Participatory Arts-Based Research Approaches with People with Disabilities: Cultural Contexts and Intersectional Perspectives

A special issue of Societies (ISSN 2075-4698). This special issue belongs to the section "Disabled People/People with Disabilities (Non-Medical Coverage)".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 September 2026 | Viewed by 1769

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Education, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Interests: arts-based research methods; well-being of individuals with disability; inclusive research; special and inclusive education

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Education, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Interests: research methodologies; education policy; gifted education

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Participatory approaches and arts-based research methods have been increasingly used in research with individiuals with disabilities (Liddiard et al., 2019). However, a critical gap remains at their intersection, especially when considering diverse cultural contexts and intersectional identities (Coemans & Hannes, 2017; Rice et al., 2019). Currently, reseachers often silo these approaches, treating participatory frameworks, artistic inquiry, cultural responsiveness, and intersectionality as separate methodological considerations rather than integrated aspects of research design (Leavy, 2017; Nguyen, 2019). This separation has inadvertently prevented the understanding of how the combinations of these approaches could improve research with individuals with disabilities (Liddiard et al., 2019). Additionally, existing methodological frameworks largely reflect Western epistemologies and contexts, with limited guidance on how these approaches can be meaningfully adapted across diverse cultural settings.

This Special Issue aims to address these gaps by bringing together research that explicitly integrates participatory principles with arts-based research methods while considering cultural differences and intersenting identities. This Issue’s significance lies in its potential to advance research methods that respect different ways of knowing (Denzin & Lincoln, 2018), creates accessible pathways for expression beyond verbal and written communication (Danker et al., 2017), addresses power imbalances across cultural contexts (Hossain et al., 2023), and captures the complex experiences at the intersection of disability, culture, and other aspects of identity (Artiles, 2013; Erevelles & Minear, 2010). By fostering this methodological integration, this Special Issue will contribute to more equitable, creative, and culturally responsive research that can meaningfully engage people with disabilities as knowledge creators rather than research subjects (Nind, 2014).

As such, this Special Issue will explore participatory arts-based research approaches that engage individuals with disabilities as active research collaborators across diverse cultural contexts and intersectional identities. Specifically, this Issue will focus on:

  1. Participatory arts-based approaches where individuals with disabilities are co-researchers and co-creators throughout the research process.
  2. Cultural adaptations and contextual sensitivity in designing and implementing participatory arts-based approaches across diverse communities.
  3. Intersectional applications examining how participatory arts-based approaches can reveal and address the complex interplay between disability and other aspects of identity (e.g., gender, ethnicity, and sexuality).
  4. Participatory arts-based approaches such as photovoice and bodymapping that enable the voices of cultutrally diverse individuals with disabilities.
  5. Methodological adaptations, ethical considerations, and power dynamics when conducting cross-cultural participatory arts-based research with individuals with disabilities.

Contributions must be either articles, conceptual papers, or reviews and must address the topic of the Special Issue.

References

  1. Artiles, A. J. (2013). Untangling the racialization of disabilities: An intersectionality critique across disability models. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10, 329-347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000271.
  2. Coemans, S., & Hannes, K. (2017). Researchers under the spell of the arts: Two decades of using arts-based methods in community-based inquiry with vulnerable populations. Educational Research Review, 22, 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.003.
  3. Danker, J., Strnadová, I., & Cumming, T. M. (2017). Engaging students with autism spectrum disorders in research through participant-driven photo-elicitation research technique. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 41, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1017/jse.2016.7.
  4. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.
  5. Erevelles, N., & Minear, A. (2010). Unspeakable offenses: Untangling race and disability in discourses of intersectionality. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 4, 127-145. https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2010.11.
  6. Hossain, S., Strnadová, I., Danker, J., Noor Ahsan, N., & Rahman Nebir, R. (2023). Taking part while being apart: Conducting participatory research with children during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 46, 374-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2023.2208052.
  7. Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Press.
  8. Liddiard, K., Runswick-Cole, K., Goodley, D., Whitney, S., Vogelmann, E., & Watts, L. (2019). "I was excited by the idea of a project that focuses on those unasked questions": Co-producing disability research with disabled young people. Children & Society, 33, 154-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12308.
  9. Nind, M. (2020). Inclusive research: Research methods.  Bloomsbury Publishing
  10. Rice, C., Harrison, E., & Friedman, M. (2019). Doing justice to intersectionality in research. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 19, 409-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708619829779.

Dr. Joanne Danker
Dr. Adrian W. Chew
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as conceptual papers are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Societies is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • participatory research
  • arts-based research methods
  • inclusive research
  • cultural responsiveness
  • intersectionality
  • Photovoice
  • bodymapping
  • knowledge co-production
  • disability

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 12680 KB  
Article
‘Let Us Be the Art, Not Just the Entertainment’: A Participatory Zine-Making Study Engaging Autistic Women and Non-Binary People in Discussing Media Representations of Autism
by Sarah Dantas, Monique Botha, Catherine Grainger, Eva Rafetseder and Carol Jasper
Societies 2026, 16(5), 145; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16050145 - 29 Apr 2026
Abstract
Autistic people experience social stigma, which involves facing negative or false social stereotypes. A prevalent stereotype of autism in society is that it is a male condition, which has led to most traditional representations of autism across different types of media (e.g., characters [...] Read more.
Autistic people experience social stigma, which involves facing negative or false social stereotypes. A prevalent stereotype of autism in society is that it is a male condition, which has led to most traditional representations of autism across different types of media (e.g., characters in films and TV) being predominantly male-focused. In this study, a group of autistic women and/or non-binary people were recruited to speak about how they perceived media representations of autism, as their gender identities did not fit this traditional gendered stereotype. Participants shared their experiences through group discussions and a zine-making activity, where they created different forms of artwork that were then compiled into an independent community booklet and displayed in an exhibition in Central Scotland. Participants’ group discussions and descriptions of their artwork were analysed using IPA techniques, yielding two experiential themes. Participants discussed negative experiences with dehumanising media accounts of autism, which displayed autistic people as a stereotypical ‘other’, as well as positive experiences with humanised media accounts, which prioritised autistic lived experience in a more authentic and relatable way. Our findings highlight that the media can positively impact autistic people’s lives when representations centre on autistic lived experience, which fosters connectedness, autonomy, and self-understanding. Alternatively, this impact can be harmful when media accounts are stigmatising and dehumanising, which generates significant material and subjective challenges. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 3089 KB  
Article
Museums as Safe Spaces: An Ethnography of Inclusion and Exclusion with Visitors with Down Syndrome
by Elena Tesser and Gabriele Carmelo Rosato
Societies 2026, 16(2), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16020049 - 5 Feb 2026
Viewed by 1000
Abstract
Museums are cultural spaces that should promote accessibility and inclusion for all. However, accessibility is often interpreted as removing physical barriers, overlooking less visible obstacles—such as cognitive, sensory, and communicative challenges—that can profoundly shape the museum experience for people with intellectual disabilities. This [...] Read more.
Museums are cultural spaces that should promote accessibility and inclusion for all. However, accessibility is often interpreted as removing physical barriers, overlooking less visible obstacles—such as cognitive, sensory, and communicative challenges—that can profoundly shape the museum experience for people with intellectual disabilities. This paper presents an ethnographic case study conducted in the Veneto region of Italy, in collaboration with a group of individuals with Down Syndrome (DS), aiming to explore their lived experiences of a museum visit. Drawing on participant observation and in-depth interviews, the study examines how visitors with DS engage with the museum environment on behavioural and sensory levels. Findings reveal the impact of environmental stimuli, difficulties in navigating abstract or densely layered visual content, and the importance of embodied interaction with objects and spatial cues. Positive experiences emerged from relational engagement, guided facilitation, and the use of multi-sensory supports. The study underscores the need for museums to move beyond compensatory or charity-based models of accessibility, and instead adopt inclusive design principles that value neurodiversity and participatory co-creation. In doing so, this research contributes to the emerging discourse on how museums can become safe spaces for learning, dialogue, and self-expression for people with intellectual disabilities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop