Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
1.3
0.7
Journals
Religions
Special Issues
Classical Theism, Evil and Its Varieties: Abrahamic Science-Engaged Theology
share announcement

Classical Theism, Evil and Its Varieties: Abrahamic Science-Engaged Theology

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2024) | Viewed by 14928

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Sasa Horvat

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Social Sciences and Medical Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
Interests: philosophy of science; philosophy of religion; neurophilosophy; philosophical anthropology; cognitive science of religion; ontology; theodicy
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Dr. Piotr Roszak

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Theology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
Interests: theology of science; theodicy; science–religion debate; Thomism; pilgrimage; medieval liturgy; philosophy of religion; religious freedom
Dr. Shoaib Ahmed Malik

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Natural and Health Sciences, Zayed University, Dubai 19282, United Arab Emirates
Interests: Islamic theology; Islam and atheism; Islam and science

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The problem of evil and its varieties are one of the most significant issues that affect all theistic traditions. On the one hand, several theists believe that God is omnibenevolent, alongside being omniscient and omnipotent. On the other hand, suffering and evil exist in the universe. How can we reconcile these two apparent contradicting positions? Several theological and philosophical developments in classical theism (in Islam, Christianity, and Judaism) tried to square this issue in various ways.

However, the contemporary period raises many new issues that demand renewed attention to an age-old question. New problems have arisen in biology, medicine, genetics, cognitive science, anthropological findings, social and cultural complexities, and environmental issues, to name a few, which provide new and exciting avenues for the problem of evil.

For instance, Yujun Nagasawa (2018) suggests that evolutionary biology requires a new moral category of evil that he calls the 'systemic problem of evil,' as it is a long-term process that governs the development of life, which has resulted in extensive death and suffering of several lifeforms in the process. Accordingly, it does not neatly fit into the categories of moral or natural evil. Another example is the discussion of biological determinism, which is the position that our genes influence us towards certain behaviours because of our genetic predispositions. How strongly should we let such insights affect our understanding of moral agency, which affects our understanding of moral evil? Such questions and inquiries are of interest to this Special Issue.

In the spirit of science-engaged theology (Perry and Leidenhag, 2021), we believe that new and rich theological developments can be made in light of these new developments. We invite you to join our adventure of understanding all these new forms of evil that continue to challenge theistic traditions. In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome, particularly interdisciplinary approaches to the topic.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

References

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2018. “The Problem of Evil for Atheists.” In Nick N Trakakis, ed. The Problem of Evil: Eight Views in Dialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 151–175.

John Perry and Joanna Leidenhag. 2021. “What is Science-Engaged Theology?” Modern Theology, 37(2), 245-253.

Dr. Sasa Horvat
Dr. Piotr Roszak
Dr. Shoaib Ahmed Malik
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • evil
  • theism
  • biology
  • theodicy
  • indeterminancy
  • values
  • moral

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 306 KiB  
Article
Akkirmânî’s Occasionalist Approach to the Neuroscientific Research on the Human Will
by Nazif Muhtaroglu
Religions 2024, 15(9), 1134; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091134 - 20 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1228
Abstract
In this paper, I explore the problem of human freedom and responsibility in light of current neuroscientific research, particularly focusing on Libet-style experiments. Beginning with a review of significant experiments on the nature of human will, starting with Libet’s influential series from the [...] Read more.
In this paper, I explore the problem of human freedom and responsibility in light of current neuroscientific research, particularly focusing on Libet-style experiments. Beginning with a review of significant experiments on the nature of human will, starting with Libet’s influential series from the 1980s, I survey various interpretations of these experiments including those that pose challenges to concepts of human freedom and responsibility. Subsequently, I introduce the perspective of Mehmed Akkirmânî (d. 1760), an Ottoman scholar who advocates for a libertarian view of human freedom within an occasionalist framework and constructs sophisticated arguments against theological determinism. Akkirmânî’s analysis of human will delineates different aspects such as inclinations, intentions, and decisions, positing that humans possess freedom solely in their conscious decisions, thereby suggesting a limited scope of free will. I argue that Akkirmânî’s views are remarkably consonant with contemporary scientific findings and align with some libertarian positions. His occasionalist perspective offers an alternative model to contemporary naturalist physicalism in elucidating the connection between mental and neurophysical states. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Classical Theism, Evil and Its Varieties: Abrahamic Science-Engaged Theology)
12 pages, 282 KiB  
Article
NIODA and the Problem of Evil: God as Ultimate Determiner
by Javier Sánchez-Cañizares
Religions 2023, 14(8), 1037; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14081037 - 14 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1959
Abstract
The problem of evil permeates contemporary theodicy, raising the question of how an omnipotent and benevolent God can allow its existence. Exploring this inquiry is inherently tied to investigating divine action, specifically the interplay between time and eternity within a temporary creation. In [...] Read more.
The problem of evil permeates contemporary theodicy, raising the question of how an omnipotent and benevolent God can allow its existence. Exploring this inquiry is inherently tied to investigating divine action, specifically the interplay between time and eternity within a temporary creation. In recent decades, the Non-Interventionist Objective Divine Action (NIODA) project has endeavored to present a science-backed perspective that acknowledges a respectful divine action harmonizing with the workings of nature. However, this viewpoint has faced criticism from various angles, particularly for its perceived inability to provide a definitive response to the problem of evil. This contribution aims to overcome these criticisms. While not necessarily endorsing the NIODA proposal, it seeks to present a fresh outlook on the question of evil that aligns with NIODA, addressing the dichotomy between the unity and plurality of divine action in the world and offering novel insights for the Christian doctrine of creation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Classical Theism, Evil and Its Varieties: Abrahamic Science-Engaged Theology)
13 pages, 2221 KiB  
Article
Anatomical Analysis of Holbein’s Dead Christ in the Tomb and Corresponding Theological Commentary
by Daniel Miščin and Lovorka Grgurević
Religions 2023, 14(7), 951; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14070951 - 24 Jul 2023
Viewed by 1833
Abstract
Approaching Hans Holbein’s painting The Body of the Dead Christ in the Tomb (1521/22) this paper combines the expertise of anatomical analysis and the perspective of theology and philosophy in order to address some of the well-rooted assumptions about Holbein in the historical [...] Read more.
Approaching Hans Holbein’s painting The Body of the Dead Christ in the Tomb (1521/22) this paper combines the expertise of anatomical analysis and the perspective of theology and philosophy in order to address some of the well-rooted assumptions about Holbein in the historical reception of his Dead Christ. The authors propose a balanced conclusion about the hypothesis of a drowned man from the Rhine being a model for the painting, pointing out that the body of the man from Holbein’s painting, according to anatomical details, could not have previously been in water. Furthermore, the absence of an Adam’s apple on Christ’s body is interpreted in the light of New Testament texts, rather than as a result of Holbein’s lack of anatomical precision. Similarly, the fact that Holbein painted a corpse deprived of all signs of divinity is seen in connection with the theological notion of kenosis. Ultimately, the authors conclude that the results of the anatomical analysis reflect the key elements of the hermeneutics of Gospel reports of Christ’s passion and death. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Classical Theism, Evil and Its Varieties: Abrahamic Science-Engaged Theology)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 403 KiB  
Article
God in the Face of Natural and Moral Evils: A Thomistic Approach
by Juan José Sanguineti
Religions 2023, 14(7), 816; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14070816 - 21 Jun 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2066
Abstract
The existence of evil in a world created by God raises very difficult questions to answer. Under the inspiration of Thomistic philosophy, in this article we face this problem first of all “from below”, trying to understand the meaning of physical evils in [...] Read more.
The existence of evil in a world created by God raises very difficult questions to answer. Under the inspiration of Thomistic philosophy, in this article we face this problem first of all “from below”, trying to understand the meaning of physical evils in living nature, especially in animals (pain, aggressive interactions). Secondly, in thinking of the enormous amount of moral evil in the human world, we consider the biblical faith in original sin as illuminating. We examine some points of Thomas Aquinas in this regard, especially his thesis that the physical cosmos is not affected by original sin and that the loss of man’s primitive happy situation involves a contradiction between his spiritual aspirations and his mortal nature subject to limits and suffering. This situation is remedied by the help God gives man through his ordinary Providence, which includes a personal struggle against evil, and above all through his salvific plan which we know thanks to the biblical faith. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Classical Theism, Evil and Its Varieties: Abrahamic Science-Engaged Theology)
17 pages, 270 KiB  
Article
Rape with Murder and Suicide: The Evidential Argument from Evil against Naturalism
by Han Jen Chang
Religions 2023, 14(6), 715; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14060715 - 29 May 2023
Viewed by 5266
Abstract
The problem of evil seems to have been the patent of theism for a long time. However, some philosophers notice that this is not necessarily the case and raise arguments from evil against atheism. In this paper, I follow this insight and raise [...] Read more.
The problem of evil seems to have been the patent of theism for a long time. However, some philosophers notice that this is not necessarily the case and raise arguments from evil against atheism. In this paper, I follow this insight and raise the evidential argument from evil against naturalism. I argue that some human behaviors that cause evil and suffering contradict the principles of evolution and should not exist in a naturalistic world. Nevertheless, they do exist, and they accordingly disconfirm naturalism. To attain this conclusion, I first establish that psychological mechanisms as evolutionary causes are the ultimate causes of human behaviors if naturalism is true. Then, I argue that cases of rape with murder and suicide have contravened their relevant psychological mechanisms’ adaptive functions and should not exist. Therefore, cases of these behaviors make it reasonable to believe that naturalism is not true. Both naturalists and theists now have to raise plausible explanations for various evils in the world. It is possible for theism to outcompete naturalism with respect to evil as a result. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Classical Theism, Evil and Its Varieties: Abrahamic Science-Engaged Theology)
12 pages, 286 KiB  
Article
How to Study the Historical Imprint of Religions on Cultures According to Christopher Dawson
by Rubén Herce
Religions 2023, 14(3), 372; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14030372 - 13 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1380
Abstract
Christopher Dawson is one of the great philosophers of history. He understood the signs of the times and anticipated what was to come in Western society. He considered religion to be the soul of cultures and showed this in his writings. The aim [...] Read more.
Christopher Dawson is one of the great philosophers of history. He understood the signs of the times and anticipated what was to come in Western society. He considered religion to be the soul of cultures and showed this in his writings. The aim of this article is to articulately present Dawson’s vision of how to study religions from his discipline. To this end, it first shows the possibility of the scientific study of religion. Then it explains the method suggested by Dawson for such a study and the relevance of religious experiences and religious social types as sources for the study of religion. Finally, it analyses the constitutive elements of religion and the notions of religion that Dawson handles, always from a historical approach open to the transcendent. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Classical Theism, Evil and Its Varieties: Abrahamic Science-Engaged Theology)
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-6
Back to TopTop