Inside-Out: Critical Design Thinking for Transformative Social Innovation

A special issue of Societies (ISSN 2075-4698).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 September 2025) | Viewed by 4759

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Human Ecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2N1, Canada
Interests: co-creation; complicated problem solving; design anthropology; design for all; design for/with disability; design processes and methods; generative design; interdisciplinarity; material culture; multisensorial methods; radical disability studies; reflexivity; systems and ecological thinking; visual ethnography
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Information Design, Mount Royal University, Calgary, AB T3E 6K6, Canada
Interests: design-based/led participatory research; design education; design(erly) thinking and doing; human-centered design; information design; intercultural understanding; pedagogies of co-creation; pluriversal design and social design

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Industrial and Graphic Design, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
Interests: design education; design for/with disability; design justice; design processes; design research; design thinking; empathic design research strategies; human-centered designing; industrial design; innovation; learning through doing; product design and engineering

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Design professionals and educators have been at the forefront of social innovation using design thinking and persistent and profound designing for decades, which is exemplified by the seminal works of Victor Papanek (1971), Ezio Manzini (2007), and Constanza-Chock (2020). Designing for social innovation responds to important issues such as human equity, access, and inclusion; the complexities of healthcare; environmental crises; and social justice. Furthermore, design thinking methods have been adopted by policy writers, business professionals, and others as means to support the complex world we currently inhabit and to engage in more human-centred practises. This Special Issue, ‘Inside-Out: Critical Design Thinking for Transformative Social Innovation’, is a forum to explore and highlight critical design thinking from within the rich fields of design. We begin with the words ‘Inside-Out’ to represent our positions within design where thinking processes such as complex problem-identification and problem-solving, reflexivity, and systems thinking are employed to focus and centre on non-human things such as words, images, materials, objects, products, homes, public buildings, and built environments. ‘Inside-Out’ also refers to the human-centred practises of designing where social innovation is most often community-driven; this results in designs that provoke social consciousness and move towards creating tangible shifts where designed things support living beings in profound and meaningful ways. As such, ‘Inside-Outness’ is about co-creation processes, experiences, communities, society, culture, and designed things.

The practises of profound and persistent designing are a kind of 'Critical Design Thinking' that cannot be characterized as one type of designing. ‘Critical Design Thinking’ uses methods and processes where goals are established that aid in better human–thing interfaces. These methods and processes are as diverse as the products created, and often involve considering multiple living beings (humans, animals, and plants), technologies (pluralistic systems and unlikeness that co-exist), physical things, and more. ‘Critical Design Thinking’ pushes designers and the communities they engage with in ways that result in layered meanings, knowledge, and unexpected outcomes beyond the object world. Although objects are often the tangible (and fundable) outcomes, there are also more intangible social and cultural outcomes such as experiences or services.

For this Special Issue of Societies, the editors are seeking articles that highlight the various ways critical design thinking can respond to social issues and/or has resulted in tangible and intangible social innovation. Articles can report on speculative or completed projects but must place emphasis on design methodologies or processes rather than simply reporting on finished products.

  • Individual, complementary, or contrasting case studies are welcome, but these must offer up social dilemmas solved through any form of design (e.g., information design, graphic design, product design, private or public spaces, urban or rural landscapes, etc.).
  • Contributions may explore participatory design research and collaborative creativity as essential components in addressing complex social issues.
  • Additionally, we emphasize the importance of learning and unlearning when reflecting on critical design thinking for social innovation work, as these processes are crucial for fostering genuine and sustainable change.

In this way, our Special Issue, ‘Inside-Out: Critical Design Thinking for Transformative Social Innovation’, aims to bring together and celebrate persistent and profound designing as a focused area within the fields of design.

Contributions must follow one of the three categories of papers (article, conceptual paper, or review) of the journal and address the topic of the Special Issue.

Dr. Megan Strickfaden
Dr. Naureen Mumtaz
Prof. Joyce Thomas
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as conceptual papers are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Societies is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • equity-centred design
  • design for disability
  • design for health
  • design futures and foresights
  • design justice
  • design methodologies and processes
  • design pedagogy
  • generative design
  • inclusive futures
  • inter-, multi-, and transdisciplinary collaborations
  • learning and unlearning
  • participatory and co-created design research
  • systems design thinking
  • sustainable futures

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

25 pages, 3797 KB  
Article
Critical Interventions, Real Conversations: Discursive Design for Culturally Tailored Smoking Cessation
by Nina Wolf, Sébastien Proulx and Joanne G. Patterson
Societies 2025, 15(12), 348; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15120348 - 12 Dec 2025
Abstract
This exploratory study examines how discursive design—using provocative, speculative artifacts to spark reflection and discussion—might expand public health experts’ problematization of approaches to tailoring and targeting interventions. Cultural tailoring and targeting (CTT) refers to adapting interventions for specific sociocultural populations. Because LGBTQ+ communities [...] Read more.
This exploratory study examines how discursive design—using provocative, speculative artifacts to spark reflection and discussion—might expand public health experts’ problematization of approaches to tailoring and targeting interventions. Cultural tailoring and targeting (CTT) refers to adapting interventions for specific sociocultural populations. Because LGBTQ+ communities experience disproportionately high rates of tobacco use, this study applies discursive intervention concepts within this context to explore how they might help experts critically engage with CTT strategies for reaching LGBTQ+ populations more effectively. To investigate this, two pairs of discursive intervention concepts were designed and presented to three focus groups of public health experts. Each pair juxtaposed a conventional intervention approach with a more provocative, unfamiliar one—for example, deepfake-driven behavior disruption. The goal was to document the type of conversation discursive design could stimulate around CTT considerations and generate insights relevant to the value of design methodologies to foster new ways to problematize public health matters. Findings indicate that the concepts prompted critical conversations about CTT, although the depth and focus of engagement varied. Those with greater expertise in LGBTQ+ issues engaged more with CTT mechanisms and implications, while others focused on implementation and feasibility concerns—essential to intervention development but outside the study’s focus. These patterns highlight who should be included in such efforts and how they should be engaged from a facilitation perspective, raising important considerations for methodological refinements and future research. Overall, this initial exploration aims to uncover the potential of discursive design to deepen understanding of CTT interventions and inform more responsive, innovative approaches to addressing tobacco use among priority populations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 5048 KB  
Article
Living Counter-Maps: A Board Game as Critical Design for Relational Communication in Dementia Care
by Shital Desai, Sheryl Peris, Ria Saraiya and Rachel Remesat
Societies 2025, 15(12), 347; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15120347 - 11 Dec 2025
Abstract
Dementia disrupts communication not only as a cognitive process but as a relational practice, leaving people living with dementia (PLwD) at risk of exclusion when language fragments. This study examines how communication closeness, the felt sense of being understood, emotionally attuned, and socially [...] Read more.
Dementia disrupts communication not only as a cognitive process but as a relational practice, leaving people living with dementia (PLwD) at risk of exclusion when language fragments. This study examines how communication closeness, the felt sense of being understood, emotionally attuned, and socially connected, might be supported through Research in and through Design (Ri&tD). Drawing on formative mixed-reality studies and a participatory co-design workshop with PLwD, caregivers, and stakeholders, we iteratively developed a series of playful artifacts culminating in Neighbourly, a tactile board game designed to support relational interaction through rule-based, multimodal play. Across this design genealogy, prototypes were treated as Living Counter-Maps: participatory mappings that made patterns of gesture, rhythm, shared attention, and material engagement visible and discussable. Through iterative interpretation and synthesis, the study identifies three guiding principles for designing for communication closeness: supporting co-regulation rather than correction, enabling multimodal reciprocity, and providing a shared material focus for joint agency. The paper consolidates these insights in the Living Counter-Maps Framework, which integrates counter-mapping and Ri&tD as a methodological approach for studying and designing relational communication in dementia care. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 12655 KB  
Article
Building a New World in the Shell of the Old: Co-Designing Post-Capitalist Visions
by Alix Gerber
Societies 2025, 15(10), 283; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15100283 - 9 Oct 2025
Viewed by 764
Abstract
Designers working towards social change have often focused on designing discrete solutions to social problems, rather than working within the long-term world-making practices of movements. This paper examines the potential of a more embedded design practice within prefigurative movements, where mutual aid networks, [...] Read more.
Designers working towards social change have often focused on designing discrete solutions to social problems, rather than working within the long-term world-making practices of movements. This paper examines the potential of a more embedded design practice within prefigurative movements, where mutual aid networks, worker cooperatives, and other solidarity economy initiatives are already developing alternative systems in the present. What if we could design everyday tools with these collectives to embody their transformative visions? Yet it can be difficult to design for transformation collaboratively. Collectives include members with diverse visions that can conflict, as well as different ideas about how to create change. To explore these challenges, I discuss a project that guided local prefigurative collectives in articulating and sharing their visions of a future 100 years beyond the fall of capitalism by co-creating an illustrated map. The project achieved the collaborative articulation of transformed futures, and it also initiated a dialogue on how to design for these transformative visions today. Moving forward, the project raises questions about the risks of sharing diverging visions while attempting to build coalitions, as well as the opportunity to clarify where our dreams overlap and diverge, empowering collective members to take non-normative steps with confidence. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 4348 KB  
Article
Design Thinking, Acting, and Making Net Zero Transformational Change Across NHS Scotland
by Paul A. Rodgers, Mel Woods, Sonja Oliveira, Efstathios Tapinos, David Bucknall, Fraser Bruce, Andrew Wodehouse, Gregor White and Marc P. Y. Desmulliez
Societies 2025, 15(8), 222; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15080222 - 13 Aug 2025
Viewed by 903
Abstract
Climate change is the biggest global health threat of the 21st century. However, this challenge presents an opportunity to do things differently. This paper sets out how, using a design-led and collaborative approach, one can re-imagine the delivery of healthcare itself in a [...] Read more.
Climate change is the biggest global health threat of the 21st century. However, this challenge presents an opportunity to do things differently. This paper sets out how, using a design-led and collaborative approach, one can re-imagine the delivery of healthcare itself in a way that will deliver environmental sustainability. The paper presents a series of eight projects at the intersections of design, health and wellbeing, and complex net zero challenges, with an emphasis on inclusive, equitable, and sustainable design-led interventions. This encompasses diverse interventions across and beyond conventional design boundaries such as architecture, product design, and textile design providing insights that demonstrate the impact of design thinking, making, and acting on real-world net zero issues. Addressing such a broad and complex topic requires engagement across a wide range of stakeholders. The work undertaken has been conducted as part of a UK Government-funded Green Transition Ecosystem (GTE) Hub that has allowed multiple academic disciplines, research organisations, regional and local industry, and other public sector stakeholders, to connect with policy makers. Across seven themes, the paper describes how Design HOPES (Healthy Organisations in a Place-based Ecosystem, Scotland), as a design-led GTE Hub, brings in multiple and marginalised perspectives and how its design-led projects as one part of a wider movement for transformational change can re-use, nurture and develop these interventions sustainably. The overarching ambition being, through our collaborative design-led thinking, making, and acting, to build a more equitable and sustainable health and social care system across Scotland. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

38 pages, 19101 KB  
Article
Co-Designing School Routes with Children: What Matters in Sensory Design for Wellbeing?
by Jessica Rohdin, Åsa Wikberg-Nilsson, Kajsa Lindström and Frida Thuresson
Societies 2025, 15(8), 219; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15080219 - 11 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1191
Abstract
Children’s physical and mental wellbeing is declining, partly due to reduced independent mobility and lack of engaging public environments. This study explores a co-design approach in which children actively participated in a series of design workshops focused on improving school routes through sensory [...] Read more.
Children’s physical and mental wellbeing is declining, partly due to reduced independent mobility and lack of engaging public environments. This study explores a co-design approach in which children actively participated in a series of design workshops focused on improving school routes through sensory engagement and imagination. Using sensory walks, students mapped positive and negative experiences in their everyday surroundings. Through hands-on creative exercises and the integration of AI and VR tools, they developed design proposals envisioning safer, more enjoyable, and inclusive mobility environments. The findings reveal that while children are highly capable of generating creative and context-sensitive ideas, they are less accustomed to reflecting on sensory input beyond vision. The results underscore the importance of designing urban spaces that prioritize safety, playfulness, and multisensory richness, with particular emphasis on nature and emotional connection. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop