Artificial Intelligence in Oncologic Imaging: Advances in Medical Image Segmentation and Predictive Modelling

A special issue of Medical Sciences (ISSN 2076-3271).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 September 2026 | Viewed by 5536

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
Interests: artificial intelligence; biomedical image processing; decision-making systems; DICOM standard; graphical user interface

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
Interests: image processing; deep learning; multimodal AI; cancer therapy; drug discovery; DICOM standard

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed oncology by introducing powerful new methods for diagnosing, segmenting, and monitoring medical images across a wide spectrum of clinical applications. This Special Issue seeks original contributions that advance the integration of AI into oncologic imaging and related domains. Key areas of interest include radiomic analysis through multimodal deep neural networks, medical image segmentation for lesion detection, boundary delineation, treatment planning, as well as predictive modelling using machine learning, deep learning, and generative frameworks such as Vision–Language Models. These innovations enhance our capacity to interpret complex biomedical data, offering new insights into disease characterisation and supporting personalised therapeutic strategies. By highlighting current challenges and opportunities, this Special Issue aims to foster deeper integration of AI technologies within precision medicine.

Dr. Orazio Gambino
Dr. Salvatore Contino
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medical Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • medical image segmentation
  • oncologic imaging
  • radiomics
  • deep learning
  • machine learning
  • predictive modelling
  • vision language models
  • multimodal imaging
  • precision medicine

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

17 pages, 3787 KB  
Article
Human-in-the-Loop Enhances Machine Learning Inference in Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography Glioma Imaging
by Radik Zinatullin, Alexander Sovetsky, Artem Grishin, Elena Kiseleva, Liudmila Kukhnina, Svetlana Korikova, Alexander Matveyev, Vladimir Zaitsev, Konstantin Yashin and Lev Matveev
Med. Sci. 2026, 14(2), 263; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14020263 - 20 May 2026
Viewed by 501
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into clinical workflows raises critical questions regarding decision-making responsibility, as fully autonomous systems inevitably carry a margin of error that can be fatal in high-stakes fields like surgery. This study addresses this challenge by evaluating [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into clinical workflows raises critical questions regarding decision-making responsibility, as fully autonomous systems inevitably carry a margin of error that can be fatal in high-stakes fields like surgery. This study addresses this challenge by evaluating a “Human-in-the-Loop” (HITL) workflow, using intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) for glioma detection. We aimed to determine if integrating Machine Learning (ML)-generated segmentation maps with human contextual analysis resolves the tension between automation and clinical responsibility, yielding superior diagnostic reliability compared to structural or quantitative imaging alone. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 86 intraoperative OCT scans from 27 patients. Five neurosurgeons blindly assessed the data across three progressive levels of processing: (1) structural scans, (2) physics-based parametric maps, and (3) SVM-based generated segmentation maps. Crucially, the HITL inference performance on segmentation maps was benchmarked against “models-only” inference pipeline: a SVM and a state-of-the-art multimodal reasoning model, Gemini 3.1 Pro. To evaluate interpretability and the operator’s ability to confidently exercise their authority, we measured inter-rater consistency alongside diagnostic performance. Results: The results demonstrate that, while quantitative parametric maps improved Global Accuracy (87% [95% CI: 82–92%]) compared to structural scans (80% [95% CI: 73–86%]), they suffered from an “interpretability gap,” resulting in a moderate inter-rater consistency of 0.68 [95% CI: 0.59–0.78]. In contrast, the HITL approach using segmentation maps maximized consensus to 0.98 [95% CI: 0.95–1.00] and achieved the highest performance (Accuracy 94% [95% CI: 88–98%] and Sensitivity 98% [95% CI: 92–100%]). Compared to the standalone models, the HITL approach significantly outperformed the SVM baseline (Accuracy 84% [95% CI: 81–87%]; Sensitivity 83% [95% CI: 78–88%]). Furthermore, it surpassed the SOTA Gemini 3.1 Pro model (Accuracy 90% [95% CI: 83–95%]; Sensitivity 86% [95% CI: 74–95%]). While the HITL sensitivity demonstrated a definitive and statistically significant edge over the Gemini model, the accuracy improvement fell just slightly short of undisputed statistical significance due to overlapping confidence intervals. Conclusions: By utilizing their clinical domain knowledge of tumor invasion patterns and topological priors, surgeons effectively filtered algorithmic noise—overriding ML errors in 69% (9 out of 13) false positive cases that models alone could not resolve. This demonstrates exactly how and where HITL optimally utilizes human contextual intelligence to outperform autonomous “models-only” pipelines, confirming a human-ML synergy that augments the objectivity of machine learning with human domain knowledge. This paradigm ensures that the ultimate responsibility for diagnostic inference remains safely and practically in human hands. Open Data Initiative: To ensure essential reproducibility, enable independent multi-center validation and support open science, all examples of intraoperative in vivo OCT brain scans used in this study are made publicly available. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first open-access data of its kind globally. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1807 KB  
Article
Drawing the Line: From U-Net-Based Glioblastoma Segmentation to Machine Learning-Driven Survival Prediction
by Costin Chirica, Bogdan-Ionuț Dobrovăț, Sabina-Ioana Chirica, Oriana-Maria Onicescu, Andreea Rotundu, Emilia-Adriana Marciuc, Laura-Elena Cucu, Daniela Pomohaci, Răzvan-Constantin Anghel, Mihaela-Roxana Popescu, Alexandra Maștaleru, Danisia Haba and Maria Magdalena Leon
Med. Sci. 2026, 14(1), 119; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14010119 - 3 Mar 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1663
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Glioblastoma (GB) remains the most prevalent primary malignant brain tumor in adults, characterized by its aggressive nature and poor prognosis. The present study endeavored to contribute to the development of advanced computational tools for neuro-oncology by integrating artificial intelligence (AI)-based segmentation [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Glioblastoma (GB) remains the most prevalent primary malignant brain tumor in adults, characterized by its aggressive nature and poor prognosis. The present study endeavored to contribute to the development of advanced computational tools for neuro-oncology by integrating artificial intelligence (AI)-based segmentation and multi-model machine learning (ML) approaches. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with GB. AI-driven algorithms were utilized to perform volumetric segmentation of GB. These quantitative metrics were subsequently integrated into a multi-model ML framework to analyze correlations with patient survival and evaluate the predictive accuracy of the resulting models. Results: A total of 79 patients were ultimately included in the study after meeting all eligibility criteria. The results showed that larger GB tumors were associated with shorter post-treatment survival. Necrotic patterns within GB tumors impacted patient survival rates and response to therapy. Quantitative volumetric analysis of tumor enhancement, shape features, and morphological metrics were associated with patient outcomes. The Neural Network remained the top ML model performer overall for discrimination, but the Random Forest model also showed strong practical performance. Conclusions: As a summary, our study contributes to the development of advanced computational tools for neuro-oncology by integrating AI-based segmentation and multi-model ML approaches, and the results highlight the importance of imaging biomarkers in understanding GB prognosis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 3100 KB  
Article
A Lightweight Cross-Gated Dual-Branch Attention Network for Colon and Lung Cancer Diagnosis from Histopathological Images
by Raquel Ochoa-Ornelas, Alberto Gudiño-Ochoa, Sergio Octavio Rosales-Aguayo, Jesús Ezequiel Molinar-Solís, Sonia Espinoza-Morales and René Gudiño-Venegas
Med. Sci. 2025, 13(4), 286; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13040286 - 26 Nov 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1225
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Accurate histopathological classification of lung and colon tissues remains difficult due to subtle morphological overlap between benign and malignant regions. Deep learning approaches have advanced diagnostic precision, yet models often lack interpretability or require complex multi-stage pipelines. This study aimed to develop [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Accurate histopathological classification of lung and colon tissues remains difficult due to subtle morphological overlap between benign and malignant regions. Deep learning approaches have advanced diagnostic precision, yet models often lack interpretability or require complex multi-stage pipelines. This study aimed to develop an end-to-end dual-branch attention network capable of achieving high accuracy while preserving computational efficiency and transparency. Methods: The architecture integrates EfficientNetV2-B0 and MobileNetV3-Small backbones through a cross-gated fusion mechanism that adaptively balances global context and fine structural details. Efficient channel attention and generalized mean pooling enhance discriminative learning without external feature extraction or optimization stages. Results: The network achieved 99.84% accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, with an MCC of 0.998. Grad-CAM maps showed strong spatial correspondence with diagnostically relevant histological structures. Conclusions: The end-to-end framework enables the reliable, interpretable, and computationally efficient classification of lung and colon histopathology and has potential applicability to computer-assisted diagnostic workflows. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3443 KB  
Article
Automated Detection and Grading of Renal Cell Carcinoma in Histopathological Images via Efficient Attention Transformer Network
by Hissa Al-kuwari, Belqes Alshami, Aisha Al-Khinji, Adnan Haider and Muhammad Arsalan
Med. Sci. 2025, 13(4), 257; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13040257 - 1 Nov 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1128
Abstract
Background: Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer and requires accurate histopathological grading for effective prognosis and treatment planning. However, manual grading is time-consuming, subjective, and susceptible to inter-observer variability. Objective: This study proposes EAT-Net (Efficient Attention Transformer [...] Read more.
Background: Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer and requires accurate histopathological grading for effective prognosis and treatment planning. However, manual grading is time-consuming, subjective, and susceptible to inter-observer variability. Objective: This study proposes EAT-Net (Efficient Attention Transformer Network), a dual-stream deep learning model designed to automate and enhance RCC grade classification from histopathological images. Method: EAT-Net integrates EfficientNetB0 for local feature extraction and a Vision Transformer (ViT) stream for capturing global contextual dependencies. The architecture incorporates Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) modules to recalibrate feature maps, improving focus on informative regions. The model was trained and evaluated on two publicly available datasets, KMC-RENAL and RCCG-Net. Standard preprocessing was applied, and the model’s performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Results: EAT-Net achieved superior results compared to state-of-the-art models, with an accuracy of 92.25%, precision of 92.15%, recall of 92.12%, and F1-score of 92.25%. Ablation studies demonstrated the complementary value of the EfficientNet and ViT streams. Additionally, Grad-CAM visualizations confirmed that the model focuses on diagnostically relevant areas, supporting its interpretability and clinical relevance. Conclusion: EAT-Net offers an accurate, and explainable framework for RCC grading. Its lightweight architecture and high performance make it well-suited for clinical deployment in digital pathology workflows. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

23 pages, 1079 KB  
Systematic Review
MRI-Based Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence for Prediction of Recurrence and Prognostic Outcomes in Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review with Functional Meta-Synthesis
by Carlos M. Ardila, Eliana Pineda-Vélez, Anny M. Vivares-Builes and Alejandro I. Díaz-Laclaustra
Med. Sci. 2026, 14(2), 332; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14020332 - 19 Jun 2026
Viewed by 179
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) remains clinically challenging because conventional clinicopathological markers do not fully explain variability in recurrence and survival. This systematic review and functional meta-synthesis aimed to identify and critically appraise studies using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) remains clinically challenging because conventional clinicopathological markers do not fully explain variability in recurrence and survival. This systematic review and functional meta-synthesis aimed to identify and critically appraise studies using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics, artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning, or quantitative MRI-derived models to predict recurrence and prognostic outcomes in OTSCC. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched from inception to March 2026. Eligible studies included prognostic model investigations in adults with OTSCC or primary tongue cancer without reported base-of-tongue/oropharyngeal involvement, undergoing preoperative MRI and surgery, with recurrence- or survival-related follow-up. The primary synthesis was a functional meta-synthesis; pooling was not performed because studies were not sufficiently comparable. Results: Seven retrospective studies were included, with a summed descriptive sample of 1287 participants. The evidence base was heterogeneous in MRI sequences, segmentation workflows, model architecture, validation strategy, and endpoint definition. Functional meta-synthesis identified four domains: direct recurrence-oriented modeling, broader prognostic stratification, reported incremental or complementary value over clinical frameworks, and translational maturity/technical implementation. Several studies reported associations between MRI-derived signatures and recurrence- or survival-related outcomes, but findings were interpreted narratively because of differences in primary endpoints, imaging features, model design, validation methods, and outcome definitions. Most studies were judged at high overall risk of bias, and certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low. Conclusions: MRI-based radiomics and AI show preliminary promise for prognostic stratification in OTSCC, particularly recurrence-related risk refinement, but current evidence remains limited by retrospective design, heterogeneity, sparse external validation, and low certainty. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop