Medical Sciences

Introduction: Alcohol consumption is a significant risk factor for hypertension (HTN), a prevalent condition that substantially affects cardiovascular health. In Peru, where various traditional alcoholic beverages exist, the relationship between alcohol consumption and HTN has not been fully explored. Objective: To determine the association between different patterns of alcohol consumption, types of beverages, and various types of HTN. Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study utilized data from the Peruvian Demographic and Family Health Survey (2018–2023), including 236,243 adults (55.95% male; mean age: 41.06 years). General HTN, isolated systolic hypertension (ISH), isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH), and systolic-diastolic hypertension (SDH) were evaluated. Alcohol consumption was assessed through self-reported questionnaires evaluating consumption pattern (non-excessive vs. excessive), intensity (light, moderate, heavy), consistency (intermittent vs. consistent), and primary beverage type, including both commercial and traditional Peruvian drinks. Results: Excessive alcohol consumption was significantly associated with an increased risk of HTN (aPR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.07–1.31), IDH (aPR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.20–2.16), and SDH (aPR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.18–1.78). Excessive alcohol consumption was significantly associated with an increased risk of HTN (aPR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.07–1.31), IDH (aPR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.20–2.16), and SDH (aPR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.18–1.78). Consumption of traditional beverages such as chicha and Masato was associated with an elevated risk of various types of HTN. In contrast, wine consumption demonstrated a protective association against general HTN and IDH. Conclusions: Alcohol consumption patterns and beverage types have differential effects on HTN risk in the Peruvian population. These findings underscore the need for culturally adapted prevention strategies and more nuanced public health recommendations regarding alcohol consumption in Peru.

Background: Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) following head and neck radiotherapy has been demonstrated to induce structural and functional alterations of the upper airway, with the potential to complicate the process of tracheal intubation. Despite its clinical relevance, there is a paucity of systematic evidence on airway characteristics in ORN and reliable predictors of difficult tracheal intubation. This study compares preoperative airway parameters and tracheal intubation outcomes in irradiated patients with and without ORN and introduces a novel preoperative ORN-Difficult-Airway Score for risk stratification. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, airway assessments, tracheal intubation methods, and perioperative visualization parameters were evaluated in 105 patients following head and neck radiotherapy. Group differences between non-ORN and ORN were analyzed using chi-square tests. A preoperative ORN-Difficult-Airway Score was constructed using exclusively bedside parameters, based on statistically and clinically relevant predictors. Results: Patients with ORN showed significantly restricted mouth opening (p < 0.001), higher Mallampati classes, particularly Mallampati IV, and a greater need for fiberoptic tracheal intubation (p < 0.01). Direct laryngoscopy (DL) was significantly less feasible in ORN, while hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy (VL) yielded consistently positive visualization (first-pass success (FPS) 100% in both groups). Under DL, FPS was lower in ORN (54.2% vs. 79.5%), resulting in an odds ratio of 0.305. Based on observed predictors, ORN status, mouth opening <3 cm, Mallampati class, restricted neck reclination, and history of difficult intubation, a preoperative ORN-Difficult-Airway Score was developed. Conclusions: ORN has been associated with distinct alterations in airway anatomy and visualization, resulting in increased tracheal intubation complexity after head and neck radiotherapy. The proposed ORN-Difficult-Airway Score presents a clinically practical, bedside-applicable approach to stratifying the risk of tracheal intubation in this population. Prior to clinical implementation, prospective validation in larger cohorts is warranted.

Background/Objectives: Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is used in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) to visualize dynamic upper airway collapse, but sedation protocols vary widely with no consensus on the optimal agent or technique. This narrative review aims to clarify current sedation strategies for DISE in OSA and their clinical implications. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for English-language publications on DISE sedation (2000–2025). Relevant clinical studies, guidelines, and reviews were included. Data were qualitatively synthesized due to heterogeneity among studies. Results: Sedation approaches in DISE varied considerably. Propofol, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam were the primary agents identified. Propofol provided rapid, titratable sedation but increased airway collapsibility at higher doses; dexmedetomidine produced a more natural sleep-like state with minimal respiratory depression; midazolam was less favored due to prolonged effects. Use of target-controlled infusion (TCI) and pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) models improved control of propofol sedation. Co-sedative adjuncts (e.g., opioids) reduced the required sedative dose but added risk of respiratory depression. Careful titration to the lowest effective dose-often guided by bispectral index (BIS) monitoring—was emphasized to achieve adequate sedation without artifactual airway collapse. No universal DISE sedation protocol was identified. Conclusions: Optimal DISE sedation balances adequate depth with patient safety to ensure reliable findings. Using the minimum effective dose, guided by objective monitoring (e.g., BIS), is recommended. There is a need for standardized sedation protocols and further research (e.g., in obese patients) to resolve current controversies and improve DISE’s utility in OSA management.