Seeking Truth and Meaning: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Religion and Philosophy

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 January 2026 | Viewed by 681

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Howard College of Arts and Sciences, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229, USA
Interests: John D. Caputo; literary and cultural theory; narrative and interpretation; hermeneutic phenomenology; continental philosophy

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In his small but substantial text, Philosophy and Theology, John D. Caputo offers a concise but clever commentary on the conjunction “and” by specifically addressing what he considers to be the tensive polysemy inherent in that integrating word. For him, that polysemy proscribes simply translating the conjunction homogeneously as a facile semantic adhesive joining two similar or related concepts. In other words, his injunction against that reductionistic interpretation arises from a belief that the conjunction “and” may always disguise a disjunctive potential intimating that the concepts conjoined by the copulative may not only be allies but adversaries as well. This semantic coefficient of uncertainty demands what Jacques Derrida would term a “negotiation” between the plausibly divergent readings of the word—a “shuttling” to and fro between undecidable meanings that may never be absolutely defined. As a result, “and” may communicate conceptual collegiality between correlative ideas (e.g., faith and reason), and/or it may signal conflictual competition between antagonistic terms (e.g., Pro-Choice and Pro-Life).

I note Caputo’s radical hermeneutics of “and” because it directly pertains to the proposed title of this Special Issue of Religions. If one examines that title, one will quickly recognize the repetition of only one word—the conjunction “and,” “Seeking Truth and Meaning: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Religion and Philosophy.” “Truth,” “meaning,” “religion,” and “philosophy”—significant ideas all paired through the power of the conjunction. Does one coordinate truth and meaning as relatable ideas, or does one isolate them as incompatible notions? For example, may one define truth in a broader manner that allows for a transcendence of a narrow correspondence or consistency, thereby allowing for a filiation between truth and meaning in an existential sense? Or must one choose between truth as adequation and meaning as emotive, that is, as hostiles within a battle for the empirical? Likewise, does one assume a comparability between philosophy and religion (since both disciplines commit to a desire for truth and meaning), something akin to a Socratic aspiration for wisdom? Or does one disassociate philosophy and religion as incommensurable language games connected only by category mistakes in that the former maintains a critical perspective while the latter constantly struggles to elude perfunctory superstition?

The above questions actually identify the desired content sought for this Special Issue of Religions. Contributions are coveted that specifically engage in various interpretations of what “truth” and “meaning” may mean, as well as how one may reconcile or rupture the consistencies and inconsistencies between philosophy and religion. The scope of such investigative essays broadens across disciplinary lines, not only with reference to “formal” disciplines in university—science, history, anthropology, or sociology, to name a few—but also moves across genres and activities—art, poetry, or morality, to name a few others. Essays may seek to synthesize the various pairs of concepts or to acknowledge Caputo’s inchoate disjunction within the conjunction and critically differentiate them. Essays might focus on hermeneutical issues relevant to truth as manifestation or to sense as existential significance or to fiction and narrative as profoundly suggestive of the differentiation and integration of philosophy and religion. Importantly, of course, as stated quite explicitly in the title and reiterated above, essays may generate from any discipline or from any cultural manifestation of the human desire for purpose, thereby providing the “interdisciplinary perspectives” preferred for this Special Issue.

Prof. Dr. B. Keith Putt
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • truth
  • meaning
  • philosophy
  • religion
  • interdisciplinary perspectives

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 309 KB  
Article
From Religious Representation to Conceptual Truth: The Role of Religion in Hegel’s Philosophical System
by Guanyu Guo
Religions 2025, 16(9), 1187; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16091187 - 15 Sep 2025
Viewed by 68
Abstract
The present study interprets the indispensable mediating role of religion within Hegel’s monistic system. This study undertakes a systematic investigation of the development of Hegel’s religious thought in different periods, his logical reconstruction of multiple religions, and the positioning of religion within his [...] Read more.
The present study interprets the indispensable mediating role of religion within Hegel’s monistic system. This study undertakes a systematic investigation of the development of Hegel’s religious thought in different periods, his logical reconstruction of multiple religions, and the positioning of religion within his system. The central argument posits that religions, particularly Christianity, serve as a pivotal experiential and representational conduit that facilitates Spirit’s ascent from the inherent dualism of consciousness, as inherited from Descartes and solidified by Kant, to the monistic paradigm of the speculative concept (Begriff) or absolute Knowing (absolutes Wissen). Whilst art offers immediate sensuous intuition (Anschauung) of the Absolute, philosophy achieves pure conceptual comprehension (begreifendes Denken). The function of religion can be considered to be twofold. Firstly, it is important to note that religion provides the essential communal form for grasping substantial content. Secondly, the representational form demands inherent necessity, its own sublation (Aufhebung), and elevation to conceptual truth. The rational content of Christianity, found in the Trinity’s logical structure and the Incarnation (Menschwerdung Gottes), demands translation into the self-determining concept (Begriff). “The death of God” is posited by representation as a means to facilitate the subsequent reconstruction of the Concept. Philosophy serves to sublimate religion by preserving its truth-content, negating its inadequate form, and elevating it into pure conceptual truth. Consequently, religion functions as the indispensable “prelude to scientific truth”, and the necessary pathway to absolute knowing, where absolute Spirit achieves complete self-transparency in the speculative Concept. Hegel affirms religion’s vital mediating role not as the endpoint, but as the essential bridge enabling Spirit’s ascent from religious representation (Vorstellung) to conceptual absolute knowing. Finally, in exploring the interplay of truth and meaning, Hegel’s notions of Vorstellung and Begriff offer a speculative framework where religious meaning is embodied in logical and historical contexts, while philosophical truth transforms it into conceptual form, thus enriching both hermeneutics and dialectical understanding. Full article
Back to TopTop