Tsunami Science and Future Mitigation Strategies

A special issue of Geosciences (ISSN 2076-3263). This special issue belongs to the section "Natural Hazards".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 March 2021) | Viewed by 18646

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre for Geographical Studies, Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Branca Edmée Marques, 1600-276 Lisboa, Portugal
Interests: tsunami generation mechanism; tsunami numerical modeling; tsunami field survey; tsunami hazard and risk evaluation; disaster prevention and management

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Area of Geological Hazards and Risks, Spanish Geological Survey, Ministry of Science and Innovation, 28003 Madrid, Spain
Interests: landslides, floods, tsunamis, rock mechanics, natural hazards modelling; natural risks modelling; disaster prevention; management and mitigation of natural hazards
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) has been providing several guidelines and initiatives to be implemented at the local level in order to allow coastal communities to become more resilient to tsunamis. Still, lessons from recent tsunami events such as the 2004 Indian Ocean, 2011 Tohoku, and 2018 Sulawesi and Krakatau have shown that coastal communites are at risk and therefore, the implementation of tsunami mitigation strategies continues to be a challenge. In addition, the current COVID-19 has overwhelmed emergency services, triggering the activation of national and local emergency and contingency plans. Thus, this shift of priorities may create confusion regarding tsunami warning and response actions to both stakeholders and citizens. Therefore, local coastal communities may face multi-disaster situations that could increase the number of fatalities and damages.

This Special Issue welcomes original research on tsunami science, including discussions on situations associated with the current COVID-19, so the resilience of coastal communities can further develop. These may include, but are not limited to the following:

1) Meteotsunamis and other non-seismic tsunami sources;

2) Post-tsunami field surveys and Geologic records;

3) Historical events and databases;

4) Tsunami modeling (propagation and inundation techniques) and PTHA;

5) ICT  to  support  decision  making, including tsunami warning systems and stakeholders response;

6) Tsunami hazard and risk assessment;

7) Urban planning, recovery and reconstruction;

8) Mitigation strategies, including tsunami education and awareness, evacuation maps and exercises, and coastal defense;

Dr. Angela Santos
Dr. Miguel Isidro
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Geosciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Tsunami generation mechanism
  • Field survey
  • Tsunami modeling
  • Tsunami hazard and risk assessment
  • Coastal defense
  • Tsunami mitigation
  • Urban planning
  • Disaster risk reduction

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 3410 KiB  
Article
A Review on Historical Tsunamis in the Canary Islands: Implications for Tsunami Risk Reduction
by Inés Galindo, Carmen Romero, Esther Martín-González, Juana Vegas and Nieves Sánchez
Geosciences 2021, 11(5), 222; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11050222 - 20 May 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 11717
Abstract
The analysis of the historical documentary sources together with evidence from the geological record is essential to understand the impact and processes triggered by tsunamis on the Canary Islands. This archipelago has been affected by tsunamis caused by different geological processes, of which [...] Read more.
The analysis of the historical documentary sources together with evidence from the geological record is essential to understand the impact and processes triggered by tsunamis on the Canary Islands. This archipelago has been affected by tsunamis caused by different geological processes, of which the most studied have been those generated by prehistoric mega-landslides. However, there is also evidence of those produced by distant tsunamigenic sources. An exhaustive review of all documentation available was made, identifying the existence of at least four seismically triggered tsunami episodes (1755, 1761, 1941 and 1969), the majority with an epicenter in the Azores-Gibraltar boundary. In this work, several tsunamis are cited for the first time, such as the one produced by the Argaga (La Gomera) landslide in 2020. Other episodes historically identified as tsunamis are discarded as they corresponded to other geological events. The effects of most historic tsunamis have gone unnoticed, having occurred in epochs of sparsely populated coastal areas. But their study allows us to infer the need for the archipelago authorities to establish preventive measures to avoid possible damage from tsunamis, especially if we consider the presently high population density of the Canarian littoral. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tsunami Science and Future Mitigation Strategies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1577 KiB  
Article
Influence of Tsunami Aspect Ratio on Near and Far-Field Tsunami Amplitude
by Natalia K. Sannikova, Harvey Segur and Diego Arcas
Geosciences 2021, 11(4), 178; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11040178 - 16 Apr 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2762
Abstract
This study presents a numerical investigation of the source aspect ratio (AR) influence on tsunami decay characteristics with an emphasis in near and far-field differences for two initial wave shapes Pure Positive Wave and N-wave. It is shown that, when initial total energy [...] Read more.
This study presents a numerical investigation of the source aspect ratio (AR) influence on tsunami decay characteristics with an emphasis in near and far-field differences for two initial wave shapes Pure Positive Wave and N-wave. It is shown that, when initial total energy for both tsunami types is kept the same, short-rupture tsunami with more concentrated energy are likely to be more destructive in the near-field, whereas long rupture tsunami are more dangerous in the far-field. The more elongated the source is, the stronger the directivity and the slower the amplitude decays in the intermediate- and far-fields. We present evidence of this behavior by comparing amplitude decay rates from idealized sources and showing their correlation with that observed in recent historical events of similar AR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tsunami Science and Future Mitigation Strategies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4613 KiB  
Article
Flume Experiments on Flow Analysis and Energy Reduction through a Compound Tsunami Mitigation System with a Seaward Embankment and Landward Vegetation over a Mound
by Md Abedur Rahman, Norio Tanaka and A. H. M. Rashedunnabi
Geosciences 2021, 11(2), 90; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020090 - 15 Feb 2021
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 2767
Abstract
As a countermeasure against tsunami inundation, the present study conducted a series of laboratory experiments using a compound mitigation system in which a seaward embankment (E) followed by landward coastal vegetation (V) over a mound (M) (EMV) was investigated in supercritical [...] Read more.
As a countermeasure against tsunami inundation, the present study conducted a series of laboratory experiments using a compound mitigation system in which a seaward embankment (E) followed by landward coastal vegetation (V) over a mound (M) (EMV) was investigated in supercritical flow conditions. The changes of flow around the mitigation system and energy reduction were clarified under varying conditions of mound height and vegetation density. Cases of an embankment followed by only a mound (EMNV) were also considered for comparison. Experimental results showed that three basic types of flow structures were observed within the mitigation system in EMV cases. A water cushion was created within the mitigation system mainly due to the combined effects of the mound and vegetation. It significantly reduced the maximum total energy in EMV cases by approximately 41–66%, whereas in EMNV cases, the maximum energy reduction was found to be 23–65%. Increments in both mound height and vegetation density increased the intensity of the water cushion within the mitigation system by offering more drag and reflecting the flow, and hence, significantly reduced the energy of the flow. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tsunami Science and Future Mitigation Strategies)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop