Building a Culture of Integrity: The Role of Anti-Corruption Laws

A special issue of Laws (ISSN 2075-471X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 16 March 2026 | Viewed by 1850

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Law, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Interests: anti-corruption law, anti-money laundering law and international human rights law

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The relationship between law and corruption is intricate and multifaceted, shaped by varying disciplinary perspectives and contextual realities. Monique Nuijten and Gerhard Anders’ seminal research (2007) offered an anthropological lens on this interplay, revealing the hidden continuities between corruption and law. They provocatively argued that corruption and law, often perceived as opposites, are deeply intertwined, with the potential for corruption embedded within legal systems themselves. This Special Issue seeks to revisit this critical question, challenging scholars and practitioners to engage with or refute this claim in light of contemporary developments.

While corruption is frequently framed as the antithesis of the rule of law, certain legal frameworks, such as state-sanctioned impunity for corrupt officials, reveal a more nuanced dynamic. Despite these paradoxes, law remains an indispensable instrument for combating corruption and promoting integrity. This Special Issue invites contributions that critically examine the role of anti-corruption laws at national, regional, and international levels.

We are particularly interested in analyses that address the effectiveness of anti-corruption legislation in mitigating corruption, its impact on fostering a culture of integrity, and the interactions between legal frameworks and societal norms. Submissions might explore the successes and challenges associated with implementing anti-corruption measures, offering case studies or dissecting treaties and other legal instruments. Contributions that interrogate the limitations of existing legal approaches or propose innovative frameworks for reform are equally welcome.

A crucial aspect of this volume will focus on decolonizing anti-corruption legal frameworks. Many so-called “model” anti-corruption laws, often promoted by international organizations, reflect Western legal traditions and norms. We invite discussions on how these frameworks are framed, lobbied for, and adopted in developing countries, often without adequate consideration of local contexts or priorities. Contributions could also explore the influence of global anti-corruption instruments, such as the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), and their domestic implementation.

Moreover, we encourage critical reflections on whether recent advancements in anti-corruption laws provide an illusion of control, masking systemic barriers that enable corruption. Papers might investigate how legal mechanisms, while essential, often fail to address the structural and political foundations of corruption.

Through this Special Issue, we aim to foster a deeper understanding of how legal instruments can advance accountability and integrity while addressing the power dynamics, inequalities, and challenges that complicate their implementation. By bringing together diverse perspectives, this volume seeks to illuminate the potential and limitations of law in constructing a world where integrity prevails over corruption.

Scholars, practitioners, and policymakers are invited to submit papers that engage with these themes. Abstracts should outline the paper’s key arguments, methodology, and its contribution to the broader discourse on anti-corruption and integrity.

Dr. Prosper Simbarashe Maguchu
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Laws is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • anti-corruption laws
  • integrity
  • corruption
  • legal frameworks
  • decolonizing anti-corruption
  • accountability
  • international treaties
  • structural barriers
  • rule of law
  • societal norms

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

20 pages, 347 KB  
Article
Law Enforcement on Misuse of Social Assistance Funds: A Legal Sociology Perspective
by Wiwie Heryani, Ratnawati Ratnawati, Maskun Maskun, Amaliyah Amaliyah, Andi Muhammad Aswin Anas, Muhammad Hasrul, Asmunandar Asmunandar, Muhammad Surya Gemilang and Wafiq Azizah
Laws 2025, 14(6), 93; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14060093 - 30 Nov 2025
Viewed by 446
Abstract
Social assistance is one of the primary programs organized in developing countries in a bid to reduce poverty. In Indonesia, the government has allocated IDR 152 trillion toward poverty alleviation. However, the persistent misuse of social assistance funds has unfolded to be a [...] Read more.
Social assistance is one of the primary programs organized in developing countries in a bid to reduce poverty. In Indonesia, the government has allocated IDR 152 trillion toward poverty alleviation. However, the persistent misuse of social assistance funds has unfolded to be a serious concern. According to the Ombudsman of Indonesia, approximately 81.37% of the 1004 complaints received between 29 April and 29 May 2020 were related to the misuse and misallocation of COVID-19 social assistance funds. Therefore, this study aims to comprehensively describe the legal enforcement model for preventing the misuse of social assistance funds and to identify the challenges faced by law enforcement from the perspective of legal sociology. In order to achieve the stated objectives, a qualitative approach grounded in legal sociology was adopted, utilizing empirical study methods. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with academics specializing in administrative law and public policy, as well as through an extensive review of the relevant literature. Subsequently, the gathered data were analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive approach. The obtained results showed that the key challenges in preventing the misuse of social assistance funds include weak regulatory frameworks, limited competency among law enforcement officials, and inadequate institutional infrastructure. Cultural factors were also found to play a significant role in influencing the effectiveness of law enforcement. Based on these insights, preventive measures were inferred to be essential and should focus specifically on strengthening the legal structure and utilizing technological tools to enhance transparency and monitoring. Accordingly, the substance of social assistance laws must be revised to include more detailed and specific provisions, while repressive measures should impose stricter sanctions on individuals who engage in misuse. Fostering a shift in the legal culture of society was also considered very important. These combined efforts are expected to reduce the misuse of social assistance funds, improve legal enforcement effectiveness, and essentially contribute to poverty reduction in Indonesia. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Building a Culture of Integrity: The Role of Anti-Corruption Laws)

Review

Jump to: Research

21 pages, 262 KB  
Review
Deconstructing Corruption: From (Un)Fixed Definitions to Evolving Perspectives
by Maria Samantha Orozco Menéndez
Laws 2025, 14(6), 88; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14060088 - 19 Nov 2025
Viewed by 805
Abstract
This piece examines the persistent conceptual and normative challenges surrounding corruption in international law. It revisits classical definitions and perceptions of corruption, highlighting their influence on contemporary understandings. It critiques the approach of key international instruments, which, despite extensive efforts to combat corruption, [...] Read more.
This piece examines the persistent conceptual and normative challenges surrounding corruption in international law. It revisits classical definitions and perceptions of corruption, highlighting their influence on contemporary understandings. It critiques the approach of key international instruments, which, despite extensive efforts to combat corruption, have refrained from providing a unified definition, opting instead for pragmatic frameworks that result practically on criminal types. The analysis interrogates the traditional classification of corruption into petty and grand forms, acknowledging the growing recognition of institutional corruption as a distinct and equally destructive category. The article also highlights the bias in existing frameworks that focus predominantly on public-sector misconduct, often overlooking harmful practices in the private sector that are closely linked to broader dynamics of institutional corruption. Finally, it engages with the dual characterization of corruption as both a criminal offence and a potential violation of human rights. It argues for a paradigm shift: international law should focus less on definitional debates and more on recognizing the tangible harms of corruption, enabling accountability and reparations for acts that undermine democratic institutions and violate human rights. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Building a Culture of Integrity: The Role of Anti-Corruption Laws)
Back to TopTop