Transformations in East Asia Religious Diversity: Technology, Hybridity, Equality

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2025) | Viewed by 5706

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Sociology Programme, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore
Interests: religion; tourism; development
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue invites contributions that investigate contemporary transformations in religious diversity in East Asia in rapidly evolving technological, social, and cultural environments. East Asia has long been a site of dynamic religious interactions, where indigenous traditions such as Confucianism, Daoism, and Shinto coexist and intersect with Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, and new religious movements. While there is extensive research on individual traditions, fewer studies have examined their interactions, hybridity, and contemporary transformations. Additionally, there is an urgent need for new research to address the increasingly important role of technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and digital media in shaping religious identities and interfaith relations in the region. Furthermore, while significant research has been conducted on religious institutions, state–religion relations, and economic disparities, there remain notable gaps in understanding how religion contributes to or mitigates social inequalities in East Asian societies.

This Special Issue seeks to bridge these gaps by inviting interdisciplinary, comparative, and empirically grounded contributions that shed new light on the complexities of religious diversity in contemporary East Asia.

Potential Topics and Issues

We invite scholars from diverse fields—including religious studies, sociology, anthropology, cultural studies, and political science—to submit original research articles that engage with the following themes:

  • Digital Technology and Artificial Intelligence: How are religious institutions and religious movements adapting to rapidly changing technologies? What role does digital media play in shaping religious beliefs and communities? How do the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and digital surveillance shape religious practices and governance?
  • Interfaith Relations and Hybridity: How do multiple religious traditions interact in practice in multireligious and multicultural societies in East Asia? What new forms of syncretism or hybridity have emerged? How do transnational religious movements influence religious pluralism and mobility in the region?
  • Religion and Inequalities: How do religious institutions and practices reinforce or mitigate class, gender, ethnic, or political inequalities in East Asia? For example, how do different religious traditions in East Asia engage with gender roles and LGBTQ+ identities? And in what ways do minority religious communities experience and respond to discrimination and exclusion?

Submission Guidelines

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested contributors should submit an abstract of no more than 300 words. Please send it to the Guest Editor <fkglim@ntu.edu.sg>, or to the Assistant Editor <bella.xu@mdpi.com> of Religions. Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editors for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts (7000–8000 words) will be due by 30 November 2025. All submissions will undergo a double-blind peer-review process. Please follow the journal’s formatting and citation guidelines available at the Religions website.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Francis Khek Gee Lim
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • pluralism
  • social inequalities
  • technology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 377 KB  
Article
Social Media and Hong Kong Christian Communities: Diversity and Equality
by Ann Gillian Chu and Rachel Siow Robertson
Religions 2026, 17(5), 608; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17050608 - 19 May 2026
Viewed by 98
Abstract
Social media in Hong Kong Christian communities has been viewed in terms of social equalization, allowing laity to shape theology and community practices. But how is social media an equalizer for religious communities, and along which social dimensions? Drawing on Heidi A. Campbell’s [...] Read more.
Social media in Hong Kong Christian communities has been viewed in terms of social equalization, allowing laity to shape theology and community practices. But how is social media an equalizer for religious communities, and along which social dimensions? Drawing on Heidi A. Campbell’s “layers” and Pauline Hope Cheong’s “logics” of power, we offer a framework for examining how social media affects leadership roles, community practices, ideology and identity, and approaches to religious texts, in terms of whether these impacts are continuous with and complementary to existing power structures, displace traditional authority, or involve a dialectic between the two. Through case studies of Hong Kong Christian Key Opinion Leaders (KOL), we show displacements of official roles by lay leaders interacting with an underlying logic of continuity along traditional lines such as gender, social class, and sexual orientation. Online structures of community practice complement existing power structures, reinforcing traditional hierarchies of identity, ideology, and religious texts. We conclude by considering how theological approaches to dispossession may help Hong Kong Christian communities to enter a dialectic of challenges and opportunities for equality. Full article
20 pages, 266 KB  
Article
AI and Generative Charisma in Religious Practices
by Francis Khek Gee Lim
Religions 2026, 17(5), 549; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17050549 - 2 May 2026
Viewed by 564
Abstract
Across modern Asia and many other regions, artificial intelligence is transforming religious life in diverse and profound ways. Robot priests chant sutras at Japanese Buddhist temples, AI-powered apps offer personalised coaching in Quranic recitation to millions of Muslims, and bereaved families consult algorithm-generated [...] Read more.
Across modern Asia and many other regions, artificial intelligence is transforming religious life in diverse and profound ways. Robot priests chant sutras at Japanese Buddhist temples, AI-powered apps offer personalised coaching in Quranic recitation to millions of Muslims, and bereaved families consult algorithm-generated avatars of the deceased in China. They are neither merely tools for instrumental use nor channels for transmitting pre-existing religious authority. Instead, they create new forms of religious content, new types of spiritual encounters for religious users, and new structures of authority. This paper argues that understanding these phenomena requires theoretical innovation beyond simply applying existing concepts to new domains. Drawing on Actor–Network Theory, algorithmic culture studies, and scholarship on Asian religious traditions, the paper proposes the theoretical framework of generative charisma, theorising how AI systems gain religious authority through three interconnected mechanisms: captivation by generation, intimacy trust through personalisation, and oscillating enchantment. It also highlights accountability as a structural issue that needs critical discussion regarding governance. The paper demonstrates the framework’s usefulness by examining AI recitation coaching in Islamic practice and AI grief avatars in Chinese Buddhist mourning, showing its relevance across different religious traditions and technological forms. Full article
21 pages, 423 KB  
Article
The Five Sīlas, the Community Pure Land, and a Good Death: The Scholar-Monk Shi Huimin’s Contribution to the Development of Buddhist Palliative Care in Contemporary Taiwan
by Jens Reinke
Religions 2026, 17(5), 524; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17050524 - 26 Apr 2026
Viewed by 827
Abstract
In the history as well as historiography of Chinese Buddhism, the tradition has often been closely associated with death-related cultural practices and ideas, an association that has frequently carried negative connotations. Early twentieth-century reformers such as Taixu famously criticized Buddhism as a religion [...] Read more.
In the history as well as historiography of Chinese Buddhism, the tradition has often been closely associated with death-related cultural practices and ideas, an association that has frequently carried negative connotations. Early twentieth-century reformers such as Taixu famously criticized Buddhism as a religion of ghosts and funerals and sought to redirect Mahāyāna Buddhism toward engagement with an urban, modernizing society. Contemporary Taiwanese Buddhists have realized many aspects of this socially engaged vision. Yet concern with death remains deeply embedded in Buddhist life. Far from standing in contradiction to social engagement, this concern has become one of its central expressions, most visibly in the emergence of modern Buddhist palliative care. Focusing on the writings of the scholar-monk Shi Huimin, this article examines the development of Buddhist palliative care in Taiwan in response to a secular, multireligious, and rapidly aging society, with primary attention to Huimin’s conceptual work. Rather than treating death in isolation, Huimin situates dying within a broader ethical horizon that links good death to good aging, good living, and community formation. Through his reinterpretation of the Five Śīlas and his notion of a Community Pure Land, he extends prevailing concerns with dying well toward a more comprehensive reflection on everyday moral cultivation, healthy lifestyles, and communal responsibility. In this sense, the study reads Buddhist palliative care as a site that “provincializes” dominant Euro-American frameworks of spiritual and palliative care, highlighting their particular historical and Christian-inflected origins while tracing how they are reconfigured and made productive in a multireligious, secular context. By foregrounding Huimin’s conceptual contributions, this study highlights how palliative and spiritual care are localized and reworked within Taiwanese Buddhism, connecting end-of-life care to broader questions of life, aging, and community well-being. Full article
19 pages, 390 KB  
Article
“Dual Moral Authority”: Negotiating Christian Ethics Within Confucian Kinship Frameworks in Rural China
by Kun Xiang and Jianbo Huang
Religions 2026, 17(2), 263; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17020263 - 20 Feb 2026
Viewed by 686
Abstract
The relationship between rural Christianity and the Chinese ethical conception of interpersonal relationships has long been a central concern in scholarly research. Existing studies often frame the two as antagonistic or argue that the Christian configuration of interpersonal relationships is a mere continuation [...] Read more.
The relationship between rural Christianity and the Chinese ethical conception of interpersonal relationships has long been a central concern in scholarly research. Existing studies often frame the two as antagonistic or argue that the Christian configuration of interpersonal relationships is a mere continuation of the traditional differential mode of association (chaxu geju). However, these perspectives often neglect local Christians’ own ethno-theology and its praxis, rendering the cultural transformations brought about by conversion invisible. Focusing on the ordinary ethics of rural Christians and based on long-term fieldwork in Shui County (a pseudonym), a rural region at the junction of Jiangsu, Shandong, Henan and Anhui provinces in China, this study reveals that Christianity instantiates a dual moral authority system within believers’ daily practices: “centripetal authority” and “centrifugal authority”. The former emphasizes inner sincerity, granting believers a degree of moral autonomy. The latter establishes a divine foundation for believers’ social relations. Employing anthropologist Marcel Mauss’s theory of gift to analyze the interaction between two types of authority in the ordinary ethics of believers, this study finds that rural Christianity both consolidates and expands pre-existing, local relational configurations. The extent of this cultural transformation is closely correlated with the depth of the divine–human relationship. Consequently, Christianity’s relationship with traditional Chinese ethics transcends binary oppositions between antagonism and continuity, instead enacting a creative reconfiguration. Full article
19 pages, 2115 KB  
Article
The Marian–Guanyin Nexus in China, Japan, and the Philippines: Interreading, Boundaries, and Comparative Pathways
by Nan Ma
Religions 2026, 17(2), 250; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17020250 - 18 Feb 2026
Viewed by 674
Abstract
Focusing on China, Japan, and the Philippines, this article examines how Marian–Guanyin cross-reading takes shape in images, stories, and ritual practice within different legal and political regimes. Rather than presuming doctrinal equivalence, the analysis treats cross-reading as a practice-driven process structured by five [...] Read more.
Focusing on China, Japan, and the Philippines, this article examines how Marian–Guanyin cross-reading takes shape in images, stories, and ritual practice within different legal and political regimes. Rather than presuming doctrinal equivalence, the analysis treats cross-reading as a practice-driven process structured by five variables: dominant–subaltern relations, legal regime, media, theological thresholds, and intergenerational transmission. Three findings follow. First, analogy and transfer occur mainly in images and devotional practice, rather than doctrine. Second, social context determines both direction and limit: in China, plural traditions allow for devotional coexistence without doctrinal merger; in Tokugawa Japan, Marian–Guanyin likenesses serve as protective cover within underground devotion and take the form of small, portable image types; in the Philippines, Buddhist and folk religions join Catholic social rhythms through functional equivalence in imagery and rite. Third, these patterns lead to three outcome types: intericonic coexistence, type-formation under repression, and inculturation driven by practice and emotion. By distinguishing functional and perceptual equivalence from doctrinal change, and by separating official theology from community narration, the article narrows the scope of “syncretism” and proposes a transferable framework for explaining how images and ritual procedures simultaneously mark boundaries and enable boundary-crossing in unequal religious fields. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 512 KB  
Article
Tinkering with Theology: Liquid Faith and Digital Theological Adaptation Among Pentecostal Youth in Singapore
by Wayne Choong
Religions 2026, 17(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17010023 - 25 Dec 2025
Viewed by 1667
Abstract
Digitalization has transformed how young believers in East Asia encounter, interpret, and negotiate Christian teachings. Drawing on four years of ethnographic and digital fieldwork at a large Pentecostal megachurch in Singapore (2019–2022), this article develops the concept of theological tinkering to describe how [...] Read more.
Digitalization has transformed how young believers in East Asia encounter, interpret, and negotiate Christian teachings. Drawing on four years of ethnographic and digital fieldwork at a large Pentecostal megachurch in Singapore (2019–2022), this article develops the concept of theological tinkering to describe how youth engage diverse Christian ideas through algorithmic exposure, relational discernment, and institutional boundary-work. In an environment where spiritual content circulates through smartphones, social media, livestreams, and peer networks, theological meaning is increasingly assembled through movement rather than inherited through stable structures. The article situates the Singaporean case within broader scholarship on mediatization, hybridity, digital authority, and liquid modernity, showing how theological reasoning is shaped by digital infrastructures, affective-spiritual evaluation, and communal negotiation. Rather than signalling doctrinal instability, theological tinkering reflects a resilient mode of liquid faith: a capacity to remain rooted while navigating plurality. The findings invite a rethinking of theological formation, pastoral leadership, and digital discipleship in East Asia’s rapidly evolving religious landscape. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop