Inside-Out: Critical Design Thinking for Transformative Social Innovation

A special issue of Societies (ISSN 2075-4698).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 September 2025 | Viewed by 1891

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Human Ecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2N1, Canada
Interests: co-creation; complicated problem solving; design anthropology; design for all; design for/with disability; design processes and methods; generative design; interdisciplinarity; material culture; multisensorial methods; radical disability studies; reflexivity; systems and ecological thinking; visual ethnography
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Information Design, Mount Royal University, Calgary, AB T3E 6K6, Canada
Interests: design-based/led participatory research; design education; design(erly) thinking and doing; human-centered design; information design; intercultural understanding; pedagogies of co-creation; pluriversal design and social design

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Industrial and Graphic Design, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
Interests: design education; design for/with disability; design justice; design processes; design research; design thinking; empathic design research strategies; human-centered designing; industrial design; innovation; learning through doing; product design and engineering

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Design professionals and educators have been at the forefront of social innovation using design thinking and persistent and profound designing for decades, which is exemplified by the seminal works of Victor Papanek (1971), Ezio Manzini (2007), and Constanza-Chock (2020). Designing for social innovation responds to important issues such as human equity, access, and inclusion; the complexities of healthcare; environmental crises; and social justice. Furthermore, design thinking methods have been adopted by policy writers, business professionals, and others as means to support the complex world we currently inhabit and to engage in more human-centred practises. This Special Issue, ‘Inside-Out: Critical Design Thinking for Transformative Social Innovation’, is a forum to explore and highlight critical design thinking from within the rich fields of design. We begin with the words ‘Inside-Out’ to represent our positions within design where thinking processes such as complex problem-identification and problem-solving, reflexivity, and systems thinking are employed to focus and centre on non-human things such as words, images, materials, objects, products, homes, public buildings, and built environments. ‘Inside-Out’ also refers to the human-centred practises of designing where social innovation is most often community-driven; this results in designs that provoke social consciousness and move towards creating tangible shifts where designed things support living beings in profound and meaningful ways. As such, ‘Inside-Outness’ is about co-creation processes, experiences, communities, society, culture, and designed things.

The practises of profound and persistent designing are a kind of 'Critical Design Thinking' that cannot be characterized as one type of designing. ‘Critical Design Thinking’ uses methods and processes where goals are established that aid in better human–thing interfaces. These methods and processes are as diverse as the products created, and often involve considering multiple living beings (humans, animals, and plants), technologies (pluralistic systems and unlikeness that co-exist), physical things, and more. ‘Critical Design Thinking’ pushes designers and the communities they engage with in ways that result in layered meanings, knowledge, and unexpected outcomes beyond the object world. Although objects are often the tangible (and fundable) outcomes, there are also more intangible social and cultural outcomes such as experiences or services.

For this Special Issue of Societies, the editors are seeking articles that highlight the various ways critical design thinking can respond to social issues and/or has resulted in tangible and intangible social innovation. Articles can report on speculative or completed projects but must place emphasis on design methodologies or processes rather than simply reporting on finished products.

  • Individual, complementary, or contrasting case studies are welcome, but these must offer up social dilemmas solved through any form of design (e.g., information design, graphic design, product design, private or public spaces, urban or rural landscapes, etc.).
  • Contributions may explore participatory design research and collaborative creativity as essential components in addressing complex social issues.
  • Additionally, we emphasize the importance of learning and unlearning when reflecting on critical design thinking for social innovation work, as these processes are crucial for fostering genuine and sustainable change.

In this way, our Special Issue, ‘Inside-Out: Critical Design Thinking for Transformative Social Innovation’, aims to bring together and celebrate persistent and profound designing as a focused area within the fields of design.

Contributions must follow one of the three categories of papers (article, conceptual paper, or review) of the journal and address the topic of the Special Issue.

Dr. Megan Strickfaden
Dr. Naureen Mumtaz
Prof. Joyce Thomas
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as conceptual papers are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Societies is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • equity-centred design
  • design for disability
  • design for health
  • design futures and foresights
  • design justice
  • design methodologies and processes
  • design pedagogy
  • generative design
  • inclusive futures
  • inter-, multi-, and transdisciplinary collaborations
  • learning and unlearning
  • participatory and co-created design research
  • systems design thinking
  • sustainable futures

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 4348 KB  
Article
Design Thinking, Acting, and Making Net Zero Transformational Change Across NHS Scotland
by Paul A. Rodgers, Mel Woods, Sonja Oliveira, Efstathios Tapinos, David Bucknall, Fraser Bruce, Andrew Wodehouse, Gregor White and Marc P. Y. Desmulliez
Societies 2025, 15(8), 222; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15080222 - 13 Aug 2025
Viewed by 235
Abstract
Climate change is the biggest global health threat of the 21st century. However, this challenge presents an opportunity to do things differently. This paper sets out how, using a design-led and collaborative approach, one can re-imagine the delivery of healthcare itself in a [...] Read more.
Climate change is the biggest global health threat of the 21st century. However, this challenge presents an opportunity to do things differently. This paper sets out how, using a design-led and collaborative approach, one can re-imagine the delivery of healthcare itself in a way that will deliver environmental sustainability. The paper presents a series of eight projects at the intersections of design, health and wellbeing, and complex net zero challenges, with an emphasis on inclusive, equitable, and sustainable design-led interventions. This encompasses diverse interventions across and beyond conventional design boundaries such as architecture, product design, and textile design providing insights that demonstrate the impact of design thinking, making, and acting on real-world net zero issues. Addressing such a broad and complex topic requires engagement across a wide range of stakeholders. The work undertaken has been conducted as part of a UK Government-funded Green Transition Ecosystem (GTE) Hub that has allowed multiple academic disciplines, research organisations, regional and local industry, and other public sector stakeholders, to connect with policy makers. Across seven themes, the paper describes how Design HOPES (Healthy Organisations in a Place-based Ecosystem, Scotland), as a design-led GTE Hub, brings in multiple and marginalised perspectives and how its design-led projects as one part of a wider movement for transformational change can re-use, nurture and develop these interventions sustainably. The overarching ambition being, through our collaborative design-led thinking, making, and acting, to build a more equitable and sustainable health and social care system across Scotland. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

38 pages, 19101 KB  
Article
Co-Designing School Routes with Children: What Matters in Sensory Design for Wellbeing?
by Jessica Rohdin, Åsa Wikberg-Nilsson, Kajsa Lindström and Frida Thuresson
Societies 2025, 15(8), 219; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15080219 - 11 Aug 2025
Viewed by 315
Abstract
Children’s physical and mental wellbeing is declining, partly due to reduced independent mobility and lack of engaging public environments. This study explores a co-design approach in which children actively participated in a series of design workshops focused on improving school routes through sensory [...] Read more.
Children’s physical and mental wellbeing is declining, partly due to reduced independent mobility and lack of engaging public environments. This study explores a co-design approach in which children actively participated in a series of design workshops focused on improving school routes through sensory engagement and imagination. Using sensory walks, students mapped positive and negative experiences in their everyday surroundings. Through hands-on creative exercises and the integration of AI and VR tools, they developed design proposals envisioning safer, more enjoyable, and inclusive mobility environments. The findings reveal that while children are highly capable of generating creative and context-sensitive ideas, they are less accustomed to reflecting on sensory input beyond vision. The results underscore the importance of designing urban spaces that prioritize safety, playfulness, and multisensory richness, with particular emphasis on nature and emotional connection. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop