists, and a different range of organizations that have been interested in intensifying the deliberative functioning of our democracies (Floridia, 2017) and in fostering higher degrees of effectiveness for policies and projects aimed at tackling societal, environmental and cultural challenges in our interconnected world. These processes encompass a wide range of initiatives, practices and experimentations, including mini-publics, forms of collaborative governance, participatory budgeting, new ways of managing referendums and citizens' initiatives, as well as digital participatory innovations (Elstub and Escobar, 2019), which are able to consolidate a dialogue between bottom-up forms of civic organization and “spaces by invitation” shaped by institutions (Bussu and Bua, 2023; Blas and Ibarra, 2006; Gaventa, 2005). Initially, many of these processes had a mere local focus; however, they have since tended to scale up to different levels of public administrations, gaining a growing presence even in supranational experiences, particularly in Europe. Some isolated pilot processes have even evolved into combinations of various democratic innovations that configure multichannel systems of participation and deliberation (Spada and Allegretti, 2020), often supported by digital technology.

This expansion has led to a greater understanding of citizens’ participation as vital to people's development. As a result, participatory and deliberative processes have been integrated into educational centers and other training spaces, enabling people to understand political participation beyond the simple act of casting a vote in recurrent elections of representative institutions.

The growth of participatory and deliberative processes has been made possible by the continuous relationship and mutual feedback interchanged between public administrations, researchers and practitioners. With a slower pace, political theory and legislative/regulatory frameworks have also changed, thus contributing to the better embedding and redefining of these practices through incorporating the empirical feedback provided by ongoing studies.

However, despite the broad field of research and experimentation, a lack of reflection on the plurality of possible approaches to participatory and deliberative processes from different disciplines and standpoints remains; a transdisciplinary approach to the topic is still a long way off. Moreover, various limitations and problems have been pointed out by theoreticians, researchers, facilitators that require new “consequentialist” (Fung, 2011) and “holistic” approaches: the reduced perceived legitimacy and authoritativeness of many participatory experiences, their difficulty in achieving effectiveness, inclusiveness and high degrees of transparency and responsiveness, their decreased levels of embeddedness in the governance systems, and their consequences in terms of limited impacts, cooptation, time-consumption, and the participatory fatigue of target audiences, etc.

Given this overview, this Special Issue aims to provide a snapshot of the current state of studies and initiatives of participation and deliberation that can contribute to improving democracy and people's quality of life through interdisciplinary collaboration.

The main aims of this Special Issue are:

  1. To gather the current state of the theoretical and empirical debate around democratic innovations, taking into account theories of complexity and holistic views;
  2. To activate collective reflection on the near future of democratic innovations;
  3. To promote dialogue between disciplines in the field of democratic innovations.

We encourage the submission of original articles, theoretical or empirical, on the following topics (though these are not exhaustive):

  1. Participatory and deliberative systems;
  2. The dialogue between direct democracy and forms of participatory and deliberative innovations;
  3. Involving citizens in decision-making processes beyond “the local trap”, especially on regional, national or supranational scales;
  4. Rethinking the digital platforms and the role of technology in blended, participatory innovations beyond their merely instrumental dimension;
  5. Participation throughout the life cycle and its pedagogic and transformative contributions to changing individuals and groups;
  6. Designing effective deliberative processes to tackle complex issues, such as those relating to environmental transitions;
  7. Measuring and evaluating the outcomes of participatory/deliberative processes;
  8. Structural and conjunctural problems and limitations of democratic innovations in relation to their incrementally evolutionary nature.

In this Special Issue, contributions must follow one of the three categories of papers, articles, conceptual papers or reviews in this journal and address the topic of the Special Issue.

A maximum 500-word abstract must be submitted by 15 January 2024. Once the abstract successfully passes the initial review, the full manuscript can be submitted by 31 March 2024. These articles will undergo double-blind peer review.

We hope you will be interested in submitting an article to this Special Issue.

Dr. Giovanni Allegretti
Prof. Dr. Patricia García-Leiva
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as conceptual papers are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Societies is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • democratic innovations
  • participatory and deliberative democracy
  • governance
  • participatory systems
  • citizens’ engagement
  • inter- and trans-disciplinary dialogue
  • transformative practices

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

14 pages, 790 KiB  
Article
Can Trust in Climate-Skeptical Governments Inhibit Pro-Environmental Action? Implications for Public Participation and Democratic Innovations
by Mirko Duradoni, Franca Paola Severino, Gabriele Neri, Maria Fiorenza, Norma Lindemann, Luisa Puddu and Andrea Guazzini
Societies 2025, 15(2), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15020026 - 31 Jan 2025
Viewed by 798
Abstract
In the scientific literature, being a woman and citizens’ trust are factors that are often linked to a higher frequency of pro-environmental behaviors. However, when a government adopts a skeptical narrative on climate change, describing natural disasters as mere ’tragedies’, extreme weather events [...] Read more.
In the scientific literature, being a woman and citizens’ trust are factors that are often linked to a higher frequency of pro-environmental behaviors. However, when a government adopts a skeptical narrative on climate change, describing natural disasters as mere ’tragedies’, extreme weather events as ’bad weather’, and simplifying climate change to ’unpredictable weather’, does citizens’ trust still serve as a factor that promotes pro-environmental behaviors? This study aimed to conduct a sex-sensitive analysis of the relationship between trust in the current Italian government (i.e., Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni) and pro-environmental behaviors related to conservation, transportation, environmental citizenship, and food consumption in a sample of 501 Italian citizens (65.1% cisgender women). This study reveals that greater trust in a climate-skeptical government is associated with lower implementation of pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs) and that this effect is less pronounced among women compared to men. These results highlight the importance of considering citizen’s trust in public participation, particularly in contexts where governmental narratives do not favor pro-environmental policies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 248 KiB  
Article
Using the Conference on the Future of Europe to Consider a Multilingual Continental Deliberative Model
by Lionel Cordier
Societies 2025, 15(2), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15020024 - 31 Jan 2025
Viewed by 924
Abstract
This article examines the linguistic and political dimensions of deliberation at a transnational level, using the Conference on the Future of Europe (CoFoE) as a case study. The CoFoE, held from 2021 to 2022, involved European citizens deliberating in 24 official languages of [...] Read more.
This article examines the linguistic and political dimensions of deliberation at a transnational level, using the Conference on the Future of Europe (CoFoE) as a case study. The CoFoE, held from 2021 to 2022, involved European citizens deliberating in 24 official languages of the European Union. This multilingual setting provides insights into the challenges and opportunities of fostering a multilingual continental democracy. While the European Parliament’s translation services were largely effective, the study reveals how linguistic diversity can both enhance and impede deliberative processes. By comparing the CoFoE with other multilingual forums such as the European Social Forum and traditional European Parliament deliberations, this paper explores the implications of multilingualism on participatory mechanisms and democratic engagement in the EU. This research employs an ethnographic methodology grounded in non-participant observations conducted during Panel 2 of the Conference on the Future of Europe, focusing on field notes, video recordings, and a live interpretation to document the dynamics of deliberative exchanges. The approach aimed to capture the diversity of interactions in plenary sessions and smaller discussion groups. The findings highlight the complex interplay between language use, political representation, and social inclusion, and suggest that true multilingual deliberation requires more than just technical translation services; it demands a commitment to linguistic equity and the accommodation of diverse voices. Full article
17 pages, 2608 KiB  
Article
Playing for the Planet? A Serious Game Approach to Land Use Planning with Students in Rural Iceland
by Benjamin D. Hennig, Ben F. Roberts, Johannes T. Welling, Marissa Pinal and Jón Ólafsson
Societies 2025, 15(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010014 - 16 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1272
Abstract
Effective nature conservation and citizen participation are essential for sustainable development and biodiversity preservation. This paper introduces the ‘Land Use Game’, a prototype serious game designed to engage citizens—particularly younger demographics—in participatory land use planning. Developed within the context of the EU Horizon [...] Read more.
Effective nature conservation and citizen participation are essential for sustainable development and biodiversity preservation. This paper introduces the ‘Land Use Game’, a prototype serious game designed to engage citizens—particularly younger demographics—in participatory land use planning. Developed within the context of the EU Horizon 2020 PHOENIX project, the game was tested with students in two rural Icelandic municipalities as part of a pilot study. The game enables participants to assign land use preferences through interactive mapping, supporting a better understanding of land use complexities while promoting active learning and dialogue. The study evaluates the game’s feasibility, technological features, and practical applications, highlighting insights from gameplay observations, participant feedback, and spatial analysis. The results demonstrate the potential of serious games to collect meaningful data, support inclusive decision-making, and empower citizens to contribute to sustainable policies. By incorporating such tools, planners can enhance public understanding, promote equitable land use, and strengthen participatory democracy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 704 KiB  
Article
Rebuilding Participatory Institutions in Brazil: The PPA Participativo Between Corporate Demands and Climate and Animal Rights
by Priscila Delgado de Carvalho, Priscila Zanandrez and Diego Matheus de Menezes
Societies 2025, 15(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010002 - 24 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1160
Abstract
In 2023, Brazil regained momentum in proposing innovative participatory institutions by launching a complex participatory experiment for budget planning within its “Multiannual Plan” (PPA). While this was not a scaled-up version of the local participatory budgeting plan that emerged decades earlier, its launch [...] Read more.
In 2023, Brazil regained momentum in proposing innovative participatory institutions by launching a complex participatory experiment for budget planning within its “Multiannual Plan” (PPA). While this was not a scaled-up version of the local participatory budgeting plan that emerged decades earlier, its launch did reopen the debate on the possibilities of expanding political participation. The challenge was significant due to the intricate nature of budget planning and the complexity of the plan’s participatory design. This paper examines that experience by outlining the institutional design of the PPA Participativo and analyzing its results in terms of online participation. It also discusses the prominence of climate-related proposals, suggesting that the PPA Participativo serves as a relevant indicator of national concerns regarding climate-based issues. Building on previous experiences, the PPA Participativo is a strategy consisting of three layers: an online platform for digital participation, state-level meetings with civil society activists, and a high-level forum composed of members from national councils. This paper analyses some of the results from the online platform, which recorded 4 million visits from 1.5 million individual participants. These citizens were invited to submit proposals, vote for up to three proposals, and choose from a set of pre-designed government programs. The main concerns that emerged from this open-ended process included corporate demands, stemming from highly organized sectors, such as public health and education employees. However, animal rights also ranked among the most-voted proposals. The program of the Ministry of the Environment on climate change reached the top position in this segment, largely due to its strong campaigning strategy. This paper discusses these outcomes, drawing on evidence of both societal engagement and institutional activism to promote specific agendas. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

24 pages, 1860 KiB  
Review
Exploring the Presence and Absence of Academic Discourse on Public Participation in the European Green Deal: A Central and Eastern European Perspective
by Gyula Nagy, Soma Ádám Heiner and Zoltán Kovács
Societies 2025, 15(3), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15030049 - 20 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 689
Abstract
The European Green Deal (EGD), a complex policy program meant to address climate change and ensure a “just, fair and inclusive” transition into a more sustainable and greener Europe, was launched by the EU in 2019. It was clear from the very beginning [...] Read more.
The European Green Deal (EGD), a complex policy program meant to address climate change and ensure a “just, fair and inclusive” transition into a more sustainable and greener Europe, was launched by the EU in 2019. It was clear from the very beginning that the opportunities and costs of the ambitious green transition would be very uneven geographically, not only within the EU but also among its regions and locations. Regions with higher environmental stress and/or less technological and economic capacities will inevitably be disadvantaged. The EGD requires large-scale public acceptance, which comes with democratic innovations and participative practices, which are less embedded in many regions. The former socialist bloc still struggles today with establishing decent levels of public participation, as well as with adopting and implementing democratic community principles in practice. The main aim of this paper is twofold. On the one hand, we intend to give an assessment of where Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries stand in the process of the green transition and what the major focus areas affecting them are, based on the existing academic literature. On the other hand, we intend to give a clear overview of the causes for and aspects of the weakness of civil society in the post-communist bloc and reasons why the adaptation of democratic innovations is lagging in this region. For this purpose, a systematic literature search and bibliometric analysis was performed based on articles indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases. Altogether, 172 articles published in the region were filtered and systematically analyzed according to the main themes of the papers related to the EGD. Research findings show that the interests of researchers in CEE countries largely differ from those in the mainstream academic discourse. Research topics, high on the agenda in Western countries, are hardly present in the academic discourse in CEE countries. On the other hand, issues like energy efficiency, urbanization’s impacts on green growth and renewable energy development, and innovations towards a circular economy dominate the research agenda. This region started the green transition process with major handicaps compared to the West, connected to path dependency and the legacy of socialist structures. The paper analyses the bibliometric aspects of articles published on these topics and highlights the highly sectoral and country-focused approaches taken with regard to the EGD. In our paper, we highlight the importance of the region on a geographic scale, which goes beyond the initial framework and offers a different approach to addressing the issue. The paper proves that the presence of EGD-related participation processes is significantly lacking in academic literature in the CEE region. However, the most important finding of our paper is the identification of an academic gap regarding democratic innovations and deliberation, as well as regarding active involvement and participation of people in EGD-related programs. This gives an even more important base for the assessment of the region in terms of the EGD, which faces growing populism and advancing authoritarian regimes, such that public participation and citizen control have become vitally important for the implementation of the green transition. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 2123 KiB  
Review
Integrating Paths: Enhancing Deliberative Democracy Through Collective Intelligence Insights
by Mikko Rask and Bokyong Shin
Societies 2024, 14(12), 270; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14120270 - 18 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1592
Abstract
This literature review critically examines the potential of collective intelligence (CI) to enhance theories of deliberative democracy and participatory governance through academic discourse. We employed PRISMA guidelines for systematic article selection, complemented by a narrative approach for in-depth thematic analysis and supplemented by [...] Read more.
This literature review critically examines the potential of collective intelligence (CI) to enhance theories of deliberative democracy and participatory governance through academic discourse. We employed PRISMA guidelines for systematic article selection, complemented by a narrative approach for in-depth thematic analysis and supplemented by quantitative methodologies such as Sankey diagrams and keyness analysis. Reviewing 61 scholarly articles focusing on CI within the public sector, this study identifies theoretical insights that could significantly impact the field of democratic innovations and participatory governance. Our analysis reveals that CI methodologies can make governance more inclusive and dynamic by integrating advanced digital tools that foster broader and more effective citizen participation. We conclude that integrating CI with deliberative democracy and participatory governance theories holds substantial promise for developing more responsive and adaptive governance models. Future research should focus on measuring deliberative quality in real time, deploying CI tools to empower underrepresented groups and address specific governance challenges, and examining CI’s ethical and social implications, especially concerning privacy, security, and power dynamics in technology-driven public decision-making. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop