Advanced Studies on Psychological Resilience to Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: Current Trends and Future Directions

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Psychiatric, Emotional and Behavioral Disorders".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2025) | Viewed by 2118

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
Interests: suicide-related experiences; psychosis; psychological resilience; mental health; wellbeing

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Suicide is a leading cause of death worldwide. Over 720,000 people die by suicide yearly, which equates to one death by suicide every 40 seconds. Suicidal experiences, including suicidal thoughts, plans, urges, behaviours, and attempts, are even more frequent. Consequently, efforts are made to understand the precursors and risks associated with suicide-related experiences and deaths from different perspectives, such as epidemiology, public health, sociology, and psychology. It is essential to identify multiple risk factors for suicide; however, these do not provide a comprehensive understanding of the complex mechanisms underlying suicidal thoughts and behaviours. Hence, it is imperative not only to identify and examine the risk factors of suicide, but to also investigate the obverse side of suicide risk. That is, to understand what enables people to develop and maintain psychological resilience to various suicide-related experiences.

Psychological resilience is poorly understood conceptually. Despite an unclear conceptualisation, definitions of resilience have aspects in common. They broadly include a presence of predisposing factors (e.g., adverse life events or stress), a positive outcome (e.g., recovering/'bouncing back’ from the deleterious impact of the adverse event), and a range of protective attributes (e.g., personal beliefs, abilities, skills). Recently, resilience has been viewed as an amalgamation of modifiable factors or processes that can be nurtured and maintained by individuals. The aim of this Special Issue is to consolidate cutting edge research, theories, methodologies, and innovations in understanding the psychological resilience mechanisms underlying suicidal thoughts and behaviours across different populations. By integrating empirical evidence and perspectives from multiple disciplines, this Special Issue seeks holistic understanding and approaches to addressing the global healthcare problem of suicide from an alternate perspective to suicide risk, that is, psychological resilience.

We invite contributions from mental health researchers, academics, mental health professionals, clinicians, psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, data scientists, epidemiologists, public health policymakers, and early-career researchers. Authors are encouraged to adopt diverse methodologies and interdisciplinary perspectives, and to consider various individual, cultural, demographic, ethical, and socioeconomic contexts in their work. We welcome original research papers and review articles focusing on the following:

  • Conceptual understanding;
  • Psychological mechanisms;
  • Considerations of individual-level interventions and system-level changes;
  • Understanding and tailoring interventions across different populations.

This Special Issue aims to not only advance scientific understanding, but to inform policies and effective interventions that foster psychological resilience and ameliorate the impact of suicide-related experiences on individuals and broader society. Therein, we welcome submissions of high-quality, original articles and systematic literature reviews, adopting quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods of research. Importantly, incorporating the views of people with lived experience in the research process is essential and strongly encouraged.

Dr. Kamelia Harris
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • suicide
  • suicide death
  • suicidal behaviours
  • suicidal thoughts
  • suicidal ideation
  • self-harm
  • suicidality
  • psychological resilience
  • wellbeing
  • mental health

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

18 pages, 472 KB  
Article
Examining Resilience in Those With and Without Suicidal Ideation
by Denny Meyer, Philip Sumner, Erica Neill, Andrea Phillipou, Wei Lin Toh, Tamsyn E. Van Rheenen and Susan L. Rossell
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 260; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020260 - 10 Feb 2026
Viewed by 386
Abstract
Self-report surveys were conducted in Australia between May 2020 and April 2024, allowing for an analysis of perceived psychological resilience in those with and without suicidal ideation (SI) during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Linear mixed models were used to describe the factors [...] Read more.
Self-report surveys were conducted in Australia between May 2020 and April 2024, allowing for an analysis of perceived psychological resilience in those with and without suicidal ideation (SI) during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Linear mixed models were used to describe the factors associated with psychological resilience in these populations and in people experiencing transitions between SI states. Of the 1145 people who responded more than once to the survey, 879 (77%) always reported “never SI”, 84 (7%) always reported SI, while 182 (16%) reported SI for only some of their surveys. People who moved between SI states reported significantly lower psychological resilience than those who reported “never SI”, but significantly higher psychological resilience than those reporting SI in all their surveys. For participants always reporting SI, greater psychological resilience was significantly associated with greater hopefulness and quality of life, and less sleep than usual. In people who moved between SI states, greater psychological resilience was significantly associated with greater hopefulness, less psychological distress and lower likelihood of mental illness. Only participants with “never SI” reported better psychological resilience alongside consistent sleep and exercise quantities. These results have important implications for suicide prevention in Australia. However, bidirectional associations require further investigation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

19 pages, 680 KB  
Review
Beyond Risk Prediction: Considering Upstream Universal Suicide Prevention to Decrease Risk and Increase Resilience
by Sarah Sparks, Cole Marvin, Regan Sweeney, Destiny Rojas and Sean M. Mitchell
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 243; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020243 - 9 Feb 2026
Viewed by 992
Abstract
Despite decades of research, suicide risk factors predict outcomes at chance levels, and there is a dearth of protective factor and resilience research, which limits the utility of risk-based approaches. Further, suicide prevention interventions primarily consist of individual psychotherapies and treating individuals after [...] Read more.
Despite decades of research, suicide risk factors predict outcomes at chance levels, and there is a dearth of protective factor and resilience research, which limits the utility of risk-based approaches. Further, suicide prevention interventions primarily consist of individual psychotherapies and treating individuals after suicide-related outcomes occur. Unfortunately, there is a lack of upstream suicide prevention interventions targeting known suicide risk factors and aiming to increase well-being and resilience in the U.S. Thus, we discuss these problems in the field and the U.S. health care system and provide a possible solution. We propose using low-intensity, universal, and upstream prevention interventions, such as Stress Control. Stress Control is a classroom-style, Cognitive Behavior Therapy-based program shown to reduce “risk,” stress, anxiety, and depression and boost well-being and resilience as part of a stepped-care model. Although Stress Control’s suicide prevention effectiveness has not yet been directly assessed, we discuss how it could be a promising suicide prevention strategy with additional testing. A proposed mechanism for this reduction is building resilience to common risk factors and suicide ideation via evidence-based coping skills, thereby decreasing future suicide risk. We review current limitations and discuss how upstream, scalable, universal prevention interventions can help improve psychological resilience and reduce suicidal thoughts and behaviors, lowering the U.S. suicide rate. Implications and recommendations are discussed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop